| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 1995;91:1347-1353.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division (W.G.H., C.L., R.A.L., J.E.W., L.D.H., R.M.P.), and Department of Radiology (G.D.C., R.M.P.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Correspondence to Ronald M. Peshock, MD, Mary Nell and Ralph B. Rogers Magnetic Resonance Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5801 Forest Park, Dallas, TX 75235-9085.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Eighteen survivors of myocardial infarction (11 men and 7 women, aged 35 to 74 years) who were consecutively referred for cardiac catheterization underwent contrast coronary angiography and cine MR coronary angiography. Sequential overlapping images of the infarct artery were acquired with cine MR during 15- to 20-second periods of breath-holding. In each study, proximal, middle, and distal segments of infarct arteries were classified as having antegrade, collateral, or no flow. The infarct artery was the left anterior descending in 10 patients, the right anterior descending in 7, and the circumflex in 1. When compared with the results of contrast angiography, MR imaging correctly identified the presence or absence of antegrade flow in the infarct artery of all 18 patients. In addition, cine MR coronary angiography with presaturating pulses correctly established the presence or absence of collateral filling of the distal portion of occluded arteries in 6 of 7 subjects.
Conclusions In survivors of myocardial infarction, cine MR coronary angiography can reliably determine the patency and direction of flow in the infarct artery.
Key Words: myocardial infarction magnetic resonance imaging angiography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Images of the carotid,9 peripheral,10 and renal11 arteries have been obtained with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI). By applying multiple phase-encoding steps within each cardiac cycle, investigators have reduced imaging times and visualized coronary arteries during 15 to 25 seconds of breath-holding.12 13 However, these studies obtained single images of coronary arteries in diastole and could not be used to assess the direction of flow. We have developed a method of obtaining cine coronary MR angiograms by acquiring multiple images during a single breath-hold, thereby allowing an assessment of anatomy and direction of flow. The present blinded, prospective study was performed to assess the ability of this technique to determine the patency of the infarct artery in survivors of myocardial infarction.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MRI Technique
MRI was performed with a 1.5-T Picker Vista HPQ
whole-body
imaging system (Picker International, Inc) with a standard quadrature
spine coil (20x26 cm2) used as a radiofrequency receiver.
Each patient underwent MRI in the supine position after placement of
ECG monitoring leads, a respiratory gating belt, and the surface coil
on the chest. The strategy for determining infarct artery patency was
to (1) review the 12-lead ECG and, based on published
criteria,15 select the likely infarct artery; (2) perform
MR scout images to locate the left ventricle; (3) image the infarct
artery from its origin to within 3 cm of the cardiac apex; and, in
subjects in whom signal dropout occurred within the vessel, (4)
presaturate the proximal portion of the vessel to determine the
presence or absence of antegrade flow distal to the region of
dropout.
Scout images were obtained using a fast field echo sequence with first-moment compensation in the readout and slice-select directions, a repetition time of 20 milliseconds, and an echo time of 9.4 milliseconds. Phase-encoding grouping was used to obtain multiple-phase encoding steps for each frame during a cardiac cycle. Coronal and long-axis views of the heart were obtained with a phase-encoding grouping size of 4 (yielding 6 frames per cardiac cycle) to 10 (yielding 4 frames per cardiac cycle). These localizing scans were 8-mm slices, had a field of view of 50 cm, a flip angle of 40°, and a resolution of approximately 3 mm in the phase-encoding direction and 2 mm in the readout direction.
After obtaining scout views, we imaged the
infarct artery in
short-axis, tangential, and longitudinal planes. The purpose of these
scans was to visualize the infarct vessel from its origin to 3 cm from
the cardiac apex. Images were obtained with the same number of phases
and phase-encoding grouping sizes as those of the scout images, with
two modifications: (1) the field of view was decreased to 22 to 26 cm,
thereby decreasing pixel sizes to 1.0 to 1.2 mm in the phase-encoding
direction and 0.8 to 1.0 mm in the readout direction, and (2) an
in-plane presaturation pulse was applied at the first frame of each
cardiac cycle (sequence A, Fig 1
). The presaturation
pulse suppresses the signal from the tissue in the slice so inflowing
blood appears bright compared with stationary tissue. Applying the
presaturating pulse in early systole provided good contrast in multiple
frames during early and middle diastole when coronary flow is high.
When viewing the images in a cine loop, we found this to be the best
strategy for preserving important information in early diastole. The
short-axis views were single-slice acquisitions, whereas the tangential
and longitudinal views were four-slice acquisitions (8-mm slices, each
with 4-mm overlap). All views of the infarct artery were obtained with
sequence A, and no fat saturation pulses were used. Fig 2
illustrates the typical imaging strategy used for the
left anterior descending artery.
|
|
Infarct arteries were imaged in two to
three orthogonal planes.
Arterial segments were divided into proximal, middle, and distal
portions, according to previously published techniques,16
with two exceptions: (1) the posterior descending artery was included
as a portion of the distal right or circumflex arteries, and (2) the
circumflex artery was divided into two segments: proximal, which
included portions of the artery up to the first obtuse marginal branch,
and distal, which included portions of the artery past it. After these
scans were finished, if an area of signal dropout was seen along the
course of the vessel of interest, imaging sequence B (Fig 1
)
was used
to determine whether the signal dropout was due to a stenosis or an
occlusion.
Two aspects of the presaturation technique used for
determining the
presence or absence of antegrade flow in the cases in which signal
dropout occurred (sequence B) were different from the technique used
initially to image the infarct artery (sequence A). The first was that
the presaturating planes in sequence B (the two gray slices in Fig
2
)
were not in the imaging plane of the vessel. They were positioned to
intersect the vessel segment proximal to the point of signal dropout
and to saturate blood flowing antegrade through the infarct artery. The
flip angle of each presaturation slice was limited such that the
proximal vessel segment (the point of intersection of the two pulses)
received maximal saturation, and the proximal aorta or left ventricle
received minimal saturation. In this way, blood flowing to other
coronary beds from the proximal aorta or left ventricle was mixed with
unsaturated blood. At any point during the cardiac cycle, blood flowing
antegrade through the proximally presaturated region would cause signal
loss in the distal vessel. If retrograde flow was present (via
collaterals), blood filling the distal portion of the coronary artery
would not have been exposed to proximal presaturation pulses and would
therefore appear bright. This technique is fundamentally similar to
standard MR angiography for suppressing signal in arteries or veins and
determining the direction of flow.17
The second difference
in the presaturation pulses used in sequence B
was their temporal placement in relation to the imaging pulses during
the cardiac cycle. As shown in Fig 1
, the presaturation pulses
occurred
before each frame in the cardiac cycle, so blood in the proximal
coronary artery was saturated just before each frame was imaged. The
use of repeated saturation with multiple frames in the cardiac cycle
was necessary to ensure that antegrade flow did not occur at some point
during the cardiac cycle when the images were reviewed in cine format.
If the vessel distal to the presaturation pulses became dark, this was
interpreted as movement of saturated blood into that segment, thereby
establishing the presence of antegrade flow through the original area
of signal dropout. After application of sequence B, a bright residual
signal seen in the distal vessel lumen was interpreted as collateral
flow. Sequence B was repeated with the flip angles of the presaturation
pulses set to 0°. In cases in which antegrade flow was present
within the infarct artery, this led to return of signal in distal
segments.
MR images were stored on optical disks for subsequent recall and analysis. To determine interobserver variability, images were reviewed in cine format by two investigators blinded to the results of contrast coronary angiography. Intraobserver variability was determined by one investigator (R.M.P.) who reviewed the studies a mean of 4 months after their completion. The proximal, middle, and distal segments of the infarct artery were assessed as having antegrade flow, no flow, or collateral flow.
Contrast Angiography
Selective coronary angiography was
performed according to
standard techniques. Images were interpreted by physicians blinded to
the MRI results. In the infarct artery, flow was assessed according to
the criteria described by the TIMI investigators.18
Antegrade flow was classified as absent for TIMI 0 or 1 flow and
present for TIMI 2 or 3 flow.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In all 18 patients, cine MR angiography correctly identified the presence or absence of antegrade flow in the infarct artery. In the 6 patients in whom imaging sequence B was used, 2 were correctly identified as having antegrade flow (TIMI grade 3 flow by catheterization) and 4 were correctly identified as having occlusions of the infarct artery (TIMI grade 0 flow at catheterization). When the 18 infarct arteries were divided into segments (proximal, middle, and distal for the left anterior descending artery and right coronary artery, proximal and distal for the circumflex), MRI correctly identified the presence or absence of antegrade or collateral flow in 50 of 53 segments. Although an abrupt cessation of flow was seen in the posterior left ventricular branch of patient 8, collateral flow distal to this was not seen on MRI. On angiography this distal vessel was seen to be less than 1 mm in diameter and to have sluggish flow. The proximal and middle segments of the left anterior descending artery in patient 12 were misclassified as being occluded with collateral flow. On angiography the proximal segment was seen to have 75% stenosis and a long thrombus extending into the middle portion of the artery. In the distal portion of the vessel, the artery was occluded, and extensive collaterals supplied the distal artery. MRI demonstrated the area of signal dropout in the proximal and middle segments with extensive collaterals and bright signal in the distal vessel. Thus, investigators using MRI knew an occlusion was present, but because an extensive area of signal dropout was noted in the proximal segment (due to thrombus), the proximal and middle segments were thought to be the site of occlusion.
MRI intraobserver variability was assessed by having one investigator
read the studies without knowledge of the catheterization results at
the time of their completion and then repeat his reading a mean of 4
months after the studies were performed. There was agreement between
the readings in all 18 cases. Interobserver variability was assessed by
having a second investigator read the studies without knowing the first
reader's results or the catheterization findings. In 17 of 18 cases,
there was agreement with the reading of the first investigator. There
was disagreement regarding the reading of the case in patient 14. Upon
review of the second investigator's analysis, it was determined
that he had misread the left anterior descending artery as being the
circumflex artery and had therefore classified the vessel as open.
Representative studies from patients 7 and 5 are displayed in
Fig 3
and Fig 4
, respectively. Figs
5
and 6
demonstrate the presaturation
technique for determining the source and direction of flow in a
vessel.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In previous MRI studies of the coronary arteries, epicardial vessels were successfully identified in 73% to 100% of subjects.12 13 To reduce motion artifact and improve the signal-to-noise ratio, patients were imaged in a prone position, which some could not tolerate. Furthermore, the distal segments of the coronary arteries, particularly the posterior descending artery, often were not visualized. Because only a single diastolic image was obtained, the differentiation of epicardial arteries from veins was sometimes difficult. Finally, these studies often could not determine whether flow (via collaterals) distal to a region of signal loss was antegrade or retrograde. Our imaging technique was designed to eliminate these shortcomings. First, our patients were in the supine position, with the surface coil resting on the chest; this was well tolerated. Second, we obtained multiple, overlapped 8-mm slices positioned in orthogonal planes, thereby allowing visualization of distal vessels, including the posterior descending artery, during cardiac motion. Third, incorporating cine imaging with four to seven frames per cardiac cycle permitted visualization of flow at several intervals during the cardiac cycle. This enabled visualization of flow in arteries during early diastole, facilitating the differentiation of arteries from veins. Fourth, in 6 patients we distinguished antegrade from retrograde (collateral) flow in middle and distal arterial segments by positioning presaturation pulses orthogonal to the imaging plane across proximal portions of vessels.
Our technique of coronary MR angiography has four limitations: (1) The study was limited to patients in sinus rhythm, because image acquisition must be gated to the cardiac cycle. Although patients with irregular rhythms could be studied with respiratory gating and arrhythmia rejection, the time required for image acquisition would increase. (2) We concentrated on imaging the infarct artery. Examination of vessels in other territories as well would prolong image acquisition time. (3) Signal dropout in vessel segments led to incorrect assessment of the direction of flow in 3 of 53 vessel segments. In patient 8, this was probably due to sluggish flow in the posterior left ventricular branch, which on angiography was seen to be less than 1 mm in diameter. Higher-resolution scanning would be necessary to view smaller vessels. In patient 12, a significant stenosis and thrombus proximal to the site of occlusion caused signal dropout such that this portion of the artery was not visualized. As postulated in the case of patient 8, sluggish flow may have been present in the proximal portion of the artery. The case was correctly identified as a closed artery on the basis of the direction of flow in the distal vessel segment. (4) In this study of survivors of myocardial infarction consecutively referred for catheterization, we enrolled only 1 patient in whom the circumflex was the infarct artery. This was not unexpected, because the circumflex artery is known to be the site of significant stenosis and infarction in only 7% to 15% of patients with myocardial infarction.6 28 29 Previous MR coronary angiographic studies12 have noted decreased sensitivity and specificity for detecting vessels on the lateral wall of the left ventricle; however, special coils or phased-array units that improve the signal from the lateral and posterior walls could improve these results.
In conclusion, in survivors of myocardial infarction, MRI with fast field echo sequences can reliably determine the presence or absence of antegrade flow in the infarct artery. The use of cine MRI enables visualization of flow in epicardial vessels throughout the cardiac cycle. Our data indicate that presaturation pulses positioned across proximal vessels are useful for distinguishing the direction of flow in middle and distal vessel segments.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 6, 1994; revision received September 12, 1994; accepted September 28, 1994.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Grupppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1986;1:397-401. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
The GUSTO Angiographic Investigators. The effects of tissue
plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary-artery
patency, ventricular function, and survival after acute myocardial
infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1615-1622.
4. Kennedy JW, Ritchie JL, Davis KB, Fritz JK. Western Washington randomized trial of intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:1477-1482.[Abstract]
5. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1988;2:349-360. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Cigarroa RG, Lange RA, Hillis LD. Prognosis after acute myocardial infarction in patients with and without residual antegrade coronary blood flow. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:155-160. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Trappe HJ, Lichten PR, Klein H, Wenzloff P, Hartwig CA.
Natural history of single vessel disease: risk of sudden coronary death
in relation to coronary anatomy and arrhythmia profile. Eur Heart
J. 1989;10:514-524.
8. Johnson LW, Lozner EC, Johnson S, Krone R, Pichard AD, Vetrovec GW, Noto TJ. Coronary arteriography 1984-1987: a report of the registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions, I: results and complications. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989;17:5-10. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Ruggiere PM, Laub GA, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT. Intracranial
circulation: pulse-sequence considerations in three-dimensional
(volume) MR angiography. Radiology. 1989;171:785-791.
10. Owens RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med. 1992;326: 1577-1581.
11. Kent KC, Edelman RR, Kim D, Steinman TI, Porter DH, Skillman JJ. Magnetic resonance imaging: a reliable test for the evaluation of proximal atherosclerotic renal arterial stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1991;178:311-318.
12.
Manning WJ, Wei L, Boyle NG, Edelmann RR. Fat-suppressed
breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography.
Circulation. 1993;87:94-104.
13.
Debiao L, Paschal CB, Haacke EM, Adler LP. Coronary arteries:
three dimensional MR imaging with fat saturation and magnetization
transfer contrast. Radiology. 1993;187:401-406.
14. Cooperating Investigators From the MILIS Study Group. Electrocardiographic, enzymatic and scintigraphic criteria of acute myocardial infarction as determined from study of 726 patients (MILIS study). Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:1463-1471. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Rose GA, Blackburn H. Cardiovascular Survey Methods. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1968;56:137-140. WHO Monograph Series.
16.
Dodge JT, Brown BG, Bolsen EL, Dodge HT. Intrathoracic spatial
location of specified coronary segments on the normal human heart.
Circulation. 1988;78:1167-1180.
17. Potchen EJ, Haacke EM, Siebert JE, Gottschalk A, eds. Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Concepts and Applications. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1992:24.
18. Chesebro JH, Knatterud G, Roberts R, Borer J, Cohen LS, Dalen J, Dodge HT, Francis CK, Hillis D, Ludbrook P, Markis JE, Mueller H, Passamani ER, Powers ER, Rao AK, Robertson T, Ross A, Ryan TJ, Sobel BE, Willerson J, Williams DO, Zaret BL, Braunwald E. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, phase I: a comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Circulation. 1987;76: 142-154.
19. Gang ES, Lew AS, Hong M, Wang FZ, Siebert CA, Peter T. Decreased incidence of ventricular late potentials after successful thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:712-716. [Abstract]
20. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Wells PJ, Kremers MS, Hillis LD. Influence of antegrade flow in the infarct artery on the incidence of late potentials after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:554-558. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Force T, Kemper A, Leavitt M, Pareshi AF. Acute reduction in functional infarct expansion with late coronary reperfusion: assessment with quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:192-200. [Abstract]
22. Jeremy RW, Hackworthy RA, Bautovich G, Hutton BF, Harris PJ. Infarct artery perfusion and changes in left ventricular volume in the month after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9:989-995. [Abstract]
23. Califf RM, O'Neill WW, Stack RS, Aronson L, Mark DB, Mantell S, George BS, Candella RJ, Kereiakes DJ, Abbottsmith C, Topol EJ, and the TAMI Study Group. Failure of simple clinical measurements to predict perfusion status after intravenous thrombolysis. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:658-662.
24. Krukoff MW, Green CE, Satler LF, Miller FC, Pallas RS, Kent KM, Del Negro AA, Pearle DL, Fletcher RD, Rackley CE. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery patency using continuous ST-segment monitoring. Am J Cardiol. 1986;57:916-922. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Devries SR, Sobel BE, Abendschein DR. Early detection of
myocardial reperfusion: assay of plasma MMcreatine kinase isoforms in
dogs. Circulation. 1986;74:567-572.
26. Wackers RJ, Gibbons RJ, Verani MS, Kayden DS, Pellikka PA, Behrendek T, Mahmarian JJ. Serial quantitative planar technetium-99m isonitrile imaging in acute myocardial infarction: efficacy for non-invasive assessment of thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:861-873. [Abstract]
27. Samdarshi TE, Nanda NC, Gatewood RP Jr, Ballal RS, Chang LK, Singh HP, Nath H, Kirklin JK, Pacifico AD. Usefulness and limitations of transesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of proximal coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19: 572-580.
28. Hillis LD, Winniford MD. Frequency of severe (70% or more) narrowing of the right, left anterior descending, and left circumflex coronary arteries in right dominant circulations with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:358-359. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Feit A, Rahman K, Nabil ES, Reddy CVR. Non-random occurrence of single-vessel coronary artery disease. Am J Med. 1984;77:683-684.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Plein, S. Bulugahapitiya, T. R. Jones, G. J. Bainbridge, J. P. Ridgway, and M. U. Sivananthan Cardiac MR Imaging with External Respirator: Synchronizing Cardiac and Respiratory Motion—Feasibility Study Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 877 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Langerak, H. W. Vliegen, J. W. Jukema, P. Kunz, A. H. Zwinderman, H. J. Lamb, E. E. van der Wall, and A. de Roos Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Noninvasive Detection of Stenosis in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts and Recipient Coronary Arteries Circulation, March 25, 2003; 107(11): 1502 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Hundley, L. D. Hillis, C. A. Hamilton, R. J. Applegate, D. M. Herrington, G. D. Clarke, G. A. Braden, M. S. Thomas, R. A. Lange, R. M. Peshock, et al. Assessment of Coronary Arterial Restenosis With Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of Coronary Flow Reserve Circulation, May 23, 2000; 101(20): 2375 - 2381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. F. Foo, V. B. Ho, and M. N. Hood Vessel Tracking: Prospective Adjustment of Section-selective MR Angiographic Locations for Improved Coronary Artery Visualization over the Cardiac Cycle1 Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 283 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Hundley, C. A. Hamilton, G. D. Clarke, L. D. Hillis, D. M. Herrington, R. A. Lange, R. J. Applegate, M. S. Thomas, J. Payne, K. M. Link, et al. Visualization and Functional Assessment of Proximal and Middle Left Anterior Descending Coronary Stenoses in Humans With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, June 29, 1999; 99(25): 3248 - 3254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Hundley, R. A. Lange, G. D. Clarke, B. M. Meshack, J. Payne, C. Landau, R. McColl, D. E. Sayad, D. L. Willett, J. E. Willard, et al. Assessment of Coronary Arterial Flow and Flow Reserve in Humans With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, April 15, 1996; 93(8): 1502 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Clarke, R. Eckels, C. Chaney, D. Smith, J. Dittrich, W. G. Hundley, M. NessAiver, H. F. Li, R. W. Parkey, and R. M. Peshock Measurement of Absolute Epicardial Coronary Artery Flow and Flow Reserve With Breath-Hold Cine Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Circulation, May 15, 1995; 91(10): 2627 - 2634. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Dinsmore Noninvasive Coronary Arteriography— Here at Last? Circulation, March 1, 1995; 91(5): 1607 - 1608. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |