doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.765289
(Circulation. 2008;118:410-421.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
New Drugs and Technologies |
Arginine Vasopressin Antagonists for the Treatment of Heart Failure and Hyponatremia
From the Division of Cardiology and Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to James E. Udelson, MD, Box 70, Tufts Medical Center Division of Cardiology, 50 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111. E-mail Judelson{at}tuftsmedicalcenter.org
Key Words: heart failure • hormones • kidney • receptors
 |
Introduction |
|---|
 Top Introduction The Role of Vasopressin...Vasopressin Antagonists in...Clinical Trials of Vasopressin...Effects on Renal FunctionAdverse EffectsFuture DirectionsConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Arginine vasopressin has attracted attention as a potentially important neurohormonal mediator of the heart failure (HF) syndrome and hyponatremic states in humans1 because vasopressin influences renal handling of free water, vasoconstriction, and myocyte biology.2,3 Several vasopressin antagonists are under development,4 and one of these agents, conivaptan, recently received US Food and Drug Administration approval for short-term intravenous treatment in patients with euvolemic or hypervolemic hyponatremia.
|
The Role of Vasopressin in HF and Hyponatremia |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe Role of Vasopressin...Vasopressin Antagonists in...Clinical Trials of Vasopressin...Effects on Renal FunctionAdverse EffectsFuture DirectionsConclusionsReferences |
|---|
A neurohypophysial hormone, vasopressin (also called antidiuretic hormone [ADH]), affects free water reabsorption by the kidney, body fluid osmolality, blood volume, vasoconstriction, and myocardial contractile function.2,3 Vasopressin is synthesized by neurosecretory cells located predominantly in the supraoptic and paraventricular hypothalamic nuclei. These neurons have axons terminating in the neural lobe of the posterior pituitary (neurohypophysis) that release vasopressin and oxytocin.5
Physiology of Regulation of Vasopressin Release
Normally, the dominant stimulant for vasopressin release is a change in plasma tonicity, plasma volume depletion, or blood pressure, the last 2 mediated by arterial baroreceptors. Osmoreceptors in the anterior hypothalamus sense the increase in serum osmolality and stimulate secretion of vasopressin from the posterior pituitary. In an attempt to normalize plasma osmolality, vasopressin acts on the V2 renal receptors, increasing free water reabsorption by insertion of protein water channels, aquaporins, in the luminal membranes of the principal cells of the renal collecting ducts.6
Receptor/Effector Mechanisms
The 3 vasopressin receptor subtypes belong to a family of rhodopsin-like G-protein–coupled receptors.7 V1a (vascular) receptors are located on several cell types, including vascular smooth muscle cells and cardiomyocytes (Table 1), with effects on the maintenance and regulation of vascular tone and possibly myocardial function.3
|
V1b (pituitary) receptors are expressed on the surfaces of corticotrophic cells in the anterior pituitary and the pancreas and adrenal medulla (Table 1).5,8 V1a and V1b receptors are linked to the phosphatidylinositol and 1,2-diacylglycerol signaling pathway (Figure 1). Activation of the V1 receptors causes influx of extracellular calcium by an unknown mechanism. Protein kinase C and calcium/calmodulin-activated protein kinases phosphorylate cell type–specific proteins, leading to a range of cellular responses, including vasoconstriction, glycogenolysis, platelet aggregation, adrenocorticotrophic hormone release, and growth of vascular smooth muscle cells.5
|
V2 (renal) receptors, expressed on the basolateral membrane of the renal collecting ducts, mediate the antidiuretic effects of vasopressin. The intracellular effects of this receptor subtype are mediated by the adenylate cyclase signaling pathway (Figure 2). Intracellular events triggered by binding of vasopressin to the V2 receptor include increased de novo synthesis and "shuttling" of aquaporin 2 water channels (AQP-2) from cytoplasmic vesicles to the luminal surface of the renal collecting duct cells, where they are inserted into the cell membrane and facilitate water transport across the collecting duct cells (Figure 2).9,10
|
Evidence for Elevated Vasopressin Levels in HF and/or LV Dysfunction
In addition to plasma osmolality, nonosmotic factors such as intracardiac pressures, intraarterial pressures, angiotensin II, pain, and adrenergic (
2) central nervous stimuli potentially influence vasopressin secretion. In normal homeostasis, these nonosmotic mechanisms are thought to play only a minor role. However, in edematous states, there appears to be a shift in regulation toward relatively greater influence of the nonosmotic mechanisms.11 The response to osmotic changes appears to occur at lower plasma osmolality levels in edematous states and is more pronounced, as demonstrated by a greater increment of vasopressin levels in patients with HF compared with non-HF subjects after an osmotic load of mannitol.11
Several studies have shown a significant elevation in mean values of plasma vasopressin in populations of patients with HF and/or LV dysfunction.4,12–14 In the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD),14 patients with asymptomatic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction had higher mean vasopressin levels compared with a control group. Patients with mild to moderate symptomatic HF had even higher mean levels than their asymptomatic counterparts. Wide variability in vasopressin levels exists among individual patients and across studies, and not all HF patients in these studies demonstrate elevated levels compared with normal referents. However, these "normal" vasopressin levels may be inappropriately elevated in HF relative to the state of expanded plasma volume or diminished plasma osmolality, although studies are not often analyzed as such.15 Table 2 summarizes the extant published literature reporting vasopressin levels in patients with HF and/or LV dysfunction.11–23
|
Hemodynamic Effects of Vasopressin
The vasoconstrictive effects of vasopressin are not thought to be associated with appreciable changes in arterial blood pressure at plasma levels within physiological range.24 However, in patients with HF, infusion of vasopressin increases systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increase, whereas stroke volume and cardiac output decrease with dose-dependent increases in vasopressin infusion.25 These hemodynamic effects are thought to be mediated primarily by activation of V1a receptors.16,26
Evidence supporting the concept that vasopressin mediates some degree of hemodynamically unfavorable effects in the setting of HF comes from data using selective V1a receptor antagonists in vivo,15 where significant improvements in systemic vascular resistance and cardiac output were observed in humans after vasopressin antagonism but only when vasopressin levels were elevated. Similar findings have been reported in animal models.27,28
Vasopressin Effects on Myocyte Biology
In neonatal rat myocardial cells, cellular hypertrophy by means of enhanced protein synthesis has been observed as a result of vasopressin receptor stimulation.29,30 By means of exposure to V1a receptor antagonists, the observed hypertrophy was significantly inhibited.29,30 Myocardial V1a receptor agonism results in an increase in intracellular calcium concentration, causing activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and protein kinase C,29–31 thought to be central in mediating the observed hypertrophic myocardial cell growth. In these experiments, vasopressin inhibition with an agent acting at both the V1a and V2 receptors inhibited the activity of mitogen-activated protein kinase on rat cardiac myocytes.
Vasopressin Role in Water Balance and Hyponatremia
Vasopressin directly alters sodium concentration and water balance by stimulating the renal V2 receptors through increased expression of AQP-2 inserted into the cell membranes of the principal cells of the renal collecting ducts, facilitating free water absorption and a subsequent decrease in sodium serum levels.
Elevated plasma vasopressin concentrations appear to be associated with impaired solute-free water excretion in the setting of HF.9,10 Rats with an elevated LV end-diastolic pressure and reduced plasma sodium had significantly increased expression of AQP-2 mRNA compared with rats with compensated HF.32
In this regard, specific antagonism of the vasopressin V2 receptor results in a potent aquaresis in dogs and rats.33 In humans, V2 receptor antagonism results in a dose-related increase in solute-free water excretion and elevation of serum sodium concentration and serum osmolality in patients with HF.22,34,35 In 1 study, an observed reduction in urinary AQP-2 protein levels suggested that aquaresis was associated with a reduction in AQP-2 expression at the level of the renal collecting duct.36
Moreover, as discussed further below, vasopressin antagonism at the level of the V2 receptor has been consistently associated with an improvement in serum sodium levels among patients with hyponatremia of multiple causes.37–40
|
Vasopressin Antagonists in Development |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe Role of Vasopressin...Vasopressin Antagonists in...Clinical Trials of Vasopressin...Effects on Renal FunctionAdverse EffectsFuture DirectionsConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Several vasopressin antagonists are in various stages of clinical trials for treating hyponatremia and/or HF. These agents differ on the basis of their degree of specificity for the V1a and V2 receptors (Table 3).4,41–43
|
Conivaptan is a nonpeptide vasopressin antagonist with a high affinity for both V1a and V2 receptors. Conivaptan has been administered by oral and intravenous routes,44 although the clinical development and recent US Food and Drug Administration approval involve only the intravenous formulation. The effects of conivaptan on urinary parameters in rat models have included an increase in both urine volume and sodium concentration compared with placebo.45 Decreased intracellular free calcium and mitogen-activated protein kinase activity were observed to occur in a dose-dependent manner,29,30 suggesting a reduction in intracellular protein synthesis and possibly cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Thus, in animal models, inhibition of both V1a and V2 vasopressin receptors may play a beneficial role in HF.
Tolvaptan, a selective nonpeptide V2 receptor antagonist, has potent aquaretic properties in animal models.46,47 In cloned human receptors, the V2:V1a receptor selectivity was 29:1.47 Dose-dependent responses demonstrated in rats include increased free water clearance, less urinary loss of sodium than furosemide, and no effect on serum creatinine.46 Compared with furosemide, serum sodium increased in a dose-dependent fashion in animals given tolvaptan.46 Unlike the administration of loop diuretics, antagonism of V2 receptors appeared not to increase activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.46
Lixivaptan is a nonpeptide, highly specific antagonist of the V2 receptor. The binding affinity of lixivaptan for V2 receptors is 
100 times greater than for V1 receptors.2 Dose-dependent increases in urine output and solute-free water clearance and increased serum sodium concentration have been demonstrated in preliminary human studies of single doses of lixivaptan administered to patients with New York Heart Association class II and III HF.34
Satavaptan is highly specific for the V2 receptor, has a long half-life, and is under development for the treatment of hyponatremia in the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of ADH (SIADH) and cirrhosis.41
|
Clinical Trials of Vasopressin Receptor Antagonists |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe Role of Vasopressin...Vasopressin Antagonists in...Clinical Trials of Vasopressin...Effects on Renal FunctionAdverse EffectsFuture DirectionsConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Trials in Hyponatremia
Hyponatremia is challenging to treat, with current approaches having significant limitations. Antagonism of vasopressin action at its receptor is attractive as an approach that directly addresses the pathophysiology. Table 4 summarizes the trials that have investigated the use of vasopressin antagonists in patients with hyponatremia of multiple origins.37,39,40,41,48
|
Two recently completed trials, Study of Ascending Levels of Tolvaptan in Hyponatremia (SALT)-1 and SALT-2, investigated the effects of tolvaptan on serum sodium levels in patients with euvolemic or hypervolemic hyponatremia associated with HF, cirrhosis, or SIADH. This double-blind multicenter trial randomized 223 patients to placebo and 225 patients to tolvaptan at an initial dose of 15 mg daily. Dosing of tolvaptan (or matching placebo) was increased to 30 mg and then to 60 mg daily if sodium levels were not responding. Patients receiving tolvaptan had highly significant increases in serum sodium concentration at days 4 and 30. In the week after discontinuation of tolvaptan at day 30, hyponatremia recurred.37 In a prespecified analysis examining a patient-reported health status measure, tolvaptan had a favorable effect compared with placebo on the Mental Component Summary of the Short Form-12 Health Survey, particularly in patients with more severe hyponatremia.37
Of note, patients in the SALT trials were not fluid restricted; however, in 1 smaller study compared with placebo plus fluid restriction, tolvaptan appeared to be more effective at correcting hyponatremia in hospitalized patients.49
Lixivaptan also has been evaluated in 44 patients with hyponatremia from cirrhosis, HF, or SIADH receiving doses of 25, 125, or 250 mg orally twice daily for 7 days.40 The observed effects included an aquaretic response compared with placebo, with dose-related increases in free water clearance and serum sodium and without changes in orthostatic blood pressure or serum creatinine. Although effective at lower doses, the higher dose (250 mg) resulted in significant volume depletion requiring withholding of doses in 50% of patients.
Conivaptan has been studied for short-term intravenous treatment of euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia and has recently achieved US Food and Drug Administration approval for this indication. The data that formed the basis for approval were published by Zeltser et al,39 who randomized 84 hospitalized patients with either euvolemic or hypervolemic hyponatremia (defined by serum sodium concentrations between 115 and 130 mEq/L) to receive a 20-mg loading dose of conivaptan over 30 minutes followed by a 4-day infusion at either 40 or 80 mg/d or to receive placebo loading and infusion. Conivaptan resulted in a significant increase in serum sodium of 6.3±0.7 mEq/L in the 40-mg/d group and an increase of 9.4 mEq/L in the 80-mg/d group.39 The rate of correction of serum sodium was within safe limits without evidence of excessive hypernatremia or feared complications of central pontine myelinolysis from too-rapid correction of serum sodium. Compared with placebo, the incidence of death, serious side effects, and discontinuations of treatment for any reason were not in excess compared with placebo. However, an increased incidence of adverse effects in dose-related infusion-site reactions was present among patients receiving conivaptan versus those receiving placebo.39
Satavaptan is highly specific for the V2 receptor and has the longest half-life (14 to 17 hours) of the agents studied so far. A trial of 34 patients with SIADH showed significant correction of hyponatremia after doses of either 25 or 50 mg versus placebo.41 In the long-term open-label extension of the trial, satavaptan demonstrated safety without adverse events over a 12-month period.
A larger trial in 110 cirrhotics with ascites and hyponatremia demonstrated improvement in serum sodium levels and ascites control.48 This multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial compared 3 oral doses (5, 12.5, or 25 mg once daily) compared with placebo, in addition to spironolactone 100 mg daily for 14 days. A dose-dependent improvement in ascites was found with satavaptan, as indicated by a reduction in body weight and abdominal girth, as well as an improvement in serum sodium.48
Overall, the data surrounding tolvaptan, lixivaptan, conivaptan, and satavaptan have been consistent in demonstrating favorable effects on serum sodium among patients with hyponatremia of various causes but not in demonstrating effects on overall or disease-specific mortality. An effect in the tolvaptan trials has been seen on symptoms as reflected by the Mental Component Summary of the Short Form-12 Health Survey.37
HF With Hyponatremia
The presence of hyponatremia in the setting of volume overload and HF creates substantial management challenges. Treatment of the volume-overload state with loop diuretics can exacerbate the free water excess and result in maintaining or even worsening of the magnitude of hyponatremia. The presence of hyponatremia in patients admitted for HF exacerbation regardless of systolic dysfunction, even mild hyponatremia, portends a worse prognosis, as many trial registries (Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of Heart Failure [OPTIMIZE-HF], Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of Chronic Heart Failure [OPTIME-CHF], Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness [ESCAPE]) have demonstrated.50–52 Because such patients are thought to have vasopressin excess contributing to the pathophysiology, the potential use of vasopressin antagonists in this setting is attractive.
In a double-blind study conducted in 254 stable chronic HF patients (regardless of LV ejection fraction), 3 oral doses of tolvaptan (30, 45, or 60 mg) given daily for 25 days were compared with placebo administration.38 Throughout the full course of therapy, a significant decrease in body weight and edema was observed, as was an increased urinary volume. Seventy of the 254 patients (28%) had hyponatremia at baseline, defined in this study as serum sodium <136 mEq/L. In these patients, tolvaptan at all doses was associated with normalization of the mean serum sodium levels in the treated patients for the entire duration of the study period in the absence of fluid restriction, although in this study the effect of tolvaptan on hyponatremia was not a primary study objective. Normalization of hyponatremia occurred in 82% of the treated patients even on day 1 compared with only 40% of placebo-treated patients, with similar findings observed on day 25.38
In the Acute and Chronic Therapeutic Impact of a Vasopressin 2 Antagonist (Tolvaptan) in Congestive Heart Failure (ACTIV in CHF) trial, which evaluated decompensated HF patients, 68 patients (21%) had hyponatremia (again defined as sodium level <136 mEq/L) at randomization. Serum sodium concentrations were observed to rise and often normalize in this cohort.53 Of interest, among these patients admitted to hospital with decompensated HF, those with hyponatremia had a very high mortality rate at 60 days.
In a subgroup analysis of the Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST) trial, 8% of enrolled patients with decompensated HF had significant hyponatremia, defined as serum sodium <134 mEq/L. In these hyponatremic patients, serum sodium increased 5.5 mEq/L in the tolvaptan-treated patients compared with an increase of 1.8 mEq/L in the placebo-treated patients, and the improvement in the tolvaptan-treated patients was maintained throughout the long-term course of therapy.54 However, as with the larger cohort, no mortality outcome benefit in this subgroup and no association of improved hyponatremia with better outcomes were seen.
The published trials38,53–55 (Table 5) demonstrate the benefit of vasopressin antagonists in terms of raising or normalizing sodium levels in hyponatremic HF patients, most performed even without fluid restriction. In 1 trial that compared fluid restriction and tolvaptan, a significant improvement in hyponatremia with tolvaptan was demonstrated.49
|
The use of vasopressin antagonists, addressing both the pathophysiological state of hyponatremia and the volume-overload state simultaneously, could become an important approach in this clinical setting for this challenging group of patients.
Decompensated HF
In the ACTIV in CHF trial, 3 oral, once-daily doses of tolvaptan (30, 60, or 90 mg) or placebo were administered to patients hospitalized with acute decompensated HF.53 Body weight decreased significantly from baseline in all tolvaptan-treated groups on day 1 after admission (a primary end point) compared with placebo and decreased further during the course of hospitalization. This effect was not dose dependent. Similarly, urine volume on day 1 was significantly higher in all groups treated with tolvaptan than in those treated with placebo.
No significant differences were observed in rates of rehospitalization over the 60-day follow-up period, although a trend toward greater survival was found in the tolvaptan groups compared with placebo. In posthoc subgroup analyses, patients with elevated blood urea nitrogen and those with multiple signs of congestion who were treated with tolvaptan experienced lower mortality rates out to 60 days. Although this study was not sufficiently powered nor designed to assess mortality, the results were provocative and supported the performance of a fully powered trial to assess these findings prospectively.
The EVEREST program evaluated short- and long-term end points among patients being admitted for acute decompensated HF, randomized to treatment with tolvaptan 30 mg daily in addition to routine standard care (including diuretics) or to placebo plus standard care,56 and followed up on continuing treatment with an assigned study drug after hospital discharge.54 The trial was structured so that the main trial incorporated 2 short-term trials of symptom assessment for the hospitalization period, whereas long-term morbidity and mortality outcome end points were assessed in the well-powered main trial over the longer follow-up period.57 The trial population sample size (ultimately 4133 patients) and duration of follow-up were event driven.
In the short-term trials, the primary end point was a composite of patient-assessed global clinical status (assessed as a visual analog score) and body weight reduction, both assessed at day 7 after randomization or at the time of discharge if earlier. This primary end point was positive in favor of treatment with tolvaptan, driven by the reductions in body weight beyond that achieved with standard therapy alone and not by changes in global clinical status because the scores were almost identical between the groups.
Numerous other secondary end points such as change in patient-assessed dyspnea at multiple time points were positively affected during tolvaptan treatment.56 On day 1, dyspnea improvement was reported, with the tolvaptan group improving 77% compared with 71% in the placebo in trial A and 72% versus 65% in trial B. Although these differences are modest, it is important to note that the changes were seen with study drug given in addition to all standard therapy.
The long-term follow-up trial was powered to assess coprimary end points of all-cause mortality (for either superiority or noninferiority) and cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization (for superiority). Over a median of 9.9 months of follow-up, no effect (neither favorable nor unfavorable) of tolvaptan was found compared with placebo on either of the main trial end points despite effective short-term reductions in postdischarge body weight and improved serum sodium levels in hyponatremic patients.54 No excess adverse effects on renal function, heart rate, blood pressure, and serum potassium were reported.
Both groups were on optimal medical therapy for HF, yet some benefit was observed in signs and symptoms of HF without the increased risks that can occur with some treatments for acute HF. Thus, although not ultimately affecting natural history after admission for decompensated HF in a favorable way, the long-term EVEREST follow-up has provided substantial safety information to guide clinicians’ potential treatment strategy for use in improving symptomatology.
Hence, the EVEREST data suggest that vasopressin antagonism in the setting of decompensated HF has potential benefit, including decreasing body weight by increasing urine output associated with improvement in dyspnea, without fostering abnormalities in electrolytes or renal function (as can be seen with more aggressive loop diuretic therapy) and normalizing serum sodium concentration in hyponatremic patients.
The intravenous form of conivaptan as a several-day infusion also has undergone investigation for potential use in acute decompensated HF. A dose-ranging pilot study assessing the efficacy and safety of intravenous conivaptan in patients with acute decompensated HF found that conivaptan significantly increased urine output, was hemodynamically well tolerated, and had minimal excess adverse effects. However, no apparent significant change in respiratory symptoms or body weight was found.58
Data on the use of vasopressin antagonism in the setting of acute decompensated HF (see Table 6)53,54,58 suggest that the reductions in body weight, increases in urine output incremental to that resulting from standard therapy, and potentially more rapid improvement in symptoms can be achieved safely. The trials in this area, particularly EVEREST, also highlight the challenges inherent in studying this syndrome. This trial was designed as a "one size fits all" approach with a fixed-dose protocol, although in clinical practice such an agent would likely be titrated on the basis of clinical effects. Moreover, a new treatment strategy must be compared with "standard therapy," ie, intravenous loop diuretics and other therapies, which are generally effective, so end points must be measured against a clinical background that is dynamic and usually improving with standard therapy, as seen in the placebo groups in trials such as Vasodilation in the Management of Acute Congestive Heart Failure (VMAC) and again in EVEREST.54,59 Symptom-based end points such as dyspnea are highly subjective and incorporate substantial variability in their measurement scales. In designing trials in this area, researchers must account for this variability and the effects of standard therapy when designing the analysis and calculating sample sizes.
|
A sign such as change in body weight, although accepted by clinicians, is not yet on solid regulatory footing by itself as a basis for approval of a new agent for this syndrome. Thus, in EVEREST, change in body weight was a component of a composite, along with a patient-assessed symptom end point. Significant lessons have been learned from trials in this area, including EVEREST, to inform the design of future studies.
Hemodynamics and Remodeling in Chronic HF
In a study of 142 patients with advanced HF with systolic dysfunction, conivaptan was administered as a single intravenous dose (10, 20, or 40 mg) and compared with placebo.22 Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was reduced, although modestly, and right atrial pressure was significantly reduced after drug administration in the 20- and 40-mg conivaptan groups compared with placebo without a significant change in cardiac index, pulmonary artery pressures, systemic or pulmonary vascular resistance, systemic arterial pressure, or heart rate. Urine output in the conivaptan-treated group demonstrated a dose-dependent increase that peaked 2 to 3 hours after dosing. Urine osmolality was significantly reduced by all doses of conivaptan. Of interest, no correlation could be established between conivaptan effects and baseline vasopressin or serum sodium levels.
Similar hemodynamic and urine output data have recently been presented in a dose-ranging, singe-dose administration study of tolvaptan35 in which modest reductions in wedge pressure and dose-dependent increases in urine output were observed. This increase in aquaresis may have been facilitated by the increase in serum osmolality seen in this study.
The data from these studies suggest that vasopressin receptor antagonism in patients with stable advanced HF (see Table 7)23,60–62 has favorable hemodynamic effects (with initial dosing), possibly mediated via increased urine output. The generally similar results noted for hemodynamics and urine output with single-dose studies of both conivaptan and tolvaptan suggest that the predominant effect of vasopressin receptor antagonism in these studies involves effects at the V2 receptor.
|
A preliminary study of oral conivaptan treatment for several months that examined the effects on exercise tolerance and functional capacity in stable HF patients demonstrated neutral results.60 Thus, the role of these agents in affecting clinical symptoms in patients with initially stable HF is uncertain at this time.
The effect of vasopressin receptor antagonism with tolvaptan on LV remodeling was evaluated in the Multicenter Evaluation of Tolvaptan Effect on Remodeling (METEOR) trial in 240 patients with chronic HF and systolic dysfunction and signs of volume excess.23 In this patient sample with very high use of evidence-based background HF therapies (>90% use of both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, as well as β-blockers), the primary end point, mean LV end-diastolic volume index (by quantitative radionuclide ventriculography), was unchanged over 1 year of follow-up in the tolvaptan-treated group compared with the placebo group. Although the results of the METEOR trial established that vasopressin antagonism (with a V2 receptor–specific agent) had no incremental benefit on remodeling over 1 year of therapy, the data indirectly addressed a potential issue with regard to long-term treatment. It had been suggested that long-term treatment with an agent more specific for the V2 vasopressin receptor may have unfavorable effects resulting from the unopposed vasopressin V1 receptor stimulation because vasopressin levels may rise during receptor antagonist therapy.63 The absence of any unfavorable effect on remodeling during long-term V2 receptor antagonism in the METEOR trial and the safety data accumulated in the EVEREST study suggest that if any such unfavorable effects exist, that they are not easily measurable.
In patients with stable chronic HF, highly specific V2 receptor antagonism with lixivaptan has been studied in a dose-ranging trial. Dose-dependent increases in urine output, solute-free water clearance, and serum sodium concentration have been demonstrated in a preliminary study of single doses of 10, 30, 75, 150, 250, and 400 mg lixivaptan administered to patients with New York Heart Association class II and III HF.34 End points were measured after 4 hours of fluid restriction followed by another 20 hours of liberal fluid intake. Significant dose-related increases in urinary flow were observed after 4 hours for all doses of lixivaptan >10 mg compared with placebo. Clinical data on chronic HF management are limited to this small study for lixivaptan, and data from trials using conivaptan have not been published.
Given the consistent increases in urine output seen with all agents in this class, it could be postulated that the administration of vasopressin receptor antagonists might allow "sparing" of loop diuretic dose. This concept was evaluated in a preliminary study in which patients with chronic HF and signs of congestion were withdrawn from background diuretic therapy, salt restricted, and randomized to short-term treatment with tolvaptan as monotherapy (30 mg/d), furosemide monotherapy (80 mg/d), or a combination for 7 days.61 Tolvaptan-treated patients demonstrated a significant decline in body weight and increase in urine output compared with furosemide alone without altering serum potassium. Results of studies such as this must be interpreted keeping in mind that furosemide lasts only 6 hours; thus, once-daily diuretic dosing leaves 18 hours per day of compensation for sodium and water loss in the first 6 hours. However, these preliminary data suggest that vasopressin receptor antagonism in HF patients who are stable on once-daily furosemide dosing may allow reduction or even discontinuation of loop diuretics in some cases, a finding that should be evaluated in future studies.
|
Effects on Renal Function |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe Role of Vasopressin...Vasopressin Antagonists in...Clinical Trials of Vasopressin...Effects on Renal FunctionAdverse EffectsFuture DirectionsConclusionsReferences |
|---|
In contrast to the administration of loop diuretics, antagonism of vasopressin receptors appears not to increase activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and the increase in urine output without changes in systemic vascular resistance and cardiac output observed in the short-term studies suggests that volume reduction may be achieved with less effect on renal function than seen with loop diuretics. In many studies of patients with decompensated HF, higher-dose loop diuretic therapy is associated with unfavorable outcomes, as is worsening renal function during the course of therapy.64,65
One possible explanation for why the neurohormonal axis is apparently activated less23,61 with V2 receptor antagonists than loop diuretics despite the same volume of urine losses is that extracellular fluid is depleted less. With V2 receptor antagonists, solute-free urinary losses come from intracellular fluid (two thirds) and extracellular fluid (one third), whereas sodium loss from furosemide is exclusively via extracellular fluid. Thus, the impact on extracellular fluid is significantly greater with loop diuretic use, which in turn has greater potential effects on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.
In an open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-dose crossover study in patients with mild to moderate chronic HF designed to assess the effects of tolvaptan and furosemide on renal function and renal hemodynamics,62 tolvaptan was found to increase urine output and renal blood flow. In comparison, furosemide increased urine output to a comparable degree but at the expense of electrolyte excretion (urinary sodium and potassium) and renal blood flow. Tolvaptan, furosemide, and placebo did not differ in respect to mean arterial pressure, glomerular filtration rate, or serum sodium and potassium.62 In EVEREST, at day 7 or day of discharge, a very slight but significantly higher serum creatinine level but a lower serum urea nitrogen level was found in the tolvaptan compared with the placebo group. This difference was observed at many long-term follow-up points through 56 weeks after discharge.54
In published studies to date,54,56 no significant adverse effects on renal function or electrolyte status have been noted. All of these results support the possibility that vasopressin receptor antagonism may be associated with preserved renal function in HF patients while promoting volume loss and relief of congestion.
|
Adverse Effects |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe Role of Vasopressin...Vasopressin Antagonists in...Clinical Trials of Vasopressin...Effects on Renal FunctionAdverse EffectsFuture DirectionsConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Vasopressin antagonists used in the published trials have generally been well tolerated. An increase in thirst and dry mouth has consistently been reported in patients treated with vasopressin antagonists compared with placebo. In EVEREST, no difference was observed in major adverse events between the 2 randomized groups.54 Among numerous side effects and safety parameters examined in EVEREST, the largest database, a small but significant apparent increase in the risk of reported stroke was found, plus a small but significant reduction in the risk of reported myocardial infarction of similar magnitude.56 Hypotension has not occurred in excess relative to placebo. Hypokalemia was seen during long-term treatment in 8% of patients in EVEREST treated with tolvaptan and in 9.8% of placebo-treated patients, whereas hypernatremia occurred in 1.7% of tolvaptan-treated patients compared with 0.5% of placebo-treated patients. It has been a general finding in the vasopressin antagonist studies that serum sodium in normonatremic patients may rise
3 mEq/L during initial therapy and then return to baseline after several days.38 Thus, substantial published data, especially with V2 receptor antagonism as reported in EVEREST, have established a safety profile for this treatment approach.
|
Future Directions |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe Role of Vasopressin...Vasopressin Antagonists in...Clinical Trials of Vasopressin...Effects on Renal FunctionAdverse EffectsFuture DirectionsConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Other potential clinical uses for vasopressin antagonists are currently being explored, one of which is treatment for patients with polycystic kidney disease because vasopressin V2 receptors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cyst formation and enlargement in polycystic kidney disease. Tolvaptan is being evaluated in a multicenter trial in patients with autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease that is examining the rate of renal volume change.66
Many unanswered questions remain on the potential use of vasopressin antagonists with regard to HF. Such questions include the potential efficacy of longer-term treatment with nonselective receptor antagonism, the use in volume overload associated with HF in the setting of preserved ejection fraction with a nondilated ventricle, the impact of potential sparing of loop diuretic dosing, the duration of therapy in terms of need for short-term versus longer-term treatment, and dose-adjustment strategies.
|
Conclusions |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe Role of Vasopressin...Vasopressin Antagonists in...Clinical Trials of Vasopressin...Effects on Renal FunctionAdverse EffectsFuture DirectionsConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Despite advances in neurohormonal antagonist therapies,67 HF patients continue to progress to more advanced stages of the HF syndrome, continue to be hospitalized for decompensation, and die at an unacceptable rate. This has spurred translational and clinical investigation into blockade of additional neurohormonal systems. Somewhat unexpectedly, many contemporary neurohormonal antagonist trials investigating approaches such as endothelin receptor blockade68 and cytokine inhibition69 have shown neutral or unfavorable results. In this light, the "vaptan" class of vasopressin receptor antagonists has shown promising results for the treatment of hyponatremia, for decompensated HF, and for HF complicated by hyponatremia. Improvement in serum sodium in patients with hyponatremia of several causes has consistently been documented with an acceptable safety profile. At the time of this writing, intravenous conivaptan has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the short-term treatment of euvolemic or hypovolemic hyponatremia. In HF, consistent increases in urine output, a reduction in body weight, and an improvement in many signs and symptoms have been seen without unfavorable changes in blood pressure, heart rate, electrolytes, or renal function. Pivotal trials of oral tolvaptan in the setting of decompensated HF and hyponatremia have been completed, and pivotal trials of lixivaptan for hyponatremia of multiple causes and HF complicated by hyponatremia are underway. Treatment of polycystic kidney disease also is being evaluated.
Thus far, therapeutic use of vasopressin antagonists has safely and effectively been shown to reduce body weight in decompensated HF and to normalize sodium levels in hyponatremic patients. In HF, an ideal agent would improve both symptoms and long-term outcomes, and from this perspective, the neutral long-term outcome effects of tolvaptan can be thought of as disappointing. Nevertheless, the data from EVEREST, SALT-1, and SALT-2 plus the conivaptan data suggest that vasopressin antagonism may become a useful tool for clinicians in specific situations such as decompensated HF with volume overload and is potentially an important therapy in setting of HF with hyponatremia and for hyponatremia of any cause when improvement in serum sodium is a clinical goal.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Disclosures
Drs Konstam and Udelson have received consulting income and research support from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization Inc and from Cardiokine Inc. Dr Udelson has received consulting income from Astellas. Dr Finley reports no conflicts.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopIntroductionThe Role of Vasopressin...Vasopressin Antagonists in...Clinical Trials of Vasopressin...Effects on Renal FunctionAdverse EffectsFuture DirectionsConclusionsReferences |
|---|
1. Schrier RW, Abraham WT. Hormones and hemodynamics in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 577–585.
2. Thibonnier M. Vasopressin receptor antagonists in heart failure. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2003; 3: 683–687.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Penit J, Faure M, Jard S. Vasopressin and angiotensin II receptors in rat aortic smooth muscle cells in culture. Am J Physiol. 1983; 244: E72–E82.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Lee CR, Watkins ML, Patterson JH, Gattis W, O'connor CM, Gheorghiade M, Adams KF Jr. Vasopressin: a new target for the treatment of heart failure. Am Heart J. 2003; 146: 9–18.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Bankir L. Antidiuretic action of vasopressin: quantitative aspects and interaction between V1a and V2 receptor-mediated effects. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 51: 372–390.
6. Ganong WF. Review of Medical Physiology. 10th ed. Los Altos, Calif: Lange Medical Publications; 1981.
7. Carmichael MC, Kumar R. Molecular biology of vasopressin receptors. Semin Nephrol. 1994; 14: 341–348.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Jackson EK. Vasopressin and other agents affecting the renal conservation of water. In: Goodman LS, Gilman A, Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parker KL, eds. Goodman & Gilman’s the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 11th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2006: 2021.
9. Nielsen S, Chou CL, Marples D, Christensen EI, Kishore BK, Knepper MA. Vasopressin increases water permeability of kidney collecting duct by inducing translocation of aquaporin-CD water channels to plasma membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995; 92: 1013–1017.
10. Kalra PR, Anker SD, Coats AJ. Water and sodium regulation in chronic heart failure: the role of natriuretic peptides and vasopressin. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 51: 495–509.
11. Uretsky BF, Verbalis JG, Generalovich T, Valdes A, Reddy PS. Plasma vasopressin response to osmotic and hemodynamic stimuli in heart failure. Am J Physiol. 1985; 248: H396–H402.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Goldsmith SR, Francis GS, Cowley AW Jr, Levine TB, Cohn JN. Increased plasma arginine vasopressin levels in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983; 1: 1385–1390.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Szatalowicz VL, Arnold PE, Chaimovitz C, Bichet D, Berl T, Schrier RW. Radioimmunoassay of plasma arginine vasopressin in hyponatremic patients with congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1981; 305: 263–266.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Francis GS, Benedict C, Johnstone DE, Kirlin PC, Nicklas J, Liang CS, Kubo SH, Rudin-Toretsky E, Yusuf S. Comparison of neuroendocrine activation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure: a substudy of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Circulation. 1990; 82: 1724–1729.
15. Kramer BK, Schweda F, Riegger GA. Diuretic treatment and diuretic resistance in heart failure. Am J Med. 1999; 106: 90–96.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Creager MA, Faxon DP, Cutler SS, Kohlmann O, Ryan TJ, Gavras H. Contribution of vasopressin to vasoconstriction in patients with congestive heart failure: comparison with the renin-angiotensin system and the sympathetic nervous system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986; 7: 758–765.[Abstract]
17. Nicod P, Waeber B, Bussien JP, Goy JJ, Turini G, Nussberger J, Hofbauer KG, Brunner HR. Acute hemodynamic effect of a vascular antagonist of vasopressin in patients with congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1985; 55: 1043–1047.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Pruszczynski W, Vahanian A, Ardaillou R, Acar J. Role of antidiuretic hormone in impaired water excretion of patients with congestive heart failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984; 58: 599–605.
19. Goldsmith SR, Francis GS, Levine TB, Cowley AW Jr, Cohn JN. Impaired response of plasma vasopressin to orthostatic stress in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983; 2: 1080–1083.[Abstract]
20. Rouleau JL, de Champlain J, Klein M, Bichet D, Moye L, Packer M, Dagenais GR, Sussex B, Arnold JM, Sestier F. Activation of neurohumoral systems in postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 390–398.[Abstract]
21. Gavras H, Ribeiro AB, Kohlmann O, Saragoca M, Mulinari RA, Ramos O, Gavras I. Effects of a specific inhibitor of the vascular action of vasopressin in humans. Hypertension. 1984; 6 (suppl): I-156–I-60.
22. Udelson JE, Smith WB, Hendrix GH, Painchaud CA, Ghazzi M, Thomas I, Ghali JK, Selaru P, Chanoine F, Pressler ML, Konstam MA. Acute hemodynamic effects of conivaptan, a dual V(1A) and V(2) vasopressin receptor antagonist, in patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2417–2423.
23. Udelson JE, McGrew FA, Flores E, Ibrahim H, Katz S, Koshkarian G, O'Brien T, Kronenberg MW, Zimmer C, Orlandi C, Konstam MA. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effect of oral tolvaptan on left ventricular dilation and function in patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 2151–2159.
24. Goldsmith SR. Vasopressin as vasopressor. Am J Med. 1987; 82: 1213–1219.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Goldsmith SR, Francis GS, Cowley AW Jr, Goldenberg IF, Cohn JN. Hemodynamic effects of infused arginine vasopressin in congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986; 8: 779–783.[Abstract]
26. Monos E, Cox RH, Peterson LH. Direct effect of physiological doses of arginine vasopressin on the arterial wall in vivo. Am J Physiol. 1978; 234: H167–H172.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Naitoh M, Suzuki H, Murakami M, Matsumoto A, Arakawa K, Ichihara A, Nakamoto H, Oka K, Yamamura Y, Saruta T. Effects of oral AVP receptor antagonists OPC-21268 and OPC-31260 on congestive heart failure in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol. 1994; 267: H2245–H2254.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Clair MJ, King MK, Goldberg AT, Hendrick JW, Nisato R, Gay DM, Morrison AE, McElmurray JH 3rd, Krombach RS, Bond BR, Cazaubon C, Nisato D, Spinale FG. Selective vasopressin, angiotensin II, or dual receptor blockade with developing congestive heart failure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000; 293: 852–860.
29. Nakamura Y, Haneda T, Osaki J, Miyata S, Kikuchi K. Hypertrophic growth of cultured neonatal rat heart cells mediated by vasopressin V(1A) receptor. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000; 391: 39–48.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Tahara A, Tomura Y, Wada K, Kusayama T, Tsukada J, Ishii N, Yatsu T, Uchida W, Tanaka A. Effect of YM087, a potent nonpeptide vasopressin antagonist, on vasopressin-induced hyperplasia and hypertrophy of cultured vascular smooth-muscle cells. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1997; 30: 759–766.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Fukuzawa J, Haneda T, Kikuchi K. Arginine vasopressin increases the rate of protein synthesis in isolated perfused adult rat heart via the V1 receptor. Mol Cell Biochem. 1999; 195: 93–98.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Xu DL, Martin PY, Ohara M, St John J, Pattison T, Meng X, Morris K, Kim JK, Schrier RW. Upregulation of aquaporin-2 water channel expression in chronic heart failure rat. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 1500–1505.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Chan PS, Coupet J, Park HC, Lai F, Hartupee D, Cervoni P, Dusza JP, Albright JD, Ru X, Mazandarani H, Tanikella T, Shepherd C, Ochalski L, Bailey T, Lock TY, Ning X, Taylor JR, Spinelli W. VPA-985, a nonpeptide orally active and selective vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist. In: Zingg HH, Bourque CW, Bichet DG, eds. Vasopressin and Oxytocin: Molecular, Cellular, and Clinical Advances. New York, NY: Plenum; 1998; 449:439–443.Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology series.
34. Abraham WT, Shamshirsaz AA, McFann K, Oren RM, Schrier RW. Aquaretic effect of lixivaptan, an oral, non-peptide, selective V2 receptor vasopressin antagonist, in New York Heart Association functional class II and III chronic heart failure patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 1615–1621.
35. Udelson JE, Orlandi C, Ouyang J, Krasa H, Zimmer CA, Frivold G, Haught WH, Meymandi S, Wedge P, Konstam MA, Gheorghiade M. Acute hemodynamic effects of tolvaptan, a vasopressin V-2 receptor blocker, in patients with symptomatic heart failure and systolic dysfunction: the ECLIPSE international, multicenter, randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Card Fail. 13: 793–794.
36. Martin PY, Abraham WT, Lieming X, Olson BR, Oren RM, Ohara M, Schrier RW. Selective V2-receptor vasopressin antagonism decreases urinary aquaporin-2 excretion in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999; 10: 2165–2170.
37. Schrier RW, Gross P, Gheorghiade M, Berl T, Verbalis JG, Czerwiec FS, Orlandi C, SALT I. Tolvaptan, a selective oral vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist, for hyponatremia. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 2099–2112.
38. Gheorghiade M, Niazi I, Ouyang J, Czerwiec F, Kambayashi J, Zampino M, Orlandi C, Tolvaptan I. Vasopressin V2-receptor blockade with tolvaptan in patients with chronic heart failure: results from a double-blind, randomized trial. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2690–2696.
39. Zeltser D, Rosansky S, van Rensburg H, Verbalis JG, Smith N, for the Conivaptan Study Group. Assessment of the efficacy and safety of intravenous conivaptan in euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. Am J Nephrol. 2007; 27: 447–457.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Wong F, Blei AT, Blendis LM, Thuluvath PJ. A vasopressin receptor antagonist (VPA-985) improves serum sodium concentration in patients with hyponatremia: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Hepatology. 2003; 37: 182–191.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Soupart A, Gross P, Legros JJ, Alfoldi S, Annane D, Heshmati HM, Decaux G. Successful long-term treatment of hyponatremia in syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion with SR 121 463 B, an orally active, nonpeptide, vasopressin V-2 receptor antagonist. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 11: 634–640.
42. Nakamura S, Shuji I, Hiroyuki F, Yoshitaka Y, Toyoki M. Binding affinities of mozavaptan hydrochloride (OPC-31260) for vasopressin receptors. Jpn Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 34: 827–834.
43. Shigeki N, Hiroyuki H, Shiro T, Toshiyuki O, Toshiki M, Yoshitaka Y, Toyoki M. Aquaretic effects of mozavaptan hydrochloride (OPC-31260) in conscious rats and dogs. Jpn Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 34: 835–845.
44. Verbalis J, Bisaha J, Smith N. Novel vasopressin V1A and V2 antagonist (conivaptan) increases serum sodium concentration and effective water clearance in patients with hyponatremia. J Card Fail. 2004; 10: S27. Abstract.
45. Naitoh M, Risvanis J, Balding LC, Johnston CI, Burrell LM. Neurohormonal antagonism in heart failure: beneficial effects of vasopressin V(1a) and V(2) receptor blockade and ACE inhibition. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 54: 51–57.
46. Hirano T, Yamamura Y, Nakamura S, Onogawa T, Mori T. Effects of the V(2)-receptor antagonist OPC-41061 and the loop diuretic furosemide alone and in combination in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000; 292: 288–294.
47. Yamamura Y, Nakamura S, Itoh S, Hirano T, Onogawa T, Yamashita T, Yamada Y, Tsujimae K, Aoyama M, Kotosai K, Ogawa H, Yamashita H, Kondo K, Tominaga M, Tsujimoto G, Mori T. OPC-41061, a highly potent human vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist: pharmacological profile and aquaretic effect by single and multiple oral dosing in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998; 287: 860–867.
48. Gines P, Wong F, Watson H, Milutinovic S, Ruiz del Arbol L, Olteanu D. Effects of satavaptan, a selective vasopressin V(2) receptor antagonist, on ascites and serum sodium in cirrhosis with hyponatremia: a randomized trial. Hepatology. February 21, 2008. DOI: 10.1002/hep.22293. Available at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal. Accessed April 13, 2008.
49. Gheorghiade M, Gottlieb SS, Udelson JE, Konstam MA, Czerwiec F, Ouyang J, Orlandi C, Tolvaptan I. Vasopressin v(2) receptor blockade with tolvaptan versus fluid restriction in the treatment of hyponatremia. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97: 1064–1067.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Gheorghiade M, Abraham WT, Albert NM, Gattis Stough W, Greenberg BH, O'Connor CM, She L, Yancy CW, Young J, Fonarow GC, for the OPTIMIZE-HF Investigators and Coordinators. Relationship between admission serum sodium concentration and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure: an analysis from the OPTIMIZE-HF registry. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28: 980–988.
51. Klein L, O'Connor CM, Leimberger JD, GattisStough W, Pina IL, Felker GM, Adams KFJ, Califf RM, Gheorghiade M, for the OPTIMECHF Investigators. Lower serum sodium is associated with increased short-term mortality in hospitalized patients with worsening heart failure: results from the Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of Chronic Heart Failure (OPTIME-CHF) Study. Circulation. 2005; 111: 2454–2460.
52. Gheorghiade M, Rossi JS, Cotts W, Shin DD, Hellkamp AS, Pina IL, Fonarow GC, DeMarco T, Pauly DF, Rogers J, DiSalvo TG, Butler J, Hare JM, Francis GS, Stough WG, O'Connor CM. Characterization and prognostic value of persistent hyponatremia in patients with severe heart failure in the ESCAPE trial. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 1998–2005.
53. Gheorghiade M, Gattis WA, O'Connor CM, Adams KF, Elkayam U, Barbagelata A, Ghali JK, Benza RL, McGrew FA, Klapholz M. Effects of tolvaptan, a vasopressin antagonist, in patients hospitalized with worsening heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004; 291: 1963–1971.
54. Konstam MA, Gheorghiade M, Burnett JC Jr, Grinfeld L, Maggioni AP, Swedberg K, Udelson JE, Zannad F, Cook T, Ouyang J. Effects of oral tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: the EVEREST Outcome Trial. JAMA. 2007; 297: 1319–1331.
55. THE BALANCE Study: treatment of hyponatremia based on lixivaptan in NYHA class III/IV cardiac patient evaluation. Available at: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00578695?term=lixivaptan&rank=1. Accessed May 12, 2008.
56. Gheorghiade M, Konstam MA, Burnett JC Jr, Grinfeld L, Maggioni AP, Swedberg K, Udelson JE, Zannad F, Cook T, Ouyang J, Zimmer C, Orlandi C, for the Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST) Investigators. Short-term clinical effects of tolvaptan, an oral vasopressin antagonist, in patients hospitalized for heart failure: the EVEREST Clinical Status Trials. JAMA. 2007; 297: 1332–1343.
57. Gheorghiade M, Orlandi C, Burnett JC, Demets D, Grinfeld L, Maggioni A, Swedberg K, Udelson JE, Zannad F, Zimmer C, Konstam MA. Rationale and design of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the Efficacy of Vasopressin antagonism in Heart Failure: Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST). J Card Fail. 2005; 11: 260–269.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Goldsmith S. Efficacy and safety of conivaptan in acute decompensated heart failure; a dose-ranging pilot study. J Card Fail. 2006; 12 (suppl): S72. Abstract.
59. Publication Committee for the VMAC Investigators. Intravenous nesiritide vs nitroglycerin for treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002; 287: 1531–1540.
60. Russell SD, Adams KF, Shaw JP, Gattis WA, O'Connor CM. Results of a twelve week double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of oral conivaptan to assess functional capacity in patients with class III chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2003; 9: S60–S60.
61. Udelson JE, Orlandi C, O'Brien T, Sequeira R, Ouyang J, Konstam MA. Vasopressin receptor blockade in patients with congestive heart failure: results from a placebo controlled, randomized study comparing the effects of tolvaptan, furosemide, and their combination. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 156. Abstract.
62. Costello-Boerrigter LC, Smith WB, Boerrigter G, Ouyang J, Zimmer CA, Orlandi C, Burnett JC Jr. Vasopressin-2-receptor antagonism augments water excretion without changes in renal hemodynamics or sodium and potassium excretion in human heart failure. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006; 290: F273–F278.
63. Goldsmith SR, Gheorghiade M. Vasopressin antagonism in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 1785–1791.
64. Forman DE, Butler J, Wang Y, Abraham WT, O'Connor CM, Gottlieb SS, Loh E, Massie BM, Rich MW, Stevenson LW. Incidence, predictors at admission, and impact of worsening renal function among patients hospitalized with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 61–67.
65. De Luca L, Klein L, Udelson JE, Orlandi C, Sardella G, Fedele F, Gheorghiade M. Hyponatremia in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 96: 19L–23L.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
66. ‘TEMPO 3/4 Trial‘ Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of Polycystic Kidney Disease and Its Outcomes (TEMPO3/4). Available at: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00428948?term=TEMPO&rank=1. Accessed February 28, 2008.
67. Hunt SA, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). American College of Cardiology Web Site. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: e1–e82.
68. McMurray JJ, Teerlink JR, Cotter G, Bourge RC, Cleland JG, Jondeau G, Krum H, Metra M, O'Connor CM, Parker JD, Torre-Amione G, van Veldhuisen DJ, Lewsey J, Frey A, Rainisio M, Kobrin I, for the VERITAS Investigators. Effects of tezosentan on symptoms and clinical outcomes in patients with acute heart failure: the VERITAS randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2007; 298: 2009–2019.
69. Mann DL, McMurray JJ, Packer M. Targeted anticytokine therapy in patients with chronic heart failure: results of the Randomized Etanercept Worldwide Evaluation (RENEWAL). Circulation. 2004; 109: 1594–1602.
70. Ghali JK, Koren MJ, Taylor JR, Brooks-Asplund E, Fan K, Long LA, Smith N. Efficacy and safety of oral conivaptan: a V1a/V2 vasopressin receptor antagonist assessed in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with euvolemic or hypervolemic hyponatremia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91: 2145–2152.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. Gheorghiade and P. S. Pang Acute heart failure syndromes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 17, 2009; 53(7): 557 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. McMurray, M. Petrie, K. Swedberg, M. Komajda, S. Anker, and R. Gardner CHAPTER 23 Heart Failure ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||