(Circulation. 1996;93:2052-2058.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Medizinische Klinik III, Division of Cardiology (T.M.) and the Institute for Applied Physiology (E.B.), University of Freiburg (Germany).
Correspondence to Thomas Münzel, MD, Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Medizinische Klinik III, Hugstetterstr 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-adrenergicmediated vasoconstriction, particularly on
withdrawal of nitroglycerin. Methods and Results Chronically instrumented dogs were treated for 5 days with nitroglycerin (1.5 µg·kg-1·min-1 IV) alone or in combination with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril (0.1 mg/kg two times daily or 1 mg/kg). With long-term nitroglycerin therapy, the left anterior circumflex artery was maximally dilated 4 hours after the start of nitroglycerin infusion (9.5±0.6%) and returned to baseline levels within the third day of treatment (baseline, 2.52±0.07 mm; day 3, 2.55±0.07 mm; P=NS), indicating a complete loss of nitroglycerin-induced coronary vasodilatation. Nitroglycerin infusion also was accompanied by a transient increase in plasma renin activity. Sudden withdrawal of nitroglycerin infusion caused a progressive constriction of the left anterior circumflex artery, which peaked 4 hours after nitroglycerin infusion cessation (-7.8±0.2%). This occurred in the absence of elevated plasma renin activity. Concomitant treatment with high-dose enalapril (1 mg·kg-1·d-1) markedly reduced the degree of tolerance and prevented the rebound constriction on cessation of nitroglycerin therapy.
Conclusions Long-term ACE inhibition with high-dose enalapril reduces nitroglycerin tolerance and prevents rebound vasoconstriction in coronary arteries. These phenomena were not associated with an activated circulating renin-angiotensin system. This observation suggests that during long-term nitroglycerin treatment, intrinsic abnormalities of the vascular smooth muscle may have developed that are suppressed by concomitant ACE inhibitor therapy. The present study also favors a combination of nitroglycerin and ACE inhibitors to maintain nitrate sensitivity of the vasculature during long-term nitroglycerin treatment.
Key Words: nitroglycerin circulation pharmacology
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Another aspect of the organic nitrate therapy is the development of rebound ischemia on abrupt cessation of long-term therapy. This is associated with angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and even sudden cardiac death.12 13 14 In patients with coronary artery disease, it generally is not possible to interpret whether recurrence of angina pectoris symptoms after nitroglycerin withdrawal reflects rebound constriction within the coronary circulation or whether this phenomenon is simply the consequence of cessation of an antianginal therapy.
On the basis of these considerations, we performed this study to directly analyze the consequences of sudden nitroglycerin withdrawal on large coronary conductance and resistance vessels and to address the possible role of the RAS in nitroglycerin tolerance and rebound phenomena. To perform these studies, we used a well-characterized animal model of nitrate tolerance and examined the effect of treatment with the nonsulfhydryl-containing ACE inhibitor enalapril.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Groups of Dogs and Experimental Protocols
Two groups were studied (see the Table
). In group
1, designated the control group, the effects of
nitroglycerin infusion and withdrawal on
coronary and systemic hemodynamic
parameters (group 1a) were examined. After a 2-week washout
period, the effects of enalapril (1 mg/kg) on systemic and
coronary hemodynamic parameters
were studied (group 1b). Group 2 was designated the treatment group. In
this group, we studied the effects of a combination therapy of
nitroglycerin and either low-dose (0.2 mg/kg=0.1
mg/kg twice daily, group 2a) or high-dose (1.0 mg/kg, group 2b)
enalapril on the development of tolerance and rebound. Similar to the
experiments in group 1, the protocols using low- and high-dose
enalapril were separated by a 2-week washout period.
|
Blood samples for determination of PRA were drawn before infusion (two control values), during long-term nitroglycerin infusion (4 hours; 1 to 5 days after the start of infusion), and during the withdrawal period (30 minutes; 2, 4, and 24 hours after nitroglycerin infusion was stopped). Blood samples were obtained at 9 AM before the systemic and coronary hemodynamic parameters were determined. Before the blood samples were collected, the dogs rested for at least 30 minutes. PRA and the ACE activity were determined as previously described.18 19
In separate experiments, we examined the effects of 0.1 mg/kg enalapril on the Ang I pressor response in four conscious dogs. Increasing concentrations of Ang I (ranging from 10 to 1000 ng/kg bolus IV) were administered, and blood pressure was recorded. In these experiments, Ang I caused a concentration-dependent increase in mean arterial pressure. The area under the curve was integrated, and the data are presented as the pressure-time integral (millimeters of mercury times minutes). The pressure-time integral was determined before and 2 hours after administration of enalapril 0.1 mg/kg PO. Blood samples also were drawn before and after low-dose enalapril to determine the ACE activity before and after enalapril infusion.
Drugs
The drugs and intravenous solutions used were
nitroglycerin (Pohl Boskamp) and enalapril (Merck,
Sharp, and Dohme).
Statistical Analysis
All values are presented as mean±SEM. For comparison of
coronary diameters to the baseline value within a protocol, a
one-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons, followed by a t
test with Bonferroni's correction for the numbers of comparison, was
used. Ang I pressor responses before and after enalapril infusion were
compared with a repeated measures ANOVA. A Scheffé post hoc test
was used to examine differences between the dose responses when
significance was indicated. A value of P<.05 was considered
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Similar to previous reports,16 17 LCx diameter returned to baseline within 2 to 3 days of continuous nitroglycerin treatment under ongoing nitroglycerin infusion, indicating the development of tolerance in epicardial conductance vessels.
In the early withdrawal phase (30 minutes after nitroglycerin infusion), we observed a transient increase in mean arterial pressure (from 96±3 to 106±3 mm Hg, P<.05) and a small but significant constriction of the LCx artery. Maximal constriction of the LCx was observed 4 hours after nitroglycerin infusion was stopped (-7.8±1%). Twenty-four hours after the cessation of nitroglycerin infusion, all coronary and systemic hemodynamic parameters did not differ significantly from values obtained before nitroglycerin infusion.
Effects of Long-term ACE Inhibitor Treatment on
Coronary and Systemic Hemodynamic
Parameters in Dogs With and Without
Nitroglycerin Treatment
As Fig 1
shows, enalapril per se (1 mg/kg) had no significant
effect on coronary artery diameter, coronary flow, and
systemic hemodynamic parameters such as
mean arterial pressure and heart rate. In dogs treated
concomitantly with nitroglycerin and enalapril (1.0
mg/kg) for 5 days, the large coronary artery diameter remained
significantly dilated throughout the entire
nitroglycerin infusion period, although some degree of
tolerance was observed on days 4 and 5 (LCx diameters were
significantly smaller on days 4 and 5 compared with the 4-hour
nitroglycerin infusion period). High-dose enalapril
also prevented early rebound with respect to mean arterial
pressure and prevented rebound constriction of large coronary
arteries, whereas low-dose enalapril (0.2 mg/kg) was ineffective in
preventing tolerance and rebound (Fig 2
).
|
Effects of Nitroglycerin Infusion and the
Combination Therapy of Nitroglycerin and Enalapril (0.2
and 1 mg/kg) on PRA in Chronically Instrumented Dogs
In dogs treated with nitroglycerin alone (group
1a), initiation of nitroglycerin therapy was associated
with a significant increase in PRA (from 0.40±0.08 to 1.24±0.16
ng·mL-1·h-1
[4-hour value]). During long-term infusion, PRA values constantly
declined (Fig 3
) and did not differ significantly from
baseline at day 4 of nitroglycerin infusion.
|
In dogs treated with nitroglycerin and low-dose enalapril (group 2a), PRA peaked 4 hours after nitroglycerin infusion started (from 0.62±0.10 to 1.20±0.06 ng·mL-1·h-1, P<.05). As in dogs treated with nitroglycerin alone, PRA significantly declined steadily during nitroglycerin infusion and did not differ from baseline at day 4 of nitroglycerin infusion.
In dogs treated concomitantly with nitroglycerin and high-dose enalapril (group 2b), PRA values remained significantly elevated compared with dogs treated with nitroglycerin alone throughout the entire nitroglycerin infusion and withdrawal period, compatible with an effective ACE blockade.
The lack of significant effects of low-dose enalapril on PRA may
indicate that the chosen concentration is too small to exert a
significant inhibition of the ACE. To address this issue, we tested the
effects of low-dose enalapril (2 hours after dosing) on the
angiotensin-induced pressor action and ACE activity. As
Fig 4
shows, enalapril (0.1 mg/kg) effectively shifted
the dose pressor response to significantly higher Ang I concentrations
and caused a significant inhibition of the ACE activity.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nitroglycerin Rebound
Early reports found a substantial increase in mortality in workers
exposed to nitroglycerin compared with age-matched
control subjects. Ischemic periods usually occurred at
nitrate-free intervals in workers having years of
nitroglycerin exposure. These individuals had manifest
objective evidence of atheromatous disease at
autopsy.20 Similar rebound phenomena also were reported to
occur after cessation of prolonged therapy with
nitroglycerin or sodium nitroprusside
infusion,12 21 oral therapy with isosorbide
dinitrate,14 or nitroglycerin
patches13 22 in patients with coronary artery
disease or heart failure. The underlying mechanisms, however, remain
poorly defined. Sudden withdrawal of nitroprusside in patients has been
shown to cause an early hemodynamic
rebound,21 a phenomenon observed in an experimental model
of heart failure23 after sudden withdrawal of
nitroglycerin. Similarly, in the current studies, mean
arterial pressure was significantly increased 30 minutes
after nitroglycerin cessation compared with baseline
values. Although the mechanisms underlying this early rebound remain
obscure, it seems likely that because of the short elimination
half-life of nitroglycerin (minutes), the
vasorelaxant effects may be removed so rapidly that the
counterregulatory vasoconstrictor effects, which are still operative,
become unopposed.23
This early rebound phenomenon, however, does not explain clinical
observations of recurrence of angina in patients with
coronary artery disease 3 to 4 hours after interruption of
nitroglycerin therapy,22 even in the
absence of significant changes in systemic
hemodynamics12 and circulating
vasoconstrictor forces. With the present studies, we demonstrated
that sudden cessation of long-term nitroglycerin
treatment leads to a rebound constriction of large coronary
arteries that peaked 4 hours after the nitroglycerin
infusion was stopped. The maximal constriction of the outer LCx
diameter averaged 8%. Taking into account a ratio of wall thickness to
diameter of 1:4, this would mean a reduction in cross-sectional
area by
50%. Although it may be difficult to extrapolate this
observation to the clinical situation, a marked increase in large
coronary artery tone after nitroglycerin
withdrawal could indeed represent a
pathophysiological mechanism responsible for
ischemic periods in patients, eg, with eccentric
coronary artery stenosis. The observed increase in
large artery tone with a peak 4 hours after cessation of
nitroglycerin therapy would also explain recent
observations demonstrating that a nitrate-free interval after
transdermal nitroglycerin therapy was associated with a
marked decrease in anginal threshold for 4 to 6 hours after patch
removal.24
In contrast to large coronary artery constriction, we could not detect a significant change in coronary blood flow after cessation of nitroglycerin therapy. This finding suggests a different susceptibility of large conductance and small resistance vessels to develop rebound. Previous reports showed that in contrast to large arteries, arterioles cannot metabolize nitroglycerin into its vasoactive metabolite nitric oxide.25 26 Furthermore, clinical and experimental studies demonstrated that in the setting of tolerance in large arterial conductance vessels, the arteriolar responsiveness to nitroglycerin is retained.27 28 Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that only vessel segments that can biotransform nitroglycerin develop an increase in tone after cessation of long-term nitroglycerin exposure. Studies of the coronary resistance vessels are further confounded by the propensity of these vessels to be modulated predominantly by autoregulation.
Role of the RAS in Tolerance and Rebound
In the present study, chronic nitroglycerin
infusion was associated with an activation of the circulating RAS.
Values for PRA of dogs treated with nitroglycerin alone
peaked 4 hours after initiation of nitroglycerin
infusion, indicating maximal neurohormonal stimulation during the early
nitroglycerin infusion phase (Fig 3
). During
long-term infusion, PRA gradually declined and by day 4 did not
differ from baseline. The transient nature of the activation of the
circulating RAS may be explained by the well-known development of
systemic hemodynamic tolerance within 24 to 48 hours of
continuous nitroglycerin treatment, resulting in less
baroreflex stimulation and a subsequently attenuated neurohormonal
response.
By comparing the time course of activation of the RAS during long-term nitroglycerin infusion with the time course of tolerance development in large coronary arteries, we established a maximal dilation of the circumflex branch 4 and 24 hours after initiation of nitroglycerin infusion, despite a markedly stimulated RAS. This indicates that during the early nitroglycerin infusion period, increased levels of circulating Ang II cannot override nitroglycerin-induced coronary vasodilation. Within 2 to 3 days of continuous nitroglycerin treatment, however, tolerance developed in large epicardial arteries, although PRA at this time was significantly less compared with the 4-hour-infusion values. Furthermore, maximal coronary artery constriction during the withdrawal period (4 hours after nitroglycerin infusion was stopped) occurred even without signs of an activation of the circulating RAS. These findings clearly demonstrate that activation of the circulating RAS is not a prerequisite for nitroglycerin tolerance and rebound.
More likely, intrinsic abnormalities of the tolerant vasculature itself may have emerged including, eg, an increase in sensitivity to circulating vasoconstrictors, activation of the local RAS, or attenuation of nitroglycerin action caused by an impaired intracellular nitroglycerin biotransformation.
Recent experimental and clinical data from our group indicate that long-term nitroglycerin therapy is associated with a marked increase in sensitivity to circulating vasoconstrictors.8 29 We also established an increase in sensitivity to the direct protein kinase C activator phorbolester 12,13 dibutyrate8 and an induction of endothelin-1 expression in the vascular media of nitrate-tolerant aorta. From these observations, we proposed that autocrine-produced endothelin-1 may serve as a priming stimulus for protein kinase C activation, which in turn mediates hypersensitivity to almost all vasoconstrictor stimuli.8 Interestingly, in cultured smooth muscle cells, low concentrations of Ang II induced expression of preproendothelin mRNA through stimulation of the Ang type 1 receptor in a protein kinase Cdependent fashion.9 Ang II also facilitates norepinephrine release rates from nerve endings and enhances the already-augmented sympathetic activity during nitroglycerin infusion.28 30 In addition, preliminary data indicate that concomitant treatment with the Ang II receptor antagonist losartan (angiotensin type 1 receptor) but not concomitant treatment with ß-blockers (unpublished observations) completely prevents tolerance development and an increase in sensitivity to vasoconstrictors.31 Therefore, an Ang IIendothelin-1mediated increase in sensitivity to vasoconstrictors could explain at least in part the progressive loss of nitroglycerin coronary vasodilator effect during long-term infusion. It could also represent a potential mechanism for the observed coronary rebound constriction and the development of hemodynamic tolerance even in the absence of an activated circulating RAS.32 An increase in vascular ACE activity in response to long-term nitroglycerin treatment is not very likely because increased circulating Ang II levels inhibit rather than stimulate through a negative feedback the activity and expression of the vascular ACE.33
The present data are similar to those from previous investigations, showing that tolerance has different effects in different vascular beds.17 28 High-dose enalapril caused a sustained epicardial artery dilation for several days, but mean arterial pressure and heart rate responses were no different in low-dose enalapril or control groups. Furthermore, tolerance to the circumflex dilation in dogs treated with high-dose enalapril is rather substantial by days 4 and 5, rather close to control levels. The absence of adverse rebound phenomena suggests that tolerance is not complete. Thus, partial tolerance (and dependence) is present by day 5 in the high-dose group. This may suggest that other mechanisms such as enhanced inactivation of nitric oxide by endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor factors (eg, vascular superoxide anions)7 or an impairment of intracellular nitroglycerin biotransformation itself34 may come into play, thereby limiting the nitroglycerin coronary vasodilative effects during long-term administration.
From our observations, however, we cannot conclude entirely that the beneficial effects of ACE inhibition on tolerance and rebound are secondary to an additional endothelium-derived nitric oxidemediated vasodilator stimulus. The ACE is identical to kininase II, an enzyme involved in the breakdown of the endothelium-dependent vasodilator bradykinin.35 36 Therefore, long-term ACE inhibition during nitroglycerin infusion may be associated with an accumulation of locally generated kinins, which in turn may activate endothelium-mediated vasodilator effects.
High- Versus Low-Dose Enalapril
Enalapril in a concentration of 1.0 mg/kg retarded tolerance,
prevented rebound coronary rebound constriction, and led to
consistently elevated PRA values compatible with an effective
inhibition of the ACE. In contrast, the PRA profile of dogs treated
with low-dose enalapril did not differ from that obtained from dogs
treated with nitroglycerin alone. Although low-dose
enalapril significantly inhibited the Ang I pressor response 2 hours
after dosing, the chosen concentration apparently still was too small
to cause a continuous inhibition of the ACE for a 12-hour period.
Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that a persistent inhibition of
the Ang II formation might be a prerequisite for the observed
beneficial effects of high-dose enalapril on tolerance development
and rebound. Furthermore, the demonstration of positive effects of ACE
inhibitors, even in the absence of a functional sulfhydryl
group, suggests that in agreement with previous observations,
sulfhydryl group depletion is not the decisive mechanism responsible
for nitrate tolerance.15 16 37 38
Study Limitations
The results of this study may be limited by the observation that
attenuation of the coronary effects of
nitroglycerin is observed with high-dose enalapril
only over the 5-day test period. The slope of the curves does not
suggest a plateau effect but may suggest that "full tolerance"
might have been reached within a few more days. Furthermore, the
effective enalapril concentration was on a
milligram-per-body-weight basis that was rather large
compared with conventional human dosing. Similarly, the
nitroglycerin concentration required to cause a maximal
dilation of large coronary arteries in dogs is threefold larger
compared with concentrations required to maximally dilate human
coronary arteries.39 Therefore, it seems difficult
to extrapolate the relevance of drug doses between different species,
especially when body surface areas are different.
Conflicting Role of ACE Inhibitors in Nitrate
Tolerance
Although the data presented indicate a positive effect of
ACE inhibition on tolerance and rebound, the existing literature
concerning the usefulness of ACE inhibitors in preventing
tolerance is quite contradictory. Although several groups reported that
ACE inhibition reversed tolerance or prevented the development of
tolerance when given concomitantly with
nitroglycerin,37 40 41 other groups failed
to reproduce these observations.42 43 Although it is
almost impossible to explain the different efficacies of ACE
inhibitors in these particular studies in preventing or
reversing tolerance, it is quite possible that, for example, the use of
higher concentrations of ACE inhibitors may have influenced
the different outcomes of these studies.40 42
Clinical Implications
The data presented may have important clinical
implications. Rebound constriction of large coronary arteries
may represent a potential mechanism responsible for
recurrence of angina pectoris symptoms during
nitroglycerin withdrawal periods in patients with
stable or unstable angina and may explain the angina symptoms in and
sudden deaths of munition workers. Withdrawal symptoms after nitrate
therapy have been observed in patients treated with nitrates
alone,24 whereas concomitant ß-blocker therapy
prevented postnitroglycerin rebound,44
probably by attenuating the nitroglycerin-induced
hypersensitivity to catecholamines. These findings,
together with our recent observations in animal studies,8
encourage the standard practice of treating angina with a combination
of long-acting nitrates and a ß-blocker. Furthermore, the
impressive positive effects of enalapril on tolerance and rebound favor
a combination therapy of nitrates and ß-blockers with high rather
than low doses of ACE inhibitors; however, this issue has
to be addressed by well-designed clinical research trials.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 17, 1995; revision received October 20, 1995; accepted November 9, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J. Knot Nitrate Tolerance in Hypertension: New Insight Into a Century-Old Problem Circ. Res., October 31, 2003; 93(9): 799 - 801. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gori and J. D. Parker The Puzzle of Nitrate Tolerance: Pieces Smaller Than We Thought? Circulation, October 29, 2002; 106(18): 2404 - 2408. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. T. McGrath, L. Dixon, D. R. Morgan, and G. E. McVeigh Production of 8-epi prostaglandin F2{alpha} in human platelets during administration of organic nitrates J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 21, 2002; 40(4): 820 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hebert and J. Y. T. Lam Nitroglycerin rebound associated with vascular, rather than platelet, hypersensitivity J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2000; 36(7): 2311 - 2316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Munzel, H. Mollnau, M. Hartmann, C. Geiger, M. Oelze, A. Warnholtz, A. H. Yehia, U. Forstermann, and T. Meinertz Effects of a nitrate-free interval on tolerance, vasoconstrictor sensitivity and vascular superoxide production J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2000; 36(2): 628 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kurz, U. Hink, G. Nickenig, A. B. Borthayre, D. G. Harrison, and T. Munzel Evidence for a Causal Role of the Renin-Angiotensin System in Nitrate Tolerance Circulation, June 22, 1999; 99(24): 3181 - 3187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Weightman, N. M. Gibbs, M. R. Sheminant, E. G. Whitford, B. D. Mahon, and M. A. J. Newman Drug Therapy Before Coronary Artery Surgery: Nitrates Are Independent Predictors of Mortality and {beta}-Adrenergic Blockers Predict Survival Anesth. Analg., February 1, 1999; 88(2): 286 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. A. Caramori, A. G. Adelman, E. R. Azevedo, G. E. Newton, A. B. Parker, and J. D. Parker Therapy with nitroglycerin increases coronary vasoconstriction in response to acetylcholine J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1998; 32(7): 1969 - 1974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Watanabe, M. Kakihana, S. Ohtsuka, and Y. Sugishita Preventive effects of carvedilol on nitrate tolerance--a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study between carvedilol and arotinolol J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1201 - 1206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zanzinger, J. Czachurski, and H. Seller Impaired Modulation of Sympathetic Excitability by Nitric Oxide After Long-term Administration of Organic Nitrates in Pigs Circulation, June 16, 1998; 97(23): 2352 - 2358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Watanabe, M. Kakihana, S. Ohtsuka, and Y. Sugishita Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Ascorbate on the Preventive Effect of Nitrate Tolerance in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure Circulation, March 10, 1998; 97(9): 886 - 891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Parker and J. O. Parker Nitrate Therapy for Stable Angina Pectoris N. Engl. J. Med., February 19, 1998; 338(8): 520 - 531. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Watanabe, M. Kakihana, S. Ohtsuka, and Y. Sugishita Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Supplemental Vitamin E on Attenuation of the Development of Nitrate Tolerance Circulation, October 21, 1997; 96(8): 2545 - 2550. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hebert, J.-X. Xiang, and J. Y.T. Lam Persistent Inhibition of Platelets During Continuous Nitroglycerin Therapy Despite Hemodynamic Tolerance Circulation, March 4, 1997; 95(5): 1308 - 1313. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||