(Circulation. 1995;92:359-364.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Correspondence to Yoshio Kosakai, MD; National Cardiovascular Center, Fujishirodai 5-7-1, Suita 565, Osaka, Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results To treat AF secondary to cardiac lesions requiring surgery, we combined a modified maze procedure in 101 patients simultaneously undergoing valvular procedures (87), repair of congenital anomalies (12), and other procedures (2), including 24 repeat operations. Duration of AF varied from 0.1 to 30 years (average±SD, 8.8±7.0 years); the f-wave voltage ranged from 0 to 0.45 mV (0.15±0.09 mV); and cardiothoracic ratio varied from 40% to 99% (63±9%). Aortic cross-clamp time varied from 75 to 229 minutes (138±31 minutes), with bypass time ranging from 119 to 326 minutes (217±42 minutes). There were two early deaths (2%), no late deaths, and one episode of transient neurological ischemic attack in follow-up ranging from 1.0 to 3.1 years, for a total of 190 patient-years. Postoperative rhythms were sinus in 83 patients (82%), junctional in 4 (4%), and persistent AF in 14 (14%), each of whom had mitral valve disease. Patients with other underlying pathology had complete recovery of atrial rhythm. A normal-sized A wave was detected in 88% for transtricuspid flow and in 73% for transmitral flow, suggesting concomitant recovery of atrial contraction. Among 36 patients without mechanical valves, 30 (83%) with atrial rhythm and contraction have been taken off anticoagulation therapy, including 10 who are free of all medication.
Conclusions The results suggest that the combined approach is safe, effective, and indicated in patients who are judged capable of tolerating the procedure and likely to regain atrial rhythm.
Key Words: surgery fibrillation embolism survival
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
As for the maze procedure (Table 2
), we
modified Cox's maze 2 procedure (first modification9 ) for
the first 14 patients selected on the basis of high f-wave voltage
and a simpler concomitant procedure. We further modified the maze
atriotomies (Fig 1
) so as not to disrupt
the sinus node artery8 and used cryoablation to simplify
the combined procedure; the current procedure6 was
performed for the last 70 patients referred for surgery on an
unselected basis except for those patients who were judged unable to
tolerate the procedure. Other modifications included transection of the
superior vena cava10 and detachment of the left ventricle
at the circumferential left atriotomy around the pulmonary
veins to improve exposure and manipulation of the mitral valve.
Parallel to the current modification, an additional 17 patients
underwent Cox's maze 3 procedure (Fig 1
, second
modification9 ). All patients had antegrade infusion of St
Thomas' solution (10 mL/kg) every 30 minutes with topical cooling
for myocardial protection.
|
|
Cardiac rhythm was continuously monitored after surgery until stable rhythm returned. Temporary wires were used to pace the patient, to monitor the rhythm, or to overdrive the atrium. Postoperative atrial arrhythmias were treated with DC cardioversion if they were hemodynamically deleterious or not responding to overdrive pacing or antiarrhythmics, usually class I-A. Patients who had such arrhythmias were maintained on antiarrhythmics to suppress triggering effects and to stabilize atrial rhythm before discontinuation of warfarin.
After discharge, patients were followed monthly for adjustment of medication, rhythm, signs of myocardial ischemia, and control of anticoagulation. Doppler echocardiography and chest radiography were scheduled for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Anticoagulation was discontinued only in patients with atrial rhythm and documented contraction 3 to 6 months after reparative surgery. Antiarrhythmics were tapered after anticoagulation was discontinued or after cardiac rhythm was considered stable.
Continuous variables were compared with the use of Student's
t test, and discrete variables were analyzed
with the use of
2 test. Differences were
considered statistically significant at a value of
P<.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Four initial patients required intra-aortic balloon pumping, and 8 underwent reexploration for hemostasis (7) or for relief of late cardiac tamponade (1). Two patients died in the hospital (2%). One of the patients, a 67-year-old woman with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, was extubated 11 days after mitral valve replacement and moved to the general ward, where she developed ventricular tachycardia. After the episode, she deteriorated and died 71 days after surgery. The other patient was a 76-year-old woman who had a long history of congestive failure due to rheumatic heart disease. Although she was extubated 4 days after mitral valve replacement with tricuspid annuloplasty, she was reintubated 1 week later, followed by tracheostomy. She developed AF, pneumonia, and multiple-organ failure and died 93 days after surgery. One transient neurological ischemic attack occurred in a patient who regained sinus rhythm after mechanical mitral valve replacement. Another patient had cerebral bleeding 1 month after mechanical mitral valve replacement. There was no other morbidity or late mortality in the follow-up (range, 1.0 to 3.1 years; mean, 1.92±0.54 years; total, 190 patient-years).
Results were stratified according to the underlying lesions (Table
1
) and surgical modifications of the maze procedure
(Table 2
). The 4 patients with lone AF regained sinus
rhythm after isolated maze procedure. The combined approach was highly
successful in restoring sinus rhythm in congenital anomalies and
acquired lesions other than mitral valve disease, which included the 14
patients with persistent AF after surgery. Excluding the initial 14
selected patients, underlying disorders and results were basically
comparable between the current modification and Cox's maze 3 procedure
except for shorter bypass runs, shorter cardiac arrest, and earlier
appearance of atrial electromechanical activity after the current
modification. Comparison between patients who did and those who did not
regain atrial rhythm (Table 3
) showed
significant differences in duration of AF, incidence of giant left
atrium, preoperative and postoperative left atrial dimensions, and
cardiothoracic ratio.
|
Among 88 patients who had a transthoracic Doppler
study, an atrial A wave was detected in 77 (88%) for transtricuspid
flow and in 64 (73%) for transmitral flow. An A wave was not detected
in 5 patients who regained atrial rhythm. The height of transmitral A
and E waves and their ratio (A/E) were plotted as a function of age
with normal references (Fig 2
).11 Although the
height of
the A wave remained within the normal range after the combined
approach, patients with mitral valve disease had a
higher-than-normal E wave, rendering the A/E ratio
significantly smaller than in age-matched control subjects.
|
Among 36 patients without mechanical valves, anticoagulation with warfarin was discontinued in 30 (83%) who regained both atrial rhythm and contraction; 10 of them became totally free from medication after repair of congenital defects (8) and valvular lesions (2). Warfarin was continued in the remaining 6 (17%) because of persistent AF (5) or no atrial contraction (1). One year after surgery, 29 (29%) were receiving antiarrhythmics, disopyramide (19), quinidine (6), or other medications (6) to suppress premature atrial contraction and paroxysmal atrial flutter.
Selective coronary angiography 1 month after surgery in 21
patients showed no abnormalities around the mitral and tricuspid annuli
where cryoablation was performed (Fig 1
).
Postoperatively, variation of the sinus node artery changed to the
right sinus node artery in 3 patients: 2 from the posterior and 1 from
the left sinus node artery. In later follow-up, no patients
developed signs of myocardial ischemia.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Postoperative persistent AF occurred only in patients with mitral valve disease, whereas the other etiological groups had complete recovery of sinus rhythm, including 4 patients with lone AF during the same period. These results suggest that the differences in recovery and maintenance of atrial rhythm and contraction among reports2 6 derive mainly from underlying cardiac pathology rather than from modification in atriotomies or use of cryoablation. As for the sinus node dysfunction requiring pacemaker implantation, the initial two patients had this requirement after a modified Cox's maze 2 procedure; 14% (2 of 14) required pacemakers, necessitating modification of the atriotomies to the current procedure with the incidence reduced to 2.9% (2 of 70), comparable to that after Cox's maze 3 procedure. Atrial electromechanical activity appeared in the operating room in 69% of patients after the current modification, which was more frequent and earlier than after modified Cox's maze 2 or 3 procedure. This may be due to better preservation of arterial blood supply for the sinus node, although recovery of sinus rhythm eventually became comparable among the three different maze procedures. Although postoperative changes in variation of the sinus node artery (14%, 3 of 21) may indicate disruption of the artery, postoperative surveys for myocardial ischemia have been negative for the complications of cryoablation applied close to the nonperfused coronary arteries.15
Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography failed to detect left atrial contraction in approximately one fourth of the patients who regained electric atrioventricular synchrony. This may be due to fibrotic and calcific degeneration of the atrial myocardium as 85% of our patients had rheumatic or degenerative mitral valve disease. A significantly higher transmitral E wave in these patients suggests relative stenosis or increased impedance across the mitral valve as the result of repair or replacement. Lack of concomitant increase in A-wave,11 or a reduced A/E ratio, may suggest attenuation or absence of physiological compensation11 in patients after combined surgery, presumably due to extensive atriotomies or cardiac denervation.16
As patients had improved hemodynamics14 and exercise capacity after combined approach,16 a reduced incidence of thromboembolism and bleeding complications may become significant in extended long-term follow-up; 30 patients (83% of 36 without mechanical valves) no longer need anticoagulation therapy. These are the objectives1 and advantages2 of the maze procedure over the electric isolation of the left atrium. Although a similar incidence of atrial rhythm (81%) was reported by Graffigna and colleagues17 in patients with AF and organic diseases undergoing combined left atrial isolation, detrimental hemodynamics and risk of thromboembolism inherent to AF may remain unchanged. Chua and colleagues18 contended that surgical ablation for established AF should be associated with little or no additional mortality or morbidity because there were no differences in survival and neurological events between patients with or without AF after repair of mitral regurgitation. The results of our review are compatible with theirs in that neurological events could be minimized with anticoagulation and that postoperative survival depends mainly on the severity of the underlying diseases regardless of the presence or absence of AF. As the maze-associated risks have been reduced, simultaneous abrogation of rhythm and organic diseases should be considered not only on the basis of mortality or morbidity but also for improved hemodynamics and quality of life, which are the benefits of the maze procedure.
Unselected application of the combined approach for the last 87 patients allowed meaningful retrospective analyses, which identified a longer history and larger preoperative and postoperative atrial dimension as predisposing factors of persisting AF, similar to those without the maze procedure.3 4 12 13 Although exclusion of patients who are less likely to regain atrial rhythm may seem prudent, simultaneous reduction in atrial size may also prove effective. Chua and colleagues18 recommended early performance of isolated mitral valve repair for recent-onset AF since spontaneous ablation of AF occurred in all 11 of their patients with AF lasting for less than 3 months. On the other hand, Bonchek and colleagues19 suggested combining the procedure prophylactically in elderly patients with atrial septal defect who are still in sinus rhythm because they are likely to develop AF. Considering the progressive nature of the underlying diseases, adding the maze procedure may be justified in patients with organic disease and AF regardless of its duration because such patients have underlying pathology, or substrate, that predisposes them to the development and maintenance of AF. We believe that patients with combined diseases who are likely to regain atrial rhythm should be considered for the combined approach provided the patients are judged capable of tolerating and benefiting from the procedure.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Cox JL, Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, Ferguson TB, Cain
ME, Lindsay BD, Corr P, Kater KM, Lappas DG. Successful surgical
treatment of atrial fibrillation: review and clinical
up-date. JAMA. 1991;266:1976-1980.
3. Sato S, Kawashima Y, Hirose H, Nakano S, Matsuda H, Shirakura R. Long-term results of direct-current cardioversion after open commissurrotomy for mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol.. 1986;57:629-633. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Chesebro JH, Fuster V, Halperin JL. Atrial fibrillation: risk marker for stroke. N Engl J Med. 1990;232:1556-1558.
5. Kosakai Y, Kawaguchi AT, Isobe F, Sasako Y, Nakano K, Eishi K, Kito Y, Kawashima Y. Maze procedure modified to preserve sinus node arteries. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993;16:880. Abstract.
6.
Kosakai Y, Kawaguchi AT, Isobe F, Sasako Y, Nakano K,
Eishi K, Tanaka N, Kito Y, Kawashima Y. Cox maze procedure for
chronic atrial fibrillation associated with mitral valve
disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;108:1049-1055.
7. Kawazoe K, Beppu S, Takahara Y, Nakajima N, Tanaka K, Ichihashi K, Fujita T, Manabe H. Surgical treatment of giant left atrium combined with mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;85:885-892. [Abstract]
8. McAlpine WA. Heart and Coronary Arteries. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1975:151-159.
9. Cox JL. Evolving applications of the maze procedure for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;55:578-580. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Barner HB. Combined superior and right lateral left atriotomy with division of the superior vena cava for exposure of the mitral valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985;40:365-367. [Abstract]
11. Miyatake K, Okamoto M, Kinoshita N, Owa M, Nakasone I, Sakakibara H, Nimura Y. Augmentation of atrial contribution to left ventricular inflow with aging as assessed by intracardiac Doppler flowmetry. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:586-589. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Waris E, Kreus KE, Salokannel J. Factors influencing persistence of sinus rhythm after DC shock treatment of atrial fibrillation. Acta Med Scand. 1971;189:161-166. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Henry WL, Morganroth J, Pearlman AS, Clark CE, Redwood
DR, Itscoitz SB, Epstein SE. Relation between
echocardiographically determined left atrial size and
atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1976;53:273-279.
14. Kawaguchi AT, Kosakai Y, Isobe F, Sasako Y, Eishi K, Nakano K, Kito Y, Kawashima Y. Risk and benefit of combined maze procedure for atrial fibrillation associated with valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:459A. Abstract.
15. Holman WL, Ikeshita M, Ungerleider RM, Smith PK, Ideker RE, Cox JL. Cryosurgery for cardiac arrhythmias: acute and chronic effects on coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol.. 1983;51:149-155. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Tamai J, Kosakai Y, Yoshioka T, Ohnishi E, Shimomura K, Kawashima Y. Blunted sinoatrial node response to exercise after cardiac surgery with the maze procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol.. 1994;23:251A. Abstract.
17. Graffigna A, Pagani F, Minzioni G, Salerno J, Vigano M. Left atrial isolation associated with mitral valve operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 192;54:1093-1098.
18.
Chua YL, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Morris JJ.
Outcome of mitral valve repair in patients with preoperative atrial
fibrillation: should the maze procedure be combined with mitral
valvuloplasty? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:408-415.
19. Bonchek LI, Burlingame MW, Worley SJ, Vazales BE, Lundy EF. Cox/maze procedure for atrial septal defect with atrial fibrillation: management strategies. Ann Thorac Surg.. 1993;55:607-610.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. O. von Oppell, N. Masani, P. O'Callaghan, R. Wheeler, G. Dimitrakakis, and S. Schiffelers Mitral valve surgery plus concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation is superior to mitral valve surgery alone with an intensive rhythm control strategy Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2009; 35(4): 641 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. El Oumeiri, C. Stefanidis, A. Sabry, M. Antoine, J.-M. De Smet, D. De Canniere, and J.-L. Jansens Long-term follow-up after endocardial radiofrequency modified Nitta procedure for concomitant atrial fibrillation treatment Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2007; 6(3): 319 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Fayad, T. Le Tourneau, T. Modine, R. Azzaoui, P.-V. Ennezat, C. Decoene, G. Deklunder, and H. Warembourg Endocardial Radiofrequency Ablation During Mitral Valve Surgery: Effect on Cardiac Rhythm, Atrial Size, and Function Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1505 - 1511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chiappini, R. Di Bartolomeo, and G. Marinelli Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Different Approaches Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2004; 12(3): 272 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Romano, D. S. Bach, F. D. Pagani, R. L. Prager, G. M. Deeb, and S. F. Bolling Atrial reduction plasty Cox maze procedure: extended indications for atrial fibrillation surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1282 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chiappini, S. Martin-Suarez, A. LoForte, G. Arpesella, R. Di Bartolomeo, and G. Marinelli Cox/Maze III operation versus radiofrequency ablation for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: a comparative study Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 87 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Chiappini, S. Martin-Suarez, A. LoForte, R. Di Bartolomeo, and G. Marinelli Surgery for atrial fibrillation using radiofrequency catheter ablation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 1788 - 1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. T Sie, W. P Beukema, A. Elvan, and A. R Ramdat Misier New strategies in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2003; 58(3): 501 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Vignati, G. Crupi, V. Vanini, F. S. Iorio, A. Borghi, and S. Giusti Surgical treatment of arrhythmias related to congenital heart diseases Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2003; 75(4): 1194 - 1199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Matsumoto, G. Watanabe, M. Endo, H. Sasaki, and F. Kasashima Coexistence of sinus rhythm and segmental atrial fibrillation after maze procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2002; 74(1): 249 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Shimizu and O. A. Centurion Electrophysiological properties of the human atrium in atrial fibrillation Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2002; 54(2): 302 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Guang, C. Zhen-jie, L. Wei Yong, L. Tong, and L. Ying Evaluation of clinical treatment of atrial fibrillation associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease by radiofrequency ablation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 249 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. T. Sie, W. P. Beukema, A. R. R. Misier, A. Elvan, J. J. Ennema, M. M.P. Haalebos, and H. J.J. Wellens Radiofrequency modified maze in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2001; 122(2): 249 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. T. Sie, W. P. Beukema, A. R. Ramdat Misier, A. Elvan, J. J. Ennema, and H. J.J. Wellens The radiofrequency modified maze procedure. A less invasive surgical approach to atrial fibrillation during open-heart surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2001; 19(4): 443 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kawahira, H. Uemura, T. Yagihara, Y. Yoshikawa, and S. Kitamura Renewal of the Fontan circulation with concomitant surgical intervention for atrial arrhythmia Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 71(3): 919 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Millar, J. M. Arcidi Jr, and P. J.M. Alison The maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: should the indications be expanded? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2000; 70(5): 1580 - 1586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Melo, P. Adragao, J. Neves, M. Ferreira, A. Timoteo, T. Santiago, R. Ribeiras, and M. Canada Endocardial and epicardial radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation with a new intra-operative device Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 18(2): 182 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Benussi, C. Pappone, S. Nascimbene, G. Oreto, A. Caldarola, P. L. Stefano, V. Casati, and O. Alfieri A simple way to treat chronic atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: the epicardial radiofrequency approach Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2000; 17(5): 524 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pasic, M. Musci, B. Edelmann, H. Siniawski, P. Bergs, and R. Hetzer Identification of P waves after the Cox-maze procedure: significance of right precordial leads V3R through V6R Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1999; 67(5): 1292 - 1294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Chen, G. B.-F. Guo, J.-P. Chang, K.-H. Yeh, and M. Fu Radiofrequency and Cryoablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Valvular Operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 1998; 65(6): 1666 - 1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kobayashi, Y. Kosakai, K. Nakano, Y. Sasako, K. Eishi, and F. Yamamoto Improved success rate of the maze procedure in mitral valve disease by new criteria for patients' selection Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 1998; 13(3): 247 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |