(Circulation. 1995;92:1969-1980.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute (M.J.B., K.W.S., L.Y.) and the Department of Physiology (K.W.S.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, and the Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.E.P.), Tulane University, New Orleans, La.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We introduced PVCs, over a range of coupling
intervals and during a range of basic drive cycle lengths (BCLs), and
determined PED repolarization. Our results from whole-animal
experiments, isolated cell studies, and computer simulations are
reported. In the whole-animal experiments, PED refractory periods
(RPs) were longer than RPBCL. The greatest difference
between RPPED and RPBCL
(
RPmax) occurred after short coupling interval
PVCs and was 4.3±0.8, 4.2±0.8, and 2.1±0.5 ms (mean±SEM) during
drives with short, intermediate, and long BCLs, respectively. The
diastolic interval preceding the PED (DIPED)
was inversely related to the coupling interval between the basic drive
beat and the PVC and directly related to RPPED. PED action
potential durations (APDs) of isolated canine myocytes were 9.8±4.9 ms
(mean±SEM) longer than APD BCL (n=19). The DiFrancesco-Noble membrane
equations were used in simulations of action potential propagation in a
one-dimensional cable, with stimulation protocols duplicating those
in the animal experiments. PVCs prolonged APDPED,
and APDPED was prolonged more during short than during long
BCL drives. There was a direct relation between DIPED and
APDPED. Analysis of the membrane currents over the
time course of the PVCs and PEDs suggested that the ionic basis for PED
repolarization prolongation was the interaction of Ito and
IK. Hyperpolarizing constant-current injections
introduced immediately after the spike of isolated myocyte action
potentials caused APD prolongation. This observation is
consistent with the Ito and IK
interaction causing PED repolarization prolongation.
Conclusions PED repolarization prolongation could provide sites for unidirectional block to propagation of PVCs after PEDs and could facilitate initiation of reentrant tachyarrhythmias after short-long-short sequences of cycle lengths.
Key Words: action potentials arrhythmia calcium channels electrophysiology reentry
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effects of cycle length on RP have been studied extensively.7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 However, these effects are complex and still have not been completely defined. Changes in cardiac cycle lengths have immediate effects on repolarization properties of the subsequent beat, ie, APD and RP, but a new steady state is not reached immediately.13 14 15 16 17 18 19 The most dramatic cycle lengthinduced changes in repolarization properties occur during the first cycle. RPs then oscillate over several cycles, and a new steady state is reached only after several hundred cycles. This slow change in RP from the steady-state duration associated with one BCL to the steady-state duration associated with another BCL has been referred to as "cardiac memory."17
Single PVCs have even more complicated effects on repolarization properties.11 18 20 21 These effects result in part from changes in cycle length, which are nonuniform if the site of origin of the PVC differs from the site of origin of the BCL beat. PVCs usually have shorter repolarization durations than repolarization duration during the BCL drive. This decrease in repolarization duration results because of the short PVC cycle length. However, the effect of PVCs on repolarization duration cannot be explained solely on the basis of either the PVC cycle length or memory for the repolarization properties of the BCL beats. Gettes et al20 reported that the APD of PVCs in porcine Purkinje fibers was shorter than the APD during regular drive at the PVC cycle length. They attributed this phenomenon to the proximity of the PVC upstroke to the downstroke of the preceding beat, ie, the DI preceding the PVC. The relation of repolarization durations over a range of PVC cycle lengths to the preceding DI has also been referred to as electrical restitution.18 12 21 Electrical restitution characterizes repolarization durations of PVCs as a function of the premature cycle lengths, from the earliest possible PVC to the BCL.
The effects of single PVCs on the repolarization properties of the beats immediately after them, ie, the PED, have not been studied in detail. On the one hand, it might be expected that "memory" for the short cycle length of the PVC would shorten repolarization properties of the PED compared with the BCL repolarization properties. On the other hand, the DI preceding a PED is longer than the DI of the BCL beat because of the short repolarization properties of the PVC. Prolongation of the DI would be expected to increase the repolarization duration of the PED compared with the repolarization duration during the BCL. Alternatively, the two mechanisms might act to cancel one another so that repolarization properties of the PED would equal those of the BCL beat.
This report concerns our results from whole-animal experiments, isolated myocyte experiments, and computer simulations in which the effects of PVCs on PED repolarization properties were characterized. The results demonstrate that PVCs cause prolongation of PED repolarization, and the computer simulations and isolated myocyte studies provide insights concerning the likely ionic basis for this prolongation. Prolongation of PED repolarization could contribute to arrhythmogenesis by providing a site for the unidirectional block that is essential for sustained reentrant arrhythmias.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The trachea was intubated, and a fixed-volume pump respirator was used to ventilate the animal with room air. The chest was opened by midline sternotomy, and the heart was suspended in a pericardial cradle. The sinus node was crushed to slow the intrinsic heart rate and permit pacing over a range of BCLs. A bipolar hook stimulating electrode was placed in the right atrial appendage. An array of 1-mm-diameter silver electrodes embedded in an epoxy plaque was sutured to the anterior surface of the right ventricle. All of these electrodes were confined to a 1.4-cm2 region. These unipolar electrodes were used to pace the ventricle simultaneously with the atrium, to measure RPs, and to record electrograms. The atrium and ventricle were paced simultaneously to decrease the likelihood of retrograde atrial activation and echo beats during RP measurements. A needle electrode placed in the chest wall served as the indifferent electrode for ventricular pacing and RP test stimuli. A Wilson central terminal was used as the indifferent recording electrode, and a vertical-lead ECG was displayed on an oscilloscope to monitor the heart's response to the BCL stimuli (S1), to the premature stimuli (S2), and to the test stimuli used to measure RP.
Pacing Protocol and Intervals Measured
The pattern of stimulation and the intervals measured for
analysis of the results are diagrammed in Fig 1
.
Four successive action potentials, marked 1 through 4, are shown at the
top of the figure. The stimulus intervals, activation time intervals,
RPs, and the DIs preceding each beat are diagrammed at the bottom of
the figure. Action potentials 1 and 2 are the last beats in response to
a train of regular S1s delivered at a selected BCL. Action potential 3
is a PVC in response to S2. The S1-S2 interval is the coupling interval
of the PVC. Action potential 4 is the PED, and it is the first beat in
response to a new train of S1. The S2-S1 interval in the animal
experiments, isolated myocyte experiments, and computer simulations
always equaled the S1-S1 interval, ie, the BCL.
ABCL, APVC, and APED
are the local activation times of the regularly driven beats, the PVC,
and the PED, respectively. RPBCL,
RPPVC, and RPPED are the refractory
periods of those beats. Similarly, APDBCL,
APDPVC, and APDPED
represent the respective action potential durations.
DIBCL, DIPVC, and
DIPED represent the intervals between the
activation times of the BCL, PVC, or PED and the RPs (animal
experiments) or APDs (isolated myocyte experiments and computer
simulations) of the beats preceding them.
|
Refractory Period Measurement Protocol
Each heart was paced at a fixed S1-S1 interval for at least 5
minutes before RP measurements were initiated. This provided time for
RPs to reach their steady-state durations. S1 was delivered
simultaneously to the right atrium and one of the
electrodes on the surface of the right ventricle. RPBCL was
measured by delivery of 2-ms,
twice-diastolic-threshold, constant-current,
cathodal stimuli to another electrode on the array. The RP test stimuli
were delivered after every sixth S1. They were first delivered early in
the cycle, at a time when they did not elicit a response. Then the RP
test stimuli were delayed in 1-ms increments until a propagated
response occurred. This caused the rhythm to remain regular until the
RP test stimulus was delayed sufficiently to induce a propagated
response. RPBCL was taken as the shortest S1-RP test
stimulus interval that induced a propagated response minus the
activation time at the RP test site. The activation time was taken as
the time of the minimum derivative of the QRS in the electrogram
recorded from the test site and was referenced to S1. After
RPBCL had been measured, PVCs were induced by S2 stimuli
delivered to the basic drive site after every sixth S1. The time of S2
was first set 2 to 3 ms longer than RPBCL at the drive
site. In all experiments, the interval between S2 and the next S1, ie,
the PED, always equaled the S1-S1 interval (see Fig 1
).
RPPVC and RPPED were measured by delivery of RP
test stimuli to the test site during repolarization of the PVC or the
PED as described for the RPBCL. The S1-S2 interval was then
incremented by 5 to 10 ms for short S1-S2 intervals and by 20 to 40 ms
as the S1-S2 interval approached the BCL. RPPVC and
RPPED were measured during drives with each S1-S2 coupling
interval. This procedure was repeated during drives at 2 to 4 BCL and
drives of 1 to 2 sites in each experiment: 1 drive site and 1 test site
(n=12), 1 drive site and 2 test sites (n=4), 2 drive sites and 1 test
site (n=3), 2 drive sites and 2 test sites (n=1), and 2 drive sites and
3 test sites (n=1). Measurements were made over a sufficient range of
S1-S2 coupling intervals in 18 experiments to construct restitution
curves (see "Data Analysis"). In 3 other experiments, RP
was measured during regular drive, after PVCs with short coupling
intervals, and after the PEDs that followed the
short-coupling-interval PVCs. There were insufficient data to
construct restitution curves for these 3 experiments, but the data were
used in other analyses (see "Data Analysis").
Isolated Myocyte Studies
Ventricular myocytes were obtained from the
epicardial region of the pulmonary conus of three dogs. The
animals were anesthetized with pentobarbital (30 mg/kg), and
the hearts were rapidly removed via a lateral thoracotomy. The aorta
was quickly cannulated, and the coronary circulation was
flushed with 140 mL of a cold (
4°C), nominally
Ca2+-free solution to stop contractile activity and
reduce metabolic rate. The solution contained (in mmol/L)
NaCl 126.0, KCl 4.4, dextrose 22.0, MgCl2 5.0, taurine
20.0, creatine 5.0, sodium pyruvate 5.0,
NaH2PO4 1.0, HEPES 24, and NaOH 12.5 (pH 7.4).
The left coronary artery was rapidly cannulated via the left
coronary ostia, and the heart was placed, anterior surface
facing up, in a temperature-controlled chamber (34°C). Flow rate
through the cannula was held at 40 mL/min. Perfusion with the above
solution was maintained for 10 minutes and was followed by
recirculation of the same solution (200 mL) containing 1 mg/mL
collagenase (class II, Worthington Biochemical), 0.1 mg/mL
protease (type XIV, Sigma), and 0.1 mmol/L CaCl2 for 30
minutes. After the enzyme digestion, the heart was perfused with the
same solution, without enzymes, for 10 minutes. Color changes in the
heart delineated the epicardial region exposed to the enzymes. This
included the area of the pulmonary conus studied in the
whole-animal experiments, although other hearts were used for the
whole-animal studies. Myocytes were obtained by removing thin
portions from the epicardial surface of the conus. The tissue was
minced with iris scissors in 0.1 mmol/L Ca2+ and
then gently shaken for
5 minutes. This procedure yielded
60% to
80% rod-shaped, quiescent cells. Cells were dispersed into a
glass-bottomed chamber mounted on an inverted phase-contrast
microscope (Diaphot, Nikon) and continuously superfused at 36°C with
a solution containing (in mmol/L) NaCl 126.0, dextrose 11.0, KCl 4.4,
MgCl2 1.0, CaCl2 1.0, and HEPES 24.0 titrated
with 13.0 mmol/L NaOH (pH 7.4).
Suction pipettes were made with borosilicate capillary tubing (Corning
number 7052, 1.65-mm OD, 1.2-mm ID) and had resistances of 2 to 4 M
when filled. They were filled with a solution containing (in mmol/L)
KCl 113, NaCl 10, MgCl2 0.5, K2ATP 5, HEPES 10,
dextrose 5, and KOH 11 (pH 7.1). Membrane potential was measured with
an Axoclamp 2A amplifier in the bridge mode and digitized at 4 kHz.
Depolarizing constant-current pulses (2 to 3 ms in duration, twice
diastolic threshold) were delivered via the suction pipette
to elicit action potentials at a basic cycle length of either 400 or
500 ms. APD was measured at 90% repolarization (APD90).
All myocytes used in this study had a prominent spike-and-dome
configuration, indicative of a large Ito22 23
and consistent with previous reports of canine epicardial
ventricular myocytes.24 25
Our objective in the myocyte experiments was to determine the maximum effect of the PVC on the duration of the PED by maximizing the diastolic interval between the PVC and PED. This was achieved by initiating PVCs early during repolarization at takeoff potentials that ranged between -54 and -65 mV. To assess the effect of phase 1 amplitude on APD, a brief hyperpolarizing current pulse was delivered to paced cells immediately after the peak of the action potential. This current pulse was delivered via the suction pipette.
Data Analysis
RPmax was identified for each set of RP
measurements. A set of RP measurements was defined as the measurements
acquired during drive of one site at a selected BCL and included
RPBCL, RPPVC over the range of S1-S2
intervals used, and RPPED after PVCs over the same range of
S1-S2 coupling intervals. As mentioned above, in three whole-animal
experiments, RP measurements were taken only during BCL drive and after
short coupling PVCs and the PEDs that followed them. The data from
these experiments were used for assessing
RPmax,
but there were insufficient data to construct complete restitution
curves for these experiments. Restitution curves of the relation of DI
to RP were constructed from data from the other 18 whole-animal
experiments. The mean±SEM of
RPmax was
calculated from all sets of measurements without regard to BCL. Then
sets of measurements were grouped into short, intermediate, and long
BCLs, and the mean±SEM of
RPmax was calculated for each
BCL group. The differences between APD90 of regularly
driven beats and APD90 of PEDs (
APD) were determined
from action potentials recorded from the isolated myocytes, and the
mean±SEM of these values was calculated. The paired t test
was used to assess the significance of
RPmax and
APD
in the whole-animal and isolated myocyte studies, respectively.
Student's t test was used to assess differences in
RPmax between BCL groups in the whole-animal
experiments. Values of P<.05 were considered
significant.
Computer Simulations
A set of computer simulations was performed to further
characterize the effects of PVCs on PED repolarization properties and
to gain insight into the possible ionic mechanism for the experimental
results. The relation between DIPED and APDPED
as a function of BCL was evaluated with a one-dimensional
propagation model. The one-dimensional model allowed assessment of
repolarization properties in response to a range of BCLs and S1-S2
intervals. It also allowed application of stimuli and measurement of
APD at different sites. Simulations using a one-dimensional
propagation model eliminated the possibility that electrotonic effects
of anisotropic action potential propagation affected
APD.26
The electrical activity in the myocardium was described by the equation
![]() | (1) |
where Im is the transmembrane current density, Cm the specific membrane capacitance, Vm the transmembrane potential, and Iion the ionic current source density.27 In this one-dimensional fiber model, spatial current flow was characterized by a monodomain representation of tissue structure28 :
![]() | (2) |
where a is the radius of a single myocardial fiber (0.001 cm)
and Ri the specific intracellular resistance of
the myoplasm (250
-cm). Equations 1 and 2 were combined and then
discretized in space and time according to the method of Crank and
Nicholson as described in Reference 29. Equation 2
was discretized in
space into a set of 101 elements of length dx=0.005 cm to monitor
action potential propagation over a 5-mm distance. Equation 1
was
discretized in time by a previously described
variable-time-step method that ensured fine temporal
integration to monitor propagation of the depolarization wave front
(dtmin=0.002 ms) while allowing larger time steps to
be taken during periods in which variables in the model were
changing slowly (dtmax=1.024 ms).30
In Equation 1
, Iion was determined from the DiFrancesco and
Noble31 membrane equations for sheep Purkinje fibers. All
software was written in FORTRAN-77, and calculations were
performed on an IBM RS/6000 model 560 workstation at Tulane Computing
Services. To ensure that the membrane equations had been coded
correctly, we compared our solutions using software written via
translation of the program HEART32 with
solutions using software assembled according to the guidelines
described by Cabo and Barr.33 Although the
animal-experiment data were from the canine epicardium, we used the
DiFrancesco-Noble Purkinje fiber equations because they include
contemporary mathematical representations of active ionic
transfer processes. Importantly, the DiFrancesco-Noble equations
account for changes in intracellular and extracellular ion
concentrations, intracellular calcium uptake and release, a
sodium-calcium exchange current, and an Ito.
To mimic features of the whole-animal and isolated myocyte pacing protocols, the one-dimensional model was paced over a range of BCLs (400, 500, 600, and 1000 ms). All simulations were initiated with an intracellular current square-wave pulse of 1.0-mA/cm2 intensity and 2-ms duration applied at three nodes at one end of the cable. The model was paced for four to five beats, and then an S2 was introduced at the same nodes at the cable end to initiate a PVC. S2 and S1 had identical magnitudes, and S2 was introduced over a range of S1-S2 intervals (250 to 400 ms, 25-ms steps). Action potentials in response to the stimulus protocol were "recorded" 3.75 mm from the stimulated end of the model. The activation time of the action potential was taken as the time of the maximum temporal derivative during the upstroke. APD was measured from the time of the maximum temporal derivative during the upstroke of the action potential to the time the downstroke returned to -60 mV. DI was taken as the interval between the time of dv/dtmax of the upstroke of one beat and the time the downstroke of the preceding beat reached -60 mV.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PVCs with short coupling intervals had greater effects on RPPED than PVCs with long coupling intervals. As the coupling interval of the PVC was increased, the magnitude of its effect on RPPED diminished, and the duration of RPPED approached the duration of RPBCL. During short BCL drives, short-coupling-interval PVCs prolonged RPPED in all but one experiment. In that experiment, PVCs also shortened RPPED during intermediate BCL drives. In two other experiments, short-coupling-interval PVCs prolonged RPPED during short BCL drives but shortened RPPED during long BCL drives. In all of the other 18 experiments, short-coupling-interval PVCs prolonged RPPED during all BCL drives.
The results from all 21 experiments are summarized in Fig 2A
.
RPmax was identified for each set of
measurements, and the means±SEM of these values were calculated. As
mentioned above,
RPmax occurred after PVCs with short
coupling intervals.
RPmax averaged 4.3±0.8 ms for the
short-BCL group, 4.2±0.8 ms for the intermediate-BCL group, and
2.1±0.5 ms for the long-BCL group. When all BCLs were considered
together,
RPmax averaged 3.5±0.4 ms. The mean
RPmax was significant for all groups of cycle lengths.
In addition, the mean
RPmax for the short- and
intermediate-BCL groups were significantly greater than the mean
RPmax for the long-BCL group. The medians for
RPmax were 5.5, 3.5, and 2.0 ms for the short-,
intermediate-, and long-BCL groups, respectively.
|
APDmax over a range of S1-S2 coupling intervals was also
determined for three BCLs in the computer simulations. As shown in Fig 2B
, APDPED was longer than APDBCL during all
BCLs. In addition, APDPED prolongation was greatest after
short-coupling-interval PVCs and was greatest during the
shortest BCL drive.
APDmax was 16 ms during the 400-ms
BCL drive, 13 ms during the 500-ms drive, and 9 ms during the 600-ms
drive. Although quantitatively larger, the direction of changes in APD
in the model corresponded to the results of the animal experiments.
The effects of PVCs on PED repolarization were also evaluated with
studies of isolated epicardial myocytes. Action potentials recorded
from one myocyte are shown in Fig 3
. The BCL was 400 ms.
A PVC delivered early during repolarization prolonged the
APDPED by 16 ms from 234 to 250 ms and increased the
magnitude of phase 1 repolarization. The mean±SEM of
APD for the 11
cells stimulated at a 400-ms BCL was 10.7±1.6 ms, P<.001
(239±2.4 ms compared with 250±3.0 ms). For the 8 cells stimulated at
a 500-ms BCL,
APD was 8.5±1.4 ms, P<.005 (245±6.1 ms
compared with 253±5.7 ms). The medians for
APD were 8.5 ms and 9
ms, respectively, during the 500-ms and 400-ms BCL drives. The
APDs
during the 400-ms and 500-ms BCL drives were not statistically
significantly different from each other. However, there was
considerable variability in APD between cells, and only 1 cell was
paced at both BCLs.
|
Relation of S1-S2 to PED Repolarization
Fig 4A
shows the relation between the S1-S2
coupling interval and RPPED during drives at 480-, 400-,
and 320-ms BCLs in one experiment. During drives at all BCLs, short
S1-S2 coupling intervals increased RPPED. There was an
inverse relation between RPPED and the S1-S2 coupling
interval. That is, short-coupling-interval PVCs prolonged
RPPED more than PVCs with long coupling intervals. In
addition, as noted above, the effects of PVCs on RPPED were
greatest during the shortest-BCL drive.
|
The relation between S1-S2 and APDPED during simulations
with drives at three BCLs is shown in Fig 4B
. As in the animal
experiments, APDPED was inversely related to the S1-S2
coupling interval. Thus, APDPED was long when the S1-S2
coupling interval was short and decreased as the S1-S2 coupling
interval approached the BCL. In accord with the animal experiments (Fig 4A
), the effect of PVCs on APDPED was greatest during drive
at the shortest BCL.
Electrical Restitution and the Relation of S1-S2 to
DIPED
Prolongation of PED repolarization cannot be explained on the
basis of "memory" for the short PVC cycle. We therefore examined
whether PED repolarization prolongation was due to proximity effects.
Data for this analysis are shown in Figs 5
and 6
. These data
are from the same experiment as illustrated in Fig 4A
and the same
simulations as illustrated in Fig 4B
.
|
|
Fig 5A
shows restitution curves of the relation between
the DIPVC and RPPVC during short, intermediate,
and long BCLs. RPPVC was always shorter than
RPBCL in this and all experiments. RPPVC became
progressively longer as DIPVC increased. DIPVC
increased because we systematically increased the S1-S2 interval. In
this and in other experiments, RPPVC of the earliest
possible PVC was often 1 to 2 ms longer than the RPPVC of a
PVC occurring a few milliseconds later. This characteristic of early
restitution has been previously noted.21 In addition,
large changes in RPPVC occurred with small changes in
DIPVC when DIPVC was short. When
DIPVC was more than
50 ms, however, further increases in
DIPVC had less effect on RPPVC. The forms of
the restitution curves shown in Fig 5A
are consistent with
previous reports.8 12 21 Restitution curves of the
relation of DIPVC to APDPVC constructed from
data acquired from the 400-, 500-, and 600-ms BCL simulations are shown
in Fig 5B
. As in the animal experiments, APDPVC increased
with DIPVC, and the expected cycle-length
dependence in the restitution curves was observed. Although the
characteristic flattening of the restitution curves at long
DIPVC was absent from the simulations at 400-, 500-, and
600-ms BCLs (Fig 5B
), flattening of the curve was apparent in data from
a 1000-ms BCL simulation (Fig 5C
). This occurred because APD from the
DiFrancesco-Noble membrane equations is longer than epicardial myocyte
APD. As a result, a DIPVC sufficiently long to recreate the
flat portion of the restitution curve occurred only with simulations at
BCL longer than 600 ms.
The relations of DIPED to S1-S2 for the animal experiment
and the computer simulations are shown in Fig 6A
and 6B
.
DIPED increased as the S1-S2 interval decreased during
drives at all three BCLs. This occurred because RPPVC and
APDPVC decreased as the S1-S2 interval decreased (see Fig 5
). These analyses suggested that prolongation of PED
repolarization was most likely due to effects of DIPED.
Relation of DI and BCL to PED Repolarization
Fig 7A
shows that the refractory period of the PED
increased as DIPED increased. In addition, the slope of the
RPPED versus DIPED relation was less at long
than at short BCLs.
RPmax was 2 ms for the 480-ms BCL
drive, 3 ms for the 400-ms BCL drive, and 5 ms for the 320-ms BCL
drive. The slopes (m) of the relation were m=0.029, m=0.058, and
m=0.131 for the 480-, 400-, and 320-ms BCLs, respectively. The relation
of DIPED to RPPED was analyzed in terms
of its slope because these data were confined to the linear portion of
the restitution curve (see Fig 5A
).
|
Analysis of data from the simulations during drives at the
three BCLs also demonstrated a direct relation between
DIPED and APDPED (Fig 7B
). As in the animal
experiments, the slope of the relation of DIPED to
APDPED increased as the BCL decreased. The slopes of the
relation were m=0.079, m=0.138, and m=0.205 for the 600-, 500-, and
400-ms BCL drives, respectively. Thus, in both the animal experiments
and simulations, the slope of the relation of RPPED and
APDPED versus DIPED decreased as the BCL
increased.
Fig 8
summarizes data from all experiments and further
documents the influence of BCL on RPPED prolongation. The
slope of the relation of DIPED to RPPED is
plotted as a function of the change in BCL. The shortest BCL in each
experiment is plotted at zero. There was a positive slope for the
relation of DIPED to RPPED for all but three
observations made during drive at the shortest BCL and for most
observations made during drives at longer BCLs. Since DIPED
was inversely related to the S1-S2 coupling interval (see Fig 6
), the
data indicate that RPPED was longest when the S1-S2
interval was the shortest and RPPED decreased as the S1-S2
interval increased. In addition, the slope of the relation of
DIPED to RPPED usually decreased as the BCL
increased (Fig 8A
). This indicates that PVCs had greater effects on
RPPED during drives at short BCLs than at long BCLs.
|
Fig 8B
shows data from experiments in which the slopes of the relation
of DIPED to RPPED were negative or close to
zero during drive at the shortest BCL. The two curves shown as solid
lines are from one experiment and represent data acquired
during drives at two BCLs and drives of two sites. In this experiment,
there was a negative slope to the relation of DIPED to
RPPED during drives at both BCLs. This indicates that in
this experiment, RPPED increased as DIPED
decreased. The magnitude of RPPED shortening that occurred
in this experiment was less during long- than short-BCL drives. The
dashed curve in Fig 8B
is from another experiment. The slope of the
relation of DIPED to RPPED was close to 0
during the short-BCL drive, and there was a direct relation between
DIPED and RPPED during drive at the longer BCL.
The reasons for these exceptions to the usual relation of
DIPED to RPPED that we observed are uncertain.
However, the positive slopes of the relation of DIPED to
RPPED that were present in the great majority of the
experiments indicated that DIPED was an important
determinant of RPPED. The decrease in the slope of the
relation during long-BCL drives indicated that PVCs had greater effects
on RPPED during drives at short BCLs than during drive at
long BCLs.
Ionic Mechanisms for PED Repolarization Prolongation
It was not possible to determine the ionic mechanism for
RPPED prolongation in the intact-heart experiments.
However, observations from the computer simulations and isolated
myocyte studies provided insights into the mechanism.
The time courses for selected variables from the DiFrancesco-Noble
equations in simulations during PVCs and the PEDs that followed them
were analyzed. Because the magnitude of PED prolongation was
greatest during drives at short BCLs, all records presented
here are from the shortest-BCL (400-ms) simulations. Fig 9A
shows the transmembrane potentials for PVCs at a
number of S1-S2 coupling intervals, and Fig 9B
shows the transmembrane
potentials for the PEDs after those PVCs. As expected, the PVC action
potential was shortest at an S1-S2 coupling interval of 250 ms and
longest at an S1-S2 coupling interval that equaled the BCL, ie, 400 ms.
Consistent with the data in Fig 7
, the PED action potential was
longest after the PVC with the 250-ms S1-S2 coupling interval, and it
was shortest when the S1-S2 coupling interval equaled the BCL. At
intermediate S1-S2 intervals of 300 and 350 ms, the PED action
potentials had durations intermediate between the APDs of PEDs that
followed PVCs, with coupling intervals of 250 and 400 ms.
|
In simulations for each S1-S2 coupling interval, all membrane equation
variables at the observation point in the one-dimensional model
were stored. Those variables were then monitored over the time
course of the PVC and PED. The main determinants of APD in the
DiFrancesco-Noble membrane equations are the IK, the
IK1, the Ito, and the
ICa. Fig 10A
illustrates the time course of
IK, Ito, and ICa
during the PVCs shown in Fig 9A
. As the coupling interval decreased,
the magnitude of IK increased early in the plateau of the
PVC, causing a more rapid rate of repolarization and decreased APD.
This increased DIPED. Part of the increased IK
resulted from incomplete deactivation as DIPVC was
reduced.34 Also contributing to the increase in
IK during the PVC was the decrease in
Ito, which made Vm more positive
immediately after the peak of the action potential. Increased
Vm caused greater activation of IK. Shown in
Fig 10B
is the time course of these currents and the inward rectifier
IK1 during PEDs that followed PVCs with S1-S2 coupling
intervals of 400 and 250 ms. As in the case of the PVC, IK
was smallest when DIPED was longest, ie, after the PVC with
a 250-ms S1-S2 coupling interval. This reduction in IK
early in the plateau of the PED slowed the rate of repolarization,
resulting in delayed rise in IK1 and thus increased
APDPED. In both the PVC and PED, ICa remained
relatively constant throughout most of the action potential and thus
had little effect on APD.
|
Action potentials recorded from an isolated myocyte are shown in
Fig 3
and demonstrate that in addition to APDPED
prolongation, phase 1 amplitude increased in the PED. This was
presumably due to greater activation of
Ito.22 25 To assess the possibility that a
less positive Vm at the start of the plateau contributes to
PED prolongation, phase 1 amplitude was artificially increased by
application of a brief hyperpolarizing current pulse immediately after
the peak of the action potential. The effects of current injection on
the action potential of one cell paced at a 400-ms BCL are shown in Fig 11
. The action potential associated with current
injection was 22 ms longer than the one without current injection.
Qualitatively, the same results were observed in each of the five other
cells examined.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effects of single premature beats on myocardial repolarization properties have also been studied extensively and are even more complex than the effects due to changes in BCL. Repolarization usually shortens during PVCs. However, some studies have reported35 36 that premature action potentials actually had longer durations than action potentials with longer cycle lengths. The reasons for these exceptions are uncertain, but they may be related to specific characteristics of the pacing protocols used or to differences in the experimental preparations. The effects of PVCs on repolarization differ from species to species and even from location to location in the same species.20 35 37 Gettes et al20 reported that APDPVC cannot be explained solely on the basis of cycle length. They found that porcine Purkinje fiber APDs were shorter during PVCs with short coupling intervals than during regular drive at the cycle length of the premature coupling interval. They referred to this phenomenon as cycle lengthindependent shortening of the APD. In myocardial cells, on the other hand, they found a cycle lengthindependent lengthening of premature APD. In both tissues, the magnitude of the cycle lengthindependent change in the premature APD was related to the proximity of the upstroke of the premature action potential to the downstroke of the preceding action potential and to the APD of the preceding action potential. That is, the magnitude of cycle lengthindependent change in the premature APD was related to the preceding DI (electrical restitution).
Although considerable attention has been paid to the effects of changes in steady-state cycle length and the effects of single PVCs on repolarization properties, little attention has been paid to the effects of PVCs on repolarization properties of PEDs. In a study directed at evaluating RPPVC over a range of coupling intervals in ischemic and nonischemic myocardium, we noted that RPPED was often a few milliseconds longer than the RP during regular drive.38 However, we did not systematically characterize the effects of PVCs on PED repolarization properties in that study.
Spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias are frequently initiated by a short-long-short sequence of cycle lengths.1 2 The first short cycle is usually due to a PVC, and the long cycle is due to the compensatory pause after the PVC. The next short cycle is due to a PVC after the PED, and this PVC initiates the tachycardia. Demonstration of the effects of PVCs on PED repolarization properties should therefore contribute to understanding the mechanism by which short-long-short sequences of cycle lengths facilitate the initiation of tachyarrhythmias.
El Sherif et al6 found that a long cycle preceding premature stimulation facilitated induction of ventricular tachycardia in a canine myocardial infarction model. The long cycle prolonged the RP of ischemic myocardium more than the RP of the nonischemic tissue. They suggested that this differential effect of the long cycle on RPs of ischemic and nonischemic myocardium produced a gradient of RPs. This gradient of RPs resulted in an arc of functional conduction block that permitted initiation of reentry when a premature stimulus was delivered during the subsequent cycle. They also suggested that the mechanism for the differential effect of the long cycle length in ischemic and nonischemic tissue was likely due to ischemic myocardium having a shorter "memory" for the preceding cycle lengths. Short-long-short patterns of stimulation have also been proposed to facilitate induction of ventricular tachycardia in patients undergoing electrophysiological testing.3 4 5 The pattern of stimulation that was suggested consisted of a train of regularly driven beats followed by a long cycle that was in turn followed by two consecutive premature stimuli.
In the study reported here, we used whole-animal and isolated myocyte experiments and computer simulations to investigate the effects of single PVCs on the repolarization properties of PEDs. The stimulus protocol was selected to be similar to the pattern of cycle lengths associated with spontaneous tachycardias. However, the timing parameters we used were comparable to the conditions associated with spontaneous premature atrial complexes. Namely, the compensatory pause was incomplete, and the activation sequences of the premature beats and the regularly driven beats were the same. Keeping the activation sequences of the regularly driven beats and the premature beats the same accomplished two things. First, the premature cycle lengths remained equal throughout the heart. If the premature stimulus had been delivered to a site other than the basic drive site, the PVC and PED cycle lengths would have differed throughout the ventricles because of differences in the activation times at individual sites during the two drives. Second, activation sequenceinduced changes in the magnitude of electrotonic effects on repolarization properties were avoided by keeping the activation sequences of the regularly driven beats and the premature beats the same.26 In addition, the interval between the premature beat and the next regularly driven beat was kept the same as the BCL. This diminished the occurrence of escape beats during slow basic drive pacing rates. The complexity of the effects of a cycle length longer than the BCL on PED repolarization was also avoided. The RP test pulse was first delivered early in the cardiac cycle, at a time when the ventricle was still refractory. The test pulse was then delayed in 1-ms increments until a propagated response occurred. The rhythm being evaluated was therefore uninterrupted by responses to the RP test pulse until it was delayed sufficiently to induce a response. Thus, the complexity of variations in cycle lengths that would have occurred if the RP test stimuli had first been delivered late in the cycle and then moved earlier was averted.
Our pacing protocol, the short-long-short protocol suggested for facilitating tachyarrhythmias during electrophysiological testing,3 4 5 and the short-long-short pacing protocol El Sherif et al6 used all differ from the pattern associated with spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias.1 2 However, all of these short-long-short patterns have one thing in common: prolongation of the DI preceding the last short cycle. In the case of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia, the first short cycle is due to a PVC. The DI preceding the next beat, ie, DIPED, is prolonged in this situation both because of the compensatory pause after the PVC and because of the short RPPVC. The sequence of cycle lengths that has been proposed for initiating clinical and experimental tachycardias consisted of a single long cycle introduced after a train of regular beats. Premature beats were then initiated in the next cycle. In this situation, DIPED was prolonged solely because of the long cycle preceding the cycle in which the PVC was introduced. With our pacing protocol, the S2-S1 interval equaled the BCL, and DIPED was prolonged solely because RPPVC and APDPVC were short. For PVCs with comparable coupling intervals, DIPED would be longer after spontaneous PVCs than after PVCs initiated with our stimulation protocol, with the protocols suggested for electrophysiological testing, or with those used to initiate tachyarrhythmias in animal experiments. The longer DIPED associated with spontaneously occurring PVCs would be expected to prolong RPPED even more than the prolongation that occurred with our pacing protocol.
Since cycle length effects on RPs dissipate slowly, our pacing protocol, in which PVCs were introduced after every sixth beat, may have had an effect on RPPED. However, frequent PVC cycle lengths would be expected to shorten RPPED. RPPED measured after rare PVCs would be expected to be longer than those measured after more frequent PVCs. Thus, although there were differences between the pattern of stimulation in our pacing protocol and the pattern of cycle lengths associated with spontaneous PVCs, these differences cannot account for the RPPED prolongation we demonstrated. In fact, RPPED prolongation would be expected to be even greater if the PVCs had been less frequent and the compensatory pauses after the PVCs had been complete.
Our whole-animal experiments, isolated myocyte studies, and computer simulations all demonstrated that PED repolarization is longer than repolarization during regular drive. Prolongation of APD of PEDs recorded from isolated feline ventricular myocytes has also been demonstrated by Rubenstein and Lipsius.39 The emphasis of their study was the ability of PVCs to reverse the phase of action potential alternans and the possible relation of that reversal to reentrant arrhythmias. In our study, the magnitude of the effects of PVCs on PED repolarization was greatest for PVCs with short coupling intervals and was greatest during short-BCL drives. The effects of PVCs on PED repolarization were qualitatively the same in both of the experimental preparations and in the computer simulations. However, the magnitude of the effects was greater in the computer simulations and isolated epicardial myocyte studies than in the whole-animal studies. The reasons for this difference are uncertain. However, previous work has shown that increased DI prolonged APD more in the epicardium than in the endocardium.24 Thus, our epicardial RPPED determinations may have been electrotonically attenuated by underlying endocardial cells. In addition, although APD and RP, in general, track each other in normal myocardium, the values are not equal. It is possible that a given change in APD was less detectable with RP measurements.
We cannot comment on whether PVCs would have the same effects on PED repolarization of regions of the myocardium other than the right ventricular epicardial tissue we studied. Additionally, we cannot comment on whether PED repolarization would prolong more in diseased than in normal myocardium. As mentioned above, the greater magnitude of effect we observed in the isolated cells and computer simulations may have been due to the lack of electrotonic interaction in the isolated cells and minimal electrotonic interactions in the cable model of action potential propagation. PVCs might therefore have greater effects on PED repolarization in diseased than in normal myocardium because of the electrical uncoupling that occurs in diseased tissue. Further studies are needed to support or refute this possibility.
The possible effect of PED repolarization prolongation on arrhythmogenesis should be considered in terms of the conditions that result in unidirectional block rather than in terms of the absolute magnitude of PED repolarization prolongation. For example, if the refractory period of a region of the myocardium were just 1 ms less than a PVC cycle length, the PVC could be conducted through that region. However, even a 1-ms prolongation of RPPED would result in block if a second PVC with the same coupling interval followed the PED. Thus, an increase in refractoriness of even a few milliseconds could produce the conditions essential for reentrant arrhythmias.
Use of the DiFrancesco-Noble membrane equations31 is a possible limitation of the computer simulations. These equations describe the ionic transfer processes for sheep Purkinje strands. RP measurements in the animal experiments were taken from the canine epicardium, and the isolated myocytes were harvested from the epicardium. One could argue that the results from the computer simulations might be qualitatively distinct from those of the experiments because differences between the ionic currents in ventricular myocardium and the specialized conduction system tissue are well known. Nevertheless, the results of the computer simulations were qualitatively the same as the animal experiment data. Although there are membrane equation sets that attempt to describe the ionic transfer processes for ventricular myocardium, none of them are better suited to represent our experimental studies than those from DiFrancesco and Noble. The Beeler and Reuter membrane equations40 were considered inappropriate because a number of the component currents that form the basis of action potential initiation and maintenance are inaccurate from a contemporary electrophysiological perspective. The Luo and Rudy41 membrane equations were not used because they have no representation of the sodium-calcium exchange current or of the Ito. Both of these currents are involved in rate-dependent tissue response. The more recent Luo and Rudy42 43 membrane equations clearly provide a contemporary description. However, many of the data for assembly of their component equations were obtained from isolated guinea pig myocytes, which do not have an Ito. Ito is prominent in canine epicardial myocytes,24 and our RP measurements and AP recordings were obtained from canine right ventricular epicardial tissue. We therefore considered representation of Ito important for our analyses. Also, the APD response to plateau voltage in the DiFrancesco-Noble membrane equations is similar to that in epicardial ventricular cells. In view of these considerations, the DiFrancesco-Noble membrane equations seemed to be the best choice for our simulations.
Analysis of the membrane variables in the computer
simulations provided indirect evidence of the possible ionic basis for
prolongation of APDPED. The prolongation of
DIPED associated with short S1-S2 coupling intervals
allowed greater time for more complete deactivation of
IK.34 Thus, IK was diminished at
the beginning of the plateau of the PED, and this caused prolongation
of the plateau and increased APD. Another factor contributing to APD
prolongation was that the increased DIPED allowed time for
more complete reactivation of Ito.22 25 The
result was a more rapid rate of phase 1 repolarization and thus a more
negative Vm at the beginning of the plateau. The increased
negativity reduced the magnitude of IK and prolonged APD.
The observation that a more negative Vm at the initiation
of the plateau results in action potential prolongation has been
described for cardiac Purkinje strands44 45 and canine
ventricular epicardium.24 Both preparations
have a prominent Ito that mediates phase 1 repolarization.
The sensitivity of APD to plateau voltage can be seen by injection of
brief constant-current pulses early in the plateau. In Purkinje
strands, early hyperpolarization of the plateau
prolongs APD.44 45 As shown in Fig 11
, we have obtained
the same response in isolated canine ventricular epicardial
myocytes. The behavior induced by artificial phase 1
hyperpolarization is consistent with the
influence of Ito on action potential repolarization. Using
canine papillary muscles, trabeculae, and epicardial
strips, Litovsky and Antzelevitch24 demonstrated that
inhibition of Ito with 4-aminopyridine shortened APD in all
preparations. However, the magnitude of shortening was most pronounced
in the epicardial preparations. Ito magnitude in epicardial
myocytes is five times higher than that in endocardial
myocytes.25
In conclusion, the results of our study demonstrate that (1) PED repolarization is prolonged with respect to repolarization during regular drive; (2) there is an inverse relation between PVC coupling intervals and PED repolarization duration; (3) there is a direct relation between DIPED and PED repolarization duration; (4) the magnitude of prolongation of PED repolarization is cycle lengthdependent, with greater prolongation of PED repolarization associated with short-BCL drives; (5) the computer simulations and isolated myocyte studies suggested that the likely ionic basis for prolongation of PED repolarization is the interaction of Ito and IK; and (6) the results of our study suggest a possible mechanism for initiation of ventricular tachycardia in the setting of a short-long-short pattern of cycle lengths. Namely, prolongation of repolarization properties of a PED could result in an arc of refractory tissue that could then cause unidirectional block of PVCs after PEDs.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 6, 1995; revision received April 24, 1995; accepted April 25, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|