(Circulation. 2008;117:2912-2918.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Molecular Cardiology |
From Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Innere Medizin (C.F.H.M., K.W., S.W., C.H.C., B.K., G.N.) and Department of Epileptology (A.K., W.S.K.), Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, and Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg (J.W.), Germany.
Correspondence to Cornelius Mueller, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund Freud Str 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany. E-mail cornelius.mueller{at}ukb.uni-bonn.de
Received October 20, 2007; accepted March 13, 2008.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results— MRP1 is expressed abundantly in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Pharmacological inhibition of MRP1 via MK571 reduces angiotensin II–induced reactive oxygen species release by 59% (L012 fluorescence) in VSMCs. The release of reactive oxygen species after angiotensin II stimulation also is inhibited by blockade of the Cys-LT1 receptor with montelukast. Incubation of VSMCs with recombined LTC4 causes enhanced rates of reactive oxygen species and proliferation in wild-type and MRP1–/– VSMCs. Accordingly, the LTC4 release in the cell culture supernatant of MRP1–/– VSMCs is significantly decreased compared with wild-type cells. To extend our observations to the in vivo situation, atherosclerosis-prone apolipoprotein E–deficient mice on a high-cholesterol diet were treated with placebo, the MRP1 inhibitor MK571, or the Cys-LT1 receptor inhibitor montelukast for 6 weeks. Treatment with MK571 or montelukast reduced vascular reactive oxygen species production, significantly improved endothelial function, and ameliorated atherosclerotic plaque generation by 52% and 61%, respectively.
Conclusions— These findings indicate that MRP1 and LTC4 exert proatherosclerotic effects and that both MRP1 and LTC4 are potentially promising targets for atheroprotective therapy.
Key Words: angiotensin atherosclerosis interleukins muscle, smooth multidrug resistance-associated proteins
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Perspective p 2918
So far, the underlying intracellular mechanisms of the reported effects remain unclear. An increased turnover rate of the glutathione redox system has been discussed as the most important effect of MRP1 depletion/blockade.2,3 Glutathione is one of the most abundant thiol antioxidants in cells. It is involved in cellular division, protein and DNA synthesis, maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis, and regulation of apoptosis. Catalyzed by the enzyme glutathione peroxidase, glutathione can be easily converted to its oxidized form (GSSG). GSSG in turn can be either exported out of the cytoplasm via MRP1 or regenerated to glutathione by the enzyme glutathione reductase.5 Either accumulation or increased export of GSSG leads to cellular apoptosis. We have recently demonstrated that MRP1 blockade reduces oxidative stress by increasing the activity of the glutathione reductase in human aortic endothelial cells.3 However, this moderate upregulation may only partially explain the observed vasoprotective effects in an in vivo situation. Therefore, we hypothesized that additional intracellular mechanisms contribute to the atheroprotective effects of MRP1 blockade or depletion.
LTC4, the conjugation product of glutathione and leukotriene A4, is a mediator of inflammation, increases postcapillary permeability, causes vasoconstriction, and induces oxidative stress.6 LTC4 is metabolized in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), macrophages, and leukocytes.6,7 In VSMCs, LTC4 release can be triggered by Ang II.8
LTC4 mediates its biological effects by binding to the Cys-LT1 receptor. Because the Cys-LT1 receptor is located on the cellular membrane of VSMCs, transport of LTC4 from the intracellular to the extracellular compartment is necessary to promote LTC4 effects via its receptor. It has been shown that LTC4 displays a high affinity to MRP1. Thus, we hypothesize that MRP1 could be important for atherogenesis and that inside-outside transport of LTC4 could resemble a relevant mechanism.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture
Confluent VSMCs of either rat or mouse origin were used. Cells were prepared as published previously.9 Rat VSMCs were isolated from rat thoracic aorta (strain, male Sprague-Dawley; age, 6 to 10 weeks old; Charles River GmbH, Sulzfeld, Germany); mouse VSMCs were isolated from mouse thoracic aortas of male FVB and male MRP1–/– mice purchased from Taconic Animal Models (Germantown, NY). Passages 3 through 10 were used for the experiments performed. Cell culture media and materials were obtained from Gibco (Carlsbad, Calif).
Detection of MRP1 mRNA and Protein
MRP1 mRNA and protein were detected by polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting according to protocols published previously.3
Western Analysis
To detect MRP1 in mouse VSMCs, we used the monoclonal antibody MRPr1 (Kamiya) at a dilution of 1:100. Actin immunoblotting was used to normalize for loading variations.
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA (3 µg) was reverse transcribed using random primers and a SuperScript III kit (Invitrogen). DNA was amplified with the following primers for MRP1 (forward, 5'- CAGAGCAGGAGCAGGATGCAGAGGA-3'; reverse, 5'-GGAACCAGCGCGCGGÁCACATGGT-3').
Determination of ROS production
Intracellular ROS production in VSMCs was measured by L012 fluorescence as described previously.10 To perform these measurements, VSMCs were cultivated in 96-well plates until they reached confluence. The cells were then stimulated for up to 12 hours with the different substances indicated in the Results section. Cells were then harvested (trypsin) and resuspended in equal volumes of Krebs-HEPES-buffer with 100 µmol/L L012. Chemiluminescence was assessed after an incubation for 5 minutes over a time course of 15 minutes in a scintillation counter (Lumat LB 9501, Berthold, Bad Wildbad, Germany) in 1-minute intervals.
Determination of LTC4 Release of VSMCs
For determination of LTC4 release in cell culture supernatant of VSMCs, the leukotriene C4/D4/E4 Biotrak assay (Amersham) was used. VSMCs were cultured in a 96-well plate until they reached confluence. The cells were then incubated with the different substances (eg, MK571/montelukast) for 12 hours as indicated in Results. Afterward, 200 µL cell culture supernatant was collected and added to the 96-well plate provided with the kit for 2 hours. The following steps were performed according to the manufacturers protocol.
Animal Experiments
Twelve-week-old apolipoprotein E–deficient (ApoE–/–) mice were fed a Western diet for 6 weeks. The animals were treated with either MK571, a pharmacological antagonist of MRP1 (5 mg · kg–1 · d–1), or montelukast (1 mg · kg–1 · d–1). Placebo-treated animals served as the control group. The mice were killed, and the aortas were excised. The vessel was then immersed in chilled buffer containing (in mmol/L) NaCl 118.0, CaCl2 2.5, KCl 4.73, MgCl2 1.2, KH2PO4 1.2, NaHCO3 25.0, NaEDTA 0.026, and D(+)glucose 5.5, pH 7.4. Perivascular adipose tissue was carefully removed. Rings (3 mm) were mounted in organ chamber baths filled with the described buffer (37°C, continuously aerated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2) and attached to a force transducer, and isometric tension was recorded. The vessels were gradually stretched over 60 minutes to a resting tension of 10 mN, which was maintained throughout the experiment, and were allowed to equilibrate for another 30 minutes. Drugs were added in increasing concentrations to obtain cumulative concentration-response curves: KCl 20 and 40 mmol/L, Ang II 1 nmol/L to 1 µmol/L, phenylephrine 1 nmol/L to 10 µmol/L, carbachol 10 nmol/L to 100 µmol/L, and nitroglycerin 1 nmol/L to 10 µmol/L. The drug concentration was increased when vasoconstriction or relaxation was completed. Drugs were washed out before the next substance was added. Atherosclerotic lesion development was determined as published previously. Sections of the aortic root were embedded in Tissue Tek optical coherence tomography embedding medium, snap-frozen, and stored at –80°C. Samples were sectioned on a Leica cryostat and placed on poly-L-lysine–coated slides for analysis. Sections of the aortic root were then stained with Oil Red O and analyzed with software measuring the atherosclerotic lesion area in relation to the lumen of the vessel.
Statistical Analysis
Values are expressed as mean±SEM and were compared between groups by use of ANOVA. The Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test was performed when significance is indicated. For comparisons between 2 groups, Students t test was used.
All authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Ang II Causes LTC4 Release in VSMCs
We wondered whether MRP1-associated ROS generation was connected to LTC4 levels in the cell culture supernatant of cultured VSMCs. We stimulated wild-type cells and MRP1–/– cells with Ang II (10–6 mol/L) for 16 hours and determined the level of LTC4 in the cell culture media (Figure 2). Ang II stimulation resulted in an increase in LTC4 of 75±15% in wild-type cells and had no effect in MRP1–/– cells. This finding indicates that Ang II induces inside-outside transport of LTC4.
|
LTC4 Leads to ROS Generation in VSMCs: Blockade of the LTC4 Receptor and MRP1 Inhibits ROS Generation
VSMCs were grown to confluence and then incubated with LTC4, Ang II, MK571, and montelukast, a pharmacological Cys-LT1 receptor inhibitor. After a 12-hour stimulation, ROS release was determined by L012 chemiluminescence (Figure 3A). Ang II (10–6 mol/L) and LTC4 (10–6 mol/L) stimulation resulted in enhanced ROS generation by 134±30.4% and 107±36.2%, respectively, above the level of the control cells. Incubation with MK571 (5 µmol/L) and montelukast (10–6 µmol/L) alone did not affect ROS release. MK571 did not prevent the LTC4-induced oxidative stress; montelukast inhibited the LTC4-caused release of ROS. These findings demonstrate that MRP1-mediated LTC4 export caused ROS generation in VSMCs after stimulation with Ang II. We performed a similar experiment in MRP1–/– cells to exclude nonspecific effects of MK571 (Figure 3B). Stimulation with LTC4 increased ROS production, whereas stimulation with Ang II showed no effect. Incubation with Montelukast and coincubation with Montelukast and LTC4 did not alter the ROS level in MRP1–/– VSMCs.
|
Pharmacological MRP1 Inhibition and Cys-LT1 Receptor Blockade Affect ROS Production, Endothelial Function, and Atherogenesis in ApoE–/– Mice In Vivo
To extend our findings to the in vivo setting, 3-month-old atherosclerosis-prone ApoE–/– mice receiving a cholesterol-enriched diet for 6 weeks were treated with MK571 (5 mg · kg–1 · d–1), montelukast (1 mg · kg–1 · d–1), or placebo. All mice were fed a high-fat, cholesterol-rich diet containing 21% fat, 19.5% casein, and 1.25% cholesterol.
The animals were then killed, aortas were excised, and endothelial function was analyzed in organ chamber experiments. Pharmacological inhibition of MRP1 and Cys-LT1 receptor inhibition reduced ROS production (L012 chemiluminescence) by 55±10% and resulted in a significantly improved endothelial function compared with placebo-treated controls (Figure 4). Endothelium-independent relaxation (nitroglycerin) remained unchanged. Application of MK571 or montelukast improved endothelial function to almost identical extents. Furthermore, we analyzed the development of atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic sinus (Figure 5). Treatment with MK571 diminished the size of atherosclerotic plaques (Oil Red O staining) by 52±11%. Treatment with montelukast showed a similar effect, with a reduction of 61±10%.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
VSMCs present the majority of cells within the vascular wall. Therefore, a relevant expression of MRP1 in VSMCs was a likely finding. It was also likely that the glutathione redox system would be less important in VSMCs because these cells are less exposed to sudden oxidative stress and show different coping mechanisms and physiological reactions like the induction of cellular growth when exposed to ROS. One major trigger of ROS generation in VSMCs is Ang II.13 Widder et al4 investigated the effect of Ang II infusion in MRP1–/– mice and reported a variety of effects connected with MRP1 in respect to vascular function. Among them are a lower blood pressure, reduced production of ROS, and better endothelial function in MRP1–/– animals compared with control mice. We hypothesized that besides the already reported effects of MRP1 inhibition on the glutathione/GSSG system, alternative mechanisms should contribute to the observed effects in VSMCs.
Among the substrates with high affinity for MRP1 is LTC4. LTC4 mediates inflammatory reactions in respiratory tissue, and it is instrumental in the pathogenesis and treatment of asthma.14 In respiratory tissue, LTC 4 induces ROS production via EGF receptor transactivation and ERK1/2 phosphorylation.15 A potential connection between MRP1 and LTC4 was supported by observations in MRP1–/– mice showing an insusceptibility of MRP1–/– mice to infection with pneumococci combined with dramatically improved survival.16 The major source of LTC4 in human tissue is leukocytes, but LTC4 also can be generated and released by VSMCs.8 It was therefore reasonable to assume that at least part of the observed antiatherosclerotic effects could be based on reduced generation and release of LTC4 by VSMCs. Especially in early stages of atherosclerotic lesion development, this VSMC-driven LTC4 release might be of importance. In advanced stages, the major source of LTC4 is most likely macrophages. In our experimental setting, Ang II stimulation of VSMCs resulted in an increased LTC4 release. This finding is in accordance with the results of Luchtefeld et al,17 who demonstrated that Ang II enhances leukotriene formation in VSMCs via induction of the lipoxygenase 5. Leukotriene formation resulted in an increased ROS production. The study presented here demonstrates that Ang II induces intracellular ROS formation via induction of LTC4, which is transported to its extracellular lying receptor via MRP1. In MRP1–/– VSMCs, Ang II was unable to induce either LTC4 or ROS generation, indicating that inside-outside transport of LTC4 via MRP1 is necessary for Ang II–induced ROS production. In this study, we measured ROS mainly by determining L012 chemiluminescence, which represents the intracellular ROS generation. We did not determine extracellular sources of ROS, eg, extracellular superoxide dismutase, which might also be important. The effects of MRP1 inhibition and reduced leukotriene formation on extracellular ROS production need to be determined in future studies.
Our in vivo data support the thesis that LTC4-mediated production of ROS is an essential part of the physiological reactions in VSMCs after Ang II stimulation. Inhibition of MRP1 or blocking of the Cys-LT1 receptor showed antiatherogenic effects in ApoE–/– mice. Our findings imply that the proinflammatory reactions caused by Ang II within the vascular wall are substantially connected to Ang II–mediated cytokine release. As shown in the online Data Supplement, Ang II stimulation may initiate an intrinsic vicious cycle, starting with the generation of LTC4 in VSMCs. In a second step, LTC4 is transported to the extracellular compartment via export by MRP1. The Cys-LT1 receptor, located on the extracellular membrane of VSMCs, can be stimulated by released LTC4. This in turn triggers the production of ROS and the further generation of leukotrienes, promoting finally a self-sustaining process. There are 2 potential ways to interfere with this cycle. The first way is to block MRP1 and therefore interrupt the release of LTC4. The second way to interrupt LTC4-mediated effects is the blockade of the Cys-LT1 receptor. Montelukast (Singulair) is a Cys-LT1 receptor antagonist that is used for asthma treatment. So far, the effect of montelukast on vascular function has remained undetermined. We now demonstrate that pharmacological inhibition of MRP1 and Cys-LT1 receptor prevents Ang II–induced ROS production, improves endothelial function, and reduces atherosclerotic plaque formation in ApoE–/– knockout mice. This mechanism also might be of importance in humans.
Taken together, our findings indicate a decisive role of MRP1 in mediating LTC4 transport, intracellular redox homeostasis, and finally vascular function and atherogenesis. Moreover, MRP1 blockade and Cys-LT1 receptor blockade may provide new and interesting targets for the treatment of endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
Dr Mueller was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MU 1731/1-1) and the BONFOR program of the Universitätsklinikum Bonn (O-109.0020). Dr Widder was supported by the Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina (BMBF-LPD 9901/8-97).
Disclosures
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Related Article:
Circulation 2008 117: 2841-2843.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |