(Circulation. 1997;95:1827-1836.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Estimation of Central Aortic Pressure Waveform by Mathematical Transformation of Radial Tonometry Pressure
Validation of Generalized Transfer Function
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md.
Correspondence to David A. Kass, MD, Halsted 500, Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail dkass{at}welchlink.welch.jhu.edu
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
Background Central aortic pressures and waveform convey important information about cardiovascular status, but direct measurements are invasive. Peripheral pressures can be measured noninvasively, and although they often differ substantially from central pressures, they may be mathematically transformed to approximate the latter. We tested this approach, examining intersubject and intrasubject variability and the validity of using a single averaged transformation, which would enhance its applicability.
Methods and Results Invasive central aortic pressure by
micromanometer and radial pressure by automated tonometry were measured
in 20 patients at steady state and during hemodynamic transients
(Valsalva maneuver, abdominal compression, nitroglycerin, or vena caval
obstruction). For each patient, transfer functions (TFs) between aortic
and radial pressures were calculated by parametric model and results
averaged to yield individual TFs. A generalized TF was the average of
individual functions. TFs varied among patients, with coefficients of
variation for peak amplitude and frequency at peak amplitude of 24.9%
and 16.9%, respectively. Intrapatient TF variance with altered loading
(>20% variation in peak amplitude) was observed in 28.5% of
patients. Despite this, the generalized TF estimated central arterial
pressures to 
0.2±3.8 mm Hg error, arterial compliance to
6±7% accuracy, and augmentation index to within -7% points
(30±45% accuracy). Individual TFs were only marginally superior to
the generalized TF for reconstructing central pressures.
Conclusions Central aortic pressures can be accurately estimated from radial tonometry with the use of a generalized TF. The reconstructed waveform can provide arterial compliance estimates but may underestimate the augmentation index because the latter requires greater fidelity reproduction of the wave contour.
Key Words: blood pressure • diagnosis • aorta
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
Central aortic systolic and diastolic pressures are determinants of cardiac loading and perfusion, and they impact importantly on cardiovascular function. Knowledge of these pressures is often crucial to precise monitoring and titration of interventions in disease states. In addition to the pressures themselves, the arterial pressure waveform conveys useful information regarding systemic vascular stiffness,1 reflected waves,2 compliance, and other features of value in the bedside physical examination.3 Central arterial pressures can also be combined with measured aortic flows or left ventricular volumes to derive indexes of cardiac systolic function4 5 and ventricular-vascular interaction.6 7 8 However, widespread application of such analysis has been hindered by the requirement for invasive pressure measurements. An ability to accurately and noninvasively estimate aortic pressure waves would indeed be a valuable addition to current noninvasive tools such as those provided by echo/Doppler9 10 and magnetic resonance imaging.11
We previously validated a noninvasive technique to estimate central aortic systolic and diastolic pressures and the ascending portion of the pressure waveform.12 Coupled with radionuclide ventricular volumetry, this method was useful for assessing contractile function in heart failure patients13 and evaluating mechanisms of new drug therapies.14 However, this technique did not provide real-time, beat-to-beat pressures. Moreover, the reconstructed waveform was truncated after peak systolic pressure, so that the late systolic and the diastolic portions of the waveform were unavailable. Another noninvasive technique is applanation tonometry, which uses an externally applied micromanometer-tipped probe to continuously record peripheral pulse waveforms.15 16 Accurate recording with this method requires that the vessel wall be flattened by the probe so that transmural forces are perpendicular to the arterial surface.17 We and others have shown that reasonable estimates of central aortic pressure waveforms can be obtained by tonometry from the carotid artery.18 This technique is suboptimal, however, because the artery is surrounded by loose tissue, making it difficult to ascertain and consistently achieve optimal applanation.
In contrast to the carotid artery, the radial artery is very accessible and well supported by bony tissue, making optimal applanation far easier to achieve. The main disadvantage of using the radial pulse is that the pressure contour changes appreciably as it travels from the aorta to more peripheral sites, so that radial pressures cannot be used directly as a surrogate for central aortic pressure.19 However, it may be possible to estimate the central aortic pressure wave from radial tonometry data with the use of a mathematical transformation. Karamanoglu et al20 recently proposed such an approach using a single group-averaged TF to reconstruct aortic pressures. However, that study did not systematically assess interpatient and intrapatient variability of the TF, nor did it critically test potential influences of such variance on estimated parameters from the reconstructed waveforms. Because age and disease can dramatically affect vascular properties, it is unclear if a generalized approach can be used or if individualized transformation tailored to age, sex, and disease state is needed for accurate resynthesis.
Therefore, the principal goals of the present study were to determine the magnitude of interpatient and intrapatient variation of the TF between central and radial pressure waves under baseline conditions and during physiological maneuvers that substantially altered blood pressure. We further tested whether an averaged (generalized) transformation was sufficient to accurately estimate central pressures despite such variability. Radial pressures were measured by an automated tonometry21 device and were compared with micromanometer pressures measured in the central aorta.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
Study Subjects
Twenty patients referred for diagnostic cardiac catheterization at Johns Hopkins Hospital were enrolled for this study. Informed consent in a form approved by the institutional review board was obtained in all subjects. There were 16 men and 4 women with a mean age of 59 years (range, 36 to 78 years). Table 1
provides a
summary of clinical characteristics, cardiovascular diagnosis, ejection
fraction, and aortic and radial blood pressures at baseline and after
maximal load reduction.
|
Central Aortic and Radial Artery Pressure Recording
After completion of routine catheterization, a micromanometer
(SPC-320, Millar Instruments) was advanced inside the lumen of a
pigtail catheter placed in the ascending aorta. In some patients,
aortic pressure was recorded by a micromanometer mounted on a
multielectrode pressure-volume catheter (SSD-768, Millar
Instruments).
Radial pressure waves were recorded with the use of an improved automated tonometry device (Jentow, Colin Medical Inst Corp). Previous studies had used hand-held tonometers.20 Although this was probably adequate for brief steady-state data, manual recording was too unstable for accurate pressure tracking during hemodynamic transients, and it introduced an element of user dependence and thus potential bias to the data. The automated system circumvented these limitations. It used a wristwatchlike sensor with an array of 30 piezoresistive pressure transducers and included a servo-feedback mechanical system to optimize sensor position over the radial artery, determine the subset of microsensors from which to derive the pulse tracing, and adjust applanation hold-down pressure to maximize the recorded pulse pressure.21 The sensor was attached to a splint to keep the wrist hyperextended and immobilized. During the study, the tonometer was calibrated to manually triggered oscillometric arm-cuff pressures.
Data Acquisition
Pressure recordings were digitized at 200 Hz and stored for
off-line analysis. During the study, the automatic cuff-inflation
feature of the tonometer device was disabled. This was critical to
assess hemodynamic transient responses. Two-minute steady-state data
recordings were made in each subject. Data were then recorded during
one or more of several hemodynamic transient maneuvers: Valsalva
maneuver, manual compression of the upper abdomen, intravenous bolus of
200 µg nitroglycerin, or balloon obstruction of inferior vena caval
inflow. Subjects were advised to keep the instrumented wrist and arm
still during data acquisition.
Data Analysis
Calibration of Radial Tonometry
Although the radial tonometry signal was already calibrated to
an oscillometric cuff systolic and diastolic pressure (a component of
the Jentow device), there was still some uncertainty regarding the
accuracy of this calibration. Because our main goal was to test the
reliability of reverse transformation from radial to aortic waveforms,
we first minimized such potential calibration errors by matching mean
and diastolic pressures of the radial pulse signal to those measured by
aortic micromanometer for steady-state data.22 In a
separate analysis, we then tested the sensitivity of the resynthesized
aortic pressures to calibration errors in the radial signal.
Selection of Data During Hemodynamic Transients
Optimal applanation was occasionally lost during maneuvers such
as Valsalva or abdominal compression, generally due to subconscious
movement or stiffening of the instrumented wrist. Therefore, several
sets of data recorded during these maneuvers were unreliable. Loss of
adequate applanation was suspected in 6 of the 20 patients on the basis
of a sudden marked loss of correlation between the two pressure
recordings during the transient. These data tracings were not used for
subsequent analysis.
Estimation of TF
TFs between aortic pressure and radial pressure signals were
derived in each patient by the linear ARX model (see "Appendix").
This methodology yields more statistically stable and thus reliable
spectral estimates from limited data compared with nonparametric
(Fourier transform) approaches.23 Mean individual patient
TFs and their variances were evaluated by three to five TFs estimated
from separate steady-state data sequences (ITFss). Typical
sequences reflected four to eight sequential beats with a total of 1000
to 2000 data points. A TF GTFss was obtained by averaging
the ITFss from all 20 patients. For each of the 14 subjects
with stable hemodynamic transient data, an ITFtr was
determined by averaging functions derived from data reflecting the wide
range of hemodynamic conditions measured during the transient. The
ITFtr results were also group averaged, yielding a
GTFtr.
TFs were calculated in the physiological (forward) direction, ie, transforming aortic pressure to radial pressure as occurs with blood flow from central to peripheral vasculature. To reconstruct the aortic waveform from radial tonometry, the individual and generalized inverse TFs (ITFss-1, ITFtr-1, and GTFss-1) were calculated (see "Appendix").
Evaluation of Reconstructed Aortic Pressure Waves at Steady
State
For each subject, two reconstructed steady-state aortic pressure
waves were derived by applying the
GTFss-1 and
ITFss-1 to steady-state data.
Aortic, radial, and the two estimated aortic pressure waves were then
signal averaged to generate four pressure waveforms for each cardiac
cycle. Systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressures; total arterial
compliance; and AI24 were calculated from each ensemble of
pressure waves and compared. Waveforms were phase aligned, and
point-by-point differences and regressions were used to compare waves.
Overall agreement between the radial, reconstructed aortic, and
invasive aortic pressures were quantified by the sum of squares of
these differences normalized to the number of data points.
An error-sensitivity test was applied to evaluate the impact of the radial pressure calibration inaccuracies on estimated central pressures. Because the most common inaccuracy is in the diastolic pressure measurement, radial pressures were modified so that the input diastolic blood pressures were increased or decreased by 15 mm Hg in steps of 5 mm Hg, with systolic pressure kept constant. The GTFss-1 was then applied to this altered radial data, and the influence of calibration error on estimated aortic systolic pressure was determined.
Evaluation of Reconstructed Aortic Pressure Waves During
Hemodynamic Transients
We reconstructed three sets of aortic pressure waves from radial
pressure waveforms using (1) the
GTFss-1, (2) respective
ITFss-1, and (3) respective
ITFtr-1. Beat-to-beat systolic,
diastolic, and pulse pressures from aortic, radial, and the three
aortic pressure estimates were determined for each transient sequence.
Comparisons were examined by linear regression analysis, with measured
central aortic pressures as the dependent variable. In addition, the
maximal absolute pressure differences between estimated and measured
aortic data during the transient were determined. Thus, we tested the
extent to which the transformed radial pressure data could accurately
predict the extent of central aortic pressure change induced by the
various interventions.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SD. Comparisons between measured and
estimated parameters were performed by ANOVA. Significance was accepted
at a value of P.05.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
Aortic-Radial Pressure Differences and TF Analysis
Fig 1A
shows typical features of central aortic and
radial tonometry pressure waveforms. The radial waveform at steady
state has a more rapid upstroke and rapid decline from peak, enhanced
secondary oscillations at the dicrotic notch, and higher peak systolic
and pulse pressures. Resting radial systolic pressures exceeded aortic
pressure by 10.3±9.4 mm Hg (P=.001), or 8% on
average. At maximal pressure reduction (mean 40-mm Hg decline in
systolic pressure) during hemodynamic transients, this disparity rose
to 17±10 mm Hg, or 16%.
|
Fig 1B
displays the two GTFs describing the transformation from aortic
to radial pressure waveforms. The GTFss (n=20) and
GTFtr (n=14) were very similar. The peak amplitude of the
GTFs occurred between 4 to 5 Hz (4.38±0.74 and 4.35±0.66 Hz),
reaching an amplitude of 
2.5x the value at zero frequency
(2.66±0.66 and 2.54±0.42). However, as indicated by the 95% CIs,
there was considerable interpatient variability. The steady-state
interpatient coefficient of variation (SDx100/mean) was 25.3% for
peak amplitude and 16.9% for the frequency of peak amplitude.
Steady-state intrapatient variability was less, with a mean of 6.0%
for the peak amplitude (range, 0.9% to 21.0%) and 2.9% for frequency
of peak amplitude (range, 0.0% to 10.4%). However, this variability
was greater (14.8% and 9.8%, respectively) during hemodynamic
transients, with 28.5% of patients displaying >20% change in the
peak TF amplitude.
Because the GTFss and GTFtr were similar, only
the GTFss-1 was used for waveform
resynthesis analysis. The steady-state TF previously reported by
Karamanoglu et al20 is also shown in Fig 1B and was
similar to those derived for the present study but with slightly
greater variance and amplitude.
Reconstruction of Aortic Pressure Waveform at Steady State
Fig 2 displays examples of pressure tracings for
measured central aortic and radial tonometry pressures and estimated
aortic pressures from transformed radial data using the
GTFss-1 and
ITFss-1. Use of the
GTFss-1 yielded a waveform with
pulse amplitude and contour similar to the centrally measured wave.
Application of the ITFss-1 yielded
very similar results, with somewhat better fidelity for reproducing
high-frequency fluctuations such as the systolic inflection. Fig 2 also
displays regressions of radial or transformed (estimated) aortic
pressure waveforms versus measured central aortic pressure. There was
slightly greater accuracy in waveform estimation (indexed by minimal
area of the plot) with the
ITFss-1.
|
, Systolic
inflection points resulting from arterial wave reflection (used to
calculate the AI). 
, Timing of the incisura. Corresponding plots
of each respective pressure wave (y axis) versus aortic
pressure (x axis) are shown below (D-F).
Table 2 lists group hemodynamic data derived from
central aortic pressures and compares them to values measured from the
raw radial pressure tracings and to values estimated after
GTFss-1 or
ITFss-1 transformation of the
radial pressures.
GTFss-1-estimated central arterial
pressures differed from measured values by 0.2±3.8 mm Hg.
ITFss-1 transformation reduced
this variance to 0.9 mm Hg. Normalized sum-of-squares differences
between aortic and radial pressure waves averaged 209±201
mm Hg2 during the cardiac cycle. Corresponding values for
the reconstructed aortic pressure wave derived by the
GTFss-1 or
ITFss-1 were 7±6 and 2±2
mm Hg2, respectively. Thus,
GTFss-1 yielded a 96% improvement
in the fit between measured and estimated central aortic pressure
waveform (P<.001), and the ITFss-1
improved the fit by an additional 3% (P<.001).
Error-sensitivity analysis revealed that a 10-mm Hg error in radial
diastolic pressure calibration yielded only a 3-mm Hg mean deviation
in aortic systolic pressure. This result was similar with both
GTFss-1 and
ITFss-1 analysis.
|
Total vascular compliance based on radial pressures was overestimated by 26.4%; this was markedly improved to only a 6.2% error when the GTFss-1 transformation was used. Application of the ITFss-1 to the same radial pressure data did not improve this mean result.
The central arterial AI calculated from reconstructed waveforms was significantly lower than that calculated directly from the aortic pressure wave (both P<.05). On average, the mean AI by GTFss-1 analysis was 30±45% lower. The variance in this underestimation was reduced when the ITFss-1 was used.
Hemodynamic Transient Analysis
Fig 3 displays examples of pressure data measured
before and during transient reductions in arterial pressure induced by
inferior vena caval occlusion. Although radial pressure generally
tracked aortic pressure during the transient, there was an increasing
disparity between the two signals at the nadir of the response with
respect to both amplitude and waveform. This is highlighted in the
lower tracings in Fig 3. Regression analysis of raw radial versus
aortic pressures during such transients (Table 3)
revealed that the diastolic pressure had the strongest correlation. The
maximal disparity between radial and aortic systolic (and pulse)
pressures averaged 25±8 mm Hg and was not always observed at the
pressure nadir (cf Table 1). Thus, an intervention that appeared to
reduce arterial systolic pressures by 15 mm Hg, as measured at
the radial artery, might have actually lowered central aortic pressure
by as much as 40 mm Hg.
|
|
Fig 4 displays the same patient data with radial
pressures transformed by GTFss-1
(Fig 4A) or ITFss-1 (Fig 4B).
There was marked improvement in concordance of the amplitude at rest
and throughout the entire pressure transient with
GTFss-1. Slightly better concordance was
achieved with ITFss-1 analysis, particularly
with respect to the precise waveform shape.
|
Examples of regressions of systolic, diastolic, or pulse pressure for
radial and transformed radial pressures against measured aortic
pressure during hemodynamic transients are shown in Fig 5. Application of the GTFss-1
shifted the regressions toward the line of identity, and a slight
further improvement was observed if the
ITFss-1 was used. There was no further benefit
from ITF-1 derived from beats at varying loads
(ITFtr-1). Group data in Table 3 support these
examples.
|
The accuracy of GTFss-1 or
ITFss-1 resynthesis of central
aortic pressure waveforms during a transient loading change depended on
the constancy of TF. Although the TF was constant on average, several
patients displayed marked changes in TF with load reduction. Fig 6 shows an example of this response. ITFs were
calculated from cycles selected during the fall in arterial load. In
the patient whose data are shown in Fig 6A, these ITFs were little
altered, whereas in the patient whose data are shown in Fig 6B, there
was a marked change in ITF during the transient. No single constant TF
could therefore accurately reconstruct pressure waveforms during
transients in such a patient. It should be noted that this degree of
intrapatient variability of TF (coefficient of variation for peak
amplitude >20%) was less common, occurring in 4 of 14 subjects.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
This study demonstrates that clinically acceptable predictions of central arterial pressure and the pressure waveform can be obtained by mathematical manipulation of radial pressure waves by use of a GTFss-1. These results extend earlier data20 by showing, rather surprisingly, that this method works despite marked changes in pressure induced by hemodynamic transients and that equally surprisingly, only relatively small additional improvement in the prediction is achieved if an ITF-1 is used for each patient. Application of this approach to radial pressure data should improve titration of vasodilators and other medications, as it is well recognized that radial pressures can underestimate the hemodynamic benefit of such drugs.25
The amplitude and phase configuration of the TF relating aortic to radial pressures were generally similar among patients as well as within patients during hemodynamic transients. This finding provides insight into the likely sources for TF variability. The marked changes in radial and central aortic pressure waveforms when mean pressure was lowered reflect the pressure dependence not only of vascular compliance but also of the timing and magnitude of reflected waves. When pulse wave velocity is low, reflected waves return to the aortic region after end ejection, with minimal effects on aortic systolic pressure. When velocity is high, the reflected waves return sooner, augmenting systolic pressure.2 The dependence of pulse wave velocity, arterial compliance, and reflected waves on mean blood pressure varies with age and vascular disease.26 27 28 All of these considerations might lead one to suspect that a generalized TF approach should not work. Yet the opposite was demonstrated in most patients, suggesting that anatomic factors dominate over physiological conditions in determining the TF.
The finding that the GTFss-1 works nearly as well as an ITF-1 suggests that differences in body morphology, age, and sex are not as strong determinants of the TF as the pressure amplification due to vascular branching in the upper extremity that occurs in everyone.29 Indeed, our TF data are in close agreement with previously reported results (peak at 4 Hz with amplification of 2.8).20 Vascular properties in the upper limb are less affected by aging, arterial pressure, or various maneuvers compared with vessels in the trunk and lower limbs,26 27 28 30 and therefore this observation might not hold true for TFs between femoral and aortic pressures.
The present study also showed that in a small percentage of
individuals, the TF deviated from this generalized form and that it
could also vary as a function of mean blood pressure or other
physiological conditions (eg, Fig 6). In such patients, any constant
TF, whether calculated as a generalized or individualized function,
would yield less reliable predictions. It is possible that part of this
disparity stemmed from subtle inaccuracies in applanation during the
hemodynamic transients. However, as correlation coefficients between
tonometric radial and central aortic systolic or diastolic pressures
remained >0.9, this is less likely. Direct radial pressure recordings
will be needed to further explore this question.
Although peak and trough pressures were well predicted by the GTFss-1, the exact shape of the central aortic pressure waveform was less well reproduced. It was improved upon by the ITFss-1, but this requires invasive measurements of aortic pressures. Conceivably, individualization of the TF might be achieved by analysis of simultaneous carotid and radial tonometry signals, but this could introduce additional errors and artifacts. For indexes less dependent on the precise waveform contour, such as total arterial compliance, which was estimated by a method using the area under the diastolic portion of the decay curve,1 the GTFss-1 provided reasonable estimates.
For parameters such as AI, which are more dependent on the
high-frequency content (
8 harmonics; see Fig 7) of the
pressure wave, this limitation can be problematic. Calculation of AI
was in part compromised by the need to low-pass filter the
GTF-1, which was required to reduce noise in
the reconstructed waveform. The filter cutoff was set by the structure
of the ITF-1 to prevent amplification of
higher frequencies (within the range of 9 to 12 Hz; see
"Appendix"). AI was very dependent on the exact location of this
cutoff, contributing to the underestimation.
|
The TF can be estimated by several techniques. Commonly used Fourier transform approaches are often limited by high variance in the estimated TF and the need for long data sequences to reduce this variance by spectral-estimate averaging (see "Appendix").23 Such long data sequences can only be acquired during steady state. To overcome this limitation and enable TF estimation from short hemodynamic transients, a more efficient parametric estimation algorithm23 was used for the present study.
Our TF did not approach the value of 1 at 0 Hz as might be expected because the means of both central aortic and peripheral radial pressures were matched. However, we also matched the diastolic blood pressures of both signals, even though the real radial diastolic blood pressure is slightly lower.19 By forcing the two diastolic pressures to be the same, energy was artificially introduced into the radial pressure input so that the TF showed some deamplification in the low-frequency range. This calibration technique is practical and widely used; therefore, the resulting TF is appropriate. Furthermore, even when a correction was made to offset this low-frequency deamplification, the results were within 1 mm Hg of those presented.
The TF between ascending aortic micromanometer pressure and radial tonometric pressure in reality combines two functions: one between aortic pressure and the true radial pressure and the second between radial pressure and the tonometry signal. Because we did not invasively instrument the radial artery with a second micromanometer, the influence of this latter component in our population is unknown. Factors such as the thickness of the intervening subcutaneous tissue, positioning of the tonometric pressure sensor, change in the hold-down pressure during hemodynamic transients, or movement of the fingers and wrist could theoretically alter this TF and thus the radial pressure waveform. The TF between invasive radial pressure and the tonometry signal has been studied previously,21 however, and revealed a flat gain to 6 to 7 Hz, which covers the major portion of the frequency range of interest. Thus, we feel that this second function is not of major significance. Most importantly, we have shown that the reverse-TF approach enabled estimation of invasive aortic pressures from noninvasive data, which was the primary goal.
Because of well-recognized discrepancies between the central and peripheral arterial pressure waveforms,29 it is inadequate to monitor hemodynamic status or pharmacological responses from radial pressures. When a generalized TF is applied, the radial pressure recorded either invasively or noninvasively by a tonometric device can be used to reconstruct the central aortic pressure waveform with clinically acceptable accuracy for systolic and pulse pressures and to estimate vascular compliance. This approach should substantially reduce the uncertainties resulting from radial pressure monitoring for critical care, chronic hypertension therapy, and pharmacological trials.
|
Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
|
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by National Institute of Aging grant AG-12249 (Dr Kass), a fellowship grant from Colin Medical Instruments Corporation (B. Fetics), and a Fogarty Foundation Fellowship Award (Dr Nevo). The authors are grateful to Colin Medical Instruments Corp for loaning the tonometer used in these studies. Dr Chen is a Clinical Research Fellow from the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Veterans General Hospital–Taipei and National Yang-Ming University, Republic of China.
|
Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
ARX Parametric Model
The Model
The ARX linear model23 describes the properties of a system on the basis of its immediate past input and output data as
 |
 |
Model Order Selection
The model order for this study was set to be [10,10], ie, 10
"a" coefficients and 10 "b" coefficients were determined
for each TF estimate. The minimal model order was set to be [5,5] to
achieve a similar spectral estimate as given by nonparametric
methodology (Fourier transform) during steady state. The maximal model
order was set at [20,20] on the basis of calculating the Akaike
Information Criterion, which measures the estimation performance
against the model order.23 The actual model order
for the estimation process was selected by testing whether a higher
model order yielded a change in the spectral estimate that was larger
than the SD of the estimate. This approach was justified because
increasing the model order, although resulting in better fit of the
measured data, usually increases the variance of the
estimate.23 Determination of the smallest model
order with sufficient spectral resolution was essential to enable
reliable estimation based on short data sequences during hemodynamic
transients.
Comparison With Fourier Transform Estimation
Parametric models can be compared with nonparametric methods,
eg, TF estimation with the Fourier transform. When the same data set
was used, the parametric and nonparametric estimates produced similar
results, although the parametric methodology provided a smaller
variance of the estimate (Fig 8). The variance of the
Fourier-derived spectrum was similar to that of the ARX-derived
spectrum only when the larger data set was used.
Direct and Inverse TFs
Direct TFs that correspond to the physiological system were
estimated with the aortic pressure used as input and the radial
tonometer signal as output. To enable reconstruction of the aortic
pressure from the radial tonometer signal, an inverse TF was directly
derived from the direct TF (Equation 1) as follows:
 |
 |
and 8), the
inverse TF will have high gains at these frequencies, which amplify
high-frequency noise and distort the reconstructed aortic pressure
wave. This problem can be solved by convolving the inverse TF with a
low-pass filter having a cutoff frequency set at the frequency at which
the magnitude of the direct TF gain function declines below 1, except
for those cases that resulted in cutoff frequency <9 Hz, in which an
average value of 11 Hz was used. Received September 11, 1996; revision received November 12, 1996; accepted November 19, 1996.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix 1References |
|---|
1. Liu Z, Brin KP, Yin FCP. Estimation of total arterial compliance: an improved method and evaluation of current methods. Am J Physiol. 1986;251:H588-H600.
2.
O'Rourke MF, Yaginuma T. Wave reflections and
the arterial pulse. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:366-371.
3. O'Rourke MF. The arterial pulse in health and disease. Am Heart J. 1971;82:687-702. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Kass DA, Beyar R. Evaluation of contractile
state by maximal ventricular power divided by the square of
end-diastolic volume. Circulation. 1991;84:1698-1708.
5.
Kass DA, Maughan WL, Guo ZM, Kono A, Sunagawa K,
Sagawa K. Comparative influence of load versus inotropic states
on indexes of ventricular contractility: experimental and theoretical
analysis based on pressure-volume relationships.
Circulation. 1987;76:1422-1436.
6.
Kelly RP, Ting CT, Yang TM, Liu CP, Maughan WL, Chang
MS, Kass DA. Effective arterial elastance as index of arterial
vascular load in humans. Circulation. 1992;86:513-521.
7. Kameyama T, Asanoi H, Ishizaka S, Sasayama S. Ventricular load optimization by unloading therapy in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:199-207. [Abstract]
8.
de Tombe PP, Jones S, Hunter WC, Burkhoff D, Kass
DA. Ventricular stroke work and efficiency remain nearly optimal
despite broad changes in ventricular-vascular coupling.
Am J Physiol. 1993;264:H1817-H1824.
9. Gorcsan J III, Romand JA, Mandarino WA, Deneault LG, Pinsky MR. Assessment of left ventricular performance by on-line pressure-area relations using echocardiographic automated border detection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:242-252. [Abstract]
10. Kelly R, Fitchett D. Noninvasive determination of aortic input impedance and external left ventricular power output: a validation and repeatability study of a new technique. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:952-963. [Abstract]
11. Pattynama PM, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, Van Voorthuisen AE. Evaluation of cardiac function with magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J. 1994;128:595-607. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Sharir T, Marmor A, Ting CT, Chen JW, Liu CP, Chang MS,
Yin FCP, Kass DA. Validation of a method for noninvasive
measurement of central arterial pressure.
Hypertension. 1993;21:74-82.
13.
Sharir T, Feldman MD, Haber H, Feldman AM, Marmor A,
Becker LC, Kass DA. Ventricular systolic assessment in patients
with dilated cardiomyopathy by preload-adjusted maximal power:
validation and noninvasive application. Circulation. 1994;89:2045-2053.
14. Kass DA, Van Anden E, Becker LC, Kasper EK, White WB, Feldman AM. Dose dependence of chronic positive inotropic effect of vesnarinone in patients with congestive heart failure due to idiopathic or ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:652-656. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Kelly R, Karamanoglu M, Gibbs H, Avolio AP, O'Rourke MF. Noninvasive carotid pressure wave registration as an indicator of ascending aortic pressure. J Vasc Med Biol. 1989;1:241-247.
16. Kelly R, Hayward C, Ganis J, Daley J, Avolio A, O'Rourke M. Noninvasive registration of the arterial pressure pulse waveform using high-fidelity applanation tonometry. J Vasc Med Biol. 1989;1:142-149.
17. Drzewiecki GM, Melbin J, Noordergraaf A. Arterial tonometry: review and analysis. J Biomech. 1983;16:141-152. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Chen CH, Ting CT, Nussbacher A, Nevo E, Kass DA, Pak P,
Wang SP, Chang MS, Yin FCP. Validation of carotid artery
tonometry as a means of estimating augmentation index of ascending
aortic pressure. Hypertension. 1996;27:168-175.
19.
Pauca AL, Wallenhaupt SL, Kon ND, Tucker WY.
Does radial artery pressure accurately reflect aortic pressure?
Chest. 1992;102:1193-1198.
20.
Karamanoglu M, O'Rourke MF, Avolio AP, Kelly
RP. An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and
peripheral upper limb pressure waves in man. Eur
Heart J. 1993;14:160-167.
21.
Sato T, Nishinaga M, Kawamoto A, Ozawa T, Takatsuji
H. Accuracy of a continuous blood pressure monitor based on
arterial tonometry. Hypertension. 1993;21:866-874.
22.
Karamanoglu M, Gallagher DE, Avolio AP, O'Rourke
MF. Pressure wave propagation in a multibranched model of the
human upper limb. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H1363-H1369.
23. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory for the User. 1st ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1987.
24.
Takazawa K, Tanaka N, Takeda K, Kurosu F, Ibukiyama
C. Underestimation of vasodilator effects of nitroglycerin by
upper limb blood pressure. Hypertension. 1995;26:520-523.
25. Simkus GJ, Fitchett DH. Radial arterial pressure measurements may be a poor guide to the beneficial effects of nitroprusside on left ventricular systolic pressure in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:323-326. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Cox RH. Pressure dependence of the mechanical properties of arteries in vivo. Am J Physiol. 1975;229:1371-1375.
27.
Alexander J Jr, Burkhoff D, Schipke J, Sagawa K.
Influence of mean pressure on aortic impedance and reflections in the
systemic arterial system. Am J Physiol. 1989;257:H969-H978.
28.
Latson TW, Hunter WC, Katoh N, Sagawa K. Effect
of nitroglycerin on aortic impedance, diameter, and pulse-wave
velocity. Circ Res. 1988;62:884-890.
29. O'Rourke MF, Kelly R, Avolio A. The Arterial Pulse. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1992.
30. Boutouyrie P, Laurent S, Benetos A, Girerd XJ, Hoeks APG, Safar ME. Opposing effects of aging on distal and proximal large arteries in hypertensives. J Hypertens. 1992;10(suppl 6):S87-S91.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. S. Utescu, A. LeBoeuf, N. Chbinou, S. Desmeules, M. Lebel, and M. Agharazii The impact of arteriovenous fistulas on aortic stiffness in patients with chronic kidney disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 9, 2009; (2009) gfp276v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. P. L. Rice, N. Agarwal, H. Bolusani, R. Newcombe, M. F. Scanlon, M. Ludgate, and D. A. Rees Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone Replacement on Vascular Function in Primary and Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency: A Randomized Crossover Trial J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 1966 - 1972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Zocalo, D. Bia, W. Reyes-Caorsi, J. Gonzalez-Moreno, and R. L. Armentano Arterial load reduction after cardiac resynchronization therapy: why does it change? Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2009; 10(4): 461 - 462. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Lurbe, E. Carvajal, I. Torro, F. Aguilar, J. Alvarez, and J. Redon Influence of Concurrent Obesity and Low Birth Weight on Blood Pressure Phenotype in Youth Hypertension, June 1, 2009; 53(6): 912 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Yaron, Y. Greenman, J. B Rosenfeld, E. Izkhakov, R. Limor, E. Osher, G. Shenkerman, K. Tordjman, and N. Stern Effect of testosterone replacement therapy on arterial stiffness in older hypogonadal men Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2009; 160(5): 839 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Olafiranye, G. Qureshi, L. Salciccioli, K. Vernon-Jones, C. Philip, J. Kassotis, and J. M. Lazar The Relationship Between Effective Arterial Capacitance and Pulse Wave Velocity Is Dependent on Left Ventricular Stroke Volume Angiology, February 1, 2009; 60(1): 82 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. G. Kips, E. R. Rietzschel, M. L. De Buyzere, B. E. Westerhof, T. C. Gillebert, L. M. Van Bortel, and P. Segers Evaluation of Noninvasive Methods to Assess Wave Reflection and Pulse Transit Time From the Pressure Waveform Alone Hypertension, February 1, 2009; 53(2): 142 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. E. Westerhof, I. Guelen, W. J. Stok, H. A. J. Lasance, C. A. P. L. Ascoop, K. H. Wesseling, N. Westerhof, W. J. W. Bos, N. Stergiopulos, and J. A. E. Spaan Individualization of transfer function in estimation of central aortic pressure from the peripheral pulse is not required in patients at rest J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1858 - 1863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. S. Heffernan, S. Y. Jae, K. R. Wilund, J. A. Woods, and B. Fernhall Racial differences in central blood pressure and vascular function in young men Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): H2380 - H2387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. D. Smith and P. J. Levy Review: New techniques for assessment of vascular function Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2008; 2(5): 373 - 385. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-J. Thore, J. Stalhand, and M. Karlsson Toward a noninvasive subject-specific estimation of abdominal aortic pressure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): H1156 - H1164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Ishizawa, K. Yoshiuchi, Y. Takimoto, Y. Yamamoto, and A. Akabayashi Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Variability and Baroreflex Sensitivity in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa Psychosom Med, July 1, 2008; 70(6): 695 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. G. Edwards, M. S. Roy, and R. Y. Prasad Wave reflection augments central systolic and pulse pressures during facial cooling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): H2535 - H2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Avolio Central Aortic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Risk: A Paradigm Shift? Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1470 - 1471. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Karalliedde, A. Smith, L. DeAngelis, V. Mirenda, A. Kandra, J. Botha, P. Ferber, and G. Viberti Valsartan Improves Arterial Stiffness in Type 2 Diabetes Independently of Blood Pressure Lowering Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1617 - 1623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Aggoun, N. J. Farpour-Lambert, L. M. Marchand, E. Golay, A. B.R. Maggio, and M. Beghetti Impaired endothelial and smooth muscle functions and arterial stiffness appear before puberty in obese children and are associated with elevated ambulatory blood pressure Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2008; 29(6): 792 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. P Schneider, C. Delles, A. U Klingbeil, M. Ludwig, R. E Kolloch, M. Krekler, K. O Stumpe, and R. E Schmieder Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on central haemodynamics in essential hypertension: results of a randomised trial Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2008; 9(1): 49 - 56. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Shimizu and K. Kario Review: Role of the augmentation index in hypertension Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 25 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. G. Edwards, C. R. Mastin, and R. W. Kenefick Wave reflection and central aortic pressure are increased in response to static and dynamic muscle contraction at comparable workloads J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2008; 104(2): 439 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Ghiadoni, G. Penno, C. Giannarelli, Y. Plantinga, M. Bernardini, L. Pucci, R. Miccoli, S. Taddei, A. Salvetti, and S. Del Prato Metabolic Syndrome and Vascular Alterations in Normotensive Subjects at Risk of Diabetes Mellitus Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 440 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Qasem and A. Avolio Determination of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity From Waveform Decomposition of the Central Aortic Pressure Pulse Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 188 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. S. DeLoach and R. R. Townsend Vascular Stiffness: Its Measurement and Significance for Epidemiologic and Outcome Studies Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 184 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. J. Sommerfield, I. B. Wilkinson, D. J. Webb, and B. M. Frier Vessel wall stiffness in type 1 diabetes and the central hemodynamic effects of acute hypoglycemia Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1274 - E1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. P. Casey, D. T. Beck, and R. W. Braith Progressive Resistance Training Without Volume Increases Does Not Alter Arterial Stiffness and Aortic Wave Reflection Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2007; 232(9): 1228 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Curtis, A. Zambanini, J. Mayet, S. A. McG Thom, R. Foale, K. H. Parker, and A. D. Hughes Reduced systolic wave generation and increased peripheral wave reflection in chronic heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H557 - H562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Safar Mechanism(s) of Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction and Drug Therapy in Hypertension Hypertension, July 1, 2007; 50(1): 167 - 171. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors/Task Force Members:, G. Mancia, G. De Backer, A. Dominiczak, R. Cifkova, R. Fagard, G. Germano, G. Grassi, A. M. Heagerty, S. E. Kjeldsen, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J., June 11, 2007; (2007) ehm236v1. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-M. Tartiere, D. Logeart, F. Beauvais, C. Chavelas, L. Kesri, J.-Y. Tabet, and A. Cohen-solal Non-invasive radial pulse wave assessment for the evaluation of left ventricular systolic performance in heart failure Eur J Heart Fail, May 1, 2007; 9(5): 477 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Swamy, Q. Ling, T. Li, and R. Mukkamala Blind identification of the aortic pressure waveform from multiple peripheral artery pressure waveforms Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2257 - H2264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. J. Kullo and A. R. Malik Arterial Ultrasonography and Tonometry as Adjuncts to Cardiovascular Risk Stratification J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2007; 49(13): 1413 - 1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Lee, C. Shirodaria, C. E Jackson, M. D Robson, C. Antoniades, J. M Francis, F. Wiesmann, K. M Channon, S. Neubauer, and R. P Choudhury Multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging quantifies atherosclerosis and vascular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, March 1, 2007; 4(1): 44 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Zineh, A. L. Beitelshees, and M. J. Haller NOS3 Polymorphisms Are Associated With Arterial Stiffness in Children With Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes Care, March 1, 2007; 30(3): 689 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. E. Donald, M. Charakida, T. J. Cole, P. Friberg, P. J. Chowienczyk, S. C. Millasseau, J. E. Deanfield, and J. P. Halcox Non-Invasive Assessment of Endothelial Function: Which Technique? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 7, 2006; 48(9): 1846 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Laurent, J. Cockcroft, L. Van Bortel, P. Boutouyrie, C. Giannattasio, D. Hayoz, B. Pannier, C. Vlachopoulos, I. Wilkinson, H. Struijker-Boudier, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2006; 27(21): 2588 - 2605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. Stok, B. E. Westerhof, and J. M. Karemaker Changes in finger-aorta pressure transfer function during and after exercise J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2006; 101(4): 1207 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. E. Westerhof, I. Guelen, N. Westerhof, J. M. Karemaker, and A. Avolio Quantification of Wave Reflection in the Human Aorta From Pressure Alone: A Proof of Principle Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 595 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Schillaci, M. Pirro, M. R. Mannarino, G. Pucci, G. Savarese, S. S. Franklin, and E. Mannarino Relation Between Renal Function Within the Normal Range and Central and Peripheral Arterial Stiffness in Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 616 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. W. Nichols, J. C. Estrada, R. W. Braith, K. Owens, and C. R. Conti Enhanced External Counterpulsation Treatment Improves Arterial Wall Properties and Wave Reflection Characteristics in Patients With Refractory Angina J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 19, 2006; 48(6): 1208 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. F. O'Rourke and J. B. Seward Central Arterial Pressure and Arterial Pressure Pulse: New Views Entering the Second Century After Korotkov Mayo Clin. Proc., August 1, 2006; 81(8): 1057 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Vlachopoulos, N. Alexopoulos, I. Dima, K. Aznaouridis, I. Andreadou, and C. Stefanadis Acute Effect of Black and Green Tea on Aortic Stiffness and Wave Reflections J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2006; 25(3): 216 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. D. Owen, C. Rajiv, D. Vinereanu, T. Mathew, A. G. Fraser, and J. H. Lazarus Subclinical Hypothyroidism, Arterial Stiffness, and Myocardial Reserve J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2126 - 2132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. Sharman, R. Lim, A. M. Qasem, J. S. Coombes, M. I. Burgess, J. Franco, P. Garrahy, I. B. Wilkinson, and T. H. Marwick Validation of a Generalized Transfer Function to Noninvasively Derive Central Blood Pressure During Exercise Hypertension, June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1203 - 1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. G. Edwards, A. L. Gauthier, M. A. Hayman, J. T. Lang, and R. W. Kenefick Acute effects of cold exposure on central aortic wave reflection J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2006; 100(4): 1210 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 The CAFE Investigators, for the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial, CAFE Steering Committee and Writing Committee, B. Williams, P. S. Lacy, S. M. Thom, K. Cruickshank, A. Stanton, D. Collier, A. D. Hughes, et al. Differential Impact of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs on Central Aortic Pressure and Clinical Outcomes: Principal Results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) Study Circulation, March 7, 2006; 113(9): 1213 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Eldrup, H. Sillesen, E. Prescott, and B. G. Nordestgaard Ankle brachial index, C-reactive protein, and central augmentation index to identify individuals with severe atherosclerosis Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2006; 27(3): 316 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. P. Schulman, L. C. Becker, D. A. Kass, H. C. Champion, M. L. Terrin, S. Forman, K. V. Ernst, M. D. Kelemen, S. N. Townsend, A. Capriotti, et al. L-Arginine Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Vascular Interaction With Age in Myocardial Infarction (VINTAGE MI) Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, January 4, 2006; 295(1): 58 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B A Haluska, K Matthys, R Fathi, E Rozis, S G Carlier, and T H Marwick Influence of arterial compliance on presence and extent of ischaemia during stress echocardiography Heart, January 1, 2006; 92(1): 40 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P M Mottram, B A Haluska, R Leano, S Carlier, C Case, and T H Marwick Relation of arterial stiffness to diastolic dysfunction in hypertensive heart disease Heart, December 1, 2005; 91(12): 1551 - 1556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Hope, D. B. Tay, I. T. Meredith, and J. D. Cameron Waveform dispersion, not reflection, may be the major determinant of aortic pressure wave morphology Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): H2497 - H2502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Schillaci, G. V.L. De Socio, M. Pirro, G. Savarese, M. R. Mannarino, F. Baldelli, G. Stagni, and E. Mannarino Impact of Treatment With Protease Inhibitors on Aortic Stiffness in Adult Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2005; 25(11): 2381 - 2385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Vlachopoulos, I. Dima, K. Aznaouridis, C. Vasiliadou, N. Ioakeimidis, C. Aggeli, M. Toutouza, and C. Stefanadis Acute Systemic Inflammation Increases Arterial Stiffness and Decreases Wave Reflections in Healthy Individuals Circulation, October 4, 2005; 112(14): 2193 - 2200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Verbeke, P. Segers, S. Heireman, R. Vanholder, P. Verdonck, and L. M. Van Bortel Noninvasive Assessment of Local Pulse Pressure: Importance of Brachial-to-Radial Pressure Amplification Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 244 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Ruiz, D. Monbaron, G. Parati, S. Perret, E. Haesler, C. Danzeisen, and D. Hayoz Diabetic Neuropathy Is a More Important Determinant of Baroreflex Sensitivity Than Carotid Elasticity in Type 2 Diabetes Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 162 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Vlachopoulos, D. Panagiotakos, N. Ioakeimidis, I. Dima, and C. Stefanadis Chronic coffee consumption has a detrimental effect on aortic stiffness and wave reflections Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2005; 81(6): 1307 - 1312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. S. Reneman, J. M. Meinders, and A. P.G. Hoeks Non-invasive ultrasound in arterial wall dynamics in humans: what have we learned and what remains to be solved Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2005; 26(10): 960 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. F. O'Rourke and W. W. Nichols Aortic Diameter, Aortic Stiffness, and Wave Reflection Increase With Age and Isolated Systolic Hypertension Hypertension, April 1, 2005; 45(4): 652 - 658. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Haller, M. Samyn, W. W. Nichols, T. Brusko, C. Wasserfall, R. F. Schwartz, M. Atkinson, J. J. Shuster, G. L. Pierce, and J. H. Silverstein Radial Artery Tonometry Demonstrates Arterial Stiffness in Children With Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes Care, December 1, 2004; 27(12): 2911 - 2917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Lemogoum, L. Van Bortel, B. Najem, A. Dzudie, C. Teutcha, E. Madu, M. Leeman, J.-P. Degaute, and P. van de Borne Arterial Stiffness and Wave Reflections in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease Hypertension, December 1, 2004; 44(6): 924 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Vlachopoulos, F. Kosmopoulou, D. Panagiotakos, N. Ioakeimidis, N. Alexopoulos, C. Pitsavos, and C. Stefanadis Smoking and caffeine have a synergistic detrimental effect on aortic stiffness and wave reflections J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1911 - 1917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Mustata, C. Chan, V. Lai, and J. A. Miller Impact of an Exercise Program on Arterial Stiffness and Insulin Resistance in Hemodialysis Patients J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2004; 15(10): 2713 - 2718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P. Avolio, J. R. Cockcroft, and M. F. O'Rourke Use of Arterial Transfer Functions for the Derivation of Central Aortic Waveform Characteristics in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Response to Hope et al. Diabetes Care, October 1, 2004; 27(10): 2564 - 2565. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Mullan, C. N. Ennis, H. J. P. Fee, I. S. Young, and D. R. McCance Protective effects of ascorbic acid on arterial hemodynamics during acute hyperglycemia Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): H1262 - H1268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Mottram, B. Haluska, R. Leano, D. Cowley, M. Stowasser, and T. H. Marwick Effect of Aldosterone Antagonism on Myocardial Dysfunction in Hypertensive Patients With Diastolic Heart Failure Circulation, August 3, 2004; 110(5): 558 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. L. Pauca, N. D. Kon, and M. F. O'Rourke The second peak of the radial artery pressure wave represents aortic systolic pressure in hypertensive and elderly patients Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2004; 92(5): 651 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H.-Y. Hsu, Y.-T. Chen, H.-H. Hu, R. Aaslid, and D. W. Newell Limitations in Estimating Critical Closing Pressure by Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements * Response: Limitations in Estimating Critical Closing Pressure by Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements Stroke, May 1, 2004; 35(5): e91 - e92. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Ikonomidis, J. Lekakis, K. Stamatelopoulos, N. Markomihelakis, P. G. Kaklamanis, and M. Mavrikakis Aortic elastic properties and left ventricular diastolic function in patients with Adamantiades-Behcet's disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 17, 2004; 43(6): 1075 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Hope, D. B. Tay, I. T. Meredith, and J. D. Cameron Use of Arterial Transfer Functions for the Derivation of Central Aortic Waveform Characteristics in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease Diabetes Care, March 1, 2004; 27(3): 746 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G J Nollen, B E Westerhof, M Groenink, A Osnabrugge, E E van der Wall, and B J M Mulder Aortic pressure-area relation in Marfan patients with and without {beta} blocking agents: a new non-invasive approach Heart, March 1, 2004; 90(3): 314 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Weber, J. Auer, M. F. O'Rourke, E. Kvas, E. Lassnig, R. Berent, and B. Eber Arterial Stiffness, Wave Reflections, and the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, January 20, 2004; 109(2): 184 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Vlachopoulos, K. Hirata, and M. F O'Rourke Effect of sildenafil on arterial stiffness and wave reflection Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2003; 8(4): 243 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. F. O'Rourke, A. Avolio, A. Qasem, S. C. Millasseau, J. M. Ritter, and P. J. Chowienczyk Clinical Assessment of Wave Reflection * Response: Augmentation Index and the Radial-to-Aortic Transfer Function Hypertension, November 1, 2003; 42 (5): e15 - e16. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Hope, I. T. Meredith, J. D. Cameron, S. C. Millasseau, J. M. Ritter, and P. J. Chowienczyk Is There Any Advantage to Using an Arterial Transfer Function? * Response: Aortic Augmentation Index and Radial-to-Aortic Transfer Function Hypertension, September 1, 2003; e7(3): . [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Smulyan, D. S. Siddiqui, R. J. Carlson, G. M. London, and M. E. Safar Clinical Utility of Aortic Pulses and Pressures Calculated From Applanated Radial-Artery Pulses Hypertension, August 1, 2003; 42(2): 150 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R Klocke, J R Cockcroft, G J Taylor, I R Hall, and D R Blake Arterial stiffness and central blood pressure, as determined by pulse wave analysis, in rheumatoid arthritis Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 2003; 62(5): 414 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. E. McVeigh Pulse Waveform Analysis and Arterial Wall Properties Hypertension, May 1, 2003; 41(5): 1010 - 1011. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Millasseau, S. J. Patel, S. R. Redwood, J. M. Ritter, and P. J. Chowienczyk Pressure Wave Reflection Assessed From the Peripheral Pulse: Is a Transfer Function Necessary? Hypertension, May 1, 2003; 41(5): 1016 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M.A. Henry, P. J. Kostense, A. M.W. Spijkerman, J. M. Dekker, G. Nijpels, R. J. Heine, O. Kamp, N. Westerhof, L. M. Bouter, and C. D.A. Stehouwer Arterial Stiffness Increases With Deteriorating Glucose Tolerance Status: The Hoorn Study Circulation, April 29, 2003; 107(16): 2089 - 2095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C L Turner, N Mendoza, R D Illingworth, and P J Kirkpatrick Measurement of pulse pressure profiles in patients with trigeminal neuralgia J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2003; 74(4): 533 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Oliver and D. J. Webb Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Stiffness and Risk of Atherosclerotic Events Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2003; 23(4): 554 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Lurbe, M. I. Torro, E. Carvajal, V. Alvarez, and J. Redon Birth Weight Impacts on Wave Reflections in Children and Adolescents Hypertension, March 1, 2003; 41(3): 646 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Tamminen, J. Westerbacka, S. Vehkavaara, and H. Yki-Jarvinen Insulin-Induced Decreases in Aortic Wave Reflection and Central Systolic Pressure Are Impaired in Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, December 1, 2002; 25(12): 2314 - 2319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. V. R. K. Sharma, P. A. Woods, C. T. Lambrew, C. M. Berg, D. A. Pietro, T. P. Rocco, F. W. Welt, P. Sacchetti, and K. M. McIntyre Evaluation of a Noninvasive System for Determining Left Ventricular Filling Pressure Arch Intern Med, October 14, 2002; 162(18): 2084 - 2088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. London, S. J. Marchais, A. P. Guerin, F. Metivier, and H. Adda Arterial structure and function in end-stage renal disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 1713 - 1724. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. North, J. W. MacCluer, R. B. Devereux, B. V. Howard, T. K. Welty, L. G. Best, E. T. Lee, R. R. Fabsitz, and M. J. Roman Heritability of Carotid Artery Structure and Function: The Strong Heart Family Study Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2002; 22(10): 1698 - 1703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Simmons, A. G. Gillin, and R. W. Jeremy Structural and functional changes in left ventricle during normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancy Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2002; 283(4): H1627 - H1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Cockcroft and I. B. Wilkinson reliability of transfer function in determining central pulse pressure and augmentation index: Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1196 - 1197. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Hope, I. T. Meredith, and J. D. Cameron Reliability of transfer functions in determining central pulse pressure and augmentation index J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1196 - 1196. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Hope, D. B. Tay, I. T. Meredith, and J. D. Cameron Comparison of generalized and gender-specific transfer functions for the derivation of aortic waveforms Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): H1150 - H1156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. S. Hayward, M. Kraidly, C. M. Webb, and P. Collins Assessment of endothelial function using peripheral waveform analysis: A clinical application J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 7, 2002; 40(3): 521 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X J Jiang, M F O'Rourke, W Q L Jin, L S Liu, C W Li, P C Tai, X C Zhang, and S Z Liu Quantification of glyceryl trinitrate effect through analysis of the synthesised ascending aortic pressure waveform Heart, August 1, 2002; 88(2): 143 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Soderstrom, G. Nyberg, M. F. O'Rourke, J. Sellgren, and J. Ponten Can a clinically useful aortic pressure wave be derived from a radial pressure wave?{dagger} Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2002; 88(4): 481 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Safar, J. Blacher, B. Pannier, A. P. Guerin, S. J. Marchais, P.-M. Guyonvarc'h, and G. M. London Central Pulse Pressure and Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Hypertension, March 1, 2002; 39(3): 735 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Romney and R. Z. Lewanczuk Vascular Compliance Is Reduced in the Early Stages of Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes Care, December 1, 2001; 24(12): 2102 - 2106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Vlachopoulos, K. Hirata, and M. F. O'Rourke Pressure-Altering Agents Affect Central Aortic Pressures More Than Is Apparent From Upper Limb Measurements in Hypertensive Patients: The Role of Arterial Wave Reflections Hypertension, December 1, 2001; 38(6): 1456 - 1460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. B. Wilkinson, S. S. Franklin, I. R. Hall, S. Tyrrell, and J. R. Cockcroft Pressure Amplification Explains Why Pulse Pressure Is Unrelated to Risk in Young Subjects Hypertension, December 1, 2001; 38(6): 1461 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||