| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1996;93:691-696.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston (Ontario) General Hospital; the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto (Ontario), Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto (J.D.P.); and SOCAR Research SA, Givrins, Switzerland (A.B.P.).
Correspondence to John D. Parker, MD, FRCPC, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Suite 1609, 600 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5 Canada.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Twelve patients with chronic stable angina were studied in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Patients received diuretic (hydrochlorothiazide plus amiloride) or placebo for 14 to 20 days. During each double-blind treatment period, patients underwent treadmill exercise testing on three separate occasions. The first exercise testing was performed after 7 to 10 days of single-blind, placebo transdermal nitroglycerin therapy. Subsequently, exercise testing was repeated on the first day of active transdermal nitroglycerin therapy and following 7 to 10 days of continuous transdermal nitroglycerin application. Therapy with a diuretic was associated with an increase in exercise capacity but had no effect on nitroglycerin tolerance. During therapy with placebo transdermal nitroglycerin, diuretic therapy caused an increase in treadmill walking time to the development of moderate angina compared with placebo (371±26 versus 288±16 seconds, diuretic versus placebo, P<.01). Similar results were obtained during both acute and sustained nitroglycerin therapy.
Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate that therapy with a diuretic has no effect on the development of tolerance to continuous transdermal nitroglycerin. Interestingly, diuretic therapy itself has important antianginal effects and improves exercise capacity in patients with stable angina.
Key Words: nitroglycerin angina diuretics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-mm horizontal or
downsloping ST-segment depression when measured 80 ms after the
J-point. None had a history of congestive heart failure or
hypertension. All had a left ventricular ejection fraction
of
50% by either two-dimensional
echocardiography or contrast ventriculography.
Other specific exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with
valvular disease, hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy, or vasospastic angina; unstable
angina or myocardial infarction within 3 months; surgical or
percutaneous revascularization
within 6 months; exercise capacity limited by either claudication or
noncardiac dyspnea; pacemaker dependency; clinically significant anemia
or renal or hepatic disease; and patients taking ß-adrenergic
receptor blockers, long-acting nitrates, calcium channel
antagonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme
inhibitors, diuretics, vasodilators, or
digoxin.
Exercise Testing Reproducibility and Nitrate
Responsiveness
After informed consent was obtained, all antianginal
and other
medications excluded by the protocol were discontinued. Patients were
allowed to use sublingual GTN during the study period but not on the
study days until after exercise testing was completed. Treadmill
exercise testing was carried out using the standard Bruce protocol.
Patients were instructed to indicate the onset of angina (P1) and to
continue exercise to moderate angina (P2), the point at which they
would normally discontinue activity. To confirm reproducibility,
patients underwent another exercise test at least 1 day later using
similar end points. Reproducibility was defined as the time to P2
during consecutive tests being within 15%. If reproducibility was not
documented after four exercise tests on different days, the patient was
excluded from further participation in the study. A standard 12-lead
ECG monitoring system was used during all exercise testing procedures.
A 12-lead ECG was recorded in the supine and standing positions
before exercise and at 1-minute intervals throughout the exercise test.
Blood pressure was recorded with the same sphygmomanometer in the
sitting and standing positions before exercise testing, every 3 minutes
during exercise, and at both P1 and P2.
The primary end point was treadmill walking time to P2. Other end points included the time to P1, treadmill walking time to the development of 1 mm of ST-segment depression, and heart rates and blood pressures at P1 and P2.
General Protocol Design
Patients were randomized to receive
either a diuretic
(50 mg hydrochlorothiazide combined with 5 mg
amiloride) or matching placebo for a period of 14 to 20 days in a
double-blind manner (Fig 1
). Subsequently they
crossed over to the other treatment period. During each of the two
double-blind treatment periods, patients received single-blind
placebo GTN patches (Ciba Geigy) for the first 7 to 10 days. These
patches were applied at 8 AM daily and left in place for 24
hours. After this therapy period, patients returned to the
cardiovascular laboratory at 7:30 AM and
underwent treadmill exercise testing at 8 AM according to
the protocol outlined above. After this test, the placebo GTN patch was
changed and patients underwent repeat exercise testing at 12 noon and 4
PM. These exercise tests (testing day 1) were designed to
determine whether diuretic therapy had an independent
antianginal effect. Patients returned to the laboratory the following
morning at 7:30. They underwent repeat treadmill exercise testing at 8
AM. Subsequently, they were given an active transdermal GTN
patch (0.8 mg/h, Transderm-Nitro, Ciba Geigy) in a single-blind
fashion and underwent repeat treadmill exercise testing at 12 noon and
4 PM. This day (testing day 2) was designed to document the
patients' responses to acute therapy with transdermal GTN patches.
Subsequently, patients received single-blind, transdermal GTN
patches (0.8 mg/h) administered continuously for the next 5 to 7 days.
Patches were changed daily at 8 AM. At the end of this
treatment period, patients underwent another series of exercise tests
(testing day 3). This testing day was designed to determine the
response to sustained, continuous transdermal GTN patch therapy in the
presence and absence of concomitant diuretic therapy.
|
The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Statistical Methods
The method of Hills and
Armitage18 for
analysis of a two-period crossover trial was used to
determine whether there was a treatment effect (diuretic versus
placebo) on treadmill walking times, heart rate, systolic blood
pressure, and rate-pressure product. The analysis
examined the data for the presence of an interaction between the two
treatment arms. Such an interaction may be observed if one
double-blind treatment period has significant effects on the
subsequent treatment period. The analysis also examined for the
presence of a period effect. A period effect is found when the observed
result appears to be dependent on the order of treatment. Treadmill
walking times on the 3 different testing days were compared by ANOVA
for repeated measures with application of Scheffé's post hoc
test. All data are presented as the mean±SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
The improvement in exercise performance associated with
diuretic therapy was also observed throughout the remainder of
the study period (Figs 2 through
4![]()
![]()
, Tables 1
and
2
). Although there
appeared to be some attenuation in this effect over time, the ANOVA
revealed no significant differences in treadmill walking time to P1, to
P2, or to 1 mm of ST-segment depression on testing day 3 compared with
testing day 1. These effects on exercise performance
were observed in the absence of either a significant treatment
interaction or period effect.
Effects of Diuretic Therapy on the Development of GTN
Tolerance
On day 2, the acute administration of transdermal GTN
patches
caused an increase in treadmill walking time to both P1 and P2 at 12
noon and 4 PM. This response was seen during both the
diuretic and placebo therapy periods (Figs 2 through
4![]()
![]()
, Tables 1
and
2
). Importantly, on testing day 3, after sustained continuous
transdermal GTN therapy, there was evidence of tolerance with treadmill
walking times at 8 AM, 12 noon, and 4 PM
similar to those observed on testing day 1.
Effects of Diuretic Therapy on Heart Rate and Blood
Pressure
Standing heart rate and blood pressure at rest before
exercise at
8 AM on each of the testing days are presented in
Table 3
. During the diuretic therapy period,
standing systolic blood pressure tended to be lower and heart
rate higher compared with the placebo period. The crossover
analysis found that only the increase in heart rate at 8
AM on testing days 1 and 2 was statistically significant. A
similar pattern was observed for standing systolic blood
pressure and heart rate at the other time points (data not shown).
|
Heart rate and systolic blood pressure responses at P1 and P2
are presented in Tables 1
and 2
. During diuretic
therapy, patients achieved a higher heart rate and blood pressure at
both P1 and P2 compared with the placebo therapy period. This
difference is most clearly seen when one examines the rate-pressure
product achieved at P1 and P2 (Tables 1
and 2
).
At most (but not
all) testing time points, the crossover analysis revealed that
during diuretic therapy, patients achieved a significantly
greater rate-pressure product at both P1 and P2. Importantly,
at several of these time points, the crossover analysis
identified a significant interaction between the two treatment periods,
and thus, it is not possible to be certain that this represents
an independent effect of diuretic therapy.
An additional two patients experienced adverse events and were withdrawn from the study protocol. One patient randomized to diuretic therapy was withdrawn from the study after developing nonsustained ventricular tachycardia during exercise testing. A second patient randomized to diuretic therapy developed atrial fibrillation and was withdrawn from further study. There was no evidence of an electrolyte disturbance in either case. Since no comparative data were available, information from these patients was not included in the analysis.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although both the cause and significance of plasma volume expansion during nitrate therapy remain unclear, both sodium retention and a transvascular fluid shift occurring secondary to changes in Starling's forces have been implicated.8 9 10 13 We previously reported that diuretic therapy did not prevent either the development of tolerance or evidence of plasma volume expansion during continuous transdermal GTN therapy in normal volunteers.13 Sussex et al14 reported that concurrent diuretic therapy prevented the development of tolerance to isosorbide dinitrate given four times daily. Importantly, that investigation did not examine the impact of diuretic therapy alone on exercise performance, and the observed result may represent a primary antianginal effect of the diuretic. The present investigation provides convincing evidence that diuretic therapy caused an improvement in exercise capacity but did not prevent the development of tolerance during continuous administration of transdermal GTN. This is not surprising, since most recent investigations have suggested that plasma volume expansion during sustained nitrate therapy occurs in the absence of any major changes in sodium balance.10 12
Previous investigations have confirmed that blood volume is an important determinant of myocardial oxygen demand in patients with coronary disease and angina pectoris.15 The administration of furosemide was associated with an increase in exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease.16 In 1973, Floyd and Domenet17 reported that chlorthalidone reduced the number of anginal episodes and GTN consumption in a group of patients with stable angina pectoris. There have been no previous randomized trials of the use of diuretics in patients with angina pectoris, and the use of diuretics in patients with angina has generally been reserved for patients with concurrent hypertension or congestive heart failure.
The present study demonstrates that the combination of hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride has potent antianginal effects in patients with stable angina pectoris. The improvement in exercise performance with this drug regimen was substantial. The average increase in treadmill walking time to P2 during diuretic therapy was 65 seconds, a figure that compares favorably with other agents approved for the therapy of chronic stable angina.23 24 25 It is important to recognize that the patients in this study had no history of congestive heart failure and were normotensive. Furthermore, all of these patients had preserved left ventricular systolic function.
The mechanism of the antianginal effect of diuretic therapy remains uncertain. The results suggest that diuretic therapy caused a reduction in left ventricular preload during exercise. During the diuretic therapy period, patients were able to achieve a greater rate-pressure product at the onset of angina and at the development of moderate angina. The rate-pressure product is an imperfect indicator of myocardial oxygen requirements, because it does not assess the influence of changes in left ventricular volume or contractility. Despite this shortcoming, the ability to achieve a greater rate-pressure product most probably occurred secondary to a reduction in left ventricular preload, the other major determinant of myocardial oxygen demand.
It is possible that the observed antianginal effect of hydrochlorothiazide therapy would not be sustained during longer treatment periods if the preload-reducing effect were only transient. Although there has been considerable controversy concerning the mechanism of action of thiazides in hypertension,26 most studies suggest that these agents are associated with a decrease in plasma volume during long-term therapy.27 28 29 30
There are other potential mechanisms for the observed antianginal effect. Although thiazide diuretic therapy could have caused a reduction in coronary vascular resistance, we do not believe that this is the explanation for their antianginal effect. In fact, agents that dilate coronary resistance vessels may exacerbate angina in patients with epicardial coronary stenoses through the phenomenon of coronary steal.31 It is possible that the use of amiloride in this study may have had an impact on the results. Although thiazides are not believed to have any direct cardiac effects, amiloride has been shown to be cardioprotective in the setting of ischemia, particularly in models of reperfusion.32 33 Furthermore, in one report, amiloride was found to have negative inotropic effects in an in vitro animal model.34 Although there have been no studies of the effect of amiloride on human myocardium, it is possible that the observed antianginal effect was mediated by a direct myocardial action of amiloride.
The role of diuretic therapy in the management of angina remains uncertain. In light of available therapeutic options, the authors do not suggest that diuretics be adopted as part of routine management in patients with angina. Diuretics can cause electrolyte disturbances and have potentially adverse metabolic effects. This concern has received considerable attention, since diuretics in the therapy of hypertension do not reduce the risk of death from coronary artery disease.35 Whether this increase in risk was secondary to metabolic effects of thiazides or their effects on electrolyte balance remains unknown. However, these concerns mandate a conservative approach to the use of diuretics in the management of angina.
Despite these limitations, diuretic therapy may have an important role in certain circumstances. It is our belief that diuretics should be considered in the patient who has refractory symptoms or is intolerant to more traditional agents. The present study did not specifically address the question of whether diuretics could improve exercise tolerance in patients with symptoms despite treatment with other antianginal agents. Interestingly, the role of multiple drug therapy for angina remains controversial, with few convincing data supporting the use of multiple drug therapy in angina.36 Despite this uncertainty, the present data would support a therapeutic trial of diuretics in the patient with angina who has symptoms despite optimal medical management when revascularization procedures are not feasible or have not been successful.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 8, 1995; revision received September 19, 1995; accepted September 25, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Thadani U, Fung H-L, Darke AC, Parker JO. Oral isosorbide dinitrate in angina pectoris: comparison of duration of action and dose response relation during acute and sustained therapy. Am J Cardiol. 1982;49:411-419. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Reichek N, Priest C, Zimrin D, St John Sutton M. Antianginal effects of nitroglycerin patches. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:1-7. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Parker JO, Fung H-L, Ruggirello D, Stone JA.
Tolerance to isosorbide dinitrate: rate of development and
reversal. Circulation. 1983;68:1074-1080.
5. Parker JO. Nitrate therapy in stable angina pectoris. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1635-1642. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Packer M. Clinical significance of nitrate tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 1989;10(suppl A):20-25.
7. Abrams J. Clinical aspects of nitrate tolerance. Eur Heart J. 1991;12(suppl E):42-52.
8. Packer M. What causes tolerance to nitroglycerine? The 100 year old mystery continues. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:932-935. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Parker JD, Farrell B, Fenton T, Cohanim M, Parker
JO. Counter-regulatory responses to continuous and
intermittent therapy with nitroglycerin.
Circulation. 1991;84:2336-2345.
10. Parker JD, Parker JO. Effect of therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on hemodynamic and counterregulatory responses during continuous therapy with nitroglycerin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:1445-1453. [Abstract]
11. Lis Y, Bennett D, Lambert G, Robson D. A preliminary double-blind study of intravenous nitroglycerin in acute myocardial infarction. Intensive Care Med. 1984;10:179-184. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Dupuis J, Lalonde G, Lemieux R, Rouleau JL. Tolerance to intravenous nitroglycerin in patients with congestive heart failure: role of increased intravascular volume, neurohumoral activation and lack of prevention with N-acetylcysteine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:923-931. [Abstract]
13. Parker JD, Farrell B, Fenton T, Parker JO. Effects of diuretic therapy on the development of tolerance during continuous therapy with nitroglycerin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:616-622. [Abstract]
14. Sussex BA, Campbell NRC, Raju MK, McKay DW. The antianginal efficacy of isosorbide dinitrate therapy is maintained during diuretic treatment. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994;56:229-234. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Parker JO, Case RB, Khaja F, Ledwich JR, Armstrong
PW. The influence of changes in blood volume on angina pectoris:
a study of the effect of phlebotomy.
Circulation. 1970;41:593-604.
16.
Nechwatal W, Konig E, Isbary J, Greding H, Stauch
M. Haemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects of frusemide
during supine exercise in patients with angina pectoris.
Br Heart J. 1980;44:67-74.
17. Floyd CB, Domenet JG. Chlorthalidone in the treatment of angina pectoris. Practitioner. 1973;210:559-565. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Hills M, Armitage P. The two-period cross-over clinical trial. Br J Pharmacol. 1979;8:7-20.
19. Abdollah A, Moffat JA, Armstrong PW. N-Acetylcysteine does not modify nitroglycerin-induced tolerance in canine vascular rings. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;9:445-450. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Imhof P, Renwald D, Muller P, Howald H, Burkart F. Circulatory counter-regulations induced by continuous administration of nitroglycerin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989;11:409-414.
21.
Muiesan ML, Agabiti-Rosei E, Romanelli M, Beschi M,
Castellano M, Cefis M, Cerri B, Pollavini G, Muiesan B.
Transdermal nitroglycerin efficacy in patients with
chronic stable angina pectoris is related to sympathetic and
renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
activity. Eur Heart J. 1992;13:15-21.
22.
Feldman RL, Conti CR. Relief of myocardial
ischemia with nitroglycerin: what is the
mechanism? Circulation. 1981;64:1098-1100.
23.
Alderman EL, Davies RO, Crowley JJ, Lopes MG, Brooker
JC, Friedman JP, Graham AF, Matlof HJ, Harrison DC. Dose
response effectiveness of propranolol for the treatment of
angina pectoris. Circulation. 1975;51:964-972.
24. Wagniart P, Ferguson RJ, Chaitman BR, Achard F, Benacerraf A, Delanguenhagen B, Morin B, Pasternac A, Bourassa MG. Increased exercise tolerance and reduced electrocardiographic ischemia with diltiazem in patients with stable angina pectoris. Circulation. 1982;66:22-28.
25. Parker JO, Farrell B, Lahey KA, Moe G. Effect of intervals between doses on the development of tolerance to isosorbide dinitrate. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1440-1444. [Abstract]
26.
Conway J, Lauwers P. Hemodynamic
and hypotensive effects of long-term therapy with
chlorothiazide.
Circulation. 1960;21:21-27.
27. Hansen J. Hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension: the effects on blood volume, exchangeable sodium and blood pressure. Acta Med Scand. 1968;183:317-321. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Tarazi RC, Dustan HP, Frohlich ED. Long-term
thiazide therapy in essential hypertension: evidence for persistent
alteration in plasma volume and renin activity.
Circulation. 1970;41:709-717.
29.
Leth A. Changes in plasma and extracellular
fluid volumes in patients with essential hypertension during
long-term treatment with
hydrochlorothiazide.
Circulation. 1970;42:479-485.
30. Shah S, Khatri I, Freis E. Mechanism of antihypertensive effect of thiazide diuretics. Am Heart J. 1978;95:611-618. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Fam WM, McGregor M. Effect of
nitroglycerin and dipyridamole on
regional coronary resistance. Circ
Res. 1968;22:649-659.
32. Karmazyn M, Ray M, Haist JV. Comparative effects of Na+/H+ exchange inhibitors against cardiac injury produced by ischemia/reperfusion, hypoxia/reoxygenation, and the calcium paradox. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1993;21:172-178. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Karmazyn M. Amiloride enhances postischemic ventricular recovery: possible role of Na+/H+ exchange. Am J Physiol. 1988;255:608-615.
34.
Pierce GN, Cole WC, Liu K, Massaeli H, Maddaford TG,
Chen YJ, McPherson CD, Jain S, Sontag D. Modulation of cardiac
performance by amiloride and selected derivatives of
amiloride. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993;265:1280-1291.
35.
Wikstrand J, Warnold I, Olsson G, Tuomilehto J,
Elmfeldt D, Berglund G. Primary prevention with metoprolol in
patients with hypertension: mortality results from the MAPHY
study. JAMA. 1988;259:1976-1982.
36. Packer M. Drug therapy: combined beta-adrenergic and calcium-entry blockade in angina pectoris. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:709-718. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Hunt, W. T. Abraham, M. H. Chin, A. M. Feldman, G. S. Francis, T. G. Ganiats, M. Jessup, M. A. Konstam, D. M. Mancini, K. Michl, et al. 2009 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 14, 2009; 53(15): e1 - e90. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
2005 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, S. A. Hunt, W. T. Abraham, M. H. Chin, A. M. Feldman, G. S. Francis, T. G. Ganiats, M. Jessup, M. A. Konstam, D. M. Mancini, et al. 2009 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Circulation, April 14, 2009; 119(14): e391 - e479. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gori and J. D. Parker Nitrate Tolerance: A Unifying Hypothesis Circulation, November 5, 2002; 106(19): 2510 - 2513. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. Stevenson and R. L. Kormos Mechanical cardiac support 2000: current applications and future trial design: June 15-16, 2000 Bethesda, Maryland J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 340 - 370. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Parker and J. O. Parker Nitrate Therapy for Stable Angina Pectoris N. Engl. J. Med., February 19, 1998; 338(8): 520 - 531. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Watanabe, M. Kakihana, S. Ohtsuka, and Y. Sugishita Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Supplemental Vitamin E on Attenuation of the Development of Nitrate Tolerance Circulation, October 21, 1997; 96(8): 2545 - 2550. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |