(Circulation. 1995;91:2132-2139.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute (Canada).
Correspondence to Pierre Théroux, MD, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger St E, Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C8, Canada.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Angiographic patency of the culprit coronary artery lesion was assessed 90 and 120 minutes after the initiation of streptokinase and aspirin and again after 4±2 days in 68 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Patients were randomized to Hirulog 0.5 mg/kg per hour for 12 hours followed by 0.1 mg/kg per hour (low dose), Hirulog 1.0 mg/kg per hour for 12 hours followed by placebo (high dose), or to heparin 5000 U bolus followed by 1000 U/h titrated to an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) 2 to 2.5 times control after 12 hours. At 90 minutes, TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 was observed in 96% of patients treated with the low dose of Hirulog, in 79% with the high dose, and in 46% with heparin (P=.006) and TIMI flow grade 3 was observed in 85%, 61%, and 31% of patients, respectively (P=.008). At 120 minutes, these figures were 100%, 82%, and 62% for TIMI flow grades 2 and 3 (P=.046) and 92%, 68%, and 46% for TIMI flow grade 3 (P=.014). At 90 minutes, the relative risk for restoring TIMI flow grade 3 was 2.77 with Hirulog 0.5 mg/kg per hour compared with heparin (95% confidence limits, 1.21 to 6.35; P<.001) and 1.4 compared with Hirulog 1.0 mg/kg per minute (95% confidence limits, 1.00 to 1.51; P=.04). Patients who received a placebo infusion after 12 hours experienced more clinical events and reocclusion during the following 4 days than patients in the other two groups.
Conclusion Hirulog yields higher early patency rates in the culprit coronary artery than heparin when used as adjunctive therapy to streptokinase and aspirin in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction. High doses are not required and may be less effective than lower doses, which suggests that too much thrombin inhibition may be harmful.
Key Words: angiography heparin streptokinase antithrombins
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The new direct thrombin inhibitors may help restore early effective flow. Experimental studies have shown that recombinant hirudin4 5 and related peptides, such as Hirulog,6 7 can facilitate thrombolysis and prevent reocclusion better than heparin when used with tissue-type plasminogen activator4 6 7 or streptokinase.5 One recent study8 in humans has suggested that recombinant hirudin combined with front-loaded tissue-type plasminogen activator could prevent reocclusion after successful reperfusion. However, major trials in which this agent was used during thrombolysis were recently interrupted by complications from excess bleeding.9 10 11 A pilot angiographic study of Hirulog with streptokinase and aspirin has suggested better early patency with this direct antithrombin infused at 0.5 mg/kg per hour for 12 hours followed by 0.1 mg/kg per hour.12 The present study was designed to reproduce this observation and to investigate whether administration of a higher dose for a shorter period of time would yield better results. Two different doses of Hirulog were compared with heparin in consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with streptokinase and aspirin in a randomized, double-blind trial, with angiographic patency as the end point.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Design
Aspirin 325 mg was first administered orally to
all patients
with suspected myocardial infarction. Eligible patients were randomized
in a double-blind manner in one of three parallel study groups to
receive Hirulog 0.5 mg/kg per hour (low dose), Hirulog 1.0 mg/kg per
hour (high dose), or heparin 1000 U/h during the first 12 hours. An
initial bolus of placebo was given to patients randomized to Hirulog,
and a bolus of 5000 U heparin was given to patients randomized to
heparin. Randomization was unbalanced to allow more patients to be
given Hirulog than heparin. In this phase 2 trial, the underlying
rationale was to maximize the statistical power of the findings in the
experimental groups while showing that the results observed with
heparin did not deviate from the previously well documented and
reproducible angiographic findings of other
studies.2 12 13 14 15 16
Two patients were randomized to each dose
of Hirulog per each patient randomized to heparin. The study drugs were
prepared in advance and left at the emergency room to accelerate
initiation of treatment. In a double-dummy technique, one bag contained
Hirulog at one of two dosage levels or placebo, and the other contained
heparin or placebo. Infusion of one or the other of the two bags was
initiated a few minutes before streptokinase 1.5 million U was
administered over 45 to 60 minutes. After 12 hours, the infusion bag of
Hirulog was changed; the initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg per hour was reduced
to 0.1 mg/kg per hour, and the dose of 1.0 mg/kg per minute was
replaced by a placebo; these doses were infused at a fixed rate
throughout the rest of the study for 4 to 6 days, until the second
angiography. Starting at 12 hours, the infusion rate of heparin was
titrated to an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) two to
three times control values. The results of the aPTT were communicated
only to the unblinded pharmacist for adjustment of the infusion rate
according to a predefined algorithm. The infusion of the
placebo-heparin bag was also titrated to maintain the blinding. The
study drugs were discontinued
30 minutes before the second
angiogram.
Cardiac Catheterization
An attempt was made to perform
coronary angiography 60 and 90
minutes after the start of the streptokinase; all patients had the
90-minute injection. A percutaneous femoral approach was used. The
suspected coronary artery was injected to determine the TIMI flow
grade.13 The injections were repeated every 10 minutes
until TIMI flow grade 3 was observed or to a maximal time of 120
minutes after the initiation of streptokinase. Coronary angioplasty was
attempted after 120 minutes if TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow was not reached.
In the interim, the opposite coronary artery was fully opacified, and a
left ventriculogram was obtained in the 30° right anterior oblique
position before the end of the procedure. The femoral sheath was
removed 6 to 12 hours later, after interruption of the study-drug
infusions for 1 to 2 hours; the infusions were restarted after
application of the compressing bandage. The median total interruption
time was 135 minutes for each of the Hirulog-treated groups and 140
minutes for the heparin-treated group (P=NS). Difficulty in
achieving local hemostasis led to a prolonged 7-hour interruption in 1
patient who received the low dose of Hirulog. Sixty-five of 68 patients
were recatheterized 4 to 6 days later. The second angiogram was
performed in all cases except in the event of death. After
recatheterization, the patency of the culprit coronary artery lesion
was verified and the left ventriculogram was repeated. Coronary
angioplasty was performed at that time if clinically indicated.
The TIMI flow grade was determined by consensus decision between an experienced radiologist and a cardiologist not involved in patient care.14 The culprit coronary artery lesions showing TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 at 90 and 120 minutes were quantified by the Coronary Artery Analysis System17 in the incidence best showing the lesion. This analysis was repeated in the same incidence on the late angiogram.
Bleeding
All bleeding was carefully evaluated and recorded.
Serious
bleeding was defined as a drop of
5 g/L in blood hemoglobin,
intracranial hemorrhage, or the administration of a blood transfusion.
These were further subdivided as either spontaneous or related to an
interventional procedure.
Laboratory Analyses
Activated partial thromboplastin times
were determined at
baseline, before the dose modifications of the study drugs at 12 hours,
and daily thereafter until the second angiogram. Thromboplastin IL-aPTT
(Coulter Electronics) was used; the values reported by our laboratory
had a ceiling value of 150 seconds. Plasma levels of Hirulog were
assessed by enzyme immunoassay 90 minutes and 12 hours after initiation
of treatment.
Statistics
The primary end points of the study were TIMI flow
grades
2 and 3 and TIMI flow grade 3, 90 and 120 minutes after the initiation
of streptokinase. Secondary end points included differences in
angiographic patency between the two dose regimens of Hirulog, death,
reinfarction, hemodynamic deterioration, recurrent ischemia, and
reocclusion at late angiography.
On the basis of the results of our
pilot study with streptokinase and
Hirulog12 and on previously published angiographic data
with streptokinase and
heparin,2 13 14 15 16
failure rates were
assumed of 30% to restore TIMI flow grade 3 with Hirulog and of 70%
with heparin. A sample size of 85 patients would allow detection of
this improvement with
=.05 and a power of 80% in a 4:1 comparison
of Hirulog with heparin, assuming an even event rate with the two doses
of Hirulog. It was recognized that this sample size would permit only
limited power to detect differences in the secondary end points between
the three study groups. Thus, 68 patients randomized to one of two
doses of Hirulog would allow a 70% power to detect an 80% risk
reduction in failing to restore effective coronary blood flow with the
high dose. The study was stopped prematurely after enrollment of 70
patients because of local administrative problems unrelated to the
trial. No interim look at the data was performed.
Two randomized patients were not included in the primary data analysis; this decision was made before unblinding the study. One patient randomized to Hirulog 0.5 mg/kg per minute did not receive the study drug because cardiogenic shock rapidly developed; this patient was immediately catheterized but died before any coronary injection could be made to assess angiographic patency. The other patient was randomized on the basis of the criteria of atypical chest pain and a left bundle branch block but had a completely normal coronary angiogram; the bundle branch block subsequently was documented to be rate dependent. The study drug was rapidly discontinued in this patient. An intention-to-treat analysis including these 2 patients, provided in "Results," does not modify the primary analysis.
All clinical and angiographic data were analyzed locally by
the study
investigators and classified before unblinding the study. Baseline
characteristics of the study groups were compared by
2 analysis for discrete variables and by
ANOVA for continuous variables. The end-point events in the three study
groups were first compared by logistic ANOVA by use of the CATMOD
procedure in the SAS/STAT software; when
P<.05, the intergroup differences were tested by contrast
analysis with P<.05/3 considered significant.
Significant levels for other data were set at P=.05. The
relative risks of a patent coronary artery and 95% confidence limits
were calculated by the Taylor series. aPTT results were analyzed by the
Mann-Whitney rank sum test and are presented as median and 25th and
75th percentiles. Other data are mean±SD.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Angiographic Results
The culprit coronary artery could be
injected at 60 minutes in 37
patients and at 90 minutes in all 68 patients. Fig 1
illustrates the TIMI flow grades 2 and 3 and the TIMI flow grade 3
observed at 60, 90, and 120 minutes in the various study groups. For
the purpose of this analysis, TIMI flow grade 3 observed at an
early time was considered to persist until 120 minutes. None of the
patients had a clinical evolution that suggested that this was not the
case. Coronary angioplasty was attempted in the 10 patients with
persisting TIMI flow grade 0 or 1 at 120 minutes and successfully
restored TIMI flow grade 3 in 7 patients; the immediate mean residual
percent luminal diameter reduction in these patients was
39.6±13%.
|
Early Angiographic Results
The logistic ANOVA of early
angiographic patency rates showed
statistically significant differences between the three study groups.
The gain with Hirulog 0.5 mg/kg per hour versus heparin accounted for
this difference (Fig 1
). With this low dose of Hirulog, TIMI
flow grade
2 or 3 was achieved in 87%, 96%, and 100% of patients at 60, 90, and
120 minutes, respectively, after the onset of streptokinase, and TIMI
flow grade 3 was achieved in 69%, 85%, and 92% respectively, during
these times. For heparin, TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 was achieved in 43%,
46%, and 62% and TIMI flow grade 3 was achieved in 29%, 31%, and
46% of patients at 60, 90, and 120 minutes, respectively. An
analysis by intention-to-treat, which assumed that the excluded
patient randomized to Hirulog 0.5 mg/kg per hour failed reperfusion and
that the patient randomized to heparin succeeded did not affect the
significance of the results for TIMI flow grade 3 at 90 minutes in 23
of 28 patients randomized to Hirulog 0.5 mg/kg per hour (82%) and in 5
of 14 patients randomized to heparin (36%, P=.004).
Patients given the higher dose of Hirulog (1.0 mg/kg per hour) had
patent arteries more frequently than those given heparin but less
frequently than those given the low dose of Hirulog (0.5 mg/kg per
hour). TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 was present in 79%
(P=.044 versus heparin and P=.079 versus
Hirulog
0.5 mg/kg per hour) and 82% of patients given Hirulog 1.0 mg/kg per
hour at 90 and 120 minutes, respectively. TIMI flow grade 3 was
present in 61% of patients given Hirulog 1.0 mg/kg per hour at 90
minutes (P=.081 versus heparin and P=.048
versus
Hirulog 0.05 mg/kg per hour) and in 68% of patients given this dose of
Hirulog at 120 minutes (Fig 1
).
The relative risks (RRs) for achieving TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 with Hirulog at either dose compared with heparin were RR=1.87 (95% CI, 0.78 to 4.47, P=.07) at 60 minutes, RR=1.89 (95% CI, 1.04 to 3.43; P=.02) at 90 minutes, and RR=1.59 (95% CI, 1.00 to 2.52; P=.006) at 120 minutes. For TIMI flow grade 3, RR=2.22 (95% CI, 0.67 to 7.38; P=.1), RR=2.36 (95% CI, 1.03 to 5.43; P=.006), and RR=1.73 (95% CI, 0.95 to 3.16; P=.02) for 60, 90, and 120 minutes, respectively. The RRs for restoring TIMI grade 3 flow with the lower dose versus the higher dose of Hirulog were 1.40 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.97; P=.04) and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.8; P=.02) at 90 and 120 minutes, respectively.
Angiographic reperfusion was achieved in 22 of 23 patients (96%) who received Hirulog 0.5 mg/kg per hour within 4 hours after onset of pain and in all 4 patients (100%) who received this dose regimen more than 4 hours after the onset of pain; reperfusion was achieved in 20 of 26 patients (77%) with Hirulog 1.0 mg/kg per hour within 4 hours and in 2 of 2 patients treated after 4 hours (100%). Reperfusion was achieved in 4 of 10 patients given heparin within 4 hours after the onset of pain (40%) and 2 of 3 (66%) given heparin more than 4 hours after the onset of pain. The site of the infarction did not influence the results of this study with TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 at 90 minutes in 16 of 17 patients (94%) with an inferior myocardial infarction treated with Hirulog 0.5 mg/kg per hour, in 16 of 20 (80%) treated with Hirulog 1.0 mg/kg per hour, and in 4 of 9 (44%) treated with heparin.
Late Angiographic Results and Quantitative Coronary
Angiography
Coronary angiography repeated after 4 to 6 days in all but
3
patients showed TIMI flow grade 3 in 25 of 26 patients (96%) in the
group that received the low dose of Hirulog, in 22 of 27 (81%) that
received the high dose of Hirulog, and in 10 of 12 (83%) in the
heparin-treated group. Angiographic reocclusion occurred in 5 patients;
4 had received the placebo infusion after the 12-hour infusion of
Hirulog and 1 had received the 0.1 mg/kg per hour infusion of
Hirulog.
Quantitative coronary angiography of the culprit coronary artery lesions, with TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 obtained spontaneously during the infusion and with no coronary angioplasty, showed similar minimal diameters in the three study groups at 90 minutes, 120 minutes, and 5 days. At 90 minutes, minimal diameter was 0.99±0.32 mm in patients who received the low dose of Hirulog, 1.11±1.15 mm in those who received the high dose of Hirulog, and 0.95±0.59 mm in those who received heparin. At 120 minutes, these minimal diameter measurements were 1.02±0.29, 1.15±0.38, and 1.06±0.50 mm, respectively. Significant improvement at 5 days was observed only in the heparin-treated group (from 1.06±0.50 mm at 120 minutes to 1.3±0.52 mm, P<.05). Measurements were not significantly different in the groups that received the low (1.09±0.40 mm) and the high doses of Hirulog (1.35±0.75 mm).
Fig 2
illustrates the serial
changes in minimal diameter
for each patient and also includes the 7 patients with successful
angioplasty at 120 minutes. Whereas minimal diameter increased at 5
days in patients with drug-induced reperfusion, it decreased from
2.42±0.85 to 1.54±1.16 mm (P<.02) in patients with
mechanical reperfusion, corresponding to luminal diameter reductions of
39.6±14% and 62.5±21.5%, respectively (P<.02).
|
Clinical Results
Clinical outcomes are summarized in Table
2
.
Ischemia during the temporary discontinuation of the study drug to
remove the femoral sheath was observed in only 1 patient, in whom the
chest pain was accompanied by transient ST-segment elevation. This
patient was receiving Hirulog 0.5 mg/kg per hour. Overall, recurrent
ischemia and recurrent myocardial infarction occurred less frequently
in patients treated with the low dose of Hirulog (7%) than in those
treated with the high dose modified to placebo after 12 hours (18%) or
with heparin (23%). One patient in the group treated with the low dose
of Hirulog died because of cardiac rupture, and 1 in each of the two
other groups died of cardiogenic shock. Baseline ejection fraction was
similar in all three study groups and patients in the group treated
with the low dose of Hirulog showed greater improvement at the second
angiogram. Serious bleeding complications were observed in 22% of
patients treated with the low dose of Hirulog, 18% of those treated
with the high dose of Hirulog, and 31% of those treated with heparin.
Two thirds of the serious bleeding cases were related to the catheter
at the femoral arterial puncture site in the group treated with
Hirulog, and one third were spontaneous and unrelated to an
intervention; in the group treated with heparin, half were spontaneous
and half catheter-related. Blood transfusion was administered in 5% of
the Hirulog-treated patients and 31% of the heparin-treated patients
(P<.02). No intracranial bleeding or stroke occurred in the
study.
|
Table 3
shows the median aPTT values observed at
various
times during the study; these were significantly more prolonged at 12
hours in patients treated with the high dose of Hirulog compared with
those treated with the low dose of Hirulog or with heparin. The aPTT
measurements reached the ceiling value of 150 seconds in 75% of the
patients treated with the high dose of Hirulog, compared with 21% of
those treated with the low dose of Hirulog and 50% of those treated
with heparin. The values subsequently decreased to normal once patients
were treated with placebo and to similar values between 40 and 50
seconds with Hirulog 0.5 mg/kg per hour and with heparin. Plasma levels
of Hirulog in patients treated with the lower dose of Hirulog were
1526±108 ng/mL at 90 minutes and 2064±36 ng/mL at 12 hours.
Significantly higher values were observed in patients treated with the
high dose of Hirulog: 2628±1370 and 3924±2456 ng/mL at 90
minutes and
12 hours, respectively (P<.002).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hirudin and Hirulog should theoretically lead to similar benefits, since the two drugs share similar mechanisms of action.20 Both agents interact with the anion-binding exosite and the catalytic site of thrombin and form stoichiometric complexes with the enzyme. Unlike heparin, the direct thrombin inhibitors are not neutralized by components of the platelet-release reaction, such as platelet factor 4.21 In addition, the direct thrombin inhibitors inactivate fluid-phase and clot-bound thrombin equally well, whereas heparin is limited in its ability to inhibit clot-bound thrombin.22
In experimental models of thrombosis, both Hirulog and hirudin accelerate thrombolysis and prevent reocclusion.6 Hirudin is a potent and specific inhibitor isolated from the saliva of the medicinal leech.21 In contrast, Hirulog is a synthetic bivalent peptide that contains the [D]Phe-Pro-Arg-Pro catalytic site inhibitor and the carboxy-terminal portion of hirudin residues 53 to 64 that interacts with the anion-binding exosite of thrombin, with a polyglycyl link.20 Thus, unlike hirudin, Hirulog is cleaved by thrombin so that active site inhibition is lost. Hirulog has a half-life of 36 minutes, whereas the half-life of hirudin is 2 to 3 hours; elimination of Hirulog is primarily by protease digestion, with only 20% eliminated by the kidneys; hirudin is excreted entirely through the kidneys. As a result, Hirulog may have a different risk-to-benefit ratio than hirudin when used with a thrombolytic agent.
High Dose Versus Low Dose of Hirulog
Experimental studies in
pigs have shown less platelet and
fibrinogen deposition at sites of deep arterial injury with higher
doses of recombinant hirudin, prolonging the aPTT to two to four times
control compared with lower doses, with which aPTT was prolonged to 1.7
times control. In these studies, prolonged aPTT correlated inversely
with quantitative platelet and fibrinogen deposition, suggesting a
dose-antithrombotic response.23 Accordingly, this study
included a group treated with a higher dose of Hirulog, which prolonged
the aPTT to more than four times control. An unexpected finding,
however, was that the lower dose was more effective resulting in TIMI
flow grade 2 or 3 in 18% and 14% more patients, respectively, than
with the high dose of Hirulog. The difference could be a chance effect
because of the small number of patients studied; this lower dose,
however, improved flow in a statistically significant manner compared
with heparin, which suggests that, at a minimum, higher doses are not
definitively better than lower doses. This finding implies that too
much thrombin inhibition could be harmful compared with moderate
inhibition. This point has not been emphasized previously, although
many dose-ranging studies have failed to show better benefits with
higher doses of recombinant hirudin compared with lower
doses.8 9 24 25 Thus, in the
TIMI 5 study, early TIMI flow
grade 3 was 67% with lower doses and 55% with a higher
dose.8 Further, in the TIMI 6 study, the reduction in
mortality and in serious cardiac events was not better with the low
dose of hirudin compared with higher doses.24 Finally, a
multicenter angiographic trial of unstable angina suggested less
improvement in the cross-sectional area of the culprit lesion and less
TIMI flow grade improvement with the highest dose compared with lower
doses.25 As in our study, these pilot studies contain
small numbers of patients, and differences in baseline characteristics
could have influenced the results. These differences may not be
measurable and, even when not statistically different, they may add
together to create a group difference in patient characteristics. In
our study, there were slightly more smokers in the group given the high
dose of Hirulog, which could have favored more successful
thrombolysis.26 In this group, time from onset of pain to
onset of streptokinase was slightly longer and 3 more patients had an
inferior myocardial infarction, two factors with a possible small
negative effect on the success of treatment.14 Subanalyses
of patients by time to treatment, <4 or
4 hours after onset of pain,
and site of myocardial infarction, however, have shown no influence of
these factors on the results.
The explanation for a potential deleterious effect of excess thrombin inhibition is unclear. One possibility is that at high doses, the direct thrombin inhibitors block the protein C anticoagulant pathway. Thus, by interacting with thrombin, these agents can prevent the formation of the thrombin-thrombomodulin complex that activates protein C.21 Since activated protein C is a potent anticoagulant because it proteolytically degrades activated factors V and VIII, key factors in the coagulation pathways,27 a decrease in the levels of activated protein C will compromise the hemostatic balance.28 Further studies are needed to test this new hypothesis.
Results of the present study also showed that prolonged aPTT does not indicate better success. In this study, the aPTT values observed with Hirulog 0.5 mg/kg per hour were not higher at any time than values observed with heparin. Higher aPTTs may not be required and may increase the risk of bleeding.10
Clinical Results
An excess of clinical events and of
angiographic reocclusion
occurred after the very acute phase in the group of patients treated by
infusion with Hirulog followed by placebo. Recurrent ischemia
supervened in 3 patients, recurrent infarction in 2, and reocclusion in
4; these events were less frequent in the group that maintained the
infusion of 0.1 mg/kg per hour of Hirulog. This supports the findings
of TIMI 5 of a beneficial effect of the antithrombotic agent in the
days after thrombolysis.8 The differences between groups
were not significant, but the small number of events precludes firm
conclusions. The same limitation applies to other secondary end points
of the study and to the bleeding complications. It is, however,
encouraging to see that bleeding complications were not more frequent
with Hirulog. This remains to be carefully tested in a larger study,
considering the recently reported excess bleeding risk with recombinant
hirudin.9 10 11
The results of the present study, which show improved thrombolysis with a conservative dose of Hirulog, should be confirmed by a larger trial and by documentation of associated clinical benefits. If confirmed, however, this new adjunctive therapy could be effective for promoting the thrombolytic efficacy of streptokinase beyond that of the best thrombolytic regimen now available.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 26, 1994; accepted November 11, 1994.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Singh, J. Molnar, and R. Arora Efficacy and Safety of Bivalirudin Versus Heparins in Reduction of Cardiac Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, December 1, 2007; 12(4): 283 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Menon, R. A. Harrington, J. S. Hochman, C. P. Cannon, S. D. Goodman, R. G. Wilcox, H. J. Schunemann, and E. M. Ohman Thrombolysis and Adjunctive Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 549S - 575S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Eichler, N. Lubenow, U. Strobel, and A. Greinacher Antibodies against lepirudin are polyspecific and recognize epitopes on bivalirudin Blood, January 15, 2004; 103(2): 613 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Eikelboom, H. White, and S. Yusuf The evolving role of direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2003; 41(4_Suppl_S): 70S - 78S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Lauer, P. L. Houghtaling, J. G. Peterson, C. B. Granger, D. L. Bhatt, S. K. Sapp, M. L. Simoons, R. A. Harrington, E. J. Topol, and A. M. Lincoff Attenuation of Rebound Ischemia After Discontinuation of Heparin Therapy by Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition With Eptifibatide in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Observations From the Platelet IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) Trial Circulation, December 4, 2001; 104(23): 2772 - 2777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Abendschein, P. K. Baum, P. Verhallen, P. R. Eisenberg, M. E. Sullivan, and D. R. Light A Novel Synthetic Inhibitor of Factor Xa Decreases Early Reocclusion and Improves 24-h Patency after Coronary Fibrinolysis in Dogs J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 13, 2001; 296(2): 567 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. N. Levine, M. N. Ali, and A. I. Schafer Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Arch Intern Med, April 9, 2001; 161(7): 937 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Ohman, R. A. Harrington, C. P. Cannon, G. Agnelli, J. A. Cairns, and J.W. Kennedy Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction Chest, January 1, 2001; 119(1_suppl): 253S - 277S. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. F. Kong, E. J. Topol, J. A. Bittl, H. D. White, P. Theroux, V. Hasselblad, and R. M. Califf Clinical Outcomes of Bivalirudin for Ischemic Heart Disease Circulation, November 16, 1999; 100(20): 2049 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I.-K. Jang, D. F. M. Brown, R. P. Giugliano, H. V. Anderson, D. Losordo, J. C. Nicolau, O. P. Dutra, O. Bazzino, V. M. Viamonte, R. Norbady, et al. A multicenter, randomized study of argatroban versus heparin as adjunct to tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) in acute myocardial infarction: myocardial infarction with Novastan and TPA (MINT) study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 1879 - 1885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Linder, J. Oldgren, N. Egberg, L. Grip, G. Larson, A. Siegbahn, and L. Wallentin The effect of a low molecular mass thrombin inhibitor, inogatran, and heparin on thrombin generation and fibrin turnover in patients with unstable coronary artery disease Eur. Heart J., April 1, 1999; 20(7): 506 - 518. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Frostfeldt, G. Ahlberg, G. Gustafsson, G. Helmius, B. Lindahl, A. Nygren, A. Siegbahn, E. Swahn, P. Venge, and L. Wallentin Low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) as adjuvant treatment to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction--a pilot study: Biochemical Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes (BIOMACS II) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 1999; 33(3): 627 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. I. Weitz, B. Leslie, and M. Hudoba Thrombin Binds to Soluble Fibrin Degradation Products Where it Is Protected From Inhibition by Heparin-Antithrombin but Susceptible to Inactivation by Antithrombin-Independent Inhibitors Circulation, February 17, 1998; 97(6): 544 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. White, P. E. Aylward, M. J. Frey, A. A. J. Adgey, R. Nair, W. S. Hillis, Y. Shalev, M. A. Brown, J. K. French, R. Collins, et al. Randomized, Double-blind Comparison of Hirulog Versus Heparin in Patients Receiving Streptokinase and Aspirin for Acute Myocardial Infarction (HERO) Circulation, October 7, 1997; 96(7): 2155 - 2161. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. V. Jackson, J. Satterwhite, and E. Roberts Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacology of Efegatran (LY294468) : A Novel Antithrombin for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, October 1, 1996; 2(4): 258 - 267. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Forrester New Standard for Success of Thrombolytic Therapy : An Earnest Proposal Circulation, October 15, 1995; 92(8): 2026 - 2028. [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||