(Circulation. 1995;91:1894-1895.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif.
Correspondence to Heinrich R. Schelbert, MD, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1735.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the negative predictive accuracy of the flow metabolism matches, 92%, resides at the upper end of the reported spectrum (ranging from 74% to 100%), the positive predictive accuracy, 76%, resides at the lower end of the spectrum, ranging from 73% to 95%.4 5 6 7 9 Several reasons might account for this. First, although the adequacy of the revascularization was evaluated anatomically on repeat angiography, it does not necessarily prove that nutrient blood flow had indeed been restored sufficiently. Second, myocardial 18F-deoxyglucose uptake was evaluated in the fasted state, whereas most laboratories rely on the postglucose loading state.4 5 6 7 When the same patients are evaluated in both the glucose-loaded and the fasted state, as recently reported from our laboratory, the latter condition increases the prevalence of flow metabolism mismatches.10 Regionally increased 18F-deoxyglucose uptake, seen only in the fasted state, may represent small islands of viability without functional consequences in response to revascularization. Thus, the fasted approach may be overly sensitive yet highly specific. A third possibility exists. A direct correlation between the postrevascularization gain in segmental systolic wall motion and the prerevascularization severity of the wall motion impairment has been described.11 The present study provides little if any information on wall motion severity. If the wall motion impairment was relatively mild, as the only modest reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction might imply, it could account for the lower incidence in postrevascularization improvements in wall motion.
A second interesting aspect of this study is the comparison of the resting flow defects with the postrevascularization changes in segmental systolic wall motion. It is not surprising that severe (>50%) flow reductions reflected mostly nonviable myocardium. Cell survival and, thus, viability depend on delivery of substrates as well as on removal of inhibitory metabolites. Thus, some degree of residual tissue blood flow becomes critical. The threshold level of 50% appears high, yet it is similar to that noted on single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)12 and, as postulated by the authors, may be artifactual because of high background activity. Conversely, the poor positive predictive value for only mild to modest flow reductions (<50% below control) similarly is not surprising, even if it is at odds with recent findings on SPECT 201Tl or 99mTc-sestamibi imaging.12 On the one hand, flow reduction involving the entire myocardial wall, although with transmural differences, might account for a modest overall flow reduction. On the other hand, it may also result from the coexistence of scar tissue in the endocardial and of normal myocardium in the epicardial half of the myocardial wall. Restoration of blood flow would be anticipated to improve wall motion only in the first scenario but not in the second one. Therefore, the variable functional outcome after revascularization is expected.
The discrepancy of the PET findings with those on SPECT imaging with 201Tl or 99mTc-sestamibi remains unexplained.12 This discrepancy leads to the third major point of the Tamaki report,1 the incremental effect of stress-induced flow defects on the positive predictive accuracy. The present study does not offer information on whether exercise stress produced new flow defects, worsened already existing defects, or both. If such stress-induced defects occurred in segments with already modestly severe flow defects at rest, the mechanisms accounting for the added positive predictive accuracy would seem rather complex. If, as is more likely, a segmental wall motion abnormality was present together with only a mild flow defect or no defect at all, the exercise-induced flow deficit might have been an integral part of "repetitive stunning." Blood flow at rest may be well preserved or even normal in "repetitively stunned myocardium," yet wall motion is reduced and, importantly, flow reserve is markedly attenuated or even absent.13 An increase in demand thus produces ischemia followed by stunning. Revascularization eliminates the culprit. Thus, wall motion would improve. The situation may be similar for "viable myocardium" as identified by only mild to modest reductions in 99mTc-sestamibi uptake12 or with 201Tl reinjection.14 In both situations, the tracer uptake appears to reflect mostly blood flow, unlike the 201Tl uptake on late imaging, which more strongly reflects the potassium pool. Even though rest blood flow and thus flow tracer uptake may be relatively normal if dysfunctional myocardium results from "repetitive stunning," it is likely to exhibit an artifactual flow defect due to a partial volumerelated underestimation of the true tracer tissue concentrations. This is because of a decline in the average wall thickness due to a loss of systolic thickening together with the poorer spatial resolution of SPECT. Induction of wall motion abnormalities alone resulted in a 37±9% artifactual "flow defect."15 If, in the case of SPECT studies of viability, flow defects of <50% severity are indeed frequently artifactual and partial volumerelated and true blood flow is normal or minimally reduced, it might explain the high predictive accuracy of SPECT for viability assessment.
While the present study leaves a number of questions on myocardial viability assessment unanswered, it nevertheless is an important contribution to the PET approach for identifying reversible dysfunction, for offering some potential insights into underlying mechanisms, and especially for its relevance for viability assessments versus SPECT imaging.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received January 26, 1995; accepted January 26, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Y. Szeto, R. C. Gorman, J. H. Gorman III, and M. A. Acker Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 785 - 802. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Gorman, J. H. Gorman III, and L. H. Edmunds Jr. Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 751 - 769. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Flameng, B. Shivalkar, B. Spiessens, A. Maes, J. Nuyts, J. VanHaecke, and L. Mortelmans PET Scan Predicts Recovery of Left Ventricular Function After Coronary Artery Bypass Operation Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1997; 64(6): 1694 - 1701. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Shivalkar, A. Maes, M. Borgers, J. Ausma, I. Scheys, J. Nuyts, L. Mortelmans, and W. Flameng Only Hibernating Myocardium Invariably Shows Early Recovery After Coronary Revascularization Circulation, August 1, 1996; 94(3): 308 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |