| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1996;93:1981-1992.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Scottish MONICA Project: Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit (H.T.-P., M.W.) (Scottish MONICA Coordinating Centre and WHO MONICA Quality Control Centre for Event Registration), University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, and the Glasgow MONICA Project Centre (C.M., B.F., G.W.), Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Correspondence to Professor Hugh Tunstall-Pedoe, Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK. E-mail h.tunstall-pedoe@dundee.ac.uk.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Age-standardized data from 3991 episodes of nonfatal definite myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in men (mean age, 55.5 years) were compared with 1551 in women (57.0 years). Many results, such as the overall 28-day fatality rates of 49.8% in men and 48.5% in women, showed insignificant differences. However, 74.3% of deaths in men occurred out of hospital versus 67.8% in women (P=.0004). After admission to hospital, fatality rates in women were 14% higher (P=.07) and after admission to coronary care, 22% higher (P=.04). Women were more often widowed. Fewer had a history of previous myocardial infarction, but the prevalence of angina pectoris, of smoking, and of chest pain in the attack was the same as in men; more had shock, syncope, and breathlessness. More consulted a doctor before admission to hospital, which delayed their coming under care. More men had ECG Q-wave progression, and more women had smaller ECG changes. This, and marginally reduced chances of direct admission to coronary care, of thrombolysis, of aspirin, and of ß-blockers, did not explain women's excess hospital fatality.
Conclusions Acute coronary events appear to be recognized and treated fairly equally in men and women 25 to 64 years old in Glasgow, so differences are small but subtle. More men die suddenly out of hospital; the reason why more women die after arrival may be because the equivalent number of men have already died outside.
Key Words: sex coronary disease mortality epidemiology myocardial infarction
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent studies of angina pectoris suggest unequal investigation and intervention in women compared with men,2 3 4 5 6 despite angina being more evenly prevalent in the two sexes than is the incidence of acute events.7 8 These findings are complicated by the different clinical spectrum and diagnostic probabilities in women,1 4 9 but they raise questions about myocardial infarction and coronary deaths. Are acute events similar in men and women? Are emergency treatment and investigation equal or unequal?
Previous attempts at comparison have encountered problems. Smaller numbers of events in women lead to imprecision. Older age and more risk factors confound the analyses,10 11 12 13 14 15 16 as may failure to recognize mild attacks, so that cases in women appear more severe.17 18 19 20 Results of studies have been inconsistent.21 22 23 24 25 26 27
The World Health Organization (WHO) MONICA Project, and in particular the Scottish center based in the north of Glasgow city, is well placed to explore these questions. Thousands of coronary events are being investigated and coded over a period of 10 years to investigate disease trends in men and women <65 years old.19 The study covers all recognized fatal and nonfatal events in defined communities, both inside and outside the hospital. To ensure the stability of registration of events over time, strict diagnostic criteria and quality assurance procedures are laid down, monitored from the WHO Quality Control Centre for Event Registration in Dundee, Scotland, which also coordinates Scottish MONICA. The Scottish MONICA center in Glasgow has the highest female coronary event rates of all the centers; has scored well for the quality, completeness, and consistency of its data within the international study; and has recorded medical care data on all events continuously from 1985, rather than just periodically, as the original WHO MONICA protocol demanded.
What follows is a comparison of acute coronary events in men and women 25 to 64 years old from the first 7 years of the project, 1985 through 1991. The setting, chosen for its high event rates, is an inner-city area with a high degree of social and material deprivation, served by several large university and other hospitals providing free emergency care through the Scottish Health Service. Compared with North America, the level of invasive interventions in myocardial infarction is low, but during the years concerned, drug therapy was changing rapidly through involvement in and implementation of large, randomized, controlled trials.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients and relatives are not interviewed directly. The data are all obtained after the event, in a standardized manner, from written records at second hand, a method we have labeled "cold pursuit," in distinction to the obtaining of data from inpatients, or "hot pursuit," practiced in earlier British studies and elsewhere.29 30 Register procedures and access to data were approved by the relevant committee. Personal identification needed for record linkage is stored on a computer separate from that used for medical information.
Diagnostic Criteria
Diagnostic criteria and coding rules are based on
the WHO MONICA Manual,31 extended by many additional items
in the Glasgow MONICA Manual of Operations (unpublished). Data items
are subjected to range and logic checks and a diagnostic
algorithm and are entered on the Dundee University computer, from which
core data are sent for the international study to the MONICA Data
Centre in Helsinki, where many checks, as well as the
diagnostic algorithms, are rerun, reinforcing the local
quality assurance procedures. Rigorous efforts are made to prevent and
detect changes in coding over time and thereby to confirm that any
apparent trends detected are genuine.
MONICA definitions are summarized here, since full details have been published.19 31
Each event is defined as potentially lasting no longer than 28 days. After that time it can be classified as fatal or nonfatal, and results of investigations accruing in that time are used for diagnosis. A recorded history of myocardial infarction more than 28 days previously in the same individual determines whether the index event is first or recurrent.
The major nonfatal end point for the study is "definite" myocardial infarction. Cases failing to meet the criteria are classified as "possible" (with prolonged pain of myocardial ischemia but test results short of infarction) or "no" myocardial infarction. For a case to be coded as definite nonfatal myocardial infarction, there must be unequivocal serial ECG progression (defined by the Minnesota codes) during the attack or specific combinations of symptoms and ECG findings, with cardiac enzyme levels exceeding twice the upper limit of normal. (The latter varied by hospital and over time but could be any or all of creatine phosphokinase, hydroxybutyric dehydrogenase, aspartate transaminase, or their isoenzymes.)
Fatal events are categorized as "definite," "possible," "unclassifiable" (if no relevant diagnostic information is available for or against the diagnosis), and "no myocardial infarction or coronary death." Definite fatal events have had diagnostic confirmation in life or autopsy evidence of myocardial infarction or coronary thrombosis. Possible fatal events have chronic occlusive coronary disease at autopsy, a past history of coronary heart disease, or suggestive symptoms before death in the absence of evidence for a competing cause of death.
For this analysis, cases have been included that satisfied criteria for the main WHO MONICA diagnostic grouping, definition 1.19 This includes definite, possible, and unclassifiable coronary deaths as well as nonfatal definite myocardial infarction. In particular, it should be noted that nonfatal episodes that failed the diagnostic criteria for definite infarction (the nonfatal possibles), which make up a large proportion of coronary admissions, are not included.
Statistical Procedures
The tables compare percentage frequencies of findings for the
events in men with those in women. Because the age distribution of
events in the two sexes is slightly different (Table 1
),
the uncorrected percentages are not directly comparable, although they
are valid within each sex. To avoid the need to recalculate figures for
both sexes to another standard, the percentage figure for women alone
is reported once in its uncorrected (crude) form and then a second
time, standardized directly to the male age distribution, and displayed
alongside the male percentage for direct comparison.
|
For all tables, unless specified differently, the denominators are 3991 events in men and 1551 events in women; these include all nonfatal and fatal events, including out-of-hospital deaths, first events, and recurrences. To the extent that individuals remaining <65 years old and resident in the study population had more than one coronary event in the period 1985 through 1991, these totals and the following descriptions are of different events but not necessarily of different people.
Log-linear models were used to test differences adjusted for age. Probability (P) values are shown in the tables for each item, to the right for isolated positive responses, but underneath where there are multiple related alternatives whose distribution is analyzed together. In each case, tests were also made for age modification of the sex effect, and the significant (P<.05) results are reported.
The large numbers and standardized methods mean that results are of sufficient precision to indicate which findings show close congruence between the sexes and which show differences large enough to be of both statistical and real significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Table 2
shows the marital and social status of those
affected. There are large and statistically significant differences.
There are three times the percentage of events in widowed women as in
widowed men after age correction. Only one third of the events in men
and one fifth of those in women occurred in those in employment when
afflicted, but for this item the differences by sex increased with age.
In this inner-city, deprived area, few families owned their own
housing, and about one in six victims lived in single-person
households. In almost all of these characteristics, the female victims
were more socially disadvantaged and isolated compared with the men.
More were widowed, living alone and in publicly owned
accommodations.
|
The place of onset of the acute coronary attack reflects the activities of those affected. In >40% of events beginning outside hospital, the exact place of onset was unclear in the clinical records or the person was found dead, and no presumption could be made about whether symptoms had begun elsewhere. When it was recorded, more men had the onset while at work or in a public place, whereas rather more women were affected at home. In the small percentage of cases with onset in hospital (4%), the coronary event could be complicating another reason for the admission.
Medical and Smoking History
Previous history of coronary heart disease or stroke and
smoking habits at the time of the attack are shown in Table 3
. Almost one in two of the men and women registered
with attacks had some previous clinical diagnosis of coronary
heart disease, in which angina pectoris also featured with equal
frequency. Rates of previous myocardial infarction, however, were
significantly different (P<.0001), with about one quarter
of women having such a history versus about one third of men. A history
of stroke was equally common in the two sexes.
|
The Glasgow base population has high (but falling) smoking rates in
both sexes, linked to urban deprivation and a Glasgow
history of tobacco trading and cigarette manufacture.32
For nearly one fifth of coronary victims, usually the
fatalities, smoking information was unavailable from the medical and
medicolegal records, but the proportion of known current smokers
among all coronary victims was nonetheless still remarkably
high and similar at 60% in both sexes, although significant
differences by sex occurred among the percentage of
ex-smokers and other smoking categories. What was smoked also
differed qualitatively and quantitatively, since more men than women
smoked noncigarette tobacco, and more of them also smoked
30
cigarettes a day.
Symptoms and Signs
Table 4
shows the symptoms and signs of the
attack, sudden death outside hospital accounting for almost all the
unknown, absent data. The presence andduration of chest
pain showed no difference betweenthe sexes, but women had
a significantly greater prevalence of what the WHO MONICA
Manualclassified as atypical, additional features.
Althoughpercentages for some items were small, there was
more left ventricular failure (or acute
breathlessness), more shock, and more syncope in women.
Sixty-threepercent of both sexes were classified as
having typicalchest pain without other features, but more
men hadno recorded information on their symptoms and
more women were atypical.
|
Coming Under Care
Medical management is shown in Table 5
. Women are
slightly slower in coming under care than men, but the difference only
just reaches statistical significance (P=.04). Significant
differences are apparent in the routes by which men and women came
under care and in their subsequent management. Relatively more men
tended to go directly to hospital, whereas more women tended to consult
their family (general) practitioner first. For this reason,
time to come under care was reanalyzed by the route of
coming under care and confining the analysis to those who were
still alive at 28 days, since fatal and nonfatal cases are combined in
the main tables. Of those going directly to hospital, 61.1% of men and
59.7% of women were under care at 4 hours from onset, whereas the
figures for those consulting a family practitioner first
were 36.1% and 35.1%, respectively (not significantly different). In
the Glasgow population, therefore, the extra delay in women in coming
under care is explained by their preference for consulting their family
physician. This also explains why a few more were initially managed at
home compared with men and why slightly more were taken to hospital by
ambulance (not shown in table) rather than arriving by other means.
|
Although the differences in percentage terms are not great, those for
management shown in this table reflect importantly on the 28-day
fatality rates associated with hospital and coronary care unit
admission, discussed subsequently in relation to Table 10
. If we
compare the overall total of events in men and women, 4% more women
than men were managed in hospital, whereas the equivalent 4% of events
in men were medically unattended deaths outside, since the victims died
before medical help could arrive. Rather more events in men were
managed initially in a coronary care unit and more in women on
a general medical ward, but the eventual total percentages of men
and women admitted to coronary care and the length of stay
there were indistinguishable.
Investigation and Diagnosis
The MONICA diagnostic categories and the noninvasive
investigations on which they are based are shown in Table 6
. Medically unattended sudden deaths outside
hospital account for both the missing investigations and the male
excess in these, whereas investigation of remaining cases appears to be
consistent across the two sexes.
|
The percentage breakdown of MONICA diagnostic categories resulting from these investigations is similar for some categories but subtly different for others. There is a male excess of definite myocardial infarction in which ECG changes alone were unequivocal and diagnostic (development of new Q waves, or Q-wave progression with ST and T progression). This is more than compensated for in women by an excess of cases, otherwise known as subendocardial myocardial infarction, that satisfied MONICA criteria for definite myocardial infarction through lesser ECG changes accompanied by cardiac enzyme levels exceeding twice the upper limit of normal.
As is implicit in the case mix of MONICA definition 1,19
the possible and unclassifiable cases in the diagnostic
groups were all fatal, whereas definite myocardial infarction includes
both nonfatal and fatal cases. Some fatal cases could be
diagnosed on ECG and cardiac enzyme data obtained before death. The
first three subgroups of definite myocardial infarction (1.1, 1.2, and
1.3) in Table 6
include both fatal and nonfatal cases, whereas the
fourth subgroup plus the possible and unclassifiable cases are all
fatal. Most of the 28-day fatalities in the two sexes arise within
these latter groups, but the first three accounted for 165 (8.3%) of
the deaths in men and 80 (10.4%) of those in women. Within these
categories, the average male case fatality at 28 days was 7.6%,
whereas in women it was consistently higher, averaging 9.3%,
so the excess fatality in hospitalized women was not explained by their
different distribution from men across ECG groups.
Drugs and Interventions
Data on medication and procedures were extracted from hospital
case records, and in fatal cases the Glasgow MONICA Project
staff was able to obtain details of previous medication from
police and general practitioner records. These are the
7-year averages for 1985 through 1991 during a period of rapid change.
Results in Table 7
are, first, for all coronary
events, showing the recorded medication and investigation at or
before the onset; then for medical treatment and invasive investigation
of the attack, the denominator now restricted to medically attended
cases (omitting unattended sudden death); and the third section showing
medication and planned procedures at hospital discharge of survivors.
Numbers and percentages of positives are given, data being recorded
as unobtainable (not shown) in only 1% to 2% of cases for almost all
items. Female percentages have been age-standardized to the
equivalent male group.
|
Before the onset of the attack, drug usage was rather higher in women for several items, most notably diuretics. Cardiac procedure rates were low, but coronary angiography, bypass graft surgery, and coronary angioplasty rates had been marginally higher in the men. During the event, drug usage was remarkably similar in the two sexes, most items showing no significant difference, although the key drugs studied in randomized, controlled trials in the 1980saspirin, thrombolytic drugs, and ß-blockerswere all used marginally more frequently in men. Again, procedure rates are low, with generally marginal excesses in men.
At discharge, most drug items show no significant difference between the sexes. Of 12 drug classes, 6 were used more often and 6 less often in women. Rates for procedures continuing or scheduled at hospital discharge were low, with no significant differences between the sexes.
Cardiac Arrest, Attempted Cardiopulmonary
Resuscitation, and Death
Analysis of the available data on cardiac arrest and
resuscitation attempts is shown in Table 8
.
Consistent with what has been described already, more cardiac
arrests occurred in men outside hospital and more in women after
arrival in hospital. Adding the percentages for arrests in and out of
hospital in men gives the same total as that for women (52.2% versus
51.8%). Recorded attempts at resuscitation out of hospital were
made in 27.0% of arrests in men and (age-standardized) 26.9% for
women. In hospital, the percentages were 77.6% for men and
(age-standardized) 73.4% for women. Most out-of-hospital
arrests occurred at or around the onset of the attack, but a tiny
minority occurred between hospital discharge and 28 days.
|
Certain details of fatalities are compared in Table 9
.
Denominators for this table are totals of deaths at 28 days, and the
age standardization is to the male distribution of deaths. Details of
the place of death contrast with the place of onset shown in Table 2
.
There are far fewer unknowns, but again, more events in men than in
women are related to public places and to place of work. Some 25.7% of
male deaths were attributed to hospital locations, whereas the
proportion in women after age standardization was 32.7%, despite their
greater delay in reaching hospital. Coding of this item was to the
place of initial fatal collapse, not of certification of death.
According to MONICA coding rules, therefore, unsuccessful resuscitation
attempts could not change the recorded time and place of
death.31
|
The proportion of witnessed deaths was similar in the two sexes, even though more women lived alone. This is explained by survival times. Despite difficulties of estimation and a considerable amount of missing data, significantly larger proportions of women than men lived more than 1 hour and more than 24 hours from the onset, whereas many more men than women were recorded as surviving <1 hour. This is reflected in the subsequent investigation of the deaths. The more sudden nature of deaths in men and the greater number occurring outside hospital meant that more male deaths were investigated by the medicolegal authority, although the proportion of deaths in the two sexes subjected to medicolegal or hospital autopsies seems to have been the same.
Case Fatality in the Community and by Hospital and Coronary
Unit Admission
Earlier tables have compared the community perspective of
coronary events in men and women regardless of whether they
reached hospital. Table 10
summarizes the overall
results but also shows the 28-day case fatality rates in relation to
hospital admission and coronary care.
Community case fatality rates at 28 days are the same in men and women, but more women reached hospital alive in the attack, so that 74.3% of male deaths occurred outside hospital versus 67.8% (age-standardized) in women (P=.0004). This explains why 67.3% of women reached hospital and were admitted versus 63.3% of men (P=.005). The 28-day case fatality of those admitted to hospital was 13% higher in women than in men after age standardization (24.1% versus 21.4%, P=.07), whereas outcomes for coronary care unit admission showed a 22% disparity (19.3% versus 15.9%, P=.04).
The proportion of first attacks is different in the two sexes, but this does not seem to affect the community case fatality result. For first attacks alone, the figure is 48.5% for both sexes, indistinguishable from each other and from those found in all events (49.8% in men and 48.5% in women). The influence of whether attacks were first or recurrent on other potential findings is beyond the scope of this article.
The better hospital survival rates of men compared with women appears to be associated with equal and opposite differential survival outside hospital before admission. Male sex is associated with sudden death out of hospital and female sex with delayed death in hospital, but the overall fatality rates from onset to 28 days are indistinguishable in this large, carefully assembled case series.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Validity and Generalizability of Glasgow MONICA Population
Findings
The Glasgow MONICA population is not typical of the United
Kingdom, or even of Scotland, because it was chosen in the early 1980s
as a high-coronary-mortality population in the west of
Scotland. Comparison with other populations, such as Edinburgh to the
east, suggests that much of the geographical gradient in mortality
correlates with socioeconomic disadvantage.34 35 The area
of Glasgow, although not typical of the country, shares many features
with a number of postindustrial conurbations in the northern
hemisphere, which grew on heavy industry in the smokestack era, then
lost traditional employment, and are now starting new industries.
Glasgow is populated by a mixture of descendants of lowland Scots and Celts from the Highlands and Islands and from Ireland, just across the Irish Sea. The ethnic diversity of what was a major trading port includes substantial additions in this century of Ashkenazi Jews, Italians, Poles, Chinese, and South Asians. Although Glasgow MONICA was the only MONICA population in the first risk-factor survey to achieve sexual equality in its (high) prevalence of cigarette smoking,36 attitudes toward women remain fairly traditional. However, society is changing, and Glasgow medical school recruited equal numbers of men and women students from the early 1960s on.
The Scottish Health Service follows a pattern similar to that of the rest of the United Kingdom in providing medical care free at the point of delivery, based on domiciliary care delivered through family practitioners by office and home visits, and through hospital consultants providing in-patient care and specialist hospital clinics. All acute-care hospitals in Glasgow have coronary care facilities, but these can be overstretched so that, through nonavailability of beds or atypical presentation, patients can be admitted on arrival to the general wards. From mid-1990 on, near the end of the period reported, all emergency ambulances in Glasgow were equipped with semiautomatic defibrillators.37 Before that, mobile coronary care was not generally available.38 Angiography, angioplasty, and coronary bypass surgery rates in acute myocardial infarction are low in Britain, where they have not previously been considered to be of proven value, and the system of funding discourages expensive interventions. However, in keeping with the pioneering British role in this area, Glasgow cardiologists are in the forefront of carrying out and acting on the results from randomized, controlled trials of drugs.
An important characteristic of the west of Scotland in the 1980s was its high mortality rates for a number of diseases, particularly in women. In the cross-sectional comparison of coronary event rates in WHO MONICA centers, out of 38 centers worldwide Glasgow MONICA had the third highest male event rates from 1985 through 1987 and the highest female rates by a large margin.19 Data (awaiting publication) from 1988 through 1990 give it both the highest female and the highest male rates, because male rates in Finnish centers had fallen further.
The Glasgow MONICA population is well placed to provide large numbers of events in women for analysis. Could results be distorted both by the factors generating the high event rates and by the high event rates themselves? We think not. Men and women are evenly distributed across populations, and consistent differences between them should be apparent in our population. Correction is needed only for age. Glasgow may avoid bias present elsewhere. When a disease is underrecognized, it tends to be the more severe cases that are diagnosed. The WHO MONICA Project has shown that case fatality is higher for women in populations in which coronary disease rates are low.19 The event rate for women in Glasgow exceeds that of the men in southern European populations. The disease in women should be better recognized than elsewhere.
Missed and "silent" cases are beyond the reach of disease registers and can be identified only from longitudinal cohort studies with regular ECG follow-up. They make up a substantial percentage of events in men,39 and the Framingham study suggested an even larger percentage in women.7 In Glasgow, the community case fatality and other indicators suggest that the case mix in men and women is similar, although the proportion of missed cases in the two sexes can only be guessed at.
Once a case is picked up from the hospital discharge or death certificate, the Glasgow MONICA registration staff follows a highly standardized procedure for extracting and coding the information and for deriving the diagnosis. In particular, the Minnesota coding of the ECG is carried out by observers independently of each other and of the case notes. The MONICA ECG code and the MONICA diagnosis are provided by a computer algorithm.
Contribution to the Evidence on How Men and Women
Differ
Our findings build on earlier studies but, by incorporating
out-of-hospital sudden deaths, place them in a new perspective.
For many characteristics in the two sexes, we have shown that there are
no significant differences. Where we have found differences, we have
been able to quantify these with precision. The differences are subtle
but of considerable importance. The community perspective shows that
the worse in-hospital mortality encountered by women compared with
men is compensated for by advantages over men before arrival.
Women do appear to have a rather worse prognosis in hospital, but
this may be because the equivalent number of men have already died
suddenly before reaching hospital.
Evidence that these findings on sex differences are not unique to Glasgow MONICA comes from data on the 38 WHO MONICA populations.19 In 29 of the 36 populations able to provide comparable data for men and women, the percentage of deaths in men that apparently occurred within 1 hour of onset was greater than the percentage in women; in 2 it was the same, and in only 5 was it smaller. The pooled data also show a higher proportion of fatal cases in women than in men with ECG and enzyme tests before death who survived long enough to come under care.
Although some studies have not reported higher fatality in women from
coronary events,21 24 most have done so,
particularly those that reported on hospital admissions. They have
shown great variation in whether they attributed the worse outcome to
age alone11 15 or to combinations of risk
factors,10 12 13 16 26 or concluded that sex was a risk
factor in itself14 17 18 20 22 25 27 either from an
inherent difference between the sexes or from underrecognition of
milder attacks in women. Differences in reported risk between men and
women have been very considerable in different studies. By excluding
patients >65 years old and by age standardization using 5-year age
groups, we have shown that the excess mortality in women in hospital
still remains significant, although it is not very great. In our data,
we have found a significantly greater prevalence of shock, syncope, and
left ventricular failure in women under care (Table 4
) but
not enough to explain the excess of hospital deaths. We have also found
a significantly greater prevalence of nonQ-wave infarction in women
(Table 6
), but the excess female mortality extends across all of our
MONICA ECG categories.
Are Women Different, Are They Treated Differently, or Do They
Behave Differently?
In a country with many traditional, although changing, attitudes
toward women, we have found possible evidence of differences from men
in investigation and treatment but large numbers of categories in which
there were none. Numbers of ECGs and enzyme tests recorded after
admission were similar in men and women, as was most medication before,
during, and after the attack; the proportion eventually admitted to
coronary care; and the length of stay there. Relatively more
men were admitted directly to coronary care, possibly as a
result of different ECG findings on admission. Also, during 7 years of
rapid change, marginally lower percentages of women were recorded
as having received aspirin, ß-blockers, and
thrombolytics during the attack, although women had
more of some other drugs. The more invasive investigations and
interventions were more common in men, and in some cases this reached
statistical significance. However, in most cases these procedures were
so uncommon, even in men, that the differences were not significant or
able to influence survival rates. Resuscitation was attempted equally
commonly in arrests outside hospital but was recorded marginally
less commonly with arrests in women in hospital. We do not know the
clinical circumstances. Our findings on drug usage are
consistent with those from Worcester, Mass,23 in
showing small, nonsignificant differences in the same directions and
show less potential bias than other studies from
Britain.14 40 Revascularization
procedures in myocardial infarction were too infrequent to test whether
there are differences between the sexes, as has been investigated in
Worcester.41
Women took longer to reach hospital during an attack, but the difference was small and was explained in Glasgow by their preference for consulting the family physician, whom they knew, in preference to going directly to hospital. This preference has long been recognized by medical sociologists.42
The picture presented in the Glasgow population is one in which acute coronary events are so common in both men and women that they are recognized and treated very similarly, and the case mix and severity mix appear to be similar. This case mix is determined partly by what cases come forward for medical care and are recognized and partly by the WHO MONICA criteria for myocardial infarction. Relatively more cases of nonfatal possible myocardial infarction (not included in WHO MONICA definition 1) occur in women compared with men. Large numbers of these events were registered in the Glasgow MONICA population but are not included in this article. A more inclusive set of diagnostic criteria would have lowered the case fatality in both sexes but more so in women than in men, giving women a comparative advantage.19 43 The more specific WHO MONICA diagnostic criteria for nonfatal infarction account for the community case fatality of 50% currently observed, compared with that recorded in the earlier WHO Myocardial Infarction registers of 35% to 40% when nonfatal possibles were included.43 44 They partly explain the high 28-day fatality rates in both sexes in hospitalized cases in Glasgow, but these still remain inexplicably higher than those from many reported hospital series and from other MONICA centers despite equivalent care.
The less typical symptoms and less classic ECGs in women may have delayed admission to coronary care, but some bias in the decision to admit from the emergency room to coronary care cannot be totally excluded. Although for some items women fared less well than men, these small differences in the management of women should not have made a significant contribution to hospital survival, since in the bulk of cases and in most respects their management was similar to that of men.
One significant item in the comparison of male and female victims is
the greater social and material deprivation of women. The
large number of widows in Glasgow, even in women below age 65 years, is
related to the high premature death rates in both sexes, but the
results in Table 2
are supported by other unpublished data from
Scottish MONICA and the Scottish Heart Health Study in showing a
greater social gradient of coronary risk for women than for
men.
Fate of Women Compared With Men
The conclusion of this study is that women below age 65 years
hospitalized with myocardial infarction have a higher 28-day fatality
rate than do men, even after correction for differences in age. They
have a greater number of atypical features, take slightly longer to
reach hospital, and have more subendocardial infarction, but none of
these factors appear to account entirely for their worse mortality
experience after admission.
The most plausible explanation that we have found is that women have a differential survival pattern. They appear to be relatively better protected than men from sudden death outside hospital, so that the excess of deaths in men occurs before admission and the equivalent excess in women after. Although it is impossible to prove that the female deaths in hospital are those deaths that would have occurred in men had they reached hospital alive, the agreement in overall 28-day fatality rates is quite remarkable.
The implications of these observations may be that we should be looking for out-of-hospital factors to explain what happens in hospital to men and women. The factors that protect against sudden death in a coronary attack need to be better understood to protect the men. Conversely, we also need to know whether properly applied coronary care is widening or narrowing the survival difference between hospitalized myocardial infarction in men and women. Here we have presented 7 years of pooled data during an era of rapid therapeutic change. The 10-year data collection from the Glasgow MONICA population, now coming to completion, will provide an answer on differential trends.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 18, 1995; revision received November 15, 1995; accepted November 19, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Kee F, Gaffney B, Currie S, O'Reilly D. Access to coronary catheterisation: fair shares for all? BMJ. 1993;307:1305-1307.
3. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:221-225. [Abstract]
4. Wenger NK. Gender, coronary artery disease, and coronary bypass surgery. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:557-558.
5. Tobin JN, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Wexler JP, Steingart RM, Budner N, Lense L, Wachspress J. Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:19-25.
6. Khan SS, Nessim S, Gray R, Czer LS, Chaux A, Matloff J. Increased mortality of women in coronary bypass surgery: evidence for referral bias. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:561-567.
7. Lerner DJ, Kannel WB. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26 year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J. 1986;111:383-390. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Smith WCS, Kenicer MB, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Clark EC,
Crombie IK. Prevalence of coronary heart disease in
Scotland: Scottish Heart Health Study. Br Heart J. 1990;64:295-298.
9. Kennedy JW, Killip T, Fisher LD, Alderman EL, Gillespie MJ, Mock MB. The clinical spectrum of coronary artery disease and its surgical and medical management, 1974-1979: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). Circulation. 1982;66(suppl III):III-16-III-23.
10.
Fiebach NH, Viscoll CM, Horwitz RI. Differences
between women and men in survival after myocardial infarction: biology
or methodology? JAMA. 1990;263:1092-1096.
11. Dittrich A, Gilpin E, Nicod P, Cali G, Henning H, Ross J. Acute myocardial infarction in women: influence of gender on mortality and prognostic variables. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62:1-7. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
White HD, Barbash GI, Modan M, Simes J, Diaz R,
Hampton JR, Heikkila J, Kristinsson A, Moulopoulos S, Paolasso EAC, Van
der Verf T, Pehrsson K, Sandoe E, Wilcox RG, Verstraete M, von der
Lippe G, Van de Werf F, and the Investigators of the International
Tissue Plasminogen Activator/Streptokinase
Mortality Study. After correcting for worse baseline characteristics,
women treated with thrombolytic therapy for acute
myocardial infarction have the same mortality and morbidity as men
except for a higher incidence of hemorrhagic stroke.
Circulation. 1993;88:2097-2103.
13. Lincoff AM, Califf RM, Ellis SG, Sigmon KN, Lee KL, Leimberger JD, Topol EJ, and the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Thrombolytic therapy for women with myocardial infarction: is there a gender gap? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1780-1787. [Abstract]
14.
Wilkinson P, Laji K, Ranjadayalan K, Parsons L, Timmis
AD. Acute myocardial infarction in women: survival
analysis in the first six months. BMJ. 1994;309:566-569.
15. Karlson BW, Herlizt J, Hartford M. Prognosis in myocardial infarction in relation to gender. Am Heart J. 1994;128:477-483. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Gottlieb S, Moss AJ, McDermott M, Eberly S. Comparison of posthospital survival after acute myocardial infarction in women and men. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:727-730. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Puletti M, Sunseri L, Curione M, Erba SM, Borgia C. Acute myocardial infarction: sex-related differences in prognosis. Am Heart J. 1984;108:63-66. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
He J, Klag MJ, Whelton PK, Yuchang Z, Xinzhi W.
Short and long-term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction in
Chinese men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139:693-703.
19.
WHO MONICA Project, prepared by Tunstall-Pedoe H,
Kuulasmaa K, Amouyel P, Arveiler D, Rajakangas A-M, Pajak A.
Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the World Health
Organization MONICA Project: registration procedures, event rates
and case-fatality rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in four
continents. Circulation. 1994;90:583-612.
20. Demirovic J, Blackburn H, McGovern PG, Luepker R, Sprafka JM, Gilbertson D. Sex differences in early mortality after acute myocardial infarction (the Minnesota Heart Survey). Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:1096-1101. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Weinblatt E, Shapiro S, Frank CW. Prognosis of
women with newly diagnosed coronary heart disease: a comparison
with the course of the disease among men. Am J Public
Health. 1973;63:577-593.
22.
Greenland P, Reicher-Reiss H, Goldbourt U, Behar S, and
the Israeli SPRINT Investigators. In-hospital and 1-year mortality
in 1524 women after myocardial infarction: comparison with 4315 men.
Circulation. 1991;83:484-491.
23.
Pagley PR, Yarzebski J, Goldberg R, Chen Z, Chirboga D,
Dalen P, Gurwitz J, Alpert JS, Gore JM. Gender differences in
the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:625-629.
24.
Orencia A, Bailey K, Yawn BP, Kottke TE. Effect
of gender on long-term outcome of angina pectoris and myocardial
infarction/sudden unexpected death. JAMA. 1993;269:2392-2397.
25.
Goff DC, Ramsey DJ, Labarthe DR, Nichaman MZ.
Greater case-fatality after myocardial infarction among Mexican
Americans and women than among non-Hispanic whites and men: the Corpus
Christi Heart Project. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139:474-483.
26. Funk M, Griffey KA. Relation of gender to the use of cardiac procedures in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:1170-1173. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Becker RC, Terrin M, Ross R, Knatterud GL,
Desvigne-Nickens P, Gore JM, Braunwald E, and the
Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Investigators.
Comparison of clinical outcomes for women and men after acute
myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:638-645.
28. Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Blackburn H. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiographic Findings: Standards and Procedures for Measurement and Classification. Boston, Mass: John Wright; 1982.
29. Tunstall-Pedoe H. Problems with criteria and quality control in the registration of coronary events in the MONICA Study. Acta Med Scand. 1988;suppl 728:17-25.
30. Tunstall-Pedoe H. Diagnosis, measurement and surveillance of coronary events. Int J Epidemiol. 1989;18:S169-S173. [Abstract]
31. WHO MONICA Project. MONICA Manual (Revised Edition). Geneva, Switzerland: Cardiovascular Diseases Unit, World Health Organization; 1990.
32. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Smith WCS, Crombie IK, Tavendale R. Coronary risk factors and lifestyle variation across Scotland: results from the Scottish Heart Health Study. Scott Med J. 1989;34:556-560. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. WHO MONICA Project, prepared by Tunstall-Pedoe H. The World Health Organization MONICA Project (Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease): a major international collaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41:105-113. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Crombie IK, Smith WCS, Tavendale R, Tunstall-Pedoe
H. Geographical clustering of risk factors and lifestyle for
coronary heart disease in the Scottish Heart Health
Study. Br Heart J. 1990;64:199-203.
35.
Watt GCM, Ecob R. Mortality in Glasgow and
Edinburgh: a paradigm of inequality in health. J
Epidemiol Community Health. 1992;46:498-505.
36. The WHO MONICA Project. A worldwide monitoring system for cardiovascular disease. In: World Health Statistics Annual 1989. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1989:27-149.
37.
Leslie WS, Fitzpatrick B, Morrison CE, Watt GCM,
Tunstall-Pedoe H. Out of hospital cardiac arrest due to
coronary heart disease: a comparison of survival before and
after the introduction of defibrillators in ambulances.
Heart. 1996;75:195-199.
38.
Fitzpatrick B, Watt CGM, Tunstall-Pedoe H.
Potential impact of emergency intervention on sudden death for
coronary heart disease in Glasgow. Br Heart
J. 1992;67:250-254.
39. Grimm RH, Tillinghast S, Daniels K, Neaton JD, Mascioli S, Crow R, Pritzker M, Prineas RJ. Unrecognised myocardial infarction: experience in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). Circulation. 1987;75(suppl II):II-6-II-8.
40.
Clarke KW, Gray D, Keating NA, Hampton JR. Do
women with acute myocardial infarction receive the same treatment as
men? BMJ. 1994;309:563-566.
41. Chiriboga DE, Yarzebski J, Goldberg RJ, Chen Z, Gurwitz J, Gore JM, Alpert JS, Dalen JE. A community-wide perspective of gender differences and temporal trends in the use of diagnostic and revascularization procedures for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:268-273. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Cartwright A. Patients and Their Doctors: A Study of General Practice. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1967.
43.
Tunstall-Pedoe H. Uses of coronary heart
attack registers. Br Heart J. 1978;40:510-515.
44. Myocardial Infarction Community Registers. Public Health in Europe No. 5. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 1976.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K P Champney, P D Frederick, H Bueno, S Parashar, J Foody, C N B Merz, J G Canto, J H Lichtman, V Vaccarino, and for the NRMI Investigators The joint contribution of sex, age and type of myocardial infarction on hospital mortality following acute myocardial infarction Heart, June 1, 2009; 95(11): 895 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wang, Y. Wang, B. Weil, A. Abarbanell, J. Herrmann, J. Tan, M. Kelly, and D. R. Meldrum Estrogen receptor {beta} mediates increased activation of PI3K/Akt signaling and improved myocardial function in female hearts following acute ischemia Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): R972 - R978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N. Zeller, Y. Wang, T. A. Markel, B. Weil, A. Abarbanell, J. L. Herrmann, M. L. Kelly, A. Coffey, and D. R. Meldrum Role of tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 in sex differences of stem cell mediated cardioprotection. Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2009; 87(3): 812 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Norhammar, U Stenestrand, J Lindback, L Wallentin, and on behalf of the Register of Information and Knowl Women younger than 65 years with diabetes mellitus are a high-risk group after myocardial infarction: a report from the Swedish Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admission (RIKS-HIA) Heart, December 1, 2008; 94(12): 1565 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Turnbull, M. Woodward, B. Neal, F. Barzi, T. Ninomiya, J. Chalmers, V. Perkovic, N. Li, S. MacMahon, and the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' C Do men and women respond differently to blood pressure-lowering treatment? Results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2008; 29(21): 2669 - 2680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Andreotti and N. Marchese Women and coronary disease Heart, January 1, 2008; 94(1): 108 - 116. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wang, W. Zhang, P. Crisostomo, T. Markel, K. K. Meldrum, X. Y. Fu, and D. R. Meldrum Sex differences in endothelial STAT3 mediate sex differences in myocardial inflammation Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2007; 293(3): E872 - E877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S P Johnsen, J Videbaek, L Pedersen, R Steffensen, R Videbaek, T Niemann, T T Nielsen, and H T Sorensen Survival trends among Danish patients undergoing coronary angiography for known or suspected ischaemic heart disease: a population based follow up study, 1992-2000 Heart, January 1, 2006; 92(1): 27 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Pitcher, M. Wang, B. M. Tsai, A. Kher, N. T. Nelson, and D. R. Meldrum Endogenous estrogen mediates a higher threshold for endotoxin-induced myocardial protection in females Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): R27 - R33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A-A Fassa, P Urban, D Radovanovic, N Duvoisin, J-M Gaspoz, J-C Stauffer, P Erne, and for the AMIS Plus Investigators Trends in reperfusion therapy of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in Switzerland: six year results from a nationwide registry Heart, July 1, 2005; 91(7): 882 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W Moore, F Kee, A. Evans, E. McCrum-Gardner, C Morrison, and H Tunstall-Pedoe Pre-hospital coronary care and coronary fatality in the Belfast and Glasgow MONICA populations Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2005; 34(2): 422 - 430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Griffith, K Hamilton, J Norrie, and C Isles Early and late mortality after myocardial infarction in men and women: prospective observational study Heart, March 1, 2005; 91(3): 305 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wang, B. M. Tsai, A. Kher, L. B. Baker, G. M. Wairiuko, and D. R. Meldrum Role of endogenous testosterone in myocardial proinflammatory and proapoptotic signaling after acute ischemia-reperfusion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): H221 - H226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G A Lanza Ethnic variations in acute coronary syndromes Heart, June 1, 2004; 90(6): 595 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K H Mak, J D Kark, K S Chia, L L Sim, B H Foong, Z P Ding, R Kam, and S K Chew Ethnic variations in female vulnerability after an acute coronary event Heart, June 1, 2004; 90(6): 621 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rosengren, L. Wallentin, A. K. Gitt, S. Behar, A. Battler, and D. Hasdai Sex, age, and clinical presentation of acute coronary syndromes Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2004; 25(8): 663 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Romo, A. C. K.-B. Amaral, and J.-L. Vincent Effect of Patient Sex on Intensive Care Unit Survival Arch Intern Med, January 12, 2004; 164(1): 61 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. F. Col and S. G. Pauker The Discrepancy between Observational Studies and Randomized Trials of Menopausal Hormone Therapy: Did Expectations Shape Experience? Ann Intern Med, December 2, 2003; 139(11): 923 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Campbell, D K George, S D Robb, R Spooner, T A McDonagh, H J Dargie, and P R Mills The prevalence of haemochromatosis gene mutations in the West of Scotland and their relation to ischaemic heart disease Heart, September 1, 2003; 89(9): 1023 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gruber and S. R. Hanson Factor XI-dependence of surface- and tissue factor-initiated thrombus propagation in primates Blood, August 1, 2003; 102(3): 953 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-M. Herrmann, V. Nicaud, K. Schmidt-Petersen, J. Pfeifer, J. Erdmann, T. McDonagh, H. J. Dargie, M. Paul, and V. Regitz-Zagrosek Angiotensin II type 2 receptor gene polymorphism and cardiovascular phenotypes: the GLAECO and GLAOLD studies Eur J Heart Fail, December 1, 2002; 4(6): 707 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R A Raine, N A Black, T J Bowker, and D A Wood Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease J Epidemiol Community Health, October 1, 2002; 56(10): 791 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Mueller, F.-J. Neumann, H. Roskamm, P. Buser, J. Mc. B. Hodgson, A. P. Perruchoud, and H. J. Buettner Women do have an improved long-term outcome after non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes treated very early and predominantly with percutaneous coronary intervention: A prospective study in 1,450 consecutive patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2002; 40(2): 245 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Harrop, R Donnelly, A Rowbottom, M Holt, and A R Scott Improvements in total mortality and lipid levels after acute myocardial infarction in an English health district (1995-1999) Heart, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 428 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M Dart, X.-J. Du, and B. A Kingwell Gender, sex hormones and autonomic nervous control of the cardiovascular system Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2002; 53(3): 678 - 687. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mehilli, A. Kastrati, J. Dirschinger, J. Pache, M. Seyfarth, R. Blasini, D. Hall, F.-J. Neumann, and A. Schomig Sex-Based Analysis of Outcome in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated Predominantly With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention JAMA, January 9, 2002; 287(2): 210 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Byrne, D Murdoch, C Morrison, and J McMurray An audit of activity and outcome from a daily and a weekly "one stop" rapid assessment chest pain clinic Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2002; 78(915): 43 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kim, C. E. Fahrenbruch, L. A. Cobb, and M. S. Eisenberg Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Men and Women Circulation, November 27, 2001; 104(22): 2699 - 2703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Beckman, J. Ganz, M. A. Creager, P. Ganz, and S. Kinlay Relationship of Clinical Presentation and Calcification of Culprit Coronary Artery Stenoses Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2001; 21(10): 1618 - 1622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. MacIntyre, S. Stewart, S. Capewell, J. W. T. Chalmers, J. P. Pell, J. Boyd, A. Finlayson, A. Redpath, H. Gilmour, and J. J. V. McMurray Gender and survival: a population-based study of 201,114 men and women following a first acute myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2001; 38(3): 729 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Marrugat, M Gil, R Masia, J Sala, R Elosua, J M Anto, and the REGICOR Investigators Role of age and sex in short-term and long term mortality after a first Q wave myocardial infarction J Epidemiol Community Health, July 1, 2001; 55(7): 487 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Macintyre, S. Stewart, J. Chalmers, J. Pell, A. Finlayson, J. Boyd, A. Redpath, J. McMurray, and S. Capewell Relation between socioeconomic deprivation and death from a first myocardial infarction in Scotland: population based analysis BMJ, May 12, 2001; 322(7295): 1152 - 1153. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P.J Schreiner, M Niemela, H Miettinen, M Mahonen, M Ketonen, P Immonen-Raiha, S Lehto, T Vuorenmaa, P Palomaki, H Mustaniemi, et al. Gender differences in recurrent coronary events. The FINMONICA MI register Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2001; 22(9): 762 - 768. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tunstall-Pedoe Comment on the ESC/ACC redefinition of myocardial infarcation by a consensus dissenter Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2001; 22(7): 613 - 615. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tunstall-Pedoe Redefinition of myocardial infarction by a consensus dissenter J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1472 - 1473. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Rosengren, C.-L Spetz, M Koster, N Hammar, L Alfredsson, and M Rosen Sex differences in survival after myocardial infarction in Sweden. Data from the Swedish National Acute Myocardial Infarction register Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2001; 22(4): 314 - 322. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Hanratty, D. A Lawlor, M. B Robinson, R. J Sapsford, D. Greenwood, and A. Hall Sex differences in risk factors, treatment and mortality after acute myocardial infarction: an observational study J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2000; 54(12): 912 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vaccarino, L. F. Berkman, and H. M. Krumholz Long-term Outcome of Myocardial Infarction in Women and Men: A Population Perspective Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2000; 152(10): 965 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Borzak and W. D. Weaver Sex and Outcome After Myocardial Infarction : A Case of Sexual Politics? Circulation, November 14, 2000; 102(20): 2458 - 2459. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Dargie and The CAPRICORN Steering Committee Design and methodology of the CAPRICORN trial -- a randomised double blind placebo controlled study of the impact of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction Eur J Heart Fail, September 1, 2000; 2(3): 325 - 332. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W S Leslie, A Urie, J Hooper, and C E Morrison Delay in calling for help during myocardial infarction: reasons for the delay and subsequent pattern of accessing care Heart, August 1, 2000; 84(2): 137 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Gan, S. K. Beaver, P. M. Houck, R. F. MacLehose, H. W. Lawson, and L. Chan Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction and 30-Day Mortality among Women and Men N. Engl. J. Med., July 6, 2000; 343(1): 8 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rosen, C.-L. Spetz, N. Hammar, P. Greenland, U. Goldbourt, L. Cao, W. Song, D. L. Ornstein, L. R. Zacharski, V. Vaccarino, et al. Coronary Artery Disease in Men and Women N. Engl. J. Med., December 16, 1999; 341(25): 1931 - 1935. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R WILCOX Catheter based treatment for all patients with acute coronary syndromes: is it possible for the UK NHS to cope with this problem? Heart, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 405 - 405. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vaccarino, L. Parsons, N. R. Every, H. V. Barron, H. M. Krumholz, and The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 P Sex-Based Differences in Early Mortality after Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., July 22, 1999; 341(4): 217 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Hochman, J. E. Tamis, T. D. Thompson, W. D. Weaver, H. D. White, F. Van de Werf, P. Aylward, E. J. Topol, R. M. Califf, and The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coro Sex, Clinical Presentation, and Outcome in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes N. Engl. J. Med., July 22, 1999; 341(4): 226 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Capewell, C E Morrison, and J J McMurray Contribution of modern cardiovascular treatment and risk factor changes to the decline in coronary heart disease mortality in Scotland between 1975 and 1994 Heart, April 1, 1999; 81(4): 380 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vaccarino, R. I. Horwitz, T. P. Meehan, M. K. Petrillo, M. J. Radford, and H. M. Krumholz Sex Differences in Mortality After Myocardial Infarction: Evidence for a Sex-Age Interaction Arch Intern Med, October 12, 1998; 158(18): 2054 - 2062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. TUNSTALL-PEDOE Perspectives on trends in mortality and case fatality from coronary heart attacks: the need for a better definition of acute myocardial infarction Heart, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 112 - 113. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J A Volmink, J N Newton, N R Hicks, P Sleight, G H Fowler, and H A W Neil Coronary event and case fatality rates in an English population: results of the Oxford myocardial infarction incidence study Heart, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 40 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K.-T. Khaw, M. D. Nettleman, W. S. Klein, R. Collins, R. Malacrida, and T. Moccetti Comparison of the Early Outcome of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Women and Men N. Engl. J. Med., May 21, 1998; 338(21): 1543 - 1544. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R M N. o. b. o. t. U. K. H. A. S. C. Group Fatality outside hospital from acute coronary events in three British health districts, 1994-5 BMJ, April 4, 1998; 316(7137): 1065 - 1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Chambless, U. Keil, A. Dobson, M. Mahonen, K. Kuulasmaa, A.-M. Rajakangas, H. Lowel, and H. Tunstall-Pedoe Population Versus Clinical View of Case Fatality From Acute Coronary Heart Disease : Results From the WHO MONICA Project 1985–1990 Circulation, December 2, 1997; 96(11): 3849 - 3859. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. McIntyre, C. A. Hamilton, D. D. Rees, J. L. Reid, and A. F. Dominiczak Sex Differences in the Abundance of Endothelial Nitric Oxide in a Model of Genetic Hypertension Hypertension, December 1, 1997; 30(6): 1517 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tunstall-Pedoe, M. Woodward, R. Tavendale, R. A' Brook, and M. K McCluskey Comparison of the prediction by 27 different factors of coronary heart disease and death in men and women of the Scottish heart health study: cohort study BMJ, September 20, 1997; 315(7110): 722 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Maynard, N. R. Every, J. S. Martin, P. J. Kudenchuk, and W. D. Weaver Association of Gender and Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Arch Intern Med, June 23, 1997; 157(12): 1379 - 1384. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Morrison, M. Woodward, W. Leslie, and H. Tunstall-Pedoe Effect of socioeconomic group on incidence of, management of, and survival after myocardial infarction and coronary death: analysis of community coronary event register BMJ, February 22, 1997; 314(7080): 541 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Gender, Cardiac Care, and Outcome: Another Look Journal Watch Women's Health, July 1, 1996; 1996(701): 7 - 7. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |