Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;91:462-470

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du, X.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Dart, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Du, X.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Dart, A. M.

(Circulation. 1995;91:462-470.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Sympatholytic Action of Intravenous Amiodarone in the Rat Heart

Xiao-Jun Du, MB, PhD; Murray D. Esler, FRACP, PhD; Anthony M. Dart, MRCP, PhD

From the Alfred and Baker Medical Unit, Baker Medical Research Institute and Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Correspondence to Dr X-J Du, Alfred and Baker Medical Unit, Baker Medical Research Institute, Commercial Rd, Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Amiodarone is a commonly used antiarrhythmic agent with complex pharmacological effects. Although ventricular arrhythmias can be suppressed soon after intravenous amiodarone, the mechanisms responsible for this action are unclear. We studied the effects of acute treatment with amiodarone on the metabolism and release of norepinephrine (NE) in intact rats and in perfused rat hearts.

Methods and Results Experiments were performed in anesthetized rats and in perfused, innervated hearts with amiodarone administered intravascularly. NE release was induced by electrical stimulation of the sympathetic ganglion. Concentrations of NE and its intraneuronal metabolite dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) in hearts, plasma, and coronary venous effluent were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Acute administration of amiodarone induced dose-dependent increases in DHPG concentrations in plasma (5 mg/kg, +48%; 15 mg/kg, +84%; and 50 mg/kg, +467%) and in coronary venous effluent (1 µmol/L, +37%; 3 µmol/L, +510%; and 10 µmol/L, +1100%) together with an unchanged basal overflow of NE. In perfused hearts, NE release evoked by nerve stimulation was inhibited by infusion of amiodarone (1 µmol/L, -16%; 3 µmol/L, -24%; and 10 µmol/L, -64%) or by intravenous amiodarone (50 mg/kg) given 1 hour before heart perfusion (-70%), and the extent of this suppression correlated well with levels of DHPG overflow present immediately before nerve stimulation. When given in vitro and in vivo, amiodarone also significantly reduced NE and increased DHPG content in the heart, leading to a raised DHPG/NE ratio. All these effects of amiodarone were similar to those found with reserpine but less potent. In contrast, oral amiodarone produced none of these effects.

Conclusions Acute administration of amiodarone in perfused hearts or intact rats induces partial NE depletion in the heart by interfering with vesicular NE storage and enhancing intraneuronal NE metabolism, effects associated with an impaired NE release during sympathetic activation. Oral dosing with amiodarone has no such effect. Further study is required to test whether this novel sympatholytic effect of amiodarone contributes to its antiarrhythmic action after intravenous administration.


Key Words: amiodarone • dihydroxyphenylglycol • norepinephrine • reserpine • nervous system


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Amiodarone is a potent antiarrhythmic agent with complex pharmacological properties. Enthusiasm for intravenous use of this drug is increasing after many clinical studies showing that an intravenous dosing regimen with amiodarone is particularly effective in abolishing resistant ventricular arrhythmias in heterogeneous clinical situations.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Animal experiments in different species have also documented a similar antiarrhythmic activity.12 13 14 15 16 17 18 In the clinic, high-dose oral amiodarone has been reported to suppress resistant ventricular arrhythmias within a few days.19 20 21 22 The mechanisms for such protection, however, are incompletely known. Although defined as a class III antiarrhythmic agent,23 amiodarone possesses, to differing degrees, activities of other drug classes, including sodium and calcium channel blockade23 24 25 26 and adrenergic antagonism.23 27 28 There is convincing evidence that sympathetic activation is an important factor for the genesis of ventricular arrhythmias.15 29 30 31 However, the effect of amiodarone on sympathetic neurotransmission, especially in the heart, has been little studied.

We report here results from a study in rats showing that acute treatment with amiodarone produces a pronounced sympatholytic action, an effect that probably contributes to the antiarrhythmic property of amiodarone given intravenously. Since the effects of amiodarone suggested a "reserpine-like" action, we also examined the effects of reserpine in similar experimental protocols to give insight into the mechanism of action of amiodarone.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Preparations
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (270 to 450 g) anesthetized with pentobarbitone (60 mg/kg IP) were used. Experiments were carried out either ex vivo in in situ perfused hearts or in anesthetized rats. For the in vitro experiments, the chest was opened, and after injection with heparin (200 U IV), a metal cannula was inserted into the ascending aorta to start coronary perfusion in situ.32 The perfusate was a modified Krebs-Henseleit solution containing (in mmol/L) NaCl 126, KCl 4.0, CaCl2 1.85, MgCl2 1.05, NaHCO3 25, Na2HPO4 0.5, glucose 11, and EDTA 0.027. The buffer was continuously gassed with 95% O2/5% CO2 (pH 7.4) and warmed to 37°C. Perfusion flow rates were controlled by a peristaltic pump and set at about 5 mL/g per minute by the heart weight estimated from body weight. The right atrium was cannulated for the collection of coronary venous effluent, with 85% to 100% recovery rate. In some experiments, a Millar microtip transducer catheter was positioned in the left ventricle through the apex to record the ventricular pressure and its first derivative (dP/dt).32 A 20-minute stabilizing period was allowed before experiments were started. Drugs were infused through a side arm of the perfusion line into the perfusion fluid with a model 22 pump (Harvard Apparatus). The left cervicothoracic stellate ganglion, with the cardiac nerves attached, was separated and mounted on a pair of bipolar electrodes for subsequent electrical stimulation with a model SD9 stimulator (Grass Instrument Co). The nerves were constantly superfused with warm and oxygenated buffer except when stimulated. Stimuli had a pulse width of 2 ms and a current of 0.8 mA. For experiments with anesthetized rats, the left femoral artery and the right femoral vein were cannulated for arterial blood sampling and infusion, and rats were allowed to recover for 20 minutes before experiments. Blood was collected (1 mL) at scheduled times, and plasma was separated. The separated red blood cells were resuspended in 0.5 mL Haemoccel and returned to the animals.

Catecholamine Assay
Samples of coronary venous effluent (from in vitro experiments) or plasma (from in vivo experiments) were immediately frozen on dry ice and stored at -80°C until assay with high-performance liquid chromatography.33 This method allowed simultaneous determination of norepinephrine (NE), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), and epinephrine. Catecholamines and DHPG were adsorbed with activated alumina, separated by high-performance liquid chromatography, and quantified by electrochemical detection. Concentrations of epinephrine in coronary effluent were very low (0 to 20 pg/mL) and therefore were not included in the data analysis. Hearts from in vivo and in vitro preparations were blotted dry, weighed, and stored at -80°C. They were then homogenized in 0.4 mol/L perchloric acid (5 mL per heart), and the catechols were assayed chromatographically.

Drugs Used
The amiodarone used was either a product of Sigma Chemical Co or a commercial preparation, Cordarone, from Winthrop Laboratories. Other agents used were desipramine, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80), reserpine, and DHPG, all obtained from Sigma.

Experimental Protocols
The experimental protocols in this study were approved by the Alfred Hospital and Baker Medical Research Institute Animal Experimentation Committee and were consistent with guidelines of the American Physiological Society.

To minimize the confounding influence of the neuronal reuptake mechanism on the issues investigated, a neuronal reuptake inhibitor, desipramine (final concentration of 0.3 µmol/L), was added to the perfusate in all experiments with perfused hearts.

Experiment 1
Effects of intravenous amiodarone on plasma and cardiac levels of catechols were examined in anesthetized rats (n=6 per group). In 3 groups, after collection of a control blood sample, amiodarone (Winthrop Laboratories) diluted in 5% glucose solution was infused intravenously, over a period of 2 minutes, at doses of 5, 15, and 50 mg/kg. Blood samples were then taken at 13, 30, and 60 minutes after the injection. Another 6 rats served as controls, receiving an intravenous injection with 5% glucose solution, and blood samples were taken before and 30 minutes after the injection. In 6 more rats, reserpine (dissolved in DMSO) was injected intraperitoneally at 5 mg/kg, and blood samples were obtained at 13, 30, and 60 minutes after the injection. At the end of the experiments, hearts were excised, washed, and weighed.

The commercial preparation of amiodarone contains 100 mg Tween 80 per 50 mg amiodarone. Tween 80 possesses certain hemodynamic and electrophysiological effects.24 To examine the effect of Tween 80 on the issue studied, a supplementary experiment was undertaken that involved intravenous injection of anesthetized rats with Tween 80 at 100 mg/kg (n=6), and arterial blood was collected immediately before and 13, 30, and 60 minutes after the injection. Plasma concentrations of catecholamines and DHPG were measured.

Experiment 2
Effects of intravenous treatment with amiodarone (Winthrop Laboratories) given in vivo on subsequent nerve stimulation-induced NE release in vitro (perfused hearts) and the reversibility of such effects were studied. Two groups of rats (n=7 each) were injected through the tail vein with amiodarone at 50 mg/kg over a 2-minute period. Heart perfusion and nerve stimulation experiments were carried out 1 hour (1 group) or 8 days (1 group) after the treatment. Arterial blood was collected immediately before heart perfusion. Sympathetic nerves were stimulated three times at 2, 4, and 8 Hz (in random order, 1-minute duration each at 10-minute intervals), and effluent was collected for 1 minute immediately before nerve stimulation and for a period of 2 minutes starting with nerve stimulation. Another 7 rats were injected with 5% glucose solution (controls), and heart perfusion and nerve stimulation experiments were performed 8 days after the injection according to the protocol described above.

Experiment 3
Effects of amiodarone and reserpine on basal overflow of NE and DHPG and on NE release in response to sympathetic nerve stimulation were studied in perfused hearts. Amiodarone (Sigma) was dissolved in 20% ethanol in water.13 Reserpine was dissolved in DMSO. They were infused into the perfusion flow with final concentrations of ethanol <.02% and of DMSO <.1%.

In 4 groups, hearts were treated with either amiodarone at 1, 3, or 10 µmol/L (equal to 0.68, 2.04, and 6.8 mg/L, respectively; 3 groups of 6 or 7 hearts) or vehicle (1 group, n=10). Ten minutes after infusion with amiodarone or vehicle, the sympathetic ganglion was stimulated at 5 Hz for 30 seconds. Coronary effluent was collected for a 1-minute period immediately before drug infusion, 3 and 10 minutes after drug infusion, and during nerve stimulation. For comparison, another 5 groups of hearts were treated with reserpine (final concentrations, 0.03, 0.3, 1, and 10 µmol/L, respectively; 4 groups of 6 hearts) or vehicle (DMSO 0.1%, 1 group, n=8). The same protocol as described above was followed. Furthermore, the possibility that a high DHPG level per se might interfere with NE release in response to nerve stimulation was tested in another group (n=6) by nerve stimulation applied twice (5 Hz for 1 minute) in the absence and presence of DHPG in the perfusate at a concentration of 2100 pg/mL (12.5 µmol/L).

To examine the effect of amiodarone versus reserpine on cardiac concentrations of catecholamines and DHPG, particularly NE and DHPG, three groups of hearts (n=6 per group) were subjected to 20-minute perfusion with amiodarone (10 µmol/L), reserpine (10 µmol/L), or vehicle, respectively. At the end of the 20-minute period, hearts were excised, weighed, and stored at -80°C for catechol assay.

Experiment 4
Effects of oral dosing with amiodarone (Sigma) on plasma and cardiac concentrations of catecholamines and metabolites and NE release in response to sympathetic nerve stimulation were investigated. Amiodarone was dissolved in water preheated to 50°C to 60°C and sonicated.34 In 2 groups (n=8 each), rats received gavage once daily with amiodarone (75 mg/kg) or water (controls) for 3 weeks. For comparison, another 8 rats were treated with reserpine (dissolved in DMSO, 0.5 mg/kg IP every second day) for 2 weeks. At the end of the treatment, rats were anesthetized and arterial blood samples were taken. Hearts were then perfused in situ, and sympathetic nerves were stimulated at 2, 4, and 8 Hz (in random order, 1-minute duration each at 10-minute intervals). Coronary effluent was collected for 1 minute immediately before and for a period of 2 minutes starting with each nerve stimulation. Concentrations of catecholamines and DHPG in plasma, coronary effluent, and hearts were analyzed. To test whether a high-dose loading regimen might have effects similar to those seen with intravenous amiodarone, 5 rats received gavage every 8 hours for 3 days with amiodarone at a daily dose of 450 mg/kg. Another 5 rats were gavaged similarly with water and served as controls. Rats were anesthetized 2 hours after the last dosing, and arterial blood was collected to measure plasma levels of catecholamines.

Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SEM. Differences between groups were tested for statistical significance by one- or two-way ANOVA or by unpaired or paired Student's t test. When applicable, a simultaneous multicomparison test (Scheffé) was applied only if the F statistical analysis indicated an overall statistical significance between group means. The probability values from multiple comparisons by Student's t test between two groups were corrected by Bonferroni's method. A value of P<.05 (after Bonferroni correction when applicable) was considered statistically significant. The least-squares method was used for linear regression and correlation between selected variables.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
There was no difference in the coronary perfusion flow for heart perfusion experiments (combined data from groups of control, 4.87±0.14 mL/g per minute; amiodarone, 4.86±0.06 mL/g per minute; and reserpine, 5.07±0.14 mL/g per minute) or in body weight for in vivo experiments (control, 389±14 g; amiodarone, 382±7 g; and reserpine, 368±18 g).

Effects of Amiodarone and Reserpine on Plasma Concentrations of Catechols In Vivo
In anesthetized rats, intravenous injection of amiodarone induced a dose-dependent increase in plasma DHPG, which was statistically significant in all 3 groups at each time point examined (Fig 1Down). Amiodarone at 5 mg/kg increased plasma DHPG by about 47%. At the highest dose, 50 mg/kg, there was an approximately 6-fold increase in plasma DHPG level 13 minutes after injection. Similarly, treatment with reserpine resulted in a more than 10-fold increase in plasma DHPG concentration at 13, 30, and 60 minutes (5520±831, 7763±186, and 6513±509 pg/mL versus 664±23 pg/mL at 0 minute, all P<.01). In all groups, plasma levels of NE were unchanged over the experimental period (Fig 1Down), but progressive increase in plasma concentrations of epinephrine was observed. In control rats injected with glucose solution, all parameters remained stable over the 30-minute period examined (data not shown).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Graphs showing changes in plasma concentrations of dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), norepinephrine (NE), and epinephrine after intravenous injection with various doses of amiodarone or with reserpine in anesthetized rats. n=6 per group. Plasma concentrations of DHPG and epinephrine increased significantly in all groups at each time point examined (P<.05). The DHPG data are given in the text for the purpose of showing the detail of changes in these groups with lower doses of amiodarone.

Tween 80 at 100 mg/kg showed no effect on plasma concentrations of DHPG measured at 13, 30, and 60 minutes (592±37, 640±31, and 656±16 versus 597±20 pg/mL, P=NS). Thus, these data do not indicate a confounding influence of Tween 80.

Effects of Amiodarone on DHPG Overflow and Neural NE Release in Perfused Hearts
DHPG overflow per minute was similar between groups before treatment with amiodarone (359 to 424 pg/g, P=NS). Amiodarone induced a concentration-dependent increase in DHPG overflow that was evident at 3 minutes and continued until at least 20 minutes after drug administration (Fig 2Down). The basal overflow of NE per minute was low and was not affected by amiodarone at lower doses (control, 165±22 pg/g; 1 µmol/L, 101±18 pg/g; and 3 µmol/L, 129±12 pg/g; all P=NS) but increased at 10 µmol/L (to 361±60 pg/g, P<.05).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Graph showing effect of concentrations of amiodarone on dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) overflow in perfused rat hearts. n=6 per group. *P<.05 and **P<.01 versus pretreatment values (0 minute) by paired t test.

NE overflow per minute into the effluent was low in hearts treated with reserpine at 0.03 µmol/L (10-minute value versus control, 273±33 versus 255±24 pg/g, P=NS) but increased slightly at higher doses (0.3 µmol/L, 473±27 pg/g; 1 µmol/L, 520±43 pg/g; and 10 µmol/L, 525±53 pg/g; all P<.05 versus control). Reserpine markedly enhanced DHPG overflow; 3 minutes (data not shown) after drug administration, DHPG overflow had already reached levels similar to those measured at 10 minutes for all doses tested (Fig 3Down).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Bar graphs showing effect of concentrations of amiodarone and reserpine on basal overflow of dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG, top) and on evoked norepinephrine (NE) release (bottom) in response to sympathetic nerve stimulation (5 Hz for 30 seconds) in the perfused rat heart. n=6 or 7 per group. **P<.01 versus respective control values.

In both control groups, nerve stimulation (5 Hz for 30 seconds) induced NE release of about 6000 pg/g (after the basal overflow was subtracted), and there was no significant difference between the two groups. In hearts treated with amiodarone or reserpine, quantities of evoked NE release were lower than the control values, and such reduction tended to be dose-dependent (Fig 3Up). Further analysis of the grouped data showed that there was a significant negative correlation between DHPG overflow measured immediately before nerve stimulation and evoked NE release in response to nerve stimulation (Fig 4Down). DHPG overflow was not affected by nerve stimulation in any of the groups (data not shown). Increasing perfusate DHPG concentration to 2100 pg/mL had no influence on evoked NE release (6524±851 versus 6588±1011 pg/g, P=NS by paired t test).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Graph showing correlation between basal dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) overflow immediately before sympathetic nerve stimulation and norepinephrine (NE) release induced by nerve stimulation (5 Hz, 30 seconds). Each point represents a group mean (±SEM) of 6 or 7 hearts from the experiment shown in Fig 4Up. ({circ}) indicates amiodarone groups; ({bullet}), reserpine groups.

Effects of Intravenous Amiodarone on Evoked NE Release in Perfused Hearts
There was a marked increase, compared with controls, in plasma levels of DHPG and epinephrine 1 hour after intravenous amiodarone at 50 mg/kg (both P<.01; TableDown). Eight days after the injection, these differences disappeared (all P=NS versus control and P<.01 versus 1-hour amiodarone groups). Plasma levels of NE were similar in all 3 groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Plasma Concentrations of DHPG, NE, and Epinephrine and Influences of Amiodarone Given Either Intravenously1 or Orally

In perfused hearts, there was a fivefold increase, after the 20-minute stabilizing period, in DHPG overflow into coronary effluent in those hearts in which perfusion started 1 hour after the injection (P<.01 versus either control or 8-day amiodarone groups). Such differences were no longer apparent in hearts perfused 8 days after amiodarone injection (Fig 5Down). Basal NE overflow was not significantly different between these groups.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Bar graphs showing basal overflow of norepinephrine (NE) and dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) (A) and sympathetic nerve stimulation–induced NE release (B) in perfused hearts from rats receiving intravenous injection with 5% glucose solution (control) or amiodarone (50 mg/kg). The interval between the injection and heart perfusion was 8 days for control rats and 1 hour or 8 days, respectively, for amiodarone-treated rats. n=7 per group. A, **P<.01 versus control or 8-day amiodarone groups by unpaired t test. For evoked NE release in B, P<.01 for 1-hour amiodarone versus control groups, P<.05 for 1-hour amiodarone versus 8-day amiodarone groups, and P<.05 for 8-day amiodarone versus control groups by two-way ANOVA.

In hearts of control rats, nerve stimulation induced frequency-dependent increases in NE overflow. In hearts in which perfusion started 1 hour after amiodarone injection, NE release induced by higher frequencies was suppressed by about 70% (P<.01 versus controls, Fig 5Up). Eight days after intravenous amiodarone, there was a significant recovery in the capacity for NE release during nerve stimulation (P<.05 versus 1-hour amiodarone group), but quantities of NE released were still about 30% to 40% lower than control values (P<.05).

Effects of Oral Amiodarone
Plasma concentrations of catechols and DHPG were similar between control rats and rats orally dosed for 3 weeks with amiodarone at 75 mg/kg (TableUp). A 3-day oral dosing with high-dose amiodarone (450 mg/kg) did not induce any change in plasma concentrations of DHPG, NE, or epinephrine (TableUp). In rats treated with reserpine for 2 weeks, plasma concentrations of NE and DHPG were reduced (82±12 and 329±30 pg/mL, respectively, P<.05 versus control), whereas those of epinephrine increased (545±57 pg/mL, P<.05), with a raised DHPG/NE ratio (4.71±1.01, P<.05).

In perfused hearts of control and 75-mg/kg amiodarone–treated rats, basal overflow of NE and DHPG was similar. Nerve stimulation induced a frequency-dependent release of NE, which was also similar between the two groups (Fig 6Down). Nerve stimulation did not affect the overflow of DHPG in any of the groups (data not shown). Treatment with reserpine reduced basal overflow of NE and DHPG by about 70% to 80% and almost totally abolished NE release in response to nerve stimulation (Fig 6Down).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Bar graphs showing (A) basal norepinephrine (NE) and dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) overflow and (B) NE release induced by sympathetic nerve stimulation, for a period of 1 minute, at different frequencies in perfused hearts of rats that had received oral treatment with amiodarone (75 mg/kg for 3 weeks) or intraperitoneal injection with reserpine (0.5 mg/kg every second day for 2 weeks). n=8 per group. A, **P<.01 versus control values by unpaired t test. B, P<.01 versus control group by two-way ANOVA.

Functional Response to Sympathetic Nerve Stimulation in Relation to NE Release
The left ventricular peak dP/dt at basal status was between 1500 and 1700 mm Hg/second and did not differ between drug-treated and control groups of experiments 2 and 4 (data not shown). In control hearts, dP/dt was increased by nerve stimulation in a frequency-dependent manner. With oral amiodarone treatment, the increase in inotropic response by sympathetic nerve stimulation was not significantly affected (Fig 7ADown, P=.10 by ANOVA). In contrast, in hearts of rats administered intravenous amiodarone, the increase in dP/dt produced by nerve stimulation was markedly inhibited during the acute phase (Fig 7BDown, P<.01). This was largely but not totally reversed 8 days afterward (P<.05 versus control). Chronic treatment with reserpine almost totally prevented the inotropic response to nerve stimulation (P<.01). There was a good correlation, on the basis of group means, between quantities of NE release (data in Figs 5Up and 6Up) and increases in dP/dt induced by nerve stimulation at different frequencies (Fig 7Down).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Graphs showing effects of oral (A) and intravenous (B) amiodarone on the net increase in the left ventricular dP/dt ({Delta}dP/dt) in response to sympathetic nerve stimulation at various frequencies in perfused hearts and the correlation between {Delta}dP/dt and norepinephrine (NE) release induced by nerve stimulation (C). Each point in C represents a group mean (±SEM). The inotropic response of the left ventricle was markedly suppressed in hearts from rats that received acute intravenous injection with amiodarone (B) or chronic treatment with reserpine for 2 weeks (A) (both P<.01 by ANOVA versus respective controls). There was also a significant reduction in hearts perfused 8 days after intravenous injection of amiodarone (B, P<.05). Oral administration of amiodarone (A) had no significant effect. n=6 to 8 hearts per group.

Amiodarone, Reserpine, and Cardiac Content of Catechols and DHPG
In hearts of rats treated with intravenous amiodarone (50 mg/kg) or intraperitoneal reserpine (5 mg/kg), the cardiac content of DHPG was increased and that of NE reduced significantly compared with control values (both P<.01). As a result, the DHPG/NE ratio was significantly increased (Fig 8Down, top). These changes were more pronounced in reserpine- than amiodarone-treated hearts (P<.05). Compared with control values, amiodarone and reserpine both significantly reduced epinephrine content (4.9±1.1 and 4.8±1.1 versus 12.5±2.8 ng/g, P<.01). In hearts perfused 8 days after the injection, there was a 19% reduction in NE content (485.9±14.6 versus 588±60.4, P<.05) without significant change in DHPG content (43.3±6.4 versus 49.4±4.0 ng/g), DHPG/NE ratio (0.089±0.02 versus 0.086±0.01, P=NS), or epinephrine content (10.0±1.6 versus 9.8±1.8 ng/g). Similar changes were observed in hearts perfused for 20 minutes with amiodarone or reserpine (both at 10 µmol/L, Fig 8Down, middle). Epinephrine content was reduced by reserpine (6.6±0.8 versus 10.8±1.8 ng/g, P<.05) but not by amiodarone (11.1±2.6 ng/g, P=NS versus control).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Bar graphs showing effects of amiodarone or reserpine on cardiac contents of norepinephrine (NE), dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), and the ratio of DHPG to NE in rat hearts. Top, Results were derived from hearts of rats 1 hour after intravenous injection with amiodarone (50 mg/kg) or 1 hour after intraperitoneal injection with reserpine (5 mg/kg). Middle, Results were obtained from perfused hearts after exposure to amiodarone or reserpine (both at 10 µmol/L) for 20 minutes. Bottom, Results were collected in hearts of rats receiving oral treatment with amiodarone daily (75 mg/kg) for 3 weeks or receiving intraperitoneal injection of reserpine every second day (0.5 mg/kg) for 2 weeks. *P<.05 versus controls. n=6 to 8 per group. C indicates control; A, amiodarone; and R, reserpine.

Three weeks after oral amiodarone at 75 mg/kg, cardiac contents of DHPG, NE, and epinephrine (7.6±1.2 versus 7.3±1.3 ng/g, P=NS) were basically unchanged compared with those of control rats gavaged daily (Fig 8Up, bottom). In contrast, 2 weeks of treatment with reserpine (0.5 mg/kg every second day) almost completely depleted NE content in the heart, together with reduced DHPG and epinephrine content (1.4±0.4 versus 7.3±1.3, P<.01) and a raised DHPG/NE (Fig 8Up).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study demonstrates that acute administration of amiodarone, either injected intravenously or added to the perfusion medium, induces dose-dependent increases in the overflow to plasma or coronary effluent of DHPG, the intraneuronal metabolite of NE. Such increased DHPG overflow was associated with a reduced cardiac NE content and a raised DHPG/NE ratio both in vivo and in vitro. The functional consequence of this acute effect is suppressed NE release and inotropic response during sympathetic nerve stimulation in the heart. In contrast, oral dosing of amiodarone did not produce similar effects. So far as we are aware, this is the first report of such a sympatholytic action of amiodarone.

The effects of amiodarone demonstrated in this study were remarkably similar to those of reserpine. Reserpine is actively taken up by storage vesicles, where it interferes with catecholamine translocation through the amine transport carrier and dissociates the ATP-NE complex.35 36 This leads to an increase in free NE concentration in the axoplasm and subsequently to an increase in DHPG formation catalyzed by monoamine oxidase. As a highly lipophilic metabolite,37 DHPG diffuses easily across the axoplasmic membrane and appears in the circulation. In contrast, at physiological pH, NE is positively charged and largely retained within the axoplasm. A progressive rise in the plasma concentration of epinephrine after amiodarone injection can also be explained by the inhibition of amine transport in chromaffin granules.36 Being a more lipophilic and less charged molecule than NE,37 epinephrine in the axoplasm then diffuses into the circulation. DHPG can also be formed from the fraction of released NE recaptured by the Uptake1 carrier.38 39 The contribution of this mechanism to the observations in the perfused heart, however, was minimized by addition of the Uptake1 inhibitor desipramine.

A partial NE depletion with an increased DHPG content found in perfused hearts and hearts of anesthetized rats after treatment with amiodarone or reserpine can be explained by an impaired inward translocation of NE, NE leakage from vesicles, and blockade of NE synthesis after prevention of the inward transport of the precursor dopamine.35 36 This acute effect can be totally attributable to amiodarone per se, since the tissue level of its major metabolite, desethylamiodarone, is very low at this stage.40 41 42 43 44 Although the proposed mechanism of amiodarone action is likely, we have not excluded the possibility that amiodarone may be a vesicular H+-ATPase inhibitor. Catecholamine transport is driven by a H+ (acid inside) and potential (positive inside) gradient across the vesicular membrane, and NE inward transport is coupled with H+ outward transport.45 46 If amiodarone were to inhibit H+-ATPase and subsequently disrupt the H+-gradient, the process of catecholamine transport would be similarly impaired. This possibility requires further study.

Another similarity between the two agents is their long-lasting action after a single-dose injection. For reserpine, the induced depletion in tissue content of catecholamine may last several weeks because of persistent binding of reserpine to storage vesicles.35 A full recovery of neurotransmission after a single injection of reserpine is dependent on formation and transport of new storage vesicles down the axon and refilling of these vesicles with newly synthesized NE, processes that require 4 to 5 weeks.36 We observed a moderate reduction in cardiac NE content even 8 days after a single injection of amiodarone, although at this time an increased DHPG concentration in the heart, plasma, or coronary effluent was no longer evident. It is possible that a similar procedure holds for the recovery of neuronal function after amiodarone treatment. The finding in intact rats that even 10 days after a bolus injection amiodarone remains detectable in the heart supports this view.40

An interesting finding in the present study is a reduced ability of nerve stimulation to release NE in the perfused heart after acute treatment with amiodarone. The functional importance of such an effect is indicated by a depressed inotropic response of the ventricle to sympathetic activation. In hearts perfused with amiodarone, the extent of inhibition of NE release was related inversely to the levels of DHPG overflow, suggesting a partial depletion of vesicular NE storage as the underlying mechanism. Indeed, myocardial content of NE was reduced after a short period of treatment with amiodarone. In hearts exposed to amiodarone in vivo or in vitro, the degree of this depletion was about 25% to 40%, values much less than the 60% to 70% reduction in quantities of NE release induced by nerve stimulation. This discrepancy may be explained by a more profound depletion by amiodarone or reserpine of a "readily releasable NE pool" than that of a "storage pool," which contributes predominantly to the total NE content. The existence of two different NE storage pools has previously been postulated.47 48

In contrast to the evident effects of amiodarone given intravenously, oral administration at the doses examined fails to achieve similar effects. One previous study observed unchanged cardiac NE content and evoked NE release in the dog heart in vivo after 3 weeks of oral amiodarone.50 The present study does not reveal the mechanism responsible for the differences between the two dosing regimens. Detailed pharmacokinetic studies in rats have shown that immediately after intravenous administration of amiodarone at doses of 50 to 100 mg/kg, the peak plasma level reached is up to 30 to 50 µg/mL, followed by a rapid accumulation of this drug in the myocardium, with a peak content of 100 to 300 µg/g, depending on dose and time of sampling.40 41 42 When given orally, bioavailability of amiodarone is low (about 35% to 40%). Latini et al50 reported the myocardial content of amiodarone to be 36 to 122 µg/g in rats with oral dosing at 75 to 150 mg/kg for 3 weeks. These values are lower than the maximum, although transient, cardiac content of amiodarone after intravenous injection, presumably because of lower plasma concentrations of amiodarone and continuous metabolism in the tissue. A similar difference in blood and tissue levels of amiodarone achieved by oral and intravenous regimens has also been observed in other species29 43 44 51 52 and in humans.1 51 53 Thus, the discrepancy in vesicular NE effects after different regimens seems to be due to higher tissue levels of amiodarone. However, this speculation cannot well explain the facts that intravenous amiodarone at lower doses, which would lead to lower tissue content of this drug, remains effective in inducing DHPG overflow while our high-dose oral dosing was ineffective. Thus, further study is needed to clarify whether intravenous and oral regimens of amiodarone are qualitatively different in regard to the effect on sympathetic neurons.

There is strong evidence that sympathetic activation is involved in the genesis of ventricular arrhythmias in a variety of cardiac disorders, such as myocardial ischemia and infarction and heart failure.30 31 32 54 Schwartz et al15 demonstrated in cats that intravenous amiodarone almost completely abolished ventricular tachyarrhythmias induced by a combination of acute ischemia and sympathetic ganglion stimulation. The striking difference in the rate of onset of antiarrhythmic activity between intravenous (minutes or hours) and oral (days or weeks) amiodarone is well known.1 24 Previous studies have indicated that different mechanisms may be responsible for the antiarrhythmic effects of intravenous and chronic oral amiodarone.14 15 16 17 23 55 56 The acute electrophysiological effects of intravenous amiodarone, especially prolongation of the action potential duration and effective refractory periods, are much less than those observed after long-term oral loading at conventional dosage.23 44 52 55 56 57 58 59 Conversely, intravenous amiodarone can achieve prompt blockade of slow channels and adrenergic receptors,1 16 17 23 although the ß-adrenergic blockade may also become apparent within a few days after oral loading at higher doses.60 Our data indicate a rapid onset of NE depletion and suppression of NE release by intravenous amiodarone, effects that may be, at least in part, responsible for the potent antiarrhythmic property seen after intravenous injection. This possibility remains to be examined.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates a novel pharmacological action of amiodarone, specifically a partial depletion of NE in the sympathetic neuron and reduction in NE release during sympathetic activation. These effects can be achieved only by intravenous dosing. We speculate that this sympatholytic action possibly contributes to the potent antiarrhythmic property of amiodarone given intravenously. It is also possible that this action of amiodarone is involved in the hemodynamic changes after intravenous administration by lowering overall sympathetic tone in the cardiovascular system.8 23 61 However, caution is necessary when extrapolating the findings from this study in the rat into a clinical context, since we have not examined this aspect in other species and in humans.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship grant (K.A.B. Smith Trust) from the Alfred Group of Hospitals Research Fund (Dr. Du) and by an Institute Grant to the Baker Medical Research Institute from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. The authors wish to thank Helen Cox and Andrea Turner for technical assistance in performing catecholamine assays.

Received July 6, 1994; accepted August 2, 1994.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Kadish A, Morady F. The use of intravenous amiodarone in the acute therapy of life-threatening tachyarrhythmias. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1989;31:281-294. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Hohnloser SH, Meinertz T, Dammbacher T, Steiert K, Jahnchen E, Zehender M, Fraedrich G, Just H. Electrocardiographic and antiarrhythmic effects of intravenous amiodarone: results of a prospective, placebo-controlled study. Am Heart J. 1991;121:89-95. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Kowey PR, Marinchak RA, Rials SJ, Rubin AM, Smith L. Electrophysiologic testing in patients who respond acutely to intravenous amiodarone for incessant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Am Heart J. 1993;125:1628-1631. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Mooss AN, Mohiuddin SM, Hee TT, Esterbrooks DJ, Hileman DE, Rovang KS, Sketch MH. Efficacy and tolerance of high-dose intravenous amiodarone for recurrent, refractory ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:609-614. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Helmy I, Herre JM, Gee G, Sharkey H, Malone P, Sauve MJ, Griffin JC, Scheinman MM. Use of intravenous amiodarone for emergency treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:1015-1022. [Abstract]

6. Nalos PC, Ismail Y, Pappas JM, Nyitray W, DonMichael TA. Intravenous amiodarone for short-term treatment of refractory ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Am Heart J. 1991;122:1629-1632. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Ochi RP, Goldenberg IF, Almquist A, Pritzker M, Milstein S, Pedersen W, Gobel FL, Benditt DG. Intravenous amiodarone for the rapid treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in critically ill patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:599-603. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Remme WJ, Kruyssen HACM, Look MP, van Hoogenhuyze DCA, Krauss XH. Hemodynamic effects and tolerability of intravenous amiodarone in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Am Heart J. 1991;122:96-103. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Scheinman MM for the IV Amiodarone Study Group. Multicenter study of the dose response to intravenous amiodarone in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. Circulation. 1993;88(pt 2):2126. Abstract.

10. Schutzenberger W, Leisch F, Kerschner K, Harringer W, Herbinger W. Clinical efficacy of intravenous amiodarone in the short term treatment of recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. Br Heart J. 1989;62:367-371. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Williams ML, Woelfel A, Cascio WE, Simpson RJ Jr, Gettes LS, Foster JR. Intravenous amiodarone during prolonged resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:839-842.

12. Lubbe WF, McFadyen ML, Muller CA, Worthington M, Opie LH. Protective action of amiodarone against ventricular fibrillation in the isolated perfused rat heart. Am J Cardiol. 1979;43:533-540. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Riva E, Hearse DJ. Anti-arrhythmic effects of amiodarone and desethylamiodarone on malignant ventricular arrhythmias arising as a consequence of ischaemia and reperfusion in the anaesthetised rat. Cardiovasc Res. 1989;23:331-339. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Marinchak RA, O'Connor KM, Friehling TD, Kowey PR. Acute electrophysiologic effects and antiarrhythmic/antifibrillatory activity of intravenous amiodarone in a chronic feline infarction model. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989;14:389-395. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Schwartz PJ, Vanoli E, Zaza A, Zuanetti G. The effect of antiarrhythmic drugs on life-threatening arrhythmias induced by the interaction between acute myocardial ischemia and sympathetic hyperactivity. Am Heart J. 1985;109:937-948. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Patterson E, Eller B, Abrams GD, Vasiliades J, Lucchesi BR. Ventricular fibrillation in a conscious canine preparation of sudden coronary death: prevention by short- and long-term amiodarone administration. Circulation. 1983;68:857-864. [Free Full Text]

17. Winslow E, Campbell JK, Barron E. Effects of amiodarone on cardiac electrophysiology and inducibility of arrhythmias in chronically infarcted dogs: late arrhythmias, haemodynamics, and sympatholytic actions. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16:896-904. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Nattel S, Davies M, Quantz M. The antiarrhythmic efficacy of amiodarone and desethylamiodarone, alone and in combination, in dogs with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1988;77:200-208. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Russo AM, Beauregard LM, Maxman HL. Oral amiodarone loading for the rapid treatment of frequent, refractory, sustained ventricular arrhythmias associated with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:1395-1399. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Mostow ND, Vrobel TR, Noon D, Rakita L. Rapid suppression of complex ventricular arrhythmias with high-dose oral amiodarone. Circulation. 1986;73:1231-1238. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Kalbfleisch SJ, Williamson B, Man KC, Vorperian V, Hummel JD, Hasse C, Strickberger SA, Calkins H, Langberg JJ, Morady F. Prospective, randomized comparison of conventional and high dose loading regimens of amiodarone in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1723-1729. [Abstract]

22. Gottlieb SS, Riggio DW, Lauria S, Peters RW, Shorofsky SR, Cines M, Froman D, Gold MR. High dose oral amiodarone loading exerts important hemodynamic actions in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:560-564. [Abstract]

23. Singh BN, Venkatech N, Nademanee K, Josephson MA, Kannan R. The historical development, cellular electrophysiology and pharmacology of amiodarone. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1989;4:249-280.

24. Shelson RS, Hill RJ, Cannon NJ, Duff HJ. Amiodarone: biochemical evidence for binding to a receptor for class I drugs associated with the rat cardiac sodium channel. Circ Res. 1989;65:477-482. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Nattel S, Talajic M, Quantz M, DeRoode M. Frequency-dependent effects of amiodarone on AV nodal function and slow channel action potentials: evidence for calcium channel blocking activity. Circulation. 1987;76:442-449. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Wagner JA, Weisman HF, Levine JH, Snowman AM, Snyder SH. Differential effects of amiodarone and desethylamiodarone on calcium antagonist receptors. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;15:501-507. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Bacq ZM, Blakeley GH, Summers RJ. The effects of amiodarone, an {alpha} and ß receptor antagonist, on adrenergic transmission in the cat spleen. Biochem Pharmacol. 1976;25:1195-1199. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Nokin P, Clinet M, Schoenfeld P. Cardiac ß-adrenoceptor modulation by amiodarone. Biochem Pharmacol. 1983;32:2473-2477. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Meridith IT, Broughton A, Jennings GL, Esler MD. Evidence of a selective increase in cardiac sympathetic activity in patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:618-624. [Abstract]

30. Floras JS. Clinical aspects of sympathetic activation and parasympathetic withdrawal in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(suppl A):72A-84A.

31. Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, Collins R, Sleight P. Beta-blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985;77:335-350.

32. Du X-J, Dart AM, Riemersma RA, Oliver MF. Failure of the cholinergic modulation of norepinephrine release during acute myocardial ischemia in the rat. Circ Res. 1990;66:950-956. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Medvedev OS, Esler MD, Angus JA, Cocks HS, Eisenhofer G. Simultaneous determination of plasma norepinephrine and adrenaline kinetics. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1990;341:192-199. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Venkatesh N, Padbury JF, Singh BN. Effects of amiodarone and desethylamiodarone on rabbit myocardial ß-adrenoceptors and serum thyroid hormones: absence of relationship to serum and myocardial drug concentrations. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8:989-997. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Stitzel R. The biological fate of reserpine. Pharmacol Rev. 1977;28:179-205. [Abstract]

36. Rand MJ, Jurevics H. The pharmacology of rauwolfia alkaloids. In: Gross F, ed. Antihypertensive Agents. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1977:77-159.

37. Trendelenburg U, Bönisch H, Graefe KH, Henseling M. The rate constants for the efflux of metabolites of catecholamines and phenethylamines. Pharmacol Rev. 1980;31:179-203. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Kopin IJ. Catecholamine metabolism: basic aspects and clinical significance. Pharmacol Rev. 1985;37:333-364. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Ropchak TG, Kopin IJ. Source and physiological significance of plasma 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol in the rat. J Neurochem. 1988;51:1204-1213. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Wyss PA, Moor MJ, Bickel MH. Single-dose kinetics of tissue distribution, excretion and metabolism of amiodarone in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990;254:502-507. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Weir SJ, Ueda CT. Amiodarone pharmacokinetics, I: Acute dose-dependent disposition studies in rats. J Pharmacokinet Biopharmacol. 1986;14:601-613. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Riva E, Gerna M, Neyroz P, Urso R, Bartosek I, Guaitani A. Pharmacokinetics of amiodarone in rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1982;4:270-275. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Latini R, Connolly SJ, Kates RE. Myocardial disposition of amiodarone in the dog. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1983;224:603-608. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Talajic M, DeRoode MR, Nattel S. Comparative electrophysiologic effects of intravenous amiodarone and desethylamiodarone in dogs: evidence for clinically relevant activity of the metabolite. Circulation. 1987;75:265-271. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Johnson RG, Neers MF, Scarpa A. H+ ATPase of chromaffin granules: kinetics, regulation, and stoichiometry. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:10701-10707. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Phillips JH. Dynamic aspects of chromaffin granule structure. Neuroscience. 1982;7:1595-1609. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

47. Kopin IJ, Gordon EK. Metabolism of norepinephrine-H3 released by tyramine and reserpine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1962; 138:351-359.

48. Eisenhofer G, Ropchak TG, Kopin IJ, Goldstein DS. Release, metabolism and intraneuronal disposition of exogenous, endogenous and newly synthesized norepinephrine in the rat vas deferens. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988;245:81-88. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Lamontagne D, Yamaguchi N, Lambert C, de Champlain J, Nadeau R. Absence of prejunctional sympathetic effect of amiodarone in hearts of open-chest anaesthetized dogs. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1990;68:144-149. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

50. Latini R, Bizzi A, Cini M, Veneroni E, Marchi S, Riva E. Amiodarone and desethylamiodarone tissue uptake in rats chronically treated with amiodarone is non-linear with the dose. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1987;39:426-431. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

51. Kato R, Venkatesh N, Kamiya K, Yabek S, Kannan R, Singh BN. Electrophysiologic effects of desethylamiodarone, an active metabolite of amiodarone: comparison with amiodarone during chronic administration in rabbits. Am Heart J. 1988;115:351-359. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

52. Ikeda N, Nademanee K, Kannan R, Singh BN. Electrophysiologic effects of amiodarone: experimental and clinical observation relative to serum and tissue concentrations. Am Heart J. 1984;108:890-898. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

53. Giardina EV, Schneider M, Barr ML. Myocardial amiodarone and desethylamiodarone concentrations in patients undergoing cardiac transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:943-947. [Abstract]

54. Kaye DM, Lambert GW, Lefkovits J, Morris M, Jennings G, Esler MD. Neurochemical evidence of cardiac sympathetic activation and increased central nervous system norepinephrine turnover in severe congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:570-578. [Abstract]

55. Wellens HJJ, Brugada P, Abdollah H, Dassen WR. A comparison of the electrophysiologic effects of intravenous and oral amiodarone in the same patients. Circulation. 1984;69:120-124. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

56. Ohta M, Karagueuzian HS, Mandel WJ, Peter T. Acute and chronic effects of amiodarone on delayed afterdepolarization and triggered automaticity in rabbit ventricular myocardium. Am Heart J. 1987;113:289-296. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

57. Morady F, Lorenzo LA, Krol RB, Baerman JM, de Buitleir M. Acute and chronic effects of amiodarone on ventricular refractoriness, intraventricular conduction and ventricular tachycardia induction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:148-157. [Abstract]

58. Yabek SM, Kato R, Singh BN. Effects of amiodarone and its metabolite, desethylamiodarone, on the electrophysiologic properties of isolated cardiac muscle. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8:197-207. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

59. Kadish AH, Chen R-F, Schmaltz S, Morady F. Magnitude and time course of beta-adrenergic antagonism during oral amiodarone therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:1240-1245. [Abstract]

60. Gallagher JD, Bianchi J, Gessman LJ. A comparison of the electrophysiologic effects of acute and chronic amiodarone administration on canine Purkinje fibers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989;13:723-729. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

61. Kosinski EJ, Albin JB, Young E, Lewis SM, LeLand S Jr. Hemodynamic effects of intravenous amiodarone. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;4:565-570.[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. A. Hunt, W. T. Abraham, M. H. Chin, A. M. Feldman, G. S. Francis, T. G. Ganiats, M. Jessup, M. A. Konstam, D. M. Mancini, K. Michl, et al.
2009 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 14, 2009; 53(15): e1 - e90.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Jessup, W. T. Abraham, D. E. Casey, A. M. Feldman, G. S. Francis, T. G. Ganiats, M. A. Konstam, D. M. Mancini, P. S. Rahko, M. A. Silver, et al.
2009 Focused Update: ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 14, 2009; 53(15): 1343 - 1382.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
2009 WRITING GROUP TO REVIEW NEW EVIDENCE AND UPDA, M. Jessup, W. T. Abraham, D. E. Casey, A. M. Feldman, G. S. Francis, T. G. Ganiats, M. A. Konstam, D. M. Mancini, P. S. Rahko, et al.
2009 Focused Update: ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation
Circulation, April 14, 2009; 119(14): 1977 - 2016.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
2005 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, S. A. Hunt, W. T. Abraham, M. H. Chin, A. M. Feldman, G. S. Francis, T. G. Ganiats, M. Jessup, M. A. Konstam, D. M. Mancini, et al.
2009 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: Developed in Collaboration With the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation
Circulation, April 14, 2009; 119(14): e391 - e479.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Tachikawa, M. Kodama, K. Watanabe, T. Takahashi, M. Ma, T. Kashimura, M. Ito, S. Hirono, Y. Okura, K. Kato, et al.
Amiodarone Improves Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Function to Hold Norepinephrine in the Heart, Prevents Left Ventricular Remodeling, and Improves Cardiac Function in Rat Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, February 22, 2005; 111(7): 894 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Datta, T. Waghray, M. Torres, and S. Glusman
Amiodarone Decreases Heat, Cold, and Mechanical Hyperalgesia in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 178 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
V. J. Dias Da Silva, T. Gnecchi-Ruscone, B. Lavelli, V. Bellina, D. Manzella, A. Porta, A. Malliani, and N. Montano
Opposite effects of iv amiodarone on cardiovascular vagal and sympathetic efferent activities in rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): R543 - R548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
V. J. Dias da Silva, P. C. Cavalcante Viana, R. de Melo Alves, H. C. Salgado, N. Montano, and R. Fazan Jr
Antihypertensive Action of Amiodarone in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 597 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
E. BERTAGLIA, D. D'ESTE, A. ZANOCCO, F. ZERBO, and P. PASCOTTO
Effects of pretreatment with verapamil on early recurrences after electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomised study
Heart, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 578 - 580.
[Full Text]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Kulakowski, S. Karczmarewicz, G. Karpinski, M. Soszynska, and L. CeremuzYnski
Effects of intravenous amiodarone on ventricular refractoriness, intraventricular conduction, and ventricular tachycardia induction
Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(3): 207 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. M. Kaye, A. M. Dart, G. L. Jennings, and M. D. Esler
Antiadrenergic effect of chronic amiodarone therapy in human heart failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1553 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
D. Haikerwal, A. M. Dart, P. J. Little, and D. M. Kaye
Identification of a Novel, Inhibitory Action of Amiodarone on Vesicular Monoamine Transport
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 1999; 288(2): 834 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du, X.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Dart, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Du, X.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Dart, A. M.