(Circulation. 1995;91:1368-1374.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From Queen's University (J.O.P.), Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and 3M Pharmaceuticals, St Paul, Minn.
Correspondence to John O. Parker, MD, Cardiovascular LabKidd 3, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart St, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 2V7.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design trial with treadmill exercise tests at days 0, 1, 7, 15, and 30. Tests were carried out up to 12 hours after patch application. There was a statistically significant treatment effect with increases in treadmill walking time to moderate angina in each nitroglycerin patch group compared with placebo at various time points up to 12 hours throughout the 30-day study period. Secondary efficacy parameters, including the consistent increase in time to 1-mm ST-segment depression, supported the primary efficacy results. There was no evidence of tolerance or rebound.
Conclusions Intermittent transdermal nitroglycerin therapy increases exercise duration and maintains anti-ischemic effects for 12 hours after patch application, throughout 30 days of therapy, without significant evidence of nitrate tolerance or rebound phenomena.
Key Words: angina nitroglycerin exercise
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study was designed to assess the antianginal and anti-ischemic efficacy of each of three doses of transdermal nitroglycerin, compared with placebo, during 30 days of intermittent patch therapy. Importantly, the study also provided the opportunity to assess whether tolerance developed during the study period and whether rebound effects occurred during periods of patch removal.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patient Selection
Male and female patients, 25 years of age
or older, with stable
angina pectoris present for at least 3 months, were eligible for
this investigation. This study was approved by the ethics committees of
all participating institutions, and each patient provided written
informed consent before enrollment.
The patients had to experience
angina during exercise testing. In male
patients with a classic history of angina, the presence of horizontal
or downsloping ST-segment depression of
1 mm when measured 80
milliseconds after the J-point was considered sufficient evidence of
coronary disease and myocardial ischemia to be included in the study.
Female patients and patients with nonanalyzable ST segments were
included if they had angina during treadmill testing and had at least
one of the following: angiographic evidence of significant coronary
artery disease, previous myocardial infarction, positive thallium
stress test, positive exercise radionuclide ventriculogram, or a
positive stress echocardiogram.
Patients taking ß-adrenergic blocking agents were allowed to continue these medications, but the daily dose was withheld until after the final exercise test on each study day. Calcium channel blockers, digoxin, and nitrates other than sublingual nitroglycerin were not permitted during the study period. Patients with myocardial infarction or unstable angina or those who underwent revascularization procedures within 3 months were excluded, as were patients with significant valvular heart disease, uncontrolled hypertension, or congestive heart failure.
Qualification Period
Patients who entered the qualification
period had to complete a
series of treadmill exercise tests (TETs) using either the
standard11 or abridged* Bruce protocol.
Moderate angina, which was defined as the level of discomfort at which
the patient would normally discontinue activity, had to develop within
3 to 7 minutes of the start of the first TET. One hour later, and 5
minutes after taking 0.4 mg of sublingual nitroglycerin, exercise was
repeated, and patients had to demonstrate at least a 20% increase in
the time to moderate angina. On fulfilling these criteria, the patients
continued in the qualifying period, and in a single-blind fashion, wore
three placebo patches for 12 hours each day (8 AM to 8
PM). Patient diaries were completed during this qualifying
period and the subsequent treatment phase to determine the number of
angina attacks and the frequency of nitroglycerin consumption occurring
during the patch-on and patch-off periods. Patients subsequently were
required to have three consecutive TETs, during which exercise duration
to moderate angina was within 15% of the preceding test and was
reached between 2.5 to 7.5 minutes. This qualified the patient for
entry into the double-blind treatment phase of the study.
Treatment Period
Upon demonstrating TET reproducibility, the
patient had
additional TETs at 4, 8, and 12 hours on that day (day 0). During the
interval between day 0 and day 1 (1 to 10 days), patients continued to
wear placebo patches intermittently. On day 1, after the hour 0 TET,
patients were randomized to receive either placebo patches or
nitroglycerin patches delivering 0.2 mg/h, 0.4 mg/h, or 0.8
mg/h
, with no individual dose titration. The
nitroglycerin patches used were 0.2 mg/h and 0.4 mg/h, and patients
wore a combination of active and/or placebo patches to provide the
randomized dose. The patches were removed for 12 hours overnight during
the double-blind treatment phase, and new patches were applied each
morning.
During the double-blind treatment phase, TETs were performed on days 1, 7, 15, and 30. On days 1 and 30, TETs were performed just before patch application (hour 0) and 4, 8, and 12 hours after patch application. On days 7 and 15, TETs were performed just before patch application and at hour 4, the point at which the peak nitrate effect was anticipated.
Sample Size Estimation
Assuming a standard deviation of 60
seconds, it was determined
that 60 completed patients per treatment group would be required to
provide 80% power to detect a difference of 10% in the time to
moderate angina between any given dose of nitroglycerin and placebo.
The
-level for the three comparisons of interest in the trial was
set at 0.017 to adjust for multiple comparisons. Two-tailed comparisons
were planned, and all statistical tests were performed using
SAS version 6.07.12 13 14
Treatment Group Comparability
Overall treatment differences
in patient demographics,
cardiovascular history, concomitant ß-adrenergic blocker use, and
baseline exercise test results were statistically analyzed using
two-way ANOVA (treatment and center, PROC GLM),
2 (PROC FREQ), or exact probability
tests (PROC FREQ). A two-sided P value of .05 or
less was considered statistically significant.
Efficacy Analyses
The primary measure of efficacy in this
study was the treadmill
walking time (TWT) to moderate angina. If moderate angina was not
experienced during a test, the total exercise duration was substituted
for that value. Secondary measures of efficacy included time to the
onset of angina, time to the development of 1-mm ST-segment depression,
frequency of angina, and the use of sublingual nitroglycerin.
Within-Day Change
TET parameters at each testing time were
compared with hour 0 on
each study day. The changes for each treatment group were statistically
analyzed using a two-sided, paired t test as generated using
PROC MEANS.
Comparisons With Day 0
Treatment effect compared with placebo
was defined as the
difference between within-day changes in TWT on each study day and the
within-day changes seen on day 0. This treatment effect was compared
among treatment groups using a two-way ANOVA (PROC GLM)
with treatment and center. Adjusted treatment means were determined
(LSMEANS option in GLM), and pairwise
comparisons of each dose level of nitroglycerin and placebo were tested
using Dunnett's multiple comparison test. In addition, an
intent-to-treat analysis, which included all patients randomized to
treatment, also was performed on this primary efficacy measure.
Maintenance of Treatment Effect
The treatment effect at hour
4 on days 1, 7, 15, and 30 was
examined using a profile analysis to determine if the magnitude of
treatment effect was maintained. Repeated-measures analysis with
linear, quadratic, and cubic contrasts of the day effect was used to
quantify the change in treatment effect over the 30 days of
therapy.
Secondary Parameters
Time to onset of angina and the time to
1-mm ST-segment
depression were analyzed as previously described for within-day changes
and day 0 comparisons. Analyses of within- and between-treatment group
differences were performed for frequency of angina and sublingual
nitroglycerin use. Separate analyses were performed for the patch-on
and the patch-off periods using the corresponding qualification period
as a baseline.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Fifty-one patients were
excluded from the efficacy analyses
(Table 2
). Twenty-one patients were discontinued from
the study due to adverse events, the most common of which was headache.
Not unexpectedly, a higher proportion of patients receiving 0.8 mg/h
were discontinued due to nitroglycerin-related adverse events.
|
Efficacy Analysis
Within-Day Change
The results
of the exercise times to the development of moderate
angina throughout the study phase are shown in Fig 1
and
Table 3
.
|
|
Day 0 (Placebo Day)
All
patients received placebo patches in a single-blind
manner on day 0. During the course of this placebo day, TWT times
increased at hour 4 for all groups and progressively decreased
throughout the rest of the day.
Day 1
After the
first double-blind patch application on day 1, all
groups increased exercise duration at hour 4 in comparison to hour 0 on
that day. Subsequently, the 0.4 mg/h and 0.8 mg/h groups showed
significant improvement at 8 and 12 hours, while there was a
significant decrease in TWT in those receiving placebo.
Days 7 and 15
On days 7 and 15, significant
increases relative to hour 0
occurred at hour 4 in all three active treatment groups
(P<.001), while TWT decreased in the placebo group.
Day 30
On day 30, each of the three active
treatment groups showed
significant improvement over hour 0 at hour 4 (P<.001), and
the 0.4 mg/h and 0.8 mg/h groups showed significant increases at hour 8
(P<.001). At hour 12, the increase in TWT compared with
hour 0 was similar for the two higher-dose groups and was significant
in the 0.8 mg/h nitroglycerin group and approached significance
(P<.056) in the 0.4 mg/h group. In contrast, there was a
progressive decrease in TWT in the placebo group that reached
significance at hour 12 (P<.001).
Comparisons
With Day 0
This measure utilizes the pretreatment placebo reference
(day 0)
to compare changes seen during the treatment period at days 1, 7, 15,
and 30 in each dose group. This forms the basis for comparison with the
placebo group. The results demonstrated a significant
(P
.017) treatment effect, with increases in TWT to
moderate angina in all three treatment groups compared with placebo at
various time points (Fig 2
). It is of importance that on
day 30, all three nitroglycerin groups showed significant increases in
TWT at hour 12, and there was a decrease in TWT in the placebo
group.
|
The intent-to-treat analysis (Table 3
and Fig
2
), which includes
all patients randomized to treatment, showed similar results.
Maintenance of Treatment Effect
Maintenance of
clinical efficacy throughout the 30-day study
period was assessed by comparing the magnitude of the treatment effects
at hour 4 on days 1, 7, 15, and 30. Over the 30-day treatment period,
the therapeutic effect of transdermal nitroglycerin was maintained.
Importantly, the significant increases in TWT at 8 and 12 hours on day
1 were maintained on day 30, further supporting the maintenance of
treatment effect (Fig 3
).
|
Secondary Efficacy Parameters
Onset of Angina
TWT to the onset of angina increased at every time point on every
study day for all three active treatment groups. These treatment
effects were significant at hour 4 on all days except for the 0.4 mg/h
group on day 1.
ST-Segment Depression
Comparisons
with day 0 in the TWT to the onset of 1-mm ST-segment
depression are shown in Fig 4
. Throughout the study
period, the majority of time points shows significant differences from
placebo (P
.012). It is of importance that after 30 days,
all three nitroglycerin groups showed significant prolongation of TWT
to 1-mm ST-segment depression.
|
Angina Frequency and
Nitroglycerin Use
Only patients with stable, reproducible,
effort-induced angina
were eligible to enter the study, and consequently, these patients had
reasonably low frequencies of angina (mean, 1.7 attacks per week) and
sublingual nitrate use (mean, 0.8 tablets per week) during the patch-on
phase of the qualifying placebo period. During double-blind treatment,
the frequency of angina attacks during patch-on periods was decreased
significantly relative to the qualification phase in all four treatment
groups (means, -0.9, -0.7, -0.8, and -0.4 attacks per
week in the
placebo, 0.2 mg/h, 0.4 mg/h, and 0.8 mg/h treatment groups,
respectively). There were no significant differences detected between
nitroglycerin treatment groups and placebo. Corresponding decreases in
sublingual nitroglycerin use also were shown (means, -0.3, -0.4,
-0.4, and -0.3 tablets per week in the placebo, 0.2 mg/h, 0.4
mg/h,
and 0.8 mg/h treatment groups, respectively), with no significant
differences between the nitroglycerin and placebo groups.
As expected, the number of anginal attacks (mean, 0.6 attacks per week) and frequency of sublingual nitroglycerin use (mean, 0.4 tablets per week) was lower in the overnight patch-off period than the daytime patch-on periods for all groups in the qualifying period, and this continued during the double-blind study periods. The changes in anginal attacks (means, -0.2, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.2 attacks per week in the placebo, 0.2 mg/h, 0.4 mg/h, and 0.8 mg/h treatment groups, respectively) and sublingual nitroglycerin use (means, -0.04, 0.2, 0.2, and 0.4 tablets per week in the placebo, 0.2 mg/h, 0.4 mg/h, and 0.8 mg/h treatment groups, respectively) during patch-off periods showed no significant differences between the placebo and active treatment groups.
Hour 0 Results
During the course
of the double-blind treatment phase, there was
an increase in TWT at the end of the patch-off period (hour 0) on days
1, 7, 15, and 30 relative to that observed at hour 0 on day 0. This
increase was seen for each treatment group, with a somewhat greater
increase seen in the placebo group. The 0.2 mg/h group showed
significant differences from the placebo group. Apart from day 7 in the
0.4 mg/h group, the 0.4 mg/h and 0.8 mg/h groups showed no significant
changes in TWT at hour 0 from that seen in the placebo group.
Safety
Transdermal nitroglycerin patches were well tolerated
during the study period. Twenty-one (7.2%) patients who received
double-blind treatment were discontinued due to adverse advents. These
consisted primarily of headache. Two patients, while receiving placebo
therapy, had a myocardial infarction. One patient in the 0.4 mg/h group
had unstable angina. Another patient in the 0.4 mg/h group had
hypotension and bradycardia, probably related to nitroglycerin
administration. A total of 103 patients (35%) experienced headaches,
but in the majority of patients, this was successfully treated with
acetaminophen, and these patients carried on with the study. Seventeen
patients (6%) had local skin reactions at the application site, but in
no case did this lead to patient discontinuation. There were no patient
deaths during the study.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The clinical efficacy of each dose of nitroglycerin was confirmed by the finding that the time to 1-mm ST-segment depression was consistently prolonged throughout the 30-day study in each active treatment group.
The doses used in this study were similar to those of a previous large multicenter trial with intermittent transdermal nitroglycerin therapy.7 The treatment effect in that study was documented on day 1, but by day 29, efficacy could only be shown at 8 hours, and only in the larger doses.
It has been suggested that rebound phenomena may occur after patch removal during intermittent therapy. This was based in part on a study where some patients reported an increased frequency in rest angina during the patch-off period.7 Because of difficulties of the definition and documentation of true rest angina by patient diary, the total frequency of angina in the patch-off period was evaluated in the present study. The frequency of angina in the patch-off period was less than during the day in all study groups. There were no significant differences in angina frequency during patch-off periods in the active and placebo groups.
The other finding in a previous study suggestive of rebound was the so-called "zero-hour effect," where exercise duration before the morning patch application declined slightly in the patients receiving active therapy while it increased in patients receiving placebo. In the present study, all groups showed improvement in the hour 0 exercise test throughout the 30-day study period. The improvement was similar for the 0.4 mg/h, 0.8 mg/h, and placebo groups, with the placebo group having a statistically significant difference from the 0.2 mg/h group. Because this difference did not occur with the larger doses, it is believed that this does not present a rebound phenomena. This conclusion is supported by the observation regarding the frequency of angina and nitroglycerin consumption during the patch-off period.
The results of this large multicenter study document that intermittent transdermal nitroglycerin is effective in the management of patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. There was prolongation of exercise duration to moderate angina and to 1-mm ST-segment depression in each dose group over a 12-hour period throughout the duration of the 30-day study. The study also showed that this treatment regime was not associated either with the development of tolerance or evidence of rebound during the period of patch removal.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Minitran (nitroglycerin) Transdermal Delivery System, 3M Pharmaceuticals,
6.7 cm2 (0.2 mg/h) and 13.3 cm2 (0.4 mg/h)
patches. ![]()
Minitran Clinical Trial Study Group Study Centers
University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario: Michael
G. Baird, MD; Margaret Fraser, RN.
Oklahoma Cardiovascular and Hypertension Center, Oklahoma City, Okla: Steven Chrysant, MD; Catherine Chrysant, MD.
Portland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Portland, Ore: Henry DeMots, MD; Barbara Keeton.
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif: Robert Detrano, MD, PhD; Barbara Vaitovas.
Medical Research Center, New Orleans, La: C. Andrew De Abate, MD.
Clinical Research, Internal Medicine Specialists, Brea, Calif: Michael Dougherty, MD; Barbara Manning.
Cardiovascular Center of Sarasota, Sarasota, Fla: Mahfouz A. El Shahawy, MD, FACC; June Wheeler.
Hospital of Albert Einstein, College of Medicine, Bronx, NY: William H. Frishman, MD; Suzanne Furia, RN, BSN.
Lawrence Clinical Research, Lawrenceville, NJ: W. Thomas Garland, MD; Jane Alliprandini.
Doctors' Clinic Research, Vero Beach, Fla: Arthur L. Glaser, MD; Betsy A. Screws, RN.
Charleston Cardiology Associates, Charleston, SC: William J. Grossman, MD; Kathleen Fletcher, RN.
Centre Epic, Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Martin Juneau, MD; Lucie Larivee.
Osteopathic Medical Center of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa: Joseph S. Kenney, DO.
The Christ Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio: Dean J. Kereiakes, MD; Linda Martin, RN; Linda Anderson, RN.
Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: W. Peter Klinke, MD; Linda Kvill.
University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada: William Kostuk, MD; Rita Kennedy.
Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada: J.F. Lopez, MD; Patricia Kuny, RN.
Cardiology Consultant Laboratory, Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Patrick Ma, MD; Neil G. Filipchuk, MD; Mag Grose, RN.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Claude Maranda, MD; Elizabeth Graham.
Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada: John O. Parker, MD; Bernice Farrell, RN.
Center for Clinical Research, Austin, Tex: Thomas Parker, MD; Tammy Watkins, RN.
Beverly Hills Cardiology Research, Beverly Hills, Calif: William E. Shell, MD; Angila Kapit.
Louisiana Cardiovascular Research Center, New Orleans, La: William B. Smith, MD; Tina Serpas, RN.
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala: James Taylor, MD; Cynthia Olsson.
Cardiology Center, Marrero, La: Craig Unger, MD; Phyllis Ponti.
St Luke's Hospital, Denver, Colo: Nampalli Vijay, MD; Melinda Washam, RN.
Foothills Provincial Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada: J. Wayne Warnica, MD; Brenda Smith.
University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Fla: Donald J. Weidler, MD, PhD; Nader S. Jallad, PhD.
Cardiology Research Associates, Ormond Beach, Fla: David L. Williams, MD; Diane Tracy, RN; Diane Martin, RN.
Clinical Physiology Associates, Fort Myers, Fla: Stephen R. Zellner, MD; David D. Michie, PhD; Glenda Younger.
Received June 27, 1994; revision received October 5, 1994; accepted October 14, 1994.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Riechek N, Goldstein RE, Redwood DR, Epstein SE. Sustained
effects of nitroglycerin ointment in patients with angina pectoris.
Circulation. 1974;50:348-352.
3. Crean PA, Ribeiro P, Crea F, Davies GJ, Ratcliffe D, Maseri A. Failure of transdermal nitroglycerin to improve chronic stable angina: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double crossover trial. Am Heart J. 1984;108:1494-1500. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Sullivan M, Savvides M, Abouantoun S, Madsen EB, Froelicher V. Failure of transdermal nitroglycerin to improve exercise capacity in patients with angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;5:1220-1223. [Abstract]
5. Parker JO, Fung HL. Transdermal nitroglycerin in angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:471-476. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Steering Committee, Transdermal Nitroglycerin Cooperative Study. Acute and chronic anti-anginal efficacy of continuous twenty-four hour application of transdermal nitroglycerin. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:1263-1273. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. DeMots H, Glasser SP. Intermittent transdermal nitroglycerin therapy in the treatment of chronic stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:786-793. [Abstract]
8. Cowan JC, Bourke JP, Reid DS, Julian DG. Prevention of tolerance to nitroglycerin patches by overnight removal. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:271-275. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Parker JD, Farrell B, Fenton T, Cohanim M, Parker JO.
Counter-regulatory responses to continuous and intermittent therapy
with nitroglycerin. Circulation. 1991;84:2336-2345.
10.
Ferratini M, Pirelli S, Merlini P, Silva T, Pollavini G.
Intermittent transdermal nitroglycerin monotherapy in stable
exercise-induced angina: a comparison with a continuous schedule.
Eur Heart J. 1989;10:998-1002.
11. Bruce RA. Evaluation of functional capacity and exercise tolerance of cardiac patients. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis. 1956;25:321-326. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. SAS Institute Inc. SAS® Language: Reference, Version 6, ed 1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1989:846.
13. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Version 6, ed 4, vol 1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1989:943.
14. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Version 6, ed 4, vol 2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1989:846.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Gori and J. D. Parker Nitrate-Induced Toxicity and Preconditioning: A Rationale for Reconsidering the Use of These Drugs J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 22, 2008; 52(4): 251 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Chaitman, S. L. Skettino, J. O. Parker, P. Hanley, J. Meluzin, J. Kuch, C. J. Pepine, W. Wang, J. J. Nelson, D. A. Hebert, et al. Anti-ischemic effects and long-term survival during ranolazine monotherapy in patients with chronic severe angina J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2004; 43(8): 1375 - 1382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Chaitman Efficacy and Safety of a Metabolic Modulator Drug in Chronic Stable Angina: Review of Evidence from Clinical Trials Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2004; 9(1_suppl): S47 - S64. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. George, I. Kitzis, D. Zandorf, M. Golovner, I. Shapira, S. Laniado, and A. Roth Safety of Nitrate Withdrawal in Angina-Free and Hemodynamically Stable Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Chest, November 1, 2003; 124(5): 1652 - 1657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Zvara Treatment of Perioperative Myocardial Ischemia Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, July 1, 2001; 5(2): 166 - 183. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Eccles, N. Rousseau, P. Adams, and L. Thomas Evidence-based guideline for the primary care management of stable angina Fam. Pract., April 1, 2001; 18(2): 217 - 222. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Azevedo, A. M. Schofield, S. Kelly, and J. D. Parker Nitroglycerin withdrawal increases endothelium-dependent vasomotor response to acetylcholine J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 2001; 37(2): 505 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Zwinderman, T. J. Cleophas, H. van der Sluijs, M. G. Niemeyer, B. P. Buunk, E. E. van der Wall, T. J. Cleophas, and Dutch Mononitrate Quality of Life Study Group Comparison of 50-mg and 100-mg Sustained-Release Isosorbide Mononitrate in the Treatment of Stable Angina Pectoris: Effects on Quality-of-Life Indices Angiology, December 1, 1999; 50(12): 963 - 969. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. A. Caramori, A. G. Adelman, E. R. Azevedo, G. E. Newton, A. B. Parker, and J. D. Parker Therapy with nitroglycerin increases coronary vasoconstriction in response to acetylcholine J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1998; 32(7): 1969 - 1974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zanzinger, J. Czachurski, and H. Seller Impaired Modulation of Sympathetic Excitability by Nitric Oxide After Long-term Administration of Organic Nitrates in Pigs Circulation, June 16, 1998; 97(23): 2352 - 2358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Parker and J. O. Parker Nitrate Therapy for Stable Angina Pectoris N. Engl. J. Med., February 19, 1998; 338(8): 520 - 531. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
INTERMITTENT NITROGLYCERIN PATCHES EFFECTIVE WITHOUT REBOUND Journal Watch (General), March 14, 1995; 1995(314): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |