| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2009;120:376-383.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Coronary Heart Disease |
From the Tokyo Study Group on Myocardial Bridge, which consisted of the departments of pathology at Toho University School of Medicine (Y.I., Y.A., K.I., T.I.), Tokyo, Japan; St Lukes International Hospital (K. Suzuki, M.F., T.O.), Tokyo, Japan; Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital (K. Yamazaki), Tokyo, Japan; the National Hospital Organization Yokohama Medical Center (H.N.), Yokohama, Japan; Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital (M.T.), Tokyo, Japan; Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital (K.O.), Tachikawa, Japan; Kitasato Institute Hospital (S.M.), Tokyo, Japan; Toda Chuo General Hospital (Y.E.), Toda, Japan; Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital (Y.K.), Tokyo, Japan; Kawasaki Municipal Kawasaki Hospital (H. Sugiura), Kawasaki, Japan; Kasukabe Municipal Hospital (T.T.), Kasukabe, Japan; Jiseikai Hospital (A.K.), Tokyo, Japan; Kawasaki Municipal Ida Hospital (T.S.), Kawasaki, Japan; Musashino Red Cross Hospital (K.T.), Musashino, Japan; Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital (H. Satoh), Kawaguchi, Japan; National Disaster Medical Hospital (K. Yamada), Tachikawa, Japan; Yokosuka Municipal Uwamachi Hospital (M.Y.-I.), Yokosuka, Japan; and Saiseikai Yokohama East Hospital (R.S.), Yokohama, Japan; the Department of Gross Anatomy, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Kagoshima University (K. Shimada), Kagoshima, Japan; and the Department of Medical Informatics, Toho University School of Medicine (C.N.), Tokyo, Japan.
Correspondence to Yukio Ishikawa, MD, Department of Pathology, Toho University School of Medicine, 5-21-16 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan. E-mail yukio{at}med.toho-u.ac.jp
Received September 10, 2008; accepted May 20, 2009.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results— One hundred consecutive autopsied MI hearts either with MBs [MI(+)MB(+) group; n=46] or without MBs (n=54) were obtained, as were 200 normal hearts, 100 with MBs [MI(–)MB(+) group] and 100 without MBs. By microscopy on LADs that were consecutively cross-sectioned at 5-mm intervals, the extent and distribution of LAD atherosclerosis were investigated histomorphometrically in conjunction with the anatomic properties of the MB, such as its thickness, length, and location and the MB muscle index (MB thickness multiplied by MB length), according to MI and MB status. In the MI(+)MB(+) group, the MB showed a significantly greater thickness and greater MB muscle index (P<0.05) than in the MI(–)MB(+) group. The intima-media ratio (intimal area/medial area) within 1.0 cm of the left coronary ostium was also greater (P<0.05) in the MI(+)MB(+) group than in the other groups. In addition, in the MI(+)MB(+) group, the location of the segment that exhibited the greatest intima-media ratio in the LAD proximal to the MB correlated significantly (P<0.001) with the location of the MB entrance, and furthermore, atherosclerosis progression in the LAD proximal to the MB was largest at 2.0 cm from the MB entrance.
Conclusions— In the proximal LAD with an MB, MB muscle index is associated with a shift of coronary disease more proximally, an effect that may increase the risk of MI.
Key Words: myocardium myocardial infarction anatomy atherosclerosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Editorial see p 357
Clinical Perspective on p 383
The clinical outcome of patients with MBs has been considered benign4; however, the significance of an MB to myocardial ischemia remains controversial. By multidetector CT imaging, symptomatic MB cases, mainly resulting from myocardial infarction (MI) without coronary atherosclerosis, have been reported.9,10 In most of these cases, the bridged LAD showed no fixed intimal lesion but demonstrated vigorous compression by MB contraction during systole.4 Such symptomatic MBs are located more proximally in the LAD and tend to be longer and/or thicker.2 In normal hearts, the anatomic properties of an MB, such as its location, length, and thickness, modulate atherosclerosis in the LAD.11 Furthermore, the LAD segment proximal to the MB usually exhibits eccentric11 and severe atherosclerotic lesions.2 By intracoronary ultrasound imaging, these relationships between the presence of an MB and the characteristics of atherosclerotic evolution in the LAD segment proximal to the MB may signify the occurrence of MI.5 However, it is still not clear how the anatomic properties of the MB relate to the occurrence of MI with spontaneous atherosclerosis progression in the LAD. In the present study, we attempted to explore the effect of an MB on MI occurrence from the viewpoint of anatomic properties of the MB in the LAD by comprehensive histomorphometry of 100 consecutive autopsied MI hearts and 200 normal control hearts with or without MB.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
As an age- and sex-matched control group that corresponded to each of the 100 MI hearts, 100 hearts that showed no MI and no MB in the LAD [the MI(–)MB(–) group] and 100 hearts that showed no MI with an MB in the LAD [the MI(–)MB(+) group] were extracted from autopsies at the same institutes. Causes of death of these control cases were varied, such as cancers, pneumonia, renal failure, or liver failure, without cardiac lesions. Full-length LADs were removed and treated by the same methods as in the MI(+) group.
The history of risk factors for MI, such as hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, was compared among the groups. The presence of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia was evaluated by the presence of a history of antihypertensive therapy or cholesterol-lowering therapy.
Written informed consent for use of the autopsied specimens in the present study was given by relatives of the patients in all cases. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Toho University School of Medicine.
Anatomic Properties of MB
In hearts with an MB, the distance from the left coronary ostium to the first MB segment was defined by 5-mm intervals as the MB location. The number of consecutive sections that included the MB multiplied by 5 mm was defined as the MB length. Thickness of the myocardium covering the LAD was measured microscopically for the entire length of the MB, and the highest value was defined as the MB thickness. Because both the length and thickness of the MB are closely related to atherosclerosis development in the LAD segment proximal to the MB,11 their synergy may generate contractile force exerted by the MB. In the present study, to assess the mass volume of the MB muscle in each case, the value of MB thickness (in micrometers) multiplied by MB length (in centimeters) was defined as the MB muscle index (MMI). In the MI(–)MB(+) group, 21 cases had multiple MBs in the LAD, as did 8 cases in the MI(+)MB(+) group, and for such cases, only the anatomic properties of the MB in the most proximal portion of the LAD were considered.
Intima-Media Ratio and Atherosclerotic Lesion
The area of the intima and media in all LAD sections was measured with a Visual 32 image-analysis system (Rise System, Sendai, Japan) to assess the extent of atherosclerosis. The area ratio of the intima to the media was defined as the intima-media ratio. By this method, the intima-media ratio was usually 0.2 to 0.8 in almost-normal LADs and <1.5 in LAD segments that had diffuse intimal thickening or mild eccentric raised lesions; however, it increased with progression of the intimal lesion or the extent of the intimal lesion. For hearts that had a stent or an aorta-LAD bypass, the calculation of intima-media ratio was abandoned; however, MB length, MB thickness, and MB location were considered for the following analyses.
Intimal lesions of each LAD section were evaluated according to the American Heart Association classification system.12 In MB(+) cases, the ratio of sections with fibroatheroma or lesions more severe than fibroatheroma in the LAD segments proximal to the MB was measured, and for MB(–) groups, the ratio of sections with fibroatheroma or lesions worse than fibroatheroma in the proximal LAD segments from the left coronary ostium to 4.5 cm (10 sections) was measured.
Statistical Analysis
Mean age and mean heart weight at autopsy were compared among the 4 groups [MI(–)MB(–),MI(–)MB(+), MI(+)MB(–), and MI(+)MB(+)] by 1-way ANOVA with Scheffé F test for multiple comparisons. Statistical comparisons of sex ratio and risk factors among the 4 groups were analyzed by
2 test, and then multiple comparison was performed with Bonferroni correction. Frequency of acute/old infarction and cause of death were compared between the MI(+)MB(–) and MI(+)MB(+) groups by
2 test.
The 3 variables of MB length, thickness, and location were normally distributed in both the MI(–)MB(+) and MI(+)MB(+) groups; their mean values were compared between groups by the Student t test. However, MMI values in the MI(–)MB(+) and MI(+)MB(+) groups did not have a normal distribution, and median values of MMI were compared by Mann–Whitney U test. Mean values of the intima-media ratio of the LAD by 5-mm intervals from the left coronary ostium to the cardiac apex were compared among the 4 groups by 1-way ANOVA with Scheffé F test. In both the MI(–)MB(+) and MI(+)MB(+) groups, the 3 mean intima-media ratios in the segments proximal to, beneath, and distal to the MB were compared by repeated-measures ANOVA with Scheffé F test. Correlation of MB location with location of the segment that exhibited the greatest intima-media ratio proximal to the MB was analyzed in both the MI(–)MB(+) and MI(+)MB(+) groups by the Pearson correlation coefficient method. To assess the evolution of atherosclerosis in the LAD proximal to the MB, the mean values of intima-media ratio by 5-mm intervals upward to the left coronary ostium from the MB entrance in the MI(+)MB(+) group were compared with those in the MI(–)MB(+) group by Student t test. In the present study, all statistical analyses were performed with the StatView program (SAS Institute, Raleigh, NC), and differences were considered significant at P<0.05.
The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ratio of acute MI to old MI cases and cause of death showed no significant difference between the 2 MI groups (Table 2). Therefore, we combined both the acute and old MI cases as an MI(+) group in the present study. The MI(+)MB(–) group included 18 cases with stenting or aorta-LAD bypass operation, and the MI(+)MB(+) group included 10 such cases.
|
Anatomic Properties of MB
All anatomic properties of MB are indicated in Table 3. MB location in the MI(–)MB(+) group was not different from that in the MI(+)MB(+) group. MB length tended to be longer in the MI(+)MB(+) group than in the MI(–)MB(+) group, but there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups. MB thickness in the MI(+)MB(+) group was significantly (P=0.0481) greater than in the MI(–)MB(+) group. MMI was significantly (P=0.0390) greater in the MI(+)MB(+) group than in the MI(–)MB(+) group.
|
Intima-Media Ratio in Non-MI Cases by MB Status
Intima-media ratio at 5-mm intervals for a distance of 10 cm from the left coronary ostium in MI(–) cases is shown in Figure 2A. In the MI(–)MB(–) group, the intima-media ratio increased up to 2 cm from the left coronary ostium and subsequently decreased. The intima-media ratio in the MI(–)MB(+) group increased up to 1 cm from the left coronary ostium, remained at a high level up to 3 cm from the ostium, and subsequently decreased, but intima-media ratios from 3.5 to 7.5 cm were significantly lower than in the MI(–)MB(–) group.
|
In the MI(–)MB(–) group, fibroatheroma and more severe lesions were found in 418 (41.8%) of 1000 sections in the proximal LAD from the ostium to 4.5 cm. In the MI(–)MB(+) group, these types of intimal lesions were recognized in 394 (43.1%) of 914 sections in LAD segments proximal to the MB.
In the MI(–)MB(+) group, the intima-media ratio beneath the MB (Figure 2B) was significantly lower than that in the segments proximal to the MB. The intima-media ratio in segments distal to the MB showed a similar tendency.
Intima-Media Ratio in MI Cases by MB Status
The cases that had a stent or an aortocoronary bypass in the LAD were excluded from the MI(+) group. Intima-media ratios at 5-mm intervals for a distance of 10 cm from the left coronary ostium in MI(+) cases are shown in Figure 2C. In the MI(+)MB(–) group, the intima-media ratio from the left coronary ostium up to 1.0 cm was modest, increased from 1.5 to 3.5 cm from the ostium, and displayed a subsequent decrease to 10.0 cm from the ostium.
Conversely, the intima-media ratio from the left coronary ostium to 1.0 cm in the MI(+)MB(+) group was greater than that at the corresponding site in the MI(+)MB(–) group. The intima-media ratio from 1.0 to 3.5 cm remained high, subsequently decreased up to 5.5 cm, and showed a gradual decrease up to 10.0 cm from the ostium.
In the MI(+)MB(–) group, fibroatheroma and more severe lesions were found in 224 (62.2%) of 360 sections in proximal LAD segments from the ostium to 4.5 cm. In the MI(–)MB(+) group, these intimal lesions were recognized in 224 (67.3%) of 333 sections in LAD segments proximal to the MB. The ratio of severe intimal lesions in proximal LAD segments was higher in the MI(+) groups than in the MI(–) groups. In the MI(+)MB(+) group, the intima-media ratio beneath the MB (Figure 2D) was significantly lower than that proximal to the MB, and the ratio distal to the MB was also lower than that proximal to the MB.
Intima-Media Ratio by MI Status
Variations in the intima-media ratio in the 4 groups are indicated in Figure 3. In the non-MB groups, there was no significant difference in intima-media ratio from the left coronary ostium up to 1.0 cm between the MI(–)MB(–) and MI(+)MB(–) groups, and the intima-media ratio from 1.5 cm up to 6.0 cm was greater in the MI(+)MB(–) group than in the MI(–)MB(–) group. Conversely, the intima-media ratio in the MI(+)MB(+) group was consistently greater than in the MI(–)MB(+) group from the left coronary ostium up to 7.5 cm.
|
Atherosclerosis Distribution Within the LAD by Location of MB Entrance
For the 2 MB(+) groups, the relationship between the location of the MB entrance and the location of the segment that exhibited the greatest intima-media ratio is shown in Figure 4A and 4B. Pearson correlation coefficient method demonstrated a positive correlation in both groups. The coefficient was greater in the MI(+)MB(+) group than in the MI(–)MB(+) group, and thus, the correlation between the 2 factors was stronger in the MI(+)MB(+) group than in the MI(–)MB(+) group.
|
The intima-media ratio at 5-mm intervals from the MB entrance (0 cm) upward to the left coronary ostium is shown in Figure 4C. In the MI(–)MB(+) group, intima-media ratios from 1.0 cm up to 5.0 cm from the MB entrance showed no significant fluctuation. On the other hand, in the MI(+)MB(+) group, the intima-media ratio showed a peak in the proximal segment 2.0 cm from the MB entrance, which indicated an aggregation of the severe stenotic lesion in the proximal site at 2.0 cm from the MB entrance.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In general, the majority of MBs are benign clinically,19,20 but an MB often induces the myocardial ischemic conditions of acute MI,15,21 ventricular fibrillation,14 cardiac sudden death,22 and atrioventricular block.23 However, the majority of such patients exhibit no considerable atherosclerosis in the LAD; their symptoms are caused by the hemodynamic alterations brought about by MB contraction. In fact, a decrease or loss of coronary compression by the MB at systole through administration of a β-blocker or surgical myotomy of MB relieves ischemic symptoms.24,25 Conversely, patients in the MI(+)MB(+) group in the present study exhibited atherosclerosis development in the LAD at a similar extent to that of the MI(+)MB(–) group, although a thicker MB and greater MMI were observed in the MI(+)MB(+) group than in the MI(–)MB(+) group. In MI hearts, it is thought that anatomic properties of the MB, such as its thickness and length, may exacerbate the preexisting coronary atherosclerosis.
In the present study, the pivotal roles of thickness and length of the MB on MI occurrence were evident. The intima-media ratio in LAD segments from the left coronary ostium up to 7.5 cm away in the MI(+)MB(+) group was greater than in the MI(–)MB(+) group. This does not suggest that the natural history of atherosclerosis in the former group may not be exacerbated by other risk factors, such as hypercholesterolemia or hypertension.26 In the present study, the intima-media ratio in the proximal short segments from the left coronary ostium up to 1.0 cm away in the MI(+)MB(+) group was greater than in the MI(+)MB(–) group, whereas in the MI(+)MB(–) group, it was not different from that in the MI(–)MB(–) group. This characteristic pattern of the intima-media ratio in such short LAD segments in the MI(+)MB(+) group is caused primarily by an increase of MMI. In our previous study using normal hearts, the difference in the intima-media ratio between segments proximal to the MB and segments beneath the MB was regulated by both the thickness and length of the MB.11 In addition, the atherosclerosis process in LAD segments proximal to the MB is subject to the complex hemodynamics caused by retrograde blood flow from the MB squeezing at systole.5,27 It is thus plausible that an increase of the MMI underlies an increase of contractile force by MB contraction, resulting in an increase of retrograde blood flow toward LAD segments proximal to the MB, which ultimately enhances the progression of atherosclerosis in the proximal LAD. The severity of atherosclerosis progression in proximal segments in the MI(+)MB(+) group may originate independently from the large value of the MMI.
The present study also demonstrates that the MB location that exhibits the large MMI affects the location of the segment that exhibits the greatest intima-media ratio in the LAD proximal to the MB. Although in the MI(–)MB(+) group, the location of the MB entrance correlated weakly with the location of the segment that exhibited the greatest intima-media ratio, this tendency was strongly correlated in the MI(+)MB(+) group. This difference between the MI(+) MB(+) and MI(–)MB(+) groups is caused by the difference in the MMI between them, which corroborates the role of the MMI as a decisive factor in localization of the most preferential site for atherosclerosis in the LAD segment proximal to the MB. It has been recognized generally that the most stenotic LAD lesion for anterior wall MI appears within 2 to 3 cm of the origin of the LAD28 or at a site 3 to 4 cm away from the left coronary ostium. In the present study, in the MI(+)MB(–) group, the greatest intima-media ratio was observed 3.5 cm away from the left coronary ostium, which is consistent with the report of a previous study.28 However, in the MI(+)MB(+) group, the most stenotic lesion was observed 2.0 cm away from the left coronary ostium, being more proximally situated than in the MI(+)MB(–) group. This difference in the preferential site for atherosclerosis within the entire LAD course between the 2 MI(+) groups was not found in the 2 control MI(–) groups. The presence of an MB with a greater MMI thus contributes to a shift of the severe intimal lesion upward to the left coronary ostium. In addition, the site of the greatest intima-media ratio in LAD segments proximal to the MB was situated 2.0 cm away from the MB in the MI(+)MB(+) group, whereas the MI(–) MB(+) group showed no significant peak of the intima-media ratio in LAD segments proximal to the MB. These findings indicate that the increase in MMI plays a role in the aggregation of the atherosclerosis progression at the prescribed site such as the proximal segment at 2.0 cm from the MB entrance.
In conclusion, in addition to the suppressive effect on atherosclerosis development in LAD segments beneath the MB in previous studies2,4,11,29 and the present study, which results from an alteration of the hemodynamic force of blood flow toward high shear stress beneath the MB,30,31 it is evident for the first time from the present study that certain anatomic properties of the MB enhance the development of atherosclerosis in the LAD proximal to the MB, resulting in MI.
The present study thus reveals that the MB plays the role of a "double-edged sword" in the development of coronary atherosclerosis in the LAD.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This study was supported in part by a research grant (No. 19590369 to Dr Ishii) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan.
Disclosures
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Ishii T, Asuwa N, Masuda S, Ishikawa Y. The effect of a myocardial bridge on coronary atherosclerosis and ischaemia. J Pathol. 1998; 185: 4–9.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Konen E, Goitein O, Di Segni E. Myocardial bridging, a common anatomical variant rather than a congenital anomaly. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2008; 29: 195–203.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Möhlenkamp S, Hort W, Ge J, Erbel R. Update on myocardial bridging. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2616–2622.
5. Ge J, Erbel R, Rupprecht HJ, Koch L, Kearney P, Gorge G, Haude M, Meyer J. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and angiography in the assessment of myocardial bridging. Circulation. 1994; 89: 1725–1732.
6. Ge J, Jeremias A, Rupp A, Abels M, Baumgart D, Liu F, Haude M, Gorge G, von Birgelen C, Sack S, Erbel R. New signs characteristic of myocardial bridging demonstrated by intracoronary ultrasound and Doppler. Eur Heart J. 1999; 20: 1707–1716.
7. Zeina AR, Odeh M, Binder J, Rosenschein U, Barmeir E. Myocardial bridge: evaluation on MDCT. Am J Roentgen. 2007; 188: 1069–1073.
8. Kawawa Y, Ishikawa Y, Gomi T, Nagamoto M, Terada H, Ishii T, Kohda E. Detection of myocardial bridge and evaluation of its anatomical properties by coronary multislice spiral computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2007; 61: 130–138.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Berry JF, von Mering GO, Schmalfuss C, Hill JA, Kerensky RA. Systolic compression of the left anterior descending coronary artery: a case series, review of literature, and therapeutic options including stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 2002; 56: 58–63.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Rychter K, Salanitri J, Edelman RR. Multifocal coronary artery myocardial bridging involving the right coronary and left anterior descending arteries detected by ECG-gated 64 slice multidetector CT coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2006; 22: 713–717.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Ishikawa Y, Akasaka Y, Ito K, Akishima Y, Kimura M, Kiguchi H, Fujimoto A, Ishii T. Significance of anatomical properties of myocardial bridge on atherosclerosis evolution in the left anterior descending coronary artery. Atherosclerosis. 2006; 186: 380–389.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Stary HC. Atlas of Atherosclerosis: Progression and Regression. Boca Raton, Fla: Parthenon Publishing; 1999.
13. Waller BF. Nonatherosclerotic coronary heart disease. In: Fuster V, Alexander RW, ORourke RA, eds. Hursts the Heart. 11th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2004: 1173–1213.
14. Faruqui AMA, Maloy WC, Felner JM, Schlant RC, Logan WD, Symbas P. Symptomatic myocardial bridging of coronary artery. Am J Cardiol. 1978; 41: 1305–1310.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Feldman AM, Baughman KL. Myocardial infarction associated with a myocardial bridge. Am Heart J. 1986; 111: 784–787.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Morales AR, Romanelli R, Tate LG, Boucek RJ, de Marchena E. Intramural left anterior descending coronary artery: significance of the depth of the muscular tunnel. Hum Pathol. 1993; 24: 693–701.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Ferreira AG Jr, Trotter SE, König B Jr, Decourt LV, Fox K, Olsen EGJ. Myocardial bridges: morphological and functional aspects. Br Heart J. 1991; 66: 364–367.
18. Noble J, Bourassa MG, Petitclerc R, Dydra I. Myocardial bridging and milking effect of the left anterior descending coronary artery: normal variant or obstruction? Am J Cardiol. 1976; 37: 993–999.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Kramer JR, Kitazume H, Proudfit WL, Sones FM Jr. Clinical significance of isolated coronary bridges: benign and frequent condition involving the left anterior descending coronary artery. Am Heart J. 1982; 103: 283–288.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Juilliere Y, Berder V, Suty-Selton C, Buffet P, Danchin N, Cherrier F. Isolated myocardial bridges with angiographic milking of left anterior descending coronary artery: a long-term follow-up study. Am Heart J. 1995; 129: 663–665.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Endo M, Lee YW, Hayashi H, Wada J. Angiographic evidence of myocardial squeezing accompanying tachyarrhythmia as a possible cause of myocardial infarction. Chest. 1978; 73: 431–433.
22. Morales AR, Romanelli R, Boucek RJ. The mural left anterior descending coronary artery, strenuous exercise and sudden death. Circulation. 1980; 62: 230–237.
23. den Dulk K, Brugada P, Braat S, Heddle B, Wellens HJJ. Myocardial bridge as a cause of paroxysmal atrioventricular block. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983; 1: 965–969.[Abstract]
24. Schwarz ER, Klues HG, vom Dhal J, Klein I, Krebs W, Hanrath P. Functional, angiographic and intracoronary Doppler flow characteristics in symptomatic patients with myocardial bridging: effect of short-term intravenous beta-blocker medication. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27: 1637–1645.[Abstract]
25. Grondin P, Bourassa MG, Noble J, Petitclerc R, Dydra I. Successful course after supraarterial myotomy for myocardial bridging and milking effect of the left anterior descending artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1977; 24: 422–428.[Abstract]
26. Maron DL, Grundy SM, Ridker PM, Person TA. Dyslipidemia, other risk factors, and prevention of coronary heart disease. In: Fuster V, Alexander RW, ORourke RA, eds. Hursts the Heart. 11th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2004: 1093–1122.
27. Ge J, Erbel R, Görge G, Haude M, Meyer J. High wall shear stress proximal to myocardial bridging and atherosclerosis: intracoronary ultrasound and pressure measurements. Br Heart J. 1995; 73: 462–465.
28. Wissler RW. The evolution of the atherosclerotic plaque and its complications. In: Connor WE, Bristow JD, eds. Coronary Heart Disease: Prevention, Complications, and Treatment. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott; 1985: 193–214.
29. Angelini P, Trivellato M, Donis J, Leachman RD. Myocardial bridges: a review. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1983; 26: 75–88.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Ishii T, Asuwa N, Masuda S, Ishikawa Y, Kiguchi H, Shimada K. Atherosclerosis suppression in the left anterior descending coronary artery by the presence of a myocardial bridge: an ultrastructural study. Mod Pathol. 1991; 4: 424–431.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Ishikawa Y, Ishii T, Asuwa N, Masuda S. Absence of atherosclerosis evolution in the coronary arterial segment covered by myocardial tissue in cholesterol-fed rabbits. Virchows Arch. 1997; 430: 163–171.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Related Articles:
This article has been cited by other articles:
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
A myocardial bridge (MB) that partially covers the course of the left anterior descending coronary artery may cause myocardial ischemia. In patients with myocardial infarction and an MB, the thickness of the MB and the MB muscle index (MB thickness times MB length) were significantly greater than in patients without myocardial infarction. Morphometric analyses of the left anterior descending coronary artery in MB patients with myocardial infarction demonstrated that the location of severe atherosclerotic disease in the left anterior descending coronary artery proximal to the MB correlated with the location of the MB entrance, and atherosclerosis progression in the LAD proximal to the MB was largest at 2.0 cm from the MB entrance. Thus, a greater MB muscle index was associated with a shift in severe left anterior descending coronary artery disease more proximally toward the coronary ostium. Clinicians should be aware of these associations when managing patients with an MB.
Circulation 2009 120: 355-356.
Circulation 2009 120: 357-359.
![]() |
R. Erbel, J. Ge, and S. Mohlenkamp Myocardial Bridging: A Congenital Variant as an Anatomic Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction? Circulation, August 4, 2009; 120(5): 357 - 359. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |