Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;118:e505
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.790675
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Razzolini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Tarantini, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Razzolini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Tarantini, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive

(Circulation. 2008;118:e505.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Correspondence

Letter by Razzolini and Tarantini Regarding Article, "Restrictive Left Ventricular Filling Pattern Does Not Result From Increased Left Atrial Pressure Alone"

Renato Razzolini, MD; Giuseppe Tarantini, MD

Department of Heart, Chest and Vessels Science, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

To the Editor:

We congratulate Masutani and colleagues1 on their insightful article distinguishing a restrictive filling pattern due to an overfilled normal left ventricle from one due to a failing enlarged left ventricle. We do not think, however, that the differences they found in diastolic parameters are due to primary diastolic dysfunction, as they claim. In fact, they compared 3 groups of dogs: a control group (C), a volume overloaded group (VOL), and a group with systolic heart failure induced by rapid ventricular pacing (HF). Therefore, the differences in diastolic parameters between VOL and HF groups are obviously due primarily to a systolic, not diastolic, dysfunction. Moreover, the difference in average operative compliance (KLV) does not mean that the 3 groups belong to 3 different passive pressure-volume curves: the average KLV in group C could well be the average of the flat portion, whereas KLV in group HF could be the average of the steep portion and KLV in group VOL could be the average of both portions of the same pressure-volume curve.

We think that the article is an elegant proof that heart failure with systolic dysfunction can induce a secondary alteration in diastolic parameters but is not proof of a primary diastolic dysfunction.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Disclosures

None.


*    Reference
up arrowTop
*Reference
 
1. Masutani S, Little WC, Hasegawa H, Cheng H-J, Cheng C-P. Restrictive left ventricular filling pattern does not result from increased left atrial pressure alone. Circulation. 2008; 117: 1550–1554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Razzolini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Tarantini, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Razzolini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Tarantini, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive