(Circulation. 1996;93:853-856.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.
Correspondence to Carl W. White, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Box 508 UMHC, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail white001@maroon.tc.umn.edu.
Key Words: Editorials thrombolysis coronary disease angioplasty
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although widely used, the validity, reproducibility, and determinants of TIMI flow measurements have, unfortunately, received little attention. Most investigators, apparently convinced by the face validity of this measurement, spent little time worrying about the finer points of methodological detail or underlying mechanisms. These angiographic determinations were quickly applied to measure coronary velocity under a wide variety of other circumstances including after angioplasty and newer coronary interventional techniques.
This simple and convenient view of coronary flow after thrombolysis has now been shattered by the precise investigations of Gibson and colleagues,7 reported in this issue of Circulation. Working retrospectively with data from the TIMI 4 trial, these investigators developed a more precise method to assess coronary flow velocity from the angiogram. Using an angiographic frame counter and correcting for disparities in vessel length between the left anterior descending artery and the circumflex or right coronary artery, the investigators made several important observations.
First, the conventional visual classification of TIMI flow is greatly hampered by high interobserver variability. Second, even length-corrected TIMI frame counts show that angiographic coronary flow velocity varies substantially from vessel to vessel in the normal major coronary arteries. (Angiographic coronary flow velocity is slower in the left anterior descending than in the other two major epicardial arteries.) This vessel specificity in TIMI flow velocity underscores a fatal flaw in the usual relative comparison of flow velocity in the infarct-related artery to that seen in the noninfarct vessel. Only very prolonged velocities for circumflex-related infarctions will appear prolonged when compared with the TIMI flow in the adjacent left anterior descending artery, which under normal circumstances is slower than that in the circumflex artery. Consequently, a larger proportion of circumflex infarctions will appear to have TIMI 3 flow versus left anterior descending infarctions. This theoretical likelihood is confirmed by review of several small published series of infarcts in which TIMI flow was visually estimated.3 6 Additionally, since there is no comparison artery simultaneously injected at the time of right coronary angiography, a small prolongation of the flow velocity in this vessel probably would be difficult to detect. The data presented by Gibson et al7 thus show convincingly that visual estimates of TIMI flow, especially when performed in usual clinical settings, bear little relationship to the more precise corrected TIMI frame count at 90 minutes after thrombolysis.
Third, measurements of corrected TIMI flow show that even flow in noninfarct-related arteries at the time of acute infarction are mildly prolonged when compared with vessel-specific normal values. This small degree of flow prolongation seen in all noninfarct arteries 90 minutes after reperfusion subsequently normalized between 18 and 36 hours. These results have some similarity to previous provocative data of Uren et al8 from dipyridamole-augmented PET studies, which showed that the ability of the coronary resistance vessels in the remote region to dilate is significantly impaired even 1 week after infarction. This probably reflects a generalized increase in neurohormonal sympathetic activity that occurs acutely after infarction9 10 and results in an abnormal increase in microvascular resistance.
| Is Prolongation of Coronary Flow Velocity After Thrombolysis an Epicardial or Microvascular Problem? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ongoing work of Gibson et al14 using fluid dynamic modeling suggests that although at 90 minutes after thrombolysis, patients with TIMI 2 flow have a smaller minimum lesion diameter and percent stenosis than those with TIMI 3 flow, the lower coronary velocity results in a smaller transstenotic pressure drop across the epicardial stenosis and a higher microvascular resistance in TIMI 2 versus TIMI 3 patients. Taken together, these data implicate the microvasculature as the most important locus of prolonged TIMI flow.
Although a severe epicardial stenosis remaining after incomplete thrombolysis may constitute a small portion of this phenomenon, it is likely that the major component of this prolongation represents a form of the no-reflow phenomenon. Restoration of flow to a previously ischemic area is not always followed by homogenous reperfusion. After release of a coronary occlusion lasting more than 90 minutes in the dog, reactive hyperemia does not occur, reperfusion of the involved zone is heterogeneous, and average flow is much less than normal.15 Mechanisms contributing to this phenomenon are believed to include increases in vasomotor tone,16 capillary compression by swollen myocytes,15 direct capillary damage,17 and occlusion of capillaries by packed red cells, fibrin plugs, platelets, and white blood cells.18 Since the oxygen demands of the endothelium are low compared with myocytes and capillaries that are closest to the oxygen supply, capillaries are more resistant to the effects of ischemia.19 Signs of no reflow are greatest in the absence of collateral flow and in situations of greatest ischemia. Regional hypoperfusion (no reflow) can result after myocardial infarction as the result of microvascular occlusion despite a patent infarct-related artery.20 21 Komamura and colleagues22 have shown that myocardial salvage after successful thrombolytic therapy for acute infarction does not occur in patients who exhibit progressive decreases in great cardiac vein flow despite a patent epicardial artery with no high-grade residual stenosis. This would seem to represent clinical documentation of the deleterious effects of microvascular no reflow after successful epicardial thrombolysis.
When an epicardial coronary artery is occluded, the major determinants of infarct size are the perfusion field subtended (the risk area) and the level of residual ischemia.23 Contrary to conventional wisdom, infarct size cannot be well predicted by conventional visual analysis of the coronary angiogram.24 In general, the larger the perfusion field of the occluded vessel, the smaller its collateral flow. Thus, infarcts that result from occlusion of the left anterior descending tend to be significantly larger than those that result from occlusion of the right coronary or circumflex. This is probably the major explanation for the finding of Gibson et al that even the corrected TIMI frame count is significantly longer in patients with left anterior descendingrelated infarction than with infarction related to the right or circumflex arteries.
| Is Prolongation of Coronary Flow Velocity a Specific Sign of No Reflow? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Other conditions that involve transient dysfunction of coronary resistance vessels also may be recognized angiographically as "slow flow." The inadvertent small coronary air embolus occurring during catheterization frequently can be recognized by a tell-tale selective slowing of coronary velocity. If the amount of air is small, such resistance vessel dysfunction can be recognized angiographically only for a few minutes.
| Lessons From the `Slow Flow After Angioplasty' Experience |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The release of such vasoactive agents as serotonin, thromboxane, leukotrienes, and others and their resultant coronary vasoconstrictive effects have been well described.26 Benedict et al27 reported a correlation of plasma serotonin changes with platelet aggregation in a dog model of spontaneous coronary thrombus formation. Transcardiac serotonin concentration increases in selected patients with limiting angina and complex lesion morphology.28 McFadden et al29 showed in patients with coronary disease that intracoronary serotonin resulted in coronary vasoconstriction, reduction in collateral flow, and angina with ECG changes and postulated that serotonin released after intracoronary activation of platelets may aggravate ischemia. Leukocytes within fresh thrombi produce leukotrienes, which are potent microvascular constrictors.30 Pharmacological agents that can inhibit the platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor are presently being used with increasing frequency to treat slow flow states after angioplasty of coronary or saphenous vein atherosclerotic lesions containing thrombi.31 Thus, a large body of evidence suggests that coronary vasoconstrictors, released from the clot during thrombolysis as well as after angioplasty, result in prolongation and occasionally cessation of coronary flow by their effects on coronary resistance vessels. Even if epicardial patency is achieved after thrombolysis (or angioplasty), intense microvascular constriction may significantly limit myocardial salvage.
| Implications for Past and Future Investigations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is increasing evidence that differences in the speed of reperfusion is of paramount importance in achieving the desired therapeutic outcome. A recent meta-analysis of 12 published angiographic studies concluded that TIMI 3 flow is associated with a 46% reduction in mortality compared with TIMI 2 flow.32 There is also suggestive evidence that partial reperfusion may be worse than no reperfusion at all.2 In view of these observations, it has been suggested that since the rate of achieving TIMI 3 flow after the thrombolytic regimen of accelerated tissue-type plasminogen activator plus heparin and aspirin is about 55% compared with an over 90% TIMI 3 flow rate after direct angioplasty, direct angioplasty should now become treatment of choice for acute infarction.33 34 The work of Gibson et al,7 however, cautions against hasty acceptance of this conclusion and suggests that for the present, a definite answer must be tempered with restraint.
The importance of understanding basic concepts underlying the consequences of various methods used to restore flow to partially infarcted myocardium is clear. Other evaluation tools are needed in addition to this angiographic frame counting technique. Careful measurements of a maximally augmented flow reserve performed invasively with Doppler techniques or noninvasively with magnetic resonance imaging or other methodologies may add new insights. Newer echo contrast imaging agents also may permit more frequent examinations at different intervals. Until then, I would maintain some modicum of skepticism regarding the outcome of the thrombolysis versus direct angioplasty debate until decisions concerning the consequences of reperfusion are confirmed by more than a glance at the contrast's flow rate on a video monitor. Simplicity has its virtue. . . sometimes.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Simes RJ, Topol EJ, Holmes DR, White HD, Rutsch WR,
Vahanian A, Simoons ML, Mooris D, Betriu A, Califf RM, Ross AM, for the
GUSTO-I Investigators. Link between the angiographic substudy
and mortality outcomes in a large randomized trial of myocardial
reperfusion. Circulation. 1995;91:1923-1928.
3.
Anderson JL, Karagounis LA, Becker LC, Sorensen SG,
Menlove RL, for the TEAM-3 Investigators. TIMI perfusion grade 3
but not grade 2 results in improved outcome after
thrombolysis for myocardial infarction.
Circulation. 1993;87:1829-1839.
4.
GUSTO Angiographic Investigators. The effects
of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase,
or both on coronary artery patency, ventricular
function, and survival after acute myocardial infarction.
N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1615-1622.
5. Vogt A, von Essen R, Tebbe U, Feuerer W, Appel KF, Neuhaus KL. Impact of early perfusion status of the infarct-related artery on short-term mortality after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: retrospective analysis of four German multicenter studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1391-1395. [Abstract]
6. Karagounis L, Sorensen SG, Menlove RL, Moreno F, Anderson JL, for the TEAM-2 Investigators. Does thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) perfusion grade 2 represent a mostly patent artery or a mostly occluded artery? Enzymatic and electrocardiographic evidence from the TEAM-2 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1-10. [Abstract]
7.
Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WJ, Dodge TJ, Alexander B,
Marble SJ, McCabe CH, Raymond L, Fortin T, Poole WK, Braunwald E, for
the TIMI 4 Study Group. The TIMI Frame Count: a quantitative
method of assessing coronary artery flow.
Circulation. 1996;93:879-888.
8.
Uren NG, Crake T, Lefroy DC, deSilva R, Davies GJ,
Maseri A. Reduced coronary vasodilator function in
infarcted and normal myocardium after myocardial
infarction. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:222-227.
9.
McAlpine HM, Morton JJ, Leckie B, Rumley A, Gillen G,
Dargie HJ. Neuroendocrine activation after acute myocardial
infarction. Br Heart J. 1988;60:117-124.
10. Karlsberg RP, Cryer PE, Roberts R. Serial plasma catecholamine response early in the course of clinical acute myocardial infarction: relationship to infarct extent and mortality. Am Heart J. 1981;102:24-29. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Gibson CM, McCabe CH, Braunwald E, for the TIMI 4 Study Group. Improvements in coronary flow over the first day following thrombolysis. Circulation. 1995;92(suppl I):I-530. Abstract.
12.
Harrison DG, Ferguson DW, Collins SM, Skorton DJ,
Ericksen EE, Kioschos JM, Marcus ML, White CW. Rethrombosis
after reperfusion with streptokinase: importance of geometry of
residual lesions. Circulation. 1984;69:991-999.
13. Gibson CM, Raymond L, Fortin T, Marble SJ, McCabe CH, Daley WL, for the TIMI 4 Investigators. Flow in nonculprit arteries is abnormal 90 minutes after thrombolysis. Circulation. 1995;92(suppl I):I-530. Abstract.
14. Gibson CM, Feldman C, Marble SJ, McCabe CH, Braunwald E, for the TIMI 4 Study Group. Contributions of epicardial and microvascular resistances to TIMI 2 vs 3 flow. Circulation. 1995;92(suppl I):I-529. Abstract.
15. Kloner RA, Ganote CE, Jennings RB. The `no-flow' phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. J Clin Invest. 1974;54:1496-1508.
16.
Gorman MW, Sparks HV Jr. Progressive
coronary vasoconstriction during relative ischemia in
canine myocardium. Circ Res. 1982;51:411-420.
17.
Kloner RA, Rude RE, Carlson N, Maroko PR, DeBoer LWV,
Braunwald E. Ultrastructural evidence of microvascular damage
and myocardial cell injury after coronary artery occlusion:
which comes first? Circulation. 1980;62:945-952.
18. Willerson JT, Powell WJ Jr, Guiney TE, Stark J, Sanders CA, Leaf A. Improvement in myocardial function and coronary blood flow is ischemic myocardium after mannitol. J Clin Invest. 1972;51:2989-2998.
19. Marcus ML. Effects of Coronary Occlusion on Myocardial Perfusion in the Coronary Circulation in Health and Disease. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1983.
20. Jeremy RW, Links JM, Becker LC. Progressive failure of coronary flow during reperfusion of myocardial infarction: documentation of the no reflow phenomenon with positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:695-704. [Abstract]
21.
Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N, Yu H, Higashino Y, Fujii K,
Masuyama T, Kitabatake A, Minamino T. Lack of myocardial
perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis: a
predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in
anterior myocardial infarction.
Circulation. 1992;85:1699-1705.
22. Komamura K, Kitakaze M, Nishida K, Naka M, Tamai J, Uematsu M, Koretsune Y, Nanto S, Hori M, Inoue M, Kamada T, Kodama K. Progressive decreases in coronary vein flow during reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: clinical documentation of the no reflow phenomenon after successful thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:370-377. [Abstract]
23. Schaper W, Remysen P, Xhonneux R. The size of myocardial infarction after experimental coronary artery ligation. Z Kreislaufforschung. 1969;58:904-909. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Feiring AJ, Johnson MR, Kioschos JM, Kirchner PT,
Marcus ML, White CW. The importance of determining the
myocardial area at risk in the evaluation of the outcome of acute
myocardial infarction in patients.
Circulation. 1987;75:980-987.
25. Wilson RF, Laxson DD, Lesser JR, White CW. Intense microvascular constriction after angioplasty of acute thrombotic coronary arterial lesion. Lancet. 1989;1:807-811. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Willerson JT, Golino P, Eidt J, Campbell WB, Buja LM.
Specific platelet mediators and unstable coronary
artery lesions: experimental evidence and potential clinical
implications. Circulation. 1989;80:198-205.
27.
Benedict CR, Mathew B, Rex KA, Cartwright J Jr, Sordahl
LA. Correlation of plasma serotonin changes with
platelet aggregation in an in vivo dog model of spontaneous
occlusive coronary thrombus formation.
Circ Res. 1986;58:58-67.
28.
van den Berg EK, Schmitz JM, Benedict CR, Malloy CR,
Willerson JT, Dehmer GJ. Transcardiac
serotonin concentration is increased in selected patients
with limiting angina and complex coronary lesion
morphology. Circulation. 1989;79:116-124.
29. McFadden EP, Clarke JG, Davies GJ, Kaski JC, Haider AW, Maseri A. Effect of intracoronary serotonin on coronary vessels in patients with stable angina and patients with variant angina. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:648-654. [Abstract]
30. Letts LG, Newman DL, Greenwald SE, Piper PJ. Effects of intra-coronary administration of leukotriene D4 in the anesthetized dog. Prostaglandins. 1983;26:563-572. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Muhlestein JB, Gomez MA, Karagounis LA, Anderson JL. `Rescue ReoPro': acute utilization of Abciximab for the dissolution of coronary thrombus developing as a complication of coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1995;92(suppl I):I-607. Abstract.
32. Fath-Ordoubadi F, Huehns TY, Al-Mohammad A, Beatt KJ. TIMI grade 2 flow is not equivalent to TIMI 3: implications for the use of thrombolytic therapy: a meta-analysis of the trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:401A. Abstract.
33.
Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, Rothbaum D, Stone GW,
O'Keefe J, Overlie P, Donohue B, Chelliah N, Timmis GC. A
comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic
therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl
J Med. 1993;328:673-679.
34.
Forrester JS. New standard for success of
thrombolytic therapy.
Circulation. 1995;92:2026-2028.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. K. French, T. A. Hyde, I. T. Straznicky, J. Andrews, M. Lund, D. J. Amos, A. Zambanini, C. J. Ellis, B. J. Webber, S. C. McLaughlin, et al. Relationship between corrected TIMI frame counts at three weeks and late survival after myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2000; 35(6): 1516 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J K French, I T Straznicky, B J Webber, P E Aylward, M J Frey, A A J Adgey, B F Williams, S C McLaughlin, and H D White Angiographic frame counts 90 minutes after streptokinase predict left ventricular function at 48 hours following myocardial infarction Heart, February 1, 1999; 81(2): 128 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |