Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;95:1378-1385

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shwaery, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Keaney, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shwaery, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Keaney, J. F., Jr

(Circulation. 1997;95:1378-1385.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Antioxidant Protection of LDL by Physiological Concentrations of 17ß-Estradiol

Requirement for Estradiol Modification

Glenn T. Shwaery, PhD; Joseph A. Vita, MD; John F. Keaney, Jr, MD

From the Evans Memorial Department of Medicine and Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston (Mass) University Medical Center.

Correspondence to John F. Keaney, Jr, MD, Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Room W507, Boston University Medical Center, 80 E Concord St, Boston, MA 02118. E-mail jkeaney{at}acs.bu.edu.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Exposure to estrogens reduces the risk for coronary artery disease and associated clinical events; however, the mechanisms responsible for these observations are not clear. Supraphysiological levels of estrogens act as antioxidants in vitro, limiting oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), an event implicated in atherogenesis. We investigated the conditions under which physiological concentrations of 17ß-estradiol (E2) inhibit oxidative modification of LDL.

Methods and Results Plasma incubated with E2 (0.1 to 100 nmol/L) for 4 hours yielded LDL that demonstrated a dose-related increase in resistance to oxidation by Cu2+ as measured by conjugated diene formation. This effect was dependent on plasma, because incubation of isolated LDL with E2 at these concentrations in buffered saline produced no effect on Cu2+-mediated oxidation. Incubation of plasma with E2 had no effect on LDL {alpha}-tocopherol content or cholesteryl ester hydroperoxide formation during the 4-hour incubation. Plasma incubation with [3H]E2 was associated with dose-dependent association of 3H with LDL. High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of LDL derived from plasma incubated with [3H]E2 indicated that the majority of the associated species were not detectable as authentic E2 but as nonpolar forms of E2 that were susceptible to base hydrolysis consistent with fatty acid esterification of E2. Plasma-mediated association of E2 and subsequent antioxidant protection was inhibited by 5,5'-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid), an inhibitor of plasma acyltransferase activity.

Conclusions Exposure of LDL to physiological levels of E2 in a plasma milieu is associated with enhanced resistance to Cu2+-mediated oxidation and incorporation of E2 derivatives into LDL. This antioxidant capacity may be another means by which E2 limits coronary artery disease in women.


Key Words: hormones • lipoproteins • women • antioxidants


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Coronary artery disease is more prevalent in men than in age-matched women1 and in postmenopausal than in premenopausal women.2 Furthermore, treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen replacement reduces the incidence of coronary events in this population, even in those with established CAD.3 4 The precise mechanisms responsible for these observations are not clear, although estrogens favorably alter established risk factors for CAD.1 Oral estrogen therapy is associated with increased HDL cholesterol and decreased LDL cholesterol levels,5 although only 25% to 50% of the reduction in CAD with estrogen therapy is due to these alterations in plasma lipid profiles.6 7

The oxidative modification of LDL has been implicated in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis.8 It has been proposed that LDL accumulates in the subendothelial space of lesion-prone arterial sites where vascular cells oxidatively modify this LDL into a form that is internalized by scavenger receptors of resident macrophages, resulting in the formation of "foam cells" that are characteristic of early atherosclerotic lesions.9 10 11 Epitopes from ox-LDL generated in vitro have been identified in atherosclerotic lesions,12 and LDL extracted from these lesions has physicochemical characteristics similar to ox-LDL.13 Moreover, antibodies to ox-LDL have been identified in sera of patients with atherosclerosis.14 Antioxidants that inhibit LDL oxidation have been shown to retard the development of atherosclerosis in animal models,15 and recent reports associate high intake of vitamin E with a reduced risk of CAD in both men and women.16 17

Emerging evidence suggests that estrogens may act as antioxidants. Estrogens with a phenolic structure protect LDL from both cellular and Cu2+-mediated oxidation in vitro.18 19 20 21 One problem with these studies is the requirement of supraphysiological estrogen concentrations (>=1 µmol/L) for meaningful antioxidant protection of LDL. Recently, Sack and colleagues22 demonstrated that E2 treatment of postmenopausal women is associated with increased LDL resistance to ex vivo Cu2+-mediated oxidation. In ovariectomized swine, we have found antioxidant protection of LDL with physiological levels of E2 replacement.23 The mechanism(s) for this antioxidant protection in vivo and the discrepancy between effective doses in vivo and in vitro have yet to be resolved. In the present study, we examined the conditions under which physiological concentrations of E2, the most abundant form of estrogen, provide antioxidant protection of LDL.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
LDL Isolation and Incubation With E2
Blood was collected from healthy, normolipidemic, male donors after an overnight fast into evacuated containers (Becton-Dickinson Co) containing 286 USP U sodium heparin per 15 mL of whole blood. Plasma was prepared by centrifugation (1200g) at 4°C for 15 minutes. Plasma was incubated with ethanolic additions of E2 or E2 17-stearate (both, Steraloids Inc) at final concentrations from 0.1 to 100 nmol/L (final ethanol concentration, 0.2% vol/vol) or vehicle alone for 4 hours at 37°C in the dark sealed under N2 gas. LDL was subsequently isolated by single vertical-spin discontinuous density gradient ultracentrifugation.24 Unbound estrogens and low-molecular-weight contaminants were removed by size-exclusion gel filtration with the use of a Sephadex G-25 column (Pharmacia Biotech, Inc) prepared as previously described.25 Contaminating metal ions were removed by brief treatment of the sample with Chelex-100 resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories) followed by centrifugation (10 000g) for 2 minutes. Protein was determined by a modified procedure of Lowry.26

Alternatively, LDL was isolated from fresh plasma and {approx}0.5 mg/mL LDL (ie, the concentration approximating that in plasma) was incubated with 0.1 to 100 nmol/L E2 or E2 17-stearate in PBS (154 mmol/L NaCl, 10 mmol/L NaH2PO4, pH 7.4) as described above. After incubation, LDL was gel filtered and Chelex treated as described above, followed by protein determination. LDL isolated in this manner contained no detectable lipid hydroperoxides (see below) and was used immediately for experiments.

Measurement of E2
Plasma and LDL E2 levels were quantified by RIA after extraction with ethyl ether as previously described.23 Antibody to E2 (supplied by Dr G.D. Niswender, Colorado State University) showed <5% cross-reactivity with other estrogens (data not shown). Limits of detection for plasma and LDL E2 levels were 0.018 nmol/L and 0.037 pmol/mg LDL protein, respectively. Standard curves were performed with authentic E2 and were unaffected by the presence of LDL or E2 17-stearate.

Oxidative Modification of LDL
For measurement of LDL susceptibility to oxidation, incubations contained 100 µg LDL protein in 1 mL PBS and a final concentration of 3.3 µmol/L CuCl2 or 4.0 mmol/L AAPH (Eastman Kodak). LDL oxidation was monitored by conjugated diene formation at 37°C in a Varian Cary 3 spectrophotometer, and duration of the lag phase was calculated as previously described.27 In selected experiments, LDL oxidation was quantified as the formation of TBARS28 or as an increase in LDL electrophoretic mobility on 0.5% agarose gels29 with the use of a Paragon electrophoresis system (Beckman Instruments) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

LDL Antioxidant and Cholesteryl Ester Hydroperoxide Content
Isolated LDL (250 µg protein) was precipitated with an equal volume of HPLC-grade methanol (Sigma Chemical Co), extracted with 10 volumes of hexane (Aldrich Chemical Co), and centrifuged at 500g for 10 minutes at 4°C. An aliquot of the hexane extract was dried under N2 and resuspended in 0.1 mL ethanol. Vitamin E, ß-carotene, and lycopene were determined by HPLC with electrochemical detection as described previously.30 Aliquots of these samples were also analyzed for cholesteryl ester hydroperoxides by HPLC with postcolumn chemiluminescence detection as described previously.31

Incorporation of [3H]E2 Into LDL
Plasma or isolated LDL was incubated with 0.1 to 100 nmol/L [3H]E2 (DuPont NEN; specific activity, 142 Ci/mmol) as described above for nonradiolabeled E2. After 4-hour incubations, samples were gel filtered through two successive Sephadex G-25 columns to remove free [3H]E2, and the amount of radioactivity associated with LDL was determined by scintillation counting (LKB 1214 Betarack). Limits of detection were 0.7 fmol E2/mg LDL protein. Aliquots of LDL were precipitated with heparin-MnCl232 to determine the amount of [3H]E2 free in solution or bound to albumin, which is reported to be a minor contaminant of the LDL fraction isolated by the single vertical-spin method.24 Electrophoresis of the heparin-MnCl2 precipitate yielded no detectable albumin by Coomassie staining, and <8% of the radioisotope associated with the LDL fraction was present in the albumin-containing supernatant.

HPLC Analysis of LDL and Associated [3H]E2
LDL (200 µg) exposed to [3H]E2 in plasma or PBS was extracted with methanol and hexane as described above. The hexane layer was dried under N2 and reconstituted in ethanol. LDL lipids were chromatographed by use of a 25-cm LC-18 column (Supelco, Inc) and a Hewlett-Packard series 1050 HPLC system with absolute methanol used as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min with UV detection at 210 nm. Elution of [3H]E2 was determined by scintillation counting of 0.3-mL fractions of eluate collected every 18 seconds. For characterization of putative E2 fatty acid esters, aliquots of LDL lipids from incubations with 100 nmol/L [3H]E2 in plasma or PBS were hydrolyzed for 18 hours at 50°C in 90% aqueous methanol solution with 0.5% NaHCO3 or 1% K2CO3 (both wt/vol), as previously described,33 34 before extraction and detection by HPLC as described above. Preliminary experiments with E2 3-stearate (kindly provided by Dr R. Hochberg, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn) and E2 17-stearate confirmed earlier reports that C3 esters (phenolic esters) are easily hydrolyzed by a weak base such as NaHCO3,33 whereas C17 esters require aggressive hydrolysis with K2CO3.34

E2 Modification and LDL Oxidation
To inhibit E2 modification, plasma was incubated with 10 nmol/L E2 or [3H]E2 as described above in the presence of vehicle (DMSO, final volume 0.7%) or 1.4 mmol/L DTNB (ICN Biomedicals, Inc), which inhibits LCAT activity by >=90%.35 After incubation, association of [3H]E2 with isolated LDL was determined by scintillation counting, and resistance to Cu2+-mediated oxidation was measured as described above.

Data Analysis
All data are reported as mean±SE. The measures of LDL oxidative resistance and LDL antioxidant content were compared among treatment groups by ANOVA and a post hoc Bonferroni t test or Dunn's multiple comparison test where appropriate. Statistical significance was accepted if the null hypothesis was rejected with a value of P<.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The coincubation of E2 with isolated LDL in PBS was associated with dose-dependent inhibition of LDL oxidation (Fig 1Down). Consistent with previous reports,19 20 we did not observe meaningful inhibition of LDL oxidation with E2 concentrations <1 µmol/L. At 1 µmol/L, E2 equally protected LDL from Cu2+- or AAPH-mediated oxidation, with corresponding increases in the lag phase of 26% and 29%.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Antioxidant protection of LDL against Cu2+- and AAPH-mediated LDL oxidation by coincubation with E2. LDL (0.1 mg protein/mL) was incubated with 3.3 µmol/L Cu2+ (A) or 4 mmol/L AAPH (B) in the presence of 0 ({bullet}), 10 ({circ}), 100 ({blacksquare}), 1000 ({square}), or 5000 ({blacktriangleup}) nmol/L E2. LDL oxidation was monitored at 5-minute intervals as the increase in absorbance at 234 nm over time. For clarity, symbols are shown for every fourth data point. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

In vivo, LDL is exposed to E2 (0.15 to 2 nmol/L36 ) in a plasma milieu. Therefore, we incubated plasma with 0.1 to 100 nmol/L E2 before LDL isolation and determined the resistance of this isolated LDL to Cu2+-mediated oxidation. Incubation of plasma with 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 nmol/L E2 prolonged LDL resistance to Cu2+-mediated oxidation by -4±6%, 15±6%, 26±4%, and 44±3%, respectively (Fig 2ADown; P=.00014 for trend by ANOVA). Assessment of LDL oxidation by TBARS or relative electrophoretic mobility revealed a similar dose-dependent inhibition of Cu2+-induced oxidation (Fig 2Down, B and C). In contrast, if LDL was first isolated from plasma then incubated for 4 hours with 0.1 to 100 nmol/L E2 in PBS before E2 removal by gel filtration, we did not observe protection against Cu2+-mediated oxidation (data not shown). Thus, antioxidant protection of LDL by physiological concentrations of E2 requires that LDL be exposed to E2 in a plasma milieu.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of LDL preincubation with E2 in plasma on LDL resistance to Cu2+-induced oxidation. LDL was isolated from plasma incubated with 0 ({bullet}), 0.1 ({circ}), 1 ({blacksquare}), 10 ({square}), or 100 ({blacktriangleup}) nmol/L E2 for 4 hours at 37°C in the dark under N2. LDL (0.1 mg protein/mL) was incubated with 3.3 µmol/L Cu2+ and resistance to oxidation quantified by (A) conjugated diene formation, (B) TBARS formation, and (C) electrophoretic mobility on agarose gel after 6-hour exposure to Cu2+. n indicates native LDL; MDA, malondialdehyde. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

To compare the effect of E2 with a more traditional antioxidant, we incubated plasma with 60, 90, or 120 µmol/L {alpha}-tocopherol for 4 hours, isolated LDL, and examined LDL resistance to Cu2+-mediated oxidation. In these experiments, {alpha}-tocopherol prolonged LDL resistance to oxidation by 16%, 29%, and 41% (mean of two independent experiments; data not shown), which is comparable to previous reports.37 38 Thus, the antioxidant protection afforded by physiological levels of E2 is comparable to that obtained with physiological concentrations of {alpha}-tocopherol.

We investigated the time course for E2-mediated protection against LDL oxidation by incubating plasma with 10 nmol/L E2 for 1 to 4 hours before LDL isolation and exposure to Cu2+. Preincubation of plasma with 10 nmol/L E2 for 1, 2, or 4 hours increased LDL resistance to oxidation by 15±5%, 13±2%, and 25±10%, respectively (P=NS for 1 versus 2 or 4 hours, n=3; data not shown).

Persistent antioxidant protection by E2 after LDL isolation from plasma suggests some alteration in the LDL particle that imparts resistance to Cu2+-mediated oxidation. For example, E2 is known to regenerate {alpha}-tocopherol from its oxidized form,39 and LDL enrichment with {alpha}-tocopherol is associated with increased LDL resistance to oxidation.37 38 Similarly, "preformed" lipid hydroperoxides are important determinants of LDL resistance to oxidation.40 To investigate the effect of plasma E2 incubation on these determinants, LDL was isolated from fresh plasma or from plasma incubated with 0.1 to 100 nmol/L E2 or vehicle for 4 hours, and LDL antioxidant and cholesteryl ester hydroperoxide content were measured. As shown in Table 1Down, the LDL content of antioxidants ({alpha}-tocopherol, lycopene, and ß-carotene) was not significantly altered by incubation with E2 in plasma (P=NS for before and after a 4-hour incubation). Similar results were observed with all E2 concentrations. Additionally, there was no detectable formation of cholesteryl ester hydroperoxides in LDL incubated with E2 or vehicle for 4 hours.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of Plasma Incubation With E2 on LDL Content of Antioxidants and Cholesteryl Ester Hydroperoxides

The incorporation of E2 into LDL as a means of protection against Cu2+-mediated oxidation was investigated by incubating plasma or isolated LDL (0.5 to 0.7 mg/mL in PBS, equivalent to the LDL concentrations in donor plasma) with 0.1 to 100 nmol/L [3H]E2 or unlabeled E2 for 4 hours. As shown in Table 2Down, incubation of plasma with increasing concentrations of [3H]E2 was associated with dose-dependent incorporation of the radioisotope into LDL isolated from this plasma (P=.0013 for trend by ANOVA). In contrast, incubation of LDL with [3H]E2 in PBS resulted in {approx}5-fold less association of the radioisotope (Table 2Down; P<.05 versus plasma incubation). Thus, plasma facilitates the association of E2 with LDL.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. LDL Incorporation of Estradiol

Parallel experiments performed with unlabeled E2 indicate that this associated species is not recognized as authentic E2 by RIA (Table 2Up). With plasma incubations of 100 nmol/L E2, the amount of LDL-associated E2 detected by scintillation counting was 18 times that detected by RIA. In contrast, LDL incubated with E2 in PBS demonstrated comparable E2 associations with the use of either detection method. Importantly, RIA detection of E2 was not impaired by the presence of LDL at concentrations as high as 1 mg/mL (data not shown). Thus, incubation of plasma with E2 results in enhanced association of E2 with LDL, primarily in a form not recognized as authentic E2.

To characterize the E2 that associates with LDL, we incubated plasma or LDL (0.5 to 0.7 mg/mL in PBS) with 100 nmol/L [3H]E2 for 4 hours, isolated and filtered the LDL, and then subjected the LDL lipids to HPLC and collected fractions for liquid scintillation counting. As shown in Fig 3Down, incubation of LDL with [3H]E2 in PBS resulted in the recovery of 3H principally in the fraction that coelutes with authentic E2. In contrast, plasma incubations yielded LDL carrying a small amount of authentic [3H]E2 and three major radiolabeled species that were more hydrophobic than authentic E2. None of the fractions appeared to be conversions to either estriol or estrone (retention times of 3.5 and 3.8 minutes, respectively). Thus, incubation of E2 with LDL in a plasma milieu results in conversion of E2 into nonpolar derivatives that associate with the lipoprotein particle.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Characterization of [3H]E2 species that associate with LDL in plasma or PBS. Plasma or LDL (0.5 to 0.7 mg/mL in PBS) was incubated with 100 nmol/L [3H]E2 for 4 hours followed by LDL isolation and gel filtration. LDL lipids were extracted with methanol/hexane and subjected to HPLC analysis as described in "Methods." Fractions (0.3 mL) were collected and analyzed by scintillation counting. A, Chromatogram of E2 standards. B, Radiochromatogram of [3H]E2 associated with LDL in plasma or PBS. C, Radiochromatogram of LDL lipids subjected to hydrolysis with NaHCO3 (dashed line) or K2CO3 (solid line). Authentic E2 was quantitatively recovered on hydrolysis with K2CO3. Data are representative of four experiments. AU indicates absorbance units.

One well-described set of hydrophobic E2 conjugates that form in vivo are the fatty acid esters of E2.33 The esterification of E2 may occur at either of the hydroxy groups. To determine if the nonpolar forms of E2 described herein were consistent with esters of E2, we isolated LDL from plasma incubated with 100 nmol/L [3H]E2 and hydrolyzed the LDL for 18 hours at 50°C. Hydrolyzed LDL was extracted with methanol/hexane and the LDL extract subjected to HPLC as above. As shown in Fig 3CUp, the three major nonpolar species of E2 were hydrolyzed by K2CO3 but were resistant to hydrolysis by NaHCO3. Additionally, the radiolabeled material from the hydrolyzed species was quantitatively recovered in the more polar fraction corresponding to authentic E2. Thus, incubation of plasma with E2 results in the conversion of E2 to more nonpolar forms that have chemical characteristics of E2 esterified with fatty acids at the C17 position.

The esterification of E2 with fatty acids in vivo is not well characterized but is believed to be mediated by enzymatic processes. One candidate for esterification of E2 is LCAT associated with plasma HDL.41 LCAT has critical sulfhydryl groups inhibited by thiol-blocking agents such as DTNB.35 We incubated LDL in PBS containing 10 nmol/L [3H]E2 and 1.4 mmol/L DTNB and found a 12±7% inhibition of [3H]E2 association with LDL (Table 3Down). In contrast, incubation of plasma with [3H]E2 and DTNB resulted in a 69±19% decrease in radiolabeled material associated with LDL (P<.05 versus PBS incubation). In addition, these incubation conditions prevented the antioxidant protection by E2 of LDL as measured by the formation of conjugated dienes in response to Cu2+ (Table 3Down). Thus, modification of E2 appears to be necessary for antioxidant protection of LDL at physiologically relevant concentrations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Effects of DTNB on Estradiol Association With LDL and Antioxidant Protection Against Cu2+-Mediated Oxidation

The oxidation of LDL by Cu2+ or AAPH proceeds through fundamentally different mechanisms. AAPH-mediated LDL oxidation involves direct peroxyl radical attack on LDL polyunsaturated fatty acids.42 In contrast, Cu2+-mediated LDL oxidation requires binding43 and subsequent reduction of Cu2+ by LDL.44 To gain insight into the mechanism(s) responsible for E2-mediated antioxidant protection of LDL, plasma was incubated with 0.1 to 100 nmol/L E2 for 4 hours, LDL was isolated, and it was subsequently incubated with 3.3 µmol/L Cu2+ or 4 mmol/L AAPH. LDL resistance to AAPH-mediated oxidation was not affected by plasma incubation with E2 (Fig 4ADown), whereas Cu2+-induced LDL oxidation was inhibited (Fig 4BDown).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of LDL preincubation with E2 in plasma on LDL resistance to AAPH-induced oxidation. A, LDL was prepared after plasma preincubation with 0 ({bullet}), 0.1 ({circ}), 1 ({blacksquare}), 10 ({square}), or 100 ({blacktriangleup}) nmol/L E2 as in Fig 2Up, incubated (0.1 mg LDL protein/mL) with 4 mmol/L AAPH, and LDL oxidation monitored as the change in absorbance at 234 nm. B, The same LDL preparation (0.1 mg LDL protein/mL) from plasma incubated with 0 ({bullet}) and 10 ({square}) nmol/L E2 was incubated with 3.3 µmol/L Cu2+ and LDL oxidation monitored as in A. Data are derived from one experiment representative of three.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The data presented herein demonstrate that incubation of plasma with physiological concentrations of E2 increases the resistance of LDL to Cu2+-mediated oxidation in vitro. However, antioxidant activity of E2 was not observed against AAPH-mediated modification, nor was oxidative resistance effectively increased when isolated LDL was exposed to E2 at concentrations <=100 nmol/L in the absence of plasma. The increased LDL oxidative resistance with E2 treatment in plasma was not associated with LDL incorporation of E2 that could be detected by RIA. However, incubations with radiolabeled E2 suggest that plasma facilitates the association of LDL with a derivative of E2 that is consistent with E2 esterification at the C17 position. Moreover, this modification of E2 appears to be required for antioxidant protection because inhibiting E2 modification with DTNB prevents both E2 association with LDL and antioxidant protection.

Our observations in vitro support those of Sack and colleagues22 in which a single infusion of E2 in postmenopausal women resulted in a 36% increase in LDL resistance to Cu2+-mediated oxidation. This infusion raised plasma E2 from 55 pmol/L to 1.6 nmol/L, a level comparable to that observed in premenopausal women.36 We found a similar 15% to 26% increase in LDL resistance to Cu2+-mediated oxidation by incubating plasma with 1 to 10 nmol/L E2. In addition, this increase in LDL resistance to oxidation by E2 is comparable to that observed with oral vitamin E supplementation (400 to 800 mg/d)45 and with incubations of plasma in vitro with <=10x the physiological concentration of {alpha}-tocopherol.37 38 Sack and coworkers22 found that LDL oxidative resistance was not significantly associated with plasma E2 concentration, although they did not assess association of E2 with LDL. Thus, the study by Sack and colleagues is in general agreement with our observations that exposure of LDL in plasma to exogenous E2 alone is sufficient to alter LDL oxidative susceptibility ex vivo. The greater increase in lag time noted above in postmenopausal women compared with our incubations (36% versus 26%) may be gender related or reflect a more efficient mechanism for E2 association with LDL in vivo.

The increase in oxidative resistance of LDL exposed to E2 in plasma did not result from changes in LDL antioxidants during incubation (Table 1Up). Increases in LDL {alpha}-tocopherol, the most prevalent lipid-soluble antioxidant in LDL, result in increased resistance to oxidation.37 38 As previously described for ascorbate,46 estrogens regenerate {alpha}-tocopherol from the {alpha}-tocopheroxyl radical.39 However, it is unlikely that this was the operative mechanism whereby E2 altered LDL resistance to oxidation because no significant changes in LDL {alpha}-tocopherol resulted from a 4-hour exposure to E2 in plasma.

We found no detectable cholesteryl ester hydroperoxides in LDL derived from plasma incubated at 37°C for 4 hours (Table 1Up). The presence of preformed lipid hydroperoxides in LDL is directly associated with decreased resistance to Cu2+-mediated oxidation.40 The absence of lipid hydroperoxides in our preparations indicates that E2 did not inhibit Cu2+-mediated LDL oxidation simply by limiting the generation of preformed hydroperoxides in LDL.

Previous in vitro studies have demonstrated that E2 acts as a classic chain-breaking antioxidant with free radical scavenging activity against both aqueous and lipid peroxyl radicals47 and prevents LDL oxidation with a potency equivalent to probucol.18 Our data with supraphysiological (micromolar) levels of E2 show equivalent protection of LDL against Cu2+- and AAPH-mediated oxidation (Fig 1Up), consistent with free radical scavenging activity. In contrast, our data contain two lines of evidence indicating that antioxidant protection of LDL at physiological E2 concentrations is dependent on a different mechanism. First, this protection requires incubation of E2 with LDL in plasma (Fig 2Up). Second, E2 protects LDL against Cu2+-mediated but not aqueous peroxyl radical–mediated oxidation (Fig 4Up). An important implication of the latter observation is that antioxidant protection of LDL by physiological E2 concentrations may not be a consequence of general free radical scavenging.

In the present study, we found that incubation of plasma with [3H]E2 resulted in a dose-dependent association of the radiolabeled material with LDL and subsequent antioxidant protection, whereas this association and protection was significantly decreased in PBS (Table 2Up). These observations parallel those of Esterbauer and colleagues38 with {alpha}-tocopherol. Only LDL exposed to {alpha}-tocopherol in plasma, not PBS, showed significant enrichment of LDL with {alpha}-tocopherol and subsequent protection against Cu2+-mediated oxidation. Moreover, in the present study, the enhanced association of E2 with LDL in plasma is linked to the conversion of E2 into nonpolar derivatives not recognized by RIA (Table 2Up).

One potential candidate for this E2 derivative that is consistent with these data is a fatty acid ester of E2. Fatty acid esters of E2 have been identified in plasma and are concentrated in adipose stores of both premenopausal and postmenopausal women.48 Consistent with the E2 derivatives observed in the present study, fatty acid esters of E2 are not detectable by E2 RIA without base hydrolysis.34 Lipid extracts of LDL incubated with [3H]E2 in plasma contained 3H-compounds more hydrophobic than E2 (Fig 3Up). Moreover, these compounds were resistant to NaHCO3 but susceptible to K2CO3 hydrolysis, consistent with conjugation at C17 and preservation of the antioxidant structure of the phenolic E2 ring.33 34 Thus, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that coincubation of E2 and LDL in plasma leads to the formation of E2 derivatives with characteristics of E2 fatty acid esters, which are the principal forms of E2 associated with LDL. These conjugates most likely escape recognition by RIA, and thus plasma and perhaps more importantly tissue estradiol concentrations in vivo are greater than values reported by standard RIA.

Because incubation conditions that result in the enhanced association of [3H]E2 with LDL are also those that lead to increased LDL resistance to Cu2+-mediated oxidation, one must consider that the modification of E2 is responsible for the observed antioxidant protection. Indeed, incubation of plasma with 10 nmol/L E2 resulted in a 26% increase in LDL resistance to oxidation and significant association of 3H-material with LDL that was not detectable as authentic E2 (Table 2Up; Fig 3BUp). Estradiol 17-stearate, a model long-chain fatty acid derivative of E2, did not demonstrate antioxidant protection when incubated with LDL in either plasma or PBS (data not shown). Because E2 esters are extremely hydrophobic, we cannot discount the possibility that E2 17-stearate is insoluble in the aqueous environment of our experiments and therefore may not have associated with LDL. It is also possible that E2 modification and associated antioxidant protection take place on the surface of the LDL particle and thus, preformed E2 17-stearate has no effect.

However, it is difficult to reconcile the quantity of E2 (or E2 derivative) that associates with LDL and the degree of antioxidant protection we observed in the present study. Indeed, incubation of LDL with 100 nmol/L E2 in PBS resulted in nearly twice the association of E2 equivalents with LDL but none of the antioxidant protection afforded by 10 nmol/L E2 in plasma (Table 2Up). Plasma incubation with 100 nmol/L [3H]E2 resulted in stable association of radiolabeled material with LDL in the amount of 3.4 pmol/mg LDL protein ({approx}2% of [3H]E2 added; Table 2Up). This corresponds to a ratio of 1 E2 equivalent to {approx}500 LDL particles. Although plasma incubations with DTNB inhibited the association of E2 with LDL and prevented antioxidant protection of LDL (Table 3Up), it is extremely unlikely that such a small amount of E2 (or derivative) might directly inhibit Cu2+-mediated LDL oxidation by direct interception of free radical species, even though modification at C17 preserves the intact phenolic hydroxyl group and thus antioxidant capacity. One could speculate that incorporation of preformed E2 conjugates into LDL or the enzymatic modification of E2 on the surface of the LDL particle may catalyze a process that promotes a stable modification of LDL and interferes with Cu2+ binding and/or reduction by LDL. A similar process has been observed with antioxidant protection of LDL by the ascorbic acid oxidation product, dehydroascorbic acid. Incubation of LDL with dehydroascorbic acid modifies LDL in a manner that inhibits Cu2+- but not AAPH-mediated oxidation.25

To date, the mechanisms of LDL oxidation in vivo are unknown. It is hypothesized that vascular cells modify LDL into its atherogenic form,9 10 11 but redox active metals in the vascular wall may also act on subendothelial lipoproteins.49 The data presented herein indicate that short-term exposure to physiological concentrations of E2 has the potential to increase LDL resistance to Cu2+-mediated modification. This effect of E2 is dependent on a plasma milieu and results in the association of E2 with LDL in a form that is chemically similar to an E2 ester. These findings suggest a means by which physiological levels of E2 may limit the oxidation of LDL in vivo and perhaps help to explain the reduced incidence of CAD in premenopausal women compared with men.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
AAPH = 2,2'-azo-bis(2-amidinopropane)dihydrochloride
CAD = coronary artery disease
DTNB = 5,5'-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid)
E2 = 17ß-estradiol
HPLC = high-performance liquid chromatography
LCAT = lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase
ox-LDL = oxidized LDL
RIA = radioimmunoassay
TBARS = thiobarbituric acid–reactive substances


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from the Council for Tobacco Research-USA, Inc (No. 4073); the American Heart Association, Massachusetts Affiliate; and the National Institutes of Health (NIH; HL-52936). Joseph A. Vita, MD, is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association and John F. Keaney, Jr, MD, is the recipient of a Clinical Investigator Development Award (HL-03195) from the NIH. We gratefully acknowledge Dr Richard Hochberg for providing 17ß-estradiol 3-stearate and Dr Gordon Niswender for providing antibody to 17ß-estradiol. We thank Balz Frei for assistance with the cholesteryl ester hydroperoxide assay and critical reading of this manuscript.

Received October 10, 1996; revision received November 11, 1996; accepted November 17, 1996.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Barrett-Connor E, Bush TL. Estrogen and coronary heart disease in women. JAMA. 1991;265:1861-1867. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Kannel WB, Hjortland M, McNamara PM, Gordon T. Menopause and the risk of cardiovascular disease: the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med. 1976;85:447-452.

3. Stampfer JM, Colditz FA, Willett WC, Manson JE, Rosner B, Speizer F, Hennekens CH. Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:756-762. [Abstract]

4. Ettinger B, Friedman GD, Bush T, Quesenberry CP Jr. Reduced mortality associated with long-term postmenopausal estrogen therapy. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:6-12. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Walsh BW, Schiff I, Rosner B, Greenberg L, Ravnikar V, Sacks FM. Effects of postmenopausal estrogen replacement on the concentrations and metabolism of plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1196-1204. [Abstract]

6. Gruchow HW, Anderson AJ, Barboriak JJ, Sobocinski KA. Postmenopausal use of estrogen and occlusion of coronary arteries. Am Heart J. 1988;115:954-963. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Bush TL, Barrett-Connor E, Cowan LD, Criqui MH, Wallace RB, Suchindran CM, Tyroler HA, Rifkind BM. Cardiovascular mortality and noncontraceptive use of estrogen in women: results from the Lipid Research Clinics Program Follow-up Study. Circulation. 1987;75:1102-1109. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Steinberg D, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Khoo JC, Witztum JL. Beyond cholesterol: modifications of low-density lipoprotein that increase its atherogenicity. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:915-924. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Steinbrecher UP, Parthasarathy S, Leake DS, Witztum JL, Steinberg D. Modification of low density lipoprotein by endothelial cells involves lipid peroxidation and degradation of low density lipoprotein phospholipids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81:3883-3887. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Parthasarathy S, Printz DJ, Boyd D, Joy L, Steinberg D. Macrophage oxidation of low density lipoprotein generates a modified form recognized by the scavenger receptor. Arteriosclerosis. 1986;6:505-510. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Heinecke JW, Rosen H, Chait A. Iron and copper promote modification of low density lipoprotein by arterial smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1984;74:1890-1894.

12. Palinski W, Rosenfeld ME, Ylä-Herttuala S, Gurtner GC, Socher SS, Butler SW, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Steinberg D, Witztum JL. Low density lipoprotein undergoes oxidative modification in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:1372-1376. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Ylä-Herttuala S, Palinski W, Rosenfeld ME, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Butler S, Witztum JL, Steinberg D. Evidence for the presence of oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein in atherosclerotic lesions of rabbit and man. J Clin Invest. 1989;84:1086-1095.

14. Salonen JT, Ylä-Herttuala S, Yamamoto R, Butler S, Korpela H, Salonen S, Nyyssönen K, Palinski W, Witztum J. Autoantibody against oxidised LDL and progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1992;339:883-887. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Carew TE, Schwenke DC, Steinberg D. Antiatherogenic effect of probucol unrelated to its hypocholesterolemic effect: evidence that antioxidants in vivo can selectively inhibit low density lipoprotein degradation in macrophage-rich fatty streaks and slow the progression of atherosclerosis in the Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:7725-7729. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A, Giovannucci E, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Vitamin E consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in men. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1450-1456. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willett W. Vitamin E consumption and the risk of coronary disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1444-1449. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Huber L, Scheffler E, Poll R, Zeigler R, Dresel HA. 17 Beta estradiol inhibits LDL oxidation and cholesteryl ester formation in cultured macrophages. Free Radic Res Comm. 1990;8:167-173. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Mazière C, Auclair M, Ronoveaux MF, Salmon S, Santus R, Mazière JC. Estrogens inhibit copper and cell-mediated modification of low density lipoprotein. Arteriosclerosis. 1991;89:175-182.

20. Rifici VA, Khachadurian AK. The inhibition of low-density lipoprotein oxidation by 17-beta estradiol. Metabolism. 1992;41:1110-1114. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Tang M, Abplanalp W, Ayres S, Subbiah MTR. Superior and distinct antioxidant effects of selected estrogen metabolites on lipid peroxidation. Metabolism. 1996;45:411-414. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Sack MN, Rader DJ, Cannon RO III. Oestrogen and inhibition of oxidation of low-density lipoproteins in postmenopausal women. Lancet. 1994;343:269-270. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Keaney JF Jr, Shwaery GT, Xu A, Nicolosi RJ, Loscalzo J, Foxall TL, Vita JA. 17ß-Estradiol preserves endothelial vasodilator function and limits LDL oxidation in hypercholesterolemic swine. Circulation. 1994;89:2251-2259. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Chung BH, Segrest JP, Ray MJ, Brunzell JD, Hokanson JE, Krauss RM, Beaudrie K, Cone JT. Single vertical spin density gradient ultracentrifugation. Methods Enzymol. 1986;128:181-209. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Retsky KL, Freeman MW, Frei B. Ascorbic acid oxidation product(s) protect human low density lipoprotein against atherogenic modification: anti- rather than prooxidant activity of vitamin C in the presence of transition metal ions. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:1304-1309. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Peterson GL. A simplification of the protein assay method of Lowry et al which is more generally applicable. Anal Biochem. 1977;83:346-356. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Esterbauer H, Striegl H, Puhl H, Rotheneder M. Continuous monitoring of in vitro oxidation of human low density lipoprotein. Free Radic Res Comm. 1989;6:67-75. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Beuge JA, Aust SD. Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol. 1978;52:302-310. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Noble RP. Electrophoretic separation of plasma lipoproteins in agarose gel. J Lipid Res. 1968;9:693-700. [Abstract]

30. Stocker R, Frei B. Endogenous antioxidant defences in human blood plasma. In: Sies H, ed. Oxidative Stress: Oxidants and Antioxidants. London, UK: Academic Press; 1991:213-243.

31. Frei B, Yamamoto Y, Niclas D, Ames BN. Evaluation of an isoluminol chemiluminescence assay for the detection of hydroperoxides in human blood plasma. Anal Biochem. 1988;175:120-130. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Warnick GR, Nguyen T, Albers AA. Comparison of improved precipitation methods for quantitation of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Clin Chem. 1985;31:217-222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Mellon-Nussbaum SH, Ponticorvo L, Schatz F, Hochberg RB. Estradiol fatty acid esters: the isolation and identification of the lipoidal derivative of estradiol synthesized in the bovine uterus. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:5678-5684. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Larner JM, Pahuja SL, Shackleton CH, McMurray WJ, Giordano G, Hochberg RB. The isolation and characterization of estradiol-fatty acid esters in human ovarian follicular fluid: identification of an endogenous long-lived and potent family of estrogens. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:13893-13899. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Bisgaier CL, Sachdev OP, Lee ES, Williams KJ, Blum CB, Glickman RM. Effect of lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase on distribution of apolipoprotein A-IV among lipoproteins of human plasma. J Lipid Res. 1987;28:693-703. [Abstract]

36. Carr BR. Disorders of the ovary and female reproductive tract. In: Wilson JD, Foster DW, eds. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1992:733-798.

37. Hatta A, Frei B. Oxidative modification and antioxidant protection of human low density lipoprotein at high and low oxygen partial pressures. J Lipid Res. 1995;36:2383-2393. [Abstract]

38. Esterbauer H, Dieber-Rotheneder M, Striegl G, Waeg G. Role of vitamin E in preventing the oxidation of low-density lipoprotein. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53(suppl):314S-321S.

39. Mukai K, Daifuku K, Yokoyama S, Nakano M. Stopped-flow investigation of antioxidant activity of estrogens in solution. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1035:348-352. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Frei B, Gaziano JM. Content of antioxidants, preformed lipid hydroperoxides, and cholesterol as predictors of the susceptibility of human LDL to metal ion-dependent and -independent oxidation. J Lipid Res. 1993;34:2135-2145. [Abstract]

41. Pahuja SL, Hochberg RB. A comparison of the esterification of steroids by rat lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase and acyl coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase. Endocrinology. 1995;136:180-186. [Abstract]

42. Keaney JF Jr, Frei B. Antioxidant protection of low-density lipoprotein and its role in the prevention of atherosclerotic vascular disease. In: Frei B, ed. Natural Antioxidants in Human Health and Disease. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 1994:303-352.

43. Kuzuya M, Yamada K, Hayashi T, Funaki C, Naito M, Asai K, Kuzuya F. Role of lipoprotein-copper complex in copper catalyzed-peroxidation of low-density lipoprotein. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992;1123:334-341. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Lynch SM, Frei B. Reduction of copper, but not iron, by human low density lipoprotein (LDL): implications for metal ion-dependent oxidative modification of LDL. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:5158-5163. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Princen HMG, Van Duyvenvoorde W, Buytenhek R, Van Der Laarse A, Van Poppel G, Gevers Leuven JA, Van Hinsbergh VWM. Supplementation with low doses of vitamin E protects LDL from lipid peroxidation in men and women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:325-333. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Scarpa MA, Rigo M, Maiorino M, Ursini F, Gregolin G. Formation of alpha-tocopherol radical and recycling of alpha-tocopherol by ascorbate during peroxidation of phosphatidylcholine liposomes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984;801:215-219. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

47. Niki E, Nakano M. Estrogens as antioxidants. Methods Enzymol. 1990;186:330-333. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

48. Larner JM, Shackleton CHL, Roitman E, Schwartz PE, Hochberg RB. Measurement of estradiol-17-fatty acid esters in human tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75:195-200. [Abstract]

49. Ehrenwald E, Chisolm GM, Fox PL. Intact human ceruloplasmin oxidatively modifies low density lipoprotein. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:1493-1501.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Wang, W. Wang, K. Wahala, H. Adlercreutz, E. Ikonen, and M. J. Tikkanen
Role of lysosomal acid lipase in the intracellular metabolism of LDL-transported dehydroepiandrosterone-fatty acyl esters
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2008; 295(6): E1455 - E1461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Badeau, V. Vihma, T. S. Mikkola, A. Tiitinen, and M. J. Tikkanen
Estradiol Fatty Acid Esters in Adipose Tissue and Serum of Pregnant and Pre- and Postmenopausal Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4327 - 4331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Hockerstedt, M. Jauhiainen, and M. J. Tikkanen
Lecithin/Cholesterol Acyltransferase Induces Estradiol Esterification in High-Density Lipoprotein, Increasing Its Antioxidant Potential
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2004; 89(10): 5088 - 5093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. A. Beckman, A. B. Goldfine, M. B. Gordon, L. A. Garrett, J. F. Keaney Jr., and M. A. Creager
Oral antioxidant therapy improves endothelial function in Type 1 but not Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): H2392 - H2398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Vihma, A. Tiitinen, O. Ylikorkala, and M. J. Tikkanen
Quantitative Determination of Estradiol Fatty Acid Esters in Lipoprotein Fractions in Human Blood
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2552 - 2555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
I. Bureau, E. Gueux, A. Mazur, E. Rock, A.-M. Roussel, and Y. Rayssiguier
Female Rats Are Protected against Oxidative Stress during Copper Deficiency
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2003; 22(3): 239 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Vihma, S. Vehkavaara, H. Yki-Jarvinen, H. Hohtari, and M. J. Tikkanen
Differential Effects of Oral and Transdermal Estradiol Treatment on Circulating Estradiol Fatty Acid Ester Concentrations in Postmenopausal Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 588 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. J Tikkanen, V. Vihma, M. Jauhiainen, A. Hockerstedt, H. Helisten, and M. Kaamanen
Lipoprotein-associated estrogens
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2002; 56(2): 184 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. L. Mershon, R. S. Baker, and K. E. Clark
Estrogen increases iNOS expression in the ovine coronary artery
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): H1169 - H1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
I. Bureau, F. Laporte, M. Favier, H. Faure, M. Fields, A. E. Favier, and A.-M. Roussel
No Antioxidant Effect of Combined HRT on LDL Oxidizability and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Treated Post-Menopausal Women
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., August 1, 2002; 21(4): 333 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Serviddio, G. Loverro, M. Vicino, F. Prigigallo, I. Grattagliano, E. Altomare, and G. Vendemiale
Modulation of Endometrial Redox Balance during the Menstrual Cycle: Relation with Sex Hormones
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2843 - 2848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. C. Zacharia, E. K. Jackson, D. G. Gillespie, and R. K. Dubey
Catecholamines Block 2-Hydroxyestradiol-Induced Antimitogenesis in Mesangial Cells
Hypertension, April 1, 2002; 39(4): 854 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. Hockerstedt, M. J. Tikkanen, and M. Jauhiainen
LCAT facilitates transacylation of 17{beta}-estradiol in the presence of HDL3 subfraction
J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2002; 43(3): 392 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. Pfeilschifter, R. Koditz, M. Pfohl, and H. Schatz
Changes in Proinflammatory Cytokine Activity after Menopause
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2002; 23(1): 90 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. P. V. Dantas, R. C.A. Tostes, Z. B. Fortes, S. G. Costa, D. Nigro, and M. H. C. Carvalho
In Vivo Evidence for Antioxidant Potential of Estrogen in Microvessels of Female Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Hypertension, February 1, 2002; 39(2): 405 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. J. Gruber, W. Tschugguel, C. Schneeberger, and J. C. Huber
Production and Actions of Estrogens
N. Engl. J. Med., January 31, 2002; 346(5): 340 - 352.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
R. RICCIARELLI, J.-M. ZINGG, and A. AZZI
Vitamin E: protective role of a Janus molecule
FASEB J, November 1, 2001; 15(13): 2314 - 2325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
L. C. Zacharia, E. K. Jackson, D. G. Gillespie, and R. K. Dubey
Catecholamines Abrogate Antimitogenic Effects of 2-Hydroxyestradiol on Human Aortic Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, November 1, 2001; 21(11): 1745 - 1750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
V. Vihma, H. Adlercreutz, A. Tiitinen, P. Kiuru, K. Wahala, and M. J. Tikkanen
Quantitative Determination of Estradiol Fatty Acid Esters in Human Pregnancy Serum and Ovarian Follicular Fluid
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2001; 47(7): 1256 - 1262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. Mortensen, V. Breinholt, T. Dalsgaard, H. Frandsen, S. T. Lauridsen, J. Laigaard, B. Ottesen, and J.-J. Larsen
17{beta}-Estradiol but not the phytoestrogen naringenin attenuates aortic cholesterol accumulation in WHHL rabbits
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2001; 42(5): 834 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Helisten, A. Höckerstedt, K. Wähälä, A. Tiitinen, H. Adlercreutz, M. Jauhiainen, and M. J. Tikkanen
Accumulation of High-Density Lipoprotein-Derived Estradiol-17{beta} Fatty Acid Esters in Low-Density Lipoprotein Particles
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2001; 86(3): 1294 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
R. K. Dubey and E. K. Jackson
Estrogen-induced cardiorenal protection: potential cellular, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): F365 - F388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. Sudoh, K. Toba, M. Akishita, J. Ako, M. Hashimoto, K. Iijima, S. Kim, Y.-Q. Liang, Y. Ohike, T. Watanabe, et al.
Estrogen Prevents Oxidative Stress-Induced Endothelial Cell Apoptosis in Rats
Circulation, February 6, 2001; 103(5): 724 - 729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. E. Freedman and J. F. Keaney Jr.
Vitamin E Inhibition of Platelet Aggregation Is Independent of Antioxidant Activity
J. Nutr., February 1, 2001; 131(2): 374S - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, E. K. Jackson, P. J. Keller, B. Imthurn, and M. Rosselli
Estradiol Metabolites Inhibit Endothelin Synthesis by an Estrogen Receptor-Independent Mechanism
Hypertension, February 1, 2001; 37(2): 640 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. C McGill Jr, C A. McMahan, E. E Herderick, G. T Malcom, R. E Tracy, and J. P Strong
Origin of atherosclerosis in childhood and adolescence
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2000; 72 (5): 1307S - 1315S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. Yamakoshi, M. K. Piskula, T. Izumi, K. Tobe, M. Saito, S. Kataoka, A. Obata, and M. Kikuchi
Isoflavone Aglycone-Rich Extract without Soy Protein Attenuates Atherosclerosis Development in Cholesterol-Fed Rabbits
J. Nutr., August 1, 2000; 130(8): 1887 - 1893.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E Sbarouni, C Kroupis, Z.S Kyriakides, K Koniavitou, and D.T Kremastinos
Cell adhesion molecules in relation to simvastatin and hormone replacement therapy in coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2000; 21(12): 975 - 980.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. Teoh, A. Quan, and R. Y.K Man
Acute impairment of relaxation by low levels of testosterone in porcine coronary arteries
Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2000; 45(4): 1010 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
B. A. Walsh, A. E. Mullick, C. E. Banka, and J. C. Rutledge
17{beta}-Estradiol acts separately on the LDL particle and artery wall to reduce LDL accumulation
J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2000; 41(1): 134 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
N. J. Alkayed, S. J. Murphy, R. J. Traystman, P. D. Hurn, and V. M. Miller
Neuroprotective Effects of Female Gonadal Steroids in Reproductively Senescent Female Rats Editorial Comment
Stroke, January 1, 2000; 31(1): 161 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. S. Kanji, W. Kuohung, D. C. Labaree, and R. B. Hochberg
Regiospecific Esterification of Estrogens by Lecithin:Cholesterol Acyltransferase
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 1999; 84(7): 2481 - 2488.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. E. Mendelsohn and R. H. Karas
The Protective Effects of Estrogen on the Cardiovascular System
N. Engl. J. Med., June 10, 1999; 340(23): 1801 - 1811.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
B. A. Walsh, B. L. Busch, A. E. Mullick, K. M. Reiser, and J. C. Rutledge
17ß-Estradiol Reduces Glycoxidative Damage in the Artery Wall
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 1999; 19(4): 840 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. Teoh, S. W.S. Leung, and R. Y.K. Man
Short-term exposure to physiological levels of 17{beta}-estradiol enhances endothelium-independent relaxation in porcine coronary artery
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 1999; 42(1): 224 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. K. Dubey, Y. Y. Tyurina, V. A. Tyurin, D. G. Gillespie, R. A. Branch, E. K. Jackson, and V. E. Kagan
Estrogen and Tamoxifen Metabolites Protect Smooth Muscle Cell Membrane Phospholipids Against Peroxidation and Inhibit Cell Growth
Circ. Res., February 5, 1999; 84(2): 229 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
N. Santanam, R. Shern-Brewer, R. McClatchey, P. Z. Castellano, A. A. Murphy, S. Voelkel, and S. Parthasarathy
Estradiol as an antioxidant: incompatible with its physiological concentrations and function
J. Lipid Res., November 1, 1998; 39(11): 2111 - 2118.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. B. Hochberg
Biological Esterification of Steroids
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 1998; 19(3): 331 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, E. K. Jackson, and P. J. Keller
17{beta}-Estradiol, Its Metabolites, and Progesterone Inhibit Cardiac Fibroblast Growth
Hypertension, January 1, 1998; 31(1): 522 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shwaery, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Keaney, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shwaery, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Keaney, J. F., Jr