Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
« Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article »
Circulation. 1995;91:1959-1965

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mintz, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Leon, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mintz, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Leon, M. B.

(Circulation. 1995;91:1959-1965.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Patterns of Calcification in Coronary Artery Disease

A Statistical Analysis of Intravascular Ultrasound and Coronary Angiography in 1155 Lesions

Gary S. Mintz, MD; Jeffrey J. Popma, MD; Augusto D. Pichard, MD; Kenneth M. Kent, MD, PhD; Lowell F. Satler, MD; Ya Chien Chuang, PhD; Christine J. Ditrano, BS; Martin B. Leon, MD

From the Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories of the Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.

Correspondence to Martin B. Leon, MD, Director of Research, Washington Cardiology Center, 110 Irving St NW (4B-1), Washington, DC 20010.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
 *Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
 down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Target lesion calcium is a marker for significant coronary artery disease and a determinant of the success of transcatheter therapy.

Methods and Results Eleven hundred fifty-five native vessel target lesions in 1117 patients were studied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and coronary angiography. The presence, magnitude, location, and distribution of IVUS calcium were analyzed and compared with the detection and classification (none/mild, moderate, and severe) by angiography. Angiography detected calcium in 440 of 1155 lesions (38%): 306 (26%) moderate calcium and 134 (12%) severe. IVUS detected lesion calcium in 841 of 1155 (73%, P<.0001 versus angiography). The mean arc of lesion calcium measured 115±110°; the mean length measured 3.5±3.7 mm. Target lesion calcium was only superficial in 48%, only deep in 28%, and both superficial and deep in 24%. The mean arc of superficial calcium measured 85±108°; the mean length measured 2.4±3.4 mm. Three hundred seventy-three of 1155 reference segments (32%) contained calcium (P<.0001 compared with lesion site). The mean arc of reference calcium measured 42±80°; the mean length measured 1.7±3.6 mm. Only 44 (4%) had reference calcium in the absence of lesion calcium. Angiographic detection and classification of calcium depended on arcs, lengths, location, and distribution of lesion and reference segment calcium. By discriminant analysis, the classification function for predicting angiographic calcium included the arc of target lesion calcium, the arc of superficial calcium, the length of reference segment calcium, and the location of calcium within the lesion. This model correctly predicted the angiographic detection of calcification in 74.4% of lesions and the angiographic classification (none/moderate/severe) of calcium in 62.8% of lesions.

Conclusions IVUS detected calcium in >70% of lesions, significantly more often than standard angiography. Although angiography is moderately sensitive for the detection of extensive lesion calcium (sensitivity, 60% and 85% for three- and four-quadrant calcium, respectively), it is less sensitive for the presence of milder degrees.


Key Words: coronary disease • calcium • ultrasonics • angiography


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
 up arrowAbstract
 *Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Selective coronary arteriography has been the "gold standard" for guiding revascularization in coronary artery disease. Despite its widespread acceptance, it has many inherent limitations, including its inability to assess plaque composition with negative contrast imaging. Recently, it has been suggested that coronary arteriography has a limited ability to detect and localize target lesion calcium.1 2 Target lesion calcium is both a marker for significant coronary artery disease and the major determinant of the success of various transcatheter therapies.2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides transmural images of coronary arteries in vivo. The normal coronary arterial wall, the major components of the atherosclerotic plaque, and the changes that occur during the atherosclerotic disease process, after transcatheter therapy, and during restenosis can be studied in humans in a manner previously not possible. The purpose of this study is (1) to use IVUS to evaluate the patterns (eg, magnitude, location, and distribution) of coronary artery calcium in a large number of patients undergoing transcatheter therapy for coronary artery disease and (2) to compare IVUS and coronary angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery calcification.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
 up arrowAbstract
 up arrowIntroduction
 *Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Population
From July 1, 1991, to March 1, 1994, 1155 target lesions in 1117 patients were studied by IVUS and coronary angiography. These lesions met the following criteria: (1) native vessel location (thereby excluding vein graft and internal mammary lesions) and (2) ability to assess target lesion morphology by both IVUS and coronary angiography (therefore excluding lesions with previous stent placement). There were 862 men and 255 women 61±11 years old. Target lesion location was left main in 47, left anterior descending in 487, left circumflex in 180, and right coronary artery in 441; diagonal branches were considered part of the left anterior descending, and marginal branches were considered part of the left circumflex artery. One hundred ninety-six lesions were ostial in location. No catheter-based intervention was performed in 149 lesions (21 of which were treated instead with operative revascularization); balloon angioplasty was performed in 127 lesions, directional coronary atherectomy (Devices for Vascular Intervention) in 400 lesions, rotational atherectomy (Heart Technology) in 299 lesions, extraction atherectomy (InterVentional Technologies) in 5 lesions, stent placement (Palmaz and Palmaz-Schatz tubular slotted stents, Johnson and Johnson Interventional Systems; Gianturco-Roubin Flex-Stent, Cook, Inc; and Wiktor coiled stents, Medtronic, Inc) in 33 lesions, and excimer laser angioplasty (Advanced Interventional Systems) in 142 lesions.

IVUS Analysis
Preintervention IVUS imaging was performed in 872 lesions (75%). IVUS studies used one of three commercially available systems. The first (Cardiovascular Imaging Systems Inc/InterTherapy Inc) incorporated a single-element 25-MHz transducer and an angled mirror mounted on the tip of a flexible shaft that was rotated at 1800 rpm within a 3.9F short monorail polyethylene imaging sheath to form planar cross-sectional images in real time; with this system, the transducer was withdrawn automatically at 0.5 mm/s to perform the imaging sequence. The second (Hewlett Packard and Boston Scientific Corp) incorporated a single-element 30-MHz beveled transducer rotated at 1800 rpm within a 3.5F short monorail imaging catheter; with this system, the catheter was advanced or withdrawn manually with fluoroscopic guidance to perform the imaging sequence. The third (Cardiovascular Imaging Systems Inc) incorporated a single-element 30-MHz beveled transducer within either a 2.9F long monorail imaging catheter having a common distal lumen design (the distal lumen alternatively accommodates the imaging core or the guide wire, but not both) or a 3.2F short monorail imaging catheter; with this system, the transducer was withdrawn automatically at 0.5 mm/s to perform the imaging sequence. IVUS studies were recorded on 1/2-in high-resolution s-VHS taped for off-line analysis.

All patients were studied after having given informed consent. All IVUS imaging protocols have the ongoing approval of the Washington Hospital Center Institutional Review Board.

Quantitative analysis of the ultrasound images was performed by a single individual blinded to the angiographic results. A number of cross-sectional measurements were made, including lesion site external elastic membrane or media/adventitia interface, lumen, and plaque-plus-media cross-sectional areas and maximum and minimum plaque-plus-media thicknesses.14 15 16 17 18 19 20 When the atherosclerotic plaque encompassed the catheter, the lumen was assumed to be the size of the imaging catheter. Because media thickness could not be measured accurately, plaque-plus-media cross-sectional area and thickness were used as measurements of the atherosclerotic plaque.21 Plaque-plus-media cross-sectional area was calculated as external elastic membrane minus lumen cross-sectional area. Although acoustic shadowing caused by lesion calcification made identification of the external elastic membrane (and therefore measurement of maximum and minimum plaque-plus-media thicknesses) difficult, two types of extrapolation were useful. Briefly, because the cross-sectional geometry of the coronary artery was more or less circular, extrapolation of the circumference of the external elastic membrane was possible provided that each calcific deposit did not shadow more than 60° of the adventitial circumference. Also, real-time axial movement of the transducer just distal and proximal to a calcific deposit (or to find the smallest circumferential arc of calcium within a large calcific deposit) helped unmask and fill in contiguous parts of the adventitia that were otherwise shadowed by that deposit.22 23

Plaque composition was assessed visually to identify lesion calcium.16 17 18 19 24 Calcium produced bright echoes (brighter than the reference adventitia) with acoustic shadowing of deeper arterial structures. The extent and distribution of target lesion calcification was assessed as follows (Fig 1Down).1



View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Six examples of intravascular ultrasound target lesion calcium are shown. A, Arc of target lesion calcium of 80°. B, Circumferential (360°) arc of calcium (white arrow). C, Arc of superficial calcium (white arrow). D, Arc of deep calcium (large white arrow) adjacent to the media/adventitia border (two small arrows). E, Arc of calcium (large white arrow) concordant to the maximum plaque thickness (double-headed white arrow). Dotted line indicates the extrapolated media/adventitia border. F, Arc of calcium (large white arrow) perpendicular to the maximum plaque thickness (double-headed white arrow).

1. The largest arc(s) of target lesion calcium and superficial lesion calcification were measured in degrees with a protractor centered on the lumen (Fig 1AUp and 1BUp). The intraobserver variability of this arc of calcium measurement is ±5°. Calcification was then classified as none, one-quadrant (<=90°), two-quadrant (91° to 180°), three-quadrant (181° to 270°), or four-quadrant (271° to 360°) calcification. If there was more than one calcific deposit in a given imaging slice, then the arcs of calcium were added.

2. The location of target lesion calcium (Fig 1CUp and 1DUp) was defined as superficial (calcium at the intimal-lumen interface or closer to the lumen than to the adventitia), deep (calcium at the media/adventitia border or closer to the adventitia than to the lumen), or both (superficial and deep).

3. The location of a superficial or deep calcific deposit within a plaque was assessed relative to the point of thickest plaque accumulation (maximum plaque-plus-media thickness). Then the orientation of the superficial or deep target calcific deposit relative to the point of thickest plaque accumulation was classified as concordant (center of the arc of calcium within 45° of the thickest plaque accumulation), perpendicular (center of the arc of calcium 45° to 135° relative to the thickest plaque accumulation), or opposite (center of arc of calcium >=135° away from the thickest plaque accumulation, Fig 1EUp and 1FUp).

4. In the 1021 lesions studied with a motorized pullback device, the overall lengths (in millimeters) of contiguous and overlapping target lesion and superficial lesion calcium were measured from the number of seconds of videotape in which calcium was identified (millimeters equal to seconds of videotape x0.5 mm/s).

Reference segment calcification was assessed over a 10-mm length of artery proximal to the target lesion but distal to a major side branch.25 In circumstances in which a proximal reference segment could not be identified (eg, ostial lesion location), distal reference segment calcification (also over a 10-mm length of artery distal to the target lesion but proximal to a major side branch) was analyzed. The largest arc of calcification, the length of calcium, and calcium location within the 10-mm-long reference segment were then assessed as above.

Last, a total length (in millimeters) of calcium was calculated as length of lesion calcium plus length of reference segment calcium.

Angiographic Analysis
Preprocedural angiograms were reviewed by a core angiographic laboratory that was blinded to the ultrasound results. Standard qualitative morphological criteria were recorded on the basis of their identification in any unforeshortened view.26 Calcification was identified as readily apparent radiopacities within the vascular wall at the site of the stenosis and was classified as none/mild, moderate (radiopacities noted only during the cardiac cycle before contrast injection), and severe (radiopacities noted without cardiac motion before contrast injection generally compromising both sides of the arterial lumen).

Target lesion location was designated as ostial, proximal, mid, and distal. Ostial lesions were those lesions that began within 3 mm of a major coronary ostium.

Quantitative angiographic analysis used a computer-assisted, automated edge-detection algorithm (ImageComm). With the external diameter of the contrast-filled catheters as the calibration standard, the minimal lumen diameter at end diastole before intervention was measured from orthogonal projections, and the results from the "worst" view were recorded.27

Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed with STATVIEW 4.01 and BMDP.28 Quantitative data are presented as mean±SD. Qualitative data are presented as frequencies. Categorical variables were assessed by {chi}2 statistics. Continuous variables were compared by unpaired Student's t tests and ANOVA as appropriate. A discriminant analysis was used to find the combination of variables that best predicted the presence of angiographic calcium (yes/no) and the classification of angiographic calcium (none/moderate/severe). The number of cases correctly classified into each group was then summarized.


*    Results
up arrowTop
 up arrowAbstract
 up arrowIntroduction
 up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
IVUS Target Lesion Calcium
By IVUS, 841 of 1155 target lesions (73%) contained calcium. The mean arc of target lesion calcium measured 115±110°, and the mean length of target lesion calcium measured 3.5±3.7 mm. The frequency distribution of the arcs and lengths of target lesion calcium is shown in Fig 2Down.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Bar graphs. Left, Frequency distribution of the maximum arc of intravascular ultrasound target lesion calcium. Coronary angiography detected 25% of one-quadrant calcium, 50% of two-quadrant calcium, 60% of three-quadrant calcium, and 85% of four-quadrant calcium. Right, Frequency distribution of the lengths of intravascular ultrasound target lesion calcium. Coronary angiography detected 42% of calcium <=5 mm in length, 63% of calcium 6 to 10 mm in length, and 61% of calcium >11 mm in length. Thus, the sensitivity of angiography increased with an increasing arc or length of lesion-associated calcium (both P<.0001).

When present, target lesion calcium was only superficial in 48%, only deep in 28%, and both superficial and deep in 24% (Fig 3Down). The mean arc of superficial calcium measured 85±108°, and the mean length of superficial calcium measured 2.4±3.4 mm. The frequency distribution of the arcs and lengths of superficial calcium is shown in Fig 4Down. When present, superficial calcium was concordant to the maximum plaque-plus-media thickness in 71%, perpendicular in 23%, and opposite in 6% (Fig 5ADown). When present, deep calcium was concordant to the maximum plaque-plus-media thickness in 71%, perpendicular in 24%, and opposite in 5% (Fig 5BDown).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Bar graph. Target lesion calcium most often is superficial. Coronary angiography detected superficial target lesion calcium, either alone (sensitivity, 60%) or in combination with deep calcium (sensitivity, 54%), more often than it detected isolated deep target lesion calcium (sensitivity, 24%, P<.0001).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. Bar graphs. Left, Frequency distribution of the arc of superficial target lesion calcium. Coronary angiography detected 34% of one-quadrant superficial calcium, 59% of two-quadrant superficial calcium, 69% of three-quadrant superficial calcium, and 86% of four-quadrant superficial calcium. Right, Frequency distribution of the lengths of superficial target lesion calcium. Coronary angiography detected 50% of superficial calcium <=5 mm in length, 67% of superficial calcium 6 to 10 mm in length, and 65% of superficial calcium >11 mm in length. Thus, the sensitivity of coronary angiography increased with an increasing arc or length of lesion-associated superficial calcium (both P<.0001).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 5. Bar graphs. Target lesion calcium, whether superficial or deep, most often is concordant (within 45°) to the maximum plaque thickness. Left, Coronary angiography detects concordant superficial target lesion calcium (sensitivity, 64%) more often than it detects superficial calcium that is perpendicular to or opposite the maximum atherosclerotic plaque thickness (sensitivity, 39% and 33%, respectively, P=.0011). Right, Conversely, angiographic detection of deep target lesion calcium is not related to its relation to plaque distribution (P=NS).

By IVUS, 373 of 1155 reference segments (32%) contained calcium (P<.0001 compared with target lesion calcium). The frequency distribution of the arcs and lengths of reference segment calcium is shown in Fig 6Down. When present, reference segment calcium was only superficial in 78%, only deep in 13%, and both superficial and deep in 9%. The mean arc of reference segment calcium measured 42±80°, and the mean length of reference segment calcium measured 1.7±3.6 mm (both P<.0001 compared with target lesion calcium). Only 44 vessels (4%) had reference segment calcium in the absence of target lesion calcium.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 6. Bar graphs. Left, Frequency distribution of the arc of reference segment calcium. Coronary angiography detected calcium in 53% of lesions whose reference segments contained one-quadrant calcium, 61% of lesions whose reference segments contained two-quadrant calcium, 73% of lesions whose reference segments contained three-quadrant calcium, and 61% of lesions whose reference segments contained four-quadrant calcium. Right, Frequency distribution of the lengths of reference segment calcium. Coronary angiography detected calcium in 52% of lesions whose reference segments contained a <=5-mm length of calcium, 72% of lesions whose reference segments contained a 6- to 10-mm length of calcium, and 60% of lesions whose reference segments contained a >11-mm length of calcium. Thus, the sensitivity of coronary angiography increased with an increasing arc or length of lesion-associated reference segment calcium (both P<.0001).

The total (lesion-plus-reference segment) mean length of calcium was 5.2±5.7 mm.

Angiographic Results
The mean reference segment diameter measured 3.09±0.60 mm, the mean preintervention minimum lumen diameter measured 1.14±0.67 mm, and the mean percent diameter stenosis measured 63.3±20.0%.

Coronary angiography detected target lesion calcium in 440 of 1155 lesions (38%, P<.0001 compared with IVUS); 306 lesions (26%) had moderate calcium, and 134 lesions (12%) had severe calcium. The presence and classification of angiographic calcium correlated with an increasing arc and length of IVUS target lesion calcium, IVUS superficial calcium, and IVUS reference segment calcium (Figs 2Up, 4Up, and 6Up and the TableDown). In addition, coronary angiography detected superficial calcium more often than deep calcium (Fig 3Up, P<.0001). Furthermore, coronary angiography detected superficial calcium that was concordant to the maximum plaque-plus-media thickness more often than it detected superficial calcium that was opposite the maximum plaque-plus-media thickness (P=.0011, Fig 5AUp). No similar relation was noted with deep target lesion calcium (Fig 5BUp).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Relation of Presence and Severity of Angiographic Calcification to Patterns of Intravascular Ultrasound Target Lesion and Reference Segment Calcium

The overall sensitivity of angiography in detecting the presence of target lesion calcium was 48%; it was lowest in those lesions with one-quadrant calcium and highest (85%) in lesions with four-quadrant calcium. The overall specificity of the angiographic detection of target lesion calcium was 89%, and it was 98% for the angiographic classification of "severe" lesion calcium (TableUp; Fig 2Up). Coronary angiography had a false-positive rate of 11% in indicating the presence of target lesion calcium, a rate that was not explained by the presence of isolated reference segment calcification.

IVUS Determinants of Angiographic Calcification
By univariate analysis, the angiographic detection and classification of target lesion calcium depended on the arcs, lengths, location, and distribution of target and reference segment calcium (TableUp; Figs 2 through 6UpUpUpUpUp). By discriminant analysis (variables are listed in the TableUp), a predictive model of angiographic calcium classification (none/moderate/severe) was constructed; this model included the arc of target lesion calcium, the arc of superficial calcium, the length of reference segment calcium, and the location of calcium within the lesion. It correctly predicted the angiographic classification in 62.8% of lesions. A second predictive model of calcium detection (yes/no) was then constructed; this model included the arc of target lesion calcium, the arc of superficial calcium, and the length of reference segment calcium and correctly predicted the angiographic detection of calcium in 74.4% of lesions.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
 up arrowAbstract
 up arrowIntroduction
 up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Pathological studies have shown that lesion-associated coronary artery calcium increases with the extent and severity of atherosclerosis, increasing patient age, and the presence of primary or secondary chronic hypercalcemia, hyperlipidemia, or chronic renal insufficiency.3 4 5 29 30 31 32 33 34 The highest pathological incidence reported is 79%.5 Because coronary artery calcium is a marker for significant coronary atherosclerosis, procedures are being developed to detect coronary artery calcium noninvasively as a screening test for significant coronary artery disease.6 9 35 36 37 38 39 40

Importance of IVUS Target Lesion Calcium
The IVUS identification of tissue calcium has been validated in vitro.16 17 18 19 24 Calcium has a characteristic acoustic signature: brighter than the reference adventitia, with shadowing of deeper arterial structures. By this definition, IVUS detected target lesion calcium in 73% of the 1155 lesions studied. This approaches the highest pathological incidence reported.

IVUS can assess the arc, length, and distribution patterns of coronary artery calcification (eg, superficial versus deep, lesion-associated versus reference segment, concordant versus opposite maximum plaque thickness).1 The mean arc of target lesion calcium was 115°; 26% of the lesions had >180° of lesion calcium. Target lesion calcium was most often superficial in location; in an eccentric lesion, calcium was most often concordant to the maximum plaque-plus-media thickness.

Besides being a marker for significant coronary artery disease, target lesion calcification is the major determinant of the acute procedural success of many transcatheter therapies. The final lumen dimensions, the amount of residual plaque, and the weight of tissue retrieved after directional coronary atherectomy are related to the arc and location of IVUS target lesion calcium.12 41 42 Conversely, rotational atherectomy preferentially ablates calcium.22 23 For a given burr size, rotational atherectomy achieves a larger lumen in the presence of significant calcium than in the absence of calcium.43 Although excimer laser angioplasty appears to ablate calcium in vitro,44 45 this has not been confirmed by IVUS in vivo; instead, excimer laser angioplasty causes shattering of lesion-associated calcific deposits.46

Target lesion calcium has been implicated in some procedural complications and as a risk factor for restenosis.47 For example, calcification (even focal calcium) is the major reason for dissection after balloon angioplasty, and it may influence the length and severity of balloon angioplasty–induced dissections.11

The relation of the calcific deposit to the maximum plaque thickness may also be important. Thus, a relatively small arc of superficial calcium "protecting" the leading edge of an eccentric lesion may have a greater impact than a larger, deeper arc. This type of lesion appears to occur frequently and may be better treated with rotational atherectomy. Balloon angioplasty may just stretch the thinner wall opposite the calcific plaque; similarly, the calcific plaque may lead a directional atherectomy device to cut into the thinnest part of the plaque. Conversely, although uncommon, an arc of calcium superficial to the minimum plaque thickness may be equally important. If such a lesion is treated with rotational atherectomy, preferential calcium ablation could result in erosion of the burr through the thinnest part of the plaque. Even though calcified, this type of lesion may be better approached with other transcatheter techniques.

There are limitations to the ultrasound assessment of target lesion calcium. IVUS can identify only the leading edge of a calcific deposit, not its thickness. Similarly, IVUS cannot detect a deep calcific deposit behind a superficial calcific deposit. As transducer frequencies are increased to improve resolution and tissue characterization, the ability of ultrasound to see through significant amounts of noncalcified plaque may be tested. Thus, deep calcium may be hidden until the bulky superficial plaque is removed; and densely fibrotic noncalcified plaque may not be penetrated and cause shadowing to be confused with calcium. On IVUS imaging, all calcium appears the same; however, there is evidence that not all calcium has the same physical properties.48

Determinants of Angiographic Calcification
The overall diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography was 59%. Although angiography may be highly specific (89%) for the presence of lesion calcium, it was fairly insensitive in the presence of one or two quadrants or short lengths of calcium. These results are similar to other reports in which IVUS detected target lesion calcium far more often than angiography.2

By discriminant analysis, the IVUS variables predictive of angiographic calcification were (1) the arc of target lesion calcium, (2) the arc of superficial calcium, (3) the length of reference segment calcium, and (4) the location (superficial versus deep) of lesion calcium. In fact, however, calcium thickness may be as important a determinant of the angiographic detection of lesion-associated calcium. Coronary angiography not only detected superficial calcium more often than deep calcium but also detected superficial calcium that was concordant to the maximum plaque-plus-media thickness more often than superficial calcium that was opposite the maximum plaque-plus-media thickness. Because ultrasound cannot measure calcium thickness, superficial calcium (especially superficial calcium that is concordant to the maximum plaque thickness) may represent a thicker (and therefore more radiopaque) calcific deposit compared with deeper lesion calcium.

The fact that the reference segment length of calcium was an independent predictor of angiographic calcification emphasizes the limitations of angiography in localizing calcium. Reference segment calcium may be partially responsible for the false-positive rate of coronary angiography in predicting IVUS target lesion calcium. In this study, however, isolated reference segment calcium (reference segment calcium in the absence of lesion calcium) was distinctly unusual. The presence of periadventitial calcification (beyond the penetration depth of IVUS and, therefore, not included in this analysis) could be an alternative explanation.

Last, this study validated the morphological classification of angiographic calcium (none versus moderate versus severe). Severe angiographic calcification (radiopacities noted without cardiac motion before contrast injection generally compromising both sides of the arterial lumen) was associated with quantitatively more ultrasound calcium (and qualitatively more superficial calcium) compared with moderate angiographic calcium (radiopacities noted only during the cardiac cycle before contrast injection).

Limitations
This was neither an acute nor chronic outcome study. Therefore, the primary limitation of this study is the lack of outcome data relative to the patterns of ultrasound calcification described. However, on one hand, focal calcification has been shown to be important in the genesis of dissections after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty,11 while on the other hand, the overall arc of target lesion calcium has been shown to be important in determining the acute results after directional coronary atherectomy.42 Additional study with a larger number of lesions in each subset will be necessary to relate each pattern of calcification to specific (eg, device-related) outcomes. Similarly, additional study will be necessary to determine the discriminating threshold that precludes specific device use.

Conclusions
IVUS analysis shows that target lesion calcification is ubiquitous in coronary artery disease; the prevalence of target lesion calcification exceeds 70%, and the mean arc of calcification is 115°. IVUS can assess the arc, length, and distribution patterns of coronary artery calcification (eg, superficial versus deep, lesion-associated versus reference segment, relation to maximum plaque thickness). The sensitivity of angiography approaches 50%, with a specificity of almost 90%. By discriminant function analysis, angiographic calcium detection and classification were dependent on the IVUS arc of target lesion calcium, arc of superficial calcium, length of reference segment calcium, and location of calcium within the lesion.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by the Cardiology Research Foundation, Washington, DC, and Medlantic Research Institute, Washington, DC.

Received August 1, 1994; revision received October 12, 1994; accepted November 13, 1994.


*    References
up arrowTop
 up arrowAbstract
 up arrowIntroduction
 up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Mintz G, Douek P, Pichard A, Kent K, Satler L, Popma J, Leon M. Target lesion calcification in coronary artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1149-1155. [Abstract]
  2. The GUIDE Trial Investigators. Initial report of the `GUIDE' Trial for intravascular ultrasound imaging in coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:223A. Abstract.
  3. Blankenhorn D. Coronary arterial calcification: a review. Am J Med Sci. 1961;242:4-49.
  4. Warburten R, Tampas J, Soule A, Taylar HI. Coronary artery calcification: its relationship to coronary artery stenosis and myocardial infarction. Radiology. 1968;91:109-115. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Frink R, Achor R, Braun AJ, Kincaid O, Brandenburg R. Significance of calcification of the coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1970;26:241-247. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Detrano R, Wong N, French W, Tang W, Georgiou D, Young E, Brezden O, Doherty T, Brundage B. Prevalence of fluoroscopic coronary calcific deposits in high-risk asymptomatic persons. Am Heart J. 1994;127:1526-1532. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Fallavollita J, Brody A, Bunnell I, Kumar K, Canty JJ. Fast computed tomography detection of coronary calcification in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients <50 years old. Circulation. 1994;89:285-290. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Stanford W, Thompson B, Weiss R. Coronary artery calcification: clinical calcification and current methods of detection. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:1139-1146. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Breen J, Sheedy PI, Schwartz R, Stanson A, Kaufmann R, Moll P, Rumberger J. Coronary artery calcification detected with ultrafast CT as an indication of coronary artery disease. Radiology. 1992;185:435-439. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Loecker T, Schwartz R, Cotta C, Hickman JJ. Fluoroscopic coronary artery calcification and associated coronary artery disease in asymptomatic young men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1167-1172. [Abstract]
  11. Fitzgerald P, Ports T, Yock P. Contribution of localized calcium deposits to dissection after angioplasty: an observational study using intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 1992;86:64-70. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Fitzgerald PJ, Muhlberger VA, Moes NY, Friedrich G, Connolly AJ, Strunk BL, Amidon TM, Robertson GC, Selmon MR, Vetter JW, Yock PG. Calcium location within plaque as a predictor of atherectomy tissue retrieval: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1992;86(suppl I):I-516. Abstract.
  13. Potkin B, Keren G, Mintz G, Douek P, Pichard A, Satler L, Kent K, Leon M. Arterial responses to balloon coronary angioplasty: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:942-951. [Abstract]
  14. Pandian N, Kreis A, Brockway B, Isner J, Sacharoff A, Boleza E, Caro R, Muller D. Ultrasound angioscopy: real-time, two-dimensional, intraluminal ultrasound imaging of blood vessels. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62:493-494. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Hodgson JM, Graham SP, Sarakus AD, Dame SG, Stephens DN, Dhillon PS, Brands D, Sheehan H, Eberle MJ. Clinical percutaneous imaging of coronary anatomy using an over-the-wire ultrasound catheter system. Int J Card Imaging. 1989;4:186-193.
  16. Gussenhoven E, Essed C, Lancee C, Mastik F, Frietman P, van Egmond F, Reiber J, Bosch H, van Urk H, Roelandt J, Bom N. Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: an in vitro study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:947-952. [Abstract]
  17. Nishimura R, Edwards W, Warnes C, Reeder G, Holmes DJ, Tajik A, Yock P. Intravascular ultrasound imaging: in vitro validation and pathologic correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:145-154. [Abstract]
  18. Potkin B, Bartorelli A, Gessert J, Neville R, Almagor Y, Roberts W, Leon M. Coronary artery imaging with intravascular high-frequency ultrasound. Circulation. 1990;81:1575-1585. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Nissen S, Grines C, Gurley J, Sublett K, Haynie D, Diaz C, Booth D, DeMaria A. Application of a new phased-array ultrasound imaging catheter in the assessment of vascular dimensions: in vivo comparison to cineangiography. Circulation. 1990;81:660-666. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Tobis J, Mallery J, Mahon D, Lehmann K, Zalesky P, Griffith J, Gessert J, Moriuchi M, McRae M, Dwyer M, Greep N, Henry W. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of human coronary arteries in vivo: analysis of tissue characterizations with comparison to in vitro histological specimens. Circulation. 1991;83:913-926. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Mallery J, Tobis J, Griffith J, Gessert J, McRae M, Moussabeck O, Bessen M, Moriuchi M, Henry W. Assessment of normal and atherosclerotic arterial wall thickness with an intravascular ultrasound imaging catheter. Am Heart J. 1990;119:1392-1400. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Mintz G, Potkin B, Keren G, Satler L, Pichard A, Kent K, Popma J, Leon M. Intravascular ultrasound evaluation of the effect of rotational atherectomy in obstructive atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1992;86:1383-1393. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kovach J, Mintz G, Pichard A, Kent K, Popma J, Satler L, Leon M. Sequential intravascular ultrasound characterization of the mechanisms of rotational atherectomy and adjunct balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1024-1032. [Abstract]
  24. Hodgson J, Reddy K, Suneja R, Nair R, Lesnefsky E, Sheehan H. Intracoronary ultrasound imaging: correlation of plaque morphology with angiography, clinical syndrome and procedural results in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;21:35-44. [Abstract]
  25. Painter J, Mintz G, Pichard A, Kent K, Sokolowicz L, Hughes M, Satler L, Popma J, Leon M. Clinical correlates of atherosclerosis in angiographically normal coronary artery reference segments: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:373A. Abstract.
  26. Popma J, Bashore T. Qualitative and quantitative angiography. In: Topol E, ed. Interventional Cardiology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1993;1:1052-1068.
  27. Mancini G, Simon S, McGillem M, LeFree M, Friedman H, Vogel R. Automated quantitative coronary angiography: morphologic and physiologic validation of a rapid digital angiographic method. Circulation. 1987;452-460.
  28. Dixon W, Brown M, Engelman L. BMDP Statistical Software Manual. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 1990.
  29. Waller B, Roberts W. Cardiovascular disease in the very elderly: analysis of 40 necropsy patients aged 90 years or over. Am J Cardiol. 1983;51:403-421. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Gertz S, Malekzadeh S, Dollar A, Kragel A, Roberts W. Composition of atherosclerotic plaques in the four major epicardial coronary arteries in patients >=90 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67:1228-1233. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Roberts W, Waller B. Effect of chronic hypercalcemia on the heart. Am J Med. 1981;71:371-384. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Sprecher D, Schaefer E, Kent K, Gregg R, Zech L, Hoeg J, McManus B, Roberts W, Brewer HJ. Cardiovascular features of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: analysis of 16 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:20-30. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Dinsmore R, Lees R. Vascular calcification in types II and IV hypercholesterolemia: radiographic appearance and clinical significance. Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144:895-899. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Meema H, Oreopoulos D, deVeber G. Arterial calcifications in severe chronic renal disease and their relationship to dialysis treatment, renal transplant, and parathyroidectomy. Radiology. 1976;121:315-321. [Abstract]
  35. Gianrossi R, Detrano R, Colombo A, Froelicher V. Cardiac fluoroscopy for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a meta analytic review. Am Heart J. 1990;120:1179-1188. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Detrano R, Markovic D, Simpfendorfer C, Franco I, Hollman J, Grigera F, Stewart W, Ratcliff N, Salcedo EE, Leatherman J. Digital subtraction fluoroscopy: a new method of detecting coronary calcification with improved sensitivity for the prediction of coronary disease. Circulation. 1985;71:725-732. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Masuda Y, Naito S, Ayagi Y, Yamada Z, Uda T, Morooka N, Watanabe S, Inagaki Y. Coronary artery calcification detected by CT: clinical significance and angiographic correlates. Angiology. 1990;41:1037-1047.
  38. Agatson AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamante MJ, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcification using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827-832. [Abstract]
  39. Tanenbaum SR, Kondos GT, Veselik KE, Prendergast MR, Brundage BH, Chanka EV. Detection of calcific deposits in coronary arteries by ultrafast computed tomography and correlation with angiography. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:870-872. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Kaufmann R, Sheedy PI, Breen J, Kelzenberg J, Kruger B, Schwartz R, Moll P. Detection of heart calcification with electron beam CT: interobserver and intraobserver reliability for scoring quantification. Radiology. 1994;190:347-352. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Popma JJ, Mintz GS, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Chung YC, Matar F, Bucher TA, Merritt AJ, Leon MB. Clinical and angiographic outcome after directional coronary atherectomy: a qualitative and quantitative analysis using coronary arteriography and intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:55E-64E.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Matar F, Mintz G, Kent K, Pinnow E, Pichard A, Satler L, Kehoe K, Golden B, DeFalco R, Popma J, Leon M. Predictors of intravascular ultrasound endpoints after directional coronary atherectomy in 170 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:302A. Abstract.
  43. Fitzgerald P, Stertzer S, Hidalgo B, Myler R, Shaw R, Yock P. Plaque characteristics affect lesion and vessel response to coronary rotational atherectomy: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:353A. Abstract.
  44. Forrester J, Litvack F, Grundfest W, Mohr F, Papaioannou T, Goldenberg T, Laundenslager J. The excimer laser: current knowledge and future prospects. J Intervent Cardiol. 1988;1:75-80.
  45. Hoher M, Bogun F, Kochs M, Eggling T, Hombach V. Local calcification as a determinant of the outcome of excimer laser coronary angioplasty: an in vitro study. Coron Artery Dis. 1993;4:453-459. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Kovach J, Mintz G, Javier S, Henson K, Pichard A, Kent K, Satler L, Popma J, Leon M. Mechanisms of lumen enlargement after excimer laser angioplasty and adjunct balloon angioplasty: a sequential intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:449A. Abstract.
  47. Ellis SG, Roubin GS, King SB III, Douglas JS, Cox WR. Importance of stenosis morphology in the estimation of restenosis risk after elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:30-34. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Foreman DW, Mitchell JC, Baker PB. Physical chemical evidence of structural weakness in coronary arterial calcification. Cardiovasc Res. 1989;23:64-69.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. Burris, K. Schwartz, C.-M. Tang, M. S. Jafri, J. Schmitt, M. H. Kwon, O. Toshinaga, J. Gu, J. Brown, E. Brown, et al.
Catheter-based infrared light scanner as a tool to assess conduit quality in coronary artery bypass surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 419 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HeartHome page
E S Houslay, S J Cowell, R J Prescott, J Reid, J Burton, D B Northridge, N A Boon, D E Newby, and on behalf of the Scottish Aortic Stenosis and Lipi
Progressive coronary calcification despite intensive lipid-lowering treatment: a randomised controlled trial
Heart, September 1, 2006; 92(9): 1207 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
A. Kastrati, A. Dibra, J. Mehilli, S. Mayer, S. Pinieck, J. Pache, J. Dirschinger, and A. Schomig
Predictive Factors of Restenosis After Coronary Implantation of Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents
Circulation, May 16, 2006; 113(19): 2293 - 2300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
M. T. Castagna, G. S. Mintz, P. Ohlmann, J.-I. Kotani, A. Maehara, N. Gevorkian, E. Cheneau, E. Stabile, A. E. Ajani, W. O. Suddath, et al.
Incidence, Location, Magnitude, and Clinical Correlates of Saphenous Vein Graft Calcification: An Intravascular Ultrasound and Angiographic Study
Circulation, March 8, 2005; 111(9): 1148 - 1152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J.-i. Kotani, G. S. Mintz, P. B. Rai, C. K. Pappas, N. Gevorkian, A. B. Bui, A. D. Pichard, L. F. Satler, W. O. Suddath, R. Waksman, et al.
Intravascular ultrasound assessment of angiographic filling defects in native coronary arteries: Do they always contain thrombi?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 16, 2004; 44(10): 2087 - 2089.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
J. Shemesh, N. Koren-Morag, S. Apter, J. Rozenman, B. A. Kirwan, Y. Itzchak, and M. Motro
Accelerated Progression of Coronary Calcification: Four-year Follow-up in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 201 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Colombo, G. Stankovic, and J. W. Moses
Selection of coronary stents
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1021 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HeartHome page
F Prati, E Arbustini, A Labellarte, B Dal Bello, L Sommariva, M T Mallus, A Pagano, and A Boccanelli
Correlation between high frequency intravascular ultrasound and histomorphology in human coronary arteries
Heart, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 567 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
A. Farzaneh-Far, F. D. Knollmann, R. Felix, W. Bocksch, S. Spiegelsberger, M. Hummel, and R. Hetzer
Electron-Beam Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease After Heart Transplantation Response
Circulation, March 13, 2001; 103 (10): e60 - e60.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
J. Shemesh, S. Apter, C. I. Stroh, Y. Itzchak, and M. Motro
Tracking Coronary Calcification by Using Dual-Section Spiral CT: A 3-Year Follow-up
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 461 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
R. Mehran, G. Dangas, G. S. Mintz, A. J. Lansky, A. D. Pichard, L. F. Satler, K. M. Kent, G. W. Stone, and M. B. Leon
Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden and CK-MB Enzyme Elevation After Coronary Interventions : Intravascular Ultrasound Study of 2256 Patients
Circulation, February 15, 2000; 101(6): 604 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
T. J. Romer, J. F. Brennan III, G. J. Puppels, A. H. Zwinderman, S. G. van Duinen, A. van der Laarse, A. F. W. van der Steen, N. A. Bom, and A. V. G. Bruschke
Intravascular Ultrasound Combined With Raman Spectroscopy to Localize and Quantify Cholesterol and Calcium Salts in Atherosclerotic Coronary Arteries
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2000; 20(2): 478 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
S. G. Ellis, V. Guetta, D. Miller, P. L. Whitlow, and E. J. Topol
Relation Between Lesion Characteristics and Risk With Percutaneous Intervention in the Stent and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Era : An Analysis of Results From 10 907 Lesions and Proposal for New Classification Scheme
Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100(19): 1971 - 1976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
W. Stanford
Opening Plenary Session: 1998 : Coronary Artery Calcification as an Indicator of Preclinical Coronary Artery Disease
RadioGraphics, November 1, 1999; 19(6): 1409 - 1419.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. Gruberg, G. S. Mintz, L. F. Satler, K. M. Kent, A. D. Pichard, and M. B. Leon
Intravascular imaging and physiologic lesion assessment to define critical coronary stenoses
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 68(4): 1547 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. J. Taylor, A. P. Burke, A. Farb, P. Yousefi, G. T. Malcom, J. Smialek, and R. Virmani
Arterial remodeling in the left coronary system: The role of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 760 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HeartHome page
J Ge, F Chirillo, J Schwedtmann, G Görge, M Haude, D Baumgart, V Shah, C von Birgelen, S Sack, H Boudoulas, et al.
Screening of ruptured plaques in patients with coronary artery disease by intravascular ultrasound
Heart, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 621 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text]