| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2008;118:1598-1601.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinician Update |
From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Gregory Piazza, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Womens Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail gpiazza{at}partners.org
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Overview |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Pathophysiology |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hemodynamics
Acute PE increases pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular (RV) afterload through direct physical obstruction, hypoxemia, and pulmonary vasoconstrictors.6 Many heart failure patients with LV systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, or a combination of both suffer from some degree of RV pressure overload and RV dysfunction. A sudden superimposed increase in RV afterload from acute PE leads to worsening RV dilatation and hypokinesis, tricuspid regurgitation, and ultimately acute RV failure. Heart failure patients rely on relatively preserved RV function to maintain LV preload and systemic cardiac output. RV pressure overload caused by PE may result in interventricular septal deviation toward the LV in diastole and decreased RV systolic function, thereby limiting LV filling and left-sided cardiac output (see the Movie in the online Data Supplement). In addition, RV pressure overload may result in increased wall stress and ischemia by simultaneously increasing myocardial oxygen demand while decreasing supply (Figure 1).6
|
| Diagnosis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Laboratory testing of heart failure patients with suspected acute PE is complicated because elevated D-dimer levels may be present in heart failure alone. Similarly, cardiac biomarkers, including troponin, brain-type natriuretic peptide, and pro-brain–type natriuretic peptide, may be difficult to interpret because they often are abnormally elevated in heart failure. Nevertheless, heart failure patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers and findings of new or worsened RV failure should undergo further evaluation for PE. Elevated cardiac biomarkers in the setting of PE correlate with the presence of RV dysfunction, a powerful independent predictor of early mortality.7
Contrast-enhanced chest CT is the preferred imaging modality to evaluate suspected PE in heart failure patients. However, use of intravenous contrast-enhanced chest CT may be problematic for heart failure patients with chronic kidney disease who will have increased susceptibility to contrast nephropathy. In addition, the rapid bolus administration of intravenous contrast may cause a sudden increase in intracardiac pressures and pulmonary edema. Heart failure patients presenting with pulmonary vascular congestion or systemic hypertension should be stabilized before undergoing chest CT.
An Integrated Approach to Diagnosis
An algorithm for the diagnosis of acute PE in heart failure patients should integrate clinical probability with appropriate use of D-dimer testing and imaging studies (Figure 2).8 Both the Christopher Study9 and the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis II (PIOPED II) trial10 have validated a simplified clinical decision rule, known as the Wells criteria, in combination with D-dimer testing and chest CT to evaluate suspected PE.
|
| Management |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary Therapy
Options for primary therapy in heart failure patients with acute PE include fibrinolysis, surgical pulmonary embolectomy, or catheter-assisted pulmonary embolectomy. Primary therapy is reserved for patients presenting with either massive or submassive PE.7 Many heart failure patients will have comorbid conditions and contraindications that preclude the consideration of primary therapy.
Supportive Management of Massive PE
Coexisting left ventricular systolic dysfunction and diastolic dysfunction complicate the management of heart failure patients with massive PE. Although a common strategy in response to systemic arterial hypotension is to prescribe a fluid bolus, volume loading may worsen biventricular failure, pulmonary edema, and hypoxemia. An initial trial of volume expansion, limited to 250 to 500 mL, may be attempted in those heart failure patients without evidence of increased right-sided filling pressures or pulmonary edema.6
Although non–heart failure patients generally respond well to pure vasopressors for hemodynamic support in massive PE, many heart failure patients will not tolerate the isolated increase in systemic vascular resistance. PE patients with heart failure may require an agent with mixed vasopressor and inotropic properties such as norepinephrine, epinephrine, or dopamine. Whereas LV function often becomes hyperdynamic to compensate for RV failure, the presence of underlying LV systolic dysfunction in heart failure patients may limit the patients ability to maintain normal systemic cardiac output and may necessitate the addition of inotropes.
Anticoagulation
Options for anticoagulation include intravenous unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and fondaparinux. Hepatic congestion will slow the metabolism of unfractionated heparin in heart failure patients, resulting in lower-than-usual doses to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation. Renal impairment, a common comorbid condition among heart failure patients, may result in excessive anticoagulation and bleeding when low-molecular-weight heparins and fondaparinux are used, both of which are cleared by the kidney.
The management of warfarin therapy can be problematic in heart failure patients who have comorbidities and take numerous medications that affect its metabolism and amplify the risk of bleeding. Bowel congestion and poor hepatic function resulting from liver congestion or low cardiac output can impair warfarin metabolism. Frequently prescribed medications in heart failure patients such as amiodarone and clopidogrel potentiate the effect of warfarin, whereas others, like spironolactone, accelerate its metabolism.
For heart failure patients with contraindications to anticoagulation or who suffer recurrent PE despite therapeutic anticoagulation, inferior vena cava filter insertion should be considered. Inferior vena cava filters reduce the risk of PE but increase the long-term risk of deep vein thrombosis.
| Prevention |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Options for VTE prophylaxis include pharmacological prophylaxis with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or fondaparinux and mechanical prophylaxis with graduated compression stockings or pneumatic compression devices (Table 2). Heart failure patients at high risk of PE may benefit from combined pharmacological and mechanical modalities. Whereas prophylactic anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin or fondaparinux is generally associated with a low risk of bleeding, the frequency of bleeding complications may increase in heart failure patients with renal impairment.
|
Case Presentation: The patient received an intravenous bolus of unfractionated heparin followed by continuous infusion titrated to a target activated partial thromboplastin time of 60 to 80 seconds. An echocardiogram demonstrated new RV dilatation and hypokinesis, as well as moderate to severe elevation in pulmonary artery systolic pressure compared with a prior study. His systemic arterial hypotension resolved after a 250-mL intravenous bolus of normal saline. He was eventually discharged on oral anticoagulation with a goal international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. Six weeks later, a follow-up echocardiogram demonstrated improved RV function and return of pulmonary artery systolic pressure to baseline. This case presentation highlights the challenge of diagnosing PE in patients with heart failure. Dyspnea and hypoxemia out of proportion to findings of pulmonary vascular congestion on physical examination or chest x-ray should raise concern for acute PE. The case also identifies PE as a preventable complication of heart failure and emphasizes the importance of VTE prophylaxis in this vulnerable patient population.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Monreal M, Munoz-Torrero JF, Naraine VS, Jimenez D, Soler S, Rabunal R, Gallego P. Pulmonary embolism in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or congestive heart failure. Am J Med. 2006; 119: 851–858.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Darze ES, Latado AL, Guimaraes AG, Guedes RA, Santos AB, de Moura SS, Passos LC. Acute pulmonary embolism is an independent predictor of adverse events in severe decompensated heart failure patients. Chest. 2007; 131: 1838–1843.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Piazza G, Seddighzadeh A, Goldhaber SZ. Heart failure in patients with deep vein thrombosis. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 101: 1056–1059.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Piazza G, Seddighzadeh A, Goldhaber SZ. Deep-vein thrombosis in the elderly. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. July 9, 2008. doi:10.1177/1076029608317942. Available at: http://cat.sagepub.com. Accessed July 3, 2008.
6. Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ. The acutely decompensated right ventricle: pathways for diagnosis and management. Chest. 2005; 128: 1836–1852.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ. Acute pulmonary embolism, part II: treatment and prophylaxis. Circulation. 2006; 114: e42–e47.
8. Piazza G, Goldhaber SZ. Acute pulmonary embolism, part I: epidemiology and diagnosis. Circulation. 2006; 114: e28–e32.
9. van Belle A, Buller HR, Huisman MV, Huisman PM, Kaasjager K, Kamphuisen PW, Kramer MH, Kruip MJ, Kwakkel-van Erp JM, Leebeek FW, Nijkeuter M, Prins MH, Sohne M, Tick LW. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006; 295: 172–179.
10. Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, Gottschalk A, Hales CA, Hull RD, Leeper KV Jr, Popovich J Jr, Quinn DA, Sos TA, Sostman HD, Tapson VF, Wakefield TW, Weg JG, Woodard PK. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 2317–2327.
11. Schoepf UJ, Kucher N, Kipfmueller F, Quiroz R, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ. Right ventricular enlargement on chest computed tomography: a predictor of early death in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2004; 110: 3276–3280.
12. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Samama CM, Lassen MR, Colwell CW. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition). Chest. 2008; 133: 381S–453S.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Jois-Bilowich P, Michota F, Bartholomew JR, Glauser J, Diercks D, Weber J, Fonarow GC, Emerman CL, Peacock WF 4th. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized heart failure patients. J Card Fail. 2008; 14: 127–132.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Piazza and S. Z. Goldhaber Computerized Decision Support for the Cardiovascular Clinician: Applications for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention and Beyond Circulation, September 22, 2009; 120(12): 1133 - 1137. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |