Circulation. 2008;118:e498-e500
Published online before print August 25, 2008,
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.804872
(Circulation. 2008;118:e498-e500.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
How Are Our Hospitals Measuring Up?
"Hospital Compare": A Resource for Hospital Quality of Care
Maria A. Johnson, BA;
Sharon-Lise T. Normand, PhD;
Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM
From the Section of Cardiovascular Medicine (M.A.J., H.M.K.) and the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program (H.M.K.), Department of Internal Medicine, and Section of Health Policy and Administration (H.M.K.), School of Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Conn (H.M.K.); and Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School and the Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health (S.-L.T.N.), Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Dr H.M. Krumholz, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208088, New Haven, CT 06520–8088. E-mail harlan.krumholz{at}yale.edu
 |
How well are hospitals in the United States taking care of their patients, and how can you learn more about the quality of care at hospitals in your area compared with care provided elsewhere?
|
|---|
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal
agency that administers the Medicare program, publishes information
on the Internet about the quality of hospital care for many
conditions, including heart attacks and heart failure. The quality
measures for cardiac disease include information about how often
eligible patients are treated with certain medications, how
often smokers are counseled to quit, how often hospitals provide
rapid treatment to restore blood flow in the heart arteries
for patients who need that therapy quickly, and how often an
indicated test to measure heart function is done for patients
with heart failure. All of these measures assess care that is
strongly recommended by experts. The measures include only those
patients who should receive this care and, ideally, performance
on these measures should be very high. The results are provided
in terms of percentages, ie, how many people out of a hundred
are treated according to what is recommended. For example, aspirin
is recommended for all patients admitted with a heart attack,
and one measure determines the percent of patients in the selected
hospital who were treated with aspirin. With the attention given
to these measures, the rates have improved for all of them over
the last several years.
You can also find information about how patients fare in the 30 days after being admitted to the hospital for a heart attack and heart failure. This information includes a number called the risk-standardized mortality rate, numbers that are called the interval estimate, and a number that is called hospital volume. In this article, we explain how you can find these numbers, how you can interpret them, and how they can best be used (and how they should not be used).
 |
Where Do I Find This Information?
|
|---|
The information collected from hospitals is posted at the agencys
publicly available "Hospital Compare" website, http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov.
 |
...And What Do I Do When I Get There?
|
|---|
The "Hospital Compare" home page features an overview section
with definitions and background reading about topics, including
how patient outcomes are measured, and a section with information
about surveys completed by hospital patients regarding the care
they received. By clicking on the "learn more" link below each
topic, viewers can access a range of material that will help
them make the most of the wealth of information at the site.
The home page also features a general information section with
a link to a hospital checklist, a set of questions that may
be helpful when discussing hospital care with a healthcare provider,
and a Medicare document that details the rights of every patient.
To access a comparison of hospitals through the home page, the "find and compare hospitals" tab provides 2 ways to search (the Figure): search by specific conditions or procedures or general search (search for hospital information locally or nationally).
Either option will reveal a succession of screens, navigated with the "continue" tab, in which terms can be selected to narrow results.
 |
How to Search by Specific Conditions or Procedures
|
|---|
Step 1: Click on the "begin search" tab to start your search
for information about hospital process-of-care measures, hospital
outcome-of-care measures (when available), survey of patients
hospital experiences, and Medicare payment and volume (the number
of patients that each hospital treats for the condition or procedure)
for selected medical conditions or surgical procedures.
Step 2: Select one of the following options that will determine how "Hospital Compare" will search for your information: hospital name, city, ZIP code, state/territory, and county. If you choose city or ZIP code, you will be given drop-down fields in which you can indicate how wide a range (in miles) from that city or ZIP code you would like to extend your search. For example, if you choose city, enter "Boston," select as your distance in the drop-down menu 25 miles, and enter "Massachusetts" in the state field, your search will return the names of hospitals within a 25-mile radius of Boston, Mass.
Step 3: Select a medical condition or surgical procedure. Your choices for medical conditions are heart attack, heart failure, chronic lung disease, pneumonia, diabetes in adults, and chest pain. Your choices for surgical procedures are heart and blood vessels; abdominal; neck, back, and extremities (arms and legs); bladder, kidney, and prostate; and female reproductive. This results in the "select hospitals to compare" screen, a list of the hospitals that match the criteria you have specified.
If you click on a maximum of 3 check boxes next to the names of hospitals that you are interested in comparing and then select "compare" at the bottom or top of your screen, the final comparison is presented. By clicking either "view graphs" or "view tables," you can see the information in the format that is clearest for you. By clicking the "reset checkboxes" tab, you can compare a different combination of hospitals.
 |
How to Perform a General Search
|
|---|
The "begin search" tab in this option initiates the same steps
as above, except that the specification of medical condition
or surgical procedure is optional.
 |
What Is 30-Day Mortality and Why Is It Important?
|
|---|
A mortality rate is a death rate. It conveys the percentage
of patients (how many out of a hundred) who die from any cause
within a certain period of time. The 30-day mortality rate for
a hospital for a given condition provides information about
the number of patients who die divided by the total number of
patients and then multiplied by 100. The rate is essentially
the number of people who die for every 100 patients treated.
For example, a rate of 10% indicates that for every 100 patients
treated, 10 die. This rate would be equivalent to a survival
rate of 90%.
The problem with comparing the simple calculation of mortality rates among hospitals is that different hospitals treat different numbers and types of patients. We need advanced statistical techniques to take these differences into account. The result of such calculations produces a number that is called the risk-standardized mortality rate. This rate is important because it conveys how successful hospitals are at helping their patients to survive. Certainly, not all deaths in patients with heart attacks are preventable, even with the very best care. However, there are times when higher quality of care can prevent deaths, and hospitals that provide the best care would be expected to have the lowest mortality rates.
This rate also has 2 numbers associated with it, called the interval estimate. The interval estimate conveys the uncertainty about what the true rate is. This reporting approach contrasts with that for medication and counseling for which no uncertainty is reported. The interval estimate provides information similar to what is reported in political polls about the accuracy of the results. For example, we may hear that a candidates approval rate is 46% and the accuracy of the poll is 3%. This implies that the candidates true approval rate is anywhere between 43%=46%–3% and 49%=46%+3%, giving an interval estimate of 43% to 49%. How does this work for risk-standardized mortality rates? Suppose Hospital X has a reported mortality rate of 14% and the interval estimate is 11% to 17%. We interpret this to mean that the true risk-standardized mortality rate for Hospital X is anywhere between 11% and 17%, with our best guess at 14%.
Lastly, there is a number for hospital volume, the number of patients whom the hospital sees for the condition being reported. Hospital volume is important because it is difficult to know the quality of hospitals that treat only a small number of patients with a given condition. With little information, our best guess tends to be closer to the average for all hospitals because we know so little about the performance of that particular hospital.
 |
How Do I Interpret the Risk-Standardized Mortality Rate?
|
|---|
Consider Hospital X again with an estimated risk-standardized
mortality rate of 14% and an interval estimate ranging from
11% to 17%. The easiest way to interpret these numbers is to
compare the interval estimate of Hospital X with the national
average mortality rate. If the national rate is 16%, then Hospital
X is providing care as expected given the patients it treats
because our best estimate of care at Hospital X is anywhere
between 11% and 17%, which includes 16%. If the national rate
were 10%, then we would say that Hospital X provided worse-than-expected
care because the lower end of the interval estimate, 11%, is
higher than the national rate of 10%. Conversely, if the national
rate were 18%, then we would conclude that Hospital X provided
better-than-expected care because the upper end of the interval
estimate, 17%, is entirely below the national rate of 18%.
 |
How Is the Information on "Hospital Compare" Best Used?
|
|---|
"Hospital Compare" is best explored when you have time to read
and evaluate the information; it is not designed to be used
as a tool for hospital "shopping" online or for selecting hospitals
during an emergency. Rather, "Hospital Compare" should be considered
a valuable resource through which patients can share in the
latest knowledge that is emerging about the quality of care
and outcomes in our hospitals and healthcare systems, knowledge
that can be used to engage in informed discussions with physicians
and others surrounding this important topic.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
Disclosures
Dr Krumholz has contracts with the Colorado Foundation for Medical Care to develop outcomes and surveillance measures for public reporting. Dr Normand is funded by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health to monitor the quality of care after cardiac surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention. M.A. Johnson reports no conflicts.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
The information contained in this
Circulation Cardiology Patient
Page is not a substitute for medical advice, and the American
Heart Association recommends consultation with your doctor or
healthcare professional.