(Circulation. 1997;96:302-307.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Human Population Laboratory, Public Health Institute/California Department of Health Services, Berkeley, and the Department of Community Health and General Practice, Research Institute of Public Health, University of Kuopio, Finland (R.S., J.T.S.).
Correspondence to Dr John Lynch, The Human Population Laboratory, Public Health Institute, 2151 Berkeley Way, Annex 2, Suite 300, Berkeley, CA 94704. E-mail jwlynch{at}emf.net
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We investigated the association between job demands, economic reward, and the 4-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis in a population-based sample of 940 Finnish men. Data from the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study were used to estimate changes in plaque height, maximum and mean intima-media thicknesses across combinations of job demands, and income. Associations were examined in relation to atherosclerotic risk factors and were stratified by baseline levels of atherosclerosis and prevalent ischemic heart disease. Men who had jobs with high demands and low economic rewards had significantly greater 4-year progression of plaque height (0.33 mm, P=.008) and maximum intima-media thickness (0.32, P=.03) than men with low-demand, high-income jobs. The magnitude of these differences was not greatly attenuated by risk factor adjustment and did not differ when examined by the level of workplace resources, social support, or employment status. Larger differences were observed in a subsample of men who had more advanced atherosclerosis at baseline.
Conclusions These results show that men with demanding work that produces little economic reward have significantly greater progression of carotid atherosclerosis than more advantaged men. The relationship between job demands and health should be understood in a broad framework of interacting economic conditions, social circumstances, and behaviors that cascade over the life course and may ultimately contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality.
Key Words: work income stress atherosclerosis ultrasound
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to examine the association between workplace factors and the 4-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis using three indicators of the atherosclerotic process: maximum IMT, plaque height, and mean IMT. In earlier studies, we reported both cross-sectional14 and prospective15 inverse associations between measures of socioeconomic status and IMT. It is also possible that the level of economic rewards potentiates the impact of work demands. In light of these findings and the fact that low socioeconomic status groups are likely to have higher lifetime exposure to poor working conditions, we assessed the interaction of job conditions and socioeconomic status (measured by income) on IMT progression. Extensive information on baseline levels of atherosclerotic risk factors and prevalent disease enabled the association between workplace demands, economic reward, and atheroslerotic progression to be examined with adjustment for known risk factors and stratified by both prevalent ischemic heart disease (IHD) and the extent of atherosclerosis at baseline.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At baseline, subjects were recruited in two waves. The first group comprised 1516 men 54 years of age; the second comprised an age-stratified sample of 1116 men who were 42, 48, 54, or 60 years of age. Ultrasonographic assessment of carotid atherosclerosis at baseline was conducted between February 1987 and December 1989 on the second wave of participants only. There were no systematic differences between the two waves of recruitment for the study other than the differences in age distribution. A 4-year follow-up examination was conducted between March 1991 and December 1993 on those men who had previously undergone ultrasonographic examination of the carotid arteries at baseline.
Follow-up examinations were conducted during the same month as the baseline and at the same time of day. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years (range, 3.9 to 4.7 years). Of the 1229 participants who were eligible for the follow-up exams, 52 had died, were suffering from severe illness, or had migrated from the area. Of the remainder, 139 could not be contacted or refused to participate. Information on workplace demands, economic reward, progression of carotid atherosclerosis, and covariates was available for 940 men. There were 221, 228, 258, and 233 men in the 42-, 48-, 54-, and 60-year-old age groups, respectively. In this sample, 71 men acted as control subjects, and 68 men were participants in the treatment group of an unrelated clinical trial of pravastatin.18
Assessment of Carotid Atherosclerotic Progression
Atherosclerotic progression was assessed with high-resolution
B-mode ultrasonographic scanning of a 1.0- to 1.5-cm section of the
left and right common carotid arteries (CCAs) below the carotid bulbs.
Images were focused on the posterior (far) wall with the subject
supine. At baseline, ultrasonographic scanning was conducted by use of
the ATL UM4 duplex ultrasound system with 10-MHz sector transducer
(Advanced Technology Laboratories). The Biosound Phase 2 equipped with
an 8- or 10-MHz annular array probe was used at the 4-year follow-up
examinations. Wedge phantom studies of this system, calibrated against
an RMI 414B tissue phantom, have demonstrated measurement precision of
±0.03 mm.8 A total of five technicians, each trained
for at least 6 months, conducted both the baseline and the 4-year
follow-up scannings, which were also recorded on
videocassettes.
Video frames of the B-mode scanning were digitized with the Data Translation DT2861 video frame grabber installed on a 80486 PC and a Panasonic AG7355 VCR. IMT was assessed with Prosound software, which incorporates an edge-detection algorithm specifically designed for use with ultrasound scanning and enables automatic detection, tracking, and recording of the lumen/intima and media/adventitia interfaces (University of Southern California).19 On average, 100 estimates of the distance between these interfaces were recorded over the 1.0- to 1.5-cm section of each CCA. The IMT of the posterior wall was measured as the distance from the leading edge of the first echogenic line to the leading edge of the second echogenic line, as explained earlier in detail.7 Measurements of the near wall were not conducted because of greater measurement variability.20
The present study uses three measures of IMT. Maximum IMT was
defined as the average of the maximum IMT in the right and left CCAs.
Plaque height was defined as the difference between the maximum and
minimum IMT recordings averaged over the right and left CCAs,
and mean IMT was defined as the mean of the
100 IMT readings from
each CCA. These measures were conceptualized to represent
potentially different aspects or stages of atherosclerotic progression.
Maximum IMT was thought to provide an assessment of how deeply the
greatest lesion intruded into the lumen in this segment of the CCA. The
measurement of plaque height was conceptualized to be sensitive to the
roughness of the arterial wall by representing
the range of IMT and thus assessing how steeply atherosclerotic lesions
protruded into the lumen. Mean IMT was seen as an overall measure of
the process of atherosclerosis. Progression of carotid
atherosclerosis was calculated as the arithmetic
difference between the baseline and 4-year follow-up values for each of
the three measures: maximum IMT, plaque height, and mean IMT.
Baseline IMT recordings were also classified by one physician into four categories: (1) no atherosclerotic lesion, (2) intima-media thickening, (3) nonstenotic plaque, and (4) large, stenotic plaque. "Intima-media thickening" was defined as >1.0 mm between the lumen-intima interface and the media-adventitia interface in the CCAs below the carotid bulbs. Nonstenotic plaque was defined as a distinct area of mineralization or focal protrusion into the lumen. A plaque was defined as stenotic if it obstructed >20% of the lumen diameter.7
Assessment of Workplace Demands and Economic Reward
At the baseline examinations, participants completed detailed
questionnaires that included items on aspects of their work environment
and income. Items that conformed to important theoretical domains
discussed in the literature were considered for inclusion in the
measurement of workplace demands.4 In accordance with
suggestions made in this literature, items on risk of unemployment,
accidents, and physical exertion were included to supplement the
questions about psychological demands. Participants were asked to rate
on a Likert-type scale (0 to 4) how much mental strain or stress each
of the following things caused them at work: excessive supervision of
time schedules, troublesome supervisors, troublesome fellow workers,
job responsibility, poorly defined tasks and responsibilities, risk of
accidents, risk of unemployment, irregular work schedules, and the
mental strain of work. They also were asked how often they had work
deadlines and how much stress this caused them and were requested to
rate the physical strain of their work. Scores for the demands scale
were imputed on the basis of an average of nonmissing values for men
who had no more than two missing items (n=63). Men who had more missing
information than this were excluded from the analyses (n=42).
The 11 individual items were dichotomized at the midpoint of the rating
scale so that only when men reported that the particular aspect of work
caused them more than "average" strain or stress were their
responses considered positive. The 11 dichotomized items were then
summed to form the workplace demands scale, which had high internal
consistency (Cronbach's
=0.78). The scale was
dichotomized so that men in the top 30% of total workplace demands
were considered "high." In previous analyses, this
dichotomization had been shown to predict mortality and acute
myocardial infarction in this population.21 Economic
reward was assessed by self-reported income, which was dichotomized so
that the lowest 20% of income earners were considered "low."
Previous analyses in the same population had shown that men in
the bottom quintile of the income distribution had accelerated
progression of atherosclerosis15 and also
were at greatly elevated risk of mortality and acute myocardial
infarction.22
Assessment of Covariates
Lipoproteins were separated from unfrozen plasma within 3 days
of sampling. HDL and LDL fractions were separated from fresh plasma by
use of both ultracentrifugation and precipitation. The
cholesterol content of all lipoprotein fractions was
measured enzymatically (CHOD-PAP cholesterol method,
Boehringer Mannheim) on the day after the last
spin.23 Blood pressure was measured with a random-zero
sphygmomanometer with participants in both supine and sitting positions
after 5- minute rests in each position. Three systolic and
diastolic pressures were taken and averaged. Average
systolic pressure was used in this analysis. Body mass
index was calculated by dividing the subject's weight by the square of
his height (kilogram per square meter). Alcohol consumption was
assessed by instructed dietary recording for a 4-day period and
for the previous 12 months by a self-administered
questionnaire.24 Smoking was measured by questionnaire,
and participants were classified for this analysis as never
smoked, former smoker, and current smoker (measured in pack-years).
Treatment for hypertension or hyperlipidemia was
assessed by a review of medications.
Assessment of Prevalent IHD
Subjects were considered to have prevalent IHD at baseline if
they had any history of prior myocardial infarction or angina pectoris,
currently used antianginal medication, or had positive findings of
angina from the London School of Hygiene Cardiovascular
Questionnaire.25
Statistical Methods
The association between workplace demands, economic reward, and
progression of IMT was assessed by estimating the mean change in each
measure of IMT (maximum thickness, mean thickness and plaque height)
for each combination of demands and economic reward. The
analyses were conducted by use of the GLM procedure in SAS
version 6.09 on a Sun Sparc Station II.26 This procedure
allows age-adjusted, least-squares mean values of IMT to be estimated
and contrasted for each combination of demands and economic reward
while simultaneously controlling for baseline IMT and other
covariates.
We were interested in comparing differences in mean IMT progression between the low-demand, high-income group (reference category) and the low-demand, low-income; high-demand, high-income; and high-demand, low-income groups. These three pairwise contrasts were adjusted for multiple comparisons with Holm's procedure as described by Aickin and Gensler.27 In addition to age, baseline levels of IMT, and covariates, all estimates were adjusted for participation in the clinical trial of pravastatin, the zooming depth of the ultrasound scan, and separate indicator variables for the individual technicians who conducted the scans.7
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Workplace Demands, Economic Reward, and IMT Progression
The impact of workplace demands on atherosclerotic progression of
maximum IMT and plaque height depended on the level of economic rewards
(see the Figure
). There were important interactions
between workplace demands and economic rewards in relation to the
progression of maximum IMT (cross-product interaction term,
P=.18) and plaque height (cross-product interaction
term, P=.02), but this effect was not observed for changes
in mean IMT. Men with high levels of workplace demands and low economic
rewards had significantly greater average progression in the maximum
wall thickness of the CCA (0.32 mm, P=.03) compared
with men with low demands and high economic rewards (0.26 mm). Men
with high demands and low economic rewards also had significantly
greater progression of plaque height (0.33 mm, P=.008)
compared with men with low demands and high incomes (0.27 mm).
These patterns were not evident in relation to changes in mean IMT, for
which there was no interaction between workplace demands and economic
rewards. Low-income men, regardless of their levels of work demands,
had a higher mean progression of IMT. The magnitude of the associations
between work demands, economic rewards, and progression of maximum
thickness and plaque height was largely unaffected by adjustment for
atherosclerotic risk factors. In other analyses (not shown),
these associations did not differ when examined by the level of
workplace resources, social support at work, or employment status.
|
Workplace Demands, Economic Reward, and IMT Progression Stratified
by Prevalent IHD and the Degree of Atherosclerosis
at Baseline
Table 3
presents the associations between work
demands, economic rewards, and changes in plaque height according to
prevalent IHD and the extent of atherosclerosis at
baseline. In men who had more advanced atherosclerosis
(ie, presence of stenosis
20% lumen diameter or evidence of
nonstenotic plaque) and prevalent IHD at baseline, the
combination of high demands and low economic rewards was associated
with the largest mean increases in plaque height (0.40 mm).
Similarly, men with high demands and low incomes who had advanced
atherosclerotic disease but no history of prevalent IHD at baseline had
the largest changes in plaque height (0.40 mm), whereas men with
low demands and high incomes had a mean change of only 0.24 mm.
There were no differences in progression of plaque height between the
demandseconomic rewards groups for men who were free of IHD and had
no advanced atherosclerotic disease. Although Table 3
presents only
data for changes in plaque height, the pattern of results described for
the analyses stratified by prevalent IHD and extent of
atherosclerosis was generally consistent across
the other measures of IMT progression.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The magnitude of these relationships did not differ by the level of workplace resources and social support or by employment status and was largely unaffected by adjustment for known atherosclerotic risk factors. However, workplace demands and income are associated with baseline levels of IMT, atherogenic risk factors, and changes in those risk factors over time. Analyzing the association of demands and economic reward with changes in carotid atherosclerosis with adjustment for baseline levels of IMT and atherogenic risk factors may be somewhat problematic. Thus, the lack of confounding effects from the atherogenic risk factors should not necessarily be interpreted as evidence that the association between high workplace demands, low income, and progression of carotid atherosclerosis is independent of these risk factors. Furthermore, we have previously reported that the cross-sectional association between income and carotid atherosclerosis in the same population was largely mediated by a similar group of atherosclerotic risk factors.14
Although these findings demonstrated a role for high work demands and low economic reward in the progression of IMT, we conducted stratified analyses to identify whether the associations differed by the extent of atherosclerosis and prevalent IHD at baseline. The combination of high job demands and low economic reward was strongly associated with larger changes in IMT, but only for men who had some degree of advanced atherosclerosis at baseline. In these subsamples, the magnitude of change did not differ by the presence of IHD at baseline. The lack of association between work demands, income, and changes in IMT for men who were free of IHD and had little evidence of atherosclerotic thickening at baseline suggests that the impact of the demands-income imbalance is more important in later stages of the disease process. Although the differential pathological importance of changes in measures of maximum thickness and plaque height remains to be clearly established, it seems reasonable to suggest that high work demands, combined with low economic rewards, are related to the development of focal lesions that protrude into the lumen and increase the surface roughness of the CCAs. The development of roughened arterial walls with steeply sided projections into the lumen can subject the lesion to increased shear stress and flow turbulence, raising the potential for plaque instability, fissuring, and possible rupture.
Several issues must be considered before conclusions can be drawn from these results. First, the measure of workplace demands used in these analyses may have been subject to a reporting bias because it was based on a self-assessment of the extent of stress or strain associated with psychosocial aspects of work. Although the most accurate assessment of job demands would be achieved by a combination of subjective and objective measures, high correlations between subjective assessments and expert ratings of job conditions have been demonstrated.29 Furthermore, we do not believe that bias in the self-reporting of job demands could explain why greater changes in arterial wall thickness were observed in men who had high demand-low income jobs, even if they were free of IHD at baseline.
Second, the assessment of job demands and economic reward was based on a single measurement and does not take into account changes in job exposures and income over time. Moreover, structural alterations to the Finnish economy have seen large increases in unemployment and changes in the occupational structure of the region both before and during the period of this study.30 However, our results were unchanged in stratified analyses (not shown) that excluded men who reported any change in job title over the last 10 years and in other analyses that excluded men who were either unemployed or retired at baseline. Third, because our findings are based on a population of men in eastern Finland, they need to be replicated in women.
This study is the first in a large unselected sample to show strong relationships between workplace factors, economic rewards, and progression of atherosclerotic vascular disease. These findings add to the evidence that factors associated with work are important in the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease before the appearance of clinically relevant and more distal manifestations of the disease process. They are entirely consistent with a previous study in this population that demonstrated that the combination of high work demands and low economic reward was prospectively associated with a twofold increased risk of incident acute myocardial infarction.21
The differences in atherosclerotic progression between high-demand, low-income and low-demand, high-income men observed in these data have potentially important clinical and public health interpretations. Although there is little information on the relationship between carotid atherosclerotic progression and clinical events, Salonen and Salonen7 have demonstrated cross-sectionally that a 0.1-mm difference in maximum IMT was associated with an 11% increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (95% confidence interval, 6% to 16%, P<.001).
The evidence presented here indicates that jobs with high demands and low economic rewards are associated with accelerated progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Reducing the atherosclerotic vascular disease burden associated with demanding, low-income work may require interventions that do more than target low-income workers for behavioral modification.21 Although the intent of these programs is to improve behavioral risk factor profiles, they largely ignore the fact that demanding, low-paying work is only one, albeit important, aspect of life for individuals of low social class. In this light, employment in low-paying, high-demand jobs may well be an important link in a chain of causation between lack of education and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. If poor job conditions are just one of many deleterious exposures for people who receive little education, then we need to understand the relationship between job demands and health in a broad framework of interacting economic conditions, social circumstances, and behaviors that cascade over the life course31 32 33 and ultimately result in social class inequalities in morbidity and mortality.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 7, 1996; revision received January 21, 1997; accepted January 23, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Engels F; Henderson OW, Chalones WH, trans. The Condition of the Working Class in England. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press; 1958:108-116.
3.
Johnson JV, Stewart W, Hall EM, Fredlund P, Theorell
T. Long-term psychosocial work environment and
cardiovascular mortality among Swedish men.
Am J Public Health. 1996;86:324-331.
4. Schnall PL, Landsbergis PA. Job strain and cardiovascular disease. Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:381-411.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Hlatky MA, Lam LC, Lee KL, Clapp-Channing NE, Williams
RB, Pryor DB, Califf RM, Mark DB. Job strain and the prevalence
and outcome of coronary artery disease.
Circulation. 1995;92:327-333.
6. Crouse JR, Thompson CJ. An evaluation of methods for imaging and quantifying coronary and carotid lumen stenosis and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1993;87(suppl II):II-17-II-33.
7. Salonen JT, Salonen R. Ultrasound B-mode imaging in observational studies of atherosclerotic progression. Circulation. 1993;87,(suppl II):II-56-II-65.
8. Salonen JT, Korpela H, Salonen R, Nyyssönen K. Precision and reproducibility of ultrasonographic measurement of progression of common carotid artery atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1993;341:1158-1159.
9.
Persson J, Formgren J, Israelsson B, Berglund
G. Ultrasound-determined intima- media thickness and
atherosclerosis. Arterioscler
Thromb. 1994;14:261-264.
10. Grobbee DE, Hoes Aw, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Bots ML. Carotid intima-media thickness predicts myocardial infarction and stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 1996;93:630. Abstract.
11.
Craven TE, Ryu JE, Espeland MA, Kahl FR, McKinney WM,
Toole JF, McMahan MR, Thompson CJ, Heis G, Crouse JR. Evaluation
of the associations between carotid artery
atherosclerosis and coronary artery
stenosis. Circulation. 1990;82:1230-1242.
12. Salonen R, Salonen JT. Intima-media changes in a population study: KIHD. In: Boccalon H, ed. Vascular Medicine. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1993;301-304.
13. Bots ML, Hofman A, DE Jong PT, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness as an indicator of atherosclerosis at other sites of the carotid artery: the Rotterdam Study. Ann Epidemiol. 1996;6:147-153.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Salonen R, Cohen RD, Salonen
JT. Socioeconomic status and carotid
atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1995;92:1786-1792.
15.
Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Salonen R, Cohen RD, Salonen
JT. Socioeconomic status and progression of carotid
atherosclerosis: prospective evidence from the Kuopio
Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:513-519.
16. Salonen JT. Is there a continuing need for longitudinal epidemiologic research? The Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. Ann Clin Res. 1988;20:46-50.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Lakka TA, Salonen JT. Physical activity and
serum lipids: A cross-sectional population study in eastern Finnish
men. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136:806-818.
18.
Salonen R, Nyyssönen K, Porkkala E, Rummukainen
J, Belder R, Park J-S, Salonen JT. Kuopio
Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (KAPS).
Circulation. 1995;92:1758-1764.
19. Selzer RS, Hodis HN, Kwong-Fu H, Mack WJ, Lee PL, Choa-ran L, Ci-hau L. Evaluation of computerized edge tracking for quantifying intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery from B-mode ultrasound images. Atherosclerosis. 1994;111:1-11.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Wickstrand J, Wendelhag L. Methodological considerations of ultrasound investigation of intima-media thickness and lumen diameter. J Int Med. 1994;236:555-559.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Lynch JW, Krause N, Kaplan GA, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT. Workplace conditions, socioeconomic status, and the risk of mortality and acute myocardial infarction: the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:619-624.
22.
Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Cohen RD, Tuomilehto J, Salonen
JT. Do cardiovascular risk factors explain the
relation between socioeconomic status, risk of all-cause mortality,
cardiovascular mortality and acute myocardial
infarction? Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:934-942.
23.
Salonen JT, Salonen R, Seppänen K, Rauramaa R,
Tuomilehto J. HDL, HDL2, and HDL3
cholesterol subfractions and the risk of acute myocardial
infarction: a prospective population study in eastern Finnish
men. Circulation. 1991;84:129-139.
24. Ihanainen M, Salonen R, Seppänen K, Salonen JT. Nutrition data collection in the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study: nutrient intake of middle-aged Finnish men. Nutr Res. 1989;9:597-604.
25. Rose GA, Blackburn H, Gillum RF, Prineas RJ. Cardiovascular Survey Methods. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1982.
26. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1990.
27.
Aickin M, Gensler H. Adjusting for multiple
testing when reporting research results: the Bonferroni vs Holm
methods. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:726-728.
28. Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high effort/low reward conditions. J Occup Health Psych. 1996;1:27-41.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Karasek R, Baker D, Marxer F, Ahlbom A, Theorell
T. Job decision latitude, job demands, and
cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish
men. Am J Public Health. 1981;71:694-705.
30. Hansen EJ, Ringen S, Uusitalo H, Erikson R, eds. Welfare Trends in the Scandinavian Countries. New York, NY: ME Sharpe; 1993.
31. Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Salonen JT. Why do poor people behave poorly? Variations in adult health behaviors and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic life course. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:809-820.
32. Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Cohen RD, Kauhanen J, Wilson TW, Smith NL. Childhood and adult socioeconomic status as predictors of mortality in Finland. Lancet. 1994;343:524-527.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Kaplan GA. Where do shared pathways lead? Some
reflections on a research agenda. Psychosom Med. 1995;57:208-212.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Kaikkonen, O. Rahkonen, T. Lallukka, and E. Lahelma Physical and psychosocial working conditions as explanations for occupational class inequalities in self-rated health Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2009; 19(5): 458 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chaix, M. Rosvall, and J. Merlo Assessment of the magnitude of geographical variations and socioeconomic contextual effects on ischaemic heart disease mortality: a multilevel survival analysis of a large Swedish cohort J Epidemiol Community Health, April 1, 2007; 61(4): 349 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Crouse III Thematic review series: Patient-Oriented Research. Imaging atherosclerosis: state of the art J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1677 - 1699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Tuchsen, H Hannerz, C Roepstorff, and N Krause Stroke among male professional drivers in Denmark, 1994-2003 Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2006; 63(7): 456 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Rahkonen, M. Laaksonen, P. Martikainen, E. Roos, and E. Lahelma Job control, job demands, or social class? The impact of working conditions on the relation between social class and health J Epidemiol Community Health, January 1, 2006; 60(1): 50 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hintsanen, M. Kivimaki, M. Elovainio, L. Pulkki-Raback, P. Keskivaara, M. Juonala, O. T. Raitakari, and L. Keltikangas-Jarvinen Job Strain and Early Atherosclerosis: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study Psychosom Med, September 1, 2005; 67(5): 740 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rozanski, J. A. Blumenthal, K. W. Davidson, P. G. Saab, and L. Kubzansky The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice: The emerging field of behavioral cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2005; 45(5): 637 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Andersen, M. Osler, L. Petersen, M. Gronbaek, and E. Prescott Income and risk of ischaemic heart disease in men and women in a Nordic welfare country Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2003; 32(3): 367 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Rosvall, P-O Ostergren, B Hedblad, S-O Isacsson, L Janzon, and G Berglund Work-related psychosocial factors and carotid atherosclerosis Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2002; 31(6): 1169 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Crouse III, R. Tang, M. A. Espeland, J. G. Terry, T. Morgan, and M. Mercuri Associations of Extracranial Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression With Coronary Status and Risk Factors in Patients With and Without Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, October 15, 2002; 106(16): 2061 - 2066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Whiteman, I. J. Deary, and F. G. R. Fowkes Personality and Social Predictors of Atherosclerotic Progression: Edinburgh Artery Study Psychosom Med, September 1, 2000; 62(5): 703 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rosvall, P. O. Ostergren, B. Hedblad, S-O. Isacsson, L. Janzon, and G. Berglund Occupational Status, Educational Level, and the Prevalence of Carotid Atherosclerosis in a General Population Sample of Middle-aged Swedish Men and Women: Results from the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2000; 152(4): 334 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hemingway, M. Shipley, P. Macfarlane, and M. Marmot Impact of socioeconomic status on coronary mortality in people with symptoms, electrocardiographic abnormalities, both or neither: the original Whitehall study 25 year follow up J Epidemiol Community Health, July 1, 2000; 54(7): 510 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. M. Vrijkotte, L. J. P. van Doornen, and E. J. C. de Geus Effects of Work Stress on Ambulatory Blood Pressure, Heart Rate, and Heart Rate Variability Hypertension, April 1, 2000; 35(4): 880 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Castillo-Richmond, R. H. Schneider, C. N. Alexander, R. Cook, H. Myers, S. Nidich, C. Haney, M. Rainforth, and J. Salerno Effects of Stress Reduction on Carotid Atherosclerosis in Hypertensive African Americans Stroke, March 1, 2000; 31(3): 568 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Malek, S. L. Alper, and S. Izumo Hemodynamic Shear Stress and Its Role in Atherosclerosis JAMA, December 1, 1999; 282(21): 2035 - 2042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. M. Vrijkotte, L. J. P. van Doornen, and E. J. C. de Geus Work Stress and Metabolic and Hemostatic Risk Factors Psychosom Med, November 1, 1999; 61(6): 796 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rozanski, J. A. Blumenthal, and J. Kaplan Impact of Psychological Factors on the Pathogenesis of Cardiovascular Disease and Implications for Therapy Circulation, April 27, 1999; 99(16): 2192 - 2217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |