(Circulation. 1996;94:3055-3061.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
the Griffith Center and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif.
Key Words: blood flow ischemia revascularization myocardial contraction echocardiography Editorials
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, much work still needs to be done. In the current issue of Circulation, the group from UCLA9 who have made major contributions to HM present data that contribute to an understanding of the response to dobutamine and document reduced resting MBF in HM. Their conclusion that functionally impaired though normally perfused myocardium frequently exists in patients with coronary artery disease is problematic.
| Dobutamine Echocardiography |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study of Sun and coworkers9 from UCLA, using the inotropic agent dobutamine and two-dimensional echocardiography, confirms that patients with perfusion-metabolism mismatch (HM) determined by PET have an inotropic and an attenuated coronary vasodilator reserve, a finding that has been documented in experimental and human studies.6 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 They also document that MBF and exogenous glucose utilization are increased in HM during dobutamine infusion; this provides additional data that the observed improvement in wall motion with dobutamine represents a real improvement of function in these dysfunctional segments.
Dobutamine echocardiography for diagnosis of HM has a positive and negative predictive accuracy of 83% and 81%, respectively.43 Two possible reasons the predictive accuracy is not perfect are that LV wall motion may not have been correctly evaluated and return of function after revascularization may not have been adequately or properly evaluated to correctly assess predictive accuracy. The lack of positive predictive accuracy in
15% could be explained by several factors: one is a tethering effect, that is, dobutamine increases contraction of normal myocardium that drags along the nonviable myocardium, which then appears to have increased contraction. Another explanation is that LV hypokinesis may result from subendocardial infarction that does not improve with dobutamine, but the adjacent normal mid- and epicardium has increased contraction, which is then interpreted as improved LV wall motion with dobutamine.37 40 This is also why it cannot be always assumed that all regions that are hypokinetic at rest will improve with revascularization. The lack of a negative predictive accuracy in
20% may be a result of many factors. These include (1) use of a higher dose of dobutamine may have shown an improvement of LV wall motion that was not seen with a lower dose, (2) MBF and coronary flow reserve may have been reduced to such a marked degree that the myocardium could not respond to dobutamine, and (3) myocardial changes that had occurred in HM may not allow for an adequate immediate response that could be clinically observed.7 42 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
A word of caution is appropriate with regard to the clinical use of dobutamine echocardiography to diagnose HM. Note that one explanation for the increased exogenous glucose utilization in the study of Sun et al9 could have been the production of ischemia caused by a 1-hour infusion of dobutamine for the 18F-deoxyglucose study. In 1976, Willerson et al51 showed that dobutamine in a dose of 20 µg/kg per minute increased regional MBF to all areas of the heart in anesthetized dogs with acute myocardial ischemia and also increased epicardial ST-segmental elevation indicating myocardial injury, effects that were not seen in doses of 4 µg/kg per minute. In experimental studies of short-term hibernation,5 inotropic stimulation with dobutamine and with atrial pacing has been shown to upset the balance between MBF supply and need, thereby producing ischemia16 17 18 51 52 53 or even infarction18 51 52 53 (Fig 1
). This deleterious effect (infarction) appears to be related to the severity of the reduced MBF at rest and the severity and duration of inotropic stimulation. In the early 1970s, inotropic stimulation with isoproterenol and epinephrine was shown to produce deterioration of resting abnormalities of wall motion function in some patients.10 11 12 In experimental animals18 51 52 53 and in patients,27 28 dobutamine may produce deterioration of contraction in dysfunctional segments either initially, which may be the result of production of ischemia in hibernating or in normally contracting myocardium, or after a period of improvement of function; the latter may be more specific for the diagnosis of HM than is only an improvement of function.27 28 There is a tendency to use increasingly larger doses of dobutamine to show improvement and/or deterioration of segmental LV wall motion function, which is appropriate if adequate care is taken to perform the procedure. In all patients undergoing dobutamine echocardiography, the incidence of myocardial infarction was 0.1%54 and of sustained ventricular tachycardia and of ventricular fibrillation resulting from acute ischemia, 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively54 55 ; Nagueh and Zoghbi55 reported being aware of two deaths that occurred at another institution. The incidence may be higher in those with HM because by definition these patients have LV dysfunction at rest and coronary artery disease. I have been made aware of five patients at three medical centers in whom myocardial infarction occurred with dobutamine echocardiography. Thus, it would seem clinically prudent that when dobutamine echocardiography is being performed for diagnosis of HM that an appropriately experienced and skilled physician observe LV wall motion function and (1) the dobutamine is discontinued as soon as possible after a diagnosis of deterioration of LV wall motion function is made with reasonable confidence and (2) if the induced ischemia (ECG changes and/or deterioration of LV function) is not promptly relieved by discontinuing the dobutamine, then the patient should receive appropriate therapy.
|
| Myocardial Blood Flow in Hibernating Myocardium |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sun et al9 state "blood flow did not differ between normal volunteers, normal remote, abnormal remote regions, and mismatches" and conclude that "blood flow-metabolism mismatch patterns are not consistently associated with a fixed downregulation of MBF." Is this a correct interpretation of their data?
To answer this question, one needs to address the issue of the correct reference to which MBF in HM should be compared. Sun et al9 compared it with healthy volunteers who were 37±18 years of age, whereas the patients in their study were much older (63±9 years). In a previous study of healthy volunteers from the same laboratory,59 those 31±9 years of age had a significantly lower MBF than those 64±9 years of age (76±17 versus 92±25 mL/min per 100 g; P<.05), a difference that was partly accounted for by a difference in rate-pressure product. Thus, comparison of MBF in older patients with HM to that in younger healthy people may be inappropriate. MBF measurement by PET has several limitations.57 58 59 60 61 62 For example, MBF measurement by PET assumes that the LV wall thickness is 1.0 cm2,9 59 which may not be true for older healthy volunteers, all people, or all patients. Also, MBF in "normal subjects" by PET with the use of 13N-ammonia shows a very large range of values for the normal range (±2 SD of the mean ranges from
40 to 150 mL/min per 100 g) (Fig 2
); therefore, in any given patient, transmural MBF could be reduced by
50%, and the MBF would still be in the normal range.
|
Normal MBF is determined by myocardial oxygen needs (MVO2). Major determinants of MVO2 include heart rate, myocardial tension (LV volume, mass, and pressure), and myocardial contractility. Rate-pressure product does not give a complete assessment of MVO2 needs and thus of what the normal MBF should be in an individual patient. Therefore, it seems reasonable that MBF in regions of HM should be compared with remote regions of normal MBF and normal function in the same patients, particularly if the MBF in HM is in the "normal range."
In the study of Sun et al,9 MBF at baseline in normal remote regions was available in only 5 of the 10 patients with mismatch. In these 5 patients, MBF was lower in mismatch regions versus that in normal remote regions (59±25 versus 81±26 mL/min per 100 g, P=.004), that is, those with normal function and normal MBF at rest (Fig 3
). Note that MBF in mismatch regions was lower in each patient and that there was also a wide range of MBF in mismatch as well as in normal remote regions. Thus, the study of Sun et al9 actually showed that MBF is reduced at rest in regions of perfusion-metabolism mismatch (HM). Furthermore, all patients in the study of Sun et al9 had multivessel coronary artery disease (50% had three-vessel disease), and thus, the normal remote regions may have been supplied by obstructive coronary artery disease. The wide range of MBF in mismatch regions as well as in the normal remote regions (Fig 3
) emphasizes the importance of comparing paired values from the same patients because in some instances, comparison between groups of patients or with normal volunteers could potentially give misleading information about MBF in HM.
|
Sun et al9 state ". . . relative blood flow in mismatches (as a percentage of blood flow in the normal remote regions in the same patients; n=5) averaged 72±11% at baseline (P<.005)." Can a 28% reduction in transmural MBF result in a reduction of myocardial contraction? Gallagher and coworkers63 have shown in animal experiments that there is a linear relation between reductions in subendocardial blood flow and myocardial contraction. Vatner64 measured subendocardial blood flow in animals and stated that "When blood flow fell by only 10% to 20%, regional function was severely impaired" and there was a ". . . sensitive coupling between blood flow and function in conscious dogs with acute myocardial ischemia." PET measures transmural MBF and at the present time cannot determine subendocardial blood flow in humans because it lacks sufficient spatial resolution. In animals, when transmural MBF falls by
22%, subendocardial blood flow falls by
38% to 48%63 65 (Fig 4
). Thus, a 28% lower transmural MBF in mismatch regions in the Sun et al study can be expected to result in a reduced contraction in the mismatch regions.
|
The conclusion from the data of Sun et al9 that MBF at rest is reduced in HM in patients supports six6 7 41 66 68 69 other earlier studies in patients, five of which measured MBF by PET with the use of 13N-ammonia.6 7 41 66 68 (1) Vanoverschelde et al66 reported on 17 patients who had no infarction, had a totally occluded artery that supplied an area of myocardium that was collateral-dependent for flow, and had resting wall motion abnormality. MBF in LV dysfunctional segments was significantly lower than in normally functioning LV segments in the same 17 patients (77.1±24.6 versus 95.5±26.7 mL/min per 100 g; P<.001; Table).66 67
The importance of comparing MBF in HM with that in normal areas in the same heart can be appreciated from this study.67 MBF in normally functioning LV segments in these 17 patients was greater than that in another group of 9 patients with coronary artery disease and normal LV function (95.5±26 versus 82.7±18.0 mL/min per 100 g; P<.05).66 67 One reason for the increased MBF in the 17 patients with LV dysfunction was that these 17 patients had a 5.6% higher rate-pressure product and 21.7% larger LV volume than the 9 patients with normal LV function67 and thus, their MVO2 needs would be greater.
|
(2)In an earlier report from UCLA in 22 patients with recent myocardial infarction, Czernin et al68 showed that MBF in mismatch regions was lower than in normal regions in the same patients (57±20 versus 83±20 mL/min per 100 g; P<.05). Of the 20 patients who had coronary arteriography, 10, 7, and 3 had one-, two-, and three-vessel disease, respectively.
(3)Marzullo et al6 studied 14 patients with previous myocardial infarction, infarct-related single-vessel coronary artery disease, and regional LV dysfunction. LV segments with impaired LV systolic pump function and metabolically viable myocardium had MBF that was >2 SD below the mean of normally contracting segments (42±12 versus 100±24 mL/min per 100 g).
(4)Sambuceti et al41 studied 19 patients without myocardial infarction, with totally occluded single-vessel coronary artery disease supplying myocardium that was dependent on collaterals for flow; 6 had wall motion abnormalities in the collateral-dependent myocardium. "All six with a wall motion abnormality showed flow values >2 SD below normal values."41
(5)Shivalkar and coworkers7 have shown that 18 of 50 patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery had reduced regional myocardial function (regional ejection fraction), reduced MBF, and normal metabolism (HM). The HM subgroup was the only subgroup that had improved regional ejection fraction after revascularization; MBF also increased after revascularization. Before revascularization, this subgroup had MBF that was 67±10% of control region. The mean 33% reduction in transmural MBF would be expected to result in reduction of subendocardial MBF of
55% to 60%63 65 (Fig 4
). In these 18 patients, MBF in the HM was lower than in the control regions (63.8±12.8 versus 93.4±12.6; P<.005; personal communication, Prof W. Flameng).
(6)Arani et al69 studied 7 patients, using the inert gas technique for measurement of MBF. They showed MBF in collateral-dependent segments of a totally occluded left anterior descending coronary artery with wall motion abnormalities had reduced MBF (>2 SD below the mean) compared with normal subjects with the same rate-pressure product (38±8 versus 70±13 mL/min per 100 g)69 70 and to total MBF (normal plus abnormal flow regions) in the same patients (38±8 versus 51±8; P=.02).69
| Impaired Wall Motion With Normal Blood Flow |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Complex protocols are very difficult to perform in patients, and Sun et al9 are to be congratulated for doing them successfully. Nevertheless, when analyzing the data and before making conclusions, we must keep limitations of the study in mind. In the study of Sun et al,6 these include (1) LV wall motion was evaluated subjectively by any one of three different investigators. The interobserver and intraobserver variability in assessing LV wall motion is not given. (2) The delay between measurement of resting MBF and assessment of LV wall motion in 6 patients averaged 12 days and ranged up to 22 days and thus, at the time of assessment of LV wall motion, resting MBF could have been different from that reported in their study. (3) The data on ß-adrenergic blockers is given, but no mention is made about coronary vasodilators, such as, nitrates or Ca2+ channelblocking agents. (4) Coronary arteriography was performed an average of 182 days before MBF studies and ranged up to 2 years before the PET studies. During the intervening period, 3 patients reported worsening of their symptoms. Thus, one cannot be sure of the extent and severity of coronary artery disease in the "abnormal remote" regions in all patients at the time of PET studies. (5) Of the 11 "abnormal remote" regions, 2 were supplied by vessels with 99% and 95% stenosis and 3 were supplied by vessels that were totally occluded; 7 of the 11 also had three-vessel disease. Coronary vasodilator reserve also was not normal in the "abnormal remote" region; with dobutamine, MBF increased by 68% in the normal remote regions and by only 31% in the abnormal remote regions. Thus, MBF may not have been normal in the regions labeled "abnormal remote," that is, those with abnormal LV function and "normal" MBF. (6) Of the 11 regions, 6 had no improvement with dobutamine, which suggests that the myocardium in the abnormal remote region may not have been viable in all patients. Thus, it is very difficult to come to any meaningful conclusion about the findings in this subgroup of patients. Therefore, it is questionable whether repetitive stunning or remodeled LV myocardium can be invoked as the cause of the findings; moreover, no data were presented for either occurrence in any of the 11 patients. Previously, Vanoverschelde et al67 inappropriately suggested repetitive stunning as a cause of the observed LV dysfunction in their study; subsequently, they acknowledged that "we agree that we have not yet proven that repeated stunning actually occurred in these patients."71 These comments should not be assumed to indicate that such a subgroup of patients does not exist; these comments are meant to emphasize that the data presented do not allow such conclusions to be made. However, Sun and coworkers9 are to be commended for presenting complete data on each patient, because such a detailed presentation allows a critical review and proper evaluation of this complex issue.
Summary
The study of Sun and coworkers is important because (1) it provides additional data that HM has an inotropic and an attenuated coronary vasodilator reserve. They also provided data that support the conclusion that with dobutamine, the improvement of abnormal LV wall motion is real in many patients. (2) It emphasizes the possibility of a deleterious effect (infarction) of dobutamine in HM and thus the need for appropriate caution during its use. (3) It provides additional data that confirm that areas of perfusion-metabolism mismatch on PET imaging (HM) are associated with a reduced MBF at rest.
However, their conclusions about areas of LV dysfunction with "normal" MBF in coronary artery disease are problematic; therefore, one must be extremely cautious about these conclusions on the basis of the data that are presented.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Rahimtoola SH. A perspective on the three multicenter randomized clinical trials of coronary bypass surgery for chronic stable angina. Circulation. 1985;72(suppl V):V-123-V-135.
3. Rahimtoola SH. The hibernating myocardium. Am Heart J. 1989;117:211-221.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Hearse JD. Myocardial ischemia: can we agree on a definition for the 21st century? Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:1737-1744.
5.
Ross J Jr. Myocardial perfusion-contraction matching: implications for coronary heart disease and hibernation. Circulation. 1991;83:1076-1083.
6. Marzullo P, Parodi O, Sambuceti G, Giorgetti A, Picano E, Gimelli A, Salvadori P, L'Abbatte A. Residual coronary reserve identifies segmental viability in patients with wall motion abnormalities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:342-350.[Abstract]
7.
Shivalkar B, Maes A, Borgers M, Ausma J, Scheys I, Nuyts J, Mortelmans L, Flameng W. Only hibernating myocardium shows early recovery after coronary revascularization. Circulation. 1996;94:308-315.
8. Braunwald E, Rutherford JD. Reversible ischemic left ventricular dysfunction: evidence for the `hibernating myocardium.' J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8:1467-1470.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Sun KT, Czernin J, Krirokapich J, Lau Y-K, Bottcher M, Maurer G, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Effects of dobutamine stimulation on myocardial blood flow, glucose metabolism and wall motion in normal and dysfunctional myocardium. Circulation. 1996;94:3146-3154.
10. Hinnen ML, Kremkau EL, Kloster FE, Rosch J. Influence of isoproterenol on left ventricular function in coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1972;46(suppl II):II-46. Abstract.
11. Horn HR, Teicholz LE, Cohn PF, Herman MV, Gorlin R. Augmentation of left ventricular contraction pattern in coronary artery disease by an inotropic catecholamine: the epinephrine ventriculogram. Circulation. 1972;46(suppl II):II-22. Abstract.
12.
Horn HR, Teicholz LE, Cohn PF, Herman MV, Gorlin R. Augmentation of left ventricular contraction pattern in coronary artery disease by an inotropic catecholamine: the epinephrine ventriculogram. Circulation. 1974;49:1063-1071.
13. Popio KA, Gorlin R, Bechtel D, Levine JA. Postextrasystolic potentiation as a predictor of potential myocardial viability: preoperative analyses compared with studies after coronary bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol. 1977;39:944-953.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Dyke SH, Cohn PF, Gorlin R, Sonnenblick EJ. Detection of residual myocardial function in coronary artery disease using post-extrasystolic potentiation. Circulation. 1974;50:694-699.
15.
Cohn PF, Gorlin R, Harmann MV, Sonnenblick EH, Horn HR, Cohn LH, Collins JJ Jr. Relation between contractile reserve and prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and a depressed ejection fraction. Circulation. 1975;51:414-420.
16.
Arai AE, Pantely GA, Anselone CG, Bristow J, Bristow JD. Active downregulation of myocardial energy requirements during prolonged moderate ischemia in swine. Circ Res. 1991;69:1458-1469.
17.
Schulz R, Guth BD, Pieper K, Martin C, Heusch G. Recruitment of an inotropic reserve in moderately ischemic myocardium at the expense of metabolic recovery: a model of short-term hibernation. Circ Res. 1992;70:1282-1295.
18.
Schulz R, Rose J, Martin C, Brodde OE, Heusch G. Development of short-term myocardial hibernation: its limitation by the severity of ischemia and inotropic stimulation. Circulation. 1993;88:684-695.
19.
Heusch G, Rose J, Skyschally A, Post H, Schulz R. Calcium responsiveness in regional myocardial short-term hibernation and stunning in the in situ porcine heart: inotropic responses to postextrasystolic potentiation and intracoronary calcium. Circulation. 1996;93:1556-1566.
20. Mills I, Fallon JT, Wrenn D, Sasken HF, Gray W, Bier J, Levine D, Berman S, Gibson M, Gerwitz H. Adaptive responses of the coronary circulation and myocardium to chronic reduction in perfusion pressure and flow. Am J Physiol. 1994;266(Heart Circ Physiol. 35):H447-H457.
21. Gewitz H. Myocardial hibernation: unresolved physiological and clinical issues. Basic Res Cardiol. 1995;90:32-34.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Pierard LA, DeLandsheere CM, Berthe C, Rigo P, Kulbertus HE. Identification of viable myocardium by echocardiography during dobutamine infusion in patients with myocardial infarction after thrombolytic therapy: comparison with positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:1021-1031.[Abstract]
23. Barilla F, Gheorghiade M, Alam M, Khaja F, Golstein S. Low-dose dobutamine in patients with acute myocardial infarction identifies viable but not contractile myocardium and predicts the magnitude of improvement in wall motion abnormalities in response to coronary revascularization. Am Heart J. 1991;122:1522-1531.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Smart SC, Sawada S, Ryan T, Segar D, Atherton L, Berkovitz K, Bourdillon PD, Feigenbaum H. Low-dose dobutamine echocardiography detects reversible dysfunction after thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1993;88:405-415.
25.
Cigarroa CG, deFilippi CR, Brickner ME, Alvarez LG, Wait MA, Grayburn PA. Dobutamine stress echocardiography identifies hibernating myocardium and predicts recovery of left ventricular function after coronary revascularization. Circulation. 1993;88:430-436.
26.
Beleslin BD, Ostojic M, Stepanovic J, Djordjevic-Dikic A, Stojkovic S, Nedeljkovic M, Stankovic G, Petrasinovic Z, Gojkovic L, Vasiljevic-Pokrajcic Z, Nedeljkovic S. Stress echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia: head-to-head comparison of exercise, dobutamine, and dipyridamole tests. Circulation. 1994;90:1168-1176.
27.
Afridi I, Kleinman NS, Raizner AE, Zoghbi WA. Dobutamine echocardiography in myocardial hibernation. Circulation. 1995;91:663-670.
28. Afridi I, Kleinman NS, Raizer AE, Zoghbi WA. Dobutamine echocardiography in myocardial hibernation: optimal dose and accuracy in predicting recovery of ventricular function after coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1995;91:663-670.
29.
Panza JA, Dilsizian V, Laurienzo JM, Curiel RV, Katsiyiannis PT. Relation between thallium uptake and contractile response to dobutamine. Circulation. 1995;91:990-998.
30.
Perrone-Filardi P, Pace L, Prastaro M, Piscione F, Betocchi S, Squame F, Vezzuto P, Soricelli A, Indolfi C, Salvatore M, Chiariello M. Dobutamine echocardiography predicts improvement of hypoperfused dysfunctional myocardium after revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1995;91:2556-2565.
31.
Arnese M, Cornel JH, Salustri A, Maat PWM, Elhendy A, Beijs AEM, Ten Cate FJ, Keane D, Balk AHMM, Roelandt JRTC, Fioretti PM. Prediction of improvement of regional left ventricular function after surgical revascularization. Circulation. 1995;91:2748-2752.
32.
Baer FM, Voth E, Schneider CA, Theissen P, Schicha H, Sechtem U. Comparison of low-dose dobutaminegradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography with [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1995;91:1006-1015.
33. Vanoverschelde JLJ, Gerber BL, D'Hondt A, Kock MD, Dion R, Wijns W, Melin JA. Preoperative selection of patients with severely impaired left ventricular function for coronary revascularization. Circulation. 1995;92(suppl II):II-37-II-44.
34. Previtali M, Poli A, Lanzarini L, Fetiveau R, Mussini A, Ferrario M. Dobutamine stress echocardiography for assessment of myocardial viability and ischemia in acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:124G-130G.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. LaCanna G, Alfieri O, Giubbini R, Gargano M, Ferrari R, Visioli O. Echocardiography during infusion of dobutamine for identification of reversible dysfunction in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:617-626.[Abstract]
36. Chan RKM, Lee KJ, Calafiore P, Berlangieri SU, McKay WJ, Tonkin AM. Comparison of dobutamine echocardiography and positron emission tomography in patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1601-1607.[Abstract]
37. Kaul S. Response of dysfunctional myocardium to dobutamine: `the eyes see what the mind knows.' J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1608-1611.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. DeKock M, Dion R, Wijns W, Melin JA. Head-to-head comparison of exercise-redistribution-reinjection thallium single-photon emission computed tomography and low dose dobutamine echocardiography for prediction of reversibility of chronic left ventricular ischemic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:432-442.[Abstract]
39. Dilsizian V. Myocardial viability: contractile reserve or cell membrane integrity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:443-446.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Armstrong WF. `Hibernating' myocardium: asleep or part dead? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:530-535.[Abstract]
41. Sambuceti G, Parodi O, Giorgetti A, Salvadori P, Marzilli M, Dabizzi P, Marzullo P, Neglia D, L'Abbatte A. Microvascular dysfunction in collateral-dependent myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:615-623.[Abstract]
42.
Chen C, Chen L, Fallon JT, Ma L, Li L, Bow L, Knibbs D, McKay R, Gillam LD, Waters DD. Functional and structural alterations with 24-hour myocardial hibernation and recovery after reperfusion: a pig model of myocardial hibernation. Circulation. 1996;94:507-516.
43.
Bonow RO. Identification of viable myocardium. Circulation. 1996;94:2674-2680. Editorial.
44. Flameng W, Suy R, Schwarz F, Borgers M, Piessens J, Thone F, Van Ermen H, Degust H. Ultrastructural correlates of left ventricular contraction abnormalities in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: determinations of reversible segmental asynergy postrevascularization surgery. Am Heart J. 1981;102:846-857.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Maes A, Flameng W, Nuyts J, Borgers M, Shivalkar B, Ausma J, Bormans G, Schiepers C, DeRoo M, Mortelmans L. Histological alternations in chronically hypoperfused myocardium. Circulation. 1994;90:735-745.
46.
Depre C, Vanoverschelde JLJ, Melin J, Borgers M, Bol A, Ausma J, Dion R, Wijns W. Structural and metabolic correlates of the reversibility of chronic left ventricular ischemic dysfunction in humans. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H1265-H1275.
47. Borgers M, Thone F, Wouters L, Ausina J, Shivalkar B, Flameng W. Structural correlates of regional myocardial dysfunction in patients with critical coronary artery stenosis: chronic hibernation? Cardiovasc Pathol. 1993;2:237-245.
48. Ausma J, Schaart G, Thone F, Shivalkar B, Flameng W, Depre C, Vanoverschelde JL, Ramackers F, Borgers M. Chronic ischemic viable myocardium in man: aspects of dedifferentiation. Cardiovasc Pathol. 1995;4:29-37.
49. Schwarz ER, Schaper J, von Dahl J, Altehoefer C, Grohmann B, Schoendube F, Sheehan FH, Uebis R, Buell U, Messmer BJ, Schaper W, Hanrath P. Myocyte degeneration and cell death in hibernating human myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1577-1585.[Abstract]
50. Mills I, Fallon JT, Wrenn D, Sasken H, Gray W, Bier J, Levine D, Berman S, Gilson M, Gewirtz H. Adaptive responses of coronary circulation and myocardium to chronic reduction in perfusion pressure and flow. Am J Physiol. 1994;266(Heart Circ Physiol. 35):H447-H457.
51.
Willerson JT, Hutton I, Watson JT, Platt MR, Templeton GH. Influence of dobutamine on regional myocardial blood flow and ventricular performance during acute and chronic myocardial ischemia in dogs. Circulation. 1976;53:828-833.
52.
Heusch G, Schulz R. Myocardial hibernation: adaptation to ischaemia. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:824-828.
53.
Chen C, Li L, Chen LL, Prada JV, Chen MH, Fallon JT, Weyman AE, Waters D, Gillam L. Incremental doses of dobutamine induce a biphasic response in dysfunctional left ventricular regions subtending coronary stenoses. Circulation. 1995;92:756-766.
54. Pellikka PA, Roger VL, Oh JK, Miller FA, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Stress echocardiography, II: dobutamine stress echocardiography: techniques, implementation, clinical applications, and correlations. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70:16-27.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Nagueh SF, Zoghbi WA. Stress echocardiography for the assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability. Curr Probl Cardiol. 1996;21:445-520.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56.
Yamamato Y, de Silva R, Rhodes CG, Araujo LI, Lida H, Recharia E, Nihoyannopoulos P, Hackett D, Galassi AR, Taylor CJV, Lammertsma AA, Jones T, Maseri A. A new strategy for the assessment of viable myocardium and regional myocardial blood flow using 15O-water and dynamic positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1992;86:167-178.
57. Perrone-Filardi P, Bacharach SL, Dilsizian V, Marin-Neto JA, Maurea S, Arrighi JA, Bonow RO. Clinical significance of reduced regional myocardial glucose uptake in regions with normal blood flow in patients with chronic artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:608-616.[Abstract]
58.
Nitzche EU, Choi Y, Czermin J, Hoh CK, Huang S-C, Schelbert HR. Noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow in humans: a direct comparison of the [13N] ammonia and the [15O] water techniques. Circulation. 1996;93:2000-2006.
59.
Czernin J, Muller P, Chan S, Brunken RC, Porenta G, Krivokapich J, Chen K, Chan A, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Influence of age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation. 1993;88:62-69.
60. Gewitz H, Fischman AJ, Abraham S, Gilson M, Strauss HW, Alpert NM. Positron emission tomographic measurements of absolute regional myocardial blood flow permits identification of nonviable myocardium in patients with chronic myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:851-859.[Abstract]
61.
Muzik O, Beanlands R, Wolfe E, Hutchins GD, Schwaiger M. Automated region definition for cardiac nitrogen-13-ammonia PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:336-344.
62.
Kuhle WG, Porenta G, Huang S-C, Buxton D, Gambhir SV, Hansen H, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and reoriented dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging. Circulation. 1992;86:1004-1017.
63.
Gallagher KP, Matsuzaki M, Koziol JA, Kemper WS, Ross J Jr. Regional myocardial perfusion and wall thickening during ischemia in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol. 1984;247:H727-H738.
64.
Vatner SF. Correlation between acute reductions in myocardial blood flow and function in conscious dogs. Circ Res. 1980;47:201-207.
65.
Pantely GA, Malone SA, Rhen WS, Anselone CG, Arai A, Bristow J, Bristow JD. Regeneration of myocardial phosphocreatine in pigs despite continued moderate ischemia. Circ Res. 1990;67:1481-1493.
66.
Vanoverschelde JLJ, Wijns W, Depre C, Essamri B, Heyndrickx GR, Borgers M, Bol A, Melin JA. Mechanisms of chronic regional postischemic dysfunction in humans. Circulation. 1993;87:1513-1523.
67. Rahimtoola SH. Chronic myocardial hibernation. Circulation. 1994;89:1097. Letter.
68.
Czernin J, Porenta G, Brunken R, Krivokapich J, Chen K, Bennett R, Hage A, Fung C, Tillisch J, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Regional blood flow, oxidative metabolism, and glucose utilization in patients with recent myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1993;88:884-895.
69. Arani DT, Greene DG, Bunnell IL, Smith GL, Klocke FJ. Reductions in coronary flow under resting conditions in collateral-dependent myocardium of patients with complete occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;3:668-674.[Abstract]
70.
Klocke FJ, Bunnell IL, Greene DG, Wittenberg SM, Visco JP. Average coronary blood flow per unit weight of left ventricle in patients with and without coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1974;50:547-559.
71.
Vanoverschelde JL. Chronic Myocardial Hibernation. Circulation. 1994;89:1907-1908. Reply.
72. Muzik O, Beanlands R, Wolfe E, Hutchins GD, Schwaiger M. Automated region definition for cardiac nitrogen-13-ammonia PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:336-344.
73.
Czernin J, Sun K, Brunken R, Bottcher M, Phelps M, Schelbert H. Effect of acute and long-term smoking on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation. 1995;91:2891-2897.
74. Chan SY, Brunken RC, Czernin J, Porenta G, Kuhle W, Krivokapich J, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Comparison of maximal myocardial blood flow during adenosine infusion with that of intravenous dipyridamole in normal men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:979-985.[Abstract]
75. Sambuceti G, Parodi O, Marcassa C, Neglia D, Salvadori P, Giorgetti A, Bellina RC, DiSacco S, Nista N, Marzullo P, Testa R, L'Abbatte A. Alteration in regulation of myocardial blood flow in one-vessel coronary artery disease determined by positron emission tomography. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:538-543.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
76. Camici P, Chiriatti G, Lorenzoni R, Bellina RC, Gistri R, Italiani G, Parodi O, Salvadori PA, Nista N, Papi L, L'Abbate A. Coronary vasodilation is impaired in both hypertrophied and nonhypertrophied myocardium of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a study with nitrogen-13 ammonia and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:879-886.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. F. Rodrigues de Avila, J. L. Fernandes, C. E. Rochitte, G. G. Cerri, and J. P. Filho Perfusion Impairment in Patients with Normal-appearing Coronary Arteries: Identification with Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Radiology, December 21, 2005; (2005) 2382041697. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Yan, D. E. Vatner, S.-J. Kim, H. Ge, M. Masurekar, W. H. Massover, G. Yang, Y. Matsui, J. Sadoshima, and S. F. Vatner Autophagy in chronically ischemic myocardium PNAS, September 27, 2005; 102(39): 13807 - 13812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Heusch, R. Schulz, and S. H. Rahimtoola Myocardial hibernation: a delicate balance Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H984 - H999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Alamanni, A Parolari, A Repossini, E Doria, F Bortone, J Campolo, M Pepi, E Sisillo, M Naliato, R Bigi, et al. Coronary blood flow, metabolism, and function in dysfunctional viable myocardium before and early after surgical revascularisation Heart, November 1, 2004; 90(11): 1291 - 1298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Biswas, G. C. Hughes, J. E. Scarborough, P. W. Domkowski, L. Diodato, M. L. Smith, C. Landolfo, J. E. Lowe, B. H. Annex, and K. P. Landolfo Intramyocardial and intracoronary basic fibroblast growth factor in porcine hibernating myocardium: A comparative study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2004; 127(1): 34 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Bianco, E. Tadamura, M. Yamamuro, S. Kubo, M. Mamede, and R. Sciagra Absolute Quantitation of Myocardial Blood Flow After Nitroglycerin and Ischemic Cardiomyopathy with a Low Ejection Fraction J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1872 - 1873. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. Kim, A. Peppas, S.-K. Hong, G. Yang, Y. Huang, G. Diaz, J. Sadoshima, D. E. Vatner, and S. F. Vatner Persistent Stunning Induces Myocardial Hibernation and Protection: Flow/Function and Metabolic Mechanisms Circ. Res., June 13, 2003; 92(11): 1233 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. I.W. Galasko and A. Lahiri The non-invasive assessment of hibernating myocardium in ischaemic cardiomyopathy--a myriad of techniques Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2003; 5(3): 217 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Zaglavara, R Haaverstad, B Cumberledge, T Irvine, H Karvounis, G Parharidis, G Louridas, and A Kenny Dobutamine stress echocardiography for the detection of myocardial viability in patients with left ventricular dysfunction taking {beta} blockers: accuracy and optimal dose Heart, April 1, 2002; 87(4): 329 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Hughes, C. K. Landolfo, B. Yin, T. R. DeGrado, R. E. Coleman, K. P. Landolfo, and J. E. Lowe Is chronically dysfunctional yet viable myocardium distal to a severe coronary stenosis hypoperfused? Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 72(1): 163 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Udelson Testing our tests: surrogate end points versus driving patient management and outcomes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 89 - 92. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wiggers, M. Noreng, P. K. Paulsen, M. Bottcher, H. Egeblad, T. T. Nielsen, and H. E. Botker Energy stores and metabolites in chronic reversibly and irreversibly dysfunctional myocardium in humans J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 100 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tawakol, H. A. Skopicki, S. A. Abraham, N. M. Alpert, A. J. Fischman, M. H. Picard, and H. Gewirtz Evidence of reduced resting blood flow in viable myocardial regions with chronic asynergy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2000; 36(7): 2146 - 2153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Haas, N. Augustin, K. Holper, M. Wottke, C. Haehnel, S. Nekolla, H. Meisner, R.u. Lange, and M. Schwaiger Time course and extent of improvement of dysfunctioning myocardium in patients with coronary artery disease and severely depressed left ventricular function after revascularization: correlation with positron emission tomographic findings J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2000; 36(6): 1927 - 1934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. St. Louis, G. C. Hughes, A. P. Kypson, T. R. DeGrado, C. L. Donovan, R. E. Coleman, B. Yin, C. Steenbergen, K. P. Landolfo, and J. E. Lowe An experimental model of chronic myocardial hibernation Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2000; 69(5): 1351 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Morimoto, H. Tomoda, M. Yoshitake, N. Aoki, S. Handa, and Y. Suzuki Prediction of Coronary Artery Lesions in Unstable Angina by Iodine 123 Beta-Methyl Iodophenyl Pentadecanoic Acid (BMIPP), a Fatty Acid Analogue, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography at Rest Angiology, August 1, 1999; 50(8): 639 - 648. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Firoozan, K. Wei, A. Linka, D. Skyba, N. C. Goodman, and S. Kaul A canine model of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy: characterization of regional flow-function relations Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 1999; 276(2): H446 - H455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. HEUSCH Hibernating Myocardium Physiol Rev, October 1, 1998; 78(4): 1055 - 1085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Kudej, B. Ghaleh, N. Sato, Y.-T. Shen, S. P. Bishop, and S. F. Vatner Ineffective Perfusion-Contraction Matching in Conscious, Chronically Instrumented Pigs With an Extended Period of Coronary Stenosis Circ. Res., June 15, 1998; 82(11): 1199 - 1205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Kloner, R. Bolli, E. Marban, L. Reinlib, and E. Braunwald Medical and Cellular Implications of Stunning, Hibernation, and Preconditioning : An NHLBI Workshop Circulation, May 19, 1998; 97(18): 1848 - 1867. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Schulz, C. Kappeler, H. Coenen, A. Bockisch, and G. Heusch Positron Emission Tomography Analysis of [1-11C]Acetate Kinetics in Short-term Hibernating Myocardium Circulation, March 17, 1998; 97(10): 1009 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Udelson Steps Forward in the Assessment of Myocardial Viability in Left Ventricular Dysfunction Circulation, March 10, 1998; 97(9): 833 - 838. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |