Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;119:2305-2312
Published online before print April 20, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.820993
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
119/17/2305    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.820993v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, T. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Hip Injuries and Disorders
*Hip Replacement
*Osteoporosis
*Peripheral Arterial Disease
Related Collections
Right arrow Peripheral vascular disease
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2009;119:2305-2312.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Epidemiology

Peripheral Arterial Disease Is Associated With Higher Rates of Hip Bone Loss and Increased Fracture Risk in Older Men

Tracie C. Collins, MD, MPH; Susan K. Ewing, MS; Susan J. Diem, MD, MPH; Brent C. Taylor, PhD; Eric S. Orwoll, MD; Steven R. Cummings, MD; Elsa S. Strotmeyer, PhD, MPH; Kristine E. Ensrud, MD, MPH, for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Group

From the Department of Medicine (T.C.C., S.J.D., B.C.T., K.E.E.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.K.E.), University of California, San Francisco, Calif; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health (S.J.D., B.C.T., K.E.E.), School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn; Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research (B.C.T., K.E.E.), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minn; Bone and Mineral Unit (E.S.O.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore; Research Institute (S.R.C.), California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif; and Center for Aging and Population Health (E.S.S.), Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Correspondence to Tracie C. Collins, MD, MPH, University of Minnesota, Department of Medicine, 717 Delaware St SE, Suite 166, Minneapolis, MN 55414. E-mail tcc{at}umn.edu

Received September 11, 2008; accepted March 3, 2009.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and osteoporosis are chronic illnesses that increase in prevalence with aging and certain metabolic disorders. The association between PAD, rates of bone loss, and fracture risk in older men is uncertain.

Methods and Results— We sought to test the hypothesis that PAD is associated with higher rates of bone loss and increased fracture risk. We analyzed data from a prospective cohort study involving 6 US centers and 5781 men at least 65 years of age. We assessed ankle-brachial index and hip bone mineral density, followed up prospectively for changes in hip bone mineral density and fractures. PAD was defined as a baseline ankle-brachial index <0.9. Hip bone mineral density was measured with dual x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and again an average of 4.6 years later. Incident nonspine fractures were ascertained by self-report and confirmed with radiography reports during an average of 5.4 years of follow-up. At baseline, the prevalence of PAD was 6.2%. After adjustment for age, race, site, and baseline bone mineral density, the mean annualized rate of bone loss at the total hip was –0.66% per year (95% confidence interval –0.78 to –0.54) in men with PAD compared with –0.34% per year (95% confidence interval –0.36 to –0.31) in men without PAD (P<0.001). After further adjustment for multiple potential confounders, the difference was attenuated (–0.49% in men with PAD versus –0.35% in men without PAD) but remained significant (P=0.02). Findings were similar at hip subregions. Twelve percent of men with PAD and 7.9% of those without PAD experienced an incident nonspine fracture (hazard ratio adjusted for age, race, and site=1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 2.04); this association was not altered substantially by further adjustment for multiple confounders.

Conclusions— In community-dwelling older men, PAD was associated with higher rates of hip bone loss and increased risk of nonspine fractures. Further research should examine the biological mechanisms underlying the association between reduced limb blood flow and fractures.


Key Words: peripheral arterial disease • bone loss • fractures


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Fractures related to osteoporosis and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are major causes of morbidity and mortality in older people.1,2 Evidence exists to support an association between atherosclerosis of peripheral vessels and osteoporosis. Laroche et al3 conducted a study of 25 patients with unilateral lower-limb PAD and reported that bone mineral density (BMD) at the femur, ankle, and foot was lower in the PAD-affected limb than in the unaffected limb. Similarly, Pennisi et al4 conducted a case-control study and found lower spine and hip BMD among 36 patients with either carotid or femoral atherosclerosis than among age- and gender-matched control subjects. In addition, previous large observational studies have provided evidence of an association between low BMD and either incident cardiovascular disease5 or subclinical atherosclerosis.6–8

Clinical Perspective on p 2312

However, most prior investigations that examined the association between PAD and bone health were cross-sectional analyses of patient populations selected on the basis of their risk for PAD and were focused primarily on women. Thus, findings may not be applicable to a longitudinal assessment of unselected community-dwelling older men. Prospective studies are needed to accurately examine the association between PAD and subsequent rates of bone loss and fracture risk. To test the hypothesis that older men with PAD have increased rates of bone loss and higher fracture risk, we measured ankle-brachial index (ABI) and hip BMD in a cohort of community-dwelling men 65 years of age and older in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Older Men (MrOS) study and followed them prospectively for changes in BMD and fractures.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Participants
From March 2000 to April 2002, 5995 men at least 65 years old were recruited for participation in the baseline examination of the prospective MrOS study, a large observational study of the determinants of fracture risk in older men.9 Men were recruited from population-based listings in Birmingham, Ala; Minneapolis, Minn; the Monongahela Valley, Pa; Palo Alto, Calif; Portland, Ore; and San Diego, Calif.10

Of the 5995 men enrolled in MrOS, 5781 (96.4%) had ABI data at the baseline examination (Figure 1). Of the 214 men without ABI measurements, measurements were attempted but not completed on 116 men because of an inability to occlude or locate the tibial arteries, or for other reasons; 74 men refused to be measured; and 24 men met exclusion criteria (20 with open wounds or ulcerations, 3 who were unable to lie at a 45° angle, and 1 who had bilateral amputations).


Figure 1192410
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Enrollment flowchart.

A total of 4409 (76% of active survivors) of the 5781 men with baseline ABI data attended a second clinic examination between March 2005 and April 2006. Of these, 4302 completed a technically adequate hip BMD measurement at both examinations and were included in the analyses investigating the association between PAD and rate of change in hip BMD. All 5781 men with baseline ABI measurements were included in the analyses examining the association between PAD and risk of incident fractures (Figure 1). The appropriate institutional review boards reviewed the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

Measurement of BMD
BMD (g/cm2) of the total hip and its subregions (femoral neck; trochanter) was measured at the 2 examinations (mean 4.6 [0.3 SD] years between examinations) with fan-beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (QDR 4500W, Hologic Inc, Bedford, Mass). Further details of the measurement method, densitometry quality control procedures, and precision of the measurements in the present study cohort have been published elsewhere.9,11 For the primary analysis, the rate of change in BMD was expressed as an annualized percentage of the difference between the follow-up BMD and initial BMD divided by the initial BMD.

Ascertainment of Fractures
We contacted participants by postcard or telephone every 4 months to ask whether they had sustained a fracture. We were able to complete 99% of these contacts in surviving men. Fractures were verified by physician adjudication of medical records and x-ray reports. Unconfirmed and pathological fractures were not considered in the analyses. All confirmed fractures that occurred and were adjudicated after the baseline examination and by August 1, 2007, were included in these analyses. Average follow-up was 5.4 (1.4 SD) years for nonspine fractures and 5.6 (1.2 SD) years for hip fractures.

Peripheral Arterial Disease
The diagnosis of PAD was based on the ABI, the ratio of the systolic pressure in the ankle to that in the arm. Systolic blood pressure was measured in each arm once, and the average of the 2 measurements was obtained. Systolic blood pressure was measured twice in each foot, and an average was taken of the 2 readings from each foot. From this, an ABI was obtained for each leg. Subjects with a resting ABI of less than 0.9 in either leg were classified as having PAD.12 In secondary analyses, we classified ABIs of 0.70 to 0.89 as mild disease, 0.41 to 0.69 as moderate disease, and ≤0.4 as severe disease.13 For the latter category, none of the participants had ABI levels in the range of severe disease.

Other Measurements
Participants completed a questionnaire and were interviewed at the baseline examination. Race/ethnicity was based on self-declaration. In addition to questions about race/ethnicity, participants were asked about age; health status; physical activity, including completion of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly14; use of walking for exercise; social habits; and past medical history. Participants were asked to bring with them to the clinic all current prescription medications used daily or almost daily for at least the past month for verification of use.

Participants were classified as diabetic if they had a fasting (≥8 hours) glucose level ≥126 mg/dL or prevalent self-reported diabetes mellitus at baseline or were using hypoglycemic agents or insulin at baseline. Tests of physical function included inability to rise from a chair (without using arms) 5 times. Weight change was calculated by subtracting weight at the baseline examination from weight at the second examination and was expressed as a percentage of the baseline value. Body mass index was calculated with weight (kg)/height (m2). Participants’ renal function was assessed by estimating the glomerular filtration rate based on the Modified Diet in Renal Disease equation.15

Statistical Analysis
To compare characteristics at the baseline examination by category of PAD (no PAD [ABI ≥0.9] versus PAD [ABI <0.9]), {chi}2 tests were used for categorical variables (Fisher exact tests for categorical data with low expected cell counts), t tests were used for normally distributed continuous data, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for skewed continuous data. For the primary analysis examining the association between PAD and rate of change in BMD at the total hip and its subregions (femoral neck, trochanter), the annualized mean change in BMD and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for men with and without PAD by the least square means procedure. Known risk factors for bone loss and characteristics related to PAD were examined for inclusion in multivariable models for the associations between PAD and rate of change in BMD. We included in our multivariable models age, race, site, baseline hip BMD, and those variables that were related to PAD at P≤0.10 and rate of change in BMD at P≤0.10, independent of age (ie, self-reported health status, walks for exercise, smoking status, alcohol use, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, loop diuretic use, weight change, inability to rise from a chair, and estimated glomerular filtration rate [Modified Diet in Renal Disease index]).

In secondary analyses, the least squares means procedure was used to compare adjusted mean annualized percentage change in BMD according to PAD severity (moderate versus mild versus no PAD), with results presented as adjusted means and 95% CI and P for trend across the 3 categories. Because high levels of ABI may be indicative of underlying vascular calcification,16–20 and because vascular calcification has been associated with osteoporosis and bone loss,21 we also examined the mean annualized percent change in BMD by decile of ABI to further characterize rate of change in BMD at the extremes of ABI.

Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association between baseline PAD status and subsequent risk of nonspine fracture and hip fracture, with results presented as hazard ratios and 95% CIs. We included in our multivariable models age, race, site, and those variables that were related to PAD at P≤0.10 and the fracture outcome of interest at P≤0.10, independent of age. All analyses were performed with SAS software (version 9.1, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).

The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Characteristics of the Study Population
Baseline characteristics of the 5781 men according to PAD status are shown in Table 1. Of the 5781 men in the cohort, 358 (6.2%) had evidence of PAD as defined by an ABI <0.9, including 242 men with mild PAD (ABI 0.70 to 0.89) and 116 with moderate PAD (ABI 0.41 to 0.69; Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of 5781 Participants According to PAD Disease Status*

Of the 5781 men in the cohort, 703 (12%) did not return for visit 2. The percentage of men who did not return for visit 2 increased with PAD severity: 11% of men without PAD did not return for visit 2 versus 28% among men with mild PAD and 32% among men with moderate PAD (P<0.001). Of the 4302 men with initial and follow-up hip BMD measurements an average of 4.6 years later who were included in the analysis that examined the association between baseline PAD status and subsequent rates of change in hip BMD, 189 (4.4%) had PAD at baseline. Among the 169 men with baseline PAD who did not complete repeat hip BMD measurements, 82 (52 men with mild PAD and 30 with moderate PAD) had died, 12 (7 with mild PAD and 5 with moderate PAD) terminated their participation in the study, and 67 (44 with mild PAD and 23 with moderate PAD) did not attend the second examination, primarily owing to poor health.

PAD and Rates of Change in Hip BMD
Average rates of change in BMD at the total hip and subregions according to PAD status are shown in Table 2. On average, men with PAD had a higher rate of bone loss at the total hip than men without PAD (–0.78% versus –0.33% per year, P<0.001). The association was only slightly diminished after adjustment for age, race, clinical site, and baseline total hip BMD (–0.66% versus –0.34% per year, P<0.001). After further adjustment for multiple potential confounders, the difference was attenuated but remained significant (–0.49% versus –0.35% per year, P=0.02).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Mean Annualized Percentage Change in BMD (95% CI) According to PAD Status (ABI <0.90) and Hip Region

At the femoral neck, the mean annualized rate of bone change in the multivariable model was –0.60% per year (95% CI –0.76 to –0.43) and –0.32% per year (95% CI –0.35 to –0.28) for men with and without PAD, respectively (P=0.001). Mean annualized percent rates of change in hip BMD by severity of PAD are shown in Table 3. We did not find evidence of a graded association between PAD severity and rate of hip bone loss.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Mean Annualized Percentage Change in BMD (95% CI) According to Severity of PAD and Hip Region

We determined mean annualized percent rates of change in total hip BMD by decile of ABI. Evidence was found that the adjusted rate of hip bone loss was greater among men in decile 1 (ABI <0.99, mean loss –0.61% per year) and among men in decile 10 (ABI ≥1.33, mean loss –0.40% per year) than among men in the intermediate deciles 2 to 9 (ABI 0.99 to 1.33, mean loss –0.32% per year; P<0.001 for decile 1 versus deciles 2 to 9 and P=0.07 for decile 10 versus deciles 2 to 9). Rates of loss were similar among men in the intermediate deciles (P>0.16 for comparisons between deciles).

PAD and Fractures
During a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (SD 1.4 years), 42 men with PAD (12%), including 17 with moderate PAD (15%) and 25 with mild PAD (10%), experienced at least 1 nonspine fracture compared with 431 (8%) men without PAD. After adjustment for age, site, and race, men with PAD relative to those without PAD had a 1.5-fold increase (hazard ratio 1.47, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.04) in risk of nonspine fracture (Figure 2). Further individual adjustment for several additional covariates only modestly attenuated the association.


Figure 2192410
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Adjusted risk of nonspine and hip fractures for men with PAD compared with men without PAD. COPD indicates chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; PASE, Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly; and CVD, cardiovascular disease.

During a mean follow-up of 5.6 years (SD 1.2 years), 12 men with PAD (3%), including 6 with moderate PAD (5%) and 6 with mild PAD (2%), experienced at least 1 hip fracture compared with 76 men without PAD (1%). After adjustment for age, site, and race, men with PAD relative to those without PAD had a 1.6-fold increase (hazard ratio 1.60, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.99) in risk for first hip fracture, which did not reach statistical significance (Figure 2). Further individual adjustment for several additional covariates did not substantially alter the magnitude of the point estimate of the association, with the exception of baseline hip BMD and inability to rise from a chair 5 times (without using the arms). After adjustment for age, hip BMD, and inability to rise from a chair, no evidence was found of an association between PAD and risk of hip fracture (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.13).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We found that PAD among community-dwelling older men was independently associated with higher rates of hip bone loss. This association remained after adjustment for several potential confounders. Although our power was limited in examining the association between PAD and risk of hip fracture, the present findings suggest that an association between PAD and hip fracture in older men is primarily explained by older age, lower hip BMD, and poorer lower-extremity performance among men with PAD.

These findings are generally consistent with those reported from prior population-based studies that have examined the cross-sectional association between PAD and BMD.8,22–24 One cross-sectional study of nearly 4000 Chinese men and women 65 to 92 years of age reported that PAD (prevalence 6.8%) was negatively correlated with total hip BMD in the unadjusted analyses, but the correlation was greatly reduced after adjustment for potential confounders.24 In addition, prior studies, including those based on cross-sectional and longitudinal data, have evaluated the association between low bone mass and subclinical atherosclerosis (ie, calcification of coronary or aortic arteries) in various populations, particularly women and minorities.7,21,24,25 In general, these studies have reported an inverse relationship between BMD and calcification of the aorta7,25,26 and coronary arteries.27 In 1 longitudinal study,7 the progression of aortic calcification was linked to higher rates of trabecular bone loss at the spine in postmenopausal women.

An association between PAD and higher rates of bone loss may exist for several reasons. Risk factors for atherosclerosis and osteoporosis overlap. Notably, older age, physical inactivity, smoking, and diabetes mellitus have been linked to both atherosclerosis and osteoporosis. In addition, adults with type II diabetes mellitus are more likely to have PAD than nondiabetic adults,16,28 and increasing evidence suggests that older adults with type II diabetes mellitus have higher rates of bone loss.29–31 Although the association between PAD and higher rates of bone loss among older men in the present study was attenuated after adjustment for these and other potential confounders, an independent association between PAD and higher rates of hip bone loss remained. Aside from shared clinical risk factors, shared biological pathways32–34 may explain the link between PAD, bone loss, and fracture risk. For example, reduced renal function has been linked to both PAD35,36 and higher rates of bone loss and increased risk of fracture37,38; however, in the present cohort, the association between PAD and higher rates of bone loss remained despite adjustment for renal function. In addition, higher levels of inflammatory markers, including homocysteine, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6, have been linked to both PAD39–41 and higher rates of bone loss and increased risk of fractures.42–47

The present findings also suggest that high ABI, a marker of vascular calcification and increased vessel stiffness, may be associated with increased rates of hip bone loss. Prior studies of vascular calcification and osteoporosis have primarily been conducted in women, but those that have included men have been cross-sectional in design and have not reported an independent association between vascular calcification and lower BMD in men.21,48,49

Using prospective data, we demonstrate an association between PAD and risk of fracture in older men. The association between PAD and increased risk of nonspine fracture was not altered substantially despite adjustment for several potential confounders.

The present study has several strengths, including its prospective design, enrollment of community-dwelling older men not selected on the basis of PAD or low BMD, an objective assessment of atherosclerosis of the lower extremities, and nearly complete ascertainment of incident fractures blinded to PAD status. However, the present study is not without limitations. First, the participants were predominantly white men, such that the results of the present study may not be generalizable to more racially diverse populations or older women. The present results on the relationship between PAD and higher rates of bone loss may underestimate this association, because men with PAD compared with those without were more likely to not return to the clinic for repeat hip BMD measurements, usually because of death in the interim or poor health. We also did not observe a graded association between PAD severity and rates of bone loss; however, because men with moderate to severe PAD were more likely to be missing a repeat BMD measurement than those with mild PAD, our power was limited to detect this relationship. Besides renal function, we were not able to examine potential biological markers that may mediate the association between PAD, bone loss, and fracture. The present findings are limited to PAD as defined by the ABI. We did not use other methods (eg, pulse volume recordings) to determine the presence of disease. Also, we did not perform repeat ABI measurements at the second examination, which prevented us from examining whether progression of PAD was concurrently associated with increasing rates of bone loss. Finally, we did not measure biomarkers such as vitamin D level; additional adjustment for vitamin D levels may have further attenuated the association of PAD with rates of bone loss and fracture.

In conclusion, community-dwelling older men with PAD have higher rates of hip bone loss and an increased risk of nonspine fractures. These findings suggest that PAD should be added to the list of secondary medical conditions such as Parkinsonism and stroke that are associated with a greater likelihood of higher rates of bone loss and fracture among older people. Future research should examine potential biological mechanisms underlying this association.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We would like to acknowledge Kyle A. Moen for his assistance in preparation of the manuscript and formatting of the tables and figures.

Sources of Funding

The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study is supported by National Institutes of Health funding. The following institutes provide support: the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), the National Institute on Aging (NIA), the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), and the National Institutes of Health Roadmap for Medical Research under the following grant numbers: U01 AR45580, U01 AR45614, U01 AR45632, U01 AR45647, U01 AR45654, U01 AR45583, U01 AG18197, U01 AG027810, and UL1 RR024140; as well as the American Diabetes Association (principal investigator: Dr Strotmeyer; 1-04-JF-46).

Disclosures

Dr Collins is a member of the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee for Synteract/ViroMed. The remaining authors report no conflicts.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. McFarlane SI, Muniyappa R, Shin JJ, Bahtiyar G, Sowers JR. Osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease: brittle bones and boned arteries, is there a link? Endocrine. 2004; 23: 1–10.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001; 285: 2486–2497.[Free Full Text]

3. Laroche M, Moulinier L, Leger P, Lefebvre D, Mazieres B, Boccalon H. Bone mineral decrease in the leg with unilateral chronic occlusive arterial disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003; 21: 103–106.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Pennisi P, Signorelli SS, Riccobene S, Celotta G, Di Pino L, La, Malfa T, Fiore CE. Low bone density and abnormal bone turnover in patients with atherosclerosis of peripheral vessels. Osteoporos Int. 2004; 15: 389–395.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Farhat GN, Newman AB, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Matthews KA, Boudreau R, Schwartz AV, Harris T, Tylavsky F, Visser M, Cauley JA. The association of bone mineral density measures with incident cardiovascular disease in older adults. Osteoporos Int. 2007; 18: 999–1008.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Farhat GN, Cauley JA, Matthews KA, Newman AB, Johnston J, Mackey R, Edmundowicz D, Sutton-Tyrrell K. Volumetric BMD and vascular calcification in middle-aged women: the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. J Bone Miner Res. 2006; 21: 1839–1846.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Schulz E, Arfai K, Liu X, Sayre J, Gilsanz V. Aortic calcification and the risk of osteoporosis and fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89: 4246–4253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Vogt MT, Cauley JA, Kuller LH, Nevitt MC. Bone mineral density and blood flow to the lower extremities: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 1997; 12: 283–289.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Orwoll E, Blank JB, Barrett-Connor E, Cauley J, Cummings S, Ensrud K, Lewis C, Cawthon PM, Marcus R, Marshall LM, McGowan J, Phipps K, Sherman S, Stefanick ML, Stone K. Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study: a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men. Contemp Clin Trials. 2005; 26: 569–585.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Blank JB, Cawthon PM, Carrion-Petersen ML, Harper L, Johnson JP, Mitson E, Delay RR. Overview of recruitment for the osteoporotic fractures in men study (MrOS). Contemp Clin Trials. 2005; 26: 557–568.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM. Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. JAMA. 2002; 288: 1889–1897.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Fowkes F. The measurement of atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease in epidemiological surveys. Int J Epidemiol. 1988; 17: 248–254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Hiatt W. Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease and claudication. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1608–1621.[Free Full Text]

14. Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA. The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46: 153–162.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Kopple JD, Greene T, Chumlea WC, Hollinger D, Maroni BJ, Merrill D, Scherch LK, Schulman G, Wang SR, Zimmer GS. Relationship between nutritional status and the glomerular filtration rate: results from the MDRD study. Kidney Int. 2000; 57: 1688–1703.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Collins T, Petersen N, Suarez-Almazor M, Ashton C. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in a racially diverse population. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 1469–1474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Emanuele MA, Buchanan BJ, Abraira C. Elevated leg systolic pressures and arterial calcification in diabetic occlusive vascular disease. Diabetes Care. 1981; 4: 289–292.[Abstract]

18. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Murphy WR, Olin JW, Puschett JB, Rosenfield KA, Sacks D, Stanley JC, Taylor LM, White CJ, White J, White RA, Antman EM, Smith SC, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Reigel B. ACC/AHA 2005 practice guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic). Circulation. 2006; 113: e463–e654.[Free Full Text]

19. O'Hare A, Johansen K. Lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease among patients with end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001; 12: 2838–2847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Resnick HE, Lindsay RS, McDermott MM, Devereux RB, Jones KL, Fabsitz RR, Howard BV. Relationship of high and low ankle brachial index to all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: the Strong Heart Study. Circulation. 2004; 109: 733–739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Kiel DP, Kauppila LI, Cupples LA, Hannan MT, O'Donnell CJ, Wilson PW. Bone loss and the progression of abdominal aortic calcification over a 25 year period: the Framingham Heart Study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2001; 68: 271–276.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Farhat GN, Strotmeyer ES, Newman AB, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Bauer DC, Harris T, Johnson KC, Taaffe DR, Cauley JA. Volumetric and areal bone mineral density measures are associated with cardiovascular disease in older men and women: the health, aging, and body composition study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2006; 79: 102–111.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. van der KM, Pols HA, Hak AE, Witteman JC, Hofman A, de Laet CE. Bone mineral density and the risk of peripheral arterial disease: the Rotterdam Study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002; 70: 443–449.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Wong SY, Kwok T, Woo J, Lynn H, Griffith JF, Leung J, Tang YY, Leung PC. Bone mineral density and the risk of peripheral arterial disease in men and women: results from Mr and Ms Os, Hong Kong. Osteoporos Int. 2005; 16: 1933–1938.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Hak AE, Pols HA, van Hemert AM, Hofman A, Witteman JC. Progression of aortic calcification is associated with metacarpal bone loss during menopause: a population-based longitudinal study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 1926–1931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Tanko LB, Bagger YZ, Christiansen C. Low bone mineral density in the hip as a marker of advanced atherosclerosis in elderly women. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003; 73: 15–20.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Barengolts EI, Berman M, Kukreja SC, Kouznetsova T, Lin C, Chomka EV. Osteoporosis and coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int. 1998; 62: 209–213.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Eason SL, Petersen NJ, Suarez-Almazor M, Davis B, Collins TC. Diabetes mellitus, smoking, and the risk for asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease: whom should we screen? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005; 18: 355–361.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Ishida H, Seino Y, Matsukura S, Ikeda M, Yawata M, Yamashita G, Ishizuka S, Imura H. Diabetic osteopenia and circulating levels of vitamin D metabolites in type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetes. Metabolism. 1985; 34: 797–801.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Levin ME, Boisseau VC, Avioli LV. Effects of diabetes mellitus on bone mass in juvenile and adult-onset diabetes. N Engl J Med. 1976; 294: 241–245.[Abstract]

31. Ottenbacher KJ, Ostir GV, Peek MK, Goodwin JS, Markides KS. Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for hip fracture in Mexican American older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002; 57: M648–M653.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Shao JS, Cai J, Towler DA. Molecular mechanisms of vascular calcification: lessons learned from the aorta. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 1423–1430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Towler DA, Shao JS, Cheng SL, Pingsterhaus JM, Loewy AP. Osteogenic regulation of vascular calcification. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1068: 327–333.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Vattikuti R, Towler DA. Osteogenic regulation of vascular calcification: an early perspective. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 286: E686–E696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Collins TC, Beyth RJ, Nelson DB, Petersen NJ, Suarez-Almazor ME, Bush RL, Hirsch AT, Ashton CM. Process of care and outcomes in patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22: 942–948.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Collins T, Johnson M, Henderson W, Khuri S, Daley J. Lower extremity non-traumatic amputation among veterans with peripheral arterial disease: is race an independent factor? Med Care. 2002; 40 (suppl): I-106–I-116.

37. Ensrud KE, Lui LY, Taylor BC, Ishani A, Shlipak MG, Stone KL, Cauley JA, Jamal SA, Antoniucci DM, Cummings SR. Renal function and risk of hip and vertebral fractures in older women. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 133–139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Ishani A, Paudel M, Taylor BC, Barrett-Connor E, Jamal S, Canales M, Steffes M, Fink HA, Orwoll E, Cummings SR, Ensrud KE. Renal function and rate of hip bone loss in older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. Osteoporos Int. 2008; 19: 1549–1556.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. McDermott MM, Greenland P, Green D, Guralnik JM, Criqui MH, Liu K, Chan C, Pearce WH, Taylor L, Ridker PM, Schneider JR, Martin G, Rifai N, Quann M, Fornage M. D-dimer, inflammatory markers, and lower extremity functioning in patients with and without peripheral arterial disease. Circulation. 2003; 107: 3191–3198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. McDermott MM, Guralnik JM, Corsi A, Albay M, Macchi C, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L. Patterns of inflammation associated with peripheral arterial disease: the InCHIANTI study. Am Heart J. 2005; 150: 276–281.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Ridker P, Cushman M, Stampfer M, Tracy R, Hennekens C. Plasma concentrations of C-reactive protein and risk of developing peripheral vascular disease. Circulation. 1998; 97: 425–428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Cauley JA, Danielson ME, Boudreau RM, Forrest KY, Zmuda JM, Pahor M, Tylavsky FA, Cummings SR, Harris TB, Newman AB. Inflammatory markers and incident fracture risk in older men and women: the Health Aging and Body Composition Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2007; 22: 1088–1095.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Ding C, Parameswaran V, Udayan R, Burgess J, Jones G. Circulating levels of inflammatory markers predict change in bone mineral density and resorption in older adults: a longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008; 93: 1952–1958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. McLean RR, Jacques PF, Selhub J, Tucker KL, Samelson EJ, Broe KE, Hannan MT, Cupples LA, Kiel DP. Homocysteine as a predictive factor for hip fracture in older persons. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 2042–2049.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Miyao M, Hosoi T, Inoue S, Shiraki M, Ouchi Y. Possible involvement of increasing plasma homocysteine level in the age dependent bone loss. J Bone Miner Res. 2000; 15: S459.

46. Schett G, Kiechl S, Weger S, Pederiva A, Mayr A, Petrangeli M, Oberhollenzer F, Lorenzini R, Redlich K, Axmann R, Zwerina J, Willeit J. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and risk of nontraumatic fractures in the Bruneck study. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166: 2495–2501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. van Meurs JB, Dhonukshe-Rutten RA, Pluijm SM, van der Klift M, Lindemans J, de Groot LC, Hofman A, Witteman JC, van Leeuwen JP, Breteler MM, Lips P, Pols HA, Uitterlinden AG. Homocysteine levels and the risk of osteoporotic fracture. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 2033–2041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Bakhireva LN, Barrett-Connor EL, Laughlin GA, Kritz-Silverstein D. Differences in association of bone mineral density with coronary artery calcification in men and women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. Menopause. 2005; 12: 691–698.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

49. Shen H, Bielak LF, Streeten EA, Ryan KA, Rumberger JA, Sheedy PF, Shuldiner AR, Peyser PA, Mitchell BD. Relationship between vascular calcification and bone mineral density in the old-order Amish. Calcif Tissue Int. 2007; 80: 244–250.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Fractures related to osteoporosis and peripheral arterial disease are major causes of morbidity and mortality in older people. Previous large observational studies have provided evidence of an association between bone loss and either incident cardiovascular disease or subclinical atherosclerosis. Evidence also exists to support an association between atherosclerosis of peripheral vessels and osteoporosis. Using the ankle-brachial index and initial and repeat hip bone mineral density in a cohort of community-dwelling men 65 years of age and older in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Older Men (MrOS) study, we found that men with peripheral arterial disease have higher rates of hip bone loss and an increased risk of nonspine fractures. These findings suggest that peripheral arterial disease should be added to the list of secondary medical conditions that are associated with a greater likelihood of higher rates of bone loss and fracture among older people. Future research should examine potential biological mechanisms underlying this association.


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 119: 2295-2296. [Extract] [Full Text]




This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
119/17/2305    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.820993v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, T. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Hip Injuries and Disorders
*Hip Replacement
*Osteoporosis
*Peripheral Arterial Disease
Related Collections
Right arrow Peripheral vascular disease
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrowRelated Article