(Circulation. 1995;92:950-961.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From The First Department of Medicine (M.K., T.M., K.N., K.K., M.H., T.K.), Osaka University School of Medicine, Osaka; Department of Physiology (Y.S., H.M.), Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara; Department of Physiology (H.K.), Osaka University School of Medicine, Osaka; and Department of Information Science (M.I.), Osaka University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Correspondence to Masafumi Kitakaze, MD, PhD, The First Department of Medicine, Osaka University School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita 565, Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results In 65 open-chest dogs, the left anterior
descending coronary artery was perfused through an
extracorporeal bypass tube from the left carotid artery. When
cilazaprilat (3 µg/kg per minute) was infused into the bypass tube
for 10 minutes after reduction of coronary blood flow due to
partial occlusion of the bypass tube, coronary blood flow
increased from 30±1 to 43±2 mL/100 g per minute despite there
being
no changes in coronary perfusion pressure (43±1 mm Hg). The
ratio of myocardial endocardial flow to epicardial flow increased
during an infusion of cilazaprilat. Both fractional shortening and
lactate extraction ratio of the perfused area were increased
(fractional shortening: 4.1±0.6% to 8.9±0.6%,
P<.001;
lactate extraction ratio: -55.7±3.3% to -36.7±3.9%,
P<.001). During an infusion of cilazaprilat, the bradykinin
concentration of coronary venous blood was markedly increased.
The increased coronary blood flow due to cilazaprilat was
attenuated by HOE-140 (an inhibitor of bradykinin
receptors; coronary blood flow: 35±2 mL/100 g per minute), and
by N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl
ester (an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase;
coronary blood flow: 34±2 mL/100 g per minute).
Intracoronary administration of bradykinin mimicked the
beneficial effects of cilazaprilat. Cyclic GMP content of the
coronary artery was increased by cilazaprilat compared with the
untreated condition in the ischemic myocardium. In
the denervated hearts, the increased coronary blood flow due to
cilazaprilat was not attenuated. On the other hand, CV11974, an
inhibitor of angiotensin II receptors, slightly
increased coronary blood flow to 34±2 from 30±1 mL/100 g per
minute.
Conclusions We conclude that an inhibitor of ACE can increase coronary blood flow and ameliorate myocardial ischemia, primarily due to accumulation of bradykinin and production of nitric oxide from the ischemic myocardium. Inhibition of angiotensin II production due to inhibition of ACE partially contributes to coronary vasodilation in the ischemic myocardium.
Key Words: angiotensin-converting inhibitor nitric oxide cilazaprilat myocardial ischemia bradykinin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thus, in the present study, to test the effect of an ACE
inhibitor on myocardial ischemia, we infused
cilazaprilat into the coronary artery during coronary
hypoperfusion and measured CBF and regional myocardial contractile and
metabolic functions. Furthermore, to examine the
possibility that this beneficial effect of cilazaprilat is attributable
to increases in NO release through accumulation of bradykinin, we
observed the changes in CBF and the regional contractile and
metabolic functions during HOE-14012 and
N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME) treatments.13 Finally, to investigate the
cellular mechanism of this phenomenon, we measured cyclic GMP of the
coronary smooth muscles with and without the administration of
cilazaprilat during myocardial ischemia.14
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These dogs were anesthetized with
pentobarbital sodium (30
mg/kg IV). The trachea was intubated, and the animal was ventilated
with room air mixed with oxygen (1 L/min). The chest was opened through
the left fifth intercostal space, and the heart was suspended in a
pericardial cradle. The left anterior descending coronary
artery (LAD) was cannulated and perfused with blood via the left
carotid artery through an extracorporeal bypass tube. Coronary
perfusion pressure (CPP) was monitored at the tip of the
coronary arterial cannula, and CBF of the perfused
area was measured with an electromagnetic flow probe attached at the
bypass tube. A small, short collecting tube (1-mm diameter and 7-cm
length) was inserted into a small coronary vein near the center
of the perfused area to sample coronary venous blood. The
drained venous blood was collected in the reservoir placed at the level
of the left atrium and was returned to the jugular vein. High-fidelity
left ventricular (LV) pressure was measured with a
micromanometer (Konigsberg P-5) placed in the LV
cavity through the apex. A pair of ultrasonic crystals were placed in
the inner third of the myocardium
1 cm apart to measure
myocardial segment length with an ultrasonic dimension gauge (5 MHz,
2-mm diameter; Schuessler). In five dogs, an electromagnetic flow probe
was attached at the root of the ascending aorta to measure cardiac
output.
Experimental Protocols
Protocol 1: Effects of
Cilazaprilat on Myocardial Ischemia
Produced by Coronary Hypoperfusion
Forty-one dogs were used in this
protocol. First, in 13 dogs,
after hemodynamic stabilization, coronary
arterial and venous blood samples were taken for blood gas
analysis and determination of lactate,
norepinephrine, and bradykinin concentrations and plasma
ACE activity. Hemodynamic parameters, ie,
LV pressure (LVP), dP/dt, and segment length of the perfused area, were
measured. End-diastolic length (EDL) was determined at the
R wave of the ECG, and end-systolic length (ESL) was determined at the
minimal dP/dt.18 Fractional shortening (FS) was calculated
by (EDL-ESL)/EDL as an index of myocardial
contractility of the perfused area. In 5 of 13 dogs,
cardiac output was measured. With an occluder attached at the
extracorporeal bypass tube, CPP was reduced so that CBF decreased to
one third of the control CBF. After a low CPP was determined, the
occluder was adjusted exactly to keep CPP constant at the low level.
All hemodynamic parameters were measured 3,
5, 7, and 10 minutes after the onset of hypoperfusion, and both
coronary arterial and venous blood for the
metabolic parameters were sampled at 10
minutes. After these measurements, cilazaprilat (3 µg/kg per minute;
Nippon Roche KK) was infused into the LAD, and all
hemodynamic and metabolic
parameters were measured again. Ten minutes later,
cilazaprilat infusion was discontinued, and the
hemodynamic and metabolic
parameters were obtained when hemodynamic
parameters were stabilized (n=13). For assessment of the
ratio of endocardial flow to epicardial flow (endo/epi flow ratio),
microspheres were injected before and 10 (ischemia
without cilazaprilat), 20 (ischemia with cilazaprilat), and 30
minutes (ischemia after withdrawal of cilazaprilat) after the
onset of coronary hypoperfusion. In the preliminary study, we
tested four dosages of cilazaprilat (0.33, 1, 3, and 9 µg/kg per
minute IC) during coronary hypoperfusion (n=3 in each dosage in
3 dogs). In the groups receiving cilazaprilat 0.33 to 3 µg/kg per
minute, CBF increased to 31±1, 37±2, and 42±2 from
29±2 mL/100 g
per minute during coronary hypoperfusion, and 9 µg/kg per
minute cilazaprilat increased CBF to 41±2 mL/100 g per minute.
Therefore, we decided to perform the experiments using 3 µg/kg per
minute cilazaprilat.
Second, to test that the effect of cilazaprilat is related to activation of the B2 receptors of bradykinin (n=6), we infused cilazaprilat into the LAD during hypoperfusion during an intracoronary infusion of HOE-140 (0.5 ng/kg per minute), a selective antagonist of bradykinin B2 receptors. The administration of HOE-140 was initiated 10 minutes before the coronary hypoperfusion.
Third, to test the direct effect of bradykinin on ischemic myocardium, we infused bradykinin instead of cilazaprilat into the LAD during hypoperfusion. During coronary hypoperfusion, all hemodynamic parameters were measured 3, 5, 7, and 10 minutes after the onset of hypoperfusion, and both coronary arterial and venous blood for the metabolic parameters were sampled at 10 minutes. After these measurements, bradykinin (20 ng/kg per minute) was infused into LAD, and all hemodynamic and metabolic parameters were measured 10 minutes later. After the measurements, bradykinin infusion was discontinued, and the hemodynamic and metabolic parameters were obtained when hemodynamic parameters were stabilized (n=5).
Fourth, since bradykinin is reported to increase the release of NO, we tested the idea that cilazaprilat increases NO and thus CBF via the activation of bradykinin receptors (n=8). Cilazaprilat was infused into the LAD during hypoperfusion during intracoronary infusion of L-NAME (3 µg/kg per minute), an inhibitor of NO synthase, to inhibit release of NO. Administration of L-NAME was initiated 10 minutes before coronary hypoperfusion.
Fifth, in six other denervated dogs, the identical procedures and measurements of all variables were performed in experiments with cilazaprilat. We confirmed that the norepinephrine concentrations in the myocardium in systemically denervated (n=5) and innervated control (n=5) dogs were 21±6 and 398±21 pg/mg (P<.001), respectively.
Protocol 2: Effects of an Antagonist of
Angiotensin II Receptors on Myocardial Ischemia
Produced by Coronary Hypoperfusion
Nine dogs were used in this
protocol. After
hemodynamic stabilization, coronary
arterial and venous blood were sampled for blood gas
analysis and determination of lactate and
norepinephrine concentrations. Hemodynamic
functions were measured as in protocol 1. With an occluder attached at
the extracorporeal bypass tube, CPP was reduced so that CBF decreased
to one third of the control CBF. After a low CPP was determined, the
occluder was adjusted exactly to keep CPP constant at the low level.
All hemodynamic parameters were measured 3,
5, 7, and 10 minutes after the onset of hypoperfusion. After these
measurements, CV11974 (10 µg/kg per minute; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co)
was infused into the LAD, and all hemodynamic
parameters were measured again (n=6). Ten minutes later,
CV11974 infusion was discontinued, and hemodynamic
parameters were obtained when they were stabilized. In the
preliminary study, we tested the effects of 3.3, 10, and 33 µg/kg per
minute of CV11974 on CBF during coronary hypoperfusion. Three
dosages of CV11974 increased CBF to 31±1, 35±1, and 34±2
from 29±1
mL/100 g per minute (n=3 for each dosage) with constant CPP
(CPP=42±1
mm Hg). Thus, we decided to use 10 µg/kg per minute of CV11974 in
this protocol.
Protocol 3: Effects of Cilazaprilat on
Coronary Circulation
in the Nonischemic Myocardium
To examine the effects of cilazaprilat
on CBF in the normoxic
condition, we infused three dosages of cilazaprilat (1, 3, and 9
µg/kg per minute) into five dogs. After the
hemodynamic stabilization, CBF was measured before and
during infusion of each dose of cilazaprilat. Coronary
arterial and venous blood were sampled for the measurement
of bradykinin concentration.
Protocol 4: Effects of
Cilazaprilat on Cyclic GMP Content of
Epicardial Coronary Artery in Ischemic
Hearts
We tested whether cilazaprilat increases cyclic GMP content of
the coronary artery in the ischemic
myocardium. With an occluder attached at the extracorporeal
bypass tube, CPP was reduced so that CBF decreased to one third of the
control CBF. After a low CPP was determined, the occluder was adjusted
to keep CPP constant at the low level. After the low CPP was maintained
for 10 minutes, cilazaprilat (3 µg/kg per minute) was infused into
the LAD for 10 minutes, and we rapidly removed the epicardial LAD
(ischemic region) and left circumflex coronary artery
(nonischemic control region) (n=5) with the use of
precooled stainless steel scissors and tongs. We rapidly stored samples
in liquid nitrogen. In five other dogs, CPP was reduced so that CBF
decreased to one third of the control CBF for 20 minutes, and the
epicardial LAD (ischemic region) and left circumflex
coronary artery (nonischemic control region) were
rapidly removed and stored in liquid nitrogen.
Measurements of Regional Coronary Blood Flow
Regional
myocardial blood flow was determined by the
microsphere technique as previously reported19
with the use of nonradioactive microspheres (Sekisui Plastic
Co) made of inert plastic labeled with different types of stable heavy
elements as described in detail previously.16 In the
present study, microspheres labeled with Nb, Br, Zr, and I
were used. The mean diameter was 15 µm, and specific gravity was 1.32
for Nb, 1.34 for Br, 1.36 for Zr, and 1.60 for I. Microspheres
were suspended in isotonic saline with 0.01% Tween 80 to prevent
aggregation. The microspheres were ultrasonicated for 5 minutes
followed by 5 minutes of voltexing immediately before injection.
Approximately 1 mL of the microsphere suspension (2 to
4x105 spheres) was injected into the left atrium followed
by several warm (37°C) saline flushes (5 mL).
The x-ray fluorescence activity of stable heavy elements was measured by a wavelength dispersive spectrometer (PW 1480, Phillips Co). Specification of this x-ray fluorescence spectrometer has been described previously. In brief, when the microspheres are irradiated by the primary x-ray beam, the electrons fall back to a lower orbit and emit measurable energy. This energy level of the x-ray fluorescence depends on the characteristics for each element. Therefore, it was possible to qualify the x-ray fluorescence of several differently labeled microspheres in the mixture. The endo/epi flow ratio was calculated as the ratio of each tissue content normalized with the wet weight of the sampled myocardium.
Chemical Analysis
M
O2 (mL/100 g per
minute) was
calculated as: CBF (mL/100 g per minute)xcoronary
arterial and venous blood oxygen difference (mL/dL).
Lactate was assessed by the enzymatic assay, and lactate extraction
ratio (LER) was obtained by multiplying the coronary
arteriovenous difference in lactate concentration by 100 and dividing
by arterial lactate concentration.
Norepinephrine Measurement
The method of norepinephrine measurement has been
described previously.20 Five milliliters of
coronary arterial and venous blood taken into a
tube containing EDTA was immediately placed in ice water and
centrifuged for 20 minutes. The plasma was kept at -80°C.
Within 2 weeks, plasma norepinephrine was adsorbed on
alumina and separated by high- performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) (pump, LC-3A; column Zpax-SCX;
Shimazu Seisakusho Co). Plasma norepinephrine was
determined spectrofluorometrically by the trihydoxyindole (THI) method
(spectrofluorophotometer RF-500LCA, Shimazu). In this system,
sensitivity of the assay is 10 pg/mL plasma and the intra-assay
coefficient of variation is 6.8%.20
Bradykinin
Measurement
The method of bradykinin measurement has been described
previously.21 One milliliter of blood withdrawn from the
sampling tube was squirted rapidly into siliconized polyethylene tubes
containing 4 mL of 96% ethanol, which was centrifuged at
2500g at 4°C for 15 minutes. The supernatant was decanted
into a siliconized 250-mL round-bottomed flask. The precipitate was
resuspended in 20 mL 75% ethanol and recentrifuged. This
supernatant was combined with the previous supernatant. After 0.5 mL of
octanol was added to prevent frothing, the ethanol was removed, and the
volume was reduced to
2 mL through evaporation at 60°C under the
reduced pressure. The residual solution was acidified with 5 mL of 0.01
mol/L HCl and partitioned twice with 20 mL of diethyl ether. This
procedure was performed in the same flask as the original evaporation,
with the ether supernatant being removed by suction after each
partitioning. The aqueous phase remaining in the flask after the ether
extractions was subsequently reduced to dryness using a rotary
evaporator. These dried samples were stored at -80°C before assay.
The dried samples were redissolved in 2.5 mL of 0.1 mol/L Tris-HCl
buffer containing 0.2% gelatin, 0.1% neomycin, and 0.01 EDTA,
adjusted to pH 7.4. The incubation mixture for radioimmunoassay
consisted of 0.1 mL of 0.01 mol/L 1,10-phenanthroline HCl, diluent
buffer of 0.5 mL containing the unknown or standard bradykinin, 0.1 mL
antiserum diluted 1:600 with diluent buffer, and 0.1 mL
(125I-Try8)-bradykinin (approximately 8000 cpm)
dissolved in normal saline. It was incubated in a polyethylene tube at
4°C for 24 hours, and dextran-coated charcoal was used to separate
the free labeled antigen from that bound to antibody. Three replicate
tubes containing only buffer, phenanthroline, and
(125I-Try8)-bradykinin were incubated and
treated with coated charcoal to determine the amount of labeled antigen
that remained in the supernatant in the absence of antibody. The mean
value of this measurement was subtracted from supernatant radioactivity
after centrifugation of the antibody-containing tubes,
and the resultant value was used to calculate the proportion of label
bound to antibody.
Cyclic GMP Measurement
The
method of cyclic GMP measurement in tissue has been
previously described.22 After removal of the adventitial
connective tissues in the coronary arteries (20 to 40 mg), the
frozen tissue was powdered, homogenized at 4°C in 1 mL of
ice-cold 6% trichloroacetic acid, and centrifuged at
2500g for 20 minutes. The supernatant fluid was removed,
extracted three times with 3 mL of diethyl ether saturated with water,
and stored in the freezer (-80°C). Cyclic GMP concentration in the
supernatant fluid was measured by the radioimmunoassay
method22 within 7 days. Briefly, we used 100 µL of
dioxane-triethylamine mixture containing succinic acid anhydride
succinylated cyclic GMP in the supernatant (100 µL). After a
10-minute incubation, the reaction mixture was added to 800 µL of 0.3
mol/L imidazole buffer (pH 6.5). One hundred microliters of succinyl
cyclic GMP tyrosine methyl ester iodinated with
125I (15 000 to 20 000 cpm in <10-14 mol/L)
was added to the assay mixture containing 100 µL of the supernatant
and 100 µL of diluted antisera in the presence of chloramine
T22 ; the mixture was kept at 4°C for 24 hours. A cold
solution of dextran-coated charcoal (500 µL) was added to the mixture
in an ice-cold water bath. The charcoal was spun down, and 0.5 mL of
the supernatant was counted for radioactivity in a gamma spectrometer.
The amount of cyclic GMP was normalized by protein content of
coronary artery assayed by the Lowry
method.23
Measurement of Plasma ACE Activity
The method of measurement of the plasma ACE activity has been
described previously.24 Three milliliters of
coronary arterial and venous blood taken into a
polyethylene tube was immediately placed in ice water and
centrifuged for 20 minutes. The plasma was kept at -80°C.
Within 7 days, plasma ACE activity was assessed by measuring the
production of hippuric acid from the substrate (Hip-His-Leu).
The concentration of hippuric acid was measured by
colorimetric methods24 using HPLC with a
Model Tri-Rotor (Japan Spectroscopic Co).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with
paired
t tests adjusted by the modified Bonferroni's multiple
comparison.25 26 All values were expressed as
mean±SEM,
with P<.05 considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Effects of Inhibition of ACE on Myocardial
Ischemia
Table 2
shows the changes in CPP, CBF, and the
bradykinin concentration of coronary arterial and
venous blood during infusions of cilazaprilat (0.33, 1, 3, and 9
µg/kg per minute) in the nonischemic condition.
Intracoronary infusions of 0.33, 1, and 3 µg/kg per
minute of cilazaprilat did not change CBF but slightly increased the
bradykinin concentration of coronary venous blood at 3 µg/kg
per minute of cilazaprilat. An intracoronary infusion of 9
µg/kg per minute of cilazaprilat slightly increased CBF with a
further increment of the bradykinin concentration.
|
Table
3
shows the coronary
hemodynamic and metabolic
parameters before the reduction of CPP. There were no
significant differences in the baseline coronary
hemodynamic and metabolic
parameters of the nonischemic condition.
Neither L-NAME nor HOE-140 altered the coronary
hemodynamic and metabolic
parameters. In the denervated myocardium,
M
O2 in the baseline
condition was
significantly reduced compared with the baseline condition in the
cilazaprilat group. Fig 1
shows the effect of
cilazaprilat on CBF and FS during coronary hypoperfusion. After
an abrupt reduction of CPP, CBF decreased from 91±2 to 30±1
mL/100 g
per minute, and FS decreased within 1 minute keeping a steady state for
10 minutes (5.1±0.6%). Within 1 minute, once CPP was set, CPP was
kept constant at 43±1 mm Hg. After the initiation of an
intracoronary infusion of cilazaprilat, both CBF and FS
gradually increased. Ten minutes after the onset of the cilazaprilat
infusion, both CBF and FS increased to 43±2 mL/100 g per minute and
8.9±0.6%, respectively, indicating that an intracoronary
infusion of cilazaprilat increases both CBF and FS of the
ischemic myocardium. Table 4
depicts
cardiac output before and during coronary hypoperfusion.
Cardiac output was reduced due to coronary hypoperfusion, and
cilazaprilat administration increased cardiac output during
coronary hypoperfusion. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was
decreased due to coronary hypoperfusion; however, SVR did not
change regardless of whether cilazaprilat was administered during
coronary hypoperfusion. Fig 2
shows the endo/epi
flow ratio during coronary hypoperfusion with and without
administration of cilazaprilat. Before the reduction in CPP, endo/epi
flow ratio was 1.17±0.07. The endo/epi flow ratio decreased to
0.74±0.03, and administration of cilazaprilat significantly increased
endo/epi flow ratio to 0.81±0.01. This result indicates that
cilazaprilat increases CBF in the endocardium more than the epicardium.
This beneficial effect of cilazaprilat was demonstrated from the aspect
of myocardial metabolism. Fig 3
shows the
changes in LER, M
O2, and
coronary arterial and venous concentrations of
norepinephrine during ischemia with and without
cilazaprilat. Cilazaprilat increased LER, indicating that myocardial
anaerobic metabolism was improved by the
cilazaprilat infusion, and thus
M
O2
increased. There were no significant differences in
norepinephrine concentrations in the coronary
venous blood. Norepinephrine release (coronary
arteriovenous differences in norepinephrine multiplied by
CBF [ng/100 g per minute]) in the control condition and in the
ischemic myocardium before, during, and after
administration of cilazaprilat were 2.44±0.83, 1.12±0.75,
0.71±1.45,
and 1.07±1.03 ng/100 g per minute, respectively. There were no
significant differences in norepinephrine release among
these four conditions. pH in coronary venous blood was
7.38±0.01 at baseline and decreased (P<.001) to
7.22±0.02
during coronary hypoperfusion. However, the cilazaprilat
infusion improved (P<.005) pH in coronary venous
blood (7.31±0.01). pH of coronary arterial blood
did not change throughout this study (7.40±0.02). There were no
significant differences in plasma ACE activity in the coronary
arterial blood in the control condition and in the
ischemic myocardium before, during, and after
administration of cilazaprilat (5.6±0.9, 5.8±0.8,
5.6±0.9, and
5.4±0.8 IU/L, respectively). Plasma ACE activities in the
coronary venous blood in the control and ischemic
myocardium were 5.5±0.9 and 5.9±0.5 IU/L, respectively.
Cilazaprilat administration markedly reduced plasma ACE activity in the
coronary venous blood to 0.2±0.1 IU/L during coronary
hypoperfusion (P<.001), and plasma ACE activity returned to
5.0±1.0 IU/L 10 minutes after withdrawal of cilazaprilat
infusion.
|
|
|
|
|
Mechanisms by Which Cilazaprilat Increases CBF and Improves
Myocardial Ischemia
Fig 4
shows the coronary
arteriovenous
differences in the concentration of bradykinin during coronary
hypoperfusion with and without cilazaprilat administration. In the
nonischemic condition, the coronary arteriovenous
difference in the bradykinin concentration was -2.1±2.5 pg/mL. In
the
ischemic condition, the coronary arteriovenous
difference in the bradykinin concentration increased, and
administration of cilazaprilat further increased the coronary
arteriovenous difference in the bradykinin concentration. Fig 5
shows the effect of bradykinin on CBF and FS during
coronary hypoperfusion. After an abrupt reduction of CPP
associated with CBF, FS decreased within 1 minute, keeping a steady
state for 10 minutes. Within 1 minute, once CPP was set, it was kept
constant. Ten minutes after the onset of the bradykinin infusion, both
CBF and FS increased to 46±4 mL/100 g per minute and 9.7±1.0%,
respectively, indicating that an intracoronary infusion of
bradykinin can increase both CBF and FS of the ischemic
myocardium. Fig 6
shows the changes in LER,
M
O2, and coronary
arterial and venous concentrations of
norepinephrine during ischemia with and without
bradykinin administration. Bradykinin increased LER, indicating that
myocardial anaerobic metabolism was improved by
the bradykinin infusion, and thus
M
O2
increased. There were no significant differences in
norepinephrine concentrations in the coronary
venous blood. There also were no differences between
norepinephrine release in the control condition and in the
ischemic myocardium before, during, and after
administration of bradykinin (2.10±0.98, 1.40±0.93,
1.73±1.39, and
1.38±0.98 ng/100 g per minute, respectively).
|
|
|
Fig
7
shows that these beneficial effects of
cilazaprilat are antagonized by concomitant treatment with HOE-140.
Intracoronary infusion of cilazaprilat during
administration of HOE-140 slightly increased both CBF and FS during
coronary hypoperfusion with the constant low CPP. The increases
in CBF (12.8±1.1 versus 2.8±0.9 mL/100 g per minute) and FS
(4.8±0.2% versus 0.7±0.2%) were attenuated by 78% and 85%
relative to the group of the cilazaprilat administration (Fig
1
). Fig 8
shows the changes in LER,
M
O2, and coronary
arterial and venous concentrations of
norepinephrine during ischemia with and without
cilazaprilat during administration of HOE-140. Cilazaprilat slightly
increased LER. There were no significant differences in
M
O2 and norepinephrine
concentrations in the coronary arterial and venous
blood. There also were no differences between
norepinephrine release in the control condition with and
without HOE-140 administration (1.63±1.13 and 1.95±0.69 ng/100 g
per
minute, respectively) and in the ischemic
myocardium before, during, and after administration of
cilazaprilat (0.79±0.41, 0.25±0.47, and 1.33±0.25 ng/100
g per
minute, respectively). pH in the coronary venous blood was
7.37±0.01 at baseline and decreased to 7.22±0.01 during
coronary hypoperfusion. However, the cilazaprilat infusion did
not improve pH in coronary venous blood (7.24±0.01). These
results indicate that HOE-140 attenuates the beneficial effects of
cilazaprilat on myocardial ischemia by
80%, indicating that
the beneficial effect of cilazaprilat is mainly attributable to the
accumulation of bradykinin in the ischemic
myocardium.
|
|
Because bradykinin is reported to increase NO production in
endothelial cells, we tested whether L-NAME attenuates
the beneficial effects of cilazaprilat in the ischemic
myocardium. Fig 9
shows that L-NAME
treatment attenuates the cilazaprilat-induced increases in CBF
(12.8±1.4 versus 4.0±0.7 mL/100 g per minute) and FS
(4.8±0.2%
versus 1.2±0.4%) during the constant low CPP by 69% and 75%,
respectively. Fig 10
shows the changes in LER,
M
O2, and coronary
arterial and venous concentrations of
norepinephrine during coronary hypoperfusion with
and without cilazaprilat during treatment with L-NAME. Cilazaprilat
slightly increased LER and
M
O2. There
were no significant differences in norepinephrine
concentrations in the coronary arterial and venous
blood. There also were no differences between
norepinephrine release in the control condition with and
without L-NAME administration (3.01±1.99 and 2.97±1.03 ng/100 g
per
minute, respectively) and in the ischemic
myocardium before, during, and after administration of
cilazaprilat (1.75±0.62, 2.63±0.69, and 1.55±0.72 ng/100
g per
minute, respectively). pH in coronary venous blood was
7.38±0.01 at baseline and decreased to 7.21±0.01 during
coronary hypoperfusion. However, the cilazaprilat infusion did
not improve the pH in coronary venous blood (7.25±0.02). These
results indicate that the beneficial effect of cilazaprilat is mostly
attributable to augmentation of NO release due to the bradykinin
accumulation. To examine whether NO increases CBF of the
ischemic myocardium by its direct coronary
vasodilatory action or by attenuation of norepinephrine
release, we tested the effects of cilazaprilat in the denervated
ischemic myocardium. Fig 11
shows
the effect of cilazaprilat on CBF and FS during coronary
hypoperfusion in the denervated myocardium. After an abrupt
reduction of CPP associated with CBF, FS decreased within 1 minute
keeping a steady state for 10 minutes. Ten minutes after the onset of
the cilazaprilat infusion, both CBF and FS increased to the levels in
the cilazaprilat group in the innervated control
myocardium (Fig 1
). Fig 12
shows the
changes in LER, M
O2, and
coronary arterial and venous concentrations of
norepinephrine during ischemia with and without
cilazaprilat in the denervated myocardium. Cilazaprilat
increased LER, indicating that myocardial anaerobic
metabolism was also improved in the denervated
myocardium, and thus M
O2
increased. There were no significant differences in
norepinephrine concentration in the coronary venous
blood. There also were no differences between
norepinephrine release in the control condition and in the
ischemic myocardium before, during, and after
administration of cilazaprilat (1.50±2.14, 0.49±0.33,
1.61±2.63, and
1.41±0.52 ng/100 g per minute, respectively).
|
|
|
|
The remaining 20%
to 30% of the beneficial effects of cilazaprilat
may be attributable to the inhibition of angiotensin II
receptors. Therefore, we tested whether inhibition of
angiotensin II receptors can account for the remaining 30%
of the beneficial effect of cilazaprilat. Fig 13
shows
that CV11974 increases CBF and FS by 4.0±0.5 mL/100 g per minute and
1.7±0.3%, respectively, despite the constant low CPP. CV11974
increased LER from -52.5±4% to -43.2±2.2%
(P<.05) but
did not change M
O2
(1.6±0.1 to
1.7±0.1 mL/100 g per minute). CV11974 did not alter the concentrations
of norepinephrine in the coronary
arterial (from 393±21 to 404±20 pg/mL) and venous blood
(from 417±11 to 411±16 pg/mL). There also were no differences
between
norepinephrine release in the control condition and in the
ischemic myocardium before, during, and after
administration of CV11974 (2.79±2.05, 0.80±1.05,
2.84±1.00, and
0.71±0.83 ng/100 g per minute, respectively).
|
Table
5
represents the cellular basis of the
interaction between cilazaprilat and NO. Without cilazaprilat
treatment, myocardial ischemia (CPP: 105±4 to 42±2 mm Hg,
CBF: 82±3 to 27±2 mL/100 g per minute) increased cyclic GMP
content
of the coronary artery from 69±5 to 126±7 fmol/mg protein
(P<.01). However, treatment with cilazaprilat during
myocardial ischemia further increased (P<.01)
cyclic GMP content of the involved coronary artery to 272±16
fmol/mg protein.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Validity of the Experimental Model in the Present
Study
The major assumption in all of the experimental protocols in the
present study was that intracoronary infusion of
chemicals, such as cilazaprilat, L-NAME, HOE-140, and CV11974, does not
have any effects on peripheral vessels, and the observed
changes in the LAD area were due only to local effects on the
coronary vasculature. If pharmacological interventions to the
LAD area also affect systemic hemodynamics, the
beneficial effects of cilazaprilat may be secondary to the systemic
vascular effects such as afterload reduction. However, in the
present study, systolic and diastolic blood pressures
and heart rate did not change during any pharmacological interventions
(Table 1
), suggesting that pharmacological interventions to the
LAD
area minimally affect the systemic hemodynamic
parameters in the present study. Furthermore, when
intracoronary administration of 3 µg/kg per minute
cilazaprilat markedly reduced plasma ACE activity in the
coronary venous blood, this administration of cilazaprilat did
not affect the plasma ACE activity in the coronary
arterial blood. Indeed, intracoronary
cilazaprilat administration did not affect SVR (Table 4
). These
observations strengthen the idea that the beneficial effects of
cilazaprilat are attributable to the local coronary vascular
and myocardial changes rather than the systemic
hemodynamic changes.
Coronary Vasodilation due to Inhibition of ACE in the
Ischemic Hearts
ACE inhibitors inhibit the accumulation of
angiotensin II and accumulate bradykinin in the
myocardium. First, because angiotensin II is
reported to promote the release of norepinephrine from the
presynaptic vesicles, ACE inhibitors may decrease the
release of norepinephrine from the presynaptic
vesicles,28 and the subsequent withdrawal of
-adrenoceptor activation in the ischemic
myocardium would cause coronary vasodilation.
However, in our experiment there is evidence that cilazaprilat during
coronary hypoperfusion does not alter the
norepinephrine concentration in the coronary venous
blood (Fig 2
), and the beneficial effects of cilazaprilat were
not
blunted in the denervated ischemic myocardium (Figs 11
and
12
). These observations suggest that withdrawal of sympathetic
nerve activity is not likely for the mechanisms of the coronary
vasodilation in the ischemic myocardium.
Second, angiotensin II also directly constricts the coronary smooth muscles,2 which may constitute the mechanisms for coronary vasodilation in the ischemic heart. However, CV11974, an inhibitor of angiotensin II receptors, increased CBF only by 20% to 30% of cilazaprilat-induced increases in CBF, suggesting that inhibition of angiotensin II accumulation is not the major factor.
Third, because our results revealed that bradykinin accumulation due to cilazaprilat administration is a major factor for coronary vasodilation and improvement of myocardial contractile and metabolic functions in the ischemic myocardium, the direct coronary vasodilation due to bradykinin may be a primary factor. Bradykinin is reported to relax vascular smooth muscles,9 and our data revealed that bradykinin increases CBF during coronary hypoperfusion and improves ischemic myocardium.
Fourth, bradykinin-induced coronary vasodilation may be involved in increases in NO production5 6 7 8 or accumulation of prostacyclin.29 The present study revealed that L-NAME, an inhibitor of NO synthase, attenuates the cilazaprilat-induced coronary vasodilation to the same extent as HOE-140, indicating that the coronary vasodilation due to bradykinin during administration of cilazaprilat is attributable to NO accumulation. Because NO is known to be a potent coronary vasodilator,30 31 32 33 it is likely that NO-induced coronary vasodilation is a major cause for the cilazaprilat-induced coronary vasodilation in the ischemic myocardium. Furthermore, coronary arterial content of cyclic GMP, which is increased by NO via guanylate cyclase activation, was increased by administration of cilazaprilat during coronary hypoperfusion.
Aside from the NO-induced coronary vasodilation, NO can inhibit platelet aggregation and neutrophil adherence to coronary vasculature.34 35 36 If this is the case, increased CBF may be attributable to the inhibition of progressive platelet aggregation and neutrophil adherence. However, this may be unlikely, because even during administration of L-NAME, both CBF and FS remained constant at low levels during coronary hypoperfusion without progressive decreases, suggesting that progressive platelet aggregation and adherence of neutrophils may not occur in the ischemic hearts even without cilazaprilat in the present experimental protocols. NO accumulation due to an intracoronary infusion of cilazaprilat also may open functional collateral vessels to the ischemic area, which may reduce the severity of ischemia. We cannot negate this possibility; however, increases in CBF measured at the bypass tube suggest that forward flow into the coronary artery is essentially increased due to cilazaprilat. Taken together, cilazaprilat increases CBF in the ischemic heart through NO production via augmentation of accumulation of bradykinin.
Role of Bradykinin for Coronary Vasodilation in the
Ischemic Heart
Results of the present study also indicate that
endo/epi flow
ratio during myocardial ischemia is increased due to
administration of cilazaprilat, suggesting that bradykinin accumulation
or NO production due to bradykinin is more prominent in the
endocardium than the epicardium. In the kidney, the formation of kinins
is reported to be H+ dependent,37 suggesting
that H+ may increase bradykinin concentration in the
tissues. If this is the case in the ischemic heart, endocardium
may produce H+ more than epicardial myocardium
because epicardial flow is slightly less than the endocardium, although
myocardial oxygen consumption in the endocardium is more than in the
epicardium. Bradykinin accumulation measured in the coronary
venous effluent in the ischemic myocardium was more
than twice that in the nonischemic myocardium
when cilazaprilat was administered in the coronary artery. This
difference in the bradykinin accumulation may be attributable to the
differences in H+ accumulation in the
myocardium. Furthermore, it has been reported that
Ca2+ concentration in the endocardium is higher than
that in the epicardium, and ischemia elevates myocardial
Ca2+ concentrations.38 The rise in
Ca2+ may affect release of bradykinin and activity
of NO synthase, which may account for the higher endocardial flow and
higher accumulation of bradykinin in the ischemic
myocardium. In addition, activation of
1-adrenoceptor activation produces a >40-fold increase
in the rate of kallikrein secretion, and the kinin output in the venous
effluent from the submandibular gland becomes 700-fold,39
suggesting that
1-adrenoceptor stimulation, which occurs
during myocardial ischemia, augments the increases in
bradykinin accumulation.
Although our results indicate that coronary
arteriovenous
differences in bradykinin concentrations are increased (Table 1
and Fig 4
), this extent of increases in bradykinin may
minimally affect
hemodynamic parameters, because it is
reported that several nanograms per milliliter of bradykinin are
necessary to affect the hemodynamic
parameters.40 However, bradykinin is very
fragile and degrades rapidly in the blood, suggesting that bradykinin
concentration near the vessel wall may be very high to cause
substantial vasodilation. During administration of cilazaprilat in the
nonischemic myocardium (Table 1
), although
release of bradykinin was increased, CBF did not increase at 3 µg/kg
per minute cilazaprilat. When CPP varies in the range of
coronary flow autoregulation, coronary vasodilatory or
constrictive response may be overwhelmed by other vasoactive
substances. Another possible explanation for the discrepancy between
the concentrations of bradykinin and CBF in the nonischemic
myocardium may be the shape of their dose-response
relation.
Clinical Implications
It has been reported that ACE
inhibitors are effective
for attenuation of infarct size after myocardial ischemia and
reperfusion.41 42 Martorana et
al41 42
reported that ACE inhibitors attenuate infarct size from
55% to 25%. Furthermore, ACE inhibitors are effective for
promoting remodeling of ventricle after the acute myocardial
infarction, which prevents enlargement of the ventricle.43
The present study helps to clarify the role of bradykinin in the
beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors in the canine
experimental model of ischemic heart disease, although further
basic and clinical research must be performed to investigate the
possible use of ACE inhibitor in the treatment of effort
angina.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 4, 1995; accepted February 7, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Drimal J. Effects of angiotensin II on coronary smooth muscle. Eur J Pharmacol. 1968;5:56-62. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Erdos EG, Skdgel RA. The angiotensin-I converting enzyme. Lab Invest. 1987;56:345-348. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Erdos EG. Angiotensin I converting
enzyme and changes in our concepts through the years.
Hypertension. 1990;16:363-370.
5. Wolfgang L, Gabriele W, Bernward AS. ACE-inhibition induces NO-formation in cultured bovine endothelial cells and protects isolated ischemic rat hearts. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1992;24:909-919. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Schini VB, Boulanger C, Regoli D, Vanhoutte PM.
Bradykinin stimulates the production of cyclic GMP via
activation of B2 kinin receptors in cultured porcine aortic
endothelial cells. J Pharmacol
Exp Ther. 1990;252:581-585.
7.
Arnold WP, Mittal CK, Katsuki S, Murad F.
Nitric oxide activates guanylate cyclase and
increased guanosine 3:5'-cyclic monophosphate levels in various tissue
preparation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977;74:3203-3207.
8.
Pelc LR, Garrett JG, David CW. Mechanism of
coronary vasodilation produced by bradykinin.
Circulation. 1991;83:2048-2056.
9. Regoli D, Barabe J. Pharmacology of bradykinin and related kinins. Pharmacol Rev. 1980;32:1-46. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Janina SW, Owen LW. Kinin receptors mediating the effects of bradykinin on the coronary circulation in anesthetized greyhounds. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991;196:9-14. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Creager MA, Halperin JL, Bernard DB, Faxon DP,
Melidossina CD, Bavras H, Ryan TJ. Acute regional circulatory
and renal hemodynamic effects of converting-enzyme
inhibition in patients with congestive heart failure.
Circulation. 1981;64:483-489.
12. Rhaleb NE, Rouissi N, Jukic D, Regoli D, Henke S, Breipohl G, Knolle J. Pharmacological characterization of a new highly potent B2 receptor antagonist (HOE140: D-Arg-[Hyp3,Thi5,D-Tic7,Oic8]bradykinin). Eur J Pharmacol. 1992;210:115-120. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
McMahon TJ, Hood JS, Kadowitz PJ.
Pulmonary vasodilator response to vagal stimulation is
blocked by N
-nitro-L-arginine
methyl ester in the cat. Circ Res. 1992;70:364-369.
14.
Johns RA, Peach MJ, Linden J, Tichotsky A.
NG-Monomethyl
L-arginine inhibits endothelium-derived
relaxing factor-stimulated cyclic GMP accumulation in cocultures of
endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells by an
action specific to the endothelial cell.
Circ Res. 1990;67:979-985.
15.
Gauthier P, Nadeau R, Champlain J. Acute and
chronic cardiovascular effects of
6-hydroxydopamine in dogs. Circ
Res. 1972;31:207-217.
16.
Acad BA, Joselevitz-Goldman J, Scholz PM, Weiss HR.
Improved distribution of regional oxygenation in
denervated ischemic dog myocardium.
Circ Res. 1988;62:1041-1048.
17.
Kitakaze M, Hori M, Gotoh K, Sato H, Iwakura K,
Kitabatake A, Inoue M, Kamada T. Beneficial effects of
2-adrenoceptor activity on ischemic
myocardium during coronary hypoperfusion in
dogs. Circ Res. 1989;65:1632-1645.
18. Abel FL. Maximal negative dP/dt as an indicator of end of systole. Am J Physiol. 1981;240:H676-H679.
19.
Mori H, Haruyama S, Shinozaki Y, Okino H, Iida A,
Takanashi R, Sakura I, Husseini W, Payne B, Hoffman JIE. New
nonradioactive microspheres and more sensitive x-ray
fluorescence to measure regional blood flow. Am J
Physiol. 1992;263:H1946-H1957.
20.
Sato H, Inoue M, Matsuyama T, Ozaki H, Shimazu T,
Takeda H, Ishida Y, Kamada T. Hemodynamic
effects of the ß1-adrenoceptor partial agonist xamoterol
in relation to plasma norepinephrine levels during exercise
in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Circulation. 1987;75:213-220.
21. Mashford ML, Roberts ML. Determination of blood kinin levels by radioimmunoassay. Biochem Pharmacol. 1972;21:2727-2735. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Honma M, Satoh T, Takezawa J, Ui M. An ultrasensitive method for the simultaneous determination of cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP in small volume samples from blood and tissue. Biochem Med. 1977;18:257-273. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ.
Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent.
J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265-275.
24.
Kasahara Y, Ashihara Y.
Colorimetry of angiotensin-1
converting enzyme activity in serum. Clin Chem. 1981;27:1922-1926.
25. Winer BJ. Statistical Principles In Experimental Design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc; 1982:1-907.
26. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press; 1972:258-298.
27.
James RP. Cardioprotection by
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors: the
experimental evidence. Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:183-189.
28. de Jonge A, Thoolen MJMC, Timmermanns PBMWM, van Zweiten PA. Interaction of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors with the sympathetic nervous system. Prog Pharmacol. 1984;5:25-38.
29. van Gilst WH, van Wijngaarden J, Scholtens E, de Graeff PA, de Langen CDJ, Wesseling H. Captopril-induced increase in coronary flow: an SH-dependent effect on arachidonic acid metabolism? J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;9(suppl 2):S31-S36.
30. Furchgott RF, Zawadzki JV. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature. 1980;288:373-376. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Ignarro LJ, Buga GM, Wood KS, Byrns RE, Chaudhuri G.
Endothelium-derived relaxing factor produced and
released from artery and vein is nitric oxide. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:9265-9269.
32. Bassenge E, Heusch G. Endotherial and neuro-humoral control of coronary blood flow in health and disease. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1990;116:77-165. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Dirk JD, Robert JB. Inhibition of nitric oxide
production aggravates myocardial hypoperfusion during exercise
in the presence of a coronary artery stenosis.
Circ Res. 1994;74:629-640.
34.
Sneddon JM, Vane JR.
Endothelium-derived relaxing factor reduces
platelet adhesion to bovine endothelial
cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:2800-2804.
35. Mollace V, Salvemini D, Anggard E, Vane J. Nitric oxide from vascular smooth muscle cells: regulation of platelet reactivity and smooth muscle cell guanylate cyclase. Br J Pharmacol. 1991;104:633-638. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Wright CD, Mulsch A, Busse R, Osswald H. Generation of nitric oxide by human neutrophils. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;160:813-819. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Guillermo AS, Mario AD, Oscar AC. Effect of pH and amiloride on the intrarenal formation of kinins. Am J Physiol. 1983;245:F198-F203.
38.
Vincent MF, Rolf B, Michael WW, Barry MM, Albert SC.
Endocardial versus epicardial differences of intracellular free
calcium under normal and ischemic conditions in perfused rat
hearts. Circ Res. 1993;72:1082-1090.
39.
Rabito SF, Orstavik TB, Scicli AG, Schork A, Carretero
OA. Role of the autonomic nervous system in the release of rat
submandibular gland kallikrein into the circulation.
Circ Res. 1983;52:635-641.
40. Salgado MCO, Rabito SF, Carretero OA. Blood kinin in one-kidney, one clip hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1986;8(suppl I):I-110-I-113.
41. Linz W, Martorana PA, Scholkens BA. Local inhibition of bradykinin degradation in ischemic hearts. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;15:S99-S109.
42. Martorana PA, Kettenbach B, Breipohl G, Linz W, Scholkens BA. Reduction of infarct size by local angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is abolished by a bradykinin antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol. 1990;182:395-396. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Christina B, Mark AM. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on ventricular remodeling and survival following myocardial infarction. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27:755-766.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Yoshizawa, S. Maeda, A. Miyaki, M. Misono, Y. Choi, N. Shimojo, R. Ajisaka, and H. Tanaka Additive beneficial effects of lactotripeptides and aerobic exercise on arterial compliance in postmenopausal women Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): H1899 - H1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Trescher, M. Bauer, W. Dietl, S. Hallstrom, N. Wick, M. Wolfsberger, R. Ullrich, G. Jurgens, E. Wolner, and B. K. Podesser Improved myocardial protection in the failing heart by selective endothelin-A receptor blockade J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2009; 137(4): 1005 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Duncker and R. J. Bache Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow During Exercise Physiol Rev, July 1, 2008; 88(3): 1009 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kakoki, R. W. McGarrah, H.-S. Kim, and O. Smithies Bradykinin B1 and B2 receptors both have protective roles in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury PNAS, May 1, 2007; 104(18): 7576 - 7581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Toda, K. Ayajiki, and T. Okamura Interaction of Endothelial Nitric Oxide and Angiotensin in the Circulation Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2007; 59(1): 54 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Asanuma, T. Minamino, S. Sanada, S. Takashima, H. Ogita, A. Ogai, M. Asakura, Y. Liao, Y. Asano, Y. Shintani, et al. {beta}-Adrenoceptor Blocker Carvedilol Provides Cardioprotection via an Adenosine-Dependent Mechanism in Ischemic Canine Hearts Circulation, June 8, 2004; 109(22): 2773 - 2779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yada, M. Goto, O. Hiramatsu, H. Tachibana, E. Toyota, H. Nakamoto, Y. Ogasawara, H. Matsuda, K. Arakawa, K. Hayashi, et al. In vivo visualization of subendocardial arteriolar response in renovascular hypertensive hearts Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2003; 284(5): H1785 - H1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Podesser, J. Schirnhofer, O. Y. Bernecker, A. Kroner, M. Franz, S. Semsroth, B. Fellner, J. Neumuller, S. Hallstrom, and E. Wolner Optimizing Ischemia/Reperfusion in the Failing Rat Heart--Improved Myocardial Protection With Acute ACE Inhibition Circulation, September 24, 2002; 106(12_suppl_1): I-277 - I-283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Korn, A. Kroner, J. Schirnhofer, S. Hallstrom, O. Bernecker, R. Mallinger, M. Franz, H. Gasser, E. Wolner, and B. K. Podesser Quinaprilat during cardioplegic arrest in the rabbit to prevent ischemia-reperfusion injury J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2002; 124(2): 352 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kitakaze, H. Asanuma, H. Funaya, K. Node, S. Takashima, S. Sanada, M. Asakura, H. Ogita, J. Kim, and M. Hori Angiotensin-converting enzymeinhibitors and angiotensin iireceptor blockers synergistically increasecoronary blood flow in canine ischemic myocardium: Role of bradykinin J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 3, 2002; 40(1): 162 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sanada, M. Kitakaze, K. Node, S. Takashima, A. Ogai, H. Asanuma, Y. Sakata, M. Asakura, H. Ogita, Y. Liao, et al. Differential Subcellular Actions of ACE Inhibitors and AT1 Receptor Antagonists on Cardiac Remodeling Induced by Chronic Inhibition of NO Synthesis in Rats Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 404 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. S. Wittstein, D. A. Kass, P. H. Pak, W. L. Maughan, B. Fetics, and J. M. Hare Cardiac nitric oxide production due to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition decreases beta-adrenergic myocardial contractility in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2001; 38(2): 429 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Figueroa, A. Marchant, U. Novoa, U. Forstermann, K. Jarnagin, B. Scholkens, and W. Muller-Esterl Differential Distribution of Bradykinin B2 Receptors in the Rat and Human Cardiovascular System Hypertension, January 1, 2001; 37(1): 110 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. I. Jugdutt, Yi Xu, M. Balghith, R. Moudgil, and V. Menon Cardioprotection Induced by AT1R Blockade After Reperfused Myocardial Infarction: Association With Regional Increase in AT2R, IP3R and PKC{varepsilon} Proteins and cGMP Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 2000; 5(4): 301 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Schneider, E. Voth, D. Moka, F. M. Baer, J. Melin, A. Bol, R. Wagner, H. Schicha, E. Erdmann, and U. Sechtem Improvement of myocardial blood flow to ischemic regions by angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibition with quinaprilat IV: A study using [15O] water dobutamine stress positron emission tomography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1005 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Matoba, T. Tatsumi, N. Keira, A. Kawahara, K. Akashi, M. Kobara, J. Asayama, and M. Nakagawa Cardioprotective Effect of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Against Hypoxia/Reoxygenation Injury in Cultured Rat Cardiac Myocytes Circulation, February 16, 1999; 99(6): 817 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jalowy, R. Schulz, H. Dorge, M. Behrends, and G. Heusch Infarct size reduction by AT1-receptor blockade through a signal cascade of AT2-receptor activation, bradykinin and prostaglandins in pigs J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 1998; 32(6): 1787 - 1796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kupatt, H. Habazettl, S. Zahler, C. Weber, B. F Becker, K. Messmer, and E. Gerlach ACE-inhibition prevents postischemic coronary leukocyte adhesion and leukocyte-dependent reperfusion injury Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 1997; 36(3): 386 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sambuceti, M. Marzilli, P. Marraccini, J. Schneider-Eicke, E. Gliozheni, O. Parodi, and A. L'Abbate Coronary Vasoconstriction During Myocardial Ischemia Induced by Rises in Metabolic Demand in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, June 17, 1997; 95(12): 2652 - 2659. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Node, M. Kitakaze, H. Kosaka, T. Minamino, and M. Hori Bradykinin Mediation of Ca2+-Activated K+ Channels Regulates Coronary Blood Flow in Ischemic Myocardium Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1560 - 1567. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Node, M. Kitakaze, H. Kosaka, K. Komamura, T. Minamino, M. Inoue, M. Tada, M. Hori, and T. Kamada Increased Release of NO During Ischemia Reduces Myocardial Contractility and Improves Metabolic Dysfunction Circulation, January 15, 1996; 93(2): 356 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |