Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;92:1919-1926

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LaMuraglia, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Flotte, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LaMuraglia, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Flotte, T. J.

(Circulation. 1995;92:1919-1926.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Photodynamic Therapy Inhibits Experimental Allograft Rejection

A Novel Approach for the Development of Vascular Bioprostheses

Glenn M. LaMuraglia, MD; Farzin Adili, MD; Thomas Schmitz-Rixen, MD; Norman A. Michaud, MS; Thomas J. Flotte, MD

From the Division of Vascular Surgery of the General Surgical Services (G.M.L., F.A.), Department of Pathology (T.J.F.), Department of Dermatology (N.A.M., T.J.F.), and Wellman Laboratories of Photomedicine (G.M.L., F.A., N.A.M., T.J.F.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, and the Department of Surgery, University of Cologne (T.S.-R.), Germany.

Correspondence to Glenn M. LaMuraglia, MD, Division of Vascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Biological vascular allografts have proved unsatisfactory because of thrombosis, occlusion, and aneurysmal degeneration during chronic rejection. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a technique that leads to the production of cytotoxic free radicals, was investigated as a novel method to prepare arterial allografts.

Methods and Results Shortly after impregnation with the photosensitizer drug chloroaluminum sulfonated phthalocyanine, infrarenal aortas of ACI rats were PDT-treated and orthotopically grafted in Lewis rats (PDT). The transplanted grafts were sequentially analyzed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks by morphometry, immunohistochemistry, and scanning electron microscopy. Of 25 untreated allografts, 4 (16%) developed aneurysms compared with 0 of 33 in PDT or untreated isografts (ISO, P<.001). PDT treatment of allografts significantly inhibited intimal hyperplasia (P<.001) and resulted in intimal areas comparable to those in ISO. However, medial thickness in both control allografts and PDT grafts was markedly decreased compared with ISO. External graft diameters of control allografts at 8 weeks were significantly enlarged (P<.02) compared with PDT or ISO. At all time points, T lymphocytes were found in a substantially larger number in untreated control grafts than in PDT or ISO. Scanning electron microscopy at 4 weeks confirmed complete repopulation with endothelial cells in PDT, which was not seen in the control allografts.

Conclusions Our findings suggest that local PDT treatment of arterial allografts inhibits inflammatory infiltration, aneurysmal dilatation, and development of intimal hyperplasia and may be used to develop vascular bioprostheses for use in humans.


Key Words: photodynamic therapy • arteries • free radicals • allografts • rejection


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Autologous veins and textile-manufactured polymeric grafts play a fundamental role in the treatment of peripheral and coronary vascular disease. Nevertheless, as replacement for small-diameter (<6 mm) arteries, synthetic prostheses yield relatively low patency rates and therefore cannot be considered grafts for coronary artery bypass surgery. On the other hand, autologous veins may be unavailable or physically unsuitable in 8.5% to 35% of patients because of previous use or degeneration.1

Transplanted arteries have been part of the vascular surgeon's armamentarium for generations. Some of the earliest work in vascular reconstruction used tissue of both human and nonhuman origin.2 3 Bovine heterografts4 and cryopreserved human arterial and venous allografts5 6 have been tested as arterial bypass conduits. However, studies on arterial allografts revealed significant histological changes resulting from chronic rejection7 8 : shortly after implantation, infiltration of T cells and macrophages caused a severe inflammatory reaction, with breakdown and degeneration of the collagen-elastin network in the media. This event resulted in a loss of biomechanical stability with graft dilatation, aneurysm formation, and rupture. Furthermore, endothelial cell damage and later myointimal proliferation led to thrombus formation, anastomotic narrowing, and graft occlusion.

Problems relating to the elimination of graft antigens and preservation of vessel function are not as complex as those involved in organ transplantation. Viability of the implanted graft, although possibly desirable, is not a principal requirement. Therefore, vascular grafts of biological origin have been subjected to a wide variety of preservation or preparation techniques before implantation. These techniques included chemical stabilization,9 cryopreservation,4 5 6 lyophilization, and UV10 and gamma irradiation. However, there is no convincing evidence that any of these approaches provide a satisfactory long-term outcome.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a process that uses light to activate otherwise relatively inert photosensitizers for the production of free-radical moieties. After absorption of light, the photosensitizer is activated into an excited triplet state from which it can either directly form a free radical (type 1 reaction) or transfer its energy to molecular oxygen to generate singlet oxygen (type 2 reaction), both of which cause cell injury. These free radicals exert cytotoxic effects by damaging cellular membranes and organelles and cross-linking proteins.11 12

In experimental studies, PDT has been shown to inhibit intimal hyperplasia (IH) by cell depletion of the vessel wall without provoking an inflammatory response.13 14 Because vascular graft rejection is triggered primarily by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens in cells residing in the vessel wall,7 8 15 PDT was postulated as an innovative method to blunt or obviate immunologic responses by eliminating these cells. Therefore, this work was undertaken to investigate the effects of PDT on graft rejection in an allotransplantation model using rats of two histocompatibly disparate, high-responder, inbred strains.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experimental Design
Inbred ACI (RT1a) and Lewis (RT1l) rats (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc and Charles River Breeding Laboratories), weighing 270±60 g, were used as donors and recipients, respectively. The rats were anesthetized with intramuscular ketamine (75 mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg). After intravenous injection of heparin (200 U/kg), a segment of infrarenal aorta was resected and thoroughly rinsed with saline before use. All side branches in this segment were ligated, and a 1-cm graft was orthotopically implanted with interrupted 9/0 nylon sutures (Ethicon Inc). Surgery was performed under 10x to 20x magnification with an operating microscope (Edward Weck & Co). For all grafts, total ischemia time was approximately 50 minutes, during which the graft was kept in 4° C Hanks' buffered salt solution. Subcutaneous butorphanol (1 mg/kg) was administered as postoperative analgesic. Graft patency was evaluated by daily palpation of both femoral pulses and verified at harvest. While maintained in a standard 12-hour light/dark cycle, the rats had free access to standard rat chow (Purina rat chow 5001, Ralston Purina) and water. Animal care was in strict compliance with "Principles of Laboratory Animal Care" and the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" (NIH Publication No. 80-23, revised 1985). All procedures also were approved by an independent institutional animal care committee.

The rats were assigned to five different experimental groups: in the treatment group, PDT-treated ACI aortas were grafted in Lewis rats (PDT). Controls included nontreated (NT) and those treated with photosensitizer only (PO) and light irradiation only (LO) aortas. Syngeneic isotransplantations of untreated aortic grafts (ISO) were made from Lewis to Lewis rats, verified surgical changes, and served as negative control for the transplantation model. Rats from every group except NT and PO were killed sequentially at 2, 4, and 8 weeks. To minimize the number of animals, NT and PO rats were studied only at 8 weeks. For the whole study, 59 transplantations were performed.

Photodynamic Therapy
The photosensitizer chloroaluminum sulfonated phthalocyanine (CASPc, Ciba Geigy) was diluted to a concentration of 5 mg/mL in PBS and administered intravenously at a dose of 5 mg/kg 24 hours before explantation of PDT and PO grafts. Rats in the ISO, LO, and NT groups received an equivalent volume of saline solution. Rats receiving the photosensitizer without preimplantation laser irradiation (PO) had the aorta resected in low ambient light. Implantation of these grafts was performed under filtered illumination at a band pass of 440 to 600 nm to avoid photoactivation of CASPc, which was already present in the tissue of the allograft.

For irradiation of PDT and LO grafts, an argon-pumped dye laser (Coherent INNOVA I 100 and Coherent CR 599) was tuned to emit light at 675 nm and coupled to a 1-mm core silica fiber. With a 5-mm-focal-length lens, the output from the fiber optic was magnified to provide a uniform 2-cm spot and calibrated to an irradiance of 100 mW/cm2. The grafts were mounted on a bridged double microclamp (Pilling), placed on a reflective surface, and submerged in 5 µg/mL CASPc in PBS. Irradiations were performed at a fluence of 100 J/cm2 and included turning the graft over after 50% of the total energy was delivered. After PDT, the aortic grafts were gently rinsed with PBS and stored in 4°C Hanks' solution before implantation.

Harvest
Under anesthesia, the iliac artery was cannulated for blood pressure monitoring and perfusion fixation. Midgraft diameters were determined in the donor rat before explantation and in the recipient before euthanasia by use of a calibrated eyepiece in the operating microscope. After euthanasia, the aorta was flushed with saline and subsequently perfusion-fixed in situ at 80 mm Hg with 10% buffered formalin for light microscopy or 1.5% glutaraldehyde in cacodylate buffer for electron microscopy. The grafts were excised and placed in fresh 10% formalin or 4% glutaraldehyde, respectively. For immunohistochemistry, fresh grafts were excised, rinsed thoroughly with saline, and placed in Tissue Tek OCT compound (Miles Inc) before storage at -70°C.

Immunohistochemistry
Monoclonal anti-rat OX 47 antibody against T lymphocytes (Sera Lab) was used for immunohistochemical characterization of the inflammatory infiltrates. Cryosections (4 µm) were stained with the two-layer indirect immunoperoxidase technique.7 Briefly, the sections were air-dried for 30 minutes and subsequently fixed in acetone for 8 minutes. After incubation with primary antibody (1:1000), endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.3% H2O2 in PBS. After incubation with normal horse serum and rat-adsorbed, biotinylated horse anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Vector Laboratories), the sections were treated with diaminobenzidine (DAB Substrate Kit, Vector) and counterstained with nuclear fast red (Sigma Chemical Co). Normal arteries were used as negative controls; thymus tissue was used as positive control.

Morphological Studies
Formalin-fixed sections from three different graft segments (proximal, mid, and distal) were prepared with hematoxylin and eosin stain and Verhoeff's elastin stain. Morphometric evaluation was performed with a digitizing measurement system (Sigma Scan, Jandel Scientific) coupled to a camera lucida.13 The inflammatory response was assessed by scoring at least four microscopic fields for cellular infiltration at x400 magnification with the following arbitrary score: 0 (<5 cells per field), 1 (5 to 25 cells per field), or 2 (>25 cells per field).

Scanning Electron Microscopy
To determine differences in endothelialization and structure of the intimal surface between PDT and untreated allografts, scanning electron microscopy of longitudinal sections was performed at 4 weeks. After overnight fixation in buffered 4% glutaraldehyde, the specimens were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol. After critical-point drying and coating with a thin film of gold palladium, the sections were examined with a scanning electron microscope (Amray 1400).

Statistics
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. An ANOVA with Bonferroni's correction was used to compare morphometric parameters of the three untreated allograft controls: NT, LO, and PO. The inflammatory scores were analyzed with the {chi}2 test. Statistical analysis of the morphometric data was performed with a two-tailed Student's t test. Values of P<.05 were considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
All rats appeared healthy, without evidence of weight loss during the study. No skin photosensitivity was noted in the rats exposed to CASPc. All grafts were patent at harvest. Measured midgraft diameter values were corrected for rat growth (see the "Appendix"). At harvest, one NT and three LO grafts (16%) were noted to have aneurysmal degeneration (P<.001), defined as a diameter increase greater than 2.5 times the baseline. No aneurysms were observed in PDT or ISO. Macroscopically, there was evidence of perigraft inflammation, with scarring in all control allografts, predominantly at 4 and 8 weeks. At harvest, PDT allografts seemed to have thinner vessel walls with a transparent bluish hue compared with ISO grafts, which appeared unchanged.

Histological and Morphometric Analyses
No histological differences were observed between the NT, LO, and PO groups. Peaking at 4 weeks, LO grafts displayed a large number of lymphocytes infiltrating the adventitia and, to a lesser degree, the media and intima (Fig 1Down), which demonstrated positive labeling with the monoclonal antibody OX47 to T cells. At 2 and 4 weeks, an infiltration of white blood cells was also observed in both PDT and ISO (Figs 1Down and 2Down). Unlike NT, LO, and PO, however, the infiltrate in PDT and ISO consisted primarily of polymorphonuclear cells. At 8 weeks, this infiltrate persisted in the adventitia of PDT, whereas ISO presented without significant inflammation at this time point. There were no noticeable differences between the number of inflammatory cells in the proximal, mid, or distal graft segments.



View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Composite of photomicrographs depicting histological cross sections of rat aortic allografts. a through c, Control allografts (LO); d through f, photodynamic therapy–treated allografts. a and d show allografts 2 weeks after implantation: mononuclear cell infiltrates were seen in intima, media, and predominantly the adventitia (a), and endothelial cells are not visible (d). The media appears to be acellular and amorphous, and fibroblasts are sparsely colonizing the adventitia. b and e show allografts 4 weeks after implantation: severe inflammation of intima, media, and adventitia with beginning intimal hyperplasia can be seen (b), and complete reendothelialization of the luminal surface and an acellular media are depicted (e). c and f show allografts 8 weeks after implantation. Note less inflammation but marked intimal hyperplasia (c). f shows the beginning intimal hyperplasia, acellular, amorphous media and fibroblasts in the adventitia. Arrowheads depict internal elastic lamina. Arrows indicate external elastic lamina. Stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Magnification x365. Bar represents 50 µm.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Graph showing inflammation score at 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implantation. {circ} indicates photodynamic therapy–treated allograft; {blacktriangleup}, isograft; and {blacksquare}, control allograft. *P<.05 vs isograft in the respective time interval. Values are mean±SEM.

Inflammatory degeneration of the media with fragmentation of the internal elastic lamina was noted at 2 weeks and was highest at 8 weeks in LO. Elastic laminae were no longer in parallel orientation, and the space between the laminae was widened (Fig 3Down). Regardless of treatment or the time interval, all allografts demonstrated thinner medial layers than their respective isograft counterparts (Table 1Down). Smooth muscle cells in the media of LO diminished over time and were almost undetectable by 8 weeks. In PDT, however, smooth muscle cells were eliminated entirely from the media and could not be seen at any time (Fig 1Up). The media appeared to be compacted and acellular. An amorphous eosinophilic material was observed between the elastic laminae, and the internal elastic lamina remained intact. Although medial areas of non-PDT and PDT grafts were equivalent at 8 weeks (Table 1Down), external diameters of non-PDT grafts increased significantly, by approximately 47% versus 13% in PDT (P<.02, Table 2Down). In contrast, medial smooth muscle cells appeared to be viable in syngeneic controls, and medial areas and external diameters remained almost unchanged.



View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Composite of photomicrographs depicting histological cross sections of rat aortas. a, Normal thoracic Lewis rat aorta; b, isograft 8 weeks after implantation; c, photodynamic therapy–treated allograft 8 weeks after implantation; and d, control allograft 8 weeks after implantation. Note the fragmentation of elastic laminae and significant intimal hyperplasia. Stained with Verhoeff's elastin. Magnification x310. Bar represents 50 µm.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Intimal and Medial Areas


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Midgraft Diameters and Relative Diameter Changes at Explantation and 8 Weeks After Implantation

Intimal hyperplasia was present in LO at all time intervals, often unevenly distributed and mostly confined to graft segments near the proximal and distal anastomoses. The IH was hypercellular at 2 and 4 weeks, whereas by 8 weeks it was less cellular and contained mostly extracellular matrix. At 8 weeks, the intimal area was notably increased in LO with 0.23±0.02 mm2 versus 0.09±0.02 mm2 in PDT and 0.06±0.03 mm2 in ISO (P<.001). No significant IH was seen in PDT at 2 and 4 weeks.

Scanning electron microscopy at 4 weeks was used to examine endothelial morphology and repopulation of the luminal surfaces in PDT and untreated allografts. PDT demonstrated complete covering with normal-appearing endothelial cells, whereas untreated allografts presented with abundant platelets and rare erythrocytes adhering to denuded luminal surfaces (Fig 4Down).



View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Scanning electron micrographs depicting luminal surfaces of allografts 4 weeks after implantation. Top, Photodynamic therapy–treated allografts with normal-appearing endothelial cells, which completely line the graft intimal surface. Bottom, Control allograft with no visible endothelial cell lining of otherwise denuded luminal surface; erythrocytes, platelets, and fibrin adhere to basal membrane. Bar represents 10 µm.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
It is widely accepted that autologous artery or vein is the gold standard for small-diameter arterial reconstruction; no additional graft even closely rivals their patency performances.16 17 Because autologous grafts may not always be available, interest in bioprostheses from allografts and xenografts has resurfaced periodically over the past years.18 19 20 In fact, an aortic homograft was used for the first surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.21 However, viable exogenous tissue has been unsuitable so far for safe, long-term arterial replacement because of the associated chronic rejection process, which leads to graft dilatation, rupture, or occlusion. Endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells are probably the main antigenic targets in immunologic arterial wall remodeling.7 9 The underlying chronic immune response can be characterized by four important histopathological findings, which occur predominantly within the first 3 months after transplantation: inflammatory cells (1) invade the adventitia and (2) remain until all medial smooth muscle cells have disappeared, suggesting a relation between smooth muscle cell antigenicity and rejection process. Moreover, this chronic vascular injury leads to (3) matrix degeneration and appears to promote (4) intimal hyperplasia. Experimentally, the rejection process is self-limited for approximately 100 days,8 and the graft performance is then determined by the thrombogenicity of the luminal surface and the mechanical strength of the remodeled arterial scaffold.

To date, two avenues have been followed to overcome immunologic rejection in transplanted blood vessels: attenuation of immune responses in the host through immunosuppressive drugs22 23 24 and reduction of graft antigenicity with different preservation and preparation techniques.4 5 6 9 10 However, clinical trials applying either approach have not yet demonstrated an unequivocal reduction in the incidence of rejection. The use of immunosuppressants like cyclosporine may considerably reduce leukocyte infiltration or delay the development of intimal hyperplasia but cannot entirely suppress the rejection process.22 23 These drugs also pose additional risks and side effects and are poorly tolerated by the often polymorbid cardiovascular patients.24 Cryopreservation techniques, using liquid nitrogen vapor in conjunction with dimethyl sulfoxide, are the currently favored methods of maintaining viability and structural integrity of vascular grafts.5 6 Nevertheless, significant antigenicity of cryopreserved veins and arteries still represents a major obstacle to their widespread use.25 Application of fixatives like glutaraldehyde appears to induce nonspecific inflammatory responses in the adventitia and structural degradation and calcification of the graft. Additional cross-linking of extracellular matrix proteins leads to anastomotic compliance mismatch and subsequent intimal hyperplasia.9 Moreover, fixatives have not been able to homogeneously penetrate the full thickness of the arterial wall, resulting in nonuniform fixation.9

Another approach is decellularization of arterial allografts and xenografts induced by the detergent SDS.15 It reduced the immune injury with preservation of medial elastin in the presence of very few adventitial inflammatory cells. The presence of inflammatory cells, despite complete decellularization, was attributed to minor antigenicity of extracellular matrix components, which are not targeted by the detergent.

Our previous studies,13 which demonstrated PDT-induced depletion of cells and additional modification of the remaining extracellular matrix in the arterial wall, prompted this investigation by suggesting that PDT may significantly decrease graft antigenicity. PDT can be considered a specialized and targeted form of chemotherapy in which the drug itself is harmless unless activated by exposure to wavelength-specific light. Alternatively, PDT may also be considered an extension of radiotherapy in which, because of prior sensitization of the tissue, cytotoxicity is induced at much lower radiation energies than with conventional radiotherapy. Similar to ionizing radiation, the PDT effect occurs within a very short time frame and is localized to the irradiated field. Therefore, PDT appeared to be highly suitable for an ex vivo treatment under standardized conditions, right before graft implantation.

For the present study, the potent, water-soluble photosensitizer CASPc was used. In previous vascular PDT studies, this drug has been shown to possess advantageous properties for this application.13 14 26 Donor animals were injected with CASPc 24 hours before harvest, when they are still known to have elevated photosensitizer concentrations in the vessel wall.26 Loading of the allograft with in vivo exposure to CASPc in the donor was intended to induce an expeditious, uniform transmural distribution of the photosensitizer in the artery. In fact, a pilot study of PDT allografts (data not shown) that were pretreated with in vivo loading and harvested 1 day after transplantation displayed complete decellularization. However, it is unknown whether this result could have also been achieved by ex vivo immersion of the arteries in CASPc solution.

The 675-nm light used for PDT has excellent penetration in tissue and minimal attenuation in the millimeter range.27 Its low absorption and higher scattering coefficients render it highly suitable for the production of vascular grafts even in larger arteries.

MHC antigens in endothelial and medial smooth muscle cells are the primary targets of the rejection process in vascular grafts.7 Removal of the graft from the donor and acute rejection are responsible for the rapid destruction of the blood vessel endothelium.7 28 Hence, the remaining smooth muscle cells are the principal sites of chronic rejection in transplanted arteries.9 Because PDT leads to depletion of all cells in the vessel wall within 24 hours, potential histocompatibility antigen–bearing targets were thought to be absent shortly after implantation. It can therefore be inferred that infiltration of mononuclear cells, which would have indicated an ongoing rejection process, was obviated as a consequence of total smooth muscle cell eradication after PDT. However, assuming that the cells were still viable immediately after the PDT treatment and probably not completely eliminated at the time of implantation, one would have to expect many of the soluble products of cell lysis to be altered by PDT, dispersed before initiation of an immunologic response, or most likely both. At 8 weeks after implantation, a small number of polymorphonuclear cells still persisted in the adventitia of PDT grafts. The definite etiology and significance of this observation remain unclear. It can only be hypothesized that possible antigens in the extracellular matrix or cellular debris, which had not been targeted by the preceding PDT treatment, may have contributed to this inflammatory response.15

The structural integrity of the elastic laminae in PDT grafts remained intact at all time points, whereas untreated allografts demonstrated focal fragmentation (Fig 3Up). Although medial thickness in PDT and control allografts was equivalent, significant graft dilatation was seen only in control allografts. These data confirm previous findings that acknowledge the importance of mechanical stress to a thinner arterial wall but attribute aneurysmal dilatation primarily to immunologically induced destruction of medial elastin.15 Moreover, other studies on the effect of elastase and concomitant inflammation verified temporal correlation between inflammatory infiltrate, destruction of elastic laminae, and dilatation.29 30 Nevertheless, at 8 weeks, external diameters of PDT grafts increased by approximately 13%, whereas ISO remained almost unchanged. Although it cannot be ruled out that graft dilatation after PDT occurred on the basis of an insidious rejection process, previous studies corroborate intrinsic, PDT-induced diameter increases31 32 : by maintaining a "crimp" geometry of elastic fibers, smooth muscle cells reduce direct stresses on similarly aligned collagen. When smooth muscle cell tone is eliminated (eg, after PDT treatment), the vessel diameter increases, stiffer collagen fibers are directly stressed, and circumferential compliance is reduced.

In the present study, the area of IH in PDT at 2 weeks was significantly less compared with LO and at 4 weeks was equivalent to ISO and LO (Table 1Up). At 8 weeks, however, IH in PDT grafts, although almost unchanged to 4 weeks, was increased compared with ISO. A possible compliance mismatch between graft and adjacent arterial segments, caused by the loss of smooth muscle cell tone31 32 and the increased structural compactness of adventitial collagen after PDT,33 may contribute to the comparably larger intimal areas in PDT grafts by 8 weeks. The degree of compliance mismatch present in the graft body affects the amount of intimal hyperplasia that develops.34 Although compliance of the allografts was not evaluated, the inferred compliance differences may explain the development of moderate IH in PDT grafts.

As indicated by scanning electron microscopy, the luminal surface of PDT grafts was completely reendothelialized at 4 weeks. This finding suggests that PDT provides a nonthrombogenic luminal surface, which allows migration of repopulating endothelial cells and may help inhibit subsequent development of IH. The resulting decellularized graft, lined by endothelial cells that probably minimize thrombus formation, represents a prerequisite for satisfactory long-term graft performance. On the other hand, untreated control allografts, which present with no coherent endothelial cell lining but significant adhesion of platelets, are most likely prone to thrombus formation, intimal hyperplasia, and finally graft failure.

In conclusion, PDT pretreatment of allografts quantitatively suppressed histological markers of arterial wall immune injury: adventitial inflammation, aneurysmal dilatation, and the development of intimal hyperplasia. PDT seems to be a safe method of producing a biocompatible and nonthrombogenic arterial scaffold for use as a bypass graft. However, further studies of PDT and graft handling are needed to determine which role this novel approach will ultimately play in the development of vascular bioprostheses.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by NIH grant HL-02583 and Office of Naval Research contract N00014-91-C-0084. Dr Adili was awarded a fellowship grant by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ad 106/2-1). The contribution of suture material by Ethicon Inc and chloroaluminum sulfonated phthalocyanine by Ciba Geigy is appreciated.

The formulas to correct midgraft diameters for animal growth are as follows:


where CAn is the correction factor for midgraft diameter in one animal, D1p is the diameter of the host artery proximal to the graft at implant, D1d is the diameter of the host artery distal to the graft at implant, D2p is the diameter of the host artery proximal to the graft at harvest, and D2d is the diameter of the host artery distal to the graft at harvest.


where CExp is the mean correction factor for each experimental group (eg, PDT, LO, or ISO) and n is the number of observations in one experimental group.


where Dc is the corrected midgraft diameter at harvest and D2Mid is the measured midgraft diameter at harvest.

Received December 19, 1994; revision received March 6, 1995; accepted April 5, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Bosher LP. Fresh and preserved homograft vein as a vascular conduit. In: Wright CB, ed. Vascular Grafting: Clinical Applications and Techniques. Boston, Mass: John Wright; 1983:128-132.
  2. Carrel A. Heterotransplantation of blood vessels preserved in cold storage. J Exp Med. 1907;9:226-228. [Abstract]
  3. Guthrie CC. Structural changes and survival of cells in transplanted blood vessels. JAMA. 1908;50:1035-1036.
  4. Rosenberg N. The bovine arterial graft and its applications. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;142:104-108. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Boren CH, Roon AJ, Moore WS. Maintenance of viable arterial allografts by cryopreservation. Surgery. 1977;83:382-391.
  6. Sitzman JV, Imbembo AI, Ricotta JJ, McManama GP, Hutchins GM. Dimethyl sulfoxide treated cryopreserved venous allografts in the arterial and venous systems. Surgery. 1984;95:154-159. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Mennander A, Tiisala S, Halttunen J, Yilmaz S, Paavonen T, Hävry P. Chronic rejection in rat aortic allografts: an experimental model for transplant arteriosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:671-680. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Todd IA, Boctor ZN. Experimental homotransplantation of arteries. Transplantation. 1966;4:123-130. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Dumont CE, Plissonier D, Guettier C, Michel JB. Effects of glutaraldehyde on experimental arterial iso- and allografts in rats. J Surg Res. 1993;54:61-69. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Marin ML, Hardy MA, Gordon RE, Reemtsma K, Benvenisty AI. Immunomodulation of vascular endothelium: effects of ultraviolet B irradiation on vein allograft rejection. J Vasc Surg. 1990;11:103-111. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Henderson BW, Dougherty TJ. How does photodynamic therapy work? Photochem Photobiol. 1991;55:145-157.
  12. Verweij H, Dubbelman TMAR, Van Steveninck J. Photodynamic protein cross-linking. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981;647:87-94. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Ortu P, LaMuraglia GM, Roberts GW, Flotte TJ, Hasan T. Photodynamic therapy of arteries: a novel approach for treatment of experimental intimal hyperplasia. Circulation. 1992;85:1189-1196. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Grant WE, Speight PM, MacRobert AJ, Hopper C, Bown SG. Photodynamic therapy of normal rat arteries after photosensitisation using disulphonated aluminum phthalocyanine and 5-aminolaevulinic acid. Br J Cancer. 1994;70:72-78. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Allaire E, Guettier C, Bruneval P, Plissonier D, Michel JB. Cell-free arterial grafts: morphologic characteristics of aortic isografts, allografts and xenografts in rats. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19:446-456. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Fogle MA, Whittemore AD, Couch WP, Mannick JA. A comparison of in situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for infrainguinal reconstruction. J Vasc Surg. 1987;5:46-52. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Taylor LM, Edwards JM, Porter JM. Present status of reversed vein bypass: five-year results of a modern series. J Vasc Surg. 1990;11:193-205. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. DeBakey ME, Creech O Jr. Occlusive disease of the aorta and its treatment by resection and homograft replacement. Ann Surg. 1954;140:290-310.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Szilagyi DE, McDonald RT, Smith RF, Whitcomb JG. Biologic fate of human arterial homografts. Arch Surg. 1957;75:506-529.
  20. Szilagyi DE, Overhulse PR, Logrippo GA. Use of chemically sterilized arterial homografts. Clin Res. 1954;2:108-113.
  21. Dubost C, Allary M, Oeconomos N. A propos du tratement des anéurysmes de l'aorte: ablation de l'anéurysme: retablissement de la continuité par greffe de l'aorte humaine conservée. Mem Acad Chir (Paris). 1951;77:381-383. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Schmitz-Rixen T, Megerman J, Colvin RB, Williams AM, Abbott WM. Immunosuppressive treatment of aortic allografts. J Vasc Surg. 1988;7:82-92.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Steele DM, Hullett DA, Bechstein WO, Bechstein, Kowalski J, Smith LS, Kennedy E, Allison AC, Sollinger HW. Effects of immunosuppressive therapy on the rat aortic allograft model. Transplant Proc. 1993;25:755-756.
  24. Da Gama AD, Sarmento C, Vieira T, do Carmo GX. The use of arterial allografts for vascular reconstruction in patients receiving immunosuppression for organ transplantation. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20:271-278. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Perloff LJ, Rowlands DT, Barker CF. Studies of the modified venous allograft. Ann Surg. 1977;186:227-232. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. LaMuraglia GM, Ortu P, Flotte TJ, Roberts WG, Schomacker KT, ChandraSekar NR, Hasan T. Chloroaluminum sulfonated phthalocyanine partioning in normal and intimal hyperplastic artery in the rat: implications for photodynamic therapy. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:1898-1905. [Abstract]
  27. Cheong W, Prahl SA, Welch AJ. A review of the optical properties of biological tissues. IEEE J Quantum Electron. 1990;26:2166-2185.
  28. Galumbeck MA, Sanfilippo FP, Hagen PO, Seaber AV, Urbaniak JR. Inhibition of vessel allograft rejection by endothelial removal. Ann Surg. 1987;206:757-764. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Anidjar S, Salzmann JL, Gentric D, Lagneau P, Camilleri P, Michel JB. Elastase-induced experimental aneurysms in rats. Circulation. 1990;82:973-981. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Anidjar S, Dobrin PB, Eichorst M, Graham GP, Chejfec G. Correlation of inflammatory infiltrate with the enlargement of experimental aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1992;16:139-147. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. L'Italien GJ, ChandraSekar NR, LaMuraglia GM, Pevec WC, Dhara S, Warnock DF, Abbott WM. Biaxial elastic properties of rat arteries in vivo: influence of vascular wall cells and anisotropy. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:H574-H579. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. ChandraSekar NR, L'Italien GJ, Warnock DF, Dhara S, Abbott WM, LaMuraglia GM. Compliance and the effect of photodynamic therapy of arteries. Surg Forum. 1993;44:351-354.
  33. LaMuraglia GM, ChandraSekar NR, Flotte TJ, Abbott WM, Michaud N, Hasan T. Photodynamic therapy inhibition of experimental intimal hyperplasia: acute and chronic effects. J Vasc Surg. 1994;19:321-331. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Abbott WM, Megerman J, Hasson JE, L'Italien G, Warnock DF. Effect of compliance mismatch on vascular graft patency. J Vasc Surg. 1987;5:376-382.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
D. J. Granville, B. A. Cassidy, D. O. Ruehlmann, J. C. Choy, C. Brenner, G. Kroemer, C. van Breemen, P. Margaron, D. W. Hunt, and B. M. McManus
Mitochondrial Release of Apoptosis-Inducing Factor and Cytochrome c During Smooth Muscle Cell Apoptosis
Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2001; 159(1): 305 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
J. Heckenkamp and G. M. Lamuraglia
Intimal Hyperplasia, Arterial Remodeling, and Restenosis: An Overview
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1999; 11(2): 71 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Tojo, K. Niwaya, N. Sawabata, K. Kushibe, K. Nezu, S. Taniguchi, and S. Kitamura
Tracheal replacement with cryopreserved tracheal allograft: experiment in dogs
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1998; 66(1): 209 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LaMuraglia, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Flotte, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LaMuraglia, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Flotte, T. J.