| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2009;120:86-95.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
AHA Science Advisory |
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: AHA Scientific Statements obesity surgery
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
30 kg/m2 and may be further subdivided into 5 grades (Table 1). With these BMI criteria, an estimated 65% of Americans are now classified as overweight or obese, thus predisposing >100 million Americans to a host of chronic diseases and serious medical conditions.2 For example, it was estimated from data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES III) that white women 20 to 30 years of age with a BMI
45 kg/m2 will lose 8 years of life, and their male counterparts will lose 13 years.3 The most rapidly growing segments of the obese population are the severely obese and superobese.4 Between 1986 and 2000, the numbers of individuals with a BMI >30, 40, and 50 kg/m2 are reported to have doubled, quadrupled, and quintupled, respectively, in the United States.5 The rising prevalence of severe obesity and superobesity coupled with the high risk for premature death in this population has markedly increased the demand for bariatric surgery as a means of achieving marked weight loss. Indeed, the number of bariatric operations performed in the United States has risen from 12 775 in 1998 and 70 256 in 2002 to an estimated >140 000 surgeries in 2005.6 Various bariatric procedures are available for management of high-risk obese patients. Currently, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures account for >80% of bariatric operations, although the proportion is changing with the advent of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band procedure.7 Given the increasing prevalence of severely obese patients, this scientific advisory was developed to provide evidence-based recommendations concerning preoperative cardiovascular evaluation, perioperative and intraoperative cardiopulmonary management, and postoperative care of severely obese patients undergoing surgery.
|
| Cardiovascular Conditions Associated With Severe Obesity |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Pulmonary hypertension may result from left ventricular failure, hypoxia due to sleep apnea, recurrent pulmonary emboli, or combinations thereof.1 Serious cardiac arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities related to obesity per se are rare.1 Arrhythmias in the obese are most commonly related to hypoxia due to sleep apnea, but obese patients may develop otherwise idiopathic atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and ventricular tachycardia, and even bradyarrhythmias related to sinus node dysfunction.1
The Cardiomyopathy of Obesity
Changes in cardiac hemodynamics associated with obesity may alter left ventricular structure and function and ultimately cause heart failure.1,11–13 These alterations may be present in children and adults with grades 1 and 2 obesity but are most pronounced in severely obese persons.1,11 The risk of heart failure due to severe obesity (obesity cardiomyopathy) begins to rise steeply after 10 years of severe obesity.1,14 Most patients with obesity cardiomyopathy have diastolic heart failure, but some manifest both diastolic and systolic dysfunction.1,14 Symptoms and signs of obesity cardiomyopathy occur most commonly in patients with a body size
75% of ideal body weight or with BMI
40 kg/m2. Many of the clinical manifestations and alterations in cardiac structure and function are reversible with substantial weight loss due to reverse remodeling, which is in part related to favorable alterations in loading conditions.1,13 Whether there is an intrinsic myocardial defect in obesity cardiomyopathy is uncertain.1,11,12
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk
The true prevalence of cardiovascular disease in the severely obese population is unknown. The Womens Health Initiative Observational Study reported an 11.5% prevalence of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and percutaneous coronary interventions among 3234 severely obese women.15 Numerous factors including diabetes mellitus, elevated serum triglyceride levels, reduced serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, chronic inflammation, and the prothrombotic state associated with obesity probably contribute to the cardiovascular risk in this patient population.1
Diagnosed or occult coronary heart disease (CHD) increases surgical risk. The prevalence of diagnosed CHD was not reported in a population-based analysis of 25 428 patients undergoing bariatric surgery, but the event rate for cardiac complications was 6.8 to 15.3 per 1000 patients.16 Rates of cardiac arrest and annualized mortality were 1.6% and 1.5%, respectively, among patients undergoing bariatric procedures.16,17 These rates are substantially higher than that associated with other forms of general surgery. With regard to bariatric surgery, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding clearly has the lowest risk of all of the procedures but is associated with a lower weight loss and lower resolution of comorbidities (Table 4). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is associated with a rapid remission of diabetes in most patients and greater weight loss but carries a somewhat higher operative risk (0.5% versus 0.1% in past studies)7,18,19; however, the overall operative risk has decreased markedly in recent years to 0.34% at 90 days. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch carries the greatest operative risk and possibly produces the greatest long-term weight loss, but the latter has not been confirmed with a randomized, prospective trial.7,18,19
|
| Cardiovascular Preoperative Evaluation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Considerations Specific to Obesity
Possible cardiac symptoms such as dyspnea with exertion and lower-extremity edema occur commonly but are nonspecific in obese patients.21 Because of increased ventilatory demands, exertional dyspnea is commonly attributable to noncardiac causes. Furthermore, the physical examination and electrocardiogram often underestimate the presence and degree of cardiac pathology and dysfunction in obese patients.1 Body size alone may camouflage jugular venous distention, and heart sounds are often distant. Pedal edema is common in massive obesity and may be a consequence of elevated right ventricular filling pressures or increased intra-abdominal pressure, despite an increased cardiac output.1,22 Electrocardiographic signs of right ventricular hypertrophy including right-axis deviation and right bundle-branch block suggest pulmonary hypertension, an important surgical risk factor. In contrast, a left bundle-branch block configuration is unusual in uncomplicated obesity and raises the possibility of occult CHD.
Mortality in the medical intensive care unit is significantly higher in severely obese patients than in lean patients.23,24 The risk of an adverse perioperative cardiac event is related to the degree of underlying CHD, associated comorbidities, and the type of surgery performed. Except for bariatric surgery, few data are available regarding the morbidity and mortality associated with severe obesity and specific surgical procedures. Cardiac surgeons often perceive obesity as a risk factor for perioperative adverse outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. Indeed, the Parsonnet risk-stratification scoring system attributes a score of 1 point for patients with morbid obesity, which is defined as >1.5 times ideal weight.25 Nevertheless, severe obesity is not associated with increased mortality but with an increased length of hospital stay and a greater likelihood of renal failure and prolonged assisted ventilation.26,27 Total knee arthroplasty has not been associated with increased perioperative deaths or fatal pulmonary emboli in severely obese patients,28 although 1 fatal pulmonary embolus was documented in a morbidly obese patient after nailing for femoral fracture.29 In a population-based historical study with data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, overweight and obese patients did demonstrate an increased rate of cardiac complications among patients undergoing urgent hip fracture repair.30 The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association divides surgical risk into low-risk surgery (<1% combined morbidity/mortality; eg, ambulatory surgery), intermediate-risk surgery (1% to 5% combined cardiac morbidity/mortality; eg, intra-abdominal or intrathoracic surgery), and vascular surgery.20 These categorizations were used in the decision algorithm for further testing, but it is unknown whether obesity influences these categorizations.
Most of the data on evaluating surgical risk in severely obese patients are derived from bariatric surgical results. The best choice for any bariatric procedure (type of procedure and type of approach) depends on the available local/regional expertise (surgeon and institution), patient preferences, BMI, metabolic variables, perioperative risk stratification, and comorbidities. The clinician should consider age, male sex, cardiorespiratory fitness, electrolyte disorders, and congestive heart failure as independent risk factors for surgical mortality.16,31 An exponential increase in mortality after the age of 65 years has been reported.16 BMI
50 kg/m2 and cigarette smoking have also been associated with a higher surgical complication rate.17 The only contraindications to bariatric surgery are persistent alcohol and drug dependence, uncontrolled severe psychiatric illness such as depression or schizophrenia, and cardiopulmonary disease that would make the risk prohibitive.7 Pulmonary embolism is the leading cause of mortality in experienced bariatric surgery centers. The incidence of pulmonary embolism in patients who have undergone bariatric surgical procedures has been reported as 0.1% to 2%.7
Alternatively, an Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS) has been validated in 4 bariatric programs in 4431 patients in the United States using 5 risk variables (comorbidities; Table 3).32,33 Class A (low risk) consisted of patients with 0 or 1 comorbidity. Class B (intermediate risk) consisted of patients with 2 to 3 comorbidities, and class C (high risk) consisted of patients with 4 to 5 comorbidities. Diabetes mellitus was not identified as a factor that increased mortality risk. All risk factors used to calculate the score are valued at 1 point. Overall mortality was 0.7%, and mortality rates at individual centers ranged from 0.4% to 2%. The highest-risk group (class C) comprised a very small proportion of available patients for analysis (3%). Mortality was 0.2% for class A, 1.2% for class B, and 2.4% for class C patients.33 Three quarters of all deaths occurred within 30 days of surgery. The most common cause of death was pulmonary embolism (30%), followed by cardiac causes (27%) and gastrointestinal leak (21%). Sudden death without a definitive diagnosis occurred in 15% of those patients who died.33
Indications for Further Testing
There are 6 known risk factors for perioperative cardiovascular morbidity in the general population according to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index.34 These include (1) high-risk surgery, such as emergency surgical procedures or major thoracic, abdominal, or vascular surgery; (2) history of CHD; (3) history of congestive heart failure; (4) history of cerebrovascular disease; (5) preoperative treatment with insulin; and (6) preoperative serum creatinine levels >2.0 mg/dL.20 Obese patients with no CHD risk factors who are referred for elective surgery may not require further testing. On the other hand, patients with
3 CHD risk factors or diagnosed CHD may require additional noninvasive testing if the results will change management. If significant coronary artery disease is found, surgery could be delayed to allow the institution and titration of appropriate medical therapy, such as statin or β-blocker therapy, or even coronary revascularization in appropriate patients with severe 3-vessel or left main disease.20,35 Although there is no consensus, patients with known or presumed coronary artery disease and high perioperative risk should be managed in an intensive care unit setting for the first 24 to 48 hours postoperatively (grade D).7 In 2 recent studies reporting the use of β-blockade in noncardiac surgery,36,37 BMI was not reported, and therefore, the risk/benefit assessment is unknown in this population. Notably, waist circumference is of limited value in predicting metabolic and cardiovascular risk in severely obese subjects.38,39 The results of the evaluation and any diagnostic testing should dictate further preoperative management and the need for evaluation by a cardiologist. Those candidates currently treated with a β-blocker or a statin should continued to receive these drugs perioperatively.20 Compensated heart failure may be aggravated by the fluid shifts associated with anesthesia and abdominal surgery. Intra-abdominal pressure exceeding 20 mm Hg during laparoscopy can impede venous return from the lower extremities and decrease cardiac output.40 Clinical assessment of concomitant valvular disease may also be important in severely obese patients because of prior exposure to appetite-suppressant drugs.41 Antibiotic therapy to prevent infective endocarditis should be used in accordance with recent guidelines.42
Patients with atrial fibrillation or nonbioprosthetic valves will routinely receive anticoagulation therapy preoperatively and need close monitoring in the perioperative period. Heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin can be used as a bridge before surgery, although the former requires preoperative hospital admission for its administration. Although there is consensus that subcutaneous unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin should be administered both preoperatively and postoperatively, few data exist concerning the appropriate dosing of these agents in severely obese and superobese patients. The literature supports low-molecular-weight heparin dosing based on total body weight in obese patients (90 to 150 kg), but only a small number of patients weighing >150 kg were included in these trials.43 It was reported that subtherapeutic anti-factor Xa levels are more common with once-daily dosing than with dosing every 12 hours in obese patients; therefore, it may be more prudent to recommend low-molecular-weight heparin twice daily in this population.43 Peak anti-factor Xa levels should be obtained 4 hours after administration if low-molecular-weight heparin utilization is contemplated in patients who previously had undergone chronic anticoagulation therapy.
Role of Stress Testing
Exercise testing remains the cornerstone of noninvasive cardiac evaluation, because it can provoke ischemic signs and symptoms in patients with occult hemodynamically significant disease. There are no specific recommendations for the medical preoperative evaluation of severely obese patients undergoing surgery, but the current American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines state that assessment of functional capacity, when possible, is the first step in the evaluation of all patients for noncardiac surgery.20 Severely obese patients have cardiorespiratory fitness levels comparable to those of slightly older patients with heart failure, and exercise performance in severely obese patients is inversely related to BMI.44 Exercise testing also helps predict postoperative complications in severely obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The composite complication rate of death, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, renal failure, and stroke occurred in 16.6% of severely obese patients whose peak oxygen consumption was <15.8 mL · kg–1 · min–1 but in only 2.8% of those whose cardiorespiratory fitness was
15.8 mL · kg–1 · min–1.31 Hospital lengths of stay and 30-day readmission rates were also highest in the lowest tertile of peak oxygen consumption.31 As described previously, the guidelines also utilize a surgical risk categorization (<1%, 1% to 5%, or vascular surgery) to help determine the need for further evaluation.20 In the assessment of perioperative cardiac risk in severely obese patients, transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography to detect the ischemic burden may be useful in patients with
1 CHD risk factor, those with poor echocardiographic windows, and those who are unable to exercise.45 Radionuclide ventriculography may be used to assess right and left ventricular function. The role of other imaging modalities (nuclear imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography) in the preoperative evaluation of severely obese patients has not been established. Importantly, several studies have been unable to document the benefits of coronary revascularization before noncardiac surgery, and therefore, noninvasive stress testing and coronary angiography should not be performed unless the results will change management, that is, use of a drug regimen such as β-blockers or revascularization.20 However, obesity cardiomyopathy, diabetic cardiomyopathy, or chronic long-standing significant myocardial ischemia (hibernating myocardium) may lead to heart failure in severely obese patients and should be identified before surgery. Functional exercise testing is the preferred evaluation modality, but some obese patients cannot exercise because of their weight or orthopedic issues, and some facilities do not have treadmills that are capable of supporting the severely obese. Such situations warrant pharmacological testing or the combination of exercise and pharmacological stress. Thus, functional capacity, cardiac risk factor analysis, and the presence or absence of potential cardiovascular symptoms will determine whether formal testing beyond electrocardiography is required.
The Figure provides an algorithm for the assessment of morbidly obese individuals undergoing noncardiac surgery. In patients at very low risk for heart and lung disease, routine chest radiography and electrocardiography add little information. The specific preoperative evaluation of the bariatric surgery patient should be directed toward symptoms, risk factors, and index of suspicion for secondary causes of obesity.7
|
| Intraoperative and Postoperative Management |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Induction and Intubation
Severely obese patients undergoing surgery are known to have reduced pulmonary functional residual capacity, a markedly decreased expiratory reserve volume, and a high incidence of obstructive sleep apnea. Mask ventilation may be difficult, and desaturation can occur more rapidly than in leaner patients because of a reduced capacity to tolerate periods of apnea. In severely obese patients, the 30° reverse Trendelenburg position, with the use of a ramp to elevate the head, neck, and shoulders, or configuration of the operating room table provides the safest apnea period for tracheal intubation compared with the supine horizontal or 30° backup Fowler position.47–49 Atelectasis formation is largely prevented by positive end-expiratory pressure applied during the anesthetic induction and is associated with more favorable oxygenation.50 Evidence regarding the difficulty of intubation through direct laryngoscopy is conflicting. In a series of 18 500 surgical patients, risk factors for difficult tracheal intubation included male sex, age 40 to 59 years, and obesity.51 In another study of 100 patients, neither absolute obesity nor BMI was associated with intubation difficulties.52 Large neck circumference and high Mallampati score (grading of visualization of the oropharynx) were the only predictors of potential intubation problems in the study by Brodsky et al,52 and importantly, all but 1 of the patients in that study were intubated successfully by direct laryngoscopy. Another study found that the extended Mallampati score, whereby the patients craniocervical junction is extended rather than neutral, is a better predictor of a difficult intubation.53 On the other hand, for some patients, fiber optic bronchoscopy may be the preferred intubation technique, but awake intubation with fiber optic bronchoscopy may be challenging in the severely obese patient.
Choice of Anesthesia
Few randomized trials are available to suggest that 1 general anesthetic is superior to another. In severely obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastroplasty, postoperative immediate and intermediate recoveries are more rapid and consistent after desflurane than after propofol or isoflurane anesthesia.54 Furthermore, severely obese adults who undergo major abdominal surgery awaken significantly faster after desflurane than after sevoflurane anesthesia, and patients anesthetized with desflurane have higher oxygen saturation on entry into the intensive care unit55; however, neither group had any perioperative morbidity. In contrast, others reported no difference between desflurane and sevoflurane in patients undergoing laparoscopic bypass surgery.56
Postoperative Care
There are few studies that address the management of severely obese patients immediately after surgery. The primary issue in postoperative care in a majority of patients is the interplay of underlying sleep apnea with both the recovery from the anesthetic agents and the need for postoperative pain management. Many patients with obstructive sleep apnea use nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation at home to maintain arterial oxygenation. Use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure postoperatively in these patients is critical to maintain oxygenation.
Pain management for severely obese individuals undergoing surgery can include patient-controlled intravenous analgesia or patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia. The latter is associated with a reduced rate of pulmonary complications and superior pain control in open abdominal surgery. The choice of postoperative analgesia technique is dependent in part on whether the surgical approach is laparoscopic or open. Schumann and colleagues57 randomized patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery to incisional local anesthetic infiltration plus postoperative patient-controlled analgesia, epidural anesthesia and analgesia, or postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. All received perioperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. The investigators concluded that infiltration analgesia as part of a multimodal regimen offers a simple, safe, and inexpensive alternative to epidural pain control. On the other hand, there is general concern about the use of continuous background opioid infusions in the severely obese patient, and a recent review recommended against it.58
| Considerations Regarding Diet, Physical Activity, and Weight-Loss Pharmacology |
|---|
|
|
|---|
35% of aerobic capacity (
O2max) when walking at a self-selected, comfortable pace,61 whereas obese individuals can expend as much as 56%
O2max (some using between 64% and 98%
O2max) to meet the demands of walking.62 In addition, outdoor walking can be especially challenging with uneven, graded, or slippery surfaces. Moreover, severe obesity may impair walking mechanics and efficiency, especially when obesity is of the gynecoid form. Gluteal fat may increase friction on clothing and skin, making it unpleasant to walk. This common problem is often neglected in clinical practice. Pharmacotherapeutic approaches in the management of severe obesity have been reported but require additional study63,64 and should be used with caution in the long term.41 Successful preoperative evaluation requires teamwork and communication among the patient, surgeon, primary care physician, anesthesiologist, and consultants. In general, severely obese patients have limited physiological reserves. Preoperative surgery consultation may be challenging in severely obese patients because of the inability to precisely assess surgical risk. Generally, sicker patients and those with major obesity-related complications, as well as reduced levels of cardiorespiratory fitness, present an increased risk for surgery. However, complications occur infrequently when surgery is performed by experienced surgeons in well-equipped centers with appropriate personnel. In severely obese patients, who are often young and apparently healthy, the prevalence of occult CHD requires the identification of conventional risk factors, although extensive preoperative cardiovascular testing is rarely indicated. A preoperative cardiac evaluation provides an opportunity for identification and treatment of short- and long-term cardiovascular risk in this patient subset. The OS-MRS may not be the definitive risk-stratification system ultimately used, but its simplicity for use by clinicians in their everyday practice of bariatric surgery may be of value. There is much more work to be done to clarify the potential clinical value of the proposed OS-MRS. Of note, only gastric bypass procedures have been studied, and mortality is the only outcome variable that has been analyzed. Although it is reasonable to assume that the higher rate of mortality found with higher levels of the OS-MRS correlates with a higher incidence of complications, this has not been examined. The role of comorbid conditions in increasing surgical risk is intuitively appealing but has been difficult to establish. There are patients with renal failure, prior myocardial infarction, coronary stent placement, or coronary artery bypass surgery who probably represent higher risks. These risk factors were not evaluated in the original reports.32,33 Given that morbidly obese subjects usually have an increased heart rate and that there is some controversy surrounding the use of β-blockers in noncardiac surgery, research should be performed in higher-risk morbidly obese patients regarding the use of β-blockers in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Also, prospective trials evaluating the benefit of preoperative weight loss should be performed.
The current obesity epidemic coupled with greater acceptance of the field of bariatric surgery has increased the number of weight-loss operations. Bariatric surgery provides an effective option for the long-term treatment of severely obese patients who have failed nonsurgical attempts to lose weight. In the near future, cardiologists may be involved more frequently in the preoperative evaluation of these patients; however, more research is needed to better characterize the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in severely obese individuals and to identify the patient at risk.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3 CHD risk factors or diagnosed CHD may require additional noninvasive testing if the clinician believes that the results will change management. Functional capacity, cardiac risk factor assessment, and the presence or absence of potential cardiovascular symptoms will determine whether formal evaluation beyond a comprehensive medical history, physical examination, ECG, and chest radiograph is necessary.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
This statement was approved by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee on April 1, 2009. A copy of the statement is available at http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3003999 by selecting either the "topic list" link or the "chronological list" link (No. LS-2093). To purchase additional reprints, call 843-216-2533 or e-mail kelle.ramsay@wolterskluwer.com.
The American Heart Association requests that this document be cited as follows: Poirier P, Alpert MA, Fleisher LA, Thompson PD, Sugerman HJ, Burke LE, Marceau P, Franklin BA; on behalf of the American Heart Association Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism, Council on Cardiopulmonary Perioperative and Critical Care, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Council on Clinical Cardiology. Cardiovascular evaluation and management of severely obese patients undergoing surgery: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2009;120:86–95.
Expert peer review of AHA Scientific Statements is conducted at the AHA National Center. For more on AHA statements and guidelines development, visit http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=3023366.
Permissions: Multiple copies, modification, alteration, enhancement, and/or distribution of this document are not permitted without the express permission of the American Heart Association. Instructions for obtaining permission are located at http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml? identifier=4431. A link to the "Permission Request Form" appears on the right side of the page.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. McInnis KJ, Franklin BA, Rippe JM. Counseling for physical activity in overweight and obese patients. Am Fam Physician. 2003; 67: 1249–1256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, Westfall AO, Allison DB. Years of life lost due to obesity. JAMA. 2003; 289: 187–193.
4. Standards Committee, American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Guidelines for reporting results in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 1997; 7: 521–522.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Sturm R. Increases in clinically severe obesity in the United States, 1986–2000. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 2146–2148.
6. Nguyen NT, Wilson SE. Complications of antiobesity surgery. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 4: 138–147.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Mechanick JI, Kushner RF, Sugerman HJ, Gonzalez-Campoy JM, Collazo-Clavell ML, Guven S, Spitz AF, Apovian CM, Livingston EH, Brolin R, Sarwer DB, Anderson WA, Dixon J. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery medical guidelines for clinical practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient. Endocr Pract. 2008; 14 (suppl 1): 1–83.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature. 2000; 404: 635–643.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Peeters A, Bonneux L, Nusselder WJ, De Laet C, Barendregt JJ. Adult obesity and the burden of disability throughout life. Obes Res. 2004; 12: 1145–1151.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Murphy NF, MacIntyre K, Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole D, McMurray JJ. Long-term cardiovascular consequences of obesity: 20-year follow-up of more than 15 000 middle-aged men and women (the Renfrew-Paisley study). Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 96–106.
11. Alpert MA. Obesity cardiomyopathy: pathophysiology and evolution of the clinical syndrome. Am J Med Sci. 2001; 321: 225–236.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Wong CY, O'Moore-Sullivan T, Leano R, Byrne N, Beller E, Marwick TH. Alterations of left ventricular myocardial characteristics associated with obesity. Circulation. 2004; 110: 3081–3087.
13. Poirier P, Martin J, Marceau P, Biron S, Marceau S. Impact of bariatric surgery on cardiac structure, function and clinical manifestations in morbid obesity. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2004; 2: 193–201.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Alpert MA, Terry BE, Mulekar M, Cohen MV, Massey CV, Fan TM, Panayiotou H, Mukerji V. Cardiac morphology and left ventricular function in normotensive morbidly obese patients with and without congestive heart failure, and effect of weight loss. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80: 736–740.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. McTigue K, Larson JC, Valoski A, Burke G, Kotchen J, Lewis CE, Stefanick ML, Van Horn L, Kuller L. Mortality and cardiac and vascular outcomes in extremely obese women. JAMA. 2006; 296: 79–86.
16. Livingston EH, Langert J. The impact of age and Medicare status on bariatric surgical outcomes. Arch Surg. 2006; 141: 1115–1120.
17. Livingston EH, Arterburn D, Schifftner TL, Henderson WG, DePalma RG. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis of bariatric operations: modifiable risk factors contribute to bariatric surgical adverse outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203: 625–633.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Sledge I. Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2007; 142: 621–632.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Lancaster RT, Hutter MM. Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multi-center, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP data. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22: 2554–2563.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof E, Fleischmann KE, Freeman WK, Froehlich JB, Kasper EK, Kersten JR, Riegel B, Robb JF, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) [published corrections appear in Circulation. 2008;118:e143–e144 and Circulation. 2008;117:e154]. Circulation. 2007; 116: e418–e499.
21. Karason K, Lindroos AK, Stenlöf K, Sjöström L. Relief of cardiorespiratory symptoms and increased physical activity after surgically induced weight loss: results from the Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 1797–1802.
22. Nakajima T, Fujioka S, Tokunaga K, Matsuzawa Y, Tarui S. Correlation of intraabdominal fat accumulation and left ventricular performance in obesity. Am J Cardiol. 1989; 64: 369–373.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Goulenok C, Monchi M, Chiche JD, Mira JP, Dhainaut JF, Cariou A. Influence of overweight on ICU mortality: a prospective study. Chest. 2004; 125: 1441–1445.
24. El Solh A, Sikka P, Bozkanat E, Jaafar W, Davies J. Morbid obesity in the medical ICU. Chest. 2001; 120: 1989–1997.
25. Bernstein AD, Parsonnet V. Bedside estimation of risk as an aid for decision-making in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 69: 823–828.
26. Wigfield CH, Lindsey JD, Muñoz A, Chopra PS, Edwards NM, Love RB. Is extreme obesity a risk factor for cardiac surgery? An analysis of patients with a BMI > or = 40. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006; 29: 434–440.
27. Villavicencio MA, Sundt TM III, Daly RC, Dearani JA, McGregor CG, Mullany CJ, Orszulak TA, Puga FJ, Schaff HV. Cardiac surgery in patients with body mass index of 50 or greater. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 83: 1403–1411.
28. Winiarsky R, Barth P, Lotke P. Total knee arthroplasty in morbidly obese patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80: 1770–1774.
29. McKee MD, Waddell JP. Intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures in morbidly obese patients. J Trauma. 1994; 36: 208–210.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Batsis JA, Huddleston JM, Melton LJ IV, Huddleston PM, Lopez-Jimenez F, Larson DR, Gullerud RE, McMahon MM. Body mass index and risk of adverse cardiac events in elderly patients with hip fracture: a population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009; 57: 419–426.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. McCullough PA, Gallagher MJ, DeJong AT, Sandberg KR, Trivax JE, Alexander D, Kasturi G, Jafri SM, Krause KR, Chengelis DL, Moy J, Franklin BA. Cardiorespiratory fitness and short-term complications after bariatric surgery. Chest. 2006; 130: 517–525.
32. DeMaria EJ, Portenier D, Wolfe L. Obesity surgery mortality risk score: proposal for a clinically useful score to predict mortality risk in patients undergoing gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007; 3: 134–140.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. DeMaria EJ, Murr M, Byrne TK, Blackstone R, Grant JP, Budak A, Wolfe L. Validation of the obesity surgery mortality risk score in a multicenter study proves it stratifies mortality risk in patients undergoing gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2007; 246: 578–582.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF, Sugarbaker DJ, Donaldson MC, Poss R, Ho KK, Ludwig LE, Pedan A, Goldman L. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999; 100: 1043–1049.
35. Garcia S, Moritz TE, Ward HB, Pierpont G, Goldman S, Larsen GC, Littooy F, Krupski W, Thottapurathu L, Reda DJ, McFalls EO. Usefulness of revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease before elective vascular surgery for abdominal aortic and peripheral occlusive disease. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 102: 809–813.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Yusuf S, Guyatt G, Leslie K, Villar JC, Xavier D, Chrolavicius S, Greenspan L, Pogue J, Pais P, Liu L, Xu S, Málaga G, Avezum A, Chan M, Montori VM, Jacka M, Choi P; POISE Study Group. Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 371: 1839–1847.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Kaafarani HM, Atluri PV, Thornby J, Itani KM. Beta-blockade in noncardiac surgery: outcome at all levels of cardiac risk. Arch Surg. 2008; 143: 940–944.
38. Minocci A, Guzzaloni G, Marzullo P, Savia G, Tagliaferri M, Berselli ME, Liuzzi A. Abdominal fat index by ultrasound does not estimate the metabolic risk factors of cardiovascular disease better than waist circumference in severe obesity. Diabetes Metab. 2005; 31: 471–477.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Drapeau V, Lemieux I, Richard D, Bergeron J, Tremblay A, Biron S, Marceau P, Mauriège P. Waist circumference is useless to assess the prevalence of metabolic abnormalities in severely obese women. Obes Surg. 2007; 17: 905–909.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Chui PT, Gin T, Oh TE. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic general surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993; 21: 163–171.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Drolet B, Simard C, Poirier P. Impact of weight-loss medications on the cardiovascular system: focus on current and future anti-obesity drugs. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2007; 7: 273–288.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M, Lockhart PB, Baddour LM, Levison M, Bolger A, Cabell CH, Takahashi M, Baltimore RS, Newburger JW, Strom BL, Tani LY, Gerber M, Bonow RO, Pallasch T, Shulman ST, Rowley AH, Burns JC, Ferrieri P, Gardner T, Goff D, Durack DT. Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Association: a guideline from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group [published correction appears in Circulation. 2007;166:e376–e377]. Circulation. 2007; 116: 1736–1754.
43. George-Phillips KL, Bungard TJ. Use of low-molecular-weight heparin to bridge therapy in obese patients and in patients with renal dysfunction. Pharmacotherapy. 2006; 26: 1479–1490.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Gallagher MJ, Franklin BA, Ehrman JK, Keteyian SJ, Brawner CA, deJong AT, McCullough PA. Comparative impact of morbid obesity vs heart failure on cardiorespiratory fitness. Chest. 2005; 127: 2197–2203.
45. Bhat G, Daley K, Dugan M, Larson G. Preoperative evaluation for bariatric surgery using transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography. Obes Surg. 2004; 14: 948–951.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Schumann R, Jones SB, Ortiz VE, Connor K, Pulai I, Ozawa ET, Harvey AM, Carr DB. Best practice recommendations for anesthetic perioperative care and pain management in weight loss surgery. Obes Res. 2005; 13: 254–266.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Perilli V, Sollazzi L, Modesti C, Annetta MG, Sacco T, Bocci MG, Tacchino RM, Proietti R. Comparison of positive end-expiratory pressure with reverse Trendelenburg position in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery: effects on hemodynamics and pulmonary gas exchange. Obes Surg. 2003; 13: 605–609.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Coussa M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Prevention of atelectasis formation during the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2004; 98: 1491–1495.
49. Rao SL, Kunselman AR, Schuler HG, DesHarnais S. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in the head-elevated position in obese patients: a randomized, controlled, equivalence trial. Anesth Analg. 2008; 107: 1912–1918.
50. Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2005; 100: 580–584.
51. Rose DK, Cohen MM. The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients. Can J Anaesth. 1994; 41 (pt 1): 372–383.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ, Brock-Utne JG, Vierra M, Saidman LJ. Morbid obesity and tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2002; 94: 732–736.
53. Mashour GA, Kheterpal S, Vanaharam V, Shanks A, Wang LY, Sandberg WS, Tremper KK. The extended Mallampati score and a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus are predictors of difficult laryngoscopy in the morbidly obese. Anesth Analg. 2008; 107: 1919–1923.
54. Juvin P, Vadam C, Malek L, Dupont H, Marmuse JP, Desmonts JM. Postoperative recovery after desflurane, propofol, or isoflurane anesthesia among morbidly obese patients: a prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg. 2000; 91: 714–719.
55. Strum EM, Szenohradszki J, Kaufman WA, Anthone GJ, Manz IL, Lumb PD. Emergence and recovery characteristics of desflurane versus sevoflurane in morbidly obese adult surgical patients: a prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg. 2004; 99: 1848–1853.
56. De Baerdemaeker LE, Jacobs S, Den Blauwen NM, Pattyn P, Herregods LL, Mortier EP, Struys MM. Postoperative results after desflurane or sevoflurane combined with remifentanil in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2006; 16: 728–733.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Schumann R, Shikora S, Weiss JM, Wurm H, Strassels S, Carr DB. A comparison of multimodal perioperative analgesia to epidural pain management after gastric bypass surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003; 96: 469–474.
58. Whalen FX, Gajic O, Thompson GB, Kendrick ML, Que FL, Williams BA, Joyner MJ, Hubmayr RD, Warner DO, Sprung J. The effects of the alveolar recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on arterial oxygenation during laparoscopic bariatric surgery [published correction appears in Anesth Analg. 2006;102:881]. Anesth Analg. 2006; 102: 298–305.
59. Fris RJ. Preoperative low energy diet diminishes liver size. Obes Surg. 2004; 14: 1165–1170.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Klein S, Burke LE, Bray GA, Blair S, Allison DB, Pi-Sunyer X, Hong Y, Eckel RH. Clinical implications of obesity with specific focus on cardiovascular disease: a statement for professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation. 2004; 110: 2952–2967.
61. Poirier P, Després JP. Exercise in weight management of obesity. Cardiol Clin. 2001; 19: 459–470.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Mattsson E, Larsson UE, Rössner S. Is walking for exercise too exhausting for obese women? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997; 21: 380–386.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
63. Wadden TA, Berkowitz RI, Womble LG, Sarwer DB, Phelan S, Cato RK, Hesson LA, Osei SY, Kaplan R, Stunkard AJ. Randomized trial of lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy for obesity. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 2111–2120.
64. Van Gaal LF, Rissanen AM, Scheen AJ, Ziegler O, Rössner S; RIO-Europe Study Group. Effects of the cannabinoid-1 receptor blocker rimonabant on weight reduction and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight patients: 1-year experience from the RIO-Europe study [published correction appears in Lancet. 2005;366:370]. Lancet. 2005; 365: 1389–1397.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. L Blackburn, S. Wollner, and S. B Heymsfield Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of class III obesity: a primary target for nutrition medicine in the obesity epidemic Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2010; 91(1): 289S - 292S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Louie, M. Acosta, K. Winter, C. Jean, S. Gavali, R. Schechter, D. Vugia, K. Harriman, B. Matyas, C. A. Glaser, et al. Factors Associated With Death or Hospitalization Due to Pandemic 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Infection in California JAMA, November 4, 2009; 302(17): 1896 - 1902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |