| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2008;117:2626-2636.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Heart Failure |
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (A.L.M., E.T., C.G.T., K.C., D.B., G.C., E.A.K., M.M., K.G., N.P., H.C.C., D.A.K.) and Department of Pathology (M.K.H.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health (S.B.), John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md: Department of Physiology, New York Medical College, Valhalla (M.S.W.); Radiation Biology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (J.B.M.); and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (K.M.C., N.J.A.).
Correspondence to David A. Kass, MD, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Division of Cardiology, Ross Research Bldg, Room 858, 720 Rutland Ave, Baltimore, MD 21205. E-mail dkass{at}jhmi.edu
Received September 4, 2007; accepted March 7, 2008.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results— C57/Bl6 mice underwent transverse aortic constriction for 4 weeks, increasing cardiac mass (190%) and diastolic dimension (144%), lowering ejection fraction (–46%), and triggering NOS uncoupling and oxidative stress. Oral BH4 was then administered for 5 more weeks of pressure overload. Without reducing loading, BH4 reversed hypertrophy and fibrosis, recoupled endothelial NOS, lowered oxidant stress, and improved chamber and myocyte function, whereas untreated hearts worsened. If BH4 was started at the onset of pressure overload, it did not suppress hypertrophy over the first week when NOS activity remained preserved even in untreated transverse aortic constriction hearts. However, BH4 stopped subsequent remodeling when NOS activity was otherwise declining. A broad antioxidant, Tempol, also reduced oxidant stress yet did not recouple NOS or reverse worsened hypertrophy/fibrosis from sustained transverse aortic constriction. Microarray analysis revealed very different gene expression profiles for both treatments. BH4 did not enhance net protein kinase G activity. Finally, transgenic mice with enhanced BH4 synthesis confined to endothelial cells were unprotected against pressure overload, indicating that exogenous BH4 targeted myocytes and fibroblasts.
Conclusions— NOS recoupling by exogenous BH4 ameliorates preexisting advanced cardiac hypertrophy/fibrosis and is more effective than a less targeted antioxidant approach (Tempol). These data highlight the importance of myocyte NOS uncoupling in hypertrophic heart disease and support BH4 as a potential new approach to treat this disorder.
Key Words: antioxidants heart failure hypertrophy nitric oxide synthase reactive oxygen species remodeling therapeutics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Perspective p 2636
A major cause of eNOS uncoupling is depletion and/or oxidation of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4).12,13 BH4 is an obligate cofactor for the 3 aromatic amino acid hydroxylases,14 and insufficiency of phenylalanine hydroxylase causes phenylketonuria, a genetic disorder characterized by progressive mental retardation. Affected individuals must follow a phenylalanine-restricted diet, and BH4 replacement therapy can reduce phenylalanine levels and appears to be useful for treating a substantial number of these patients.15 BH4 also is required for normal NOS function (reviewed elsewhere16). It is synthesized de novo from guanosine triphosphate (GTP),17 with the rate-limiting enzyme being GTP cyclohydrolase-1 (GCH). Models in which GCH is genetically enhanced in endothelial cells show suppressed diabetic and atherosclerotic vasculopathy.9,10 Effective BH4 levels also depend on redox state because the oxidized form of BH4 (BH2) does not serve as an NOS cofactor. BH4 levels decline in pressure-overload hypertrophy in conjunction with NOS uncoupling,11 but whether BH4 supplementation can treat already established advanced disease and whether this involves targeted eNOS recoupling are unknown. Here, we demonstrate that exogenous BH4 can indeed recouple NOS and reverse advanced hypertrophy/dilation more effectively than a less specific antioxidant strategy.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endothelial GTP Cyclohydrolase Transgene Overexpression
GTP cyclohydrolase transgenic (GCH-Tg) mice (n=24) and nontransgenic control littermates (n=16)9 were subjected to 12 weeks of TAC. Age-matched sham controls also were generated. Serial echocardiography and final sacrifice tissue analysis were performed.
Cardiac Function and Geometry
In vivo cardiac geometry and function was serially assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (Acuson Sequoia C256, 13-MHz transducer, Siemens Medical Systems, Malvern, Pa) in conscious mice. M-mode left ventricular (LV) end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions were averaged from 3 to 5 beats, and data were analyzed by investigators blinded to heart condition as described.11 In a subset of mice, LV function was assessed by pressure-volume relations (SPR 839, Millar Instruments Inc, Houston, Tex) in anesthetized animals as described.11
Histology
Myocardium was fixed in 10% formalin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid–Schiff methenimine silver, or Massons trichrome to determine myocyte cross-sectional diameter (mean, 40 cells from 3 slices in 4 to 5 different hearts) and interstitial fibrosis. Fibrosis was scored 0 to 3 by a pathologist blinded to heart condition.
Whole-Cell Myocyte Shortening and Calcium Transients
Adult myocytes were isolated from left ventricles, and cell shortening and calcium transient changes (Indo-1-AM) were determined by fluorescence microscopy (Diaphot 200, Nikon, Inc, Melville, NY) equipped with image/analysis (IonOptix, MyoCam, Milton, Mass) as described.20 Data were assessed in control and 9-week TAC hearts with or without BH4 treatment.
eNOS Monomer-to-Dimer Ratio and Activity
Cold SDS-PAGE Western blot analysis was performed in self-made 7% to 4% SDS-Tris gels run overnight on ice and then transferred for 3 hours to nitrocellulose membranes. Primary eNOS antibody (1:350, Santa Cruz Technology, Inc, Santa Cruz, Calif) was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce, Rockford, Ill). NOS activity was measured from myocardial homogenates (80 µg protein) by C14 arginine to citrulline conversion (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif).11
cGMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Activity
cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG)-1 activity was assayed from whole-heart protein lysates by ELISA (CycLex-PKG assay kit, MBL, Woburn, Mass) and immunoblot for PKG-phosphorylated vasodilator-stimulated protein with a monoclonal antibody to pS239 vasodilator-stimulated protein (Alexis, Lausen, Switzerland) at 1:1000 dilution.20
Superoxide Determination
Myocardial superoxide was measured by dihydroethidine fluorescent microtopography and lucigenin-enhanced chemiluminescence. Fresh-frozen 8-µm LV slices were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with dihydroethidine (2 µmol/L, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif) and fluorescence imaged as described.11 For lucigenin analysis, fresh-frozen myocardium was homogenized and centrifuged at 4000 RPM for 30 seconds; lucigenin (5 µmol/L) and NADPH (100 µmol/L) were added to the supernatant; and chemiluminescence was measured by scintillation counter (LS6000IC, Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, Calif) at 37°C. Data are reported as counts per minute per 1 mg protein after background subtraction.
Microarray Analysis
Microarrays for 9 weeks of TAC with and without delayed BH4 and Tempol treatment were performed with the Mouse Genome 430 2.0 array chip (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Calif). Details are provided in Methods section of the online Data Supplement.
Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed with an Applied Biosystems Prism 7900HT Sequence Detection System with the TaqMan universal polymerase chain reaction master mix according to the manufacturers specifications (Applied Biosystems Inc, Foster City, Calif). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the different groups (SigmaStat, Systat Software, Inc, San Jose, Calif). Details are provided in the supplemental Methods.
Myocardial BH4/BH2 Analysis
Myocardial BH4 and BH2 levels were determined by direct high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of frozen tissue homogenates. Details are provided in the supplemental Methods.
Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as mean±SEM. Group data were compared by use of 1- and 2-way ANOVA. Nonparametric data were analyzed with the Kruskall-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Reported probability values were Bonferroni or Tukey test adjusted for multiple comparisons (3 to 5 comparisons, depending on the data analyzed). The minimum sample size was 4 for any group; other specific details are provided in the text.
The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
BH4 Prevents Progressive Deterioration of Myocardial Function
Pressure-volume relations were obtained to better assess LV function (Figure 2A and the Table). Rest conditions are reflected by the most rightward pressure-volume loop of each set. At 4 weeks of TAC, hearts were dilated and had increased end-systolic elastance (arrow) typical of hypertrophy. After 9 weeks of TAC, they became markedly dilated and had depressed function (reduced slope [Ees] and right shift of end-systolic pressure-volume relation; the Table). These changes were prevented by BH4, with end-systolic pressure-volume relations maintaining their position at 4 weeks of TAC (ie, onset of treatment; summary data on the right and the Table). Importantly, BH4 did not alter ventricular afterload assessed by peak systolic pressure (Figure 2A, top left) or total resistive load (P=0.3; data not shown).
|
|
To further assess the effect of BH4 on myocardial function, myocytes were isolated from treated and untreated 9-week-TAC hearts (Figure 2B). The rate of sarcomere shortening and relengthening improved with BH4 treatment and was associated with higher peak calcium transients and a faster transient decay, consistent with improved calcium cycling.
BH4 Recouples eNOS
As previously reported, 3 to 4 weeks of TAC results in NOS uncoupling indexed by eNOS homodimer instability, reduced Ca2+-dependent NOS activity, and increased NOS-derived ROS.11 Here, we show data for homodimer instability (higher ratio of monomers to dimers in cold SDS nonreducing gels; Figure 3A). Untreated 9-week-TAC mice had persistent instability, with a marked decline in NOS activity and increased NOS-dependent ROS generation (Figure 3B). These behaviors were restored to normal with BH4 treatment. Total eNOS (monomer plus dimer) was unchanged.
|
In 6 additional animals, BH4 treatment was initiated at the onset of TAC and continued for 9 weeks. After 1 week of TAC, hearts developed nondilated hypertrophy, which was not suppressed by BH4; however, the progressive rise in LV mass and chamber dilation and the decline in EF observed thereafter in controls were prevented by BH4 treatment (Figure 3C; P<0.001 for treatment, time, and treatment-by-time interaction for each parameter based on 2 way-ANOVA). This result was consistent with the time course of reduced NOS activity. After 1 week of TAC, in vitro NOS activity remained at control levels, whereas it declined by
50% after 3 weeks (Figure 3D), consistent with our earlier report,11 and even more by 9 weeks (Figure 3B). Thus, BH4 became effective once NOS activity otherwise started to decline.
Effect of BH4 on PKG Activity
Improved eNOS activity could potentially suppress hypertrophy by stimulating downstream PKG.18,21 PKG activity rose after 9 weeks of TAC as previously reported with 3 weeks of TAC18 but was not further enhanced by BH4 treatment (Figure 3E). This was demonstrated by both in vitro activity and phosphorylated vasodilator–stimulated protein immunoblot (Figure 3E, top and bottom, respectively).
Antioxidant Effect of BH4 and Comparison With Tempol
Another potential mechanism of BH4 efficacy is its targeting upstream signaling from NO, the NO-ROS interaction, or ROS itself. Dihydroethidium fluorescent microtopography (Figure 4A) revealed marked ROS generation at 4 and 9 weeks of TAC that fell to nearly control levels with delayed BH4 treatment. This result was confirmed by lucigenin chemiluminescence (Figure 4B).
|
Given this potent antioxidant effect, we tested whether BH4 therapeutic benefits could be duplicated with a broad antioxidant. With the same delayed-treatment TAC protocol, mice received control diet or food premixed with the nitroxide Tempol (30 to 50 mg/d), a superoxide dismutase mimetic that also suppresses hydroxyl, hydrogen peroxide, and other radicals.22 Both Tempol and BH4 were equally effective in scavenging superoxide in vitro (Figure 4C, left), and Tempol reduced myocardial superoxide potently and similarly to BH4 in TAC hearts (Figure 4C, right; see also Figure 4B). Yet, Tempol did not reverse or prevent progressive hypertrophy (Figure 4D) or affect fibrosis from sustained TAC, and myocyte size declined less than with BH4 (Figure 4E). Tempol increased EF (Figure 4D) by reducing end-systolic dimensions (3.8±0.4 versus 2.8±0.4 mm; P<0.05), so some systolic improvement resulted, although it did not restore eNOS coupling (Figure 4F).
To further probe differences between these therapies, gene-expression microarrays were performed (Table I of the online Data Supplement). Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed on a subset of genes to confirm array results. The 9-week TAC principally stimulated genes controlling collagen synthesis/degradation and tissue growth factor-β signaling and reduced the expression of genes controlling metabolism. Intriguingly, none of these were significantly offset by BH4 or Tempol. Instead, BH4 increased the expression of genes regulating lipid metabolism (eg, fatty-acid-binding protein 1, apolipoprotein A-1, major urinary protein 1,2) and kallikrein signaling (eg, plasminogen, fibrinogen). Only 8% of these genes were similarly affected by BH4 alone (without TAC), and none of these related to lipid metabolism. A more complete list of BH4 modified genes is provided in supplemental Table II. Tempol altered virtually none of the same genes as BH4 but modestly lowered expression of a different set, eg, phospholipase C β4,
1, AMP-kinase
2, GSK3β, mitogen-activated protein-4k3, PKG-1, and flavin-containing monooxygenase 2 (the only gene with similar changes from BH4). Thus, suppressing TAC-induced ROS, more broadly or by a NOS-targeted strategy, resulted in very different gene profiling and phenotype.
Nonendothelial BH4 Is Central for Its Antihypertrophic Effects
Exogenous BH4 can diffuse into myocytes, fibroblasts, and the vascular endothelium, and because endothelial cells contain 80% of eNOS in the myocardium, this might be the presumed primary target. To test this, we studied mice that overexpressed GCH only in endothelial cells by use of a Tei-2 promoter.9 GCH is the rate-limiting enzyme involved in de novo BH4 synthesis, and in this model, isolated myocyte BH4 levels are unaltered,9 whereas total myocardial levels rise
4 fold (5.2±3.5 to 19.3±4.9 pmol/mg protein), similar to the rise achieved by exogenous BH4 (40.5±19.1 pmol/mg protein). Intriguingly, chamber hypertrophy, fibrosis, myocyte enlargement, heart function, and dilation changed identically during 12 weeks of TAC in the hearts of GCH-Tg and littermate controls (Figure 5). However, superoxide declined in GCH-Tg myocardium (P<0.05), suggesting a role of endothelial NOS uncoupling to myocardial ROS that is less associated with cardiac hypertrophic remodeling. These data indicate that the effectiveness of BH4 to ameliorate pressure-overload cardiac dysfunction and remodeling lies in its targeting of NOS uncoupling in myocytes (and perhaps fibroblasts) rather than in the endothelium.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NOS uncoupling impairs NO synthesis and its downstream effecter signaling (ie, cGMP and PKG) while concomitantly increasing ROS generation. Both aspects can trigger myocardial hypertrophy and remodeling.3 Myocardial PKG signaling coupled to natriuretic peptides25,26 or modulation of cGMP catabolism18 blunts cardiac hypertrophy and can improve heart function. This is thought to be due in part to suppression of calcineurin and nuclear factor of activated T-cell activation21; other pathways are likely important also.18,27 Because NO stimulates soluble guanylate cyclase to generate cGMP and thus activate PKG, improved NOS function by BH4 could potentially involve this antihypertrophic mechanism. Yet, enhanced PKG activity was not observed, and there are several potential reasons for this. BH4 did not hyperstimulate NOS but returned its activity to normal control levels for which corresponding PKG activation is typically low. PKG activity could have already been maximal, although this is unlikely because enhancing cGMP via PDE5a inhibition (eg, sildenafil) during TAC can potently activate PKG further.18 PKG also was activated more with 9 weeks of TAC alone over control (similar to results after 3 weeks of TAC18) despite reduced NOS activity, indicating that alternative mechanisms such as cGMP generated by natriuretic peptides (both ANP and BNP expression rose with TAC; see supplemental Table I) or oxidant stress28 could have played a role. Although BH4 therapy might lower one source such as oxidant stress, it could raise another (ie, eNOS), leaving net PKG activation unchanged.
An alternative to cGMP/PKG mechanisms is the modulation of NO and NO-ROS interactions by BH4. This would include S-nitrosylation, which can alter cardiac contractile regulation,29 or local interaction of NOS-derived ROS with NO (forming peroxynitrite)30 perhaps in a particularly vulnerable subcellular compartment. Recoupling NOS would steer superoxide-derived ROS formation away from peroxide, which may be important. Restored NOS activity would not itself be expected to stimulate peroxynitrite in the absence of oxidant stress because this is not observed in normal hearts, and if anything, BH4 appears to lower peroxynitrite in oxidant stress disorders.31
The present data support a growing notion that ROS signaling is compartmentalized32 and that targeting specific oxidant generators may be more efficacious than broader antioxidant scavengers. Although both Tempol and BH4 provided similar in vitro and tissue (lucigenin) antioxidant effects, their effects on hypertrophy, fibrosis, and NOS recoupling were quite different. This is not likely due to an insufficient Tempol dose because the dose used was fairly high (equivalent to 58 mmol/L).19 It also is the highest dose that mice will tolerate in their food because of the taste. Although clinical trials testing broad antioxidant strategies have been fairly unimpressive to date,4,5 this may be analogous to continuously applying sponges to blot up water from an open faucet versus turning the faucet off. The latter, ie, suppressing a strategic ROS source, might well provide more effective results.
There are other oxidant sources in the heart besides uncoupled NOS, although the impact of their inhibition on hypertrophic remodeling remains unclear. Xanthine oxidase–derived free radicals have been found to play a role in dilated cardiac failure, and allopurinol and its active metabolite oxypurinol, which block xanthine oxidase, also improve myocardial efficiency, NO-ROS balance, and myofilament calcium sensitization.33 However, in clinical trials, these drugs did not improve symptoms or exercise capacity.34 Furthermore, their role in hypertrophic disease has not been established. NADPH oxidases also have been widely studied.35 Genetic studies in mice lacking NOX2 (gp91phox) found hypertrophic responses resulting from aortic banding similar to those in controls36,37 but somewhat less fibrosis. Other NOX oxidases such as NOX4 may be important, although this remains to be confirmed. Importantly, small-molecule inhibitors remain scant, and none are clinically viable or sufficiently selective at present. Finally, ROS leakage linked to mitochondrial electron transport may also contribute to cardiac failure,38 although the involvement with pressure-overload hypertrophy remains to be established.
This study has several limitations. Although our data demonstrate that BH4 restores NOS coupling even in advanced hypertrophic heart disease, it does not prove that this is the sole or necessarily primary mechanism underlying the decline in ROS stimulation or amelioration of hypertrophic remodeling and cardiac function. However, the finding that BH4 administered from the onset of TAC did not suppress hypertrophy during the first week (when control heart NOS activity was still preserved) yet prevented progression after that (when NOS uncoupling and reduced activity otherwise occurred) further supports such a link. A second limitation regards the comparison between BH4 and Tempol. Because we did not use a full dose-ranging study, the possibility remains that different pharmacology for the 2 compounds and/or alternative signaling not revealed by the data obtained could explain some of the disparate effects.
The present findings suggest that NOS-derived ROS plays a particularly important role in decompensated hypertrophic heart disease. The existing clinical viability of BH4 as a drug, albeit for a different disorder at present,15 should help facilitate clinical translation and testing of the present findings to human heart disease. An intriguing potential patient population is individuals with heart failure and a preserved EF, often called diastolic heart failure. This disorder affects nearly half of all patients with heart failure worldwide, most often elderly women with hypertension and ventricular hypertrophy,39 and its prevalence is rising.40 If the present findings can be translated to humans, BH4 might provide a novel and potent therapy to treat this common heart disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
The work was supported by the Belgian-American Education Foundation (Collen), the PhD program at the University of Antwerp, and an American Heart Association Fellowship Grant (Dr Moens); AHA Scientist Development Grants (Drs Champion and Takimoto); HL081205 (Dr Biswal); NIEHS center grant P30 ES 03819, HL31069, HL43023, and HL66331 (Dr Wolin); and AG-18324, HL-47511, and HL-59408, The Peter Belfer Laboratory Fund, and an Abraham and Virginia Weiss Professorship (Dr Kass).
Disclosures
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Related Article:
Circulation 2008 117: 2567-2569.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |