Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;96:3294-3299

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, M. St. J.
Right arrow Articles by Braunwald, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, M. St. J.
Right arrow Articles by Braunwald, E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CAPTOPRIL
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack

(Circulation. 1997;96:3294-3299.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Cardiovascular Death and Left Ventricular Remodeling Two Years After Myocardial Infarction

Baseline Predictors and Impact of Long-term Use of Captopril: Information From the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) Trial

Martin St. John Sutton, FRCP; Marc A. Pfeffer, MD, PhD; Lemuel Moye, MD, PhD; Ted Plappert, CVT; Jean L. Rouleau, MD; Gervasio Lamas, MD; Jacques Rouleau, MD; John O. Parker, MD; Malcolm O. Arnold, MD; Bruce Sussex, MD; Eugene Braunwald, MD; ; for the SAVE Investigators

From the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, and University of Pennsylvania Medical Center (Philadelphia).

Correspondence to M. St. John Sutton, FRCP, Division of Cardiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background We quantified cardiovascular death and/or left ventricular (LV) dilatation in patients from the SAVE trial to determine whether dilatation continued beyond 1 year, whether ACE inhibitor therapy attenuated late LV dilatation, and whether any baseline descriptors predicted late dilatation.

Methods and Results Two-dimensional echocardiograms were obtained in 512 patients at 11±3 days and 1 and 2 years postinfarction to assess LV size, percentage of the LV that was akinetic/dyskinetic (%AD), and LV shape index. LV function was assessed by radionuclide ejection fraction. Two hundred sixty-three patients (51.4%) sustained cardiovascular death and/or LV diastolic dilatation; 279 (54.5%) had cardiovascular death and/or systolic dilatation. In 373 patients with serial echocardiograms, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic sizes increased progressively from baseline to 2 years (both P<.01). More patients with LV dilatation had a decrease in ejection fraction: 24.8% versus 6.8% (P<.001) (diastole) and 25.7% versus 5.3% (P<.001) (systole). Captopril attenuated diastolic LV dilatation at 2 years (P=.048), but this effect was carried over from the first year of therapy because changes in LV size with captopril beyond 1 year were similar to those with placebo. Predictors of cardiovascular death and/or dilatation were age (P=.023), prior infarction (P<.001), lower ejection fraction (P<.001), angina (P=.007), heart failure (P=.002), LV size (P<.001), and infarct size (%AD) (P<.001).

Conclusions Cardiovascular death and/or LV dilatation occurred in >50% of patients by 2 years. LV dilatation is progressive, associated with chamber distortion and deteriorating function that is unaffected by captopril beyond 1 year.


Key Words: remodeling • myocardial infarction • trials


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Left ventricular remodeling after MI can be an insidious process resulting in progressive changes in LV chamber size, shape, muscle mass, and function.1-6 The rise in systolic and diastolic wall stress that accompanies LV dilatation, as well as activation of both circulating neurohormones and local autocrine tropic factors, is believed to be important in sustaining this response.7,8 Progressive LV dilatation post-MI is associated with adverse cardiovascular events9-12 and in particular plays an important role in the development of congestive heart failure.6 Post-MI LV remodeling can be partly attenuated by the early administration of ACE inhibitor therapy,13-20 which is associated with improved survival.18,21-28 However, despite the prognostic importance of LV dilatation after MI, little is known regarding its incidence, for how long after MI this dynamic process continues, or whether long-term use of ACE inhibitor therapy beyond 1 year remains efficacious.

The aims of this study were to quantify the incidence of cardiovascular death and/or LV dilatation in a large population of survivors of acute MI from SAVE18 and to determine the impact of LV dilatation on LV chamber shape and function over a minimum of 2-year follow-up. We assessed whether LV dilatation continued beyond 1 year after MI and, if so, whether this late LV dilatation was attenuated by the continued administration of ACE inhibitor therapy. In addition, we wanted to determine whether any patient demographics or echocardiographic descriptors at baseline predicted increased risk for cardiovascular death and/or progressive LV dilatation.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The SAVE Trial echocardiographic substudy consisted of 512 patients who sustained an acute MI (301 had Q-wave MI) with residual LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction <40%) and were randomized to treatment with captopril or placebo for a minimum duration of 2 years and a mean of 3.5 years.18 Of these 512 patients, 103 died during follow-up; 89 were cardiovascular deaths. An additional 62 either missed, refused, or had repeat echocardiograms of insufficient technical quality to permit quantitative analysis. Three hundred seventy-three patients had serial high-quality two-dimensional echocardiograms at baseline (mean, 11±3 days) and 1 year and 2 years after MI.

Transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiograms of the short axis of the LV were recorded from the left parasternal region at three levels: the mitral valve and the high and mid papillary muscle levels. The long axis of the LV was imaged from the apex in the four-chamber view and in either the apical long axis or apical two-chamber views.

All two-dimensional echocardiograms were submitted to the core laboratory at the Brigham and Women's Hospital for assessment of technical quality and suitability for quantitative analysis. The definition of a technically acceptable two-dimensional echocardiogram was one that included images of both the long and short axes of the LV in a minimum of three of the five views. Two-dimensional echocardiographic images were transferred to the hard disk of a Freeland Medical off-line computer analysis system and digitized to obtain LV cavity areas at end diastole and end systole. LV short-axis cavity areas were summed, and the average short-axis areas at end diastole and end systole were calculated. Similarly, LV long-axis cavity areas were summed, and average long-axis areas were calculated at end diastole and at end systole. Thus, LV size was quantified from multiple orthogonal echocardiographic views and defined as the sum of the average short-axis and average long-axis cavity areas at end diastole and end systole as described previously19 at baseline (mean, 11 days after MI) and 1 and 2 years after MI.

MI size was estimated by two-dimensional echocardiography as the percentage of the total LV cavity perimeter that was either akinetic or dyskinetic in each of the multiple echocardiographic images, and the average value for all images (%AD) was calculated, similar to that described angiographically.29

LV shape index, calculated as the ratio of the average LV short-axis cavity area to average long-axis cavity area at end diastole and end systole, was used as a measure of LV distortion (a ratio of unity would represent a sphere).

LV myocardial areas at end diastole and end systole were calculated from the three parasternal LV short-axis echocardiographic images by subtracting the cavity area from the total epicardial area. The ratio of myocardial to cavity area was used as a surrogate for the ratio of LV mass to volume and is an indirect indicator of wall tension.

LV dilatation was defined using the previously reported two-dimensional echocardiographic reproducibility analysis19 as an increase in LV end-diastolic or end-systolic area above baseline values of >1.96 times the SDs of the difference between the three independent assessments of LV size.19 The overall incidence of post-MI LV dilatation and/or death was an objective ascertainment independent of treatment assignment.

The incidences of LV dilatation in patients randomized to treatment with placebo or captopril were compared at 1 and 2 years after MI, and the interval change from 1 to 2 years was calculated in the two-treatment groups to determine whether LV dilatation occurring beyond 1 year was attenuated by the continued long-term therapy with the ACE inhibitor captopril.

In surviving patients, the effect of LV dilatation on LV function was evaluated with radionuclide angiography. Decreased LV function was defined as a reduction in ejection fraction of >9 units from baseline to the repeat study at the end of the trial. The 9-unit decrease in LV ejection fraction was prespecified18 as an important change in radionuclide ejection fraction that was unlikely to be produced by a technical difference but rather result from a biological change.18

To identify potential predictors of death and/or progressive LV dilatation, we assessed the relationships among the clinical demographics, echocardiographic measurements at baseline, and progressive LV dilatation. The clinical demographics examined included age; sex; heart rate; blood pressure; history of hypertension, diabetes, or prior MI; radionuclide ejection fraction; use of thrombolytic agents, aspirin, diuretics, or ß-adrenergic receptor blockers; percutaneous angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, heart failure, and angina. Baseline echocardiographic measurements were entered into this analysis individually. These measurements included LV cavity areas at end diastole and end systole, an estimate of %AD, LV cavity shape, and the ratio of LV short-axis myocardial-to-cavity areas.

Statistical Analysis
Changes in echocardiographic measurements over time were assessed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA, with time being the "within-subjects" variable. Assessment of the effect of therapy over time was made by evaluating the interaction term in the model. Patients were considered to have developed LV dilatation if they met the criteria previously reported in the SAVE echocardiographic substudy, which was based on the reproducibility analysis.19 Cardiovascular cause of death was established in every case by the mortality committee as described in the parent trial.18 The analyses for predictors of dilatation required the creation of a "time to first dilatation" variable. The event of dilatation and the time of dilatation were noted for each patient in the cohort. If patients did not develop LV dilatation, they were censored (ie, removed from the analysis as a nonevent) at the time of their 2-year echocardiogram. This allowed a Cox proportional hazard analysis, in which we examined the relationships with the occurrence of dilatation, with the time of occurrence being the dependent variable. We were able to examine the relationship between independent variables and the time to first dilatation. The P value, relative risk, and confidence intervals provided for changes in the independent variables are based on the Cox analysis.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The cumulative incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in this echocardiographic SAVE substudy was similar to that occurring in the parent SAVE trial18: 85 patients had a revascularization procedure after randomization, and 74 patients sustained recurrent MI (48 in the first year, 14 in the second year, and 12 thereafter). Of the 512 patients in the echocardiographic cohort, 103 died, 89 of these patients sustained a cardiovascular death, 182 (35.5%) met the criterion for LV dilatation in diastole, and 204 (39.8%) met the criterion for systolic dilatation at 2 years. The combined end point of cardiovascular death and/or diastolic dilatation was reached in 263 patients (51.4%), whereas 279 patients (54.5%) sustained a cardiovascular death and/or had systolic dilatation.

Of the 373 survivors who had serial echocardiograms at baseline and 1 and 2 years; LV end-diastolic cavity area increased progressively from a mean value of 69.6±11.7 cm2 at baseline to 72.1±13.3 cm2 at 1 year (P<.01), and 73.0±14.8 cm2 (P=.02) at 2 years (Fig 1Down). LV end-systolic cavity area increased progressively from a mean of 49.7±11.1 cm2 at baseline to 52.3±14.0 cm2 at 1 year (P<.01) and 53.7±16.2 cm2 (P<.001) at 2 years (Fig 1Down). The number of 2-year survivors who developed LV dilatation, defined by the strict criteria based on the reproducibility analysis, was 113 of 373 (30.3%) at end diastole (P<.01) and 125 of 373 (33.5%) at end systole (P<.01) at 1 year; this increased further to 132 of 373 (35.4%) at end diastole (P<.01) and 144 of 373 (38.6%) at end systole (P<.01) at 2 years, regardless of treatment assignment (Fig 2Down). The effect of captopril on LV enlargement in patients at 1 year has been demonstrated in SAVE patients.19 In this study, we evaluated the treatment effect of captopril on the number of patients who developed LV dilatation and on LV dilatation per se beyond 1 year compared with placebo (Fig 3Down). At 2 years, captopril was still efficacious in attenuating LV dilatation in diastole (P=.048) (Fig 4Down); however, the attenuation of LV dilatation beyond 1 year was a "carried over" effect from the first year of therapy, after which LV sizes at end diastole and end systole in the captopril increased in parallel with the placebo treatment group (Fig 4Down). This was best demonstrated by comparing the interval changes in LV size at end diastole and at end systole between 1 and 2 years, which were similar in the captopril versus the placebo treatment arms in the 373 patients who survived and had serial echocardiograms (Table 1Down).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. LV cavity areas at end diastole (left) and end systole (right) in 373 SAVE patients increased progressively and significantly from baseline to 1 and 2 years after MI, respectively.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The percentage of SAVE patients who developed LV dilatation in diastole (left) and systole (right) increased significantly from 1 to 2 years after MI.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The absolute number of patients who developed LV dilatation in diastole (left), and systole (right) at 1 and 2 years after MI in the captopril and placebo treatment groups.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. LV cavity areas at end diastole and end systole in the captopril and placebo treatment groups at 1 and 2 years after MI. P<.001, for the effect of time (within-subject variable). P=.107, for the effect of treatment. P=.048, for the timextreatment interaction, reflecting an attenuation in the change in LV size in the captopril-treated group in diastole but not in systole.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Interval Changes in LV Diastolic and Systolic Cavity Areas From 1 to 2 Years After Infarction in Placebo and Captopril Groups

LV dilatation from baseline through 2-year follow-up was associated with progressive LV distortion with increase in the LV shape index toward a more spherical configuration (Table 2Down, Fig 5Down). In patients who met the criteria for LV dilatation, the degree of distortion to a more spherical ventricle was even greater (Table 2Down, Fig 5Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Changes in Echo LV Shape Index With Time in the 373 Patients With and Without LV Dilatation Who Survived 2 Years



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Changes in LV shape index at end diastole and end systole with time after MI in patients who developed LV dilatation compared with those who did not. In diastole, the effect associated with dilatation (the between-group variable in this case) was shape. P<.001, associated with the within-group variable time. P<.001, dilatationxtime interaction. P<.001, in systole, the effect on shape associated with dilatation (the between-group variable in this case). P<.001, associated with the within-group variable time. P<.001, the dilatationxtime interaction.

Progressive LV dilatation was also accompanied by deterioration in LV performance, shown by the greater number of patients who experienced a 9-unit fall in radionuclide ejection fraction from baseline to the end of study. Of the 373 2-year survivors, 362 (97%) had both initial and end-of-study radionuclide ejection fractions determined, whereas 11 had no end-of-study ejection fraction determination. Forty-seven of the 362 patients (13%) had a fall in ejection fraction of >9 units. A significantly greater proportion of patients who met the criteria for LV dilatation had a 9-unit fall in ejection fraction: 24.8% with diastolic dilatation versus 6.8% without dilatation (P<.001) and 25.7% with systolic LV dilatation versus 5.3% without dilatation (P<.001) by 2 years after MI (Table 3Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Patients With LV Dilatation (Dilators) and Without Dilatation (Nondilators) With 9-Unit Decrease in LV Ejection Fraction

Of the multiple baseline clinical and echocardiographic demographics assessed in a Cox proportional hazard model, patient age (P=.023), a history of prior MI (P<.001), lower radionuclide LV ejection fraction (P<.001), development of angina (P=.007), baseline heart failure (P=.002), use of diuretics (P=.018), presence of an S3 gallop (P=.03), increased heart rate (P=.009), baseline echocardiographic measures of LV areas at end diastole (P<.001) and at end systole (P<.001), and MI size (%AD) (P<.001) all predicted cardiovascular death and/or LV dilatation (Table 4Down). In addition, two-dimensional echocardiographic estimates of cavity shape index and muscle-to-cavity area ratio were strongly predictive of cardiovascular death (P=.003; P<.001) and development of severe heart failure (P=.006; P=.002) but did not predict repeat MI (Table 5Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Predictors of Cardiovascular Death and Left Ventricular Diastolic Dilatation


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Effect of Baseline LV Muscle to Cavity Area on Clinical Outcome After MI


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
LV remodeling after acute MI is stimulated by the interaction of a number of factors such as the magnitude of the loss of contractile elements, the abrupt alteration in systolic and diastolic loading conditions, activation of circulating neurohormones and local autocrine tropic factors, and patency of the infarct-related coronary artery.1-8,11,30-32 In experimental animal models of MI and in increasing numbers of studies of acute MI in humans, LV dilatation has been shown to commence within the first hours of coronary artery occlusion.4-6,13,17,18 LV size early after MI has emerged as a powerful predictor of long-term survival,9,10,19 and the progressive dilatation that continues after the infarct zone has healed histologically is associated with the development of progressive LV dysfunction and congestive heart failure.6 Furthermore, the extent of the increase in LV size after MI relates to mortality and the risk of experiencing a major cardiovascular adverse event.19 This late phase of LV dilatation involves the entire ventricle, has a more protracted time course, and has only been documented in small groups of selected patients followed up for variable lengths of time after MI.6,29

This prospective study of a large cohort of after MI patients with impaired LV function (ejection fractions <40%) demonstrates that >50% sustain cardiovascular death and/or develop LV dilatation during the initial 3.5-year follow-up period. Of the survivors of acute MI who had serial echocardiograms at baseline and 1 and 2 years; more than one third had developed LV dilatation by 2 years. This latter figure underestimates the true incidence of LV dilatation after MI because this subanalysis required that all patients survive 2 years and censored the highest-risk group of patients who died from a cardiovascular cause within the 2 years of follow-up (89 patients). Importantly, there was progressive LV dilatation beyond 1 year with significant increases in the mean values for diastolic and systolic cavity areas from baseline to 1 year and from 1 to 2 years, indicating that in a proportion of patients, LV remodeling continues insidiously. In this SAVE echocardiographic study population, LV dilatation after MI correlated with the echocardiographic estimate of MI size at baseline (%AD) (Table 4Up). In addition, increasing LV size at end diastole and end systole was associated with increasing distortion of cavity shape and progressive deterioration in LV performance compared with those who did not develop ventricular dilatation35 (Tables 2Up and 3Up; Fig 5Up).

Deterioration in LV function with progressive LV dilatation was demonstrated by the significantly larger number of patients who experienced a 9-unit reduction in radionuclide ejection fraction (from baseline to the end of study), in whom there was a threefold to fourfold increased risk of death compared with patients who did not develop LV dilatation. In a previous study, we demonstrated that LV dilatation is strongly associated with adverse cardiovascular events at long-term follow-up.19 Echocardiographic estimates of baseline LV ratio of short-axis muscle to cavity area and of shape index used in this study also emerged as powerful predictors of survival and adverse cardiovascular events (Tables 4Up and 5Up).

Progressive LV dilatation is not a universal finding after MI even in SAVE patients with LV dysfunction and ejection fractions of <40%. Although the precise mechanisms by which LV dilatation is obviated after MI have not been elucidated, it may relate to the combination of a number of factors, including patency of the infarct-related coronary artery,30,31 recovery of stunning, blunting of neurohormonal activation,8 interaction between neurohormones and the fibrinolytic system, initial MI size,4 and adequate LV hypertrophy to normalize wall stress, reduce wall tension, and minimize LV dilatation and distortion.

Post-MI LV remodeling has generally been regarded as a process that is completed over a period of months, as the myocardium remote from the infarct zone dilates and hypertrophies to offset the change in loading conditions induced by the early loss of contractile elements when the repair of the infarct zone is completed histologically. Our study indicates that LV dilatation can continue beyond 1 year, long after the infarct repair is completed; with further increases in end-diastolic and end-systolic chamber sizes occurring in more than one third of survivors by 2 years.

Early LV dilatation after MI can be attenuated by the administration of ACE inhibitors,13-20 and the linkage between attenuation of LV dilatation and reduction in adverse cardiovascular events has been demonstrated.19 Although the effect of ACE inhibitor therapy on attenuating LV dilatation was still present at 2 years compared with placebo; this effect was a "carry over" from the initial year of therapy. Evidence for this was that there were parallel increases in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic sizes beyond 1 year in the captopril and placebo treatment groups such that the interval changes between 1 and 2 years were similar in the two groups. This novel observation suggests that patients appeared to "escape" from ACE inhibitor therapy beyond 1 year in terms of its impact on attenuation of LV dilatation.

Early identification of patients prone to cardiovascular death and LV dilatation is of paramount importance to stratify those at high risk in whom prolonged treatment (up to 1 year) might reduce the likelihood of severe adverse cardiovascular events. LV end-systolic size and ejection fraction have been previously shown to be powerful predictors of survival9,10,19; in the present study, we demonstrated that echocardiographic estimates of infarct size, myocardial-to-cavity area ratio, and cavity distortion (shape index) also correlated strongly with cardiovascular death and severe congestive heart failure, although not with repeat MI (Tables 2Up, 4Up, and 5Up). Because little information is available regarding baseline demographics that predict cardiovascular death and/or progressive LV dilatation, we examined a large number of baseline clinical demographics, LV geometry by transthoracic echocardiography, and therapeutic interventions that are all well known to have a direct impact on survival. The baseline descriptors that predicted cardiovascular death and/or progressive LV dilatation were patient age, resting radionuclide ejection fraction, history of prior MI, development of angina, baseline heart failure (increased resting heart rate, an S3 gallop, use of diuretics), and echocardiographic measurements of LV cavity areas and %AD (Table 4Up).

We conclude from this large cohort of SAVE patients that cardiovascular death and/or LV dilatation occurs in >50% of survivors of acute MI with LV dysfunction in the initial 3.5 years of follow-up. Progressive LV dilatation is associated with distortion of ventricular shape, deterioration in systolic function, and increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Late LV dilatation beyond 1 year appears to be refractory to continued treatment with captopril in this study, indicating that patients may escape from the attenuating effect of ACE inhibitor therapy on LV dilatation. Patients with a history of prior MI, low ejection fraction, early heart failure, or older age and those demonstrating continued changes in echocardiographic indices of LV geometry and function identify a particularly high-risk group for progressive dilatation and adverse cardiovascular events.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
%AD = myocardial infarction size
LV = left ventricle, ventricular
MI = myocardial infarction
SAVE = Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Trial

Received June 19, 1997; accepted August 2, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Kostuk WJ, Kazamias TM, Gander MP, Simon AL, Ross J Jr. Left ventricular size after acute myocardial infarction: serial changes and their prognostic significance. Circulation. 1973;47:1174-1179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Erlebacher JA, Weiss JL, Easton LW, Kallman C, Weisfeldt ML, Bulkley BH. Late effects of acute infarct dilatation on heart size: a two-dimensional echocardiographic study. Am J Cardiol. 1982;49:1120-1126.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Erlebacher JA, Weiss JL, Bulkley BJ, Weisfeldt ML. Early dilation of the infarcted segment in acute transmural myocardial infarction: role of infarct expansion in acute left ventricular enlargement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;4:201-08.[Abstract]
  4. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: experimental observations and clinical implications. Circulation. 1990;81:1161-1172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Pfeffer JM, Pfeffer MA, Fletcher PJ, Braunwald E. Progressive ventricular remodeling in rat with myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:H1406-H1414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Gaudron P, Eilles C, Kugler I, Ertl G. Progressive left ventricular dysfunction and remodeling after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1993;87:755-763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. McAlpine HM, Morton JJ, Leckie B, Rumley A, Gillen G, Dargie HJ. Neuroendocrine activation after acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1988;60:117-124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Rouleau JL, de Champlain J, Klein M, Bichet D, Moye L, Packer M, Dagenais GR, Sussex B, Arnold JM, Sestier F, Parker JO, McEwan P, Bernstein V, Cuddy E, Lamas GA, Gottlieb SS, McCans J, Nadeau C, Delage F, Hamm P, Pfeffer MA. Activation of neurohumoral systems in post infarction left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:390-8.[Abstract]
  9. Norris RM, Barnaby PF, Brandt PWT, Geary GG, Whitlock RML, Wild CJ, Barratt-Boyes BG. Prognosis after recovery from first acute myocardial infarction: determinants of reinfarction and sudden death. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:408-413.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, Brandt PWT, Whitlock RML, Wild CJ. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987;76:44-51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Warren SE, Royal H, Markis JE, Grossman W, McKay R. Time course of left ventricular dilation after myocardial infarction: influence of infarct-related artery and success of coronary thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:12-19.[Abstract]
  12. Jeremy RW, Allman KC, Bautovitch G, Harris PJ. Patterns of left ventricular dilation during the six months after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:304-310.[Abstract]
  13. Ertl G, Kloner RA, Alexander RA, Braunwald E. Limitation of experimental infarct size by an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Circulation. 1982;65:40-48.[Free Full Text]
  14. Pfeffer JM, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Influence of chronic captopril therapy on the infarcted left ventricle of the rat. Circ Res. 1985;57:84-95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Pfeffer MA, Pfeffer JM, Steinberg C, Finn P. Survival after an experimental myocardial infarction: beneficial effects of long-term therapy with captopril. Circulation. 1985;72:406-412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Pfeffer MA, Lamas GA, Vaughan DE, Parisi AF, Braunwald E. Effect of captopril on progressive ventricular dilatation after anterior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:80-86.[Abstract]
  17. Sharpe N, Smith H, Murphy J, Greaves S, Hart H, Gamble G. Early prevention of left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. Lancet. 1991;337:872-876.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, Basta L, Brown EJ, Cuddy TE, Davis BR, Geltman EM, Godman S, Flaker GC, Klein M, Lamas GA, Packer M, Rouleau J, Rouleau JL, Rutherford JR, Wertheimer JH, Hawkins CM, on behalf of the SAVE Investigators. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction: results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Trial. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:669-677.[Abstract]
  19. St John Sutton M, Pfeffer MA, Plappert T, Rouleau J-L, Moye LA, Dagenais GR, Lamas GA, Klein M, Sussex B, Goldman S, Menapace FJ, Parker JO, Lewis S, Sestier F, Gorrdon DF, McEwan P, Bernstein V, Braunwald E. Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements are major predictors of adverse cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction: the protective effects of captopril. Circulation. 1994;89:68-75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Greenberg B, Quinones MA, Koilpillai C, Limacher M, Shindler D, Benedict C, Shelton B, for the SOLVD Investigators. Effects of long-term enalapril therapy on cardiac structure and function in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. results of the SOLVD Echocardiography Substudy. Circulation. 1995;91:2573-2581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalopril on mortality and the development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:685-691.[Abstract]
  22. The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study Investigators. Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. Lancet. 1993;342:821-828.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI-3). Effects of lisinopril and transdermal glyceryl trinitrate singly and together on 6-week mortality and ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1994;343:1115-1122.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Ambrosioni E, Borghi C, Magnani B, for the Survival of Myocardial Infarction Long-term Evaluation (SMILE) Study Investigators. The effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor zofenopril on mortality and morbidity after anterior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:80-85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Foy SG, Crozier IG, Turner JG, Richards AM, Frampton CM, Nicholls MG, Ikram H. Comparison of enalapril vs captopril on left ventricular function and survival three months after acute myocardial infarction (the `PRACTICAL' Study). Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:1180-1186.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. ISIS-4 Collaborative Group. Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1995;345:669-685.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Chinese Cardiac Study Collaborative Group. Oral captopril versus placebo among 13 634 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction: interim report from the Chinese Cardiac Study (CCS-1). Lancet. 1995;345:686-687.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Pfeffer MA. ACE inhibition in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:118-120.[Free Full Text]
  29. Lamas GA, Pfeffer MA. Increased left ventricular volume following myocardial infarction in man. Am Heart J. 1986;111:30-35.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17 187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-2. Lancet. 1988;2:349-360.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Jeremy RW, Hackworthy RA, Bautovitch G, Hutton BF, Harris PJ. Infarct artery perfusion and changes in left ventricular volume in the month after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9:989-995.[Abstract]
  32. The GUSTO Angiographic Investigators. The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary-artery patency, ventricular function, and survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1615-1622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kingma JH, van Gilst WH, Peels CH, Dambrink J-HE, Verheught FWA, Wielenga RP, for the CATS Investigators. Acute intervention with captopril during thrombolysis in patients with first anterior myocardial infarction: results from the Captopril and Thrombolysis Study (CATS). Eur Heart J. 1994;15:898-907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Olivetti G, Capasso JM, Sonnenblick EH, Anversa P. Side-to-side slippage of myocytes participates in ventricular wall remodelling acutely after myocardial infarction in rats. Circ Res.. 1990;67:23-34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Mitchell GF, Lamas GA, Vaughan DE, Pfeffer MA. Left ventricular remodeling in the year after first anterior myocardial infarction: a quantitative analysis of contractile segment lengths and ventricular shape. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1136-1144.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
L Ingle, J G F Cleland, and A L Clark
Perception of symptoms is out of proportion to cardiac pathology in patients with "diastolic heart failure"
Heart, June 1, 2008; 94(6): 748 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Bujak, H. J. Kweon, K. Chatila, N. Li, G. Taffet, and N. G. Frangogiannis
Aging-Related Defects Are Associated With Adverse Cardiac Remodeling in a Mouse Model of Reperfused Myocardial Infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 8, 2008; 51(14): 1384 - 1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Sakamoto, L. M. Parish, H. Hamamoto, L. P. Ryan, T. J. Eperjesi, T. J. Plappert, B. M. Jackson, M. G. St John-Sutton, J. H. Gorman III, and R. C. Gorman
Effect of Reperfusion on Left Ventricular Regional Remodeling Strains After Myocardial Infarction
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1528 - 1536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Tumkosit, C. G. Martin, E. Bayram, T. M. Morgan, K. S. Lane, P. Rerkpattanapipat, C. A. Hamilton, K. M. Link, and W. G. Hundley
Left Ventricular Spherical Remodeling and Apical Myocardial Relaxation: Cardiovascular MR Imaging Measurement of Myocardial Segments
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 411 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Kloner and D. S. Cannom
Uncertainty on the Use of Aldosterone Antagonists for Primary Therapy for Sudden Cardiac Death in the Setting of Implanted Devices
Circulation, June 12, 2007; 115(23): 2983 - 2989.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G. Andreka, M. Vertesaljai, G. Szantho, G. Font, Z. Piroth, G. Fontos, E. D Juhasz, L. Szekely, Z. Szelid, M. S Turner, et al.
Remote ischaemic postconditioning protects the heart during acute myocardial infarction in pigs
Heart, June 1, 2007; 93(6): 749 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. Aronson, N. Goldsher, R. Zukermann, M. Kapeliovich, J. Lessick, D. Mutlak, S. Dabbah, W. Markiewicz, R. Beyar, H. Hammerman, et al.
Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation and Risk of Heart Failure After Myocardial Infarction
Arch Intern Med, November 27, 2006; 166(21): 2362 - 2368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Zhou, P. D. Acton, and V. A. Ferrari
Imaging Stem Cells Implanted in Infarcted Myocardium
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 2094 - 2106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. Burkhoff and A. S. Wechsler
Surgical ventricular remodeling: A balancing act on systolic and diastolic properties.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2006; 132(3): 459 - 463.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
X.-J. Du, X.-M. Gao, H. Kiriazis, X.-L. Moore, Z. Ming, Y. Su, A. M. Finch, R. A. Hannan, A. M. Dart, and R. M. Graham
Transgenic {alpha}1A-adrenergic activation limits post-infarct ventricular remodeling and dysfunction and improves survival
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2006; 71(4): 735 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
B. Silke
Beta-blockade in CHF: pathophysiological considerations
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., June 1, 2006; 8(suppl_C): C13 - C18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. F. Berry, A. J. Engler, Y. J. Woo, T. J. Pirolli, L. T. Bish, V. Jayasankar, K. J. Morine, T. J. Gardner, D. E. Discher, and H. L. Sweeney
Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): H2196 - H2203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
R. M. Lang, M. Bierig, R. B. Devereux, F. A. Flachskampf, E. Foster, P. A. Pellikka, M. H. Picard, M. J. Roman, J. Seward, J. Shanewise, et al.
Recommendations for chamber quantification
Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2006; 7(2): 79 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
D. Vanhoutte, M. Schellings, Y. Pinto, and S. Heymans
Relevance of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors after myocardial infarction: A temporal and spatial window
Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2006; 69(3): 604 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. A. Ribeiro, C. E. da Costa, M. M. Lopes, A. N. Albuquerque, F. Antoniali, G. A. A. Reinert, and K. G. Franchini
Left ventricular reconstruction benefits patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and non-viable myocardium
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 29(2): 196 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. D. Solomon, N. Anavekar, H. Skali, J. J.V. McMurray, K. Swedberg, S. Yusuf, C. B. Granger, E. L. Michelson, D. Wang, S. Pocock, et al.
Influence of Ejection Fraction on Cardiovascular Outcomes in a Broad Spectrum of Heart Failure Patients
Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24): 3738 - 3744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
S. H. Hohnloser
Ventricular Arrhythmias: Antiadrenergic Therapy for the Patient with Coronary Artery Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, October 1, 2005; 10(4_suppl): S23 - S31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. S. Blom, R. Mukherjee, J. J. Pilla, A. S. Lowry, W. M. Yarbrough, J. T. Mingoia, J. W. Hendrick, R. E. Stroud, J. E. McLean, J. Affuso, et al.
Cardiac Support Device Modifies Left Ventricular Geometry and Myocardial Structure After Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9): 1274 - 1283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. H. Drazner
The Transition From Hypertrophy to Failure: How Certain Are We?
Circulation, August 16, 2005; 112(7): 936 - 938.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. Levine and E. Schwammenthal
Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation on the Threshold of a Solution: From Paradoxes to Unifying Concepts
Circulation, August 2, 2005; 112(5): 745 - 758.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. D. Solomon, H. Skali, N. S. Anavekar, M. Bourgoun, S. Barvik, J. K. Ghali, J. W. Warnica, M. Khrakovskaya, J. M. O. Arnold, Y. Schwartz, et al.
Changes in Ventricular Size and Function in Patients Treated With Valsartan, Captopril, or Both After Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, June 28, 2005; 111(25): 3411 - 3419.
[Abstract] [Full Text]