(Circulation. 1995;92:881-885.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, and the Variety Club Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Correspondence to Dr L.N. Benson, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X8.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Fifty-five balloon-expandable stents were implanted in 42 patients 6.1±4.7 years of age. Patients were followed prospectively (median, 15 months) and recatheterized 1 year after implantation. Thirty-eight patients had the implants positioned percutaneously (49 implants), while 4 patients (6 implants) had intraoperative implantations. There was a diameter increase in the stenotic area of 109±79% (P<.0001) and a gradient reduction of 74±26% (P<.0001). Twelve stents straddled the orifice of side-branch pulmonary arteries and reduced flow to the branch vessel acutely in 7 patients. Twenty-nine patients underwent recatheterization, and various degrees and locations of acquired intraluminal narrowing were observed in all cases, particularly in areas of diameter mismatch between the stented and nonstented vessels. Eleven patients had further dilation with diameter improvement. Of the 38 patients who underwent percutaneous implantation, planned surgery for pulmonary artery stenosis was avoided in 33 and deferred in 4 patients. One patient who was considered inoperable had stent implantation as a palliative procedure. Symptomatic improvement was reported in 27 patients, and 15 patients remained asymptomatic.
Conclusions Endovascular stents have a role in the treatment of pulmonary artery stenoses and positively affect clinical care. The stenosis relief, however, may be tempered by the development of intraluminal stent obstruction, which may require redilation (15 of 55 stents) and mandates long-term follow-up.
Key Words: stents stenosis heart defects congenital catheterization pediatrics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Method of Implantation
Cardiac catheterization was performed
under
general anesthesia. Selective pulmonary artery
angiography was obtained in axial projections to maximize
stenosis profile and pulmonary artery topography. Care
was taken to note the position of branching vessels and their relation
to the stenosis. The largest stent that could be delivered
safely was chosen to allow the potential for future dilation. The
technique for implantation was described in detail
previously.3 In brief, stents were mounted on 8-, 10-, or
12-mm-diameter low-profile balloons (Mansfield Scientific) and directed
to straddle the lesions with an 8F, 10F, or 11F long sheath guide (with
built-in backbleed taps, Cook Inc) over a 0.035-in extrastiff exchange
interventional wire (Amplatz type, Cook Inc). After initial placement,
further stent enlargement with a larger-diameter balloon was performed
to eliminate any residual stenosis. Dilations were attempted to
conform to the configuration of the pulmonary vessel both
proximally and distally, with attempts made to avoid overdistention of
the pulmonary artery segment. During the course of the
procedure, the activated clotting time was adjusted to 250 seconds
after an intravenous dose of 150 U/kg heparan sulfate.
After catheterization, heparin sulfate was administered
intravenously at 10
U · kg-1 · h-1 for 24 hours,
and
acetylsalicylic acid 3 to 5
mg · kg-1 · d-1 was prescribed
for 6
months.
Follow-up Protocol
Before stent implantation, patients
underwent routine
precatheterization noninvasive assessment and lung perfusion
scans. After implantation, patients were assessed clinically, with
chest radiography and pulmonary perfusion scans
at 6 months and with repeated cardiac catheterization
at 1 year. Follow-up catheterizations were performed
with patients under sedation (narcoleptic technique), and attempts were
made to match angiographic projections used at the time of
implantation. Dilation was repeated when there was an observed
intraluminal obstruction, growth of a proximal or distal vessel, or a
persistent narrowing within the stent caused by residual vessel
stenosis. Depending on the mechanism and degree of the noted
obstructions, balloon diameters were of the same size or 2 to 3 mm
larger than that used at implantation. Pulmonary artery and
stent measurements were determined from the cineangiograms
with electronic calipers, with the known angiographic catheter diameter
used to calculate the magnification correction factor.
Statistics
Results are expressed as mean±SD or median
with range. Because
changes in dimensions, hemodynamic
parameters, and lung perfusion scans were not uniformly
collected over all time periods, repeated-measures ANOVA could not be
applied. Therefore, selected comparisons were made with paired
Student's t tests with
increased to P<.01
to minimize the probability of a type I error with multiple
comparisons. The number of subjects for each statistical comparison is
also given.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Acute Results
Optimal stent positioning, defined as
straddling the
stenotic lesion in the center of the implant and avoiding
protrusion of the stent into the main pulmonary artery or the
orifice of a side branch, was achieved in 53 of 55 individual implants.
Mean stenosis diameter was 5±2 mm (n=46), increasing to
10±3
mm (n=48) after implantation (mean increase, 109±79%;
P<.0001; Fig 1A
). Peak systolic pressure
gradients fell from 28±21 to 7±9 mm Hg (n=45;
P<.0001;
mean decrease, 74±26%; Fig 1B
), and right ventricular
systolic pressure fell from 48±18 to 41±14 mm Hg (n=24;
P<.001; Fig 1C
). The ratios of right
ventricular to systemic pressure decreased from 0.56±0.22
(n=21) to 0.48±0.16 (n=13) (mean decrease,
25±18.9%; n=11;
P=.0007). Twelve stents straddled the orifice of side-branch
pulmonary arteries. In 5 implants, flow into these side
branches was unaffected; in 7 implants, reduced flow was noted after
implantation.
|
Complications
One patient developed distal left pulmonary
artery
thrombosis and was treated successfully with intravenous
thrombolytic therapy. This event was thought to be due to
prolonged balloon inflation (malfunction in balloon deflation) and low
flow to the involved branch. One stent that was placed into the
proximal left pulmonary artery and protruded into the main
pulmonary artery (by >50%) was removed and replaced at a
subsequent catheterization. A further stent migrated to
a left lower lobe branch and was dilated in place, leaving no residual
obstruction to other side-branch pulmonary arteries.
Follow-up
Median follow-up was 15 months (range, 1 to 36
months).
Symptomatic improvement was noted in 27 patients (improved
exercise tolerance by history), whereas 15 patients remained
asymptomatic. Surgery for pulmonary artery
stenosis was avoided in 33 of the 38 patients undergoing
percutaneous stent implantation; 4 patients had planned
cardiac surgery for additional cardiac lesions simplified by stent
implantation. The remaining of these 38 patients, considered inoperable
because of multiple peripheral pulmonary
stenoses, had stent implantation as a palliative procedure,
which improved perfusion to the stented lung.
Twenty-nine patients
underwent recatheterization 10±4
months after implantation. The narrowest (minimal) endoluminal diameter
was 8±2 mm (32 implants, Fig 1A
), systolic pressure
gradient was
18±17 mm Hg (35 implants, Fig 1B
), and right ventricular
systolic pressure was 41±14 mm Hg (from 19 patients, Fig
1C
). Right
ventricular end-diastolic pressures had no
significant change from before stent implantation (8.5±2.8 mm Hg,
n=17) to follow-up catheterization (8.8±2.9 mm Hg,
n=17) in these patients. Ten patients with unilateral obstructions had
lung perfusion scans before and after (5.2±2.6 months) implantation.
The mean percentage of flow to the ipsilateral lung increased from
28±13% to 40±16% (n=6; P<.005) for left
pulmonary artery implants, whereas no significant change was
observed (32±25% to 42±11%, n=4) for right pulmonary
artery
stents. Comparison of the angiographic and hemodynamic
findings at follow-up to those immediately after stent
implantation, available in 26 implants, showed a 20±21% decrease in
the lumen diameter (from 10±2 to 8±2 mm; P<.0001), a
nonsignificant increase in mean systolic pressure gradient of
198±240% (from 6±9 to 15±14) in 27 implants, and no
significant
increase in right ventricular pressure (14 patients) or in
ratios of right ventricular to systemic pressure (9
patients). Restenosis was significantly higher in small stents,
with a diameter decrease of 40±7% (n=4) for 15x1.8-mm
stents and
37±20% (n=5) for 20x2.5-mm stents compared with
9±20% (n=17) for
30x3.4-mm stents (P=.001).
Selective angiography
identified endoluminal tissue ingrowth of various
degrees in all stents. Various patterns of intimal growth were noted
(Fig 2
) that involved the proximal or distal stent,
where the implant was larger than the adjacent vessel diameter (n=18);
a focal ingrowth at the site of the previous artery stenosis
(n=3); or a diffuse pattern of growth (n=2). Of the 7 branch
pulmonary arteries that were traversed by a stent with an
apparent reduction in flow, persistent reduction was noted in 6
arteries, and 1 appeared fully patent. The 5 remaining branch arteries
that were crossed by a stent with no change in flow remained fully
patent (see Fig 3
).
|
|
Redilation of 16 stents was
attempted in 11 patients as a result
of significant restenosis using standard pressure balloons,
questioning whether the stents could be enlarged reducing the
gradients, and noting the appearance of the intimal ingrowth after
expansion. The diameter of the narrowest area within the stent was
increased from 7±2 to 10±2 mm (52±47% enlargement;
n=16;
P<.0001; Fig 1A
), systolic pressure gradient
decreased from
23±13 to 14.1±12.3 mm Hg (52±26% reduction; n=15;
P<.0001; Fig 1B
), and right ventricular
systolic pressure decreased from 41±14 to 37±9 mm Hg
(4±35%
reduction; n=8; P=NS; Fig 1C
). No stent
demonstrated
thrombosis formation, migration, aneurysm formation, or
calcification.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The objective of intravascular stenting is to provide a framework to avoid vessel recoil and support the vessel wall, eliminating the stenosis. Anticipated full surface neoendothelialization, a process that develops rapidly within the first 3 weeks after implantation, then protects against thrombosis.7 Initial surface endothelialization evolves through various stages. Within days to weeks of implantation, a thrombotic layer covering the stent struts is progressively replaced by a fibromuscular tissue layer, forming a surface for neoendothelial ingrowth. The later progression of events is thought to decline with time, becoming quiescent years after placement.7 8
The efficacy of stent relief of such obstructions and the safety of implantation were discussed in a number of recent publications.2 3 4 One issue that remains unanswered, however, is the pattern of endoluminal growth in stents within the pulmonary circulation. Early experimental studies identified a uniform neoendothelial cell layer covering stents placed in piglet pulmonary arteries,1 but examinations were performed only 3 months after implantation. From one large previously reported series,4 only 1 of 25 recatheterized patients was found to have hemodynamic or angiographic evidence of restenosis (at the junction of two stents implanted in tandem), while the majority of stents showed very mild (1- to 2-mm) wall thickening; in addition, the site of maximal ingrowth was not detailed. From studies of stented adult coronary arteries, restenosis tissue consists of proliferating smooth muscle cells that grow over the stent wires and subsequently reendothelialize.9
This report supports previous early observations after stent implantation.3 4 In this setting, the acute success rate was 96%, and clinical management was favorably influenced in 95% of patients. Our observations suggest that such implants do positively affect patient treatment algorithms by alleviating symptoms, improving pulmonary hemodynamics, and enlarging branch vessels to the degree that surgical enlargement can be avoided. Furthermore, those patients with only mildly elevated right ventricular pressures (eg, unilateral obstruction) and pulmonary insufficiency might benefit from vessel enlargement, reducing the degree of regurgitation by increasing the perfused pulmonary vascular bed; in this small series, however, right ventricular end-diastolic pressure remained unchanged at follow-up. This could improve hemodynamics in the right side of the heart by decreasing ventricular volume and could improve exercise performance. Whether this is a reality requires further investigation in this population. In addition, in a majority of patients, anticipated surgery was avoided and symptoms were improved as a result of the procedure. Although small stents have limited dilation potential and increased risk of restenosis, they appeared useful in delaying surgery in younger patients for which additional lesions would require future surgical intervention. Considerable care must be exercised in the application of these smaller implants in that expansion, although beneficial in the short-term, has long-term consequences. In such situations, however, the stent could be either removed or opened lengthwise at surgery and patch-enlarged at a later date. Acute complications were few and could be managed medically; no emergency surgery resulting from the implant was required.
Medium-term angiographic follow-up demonstrated wall thickening within the stent lumen of various degrees, occurring primarily in areas where there was an abrupt variation in vessel-to-lumen diameter after implantation. With overdilation, vessel endothelium denuded and separated; cells within this injured area multiplied and migrated to replace cells within the denuded zone. Such stationary cell replication creates a hyperplastic regeneration zone.10 Finally, the difference in diameters between the stented and the nonstented vessels creates heightened shear forces that vary with the compliance of these two areas. High shear forces activate platelets, which adhere to the vessel wall and release mitogenic factors that stimulate subendothelial cells in the vicinity of the adjacent vascular wall to proliferate and migrate.10 In two cases in which no diameter differences between the stented and nonstented vessels were observed, a diffuse pattern of mild intimal growth was noted. This may suggest that when there is no flow acceleration (as when there are no diameter differences and no residual focal narrowing), the lumen narrowing will be minimal.
Stent implantation into the central right or left
pulmonary artery may compromise flow to branch vessels arising
at angles from the stented segments. Although flow reduction to such
branches might be the result of the underlying disease
(stenosis of the origin of the crossed side vessel before stent
implantation), it more likely results from mechanical distortion
created by the stent implantation. Experimental studies in stented
pulmonary arteries from pigs and clinical observations would
suggest that this is not related to endothelial growth
over stent strut members or a strut thrombus obstructing
flow1 (Fig 4
). Such findings may be related
to entrapment of the side-branch orifices by the strut, acutely
occluding or compromising the orifice by compression. In one case, flow
to the branch pulmonary artery improved at follow-up, which
suggested the possibility of vasospasm contributing to flow
reduction.
|
Study Limitations
A limitation of this study was the
diversity of
congenital heart lesions addressed by the implant that may affect the
pulmonary vascular bed differently. In addition, the follow-up
time (median, 15 months) may be too short, and changes in the intimal
growth patterns or the hemodynamics may evolve further.
Although objective data were gathered prospectively, clinical decisions
regarding patient management in this population were examined
retrospectively, hence introducing bias into the study.
Received December 21, 1994; revision received February 2, 1995; accepted February 19, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
O'Laughlin MP, Perry SB, Lock JE, Mullins CE.
Use of endovascular stents in congenital heart disease.
Circulation. 1991;83:1923-1939.
3. Hosking MCK, Benson LN, Nakanishi T, Burrows PE, Williams WG, Freedom RM. Intravascular stent prosthesis for right ventricular outflow obstruction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:373-380. [Abstract]
4.
O'Laughlin MP, Slock MC, Grifka RG, Perry SB, Lock
JE, Mullins CE. Implantation and intermediate-term follow-up of
stents in congenital heart disease.
Circulation. 1993;88:605-614.
5. Rothman A, Perry SB, Keane JF, Lock JE. Early results and follow-up of balloon angioplasty for branch pulmonary artery stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:1109-1117. [Abstract]
6. Hosking MCK, Thonaidis C, Hamilton R, Burrows PE, Freedom RM, Benson LN. Clinical impact of balloon angioplasty for branch pulmonary arterial stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:1467-1470. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Palmaz JC. Intravascular stents: tissue-stent
interactions and design consideration. Am J
Roentgenol. 1993;160:613-618.
8. Bair RE, Duthon RC. Initial events in interaction of blood with a foreign surface. J Biomed Mater Res. 1969;3:191-206. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Schatz RA, Baim DS, Leon M, Ellis SG, Goldberg S,
Hirshfeld JW, Cleman MW, Cabin HS, Walker C, Stagg J, Buchbinder M,
Teirstein PS, Topol EJ, Savage M, Perez JA, Curry RC, Whitworth H,
Sousa JE, Tio F, Almagor Y, Ponder R, Penn IM, Leonard B, Levine SL,
Fish RD, Palmaz JC. Clinical experience with the Palmaz-Schatz
coronary stent: initial results of a multicenter study.
Circulation. 1991;83:148-161.
10. Herring BM. Endothelial seeding of blood surfaces. In: Wright CB, ed. Vascular Grafting. Littleton, Mass: PSG Publishing; 1983:275-314.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Lurz, J. Nordmeyer, V. Muthurangu, S. Khambadkone, G. Derrick, R. Yates, M. Sury, P. Bonhoeffer, and A. M. Taylor Comparison of Bare Metal Stenting and Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation for Treatment of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction: Use of an X-Ray/Magnetic Resonance Hybrid Laboratory for Acute Physiological Assessment Circulation, June 16, 2009; 119(23): 2995 - 3001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Maglione, L. Bergersen, J. E. Lock, and D. B. McElhinney Ultra-High-Pressure Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Resistant Stenoses Within or Adjacent to Previously Implanted Pulmonary Arterial Stents Circ Cardiovasc Interv, February 1, 2009; 2(1): 52 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. M. Hijazi and S. M. Awad Pediatric Cardiac Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., December 1, 2008; 1(6): 603 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lurz, L. Coats, S. Khambadkone, J. Nordmeyer, Y. Boudjemline, S. Schievano, V. Muthurangu, T. Y. Lee, G. Parenzan, G. Derrick, et al. Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation: Impact of Evolving Technology and Learning Curve on Clinical Outcome Circulation, April 15, 2008; 117(15): 1964 - 1972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Mitropoulos, H. Laks, N. Kapadia, M. Gurvitz, D. Levi, R. Williams, and M. Plunkett Intraoperative Pulmonary Artery Stenting: An Alternative Technique for the Management of Pulmonary Artery Stenosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 84(4): 1338 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Boshoff, N. Bethuyne, M. Gewillig, L. Mertens, B. Eyskens, I. Bakir, E. Verbeken, W. Daenen, and B. Meyns Endovascular stenting of juvenile vessels: consequence of surgical stent removal on vessel architecture Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2007; 28(8): 1033 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. van Gameren, M. Witsenburg, J. J.M. Takkenberg, D. Boshoff, L. Mertens, A. M. van Oort, D. de Wolf, M. Freund, N. Sreeram, R. Bokenkamp, et al. Early complications of stenting in patients with congenital heart disease: a multicentre study Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2006; 27(22): 2709 - 2715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Peng, D. B. McElhinney, A. W. Nugent, A. J. Powell, A. C. Marshall, E. A. Bacha, and J. E. Lock Endovascular Stenting of Obstructed Right Ventricle-to-Pulmonary Artery Conduits: A 15-Year Experience Circulation, June 6, 2006; 113(22): 2598 - 2605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Coats, S. Khambadkone, G. Derrick, S. Sridharan, S. Schievano, B. Mist, R. Jones, J. E. Deanfield, D. Pellerin, P. Bonhoeffer, et al. Physiological and Clinical Consequences of Relief of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction Late After Repair of Congenital Heart Defects Circulation, May 2, 2006; 113(17): 2037 - 2044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Pelage, M. El Hajjam, C. Lagrange, T. Chinet, A. Vieillard-Baron, S. Chagnon, and P. Lacombe Pulmonary Artery Interventions: An Overview RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1653 - 1667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Ewert, S Schubert, B Peters, H Abdul-Khaliq, N Nagdyman, and P E Lange The CP stent--short, long, covered--for the treatment of aortic coarctation, stenosis of pulmonary arteries and caval veins, and Fontan anastomosis in children and adults: an evaluation of 60 stents in 53 patients Heart, July 1, 2005; 91(7): 948 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bokenkamp, N. A. Blom, D. De Wolf, K. Francois, J. Ottenkamp, and M. G. Hazekamp Intraoperative stenting of pulmonary arteries Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 27(4): 544 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Duke, E Rosenthal, and S A Qureshi The efficacy and safety of stent redilatation in congenital heart disease Heart, August 1, 2003; 89(8): 905 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Peuster, P Wohlsein, M Brugmann, M Ehlerding, K Seidler, C Fink, H Brauer, A Fischer, and G Hausdorf A novel approach to temporary stenting: degradable cardiovascular stents produced from corrodible metal---results 6-18 months after implantation into New Zealand white rabbits Heart, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 563 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Ungerleider, T. A. Johnston, M. P. O'Laughlin, J. J. Jaggers, and P. R. Gaskin Intraoperative stents to rehabilitate severely stenotic pulmonary vessels Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 476 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. F. Ing, T. E. Fagan, R. G. Grifka, S. Clapp, M. R. Nihill, M. Cocalis, J. Perry, J. Mathewson, and C. E. Mullins Reconstruction of stenotic or occluded iliofemoral veins and inferior vena cava using intravascular stents: re-establishing access for future cardiac catheterization and cardiac surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 251 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Baker, F. X. McGowan Jr., J. F. Keane, and J. E. Lock Pulmonary artery trauma due to balloon dilation: recognition, avoidance and management J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2000; 36(5): 1684 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Funaki, J. D. Rosenblum, J. A. Leef, G. X. Zaleski, T. Farrell, J. Lorenz, and L. Brady Percutaneous Treatment of Portal Venous Stenosis in Children and Adolescents with Segmental Hepatic Transplants: Long-term Results Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 147 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-f. Cheung, S. Sanatani, M. P. Leung, D. G. Human, A. K. T. Chau, and J. A. G. Culham Early and intermediate-term complications of self-expanding stents limit its potential application in children with congenital heart disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2000; 35(4): 1007 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Fidler, J. P. Cheatham, S. E. Fletcher, A. B. Martin, J. D. Kugler, C. H. Gumbiner, and D. A. Danford CT Angiography of Complications in Pediatric Patients Treated with Intravascular Stents Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 355 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. McElhinney, A. J. Parry, V. M. Reddy, F. L. Hanley, and P. Stanger Left Pulmonary Artery Kinking Caused by Outflow Tract Dilatation After Transannular Patch Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1998; 65(4): 1120 - 1126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Allen, R. H. Beekman III, A. Garson Jr, Z. M. Hijazi, C. Mullins, M. P. O'Laughlin, and K. A. Taubert Pediatric Therapeutic Cardiac Catheterization : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association Circulation, February 17, 1998; 97(6): 609 - 625. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kaneko, H. Okabe, N. Nagata, H. Ohuchi, J. Kobayashi, S. Kanemoto, and K. Itoh LAY-OPEN PULMONARY ARTERIOPLASTY FOR POSTOPERATIVE HILAR PULMONARY ARTERY STENOSIS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1997; 114(3): 406 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |