Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;118:373-380
Published online before print July 7, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.748491
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
118/4/373    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.748491v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Remme, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Smiseth, O. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Remme, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Smiseth, O. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Contractile function
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2008;118:373-380.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Imaging

Mechanisms of Preejection and Postejection Velocity Spikes in Left Ventricular Myocardium

Interaction Between Wall Deformation and Valve Events

Espen W. Remme, MSc, Dr ing; Erik Lyseggen, MD, PhD; Thomas Helle-Valle, MD; Anders Opdahl, MD; Eirik Pettersen, MD; Trond Vartdal, MD; Asgrimur Ragnarsson, MD; Morten Ljosland, MD; Halfdan Ihlen, MD, PhD; Thor Edvardsen, MD, PhD; Otto A. Smiseth, MD, PhD

From the Institute for Surgical Research (E.W.R., E.L., T.H.-V., A.O., E.P., T.V., T.E., O.A.S.), Rikshospitalet University Hospital and University of Oslo, and Department of Cardiology (A.R., H.I., T.E.), Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; and Department of Heart and Lung Disease, Østfold Hospital, Fredrikstad, Norway (M.L.).

Correspondence to Otto Smiseth, Department of Cardiology, Rikshospitalet, N-0027 Oslo, Norway. E-mail Otto.Smiseth{at}rikshospitalet.no

Received July 21, 2006; accepted May 19, 2008.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Normal left ventricular myocardium demonstrates distinct spikes in the velocity trace before and after left ventricular ejection. We tested the hypothesis that the preejection and postejection velocity spikes reflect early systolic shortening and late systolic lengthening that are interrupted by mitral and aortic valve closure, respectively.

Methods and Results— In 11 anesthetized dogs, timing of valve closure was determined by pressure variables; left ventricular dimensions were determined by sonomicrometry. Myocardial shortening started 20±10 ms (mean±SD; P<0.001) before mitral valve closure and was interrupted at the time of mitral valve closure (time difference, 4±7 ms). Similarly, myocardial lengthening started 31±15 ms (P<0.001) before aortic valve closure and was interrupted at the time of aortic valve closure (time difference, 0±3 ms). Prevention of mitral (n=4) and aortic (n=4) valve closure by stenting the valves abolished the preejection and postejection velocity spikes, respectively. Echocardiographic measurements of patients (n=15) with severe mitral regurgitation showed that the preejection velocity spike was reduced after prosthetic valve replacement (43±25 versus 32±15 mm/s; P=0.036), indicating that preejection shortening was larger with a leaking valve. Similarly, late systolic lengthening was reduced in patients (n=15) with severe aortic regurgitation after prosthetic valve replacement; minimum postejection velocity spike was increased from –32±11 to –17±11 mm/s; P=0.0003). Asynchronous onset of contraction/relaxation and atrioventricular interaction were investigated as alternative mechanisms of the velocity spikes in dogs and patient groups but were found implausible.

Conclusions— This study supports the hypothesis that normal left ventricular preejection and postejection velocity spikes are attributed to valve closures that interrupt early systolic shortening and late systolic lengthening, respectively.


Key Words: echocardiography • mechanics • myocardium • valves • velocity


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The typical myocardial velocity trace seen in left ventricular (LV) long-axis views by tissue Doppler echocardiography consists of a positive systolic shortening wave during LV ejection (S wave) and negative myocardial lengthening waves during early filling (E' wave) and atrium-induced filling (A' wave). In addition, 2 spikes or rapid oscillations can be seen: one just before the ejection wave and one right after the ejection wave. These spikes are distinct features of the velocity trace (Figure 1). However, the cause of the preejection and postejection velocity spikes has not been determined.


Figure 1190143
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Typical tissue Doppler velocity trace extracted from the basal septal region in an apical 4-chamber image of a healthy individual. The preejection and postejection velocity spikes are marked with dashed circles. We labeled the peak of the preejection spike prea and the minimum velocity at the bottom of its downstroke preb. The minimum velocity at the start of the upstroke of the postejection velocity spike was labeled posta, and its peak was labeled postb.

Clinical Perspective p 380

Garcia et al1 speculated that the spikes reflect geometric changes caused by asynchronous contraction and ventricular interdependence. Sengupta et al2 proposed that the biphasic waves are associated with asynchronous deformation of subendocardial and subepicardial LV wall layers.

We propose a simple mechanism behind the myocardial preejection and postejection velocity spikes: At the onset of systole, LV wall shortening starts before mitral valve closure (MVC). The initial wall shortening pushes blood toward the valve, closes the valve leaflets, and moves them toward the left atrium (LA). We suggest that this mechanism accounts for the positive preejection velocity, which represents the upstroke of the preejection velocity spike. During this phase, LV cavity pressure and hence myofiber stresses are low, and high shortening velocities may be generated. The closing motion of the leaflets stops when the chordae tendineae and papillary muscles tense and prevent further leaflet motion. This restrains further wall shortening and accounts for the downstroke of the preejection velocity spike. Therefore, only minor wall movement occurs between MVC and aortic valve opening (AVO) until shortening resumes with AVO and onset of LV ejection. At the end of systole, we propose a similar mechanism, with myocardial lengthening starting before aortic valve closure (AVC) and causing a negative myocardial velocity, which represents the downstroke of the postejection velocity spike. When the closing motion of the aortic valve stops, myocardial lengthening is interrupted, which accounts for the upstroke of the postejection velocity spike.

To investigate the hypothesis that the preejection and postejection velocity spikes were due to valve closures, we investigated the relationships between the timing of valve closures and the velocity spikes in a dog model and in healthy humans. Furthermore, we predicted that removal of mitral and aortic valve function would abolish the preejection and postejection velocity spikes, respectively. Therefore, in the dog model, measurements were done before and after removal of valve function by the insertion of stents into the mitral and aortic valve orifices, respectively. In a human pathological correlation, the velocity spikes were investigated in patients with severe mitral and aortic regurgitation before and after implantation of prosthetic valves.

We also investigated the alternative hypothesis that preejection and postejection velocity spikes may be due to slight asynchrony in the onset of contraction and relaxation in the normal ventricle. Because of segmental differences in the timing of mechanical activation, preejection shortening could possibly be seen in early activated segments accompanied by simultaneous lengthening in late activated segments. Asynchronous relaxation may result in a similar segment interaction with postejection shortening in some segments accompanied by lengthening in others. Therefore, we studied the timing of velocity spikes in multiple myocardial segments and searched for asynchronous shortening-lengthening patterns.

Finally, we investigated whether the preejection velocity spike may be caused by atrioventricular (AV) interactions and, in particular, whether the preejection velocity may reflect passive recoil of LV myocardium, which has been stretched by atrial contraction. To this end, we included patients with atrial fibrillation to determine whether the preejection velocity spike was abolished or reduced relative to individuals in sinus rhythm. Furthermore, we studied patients during AV sequential pacing and different AV delays, which allowed complete separation of timing of atrial relaxation and LV contraction. If atrial relaxation causes a velocity resulting from passive recoil of LV myocardium, this should be identified during long AV delays as an LV shortening velocity before LV systole.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experimental Study
Eleven adult mongrel dogs (7 female; average weight, 31±4 kg) were used in this study. The laboratory animals were supplied by the Center for Comparative Medicine, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. The study was approved by the Norwegian National Animal Experimentation Board. The animals were anesthetized, ventilated, and surgically prepared as previously described.3

Micromanometer-tipped 5F catheters (model MPC-500, Millar Instruments, Houston, Tex) were positioned in the LV, in the LA, and in the ascending aorta close to the aortic valve. Calibration, data sampling, and analysis were done as previously described.3

Sonomicrometry
The LV dimensions were measured by ultrasonic crystals (Sonometrics, London, Ontario, Canada) implanted in the subendocardium. One crystal was placed at the apex, and 4 crystals were placed in the basal half of the LV 65% to 75% of the distance from apex to base in the anterior, lateral, posterior, and septal walls, respectively. This enabled measurements of 4 long-axis diameters and 2 short-axis diameters from the septal to lateral wall and the anterior to posterior wall. The sampling rate was set at >200 Hz.

Analysis of Baseline Recordings
The timing of valve closure and opening was defined as follows: MVC, defined as the peak of the c wave in the LA pressure trace4–6; AVO, defined as the beginning of the upstroke of the aortic pressure trace; AVC, defined as dP/dtmin of LV pressure; and mitral valve opening (MVO), defined as the first diastolic LA-LV pressure crossover.

Figure 2 illustrates how these timing criteria were applied. The figure also includes associated diameter, shortening velocity, and shortening acceleration traces demonstrating typical deformation pattern in relation to valve closures and openings. According to our hypothesis, MVC interrupts shortening and should therefore correspond to a peak in deceleration of shortening (downstroke of the preejection velocity spike). Similarly, AVC interrupts lengthening and should correspond to a positive peak in the shortening acceleration trace (upstroke of the postejection velocity spike). For each of the 4 long-axis and 2 short-axis traces, the relationship between the velocity spikes and valve events was investigated by a comparison of the time of MVC and peak early systolic deceleration and of AVC and peak late systolic acceleration.


Figure 2190143
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Recordings from a representative animal experiment. Velocity and acceleration traces represent the first and second derivatives of the negative-diameter trace. Positive acceleration values mean acceleration of shortening and deceleration of lengthening and vice versa. Valve closures and openings were defined by pressure variables as indicated in the pressure traces. Top, LV shortening starts (first arrow) before MVC and is interrupted at the time of MVC. This interruption is evident as a knee point in the diameter trace and a peak in shortening deceleration (first dashed vertical line). Shortening resumes at the second knee point, which corresponds to AVO. Onset of lengthening (second arrow) starts before AVC and is interrupted at the time of AVC. This interruption is seen as a knee point in the diameter trace and a corresponding peak in shortening acceleration (second dashed vertical line).

LV volume (LVV) was calculated as follows: LVV=({pi}/6)xLAXxSAXAPxSAXSL, where LAX is the average of the 4 long-axis diameters, and SAXAP and SAXSL are the anteroposterior and septal to lateral wall short-axis diameters, respectively. The reduction in LVV before MVC and the increase in LVV before AVC were calculated.

Stenting of the Mitral and Aortic Valves
To test the hypothesis that MVC causes the preejection velocity spike, a stent (Wallstent uni, Boston Scientific, Boston, Mass) was inflated in the mitral orifice over the mitral valve leaflets to prevent the valve from closing. The stenting, performed at the end of the experiment, was successful in 4 of 5 animals. The stent allowed blood to flow freely from the LV into the LA during the entire systole. The presence and magnitude of the preejection velocity spike were investigated before and after stenting.

In a separate set of animals, the aortic valve was prevented from closing by the inflation of a stent (Memotherm Aortic stent, Bard, Billerica, Mass) in the valve orifice over the aortic valve cusps. The implantation was successful in 4 of 6 animals. The aortic valve stent allowed blood to flow freely from the aorta into the LV after the ejection phase. The presence and magnitude of the postejection velocity spike were investigated before and after stenting.

Synchronicity of Contraction and Relaxation
To test the alternative hypothesis that preejection and postejection velocity spikes reflect normal asynchrony, we compared the timing and velocities of the preejection and postejection velocity spikes in the 4 long-axis diameters (apex to the anterior, posterior, septal, and lateral walls) during baseline conditions.

Clinical Studies
The velocity spikes were investigated in 10 healthy volunteers (2 women; mean age, 59±6 years), 15 patients (8 women; mean age, 67±12 years) with severe mitral regurgitation before and after implantation of a mechanical mitral valve prosthesis, 15 patients (7 women; mean age, 48±16 years) with severe aortic regurgitation before and after implantation of a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis, 10 patients (5 women; mean age, 75±17 years) with chronic atrial fibrillation, and 10 patients (5 women; mean age, 76±9 years) with third-degree AV block and a dual-chamber pacemaker.

The studies were approved by the National Committee for Medical Research Ethics of Norway. All participants gave informed consent.

Echocardiographic images were acquired with a Vivid 7 Ultrasound scanner (GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway). Basal septal velocities were investigated by tissue Doppler imaging in an apical 4-chamber view with frame rates of 161±45 frames per second. We confirmed in the animal study, using sonomicrometry as the reference method, that these frame rates resulted in errors <1±1 mm/s. MVC and AVC were defined as the time the valve leaflet stopped moving in the closing direction.

Study of Patients Before and After Prosthetic Mitral or Aortic Valve Implantation
To investigate how valvular regurgitation modified the preejection and postejection velocity spikes, we investigated the velocity spikes in patients with severe mitral or aortic valve regurgitation before and after prosthetic valve implantation (14 ON-X valves [On-X Life Technologies, Inc, Austin, Tex] and 16 CarboMedics valves [Carbo-Medics, Austin, Tex]).

Synchronicity of Contraction and Relaxation
To test the alternative hypothesis that the preejection and postejection velocity spikes could be attributed to normal asynchrony, we compared velocities in basal septal and lateral wall segments in the healthy subjects.

Study of AV Interaction
To test the hypothesis that the preejection velocity spike is caused by AV interaction, the presence and amplitude of the preejection velocity spike were investigated in the patient group with atrial fibrillation to determine whether the velocity spike was lost.

Furthermore, in the patients with third-degree AV block and a dual-chamber pacemaker, we performed pacing with AV delay at 3 different levels: (1) at a short delay of 50 ms, when the atrial myocardium was still in a stiff, contracted state during activation of the ventricular myocardium; (2) at the nominal delay of 130 ms, when atrial relaxation coincided with the time of ventricular activation; and (3) at a long delay of 300 ms, when the atrium had relaxed before ventricular activation.

Statistical Analysis
Continuous measurements are summarized as mean±SD. The average value from 3 consecutive heart cycles was calculated and used for analysis. Student’s paired t test was used to compare the timing of onset of shortening and lengthening relative to valve closures, the magnitude of the velocity spikes before and after stenting of valves, the velocities before and after implantation of prosthetic valves, and the timing and velocities in the septal and lateral walls in healthy subjects. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used to test for statistical differences between timing and velocities in the 4 long-axis diameters in the animal study. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.

The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experimental Study
Figure 3 displays LV pressure-volume relations, with the timings of valve openings and closures indicated. As demonstrated in the pressure-volume loop, the LV contracts during early systole, but the reduction in LVV ceases at the time of MVC and remains unchanged until AVO. The loop also demonstrates that the LV starts expanding before AVC, but the increase in LVV ceases at the time of AVC and remains constant until approximately MVO. The average LVV reduction before MVC was 4.7±2.2%, and the volume increase before AVC was 1.4±0.6%, calculated relative to end-diastolic volume.


Figure 3190143
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. LV volume, pressure, and pressure-volume loop from an animal experiment.

Changes were found in both long- and short-axis diameters that corresponded to the described LVV changes (Table 1 and 2Down). Shortening of the LV diameters started 20±10 ms (P<0.001) before MVC and was interrupted at the time of MVC. The agreement between the timing of MVC and interruption of shortening was very good, with a mean time difference of 4±7 ms. Similarly, lengthening started 31±15 ms (P<0.001) before AVC and was interrupted at the time of AVC. Excellent agreement was found between the timing of AVC and the interruption of lengthening; the mean time difference was 0±3 ms.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Experimental Study: Timing of LV Wall Deformation in Relation to Valve Closure


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Experimental Study: LV Shortening and Lengthening Before Valve Closure and Total Systolic Shortening

Figure 2 displays the relationship between traces of LV diameter, velocity, acceleration, and pressure variables, together with timing of valve events. The figure demonstrates that early systolic shortening stops at the time of MVC and resumes at the time of AVO, as seen by the knee points in the diameter trace at these 2 times. It further shows that late systolic lengthening is interrupted, as seen by the knee point at the time of AVC. The observed LV shortening after AVC represents postsystolic shortening, which may be seen in hearts after surgical instrumentation.

Stenting of the Mitral Valve
Figure 4 shows an example of a diameter trace before and after stenting of the mitral valve. Before stenting, early systolic shortening was interrupted at the time of MVC. This resulted in a preejection velocity spike that had an average magnitude of 63±29 mm/s. After stenting, shortening continued without interruption as the stent prevented valve closure and allowed the LV to eject blood back into the LA. This resulted in a smooth transition from lengthening to shortening; therefore, the preejection velocity spike was essentially removed. However, because of the nature of differentiation, only small curvature changes in the diameter trace resulted in a wave in the velocity trace. Thus, the spike was not totally removed in all traces, and the average poststent spike was 10±14 mm/s, which still was markedly smaller than before stenting (P<0.001).


Figure 4190143
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Responses to mitral valve stenting. Arrows indicate the interrupted shortening at the time of MVC before stenting. The magnitude of the preejection velocity spike (dv) is indicated. After stenting, there occurs a smooth transition from lengthening to shortening during the same phase in the cardiac cycle (dotted circles), and the early systolic velocity spike has essentially disappeared. The increased systolic velocity reflects the large LV stroke volume with incompetent mitral valve.

Stenting of the Aortic Valve
Representative recordings from stenting of the aortic valve are shown in Figure 5. Before stenting, the traces displayed the typical lengthening pattern just before AVC, followed by a knee point at AVC and a shortening or plateau right after AVC. The derivative of these traces exhibited the distinct postejection velocity spike. After stenting, lengthening was allowed to continue uninterrupted as the stent prevented valve closure and allowed blood to flow back from the aorta into the LV. The smooth transition from shortening to lengthening essentially removed the postejection velocity spike. The average magnitude of the velocity spike was reduced from 22±11 mm/s before stenting to 2±3 mm/s after stenting (P<0.001).


Figure 5190143
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Responses to aortic valve stenting. Arrow indicates the interrupted lengthening pattern at the time of AVC before stenting. The magnitude of the postejection velocity spike (dv) is indicated. After stenting, the interrupted lengthening pattern is removed, and there occurs a smooth transition from shortening to lengthening during the same phase in the cardiac cycle (dotted circle); consequently, the postejection velocity spike is erased.

Synchronicity of Contraction and Relaxation
As demonstrated by the representative recordings in Figure 6 (top) and summarized in Table 3, the preejection and postejection velocity spikes were synchronous throughout the LV. The maximum time difference of the 4 measured preejection velocity spikes (prea) was 11±11 ms; it was 12±8 ms for the postejection velocity spikes (posta).


Figure 6190143
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Simultaneously measured long-axis velocities from different wall segments in a representative animal and healthy human. The 2 vertical lines in the middle heartbeat indicate the simultaneous occurrence of the preejection and postejection velocity spikes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Experimental Study: Velocities and Timing of Long-Axis Preejection and Postejection Spike Velocities in Different Walls

Clinical Study
Representative velocity recordings from the different clinical substudies are shown in Figure 7.


Figure 7190143
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Representative myocardial velocity traces from the different clinical substudies. Top, Recordings from a healthy individual and a patient before and after mitral valve surgery. Middle, Recordings from a patient before and after aortic valve surgery and a patient with atrial fibrillation. Bottom, Recordings from a patient with third-degree AV block and a dual-chamber pacemaker during different AV delays. The arrow in the last trace points to the first of the 2 preejection velocity spikes that occurred before LV systole during a 300-ms AV delay.

Mitral and Aortic Regurgitation
In patients with mitral valve regurgitation, the peak preejection velocity spike (prea in Figure 1) was 43±25 before valve surgery and 32±15 mm/s afterward (P=0.036). Minimum velocity of the downstroke of the spike (preb) changed from 6±15 to –11±13 mm/s (P=0.002). These changes indicate a trend toward less shortening before MVC and more complete interruption of shortening by the valve prosthesis. In patients with aortic regurgitation, the peak postejection velocity spike (postb) was virtually unchanged after valve surgery: 14±25 mm/s before and 19±12 mm/s after (P=0.56). However, minimum velocity at the bottom of the upstroke of the postejection velocity spike (posta) changed from –32±11 to –17±11 mm/s (P=0.0003), indicating that LV wall lengthening occurring before AVC was reduced after valve surgery.

Synchronicity of Contraction and Relaxation
In the normal subjects, the preejection and postejection velocity spikes occurred simultaneously in the septal and lateral walls (Figure 6, bottom). Mean data are presented in Table 4. In each patient, MVC occurred during downstroke of the preejection velocity spike, whereas AVC occurred during upstroke of the postejection velocity spike.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Clinical Study (Healthy Subjects): Preejection and Postejection Velocity Spikes in the Septal and Lateral Walls

AV Interaction
In patients with atrial fibrillation, a distinct preejection velocity spike clearly was present. The average peak velocity (prea) was 31±12 mm/s, and the minimum velocity of the downstroke (preb) was –8±16 mm/s.

In patients with third-degree AV block, pacing with a short and nominal AV delay did not alter the preejection velocity spike (37±20 and 39±11 mm/s, respectively). In contrast, pacing with a 300-ms-long AV delay altered the morphology of the velocity trace, and 2 preejection velocity spikes were present (Figure 7, bottom right). After atrial contraction, a small positive spike (16±8 mm/s) appeared during atrial relaxation (indicated by an arrow in Figure 7 on the bottom right). This spike occurred before activation of the LV and is consistent with elastic recoiling of the LV during atrial relaxation. The second preejection velocity spike was 37±9 mm/s.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study demonstrates that the preejection velocity spike in normal LV myocardium is due to early systolic shortening, which is interrupted by MVC, and the postejection velocity spike is due to late systolic lengthening, which is interrupted by AVC. These mechanisms were supported by observations in healthy human hearts and by animal experiments that included implantation of stents over the mitral and aortic valves to prevent valve closure. When MVC was prevented, the preejection velocity spike was abolished, and when AVC was prevented, the postejection velocity spike was abolished, confirming the role of valve closures in generating the velocity patterns.

Valve stenting represents extreme cases of valvular regurgitation. As demonstrated in this study, even patients with severe mitral and aortic regurgitation have relatively preserved preejection and postejection velocity spikes. This is consistent with the notion that even regurgitant valves represent a restriction to transvalvular backflow. An analogy may be sails on a boat: When a gust of wind comes along and folds out the sail, the boat will be pushed along even if the sail has big holes. Only if all ropes and rigging are cut will no force be transferred from the sail to the boat.

Role of Synchronicity of Contraction and Relaxation
We could not attribute the velocity spikes to asynchronous contraction and relaxation in the normal heart because our investigation showed that the preejection and postejection velocity spikes were synchronous throughout the LV. All long- and short-axis diameters were included in the formula for calculation of LVV. The volume reduction before MVC and volume increase before AVC are consistent with the notion that most of the myocardial segments contract and lengthen simultaneously during these 2 periods, respectively.

Role of AV Interaction
The maintained preejection velocity spike in patients with atrial fibrillation and in patients with short AV delay in whom atrial relaxation occurred after the spike indicates that the atrial contraction/relaxation sequence is not the mechanism of the spike. However, during long AV delays, a small positive LV myocardial velocity was observed during atrial relaxation. This velocity may be attributed to passive LV shortening resulting from elastic recoiling of the LV wall during atrial relaxation. This mechanism may contribute to the LV preejection velocity, but its magnitude is small, and it cannot be the principal mechanism. This is supported by the finding of preejection velocities in the normal range in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Comments on Methodology
In the present study, MVC was defined as the time when the mitral valve stopped moving in the closing direction rather than as the time of leaflet coaptation. The latter definition is appropriate in assessments of isovolumic contraction time, which is the time between the end of mitral inflow and the onset of LV outflow. In the normal heart, LV preejection shortening precedes the isovolumic phase, causing a rise in LV pressure, which decelerates mitral inflow and causes the leaflets to coapt. LV preejection shortening continues during the isovolumic phase by displacing blood toward the mitral region, resulting in bulging of the mitral leaflets into the LA. When the mitral valve reaches its final closing position, preejection shortening is suddenly arrested as the chordae tendineae and papillary muscles tense and stop further leaflet motion.4–6 Therefore, preejection shortening occurs before and during the isovolumic contraction. The c wave in the LA pressure curve indicates the time when the leaflets, which are pushed toward the LA, reach their final closing configuration.4–6

Volume Shifts During Valve Closure
The LV cavity volume showed a small volume reduction at the beginning of systole before MVC and a small volume increase at the end of systole before AVC (Figure 3, bottom). The volume estimate did not encompass the movement of the valve surfaces or the most basal region of the LV wall. During early systolic contraction, some blood volume may be shifted from the region included in our volume calculation into the more basal LV region. Most likely, the reduced volume at the beginning of systole is enclosed within the mitral leaflets that have moved toward the LA. This interpretation is in accordance with previous reports that have shown that significant contraction may occur before final valve closure.4–10

Although the total cavity volume is isovolumic from the instant the valve leaflets coapt, wall shortening is not restrained until the motion of the valve leaflets is stopped and consequently restrains further volume shift and shortening. Figure 8 (left) shows a schematic of the volume shift within the LV during MVC. Similarly, the closing motion of the aortic cusps into the LV may be responsible for part of the measured volume increase. The latter is supported by Ruttley et al,11 who found an LVV increase during protodiastole. Figure 8 (right) illustrates the volume shift within the LV during AVC. The volume increase at the end of systole is smaller than the volume decrease at the beginning of systole, consistent with the smaller cusps of the aortic valve compared with the mitral valve leaflets.


Figure 8190143
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8. Schematic of LV volume shifts during valve closures. Left, MVC. Left ventricular contraction causes a rise in LV pressure, which pushes the mitral leaflets toward the LA. Simultaneous redistribution of blood toward the mitral valve occurs. The displaced blood is indicated by the shaded area. This causes a reduction in the subvalvular LV volume during MVC. Right, AVC. During LV pressure decrease at end systole, a slight reversal of aortic flow occurs, and the aortic cusps move toward the LV cavity. Both mechanisms contribute to a small rise in LV volume at end systole. The displaced blood is indicated by the shaded area.

Mechanical prosthetic valve leaflets do not bulge; hence, one may infer that the spike should be abolished or significantly reduced. However, the mechanical valve leaflets also must be pushed from an open to a closed position by backward flow (a volume shift). The blood on the atrial side of the leaflets also must be displaced backward as the valve closes. This probably explains why an LA pressure c wave is also found in patients with mechanical prosthetic mitral valves12 and an LVV increase during AVC in patients with mechanical aortic valves. Our measurements showed maintained presence of the velocity spikes in patients with mechanical valves. The changes in spike velocities after valve implantation in these patients are consistent with a reduced regurgitation volume during valve closure.

Study Limitations
The small sample sizes of the different substudies, particularly stenting of the valves, represent a limitation of our study. However, the results are supported by the consistent findings within each group. We have focused on the mechanisms of the preejection and postejection velocity spikes in the normal heart. Other mechanisms may cause velocity spikes not related to valve closure in diseased hearts, particularly in the case of dyssynchrony such as in left bundle-branch block.

Postsystolic shortening may generate positive postsystolic velocities that are not directly linked to AVC. As demonstrated in our laboratory, postsystolic shortening may occur as a result of passive recoil of myocardium that has been stretched during systole or as a result of delayed active contraction in dysfunctional myocardium.13 Furthermore, minor degrees of postsystolic shortening are a normal finding in healthy subjects.14 However, AVC may still be reflected by the rapid upstroke of the postejection velocity spike.

This study does not address the issue of "isovolumic acceleration." As shown by Lyseggen et al,15 moderately ischemic segments had preserved isovolumic acceleration, but the peak preejection velocity spike decreased. This is consistent with the notion that moderately ischemic fibers shorten less and perform less work during early systole but are still capable of causing a rapid velocity change when the fiber stress is low at the onset of systole.

Study Implications
Myocardial velocity spikes are widely used clinically to evaluate LV function, and it is essential that we understand how they are modified by physiological events and disease processes. The present study indicates that valve events are the determinants of normal preejection and postejection velocity spikes and that velocity spikes could represent a means to automatically detect timing of valve closure16 and opening.

Conclusions
The present study supports our hypothesis that the LV myocardial preejection velocity spike arises from early systolic shortening that is temporarily interrupted by MVC and resumes at the time of AVO and similarly that the postejection velocity spike is a result of late systolic lengthening that is interrupted by AVC and resumes at the time of MVO. These insights may be important when velocities and deformation imaging are used to diagnose myocardial dysfunction.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr Helge Skulstad for data from healthy volunteers.

Sources of Funding

Drs Lyseggen, Helle-Valle, Opdahl, and Vartdal were recipients of clinical research fellowships from the Norwegian Council of Cardiovascular Diseases. Dr Pettersen was the recipient of a research fellowship from the Norwegian Research Council.

Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Garcia MJ, Rodriguez L, Ares M, Griffin BP, Klein AL, Stewart WJ, Thomas JD. Myocardial wall velocity assessment by pulsed Doppler tissue imaging: characteristic findings in normal subjects. Am Heart J. 1996; 132: 648–656.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Sengupta PP, Khandheria BK, Korinek J, Wang J, Belohlavek M. Biphasic tissue Doppler waveforms during isovolumic phases are associated with asynchronous deformation of subendocardial and subepicardial layers. J Appl Physiol. 2005; 99: 1104–1111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Urheim S, Edvardsen T, Torp H, Angelsen B, Smiseth OA. Myocardial strain by Doppler echocardiography: validation of a new method to quantify regional myocardial function. Circulation. 2000; 102: 1158–1164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Lakier JB, Fritz VU, Pocock WA, Barlow JB. Mitral components of the first heart sound. Br Heart J. 1972; 34: 160–166.[Free Full Text]

5. Lakier JB, Kinsley RH, Pocock WA, Barlow JB. Left atrial C wave and mitral leaflet size. Cardiovasc Res. 1972; 6: 585–588.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Laniado S, Yellin EL, Miller H, Frater RW. Temporal relation of the first heart sound to closure of the mitral valve. Circulation. 1973; 47: 1006–1014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Laniado S, Yellin E, Kotler M, Levy L, Stadler J, Terdiman R. A study of the dynamic relations between the mitral valve echogram and phasic mitral flow. Circulation. 1975; 51: 104–113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Tsakiris AG, Gordon DA, Padiyar R, Frechette D. Relation of mitral valve opening and closure to left atrial and ventricular pressures in the intact dog. Am J Physiol. 1978; 234: H146–H151.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Goetz WA, Lansac E, Lim HS, Weber PA, Duran CM. Left ventricular endocardial longitudinal and transverse changes during isovolumic contraction and relaxation: a challenge. Am J Physiol. 2005; 289: H196–H201.

10. Pohost GM, Dinsmore RE, Rubenstein JJ, O'Keefe DD, Grantham RN, Scully HE, Beierholm EA, Frederiksen JW, Weisfeldt ML, Daggett WM. The echocardiogram of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve: correlation with hemodynamic and cineroentgenographic studies in dogs. Circulation. 1975; 51: 88–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Ruttley MS, Adams DF, Cohn PF, Abrams HL. Shape and volume changes during "isovolumetric relaxation" in normal and asynergic ventricles. Circulation. 1974; 50: 306–316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Burstow DJ, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR, Reeder GS, Holmes DR Jr, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurement of prosthetic valve gradients: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study. Circulation. 1989; 80: 504–514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Skulstad H, Edvardsen T, Urheim S, Rabben SI, Stugaard M, Lyseggen E, Ihlen H, Smiseth OA. Postsystolic shortening in the ischemic myocardium: active contraction or passive recoil? Circulation. 2002; 106: 718–724.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Voigt JU, Lindenmeier G, Exner B, Regenfus M, Werner D, Reulbach U, Nixdorff U, Flachskampf FA, Daniel WG. Incidence and characteristics of segmental postsystolic longitudinal shortening in normal, acutely ischemic, and scarred myocardium. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003; 16: 415–423.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Lyseggen E, Rabben SI, Skulstad H, Urheim S, Risoe C, Smiseth OA. Myocardial acceleration during isovolumic contraction: relationship to contractility. Circulation. 2005; 111: 1362–1369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Aase SA, Stoylen A, Ingul CB, Frigstad S, Torp H. Automatic timing of aortic valve closure in apical tissue Doppler images. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006; 32: 19–27.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Tissue Doppler echocardiography is used clinically to assess left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in terms of myocardial velocities during ejection and filling, respectively. In addition, brief velocity spikes occur before and after ejection, but the cause and clinical importance of these velocity spikes have been debated. This combined experimental and clinical study indicates that the normal preejection velocity spike is due to myocardial shortening, which displaces blood toward the mitral region and causes bulging of the mitral leaflets into the left atrium; when the valve reaches its final closing position, preejection shortening is suddenly arrested. Hence, the initial shortening is reflected by the upstroke of the spike, whereas the downstroke reflects the interrupted shortening. The postejection velocity spike appears to be caused by a similar mechanism; reverse blood flow closes the aortic valve and slightly expands the ventricle until valve closure interrupts the expansion. The expansion is seen as a negative velocity at end systole, and the interruption of lengthening is reflected by the upstroke of the postejection velocity spike. In the normal heart, onset of shortening occurs simultaneously throughout the left ventricular wall as indicated by synchronous preejection velocity spikes in different left ventricular wall regions. Thus, investigation of preejection wall deformation may allow assessment of dyssynchronous contraction and the effects of resynchronization therapy. Furthermore, because preejection and postejection velocity spikes reflect valve events, they may represent a means to detect timing of valve closure and opening.


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 118: 321-322. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. E. Weyman
The year in echocardiography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 28, 2009; 53(17): 1558 - 1567.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. Lyseggen, T. Vartdal, E. W. Remme, T. Helle-Valle, E. Pettersen, A. Opdahl, T. Edvardsen, and O. A. Smiseth
A novel echocardiographic marker of end systole in the ischemic left ventricle: "tug of war" sign
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2009; 296(3): H645 - H654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
H. Ashikaga, T. I.G. van der Spoel, B. A. Coppola, and J. H. Omens
Transmural myocardial mechanics during isovolumic contraction.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., February 1, 2009; 2(2): 202 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
P. P. Sengupta
Exploring left ventricular isovolumic shortening and stretch mechanics: "The heart has its reasons...".
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., February 1, 2009; 2(2): 212 - 215.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
118/4/373    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.748491v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Remme, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Smiseth, O. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Remme, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Smiseth, O. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Contractile function
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrowRelated Article