| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2008;118:1250-1258.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Heart Failure |
From the Turku PET Centre (H.T., A.N., K.N., P.N., P.I., H.U., J.K.), Department of Medicine, Turku University Central Hospital (H.T., E.E., K.E.J.A., P.N., H.U.), Department of Pharmacology, Drug Development and Therapeutics, University of Turku (M.S.), and Clinical Pharmacology, TYKSLAB, Hospital District of Southwest Finland (M.S.), Turku, Finland; Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (B.H.); Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy (P.I.); and Hatter Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa (L.H.O.).
Correspondence to Professor Juhani Knuuti, MD, Turku PET Centre, PO BOX 52, FI-20521 Turku, Finland. E-mail juhani.knuuti{at}utu.fi
Received July 24, 2007; accepted June 23, 2008.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results— Nineteen nondiabetic patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy on standard medication were randomized to single-blind trimetazidine (n=12) or placebo (n=7) for 3 months. Myocardial perfusion, FFA, and total oxidative metabolism were measured using positron emission tomography with [15O]H2O, [11C]acetate, and [11C]palmitate. Cardiac function was assessed echocardiographically; insulin sensitivity was assessed by the homeostasis model assessment index. Trimetazidine increased ejection fraction from 30.9±8.5% to 34.8±12% (P=0.027 versus placebo). Myocardial FFA uptake was unchanged, and β-oxidation rate constant decreased only 10%. Myocardial perfusion, oxidative metabolism, and work efficiency remained unchanged. Trimetazidine decreased insulin resistance (glucose: 5.9±0.7 versus 5.5±0.6 mmol/L, P=0.047; insulin: 10±6.9 versus 7.6±3.6 mU/L, P=0.031; homeostasis model assessment index: 2.75±2.28 versus 1.89±1.06, P=0.027). The degree of β-blockade and trimetazidine interacted positively on ejection fraction. Plasma high-density lipoprotein concentrations increased 11% (P<0.001).
Conclusions— In idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with heart failure, trimetazidine increased cardiac function and had both cardiac and extracardiac metabolic effects. Cardiac FFA oxidation modestly decreased and myocardial oxidative rate was unchanged, implying increased oxidation of glucose. Trimetazidine improved whole-body insulin sensitivity and glucose control in these insulin-resistant idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients, thus hypothetically countering the myocardial damage of insulin resistance. Additionally, the trimetazidine-induced increase in ejection fraction was associated with greater β1-adrenoceptor occupancy, suggesting a synergistic mechanism.
Key Words: fatty acids heart failure metabolism positron emission tomography trimetazidine
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Perspective p 1258
Metabolic modulators such as trimetazidine and perhexiline have raised considerable interest as additional forms of HF therapy. In a recent open-label study, trimetazidine improved functional class and ejection fraction (EF) in a range of patients with HF.1 The concept that such agents may optimize myocardial energy metabolism and allow more efficient production of energy from glucose than from free fatty acids (FFA) is "unique and conceptually appealing."2 Some problems, however, hamper the applicability of this hypothesis to the therapy of IDCM. First, no data are available to show decreased FFA oxidation in humans with HF. Rather, it is assumed that because a metabolic modulator such as trimetazidine acts in healthy rodent hearts by partially inhibiting long-chain 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A thiolase,3 the last enzyme involved in mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation, similar effects would be found in failing human hearts.1,2,4 Second, patients with IDCM may already have substantially downregulated FFA and upregulated glucose metabolism,5 especially when medicated with β-blockers that also induce myocardial metabolic switching from FFA to glucose oxidation.6,7 Third, in our recent study, when this hypothesis was tested by acutely decreasing the availability of FFA by administering acipimox8 to patients with IDCM, myocardial efficiency of work deteriorated further. Thus, acute limitation of FFA availability does not induce positive effects on cardiac performance in patients with HF.
Trimetazidine improves EF in patients with HF with or without diabetes1,4,9–11 and increases the ratios of phosphocreatine to adenosine triphosphate.12 In isolated working rat hearts, trimetazidine decreases the rate of palmitate oxidation up to 50%.3 However, no data are currently available on the effect of trimetazidine on myocardial FFA oxidative metabolism or the efficiency of work in patients with HF. Therefore, we used positron emission tomography (PET) combined with echocardiography to measure myocardial efficiency13,14 and substrate metabolism rates15 before and during treatment with trimetazidine in patients with IDCM and HF. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to test the hypothesis that trimetazidine improves cardiac function in IDCM by reducing FFA oxidation. We also reasoned that trimetazidine could improve insulin resistance in HF by extracardiac inhibition of FFA oxidation.16 A third specific goal was to investigate whether the effects of trimetazidine on cardiac function were additive to those of β-blockers.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intervention
After baseline investigations, patients were randomly assigned to receive either trimetazidine (35 mg BID, Vastarel, Laboratoires Servier France, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France; n=12) or placebo (n=7) in a single-blind manner in addition to their previous standard medication. The characteristics of the patient groups at baseline are summarized in Table 1. The groups were comparable in age, body mass index, and New York Heart Association functional class. At baseline, EF, left ventricular (LV) dimensions, and LV mass index were similar, whereas LV mass was significantly higher in the trimetazidine group. Both patient groups followed similar medication regimens. Clinical status and ECG were controlled, and blood samples were collected 1 and 2 months later. After 3 months of treatment, PET imaging and echocardiography were repeated. The compliance assessed by pill counting was >95% in both groups.
|
Positron Emission Tomography
Myocardial perfusion and oxidative and FFA metabolism were measured with [15O]H2O, [11C]acetate, and [11C]palmitate as PET tracers.8 Echocardiographic examinations were performed between [11C]acetate and [11C]palmitate scans. ECG, heart rate, and blood pressure were monitored throughout the sessions.
Echocardiographic evaluation was as before.8 Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was calculated as follows: SVR=MABP/(SVxHR), where MABP is mean arterial blood pressure, SV is stroke volume, and HR is heart rate. Relative wall thickness (WT) was calculated as follows: WT=(2xdiastolic PW)/LVEDD, where LVEDD is LV end-diastolic dimension and PW is the posterior wall. Wall stress (WS) was calculated from the following: WS=[BPx(LVESD/2)]/{2x[(systolic IVS+systolic PW)/2]}, where LVESD is LV end-systolic dimension and IVS is interventricular septum.
Measurement of Myocardial Perfusion and Oxidative and FFA Metabolism
The positron-emitting tracers [15O]H2O, [11C]acetate, and [11C]palmitate were produced and used as previously described.8,17–19 All PET data were corrected for dead time, decay, and measured photon attenuation. Images were processed with standard reconstruction algorithms.
Calculation of Myocardial Perfusion, Oxidative Metabolism, and Efficiency
Regional myocardial perfusion was calculated from a single-compartment model20 as previously described.8 In [11C]acetate PET studies, one region of interest ("horseshoe" region of interest) was drawn to cover the whole LV myocardium on an average of 4 midventricular transaxial planes. Monoexponential fitting was applied, and [11C]acetate clearance rate (Kmono) was calculated. Myocardial efficiency of forward work (the relationship between forward work and oxygen consumption) was estimated as follows: forward LV work per gram divided by global LV Kmono.
Calculation of Myocardial FFA Uptake Index and β-Oxidation Rate Constant
These calculations were done as described previously.8
Biochemical Analyses
Plasma glucose and lactate, serum free insulin, serum FFA, serum total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations were measured as previously described.8 Plasma HDL cholesterol was measured with the Roche enzymatic method for direct determination of HDL cholesterol on a Roche Modular P-analyzer (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). In addition, HDL cholesterol, HDL2 cholesterol, and HDL3 cholesterol also were determined using sequential polyethylene glycol precipitation21 followed by enzymatic cholesterol determination (Olympus System Reagent, Olympus Diagnostica GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). Homeostasis model assessment index was calculated as (fS-Insux fP-Glu)/22.5, where fS-Insu indicates fasting insulin and fP-Glu indicates fasting plasma glucose.22 The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration was calculated from the Friedewald formula.23 The extent of β-blockade was estimated with a β1-adrenoceptor occupancy test.24,25 Malondialdehyde concentration was measured as serum total (free and protein-bound) malondialdehyde as the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine derivative by high-performance liquid chromatography with 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane as the standard.26 Human adipocyte fatty acid–binding protein was measured by a sandwich enzyme immunoassay (Human FABP4 ELISA, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany). Lipoprotein(a) concentration was analyzed by a turbidimetric immunoassay (Wako Chemicals, Neuss, Germany). Plasminogen activator inhibitor was determined by an indirect enzymatic chromogenic assay (Trinity Biotech plc, Bray, Co Wicklow, Ireland).
Statistical Analysis
Values are expressed as mean±SD. Paired Student t test was used in normally distributed and signed-rank test was used in nonnormally distributed parameters to compare intragroup differences between baseline and follow-up. Linear regression analysis adjusted for baseline value and body mass index was used to compare the effects of trimetazidine and placebo on biochemical, echocardiographic, and PET parameters. Pearson (in normally distributed parameters) or Spearman (in nonnormally distributed parameters) correlation was used to calculate associations between continuous variables. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical tests were 2 sided and performed with SAS/STAT statistical analysis system (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).
The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Biochemical and Hemodynamic Variables
Biochemical variables were similar between the groups at baseline and remained unchanged during the therapy in the placebo group (Table 2). In the trimetazidine group, fasting plasma glucose concentrations decreased by 6% (P=0.047; 90% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, 0.1 to 0.7) and serum insulin concentrations decreased by 16% (P= 0.031; 90% CI for the difference, 0.4 to 4.4) during treatment compared with baseline; thus, homeostasis model assessment index decreased by 20% (P=0.027; 90% CI for the difference, 0.2 to 1.5). Moreover, fasting plasma HDL concentrations increased by 11% (P<0.001; 90% CI for the difference, 0.10 to 0.21) during treatment with trimetazidine, and further HDL analyzes revealed that both HDL2 and HDL3 levels increased significantly (P=0.041; 90% CI for the difference, 0.01 to 0.07; and P=0.036; 90% CI for the difference, 0.01 to 0.09, respectively). Fasting serum FFA, plasma lactate, fatty acid–binding protein, malondialdehyde, lipoprotein(a), and plasminogen activator inhibitor levels were unchanged. Between the groups, a trend was found for decreased homeostasis model assessment index in the trimetazidine group after therapy (P=0.093).
|
Hemodynamic variables, body weight, and body mass index (29.8 to 29.5 kg/m2 in the placebo group, 27.4 to 27.5 kg/m2 in the trimetazidine group) were similar between the groups at baseline and remained unchanged during treatment with trimetazidine and placebo. Systemic vascular resistance was unchanged in both groups, and no association with insulin resistance was detected (data not shown).
Myocardial Perfusion, Oxidative Metabolism, Work, and Efficiency of Forward Work
Myocardial perfusion and LV oxidative metabolism were comparable between the groups at baseline and remained unchanged in both groups during the medication (Table 3). Stroke volume, myocardial work per gram of tissue, and efficiency were similar between the groups at baseline and did not change after trimetazidine or placebo medication (Table 3).
|
Myocardial FFA Uptake and β-Oxidation Rate Constant
Myocardial FFA uptake and β-oxidation rate constant were comparable between the groups at baseline (Figure 1). During trimetazidine, myocardial β-oxidation rate constant decreased significantly compared with baseline (from 0.037±0.009 to 0.033±0.007 minute–1; P=0.034; 90% CI for the difference, 0.001 to 0.007; 10% reduction calculated from the individual means) and remained unchanged in the placebo group. Trimetazidine or placebo did not change myocardial FFA uptake index.
|
Echocardiographic Results
In the trimetazidine group, EF was increased by 15% during the treatment (from 30.9±8.5% to 34.8±12%), whereas in the placebo group, it decreased by 17% (from 37.5±8.4% to 31.9±12%; P=0.027; 90% CI for the difference between groups, 3.0 to 18; Figure 2 and Table 3). In the trimetazidine group, the extent of β1-adrenoceptor occupancy positively correlated with the relative change in EF (R=0.75, P=0.005; Figure 3A), whereas a similar association was not seen in the placebo group (R=–0.57, P=0.18; Figure 3B). Furthermore, in the trimetazidine group, interventricular septum increased compared with the placebo group (P=0.002; 90% CI for the difference, 0.7 to 2.1). However, no significant differences were detected in changes in relative wall thickness, LV mass, LV mass index, or LV volumes between the groups.
|
|
In the trimetazidine group, LV mass (P=0.039; 90% CI for the difference, 6.7 to 50) and LV mass index (P=0.043; 90% CI for the difference, 3.0 to 25) increased, whereas LV volumes remained unchanged compared with baseline. Furthermore, fractional shortening increased (P=0.023; 90% CI for the difference, 0.6 to 3.2) and wall stress decreased (P=0.028; 90% CI for the difference, 5.7 to 34) compared with baseline. In the placebo group, all the above-mentioned parameters remained unchanged except for LV end-systolic volume, which increased significantly compared with baseline (P=0.047; 90% CI for difference, 5.6 to 45).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because HF is an "energy-deprived" state,27 the energy-saving hypothesis is attractive. Could the reduction in FFA oxidation by only 10% support this hypothesis by switching from FFA to glucose oxidation? Completely changing from total FFA oxidation to only glucose (ie, becoming totally reliant on glucose for energy metabolism) would spare only 11% of the myocardial oxygen uptake.16 Thus, myocardial energy-saving metabolic switching from FFA to glucose is an unlikely main mechanism of trimetazidine action in the conditions of our study. However, we cannot exclude that partial inhibition of FFA oxidation might become a more powerful metabolic tool during oxygen wastage, as could occur during exercise and other adrenergic stresses in HF patients. Even if substantial adrenergic FFA-induced uncoupling28 and oxygen wastage were to occur to increase oxygen uptake by, for example, 40%, reducing it by 10% would still leave FFA accounting for 36% of the increased oxygen uptake. Thus, the energy-saving hypothesis becomes an unlikely mechanism.
An alternative hypothesis emphasizes a shift in the myocardial energy substrate preference from fatty acid toward glucose metabolism.29,30 Even the modest 10% decrease in FFA oxidation could significantly increase glycolytic flow through pyruvate dehydrogenase by the Randle31 mechanism and by anaplerosis of pyruvate to oxaloacetate and malate.32 The latter process could occur without change in the rate of acetate oxidation, our index of myocardial oxidative metabolism. Without direct measurement of pyruvate fates, the significance of these 2 routes of enhanced pyruvate entry into the citrate cycle remains speculative. However, increased oxidative glycolysis is likely as FFA falls, and the evidence of a preserved washout rate of acetate in this study supports the occurrence of the above metabolic shift. The consequences could include lessened harmful proton production33,34 and increased production of membrane-protective glycolytic ATP.35 These notions raise the interesting possibility that if carnitine palmitylransferase (CPT-1) inhibition by perhexiline or malonyl CoA was added to the modest inhibitory effects of trimetazidine, there could be an additional reinforcement in compensatory oxidative glycolysis.
The metabolic-shift hypothesis may also be supported by our data with β-blockade. In some6,7 but not all36 studies, β-blockers have induced myocardial metabolic shift from FFA to glucose oxidation, as suggested here for trimetazidine. We demonstrate that beneficial effects of trimetazidine treatment on LV function were observed in patients who were almost all receiving β-blocking agents (Table 1). Our novel finding was that the increase in EF achieved by trimetazidine therapy was associated with greater β1-adrenoceptor occupancy (Figure 3), suggesting synergistic clinical effects of β-blockade and trimetazidine. Trimetazidine and β-blockers partially inhibit different enzymes in the FFA path,3,37 so their metabolic effects could be additive. Specifically, whereas trimetazidine did not change total myocardial oxidative metabolism, β-blockade did, and that change was accompanied by increased efficiency of work.38
The basic mechanism that we favor is that both trimetazidine and β-blockade may improve insulin resistance, a well-established feature of HF16,39,40 and an independent risk factor for HF mortality.41 We found that trimetazidine improves whole-body insulin sensitivity and glucose control in insulin-resistant IDCM patients, extending to this condition the observation reported in diabetic patients with ischemic HF.11 This is of particular note given the high prevalence of diabetes in IDCM patients. In addition, insulin resistance increases myocardial FFA uptake and oxidation,42 and myocardial insulin resistance,30 ie, decreased myocardial glucose uptake, may worsen the energy depletion state, compromising cardiac function,43,44 as supported by its negative correlation with the LVEF.45 Conversely, enhanced glucose metabolism improves cardiac function in animal models44,46 and prevents the development of systolic dysfunction in patients with diabetes.47 Furthermore, improvement in whole-body insulin sensitivity by trimetazidine is accompanied by a metabolic shift from FFA to glucose oxidation in skeletal muscle during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia in diabetic HF patients.48 Overall, we postulate that such extracardiac metabolic changes may indirectly improve myocardial glucose metabolism and glycolysis, amplifying the effects mediated by the modest decrease in FFA oxidation observed in the cardiac tissue. Of note, the substrate shift should not be drastic because excess rapid deprivation of FFA is potentially harmful in HF, as shown in our previous study,8 whereas modest FFA inhibition, together with increased insulin sensitivity, as in the present study, appears more physiological and beneficial.
To the best of our knowledge, this data set provides the first evidence of a substantial trimetazidine-induced rise in HDL cholesterol levels. Overall, HDL levels were increased by 11%. This change was approximately equally distributed between the 2 main HDL subfractions. This result is important because HDL is 1 major marker of metabolic and cardiovascular risk and epidemiologically both HDL3 and HDL2 exert a powerful antioxidative and protective effect.49 The mechanisms explaining such findings by trimetazidine cannot be deduced from the present study but may be linked to the improved whole-body glucose homeostasis (although we could not demonstrate any association between these parameters in the present study). Trimetazidine-induced rise in HDL is potentially beneficial, but one should be very cautious in this interpretation because pharmacologically elevated HDL cholesterol levels do not necessarily reflect increased reverse cholesterol transport, enhanced antioxidative capacity, and consequently decreased atherogenesis.
Study Limitations
The study was only single blinded. However, the echocardiographer was blinded to the patients medications, and PET image analysis was performed mechanically by using the same regions of interest at baseline and follow-up, eliminating any influence of the analyst. The number of patients studied was small (19 patients) because of demanding imaging procedures but was large enough to identify significant changes in metabolic parameters in the repeated imaging setup. Because of practical limitations, myocardial glucose metabolism measurements could not be included in the present protocol because it would have required a 2-day study. All measurements were done only at rest. Further studies are warranted to study the effect of trimetazidine on myocardial glucose metabolism and to test exercise effects. In the mathematical models applied in the present study, complete quantification of various steps of FFA metabolism cannot be performed.50 In our model, the absolute mass of oxidized FFA cannot be measured. Rather, the estimated myocardial β-oxidation rate indicates the fraction of the intracellular FFA pool that is entering β-oxidation. However, the analysis used is very simple, robust, and reproducible. It requires neither metabolite analysis nor error-sensitive multiparameter curve fitting.
Conclusions
In patients with HF caused by IDCM, trimetazidine has positive cardiac and extracardiac effects. Modest inhibitory effects on FFA oxidation make the energy-sparing hypothesis unlikely and the metabolic-shift hypothesis more likely. Part of the positive effects of trimetazidine on cardiac function may be related to improved glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity. β-Blockade and trimetazidine have synergistic positive effects on the EF. Unexpectedly and importantly, HDL cholesterol increased. These findings suggest that further studies in HF testing combinations of metabolic modulators active at different sites and during exercise are warranted.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
The study was supported financially by the Ahvenainen Foundation, Turunen Foundation, Finnish Cultural Foundation, Instrumentarium Foundation, Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, and Turku University Hospital EVO grants.
Disclosures
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. deGoma EM, Vagelos RH, Fowler MB, Ashley EA. Emerging therapies for the management of decompensated heart failure: from bench to bedside. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48: 2397–2409.
3. Kantor PF, Lucien A, Kozak R, Lopaschuk GD. The antianginal drug trimetazidine shifts cardiac energy metabolism from fatty acid oxidation to glucose oxidation by inhibiting mitochondrial long-chain 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A thiolase. Circ Res. 2000; 86: 580–588.
4. Vitale C, Wajngaten M, Sposato B, Gebara O, Rossini P, Fini M, Volterrani M, Rosano GM. Trimetazidine improves left ventricular function and quality of life in elderly patients with coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25: 1814–1821.
5. Davila-Roman VG, Vedala G, Herrero P, de las Fuentes L, Rogers JG, Kelly DP, Gropler RJ. Altered myocardial fatty acid and glucose metabolism in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40: 271–277.
6. Wallhaus TR, Taylor M, DeGrado TR, Russell DC, Stanko P, Nickles RJ, Stone CK. Myocardial free fatty acid and glucose use after carvedilol treatment in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2441–2446.
7. Eichhorn EJ, Heesch CM, Barnett JH, Alvarez LG, Fass SM, Grayburn PA, Hatfield BA, Marcoux LG, Malloy CR. Effect of metoprolol on myocardial function and energetics in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24: 1310–1320.[Abstract]
8. Tuunanen H, Engblom E, Naum A, Någren K, Hesse B, Airaksinen KEJ, Nuutila P, Iozzo P, Ukkonen H, Opie LH, Knuuti J. Free fatty acid depletion acutely decreases cardiac work and efficiency in cardiomyopathic heart failure. Circulation. 2006; 114: 2130–2137.
9. Belardinelli R, Purcaro A. Effects of trimetazidine on the contractile response of chronically dysfunctional myocardium to low-dose dobutamine in ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2001; 22: 2164–2170.
10. Lu C, Dabrowski P, Fragasso G, Chierchia SL. Effects of trimetazidine on ischemic left ventricular dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 898–901.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Fragasso G, Piatti Md PM, Monti L, Palloshi A, Setola E, Puchetti P, Calori G, Lopaschuk GD, Margonato A. Short- and long-term beneficial effects of trimetazidine in patients with diabetes and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 2003; 146: E18.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Fragasso G, Perseghin G, De Cobelli F, Esposito A, Palloshi A, Lattuada G, Scifo P, Calori G, Del Maschio A, Margonato A. Effects of metabolic modulation by trimetazidine on left ventricular function and phosphocreatine/adenosine triphosphate ratio in patients with heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 942–948.
13. Beanlands RS, Armstrong WF, Hicks RJ, Nicklas J, Moore C, Hutchins GD, Wolpers HG, Schwaiger M. The effects of afterload reduction on myocardial carbon 11-labeled acetate kinetics and noninvasively estimated mechanical efficiency in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Nucl Cardiol. 1994; 1: 3–16.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Bengel FM, Permanetter B, Ungerer M, Nekolla S, Schwaiger M. Non-invasive estimation of myocardial efficiency using positron emission tomography and carbon-11 acetate: comparison between the normal and failing human heart. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000; 27: 319–326.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Schelbert HR, Henze E, Sochor H, Grossman RG, Huang SC, Barrio JR, Schwaiger M, Phelps ME. Effects of substrate availability on myocardial C-11 palmitate kinetics by positron emission tomography in normal subjects and patients with ventricular dysfunction. Am Heart J. 1986; 111: 1055–1064.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Ashrafian H, Frenneaux MP, Opie LH. Metabolic mechanisms in heart failure. Circulation. 2007; 116: 434–448.
17. Knuuti J, Takala TO, Någren K, Sipila H, Turpeinen AK, Uusitupa MI, Nuutila P. Myocardial fatty acid oxidation in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetologia. 2001; 44: 184–187.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Pike VW, Eakins MN, Allan RM, Selwyn AP. Preparation of [1-11C]acetate: an agent for the study of myocardial metabolism by positron emission tomography. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1982; 33: 505–512.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Padgett HC, Robinson GD, Barrio JR. [1-(11)C]palmitic acid: improved radiopharmaceutical preparation. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1982; 33: 1471–1472.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Iida H, Takahashi A, Tamura Y, Ono Y, Lammertsma AA. Myocardial blood flow: comparison of oxygen-15-water bolus injection, slow infusion and oxygen-15-carbon dioxide slow inhalation. J Nucl Med. 1995; 36: 78–85.
21. Leino A, Viikari J, Koskinen P, Irjala K. Problems with PEG-based precipitation methods in the determination of HDL2- and HDL3-cholesterol. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1987; 47: 705–708.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985; 28: 412–419.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972; 18: 499–502.[Abstract]
24. Kaila T. A sensitive radioligand binding assay for timolol in plasma. J Pharm Sci. 1991; 80: 296–299.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Vuori ML, Ali-Melkkila T, Kaila T, Iisalo E, Saari KM. Beta 1- and beta 2-antagonist activity of topically applied betaxolol and timolol in the systemic circulation. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1993; 71: 682–685.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Pilz J, Meineke I, Gleiter GH. Measurement of free and bound malondialdehyde in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography as the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine derivative. J Chromatogr B. 2000; 742: 315–325.[CrossRef]
27. Neubauer S. The failing heart: an engine out of fuel. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1140–1151.
28. Myrmel T, Forsdahl K, Larsen TS. Triacylglycerol metabolism in hypoxic, glucose-deprived rat cardiomyocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1992; 24: 855–868.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Lopaschuk GD, Stanley WC. Glucose metabolism in the ischemic heart. Circulation. 1997; 95: 313–315.
30. Witteles RM, Fowler MB. Insulin-resistant cardiomyopathy clinical evidence, mechanisms, and treatment options. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51: 93–102.
31. Randle PJ. Endocrine control of metabolism. Annu Rev Physiol. 1963; 25: 291–324.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Sorokina N, O'donnell JM, McKinney RD, Pound KM, Woldegiorgis G, LaNoue KF, Ballal K, Taegtmeyer H, Buttrick PM, Lewandowski ED. Recruitment of compensatory pathways to sustain oxidative flux with reduced carnitine palmitoyltransferase I activity characterizes inefficiency in energy metabolism in hypertrophied hearts. Circulation. 2007; 115: 2033–2041.
33. Dennis SC, Gevers W, Opie LH. Protons in ischemia: where do they come from; where do they go to? J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1991; 23: 1077–1086.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Lopaschuk GD, Wambolt RD, Barr RL. An imbalance between glycolysis and glucose oxidation is a possible explanation for the detrimental effects of high levels of fatty acids during aerobic reperfusion of ischemic hearts. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993; 264: 135–144.
35. Opie LH, Bricknell OL. Role of glycolytic flux in effect of glucose in decreasing fatty-acid-induced release of lactate dehydrogenase from isolated coronary ligated rat heart. Cardiovasc Res. 1979; 13: 693–702.
36. Bottcher M, Refsgaard J, Gotzsche O, Andreasen F, Nielsen TT. Effect of carvedilol on microcirculatory and glucose metabolic regulation in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 1388–1393.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Panchal AR, Stanley WC, Kerner J, Sabbah HN. Beta-receptor blockade decreases carnitine palmitoyl transferase I activity in dogs with heart failure. J Card Fail. 1998; 4: 121–126.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Beanlands RSB, Nahmias C, Gordon E, Coates G, deKemp R, Firnau G, Fallen E. The effects of β1-blockade on oxidative metabolism and the metabolic cost of ventricular work in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, positron-emission tomography study. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2070–2075.
39. Swan JW, Anker SD, Walton C, Godsland IF, Clark AL, Leyva F, Stevenson JC, Coats AJ. Insulin resistance in chronic heart failure: relation to severity and etiology of heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30: 527–532.[Abstract]
40. Witteles RM, Tang WH, Jamali AH, Chu JW, Reaven GM, Fowler MB. Insulin resistance in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a possible etiologic link. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 78–81.
41. Doehner W, Rauchhaus M, Ponikowski P, Godsland IF, von Haeling S, Okonko DO, Leyva F, Proudler AJ, Coats AJ, Anker S. Impaired insulin sensitivity as an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with stable chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 1019–1026.
42. Tuunanen H, Engblom E, Naum A, Scheinin M, Någren K, Airaksinen J, Nuutila P, Iozzo P, Ukkonen H, Knuuti J. Decreased myocardial free fatty acid uptake in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: evidence of relationship with insulin resistance and left ventricular dysfunction. J Card Fail. 2006; 12: 644–652.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Nikolaidis LA, Sturzu A, Stolarski C, Elahi D, Shen YT, Shannon RP. The development of myocardial insulin resistance in conscious dogs with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res. 2004; 61: 297–306.
44. Stroedter D, Schmidt T, Bretzel RG, Federlin K. Glucose metabolism and left ventricular dysfunction are normalized by insulin and islet transplantation in mild diabetes in the rat. Acta Diabetol. 1995; 32: 235–243.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Iozzo P, Chareonthaitawee P, Dutka D, Betteridge DJ, Ferrannini E, Camici PG. Independent association of type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease with myocardial insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2002; 51: 3020–3024.
46. Nikolaidis LA, Elahi D, Hentosz T, Doverspike A, Huerbin R, Zourelias L, Stolarski C, Shen YT, Shannon RP. Recombinant glucagon-like peptide-1 increases myocardial glucose uptake and improves left ventricular performance in conscious dogs with pacing-induced dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2004b; 110: 955–961.
47. Iribarren C, Karter AJ, Go AS, Ferrara A, Liu JY, Sidney S, Selby JV. Glycemic control and heart failure among adult patients with diabetes. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2668–2673.
48. Monti LD, Setola E, Fragasso G, Camisasca RP, Lucotti P, Galluccio E, Origgi A, Margonato A, Piatti P. Metabolic and endothelial effects of trimetazidine on forearm skeletal muscle in patients with type 2 diabetes and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Physiol Endocr Metab. 2006; 290: E54–E59.
49. Sakuma N, Saeki T, Yajima K, Hibino T, Yoshida T, Mizuno H, Mukai S, Sakata S, Kunimatsu M, Kimura G. Both HDL3 and HDL2 exert a powerful anti-oxidative and protective effect against acceleration of oxidative modification of LDL by ascorbic acid. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2005; 51: 75–79.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Bergmann SR, Weinheimer CJ, Markham J, Herrero P. Quantitation of myocardial fatty acid metabolism using PET. J Nucl Med. 1996; 37: 1723–1730.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Related Article:
Circulation 2008 118: 1217-1218.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. H. Opie and J. Knuuti The adrenergic-Fatty Acid load in heart failure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 27, 2009; 54(18): 1637 - 1646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. T. Bloomgarden The 6th Annual World Congress on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome Diabetes Care, October 1, 2009; 32(10): e114 - e121. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Bengel, T. Higuchi, M. S. Javadi, and R. Lautamaki Cardiac positron emission tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 30, 2009; 54(1): 1 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Bengel Clinical Cardiovascular Molecular Imaging J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2009; 50(6): 837 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Fox and H. W. Strauss One Step Closer to Imaging Vulnerable Plaque in the Coronary Arteries J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2009; 50(4): 497 - 500. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Scheuer Letter by Scheuer Regarding Article, "Trimetazidine, a Metabolic Modulator, Has Cardiac and Extracardiac Benefits in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy" Circulation, March 24, 2009; 119(11): e371 - e371. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tuunanen, J. Knuuti, and L. H. Opie Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Trimetazidine, a Metabolic Modulator, Has Cardiac and Extracardiac Benefits in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy" Circulation, March 24, 2009; 119(11): e372 - e372. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cosentino, L. Rydén, P. Francia, and L. G. Mellbin CHAPTER 14 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |