(Circulation. 1996;94:2909-2914.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
the Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division (Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Coronary Care Unit), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, and the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
Correspondence to Campbell Rogers, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail cdrogers@bics.bwh.harvard.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Stainless steel stents were expanded in normal or previously denuded iliac arteries of New Zealand White rabbits. Stented arteries were harvested 15 minutes, 1 hour, 3 days, or 14 days later. En face staining of the luminal surfaces of stented arteries demonstrated that endothelial cell loss began immediately after stent expansion and was restricted to interstices between stent struts. Remnant endothelium adjacent to struts provided the foundation for complete endothelial regeneration of the stented segment within 3 days. Both early monocyte adhesion and later intimal macrophage accumulation were reduced >80% in nonballooned but stented arteries, in concert with a twofold reduction in intimal thickening after 14 days, compared with arteries completely denuded with a balloon before stent expansion.
Conclusions It is accepted that deep injury caused by balloon-expanded endovascular stents is a critical contributor to experimental stent-induced neointimal hyperplasia. Our data indicate that the degree of endothelial injury may also be an important component of vascular repair after stenting and an important consideration in stent and balloon design and use. The use of stents for primary endovascular intervention may allow partial retention of endothelium within treated arteries, thereby modulating vascular repair with less need for adjunctive pharmacological therapy.
Key Words: stents endothelium pathology restenosis arteriosclerosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical vascular interventions such as balloon angioplasty ablate the endothelial lining of diseased vessels,9 10 11 and it has been proposed that promoting rapid endothelial regrowth might favorably alter clinical vascular repair. Endovascular stents, although they are expanded on a balloon, separate the balloon from the luminal surface by the thickness of their struts. We wondered whether this might allow for arterial dilation without circumferential balloon-endothelium contact, retention of some native endothelium, and as a result, enhanced vascular healing. En face histological staining techniques revealed endothelial cell loss within minutes of stent expansion in arteries without previous balloon injury but that in contrast to arteries subjected to balloon angioplasty alone, a substantial amount of endothelium remained after stenting and that this remnant endothelium repopulated the stented arterial surface within 3 days. Such rapid reendothelialization resulted in near abolition of early inflammatory cell recruitment and a twofold reduction in later intimal thickening.
Our data demonstrate that endovascular stents may permit arterial dilation without complete endothelial obliteration, and as a result, muted hyperplastic sequelae. Current clinical practice for stent placement often includes denuding interventions such as arterial predilation with a bare balloon before stent expansion. This practice may need to be reconsidered whenever clinically practical. Moreover, in addition to a focus on pharmacological means of modulating the response to vascular injury, further examination of clinically practical methods of reducing endothelial and vessel wall injury may be warranted. Alternative protocols might therefore limit or eliminate dilation of the artery before stent implantation rather than requiring genetically engineered endothelial cellseeded stents to reendothelialize injured vessels.5 6 7 Novel stent designs might facilitate implantation without balloon predilation and focus on means of speeding endogenous endothelial regrowth.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5 mg·kg-1·d-1. Endovascular stents were placed in both external iliac arteries as previously described.12 13 Under anesthesia with ketamine (Aveco Co, 35 mg/kg IM) and sodium pentobarbital (Nembutal, Abbott Laboratories, 4 mg/kg IV), both femoral arteries were exposed and ligated. A stainless steel stent (Multi-Link, Advanced Cardiovascular Systems) mounted coaxially on a 3-mm angioplasty balloon was passed retrogradely via arteriotomy into each iliac artery and expanded with a 15-second inflation at a pressure of 8 atm. Iliac arteries for rabbits of this size range from 2.5 to 2.75 mm in diameter, yielding a balloon/stent-to-artery ratio of 1.1:1 to 1.2:1.12 13 To study the importance of endothelial denudation that accompanies stent expansion, some stents were placed in normal arteries and others were placed after the iliac arterial endothelium had been removed with a 3F balloon embolectomy catheter (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Edwards Division). The embolectomy catheter was passed via arteriotomy retrogradely into the abdominal aorta and withdrawn through the iliac artery in the inflated state three times, a procedure known to completely remove the endothelial lining.1 2 4 8 Arteries subjected only to balloon angioplasty with the same 3-mm balloons as used for stent deployment were also examined. All animals received a single intravenous bolus of standard anticoagulant heparin (100 U/kg, Elkin-Sinn Inc) at the time of surgery to limit stent thrombosis.
Endothelial Injury and Regeneration
To examine stent-induced endothelial denudation and subsequent regrowth, arteries were harvested 15 minutes (n=3), 60 minutes (n=3), or 3 days (n=4) after stent expansion or 60 minutes after balloon angioplasty (n=3). En face staining was performed with a modified Hautchen preparation.14 This technique is superior to other means of examining endothelial integrity, including scanning electron microscopy or the injection of tracer dyes such as Evans Blue, because it maintains luminal surface integrity with high fidelity and with the broadest view of the arterial surface. Precise quantitative assessment can be made at all magnifications. After anesthesia with intravenous sodium pentobarbital, inferior vena caval exsanguination, and perfusion with Ringer's lactate solution via left ventricular puncture, the iliac arteries were perfused in situ via the abdominal aorta with modified Ito-Karnovsky fixative (200 mL), AgNO3 (100 mg in 200 mL for 1 minute), and bromides (COBr2, 3.0 g, and NH4Br, 1.0 g, in 200 mL dH2O for 1 minute). Both iliac arteries were excised, rinsed in modified Ito-Karnovsky fixative on ice for 60 minutes, and placed in 0.1 mol/L NaPO4 buffer. Arteries were opened longitudinally and the stents lifted gently off the luminal surface so as not to disturb the adjacent structures. Unstained areas underlying stent struts were no wider than the stent struts themselves, attesting to the power of this technique in providing in situ fixation with full preservation of morphological and spatial detail of the intact luminal surface. The arteries were then pinned to dental wax, dehydrated, and transferred to glass slides. The area of endothelial denudation in the stented or angioplastied portion was quantified by computer-assisted digital planimetry.
Cellular Responses
In another series of experiments, the effects of remnant endothelium on cellular responses within the injured vessel wall were assessed in arteries with or without prestent balloon denudation harvested 3 days (n=4 each) or 14 days (n=6 or n=4, respectively) after stent implantation. After euthanatization and perfusion with Ringer's lactate solution as described above, both iliac arteries, as well as a section of spleen (as a positive control tissue for immunohistochemical staining), were excised and fixed in Carnoy's solution (60% methanol, 30% chloroform, 10% glacial acetic acid). Proximal and distal stent ends were identified and marked and the stented arterial segments embedded with a new methyl methacrylate formulation15 and cut with a tungsten carbide knife (Delaware Diamond Knives) on an LKB Historange microtome. Cross sections 5 µm thick were taken from three sites along each stent-implanted artery, including each end and the middle. To minimize sampling error, the three arterial sites along each stent were analyzed morphometrically and the results averaged.
Tissue and cell structures were examined in histological sections by staining with Verhoeff's elastic tissue stain, hematoxylin-eosin, or modified Russell-Movat pentachrome stain. Neointimal and medial cross-sectional areas and thicknesses were quantified in elastin-stained sections by computer-assisted digital planimetry. The extent of deep arterial injury caused by each stent strut was quantified histologically by the method of Schwartz et al.16 Each stent strut in an arterial cross section was graded as to the extent of its vessel wall disruption: 0 for no disruption of the internal elastic lamina, 1 for disruption of the internal elastic lamina, 2 for laceration of the tunica media, and 3 for disruption of the external elastic lamina. An overall injury score for each cross section was calculated by averaging the individual scores for all struts within that section. The rigid scaffolding provided to the artery by the stent provided a taut luminal surface on which to examine adherent cells postmortem. Cells adherent to the luminal surface were examined individually under x600 magnification, their nuclear morphology was classified as polymorphonuclear or monocytic, and their numbers were counted.
Specific cell types were identified by standard immunohistochemical techniques based on previously published methods15 17 with antibodies to rabbit macrophages (monoclonal mouse RAM 11 IgG, DAKO) or endothelial cells (polyclonal goat antihuman factor VIII, ICN Biomedicals). Methacrylate-embedded sections were deplasticized with xylenes and ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (Sigma) as previously reported.15 Sections were then rehydrated, digested with 0.1% trypsin (for RAM 11 staining only), quenched, and blocked with 10% serum. Incubation was performed with primary antibody diluted in PBS at 1.2 µg/mL IgG concentration for RAM 11 or 5.8 mg/L protein concentration for antifactor VIII. For each set of immunohistochemically stained slides, sections of spleen were used as positive controls and nonspecific IgGs were used at the same concentrations as the primary antibodies for negative controls. Sections were then rinsed and incubated with species-appropriate biotinylated secondary antibodies followed by another rinse. Labeling was done with avidin-biotin-peroxidase or avidin-biotinalkaline phosphatase kits (Vectastain ABC Elite, Vector) with substrates 3,3-diaminobenzidine (Sigma) and alkaline phosphatase substrate kit I (Vector) kits, respectively. Total cell density for a cross section from the midportion of each stented segment was calculated, and the number of cells identified as macrophages by RAM 11 staining was counted and expressed as a percentage of total cells.
Statistics
All data are presented as the mean±SD. Comparisons between groups used ANOVA followed by Scheffe's procedure as a post hoc test. Values of P<.05 were considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Biological Effects of Remnant Endothelium
The biological effects of remnant endothelium after stent expansion were examined at times corresponding to times of peak monocyte recruitment (3 days) and peak intimal thickening (14 days) in this model.18 Stents were expanded in arteries with either intact or previously denuded endothelium. Tissue and cellular reactions, including neointimal area and monocyte/macrophage and endothelial cell presence, were evaluated in histological cross sections.
Three days after stent placement in denuded arteries, a monolayer of inflammatory cells was observed adherent to the luminal surface (175±58 cells per section, Figs 2A
and 3A19 ). The luminal accumulation of mural thrombosis and inflammatory cell presence measured 1.41±0.24 mm2 at this time.19 Stent expansion in nondenuded arteries resulted in 83% fewer adherent monocytes after 3 days (30±6 cells per section, P<.003 compared with denuded stented arteries; Figs 2B and 3A![]()
) and 81% less intimal area (0.27±0.02 mm2, P<.0001 compared with denuded stented arteries). The luminal surface of stented nondenuded arteries was lined after 3 days with a monolayer of cells (Figs 1F and 2B![]()
), specifically identified by immunohistochemical staining for factor VIII as endothelial cells (Fig 2C
).
|
|
Fourteen days after stenting, an organized neointima had replaced the initial inflammatory cellrich mural thrombus (Fig 2D
). Arteries denuded of endothelium before stent placement accrued a neointima measuring 0.91±0.19 mm2.19 Monocytes were still observed adherent to the surface (28±14 cells per section19 ). Within the intima, RAM 11 staining showed intensely labeled cells surrounding the stent struts (Fig 4
) as well as in interstrut regions (0.66±0.17% of cells19 ). Cells staining for factor VIII (endothelial cells) were not apparent. In contrast, when arteries receiving stents without initial balloon denudation were compared with denuded stented arteries, there was less intimal thickening (intimal area, 0.52±0.13 mm2, P<.02; Figs 2E and 5![]()
), there were fewer luminally adherent monocytes (7±2 cells per section, P<.02), there were fewer RAM 11positive macrophages within the intima (0.09±0.04% of cells, P<.0006, Fig 3B
), and there was an intact layer of factor VIIIpositive endothelial cells (Fig 2F
). There was no difference in medial area, stent diameter, or deep arterial injury between denuded and nondenuded groups at 3 or 14 days. For all antifactor VIII and RAM 11 staining protocols, control nonspecific IgG stained negatively, whereas spleen sections stained with primary antibodies stained positively.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast to denuding experimental models, clinical interventions induce deep vessel wall damage through stretching as well as endothelial injury through abrasion. Endovascular stents are unique among clinical devices in that they provide arterial dilation without circumferential contact of the device with the vascular endothelium. Our data demonstrate that stent struts limit contact of the expanding balloon with the underlying wall. In contrast to the total denudation that follows balloon angioplasty, balloon-expanded stents left areas of endothelium intact. Endothelial cell loss was apparent within the interstices of the stent 15 minutes after expansion, and the area of denudation encompassed 41% of the luminal surface after 1 hour. Within 3 days, however, the surface of the stented artery had become completely relined with endothelial cells. The difference between balloon- and stent-induced damage allowed study of endothelial injury and regrowth as contributing factors in the pathogenesis of neointimal hyperplasia.
In denuded arteries, endothelial regrowth begins as normal endothelial cells adjacent to the injured segment2 21 divide and migrate to reline the arterial surface. When a stent is placed without antecedent balloon denudation, sufficient endothelium remains within the stented segment to allow repopulation with a much reduced requirement for endothelial proliferation and migration. In several animal models, stent placement within denuded arteries produces an intimal response rich in macrophages18 19 22 and severalfold greater than that seen after balloon injury alone.12 13 23 Our data show that these biological parameters can be dramatically muted by remnant endothelium, presumably because of rapid regeneration of an intact endothelial monolayer. Monocyte recruitment and intimal area after 3 days were reduced by 83% and 81%, respectively; macrophage presence within the intima after 14 days by 89%; and neointimal hyperplasia after 14 days by 43%.
The mechanism of endothelial injury during stent expansion is not clear. Although it was expected that stent struts would themselves scrape the endothelial layer during expansion, the pattern of endothelial loss observed was not consistent with this mechanism. On the contrary, endothelial injury was most severe in stent interstices and was least severe adjacent to struts. Contributing factors to endothelial injury during stent expansion may include balloon-vessel contact between struts; pressure imposed by blood confined to the closed space between balloon, stent struts, and vessel wall during expansion; inhomogeneous circumferential strain applied to the vessel wall during dilation; or acute alterations in flow. Current clinical practice of coronary stent implantation includes high-pressure stent expansion with noncompliant balloons at pressures >14 to 16 atm. Furthermore, adjunctive pharmacological regimens accompanying stent use are evolving and may have unanticipated effects on vascular wall cellular responses. The reproducible localization of endothelial cell loss to stent interstices also implies that factors such as balloon pressure and compliance, strut thickness and configuration, speed of inflation, and vessel oversizing may all be important determinants of endothelial loss. Optimizing these parameters may allow less injurious stent expansion with correspondingly limited vascular responses.
Effects of Endothelial Injury and Repair
Endothelial dysfunction is one of the earliest markers of atherosclerosis,20 and the effectiveness of intact endothelium at inhibiting intimal thickening has been demonstrated in several experimental models.2 3 4 Endothelial cell products reduce vessel wall permeability to platelet-derived growth mediators and other circulating factors. They inhibit thrombosis, platelet adhesion, and vascular smooth muscle cell growth.24 They also bind and inactivate mitogens.25 26 Aside from classic experiments identifying heparan sulfate proteoglycan as a potent compound in such growth regulation, recent evidence also suggests that nitric oxide may participate in the control of vascular healing after injury.27 If so, production of nitric oxide by regenerating endothelial cells might contribute to the modulation of neointimal hyperplasia observed in this model.
Macrophage presence within the intima in stented rabbit iliac arteries has been shown to be closely related to the appearance of intimal thickening.13 18 19 In denuded stented arteries, monocyte recruitment begins early and peaks within the first week.19 Our data now demonstrate that this endothelium-independent monocyte adhesion was virtually abolished by an intact endothelial monolayer. Although mechanisms underlying the recruitment and endothelium-independent binding of monocytes to stent-injured arteries are not clear, the inhibition of monocyte recruitment and infiltration by early endothelial regrowth may be an important part of the modulation of neointimal hyperplasia in this model.
Study Limitations
Our data support the beneficial effects of endothelial regrowth on vascular repair in nonatherosclerotic vessels and introduce a potential means for endothelial preservation in clinical arterial interventions. Direct extrapolation from biological effects of rapid endothelial restoration in experimental models to clinical settings is limited by uncertainty of endothelial cell presence and function in atherosclerotic vessels. Although there is histological evidence of endothelial cell presence within diseased vessels,9 11 further examination of regenerated endothelial cell biological activity will be essential to directing these observations toward clinical utility. Furthermore, direct extrapolation from stent expansion in normal arteries to primary clinical stenting in diseased arteries can only be made with caution. Difficulty in positioning stent-bearing balloon catheters across severe arterial stenoses may necessitate novel stent and catheter designs that will obviate the need for arterial predilation before stent expansion.
Implications
The burgeoning use and possibly reduced restenosis rates of endovascular coronary stents28 29 mandate better understanding of the effects of endovascular implants on vascular wall homeostasis. This study has demonstrated the different vascular responses to partial versus complete endothelial denudation caused by balloon-expanded stents. The study also shows that deep vascular injury is not the only mechanism by which stent implantation can provoke intimal thickening.16
Current clinical stent use often includes denuding interventions such as coronary imaging with an ultrasound catheter or predilation with a balloon before stent deployment. Our data allow the hypothesis that if some endothelium is present in atherosclerotic vessels,9 11 stents used without balloon predilation may provide a means for dilating arteries while avoiding complete endothelial ablation. Previous attempts have been made to reintroduce into injured vessels genetically engineered endothelial cells attached to stent struts.5 6 7 Alternative approaches may be (1) to use stents in a manner so as to minimize endothelial injury and (2) to design stents and catheters to enable primary stent placement without predilation and to facilitate endogenous endothelial regrowth.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received March 26, 1996; revision received June 18, 1996; accepted July 2, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Ormiston, E. Mahmud, M. A. Turco, J. J. Popma, N. Weissman, L. A. Cannon, T. Mann, M. J. Lucca, S.-T. Lim, J. J. Hall, et al. Direct Stenting With the TAXUS Liberte Drug-Eluting Stent: Results From the TAXUS ATLAS DIRECT STENT Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 150 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Cuisset, M. Hamilos, N. Melikian, E. Wyffels, J. Sarma, G. Sarno, E. Barbato, J. Bartunek, W. Wijns, and B. De Bruyne Direct stenting for stable angina pectoris is associated with reduced periprocedural microcirculatory injury compared with stenting after pre-dilation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 18, 2008; 51(11): 1060 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Ellis, A. Colombo, E. Grube, J. Popma, J. Koglin, K. D. Dawkins, and G. W. Stone Incidence, Timing, and Correlates of Stent Thrombosis With the Polymeric Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Stent: A TAXUS II, IV, V, and VI Meta-Analysis of 3,445 Patients Followed for Up to 3 Years J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 13, 2007; 49(10): 1043 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Inoue, M. Sata, Y. Hikichi, R. Sohma, D. Fukuda, T. Uchida, M. Shimizu, H. Komoda, and K. Node Mobilization of CD34-Positive Bone Marrow-Derived Cells After Coronary Stent Implantation: Impact on Restenosis Circulation, February 6, 2007; 115(5): 553 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Pislaru, A. Harbuzariu, R. Gulati, T. Witt, N. P. Sandhu, R. D. Simari, and G. S. Sandhu Magnetically Targeted Endothelial Cell Localization in Stented Vessels J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 7, 2006; 48(9): 1839 - 1845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ozdemir, A. T. Sezgin, I. Barutcu, E. Topal, H. Gullu, and N. Acikgoz Comparison of Direct Stenting Versus Conventional Stent Implantation on Blood Flow in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Angiology, August 1, 2006; 57(4): 453 - 458. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rippstein, M. K. Black, M. Boivin, J. P. Veinot, X. Ma, Y.-X. Chen, P. Human, P. Zilla, and E. R. O'Brien Comparison of Processing and Sectioning Methodologies for Arteries Containing Metallic Stents J. Histochem. Cytochem., June 1, 2006; 54(6): 673 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. Weon, S.-G. Kang, J. W. Chung, Y. I. Kim, J. H. Park, and D. Y. Lee Technical feasibility and biocompatibility of a newly designed separating stent-graft in the normal canine aorta. Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1148 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wijns, S. Verheye, G. Manoharan, G. S. Werner, E. Grube, B. De Bruyne, J. Koolen, C. W. Hamm, A. Medina, J. W. Bech, et al. Angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and fractional flow reserve evaluation of direct stenting vs. conventional stenting using BeStent2 in a multicentre randomized trial Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2005; 26(18): 1852 - 1859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Luca, H. Suryapranata, R. Grimaldi, and M. Chiariello Coronary stenting and abciximab in primary angioplasty for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction QJM, September 1, 2005; 98(9): 633 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Methe, H. M. Nugent, A. Groothuis, P. Seifert, M. H. Sayegh, and E. R. Edelman Matrix Embedding Alters the Immune Response Against Endothelial Cells In Vitro and In Vivo Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-89 - I-95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Herzum, R Cosmeleata, and B Maisch Managing a complication after direct stenting: removal of a maldeployed stent with rotational atherectomy Heart, June 1, 2005; 91(6): e46 - e46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Costa and D. I. Simon Molecular Basis of Restenosis and Drug-Eluting Stents Circulation, May 3, 2005; 111(17): 2257 - 2273. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Okmen, N. Cam, A. Sanli, F. Yapici, H. Uyarel, M. Vural, and R. Ozturk Effects of Direct Stent Implantation and Conventional Stent Implantation on Minor Myocardial Injury Angiology, September 1, 2004; 55(5): 485 - 491. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Sousa, P. W. Serruys, and M. A. Costa New Frontiers in Cardiology: Drug-Eluting Stents: Part II Circulation, May 13, 2003; 107(18): 2383 - 2389. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Cheneau, M. C. John, J. Fournadjiev, R. C. Chan, H.-S. Kim, L. Leborgne, R. Pakala, H. Yazdi, A. E. Ajani, R. Virmani, et al. Time Course of Stent Endothelialization After Intravascular Radiation Therapy in Rabbit Iliac Arteries Circulation, April 29, 2003; 107(16): 2153 - 2158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Barbato, J. Marco, and W. Wijns Direct stenting Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2003; 24(5): 394 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.J.J IJsselmuiden, P.W Serruys, A Scholte, F Kiemeneij, T Slagboom, L.R v/d Wieken, G.J Tangelder, and G.J Laarman Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events: Six month results of a randomized trial Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2003; 24(5): 421 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Briguori, C. Sarais, P. Pagnotta, F. Liistro, M. Montorfano, A. Chieffo, F. Sgura, N. Corvaja, R. Albiero, G. Stankovic, et al. In-stent restenosis in small coronary arteries: Impact of strut thickness J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 7, 2002; 40(3): 403 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colombo Direct stenting: safe with advantages for the patient and for the doctor (less fluoroscopy and procedural time) Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2002; 23(8): 592 - 595. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Martinez-Elbal, J.M. Ruiz-Nodar, J. Zueco, J.R. Lopez-Minguez, J. Moreu, I. Calvo, J.A. Ramirez, M. Alonso, N. Vazquez, R. Lezaun, et al. Direct coronary stenting versus stenting with balloon pre-dilation: immediate and follow-up results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized study. The DISCO trial Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2002; 23(8): 633 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Masuo, T. Terada, G. Walker, M. Tsuura, H. Matsumoto, K. Tohya, M. Kimura, K. Nakai, and T. Itakura Study of the Patency of Small Arterial Branches after Stent Placement with an Experimental in Vivo Model AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2002; 23(4): 706 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S Conte, G. A VanMeter, L. M Akst, T. Clemons, M. Kashgarian, and J. R Bender Endothelial cell seeding influences lesion development following arterial injury in the cholesterol-fed rabbit Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2002; 53(2): 502 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Loubeyre, M.-C. Morice, T. Lefevre, J.-F. Piechaud, Y. Louvard, and P. Dumas A randomized comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2002; 39(1): 15 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |