Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;91:298-303

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grines, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Califf, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grines, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Califf, R. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack
*Smoking
*Smoking and Youth

(Circulation. 1995;91:298-303.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Effect of Cigarette Smoking on Outcome After Thrombolytic Therapy for Myocardial Infarction

Cindy L. Grines, MD; Eric J. Topol, MD; William W. O'Neill, MD; Barry S. George, MD; Dean Kereiakes, MD; Harry R. Phillips, MD; Jeffrey D. Leimberger, PhD; Lynn H. Woodlief, MS; Robert M. Califf, MD

From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mich.

Correspondence to Cindy L. Grines, MD, Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W Thirteen Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background Smoking is known to be a strong risk factor for premature atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death. Unexpectedly, in the reperfusion era, investigators have reported that patients who smoke have a more favorable prognosis after thrombolysis compared with nonsmokers. Since smoking is associated with a relatively hypercoagulable state, we hypothesized that the coronary occlusion responsible for infarction may be primarily thrombotic, with improved outcome relating to enhanced patency or the absence of a residual stenosis after thrombolytic therapy.

Methods and Results To examine this issue, we evaluated 1619 patients treated with TPA, urokinase, or both in six consecutive myocardial infarction trials, of whom 878 (54%) were currently smoking. Patients underwent 90-minute and predischarge catheterizations, which were quantified blinded to the patients' smoking status. As expected, baseline fibrinogen (2.8 [2.5, 3.6] versus 2.7 [2.4, 3.5] g/dL, P=.003) and hematocrit (44% [41%, 47%] versus 43% [40%, 45%], P=.0001) levels were greater in smokers. Although there were no differences between smokers and nonsmokers with regard to 90-minute patency (73% versus 74%), smokers were more likely to have TIMI-3 flow (41.1% versus 34.6%, P=.034), with a larger minimum lumen diameter of the infarct stenosis both acutely (0.82 [0.51, 1.11] versus 0.72 [0.43, 1.04] mm, P=.0432) and at follow-up (1.2 [0.8, 1.74] versus 1.0 [0.7, 1.5], P=.002). Although smokers tended to have reduced in-hospital mortality compared with nonsmokers in univariate analysis (4.0% versus 8.9%, P=.0001), after adjustment for baseline differences between smokers and nonsmokers in age (54 [47, 62] versus 60 [54, 68] years, P<.0001), inferior infarct location (60% versus 53%, P<.0001), three-vessel disease (16% versus 22%, P<.001), and baseline ejection fraction (53% [44%, 60%] versus 50% [42%, 58%], P=.0069), smoking history was of no independent prognostic significance.

Conclusions Therefore, smokers have a relatively hypercoagulable state, documented by increased hematocrit and fibrinogen levels. Quantitative coronary angiographic analysis suggests that the mechanism of infarction in smokers is more often thrombosis of a less critical atherosclerotic lesion compared with nonsmokers. Enhanced perfusion status, as well as favorable baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, may be responsible for the more benign prognosis of current smokers.


Key Words: myocardial infarction • thrombolysis • smoking


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cigarette smoking has a number of adverse effects on the cardiovascular system. Hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke can injure arterial endothelium, initiate the atherosclerotic process, decrease levels of high-density lipoproteins, and have a dose-dependent effect on plaque deposition.1 2 Studies in both humans and animals have demonstrated that exposure to tobacco smoke increases fibrinogen levels and aggregation of platelets.3 4 In addition to its effect on platelets, nicotine stimulates catecholamine release, increasing heart rate and blood pressure5 and causing coronary vasoconstriction.6 7 8 Increased levels of carbon monoxide further reduce myocardial oxygen delivery.9 Thus, a number of mechanisms may accelerate coronary artery disease and precipitate myocardial infarction (MI) in smokers.

Epidemiological data have consistently shown that the risk of MI increases progressively with the number of cigarettes smoked per day.10 Studies have demonstrated that the risk of fatal and nonfatal MI is about two to three times higher in smokers than in nonsmokers, and the risk of sudden cardiac death may be 10 times higher.11 Furthermore, continued smoking after MI may double the rate of reinfarction and subsequent death.12

Paradoxically, recent thrombolytic trials have reported that MI patients with a history of current smoking had a favorable prognosis compared with nonsmokers.13 14 15 Since smoking has been associated with a hypercoagulable state, we postulated that the coronary occlusion may be primarily thrombotic, with improved outcome relating to enhanced patency or the presence of a less severe residual stenosis after thrombolytic therapy. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the effect of current cigarette smoking on outcome after thrombolytic therapy for acute MI in a large patient population in whom extensive clinical and angiographic data were prospectively collected.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Study Population
The study population consisted of 1619 patients enrolled in six consecutive MI trials.16 17 18 19 20 21 Enrollment criteria for these trials were similar and included patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years with chest discomfort less than 6 hours in duration whose ECGs demonstrated ST elevation of at least 1 mm in two contiguous leads. Patients were excluded if they developed cardiogenic shock before enrollment or if they had contraindications for thrombolytics.

Thrombolytic Therapy
All patients received intravenous thrombolytic therapy as soon as possible after informed consent was obtained. The first 386 patients were enrolled into the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial (TAMI-1), in which patients, after receiving tissue-type plasminogen activator (TPA), 150 mg over 6 to 8 hours, were randomized to either delayed or immediate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).16 The next 147 patients were entered into a dose-ranging pilot study (TAMI-2) that examined the efficacy of combination thrombolytic therapy with TPA (25 mg to 1 mg/kg) and urokinase (0.5 to 2 million U).17 The next trial (TAMI-3) randomized patients to early (10 000 U bolus) or late intravenous heparin after TPA therapy (1.5 mg/kg over 4 hours).18 In the urokinase patency study, 102 patients received intravenous urokinase (3 million U over 45 to 60 minutes).19 The TAMI-5 study randomized 575 patients to TPA alone (100 mg over 3 hours), urokinase alone (3 million U over 60 minutes), or combination TPA (1 mg/kg) with urokinase (1.5 million U) over 60 minutes followed by a second randomization to immediate catheterization with rescue percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or late catheterization just before hospital discharge.20 Finally, the TAMI-7 trial was a dose-ranging study investigating various accelerated dosing regimens of TPA or combined TPA with urokinase.21

Cardiac Catheterization
With the exception of patients randomized to the deferred catheterization strategy in the TAMI-5 study (n=288), all patients were referred for coronary angiography 90 minutes after initiation of thrombolytic therapy. Patency of the infarct-related vessel was determined in accordance with the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) study classification.22 PTCA of the infarct-related vessel was generally attempted in patients who failed thrombolysis (TIMI grade 0 to 1 flow) and/or in patients with ongoing ischemia with a high-grade coronary stenosis. An additional 99 patients with a patent vessel were randomized to immediate PTCA as part of the TAMI-1 study.16 Contrast left ventriculography was performed in the 30° right anterior oblique projection. Predischarge catheterization was performed in 1347 of 1518 survivors (89%).

In-Hospital Therapy
All patients were admitted to the coronary care unit and monitored for at least 24 hours. After the heparin bolus, intravenous heparin, adjusted to prolong the activated partial thromboplastin time 2 to 2.5 times control, was continued for at least 3 days. During the first 24 hours, the patients received intravenous nitroglycerin and lidocaine unless contraindicated. Patients also received one aspirin tablet (325 mg) per day and 30 to 60 mg QID diltiazem soon after hospitalization. ß-Blockers were not given unless clinically indicated, because left ventricular function was a key end point of these trials. If recurrent ischemia occurred, emergency catheterization was performed and revascularization with PTCA or coronary artery bypass grafting was considered. Repeat coronary arteriography and left ventriculography were obtained before hospital discharge. Infarct vessel reocclusion was defined as angiographically documented occlusion of a vessel (TIMI grade 0 to 1 flow) that was patent after the acute intervention. Multivessel coronary disease was defined as >50% stenosis in one or more vessels remote from the infarct artery. Left main coronary disease was considered to be at least two-vessel involvement.

Clinical Events
The following in-hospital clinical events were obtained from the clinical case report form: (1) death; (2) reinfarction diagnosed by a second elevation of cardiac enzymes; (3) reocclusion, defined angiographically; (4) recurrent ischemia, defined by >20 minutes of symptoms compatible with myocardial ischemia associated with new ST- or T-wave changes; (5) the need for coronary angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery before the planned 7-day catheterization; and (6) congestive heart failure, diagnosed by radiographic pulmonary edema, rales more than bibasilar, or requirement for inotropic support.

Angiographic Analysis
All coronary angiograms and ventriculograms were analyzed at the University of Michigan core laboratory. The perfusion status was determined visually,22 and residual coronary stenosis was quantified with a computer-assisted edge detection algorithm by a technician with no knowledge of the smoking history. End-diastolic cine frames demonstrating the infarct-related artery stenosis in its more severe projection were digitized with a cine-video converter. An automated edge detection algorithm was applied to the digitized image, and the arterial contour was determined.23 With the diagnostic coronary catheter as the reference diameter, the absolute minimal lumen diameter of a user-defined normal and a stenotic segment were determined.

The 30° right anterior oblique end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular endocardial contours from a normal sinus beat were traced by a single observer blinded to patient identity, time of study, therapy, and smoking status. Technically inadequate ventriculograms (ventricular tachycardia or substandard opacification) were excluded from analysis. Global ejection fraction was determined by the area-length method.24 Regional wall motion for the infarct and noninfarct zones was determined by the centerline chord method.25 Within each territory, regional wall motion was calculated as the mean motion of one half of the most abnormally contracting contiguous chords and expressed in SD per chord. Hypokinesis is indicated by negative values, and hyperkinesis by positive values.

Coagulation Variables
Blood samples were collected on 1.10 mol/L citrate and 200 kallicrein inhibitory units/mL aprotinin and immediately processed and kept frozen at -20°C until assayed in the core laboratory. Fibrinogen was determined by the coagulation rate assay described by Clauss.26

Statistical Analysis
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to examine differences between smokers and nonsmokers for continuous variables, which are expressed as medians with 25th and 75th percentiles. The likelihood ratio {chi}2 statistic was used to test the significance of differences between the groups for discrete variables. Since baseline demographic and angiographic variables differed between smokers and nonsmokers, we adjusted for other factors known to be related to risk of mortality in this population.27 These factors included age, infarct location, systolic blood pressure, ejection fraction, number of diseased vessels, and TIMI flow grade at 90 minutes after presentation. Current smoking history was added to these variables in a logistic regression model to determine whether it independently contributed to the prediction of in-hospital mortality.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Baseline Characteristics
Over a 6-year period (1986 to 1991), 1619 patients were enrolled in six thrombolytic protocols,16 17 18 19 20 21 with prospective collection of clinical and angiographic data. Of these patients, 878 (54%) were current smokers at the time of infarction. Smokers consumed a median of 1.5 (1, 2) packs per day over 30 (25, 40) years. As demonstrated in Table 1Down, smokers were more likely to be male (80% versus 76%, P=.043) and younger (54 [47, 62] versus 62 [54, 68] years, P<.0001) and less likely to have other cardiac risk factors of hypertension, diabetes, or elevated cholesterol. Inferior infarction occurred more commonly in smokers than nonsmokers (60% versus 53%, P<.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Data

As expected, smokers had a relatively hypercoagulable state, as assessed by increased hematocrit (44% [41%, 47%]; range, 30% to 78% versus 43% [40%, 45%]; range, 30% to 54%; P=.0001), fibrinogen levels (2.8 [2.5, 3.6] versus 2.7 [2.4, 3.5] g/dl, P=.0029), and platelet counts (277 [230, 323] versus 266 [222, 312]), compared with nonsmokers (Table 1Up).

Angiographic Findings
Acute patency after thrombolytics did not differ between smokers and nonsmokers (73.0% versus 73.9%) (Table 2Down). However, smokers appeared to have more complete reperfusion, as assessed by a greater proportion of vessels with TIMI-3 flow (41.1% versus 34.6%, P=.034). A larger minimum luminal diameter of the stenosis was observed (0.82 [0.51, 1.11] versus 0.72 [0.43, 1.04] mm), P=.0432) during the acute catheterization; however, because of differences in the reference segment, percent diameter stenosis was similar in the two groups (76% [66%, 84%] versus 74% [65%, 84%]). Acute PTCA of the infarct vessel was performed in 29% of smokers and 27% of nonsmokers (P=.333). Reocclusion rates were similar between smokers and nonsmokers in the overall series (10.3% versus 11.0%, P=.729) as well as in the subgroup of patients in whom acute PTCA was not performed (7.3% versus 9.3%, P=.32). However, predischarge catheterization continued to show less residual stenosis in smokers, as assessed by minimal lumen diameter (1.2 [0.8, 1.74] versus 1.0 [0.7, 1.5] mm, P=.0013) and percent residual stenosis (62% [44%, 74%] versus 66% [49%, 77%]), P=.04). Moreover, smokers had less extensive coronary disease, as assessed by the larger diameter of the "normal reference segment" of the infarct vessel at 3.08 (2.7, 3.61) versus 3.01 (2.6, 3.5) mm, P=.02, and the reduced incidence of three-vessel disease (16.0% versus 21.6%, P=.0001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Angiographic Data

Left Ventricular Function
Technically adequate contrast ventriculograms were available from the acute study in 1074 patients and follow-up in 1176 patients. As demonstrated in Table 3Down, at acute catheterization, smokers had better infarct zone function (-2.72 versus -2.87 SD/chord, P=.0205) and non–infarct zone function (0.37 versus 0.11 SD/chord, P=.0232), which contributed to a slightly higher ejection fraction (53% versus 50%, P=.0069). However, by the time of hospital discharge, there were no differences in regional or global ventricular function between the two groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Left Ventricular Function

Clinical Outcome
In-hospital clinical events are outlined in Table 4Down. Recurrent unstable ischemia occurred less frequently in smokers compared with nonsmokers (17.6% versus 23%, P=.007), as did in-hospital death (4% versus 8.8%, P=.0001) and stroke (1.5% versus 3.2%, P=.18). Urgent revascularization procedures were performed slightly less frequently in smokers (emergency angioplasty, 8.0% versus 10.4%; emergency bypass surgery, 3.7% versus 4.9%; and urgent bypass surgery, 4.7% versus 5.5%), but these differences were not statistically significant. However, when taken together, urgent revascularization was required in 15.0% of smokers compared with 19.8% of nonsmokers, P=.011. The less complicated course resulted in a shorter length of hospital stay in smokers compared with nonsmokers (9 versus 10 days, P=.0018).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Clinical Outcome

A previously established multiple logistic regression model predicting in-hospital mortality in MI patients was used to determine whether current smoking was related to a favorable prognosis. After adjustment for clinical variables of age, systolic blood pressure, and infarct location, current smokers appeared to have a prognostic advantage ({chi}2=3.8, P=.05). However, when acute catheterization variables were added to the model (number of diseased vessels, ejection fraction, and TIMI flow grade), a history of current smoking did not significantly add to or decrease the odds of death ({chi}2=0.97, P=.3247).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The purpose of this study was to determine the relation of current smoking to angiographic variables and clinical outcome after MI in a large population in whom data were prospectively collected. Current smokers were found to be younger, to have fewer cardiac risk factors, to be more likely to sustain an inferior MI, and to have less extensive coronary disease and better perfusion status after thrombolysis and improved clinical outcome compared with nonsmokers. All of these differences may have contributed to lower in-hospital mortality.

Mechanisms
A lower frequency of multivessel disease and a larger lumen diameter of "normal" and stenotic segments suggest that smokers with acute MI have less extensive atherosclerotic disease. Initially, this observation may seem to contradict the well-known data that smoking promotes atherosclerosis. The lack of extensive coronary disease may be explained by the younger age of this population, as well as a lower prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Elevated hematocrit, fibrinogen, and platelet levels suggest that smokers may have a hypercoagulable state promoting coronary thrombosis. Thus, these findings demonstrate that in patients who smoke, thrombosis occurs at an earlier stage of the atherosclerotic process, with a lesser influence of other risk factors. After medical therapies, including thrombolysis, heparin, and nitrates, smokers had enhanced perfusion of the infarct vessel and better acute infarct zone function, despite similar delays in initiation of therapy. This suggests that smokers may have spontaneously reperfused (endogenous thrombolysis) or experienced a more efficient response to exogenous thrombolytic drugs. Alternatively, acute coronary vasospasm may be important in the pathogenesis of MI. Clinical studies have demonstrated that cigarette smoking constricts both epicardial coronary arteries and myocardial resistance vessels28 29 and thus may contribute to infarction. In fact, independent of the severity of residual stenosis and exercise test results, continued smoking has been shown to be predictive of reinfarction.30 31

Clinical Outcomes
Current smokers had fewer episodes of recurrent ischemia and better in-hospital survival compared with nonsmokers. However, the more benign prognosis of smokers was easily explained by favorable baseline demographic and angiographic variables. Numerous studies32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 have demonstrated that prognosis after MI is directly related to age, factors reflecting infarct size (infarct location, ejection fraction), extent of coronary disease, infarct artery perfusion (TIMI flow grade), and propensity for diffuse atherosclerosis (diabetes), all of which favored smokers in this study. In short, smoking appears to contribute to earlier infarctions in otherwise healthier patients who are likely to survive.

The lower rates of recurrent ischemia may be related to less residual stenosis of the infarct vessel or less ischemia from multivessel disease. However, despite less residual stenosis and enhanced perfusion of the infarct vessel, smokers had reocclusion rates similar to those of nonsmokers. This may be explained by the increased frequency of inferior infarction with an increased risk of reocclusion of the right coronary artery.40 Alternatively, if smokers have a greater component of coronary vasospasm, recurrent ischemia may have been more effectively controlled by the protocol administration of nitrates and calcium channel blockers.

Lack of association of current smoking with prognosis in the present study is somewhat discrepant with the TIMI-2B trial. This may relate to the use of acute catheterization variables in our statistical model that were not available in the TIMI-2B trial. A larger sample of patients may have further advanced our understanding of the independent risk (or decrease of risk) attributed to smoking.

Limitations
This study used pooled data from six thrombolytic trials. In general, acute catheterization was performed, with rescue PTCA reserved for patients who failed thrombolysis. However, two of the trials used slightly different invasive stratifiers. Thus, 99 patients from the TAMI-1 trial underwent acute catheterization with immediate PTCA of a patent vessel, and 288 patients from the TAMI-5 study were randomized to late catheterization with acute interventions performed only for clinical indications. Although these patients were excluded from acute patency and reocclusion analyses, it is possible that different treatment strategies may have affected the results.

Conclusions
These data demonstrate that smokers have a relatively hypercoagulable state and that the mechanism of infarction may be spasm or thrombosis of a less critical atherosclerotic lesion compared with nonsmokers. The more benign prognosis in smokers is a result of favorable baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics and younger age. After adjustment for these differences, a history of current smoking did not significantly add to or decrease the risk of death.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The authors wish to thank Judy Snyder Wettstein and Phyllis McKinney for manuscript preparation.

Received April 28, 1994; accepted August 7, 1994.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Penn A, Batastini G, Soloman J, Burns F, Albert R. Dose dependent size increases of aortic lesions following chance exposure to 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene. Cancer Res. 1981;41:588-592. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Garrison RJ, Kannel WB, Feinlieb M, Castelli WP, McNamara PM. Cigarette smoking and HDL cholesterol: the Framingham offspring study. Atherosclerosis. 1978;30:17-25. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Fitzgerald GA, Oates JA, Nowak J. Cigarette smoking and hemostatic function. Am Heart J. 1988;115:267-271. Review article. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Fuster V, Chesebro JH, Frye RL, Elveback LR. Platelet survival and the development of coronary artery disease in the young adult: effect of cigarette smoking, strong family history and medical therapy. Circulation. 1981;63:546-551. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Tachmes L, Fernandez RJ, Sackner MA. Hemodynamic effects of smoking cigarettes of high and low nicotine content. Chest. 1978;74:243-245. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Maouad J, Fernandez F, Barrillon A, Gerbaux A, Gay J. Diffuse or segmental narrowing (spasm) of the coronary arteries during smoking demonstrated on angiography. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:354-355. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Martin JL, Wilson JR, Ferraro N, Laskey WK, Kleaveland JP, Hirshfeld JW Jr. Acute coronary vasoconstrictive effects of cigarette smoking in coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:56-60. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Nicod P, Winniford MD, Campbell WB, Rehr RB, Firth BG, Hillis LD. Alterations in coronary blood flow induced by cigarette smoking: lack of relation to plasma arginine vasopressin concentrations. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:667-668. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Wald N, Howard S, Smith PG, Kjeidsen K. Association between atherosclerotic disease and carboxyhaemoglobin levels in tobacco smokers. Br Med J. 1973;1:761-765.
  10. Kleinman JC, Feldman JJ, Monk MA. Trends in smoking and ischemic heart disease mortality: recent trends of major coronary risk factors and CHD mortality in the USA and other industrialized countries. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare publication No. 79-1610. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; 1979.
  11. Wilhelmsen L. Coronary heart disease: epidemiology of smoking and intervention studies of smoking. Am Heart J. 1988;115:242-249. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Burling TA, Singleton EG, Bigelow GE, Baile WF, Gottlieb SH. Smoking following myocardial infarction: a critical review of the literature. Health Psychology. 1984;3:83-96. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. AIMS Trial Study Group. Effect of intravenous APSAC on mortality after acute myocardial infarction: preliminary report of a placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 1988;1:545-549. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico: GISSI-2. A factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among 12,490 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1990;336:65-71. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. The TIMI Study Group. Comparison of invasive and conservative strategies after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) phase II trial. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:618-627. [Abstract]
  16. Topol EJ, Califf RM, George BS, Kereiakes DJ, Abbottsmith CW, Candela RJ, Lee KL, Pitt B, Stack RS, O'Neill WW, the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed elective angioplasty after intravenous infarction. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:581-588. [Abstract]
  17. Topol EJ, Califf RM, George BS, Kereiakes DJ, Rothbaum D, Candela RJ, Abbottsmith CW, Pinkerton CA, Stump DC, Collen D, Lee KL, Pitt B, Kline EM, Boswick JM, O'Neill WW, Stack RS, the TAMI Study Group. Coronary arterial thrombolysis with combined infusion of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator and urokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1988;77:1100-1107. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Topol EJ, George BS, Kereiakes DJ, Stump DC, Candela RJ, Abbottsmith CW, Aronson L, Pickel A, Bowick JM, Lee KL, Ellis SG, Califf RM, the TAMI Study Group. A randomized controlled trial of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and early intravenous heparin in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1989;79:281-286. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Wall TC, Phillips HR, Stack RS, Mantell S, Aronson L, Boswick J, Sigmon K, DiMeo M, Chaplin D, Whitcomb D, Pasi D, Zawodniak M, Hajisheik M, Hegde S, Barker W, Tenney R, Califf RM. Results of high dose intravenous urokinase for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:124-131. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Califf RM, Topol EJ, Stack RS, Ellis SG, George BS, Kereiakes DJ, Samaha JK, Worley SJ, Anderson JL, Harrelson-Woodlief L, Wall TC, Phillips HR III, Abbottsmith CW, Candela RJ, Flanagan WH, Sasahara AA, Mantell SJ, Lee KL, for the TAMI Study Group. Evaluation of combination thrombolytic therapy and timing of cardiac catheterization in acute myocardial infarction: results of Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction—Phase 5 Randomized Trial. Circulation. 1991;83:1543-1556. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Wall TC, Califf RM, George BS, Ellis SG, Samaha JK, Kereiakes DJ, Worley SJ, Sigmon K, Topol EJ, for the TAMI-7 Study Group. Accelerated plasminogen activator dose regimens for coronary thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:482-489. [Abstract]
  22. The TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:932-936.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Mancini GBJ, Simon SB, McGillem MJ, LeFree MT, Friedman HZ, Vogel RA. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. Circulation. 1987;75:452-460. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Sandler H, Dodge HT. The use of single plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume in man. Am Heart J. 1968;75:325-334. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Sheehan FH, Bolgon EL, Dodge HT, Mathey DG, Schofer J, Wood HW. Advantages and applications of the centerline method for characterizing regional ventricular function. Circulation. 1986;74:293-305. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Clauss A. Gerinnungsphysiologische Schnellmethode zur Bestimmung des Fibrinogens. Acta Haematol. 1957;37:237-246.
  27. Lee KL, Sigmon KN, Califf RM, Topol EJ, and the TAMI Study Group. How much prognostic information does catheterization after thrombolytic therapy add to noninvasive clincal factors? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:80A. Abstract.
  28. Moliterno DJ, Willard JE, Lange RA, Negus BH, Boehrer JD, Glamann DB, Landau C, Rossen JD, Winniford MD, Hillis LD. Coronary-artery vasoconstriction induced by cocaine, cigarette smoking, or both. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:454-459. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Quillen JE, Rossen JD, Oskarsson HJ, Minor RL, Lopez AG, Winniford MD. Acute effect of cigarette smoking in the coronary circulation: constriction of epicardial and resistance vessels. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:642-647. [Abstract]
  30. Rivers JT, White HD, Cross DB, Williams BF, Norris RM. Reinfarction after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction followed by conservative management: incidence and effect of smoking. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:340-348. [Abstract]
  31. Wilhelmsson C, Vedin JA, Elmfeldt D, Tibblin G, Wilhelmsen L. Smoking and myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1975;1:415-420. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Taylor GJ, Humphries JO, Mellits ED, Pitt B, Schulze RA, Griffith LSC, Auchuff SC. Predictors of clinical course, coronary anatomy, and left ventricular function after recovery from acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1990;62:960-970. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Schulman SP, Auchuff SC, Griffith LSC, Humphries JO, Taylor GT, Mellits ED, Kennedy M, Baumgartner R, Weisfeldt ML, Baughman KL. Prognostic cardiac catheterization variable in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a five-year prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11:1164-1172. [Abstract]
  34. Sanz G, Castaner A, Betriu A, Magrina J, Roig E, Coll S, Pare JC, Navarro-Lopez F. Determinants of prognosis in survivors of myocardial infarction: a prospective clinical angiographic study. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:1065-1070. [Abstract]
  35. Morris KG, Palmeri ST, Califf RM, McKinnis RA, Higginbotham MB, Coleman RE, Cobb FR. Value of radionuclide angiography for predicting specific cardiac events after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:318-324. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Borer JS, Rosing DR, Miller RH, Stark RM, Kent KM, Bacharach SL, Green MV, Lake CR, Cohen H, Holmes D, Donohue D, Baker W, Epstein SE. Natural history of left ventricular function during one year after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with clinical, electrocardiographic, and biochemical determinations. Am J Cardiol. 1980;46:1-12. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Muller DWM, Topol EJ, Ellis SG, Sigmon KN, Lee K, Califf RM, and the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) Study Group. Ann Arbor, Mich. and Durham, N.C. Multivessel coronary artery disease: a key predictor of short-term prognosis after reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1991;121:1042-1049. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. The GUSTO Angiographic Investigators. The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary-artery patency, ventricular function, and survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1615-1622. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Mark DB, Sigmon K, Topol EJ, Kereiakes DJ, Pryor DB, Candela RJ, Califf RM. Identification of acute myocardial infarction patients suitable for early hospital discharge after aggressive interventional therapy: results from the thrombolysis and angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction registry. Circulation. 1991;83:1186-1193. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Bates ER, Califf RM, Stack RS, Aronson L, George B, Candela R, Kereiakes D, Abbottsmith C, Anderson L, Pitt B, O'Neill W, Topol E, and the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI-1) Trial: influence of infarct location on arterial patency, left ventricular function and mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:12-18.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
A Rosengren, L Wallentin, M Simoons, A K Gitt, S Behar, A Battler, and D Hasdai
Cardiovascular risk factors and clinical presentation in acute coronary syndromes
Heart, September 1, 2005; 91(9): 1141 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
K. E. Freedland, R. M. Carney, and J. A. Skala
Depression and Smoking in Coronary Heart Disease
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2005; 67(Supplement_1): S42 - S46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
J. A. Papadakis, D. P. Mikhailidis, G. E. Vrentzos, A. Kalikaki, I. Kazakou, and E. S. Ganotakis
Effect of Antihypertensive Treatment on PlasmaFibrinogen and Serum HDL Levelsin Patients with Essential Hypertension
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2005; 11(2): 139 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. J. Kirtane, P. Martinezclark, A. M. Rahman, K. K. Ray, D. Karmpaliotis, S. A. Murphy, R. P. Giugliano, C. P. Cannon, E. M. Antman, M. T. Roe, et al.
Association of smoking with improved myocardial perfusion and the angiographic characterization of myocardial tissue perfusion after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 18, 2005; 45(2): 321 - 323.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. Marin, R. Gonzalez-Conejero, K. W. Lee, J. Corral, V. Roldan, F. Lopez, F. Sogorb, J. Caturla, G. Y.H. Lip, and V. Vicente
A pharmacogenetic effect of factor XIII valine 34 leucine polymorphism on fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 4, 2005; 45(1): 25 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. F. J. Ng
Changes in ThrombelastographTM Variables Associated with Aging
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2004; 99(2): 449 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Ruiz-Bailen, E. A. de Hoyos, A. Reina-Toral, J. M. Torres-Ruiz, M. Alvarez-Bueno, and F. J. Gomez Jimenez
Paradoxical Effect of Smoking in the Spanish Population With Acute Myocardial Infarction or Unstable Angina: Results of the ARIAM Register
Chest, March 1, 2004; 125(3): 831 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. D. Waters, G. G. Schwartz, A. G. Olsson, A. Zeiher, M. F. Oliver, P. Ganz, M. Ezekowitz, B. R. Chaitman, S. J. Leslie, T. Stern, et al.
Effects of Atorvastatin on Stroke in Patients With Unstable Angina or Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction: A Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) Substudy
Circulation, September 24, 2002; 106(13): 1690 - 1695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. D. Rea, S. R. Heckbert, R. C. Kaplan, N. L. Smith, R. N. Lemaitre, and B. M. Psaty
Smoking Status and Risk for Recurrent Coronary Events after Myocardial Infarction
Ann Intern Med, September 17, 2002; 137(6): 494 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. K. Andrikopoulos, E. T. Chimonas, P. K. Toutouzas, D. J. Cohen, M. Doucet, D. E. Cutlip, K. K.L. Ho, J. J. Popma, and R. E. Kuntz
Paradoxical Clinical Value of Another Smoker's Paradox Response
Circulation, February 26, 2002; 105 (8): e55 - e55.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G.K Andrikopoulos, D.J Richter, P.E Dilaveris, A Pipilis, A Zaharoulis, J.E Gialafos, P.K Toutouzas, and E.T Chimonas
In-hospital mortality of habitual cigarette smokers after acute myocardial infarction. The 'smoker's paradox' in a countrywide study
Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2001; 22(9): 776 - 784.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S Kennon, K Barakat, A Suliman, P K MacCallum, K Ranjadayalan, P Wilkinson, and A D Timmis
Influence of previous aspirin treatment and smoking on the electrocardiographic manifestations of injury in acute myocardial infarction
Heart, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 41 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R Schroder, U Zeymer, K Wegscheider, and K.L Neuhaus
Comparison of the predictive value of ST segment elevation resolution at 90 and 180min after start of streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. A substudy of the Hirudin for Improvement of Thrombolysis (HIT)-4 Study
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 1999; 20(21): 1563 - 1571.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
D.E. Newby, N.A. Boon, I. Purcell, and M. Farrer
Lower cardiac mortality in smokers following thrombolysis
QJM, November 1, 1999; 92(11): 679 - 681.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Schmermund, A. E. Denktas, J. A. Rumberger, T. F. Christian, P. F. Sheedy II, K. R. Bailey, and R. S. Schwartz
Independent and incremental value of coronary artery calcium for predicting the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: Comparison with cardiac risk factors and radionuclide perfusion imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 777 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
I.F. Purcell, N. Newall, and M. Farrer
Lower cardiac mortality in smokers following thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction may be related to more effective fibrinolysis
QJM, June 1, 1999; 92(6): 327 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
I. Njolstad and E. Arnesen
Preinfarction Blood Pressure and Smoking Are Determinants for a Fatal Outcome of Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Analysis From the Finnmark Study
Arch Intern Med, June 22, 1998; 158(12): 1326 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. Hasdai, K. N. Garratt, D. E. Grill, A. Lerman, and D. R. Holmes
Effect of Smoking Status on the Long-Term Outcome after Successful Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization
N. Engl. J. Med., March 13, 1997; 336(11): 755 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. Falk, P. K. Shah, and V. Fuster
Coronary Plaque Disruption
Circulation, August 1, 1995; 92(3): 657 - 671.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grines, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Califf, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grines, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Califf, R. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack
*