(Circulation. 2008;117:1964-1972.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Interventional Cardiology |
From the UCL Institute of Child Health (P.L., L.C., S.K., J.N., S.S., V.M., G.D., S.C., V.T., J.D., A.M.T., P.B.), London, United Kingdom; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust (P.L., L.C., S.K., J.N., S.S., V.M., T.Y.L., G.P., G.D., V.T., J.D., A.M.T., P.B.), Cardiothoracic Unit, London, United Kingdom; Service de Cardiologie Pédiatrique (Y.B.), Hôspital Necker Enfants Malades, Paris, France; and The Heart Hospital NHS Trust (S.C., F.W., V.T., J.D., P.B.), London, United Kingdom.
Correspondence to Philipp Bonhoeffer, Cardiac Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond St, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. E-mail BonhoP{at}gosh.nhs.uk
Received August 23, 2007; accepted February 15, 2008.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results— Between September 2000 and February 2007, 155 patients with stenosis and/or regurgitation underwent percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. This led to significant reduction in right ventricular systolic pressure (from 63±18 to 45±13 mm Hg, P<0.001) and right ventricular outflow tract gradient (from 37±20 to 17±10 mm Hg, P<0.001). Follow-up ranged from 0 to 83.7 months (median 28.4 months). Freedom from reoperation was 93% (±2%), 86% (±3%), 84% (±4%), and 70% (±13%) at 10, 30, 50, and 70 months, respectively. Freedom from transcatheter reintervention was 95% (±2%), 87% (±3%), 73% (±6%), and 73% (±6%) at 10, 30, 50, and 70 months, respectively. Survival at 83 months was 96.9%. On time-dependent analysis, the first series of 50 patients (log-rank test P<0.001) and patients with a residual gradient >25 mm Hg (log-rank test P=0.01) were associated with a higher risk of reoperations.
Conclusions— Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation resulted in the ability to avoid surgical right ventricular outflow tract revision in the majority of cases. This procedure might reduce the number of operations needed over the total lifetime of patients with right ventricle–to–pulmonary artery conduits.
Key Words: pulmonary valve heart defects, congenital catheterization stenosis regurgitation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Perspective p 1972
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
PPVI was performed by a single operator at Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades (Paris, France), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, The Heart Hospital, and The Harley Street Clinic (London, United Kingdom). Written informed consent was obtained from patients and parents as appropriate. The ethics committees at these institutions approved the study protocol. The study was approved by CCPPRB (Comité Consultatif de Protection des Personnes dans la Recherche Biomédicale; Paris, France) and MHRA (Medical Health Regulatory Authority; London, United Kingdom) and performed under humanitarian exemption in a case-by-case controlled fashion.
Protocol
Patients were assigned to New York Heart Association functional classes I through IV. Objective exercise capacity was measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing unless contraindicated. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in all patients. The RV systolic pressure was estimated from the tricuspid regurgitant jet and the RVOT gradient calculated from the velocity across the RVOT.17 PR was defined qualitatively by color flow Doppler,18 whereas RV dysfunction and dilatation were assessed by 2-dimensional echocardiography.
Morphological suitability for PPVI was either assessed by magnetic resonance imaging or, in those who had contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging, by biplane angiography.15,19 With increasing experience, balloon sizing of the RVOT was added to the assessment protocol in patients with borderline anatomy. The utility of this technique has been demonstrated in the setting of other transcatheter interventions such as atrial septal defect closure20 and PA stenting.21 After coronary obstruction due to PPVI in 1 patient, angiography in the ascending aorta was performed in all patients. Simultaneous balloon inflation in the RVOT and coronary angiography were performed in patients at risk for coronary obstruction.8,22,23
Valve implantation was performed under general anesthesia. Pressure measurements and angiography were performed before and after PPVI. The technique has been reported previously.15 Echocardiographic follow-up was performed at 1, 6, 12, 36, and 70 months, respectively. Echocardiograms were performed (P.L., L.C., S.K., and J.N.); follow-up echocardiograms performed at patients local institutions were reviewed by the investigators.
Predictors for Reoperation and Transcatheter Reintervention
We assessed the impact of learning curve by dividing the patient population into a cohort that consisted of the first 50 patients who underwent PPVI and a second cohort representing the following 105 patients. After the 50th patient, the device design was frozen, and the authors believed that the learning curve had been completed in terms of technical experience and patient selection. To predict outcome related to hemodynamic results, we assessed the impact of a residual gradient on rate of reoperation and transcatheter reintervention. This was defined by a pullback gradient across the valved stent of >25 mm Hg, measured immediately after device deployment.
Statistical Analysis
Baseline variables were calculated as mean±SD or n (%). Survival curves were obtained by Kaplan–Meier plots. Reoperation and transcatheter reintervention-free survival was calculated from date of valve implantation to latest follow-up or date of surgery/catheterization and was expressed as percentage ±SEM. Patients who underwent second PPVI were not excluded from analysis of freedom from reoperation. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to assess the impact of the learning curve and the initial hemodynamics on reoperation-free and transcatheter reintervention-free survival. Log-rank testing was performed to compare groups. A paired t test was used to evaluate differences in invasively measured pressures before and after PPVI. Echocardiographic data were evaluated for changes from 1 month postprocedure to 6, 12 and 36 months using a linear model with an unstructured covariance structure and time as a repeated variable. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed on SPSS 11.0 for Mac (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill, USA).
The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The median age of the present patient population was 21.2 years (range 7 to 71 years); 57 patients were <16 years old (37%), and 42% were female (Table 2). Most patients (61%) had tetralogy of Fallot or a variant morphology; 92% had an RV-to-PA conduit placed at previous surgery, 81% of which were homografts. Before the procedure, an RV-to–systemic pressure ratio of >2/3 was present in 58% of patients; echocardiography showed moderate or severe PR in 64%. The vast majority of patients complained of symptoms (138 of 155 patients), and 61% had impaired exercise capacity (defined as a peak oxygen consumption <65% of predicted). In total, 17 asymptomatic patients underwent PPVI. Indications for intervention in the absence of symptoms were RV-to–systemic pressure ratio >3/4 (0.89±0.13) in 9, peak oxygen consumption <65% of predicted (54.7±1.0%) in 4, and severe RV dilatation in 4 (z score for RV end-diastolic diameter assessed on echocardiography 5.9±2.3).
|
All but 8 patients in the present series were suitable for surgical RV-to-PA conduit replacement. In these 8, contraindications for surgery were pulmonary hypertension (n=4), severe chest deformity (n=2), and cardiogenic shock when referred for PPVI (n=2).
Procedural Results
Procedures were performed via a femoral venous approach in all but 7 cases. In these 7 patients, transjugular access was necessary owing to femoral venous occlusion or azygous vein continuity. After successful valve implantation, RV systolic pressure (63±18 to 45±13 mm Hg, P<0.001) and RVOT gradient (37±20 to 17±10 mm Hg, P<0.001) fell significantly (Table 3). In addition, postprocedural angiography showed relief of PR, which was reflected in an increase in diastolic PA pressure (from 10±4 to 14±9 mm Hg, P<0.001). No patient had more than mild PR on angiography after valve implantation.
|
Seven major procedural complications were seen: device instability, including dislodgement of the device (n=2); homograft rupture (n=3); compression of the left main coronary artery after device deployment (n=1); and obstruction of the origin of the right PA (n=1).1 Other complications included guidewire injury of a distal PA with minor bronchial bleeding (n=2); partial homograft rupture that led to confined extravasation of contrast medium (n=1); and damage to the tricuspid valve caused by the balloon of the delivery system, which led to moderate tricuspid regurgitation (n=2). Five patients who had major complications required surgical RVOT revision; none of these procedures led to mortality. However, prolonged resuscitation after homograft rupture in 1 patient led to neurological sequelae followed by good recovery. One patient required surgery for hemostasis after homograft rupture, but the valved stent was conserved.
Follow-Up
Follow-up ranged from 0 to 83.7 months (median 28.4 months). Follow-up was 100% complete for death, reoperation, and transcatheter reintervention. Freedom from reoperation was 93±2%, 86±3%, 84±4%, and 70±13% at 10, 30, 50, and 70 months, respectively. Patients who underwent reoperation are summarized in Table 4.
|
Reinterventions in the form of balloon dilation of the device (n=3) and second valve implantation with a "stent-in-stent" technique (n=19) were performed in 22 patients. Freedom from transcatheter reintervention was 95±2%, 87±3%, 73±6%, and 73±6% at 10, 30, 50, and 70 months, respectively. Indication for reintervention was predominantly obstruction related to the "hammock" effect in 7 patients and stent fractures in 9 cases. The incidence of stent fractures in the total population in the present study was 21%. The nature of and reasons for the hammock effect and stent fractures have been described previously.15,24 Other reasons for second valve implantation were restenosis of unknown origin (n=4) and a residual RVOT gradient after the first procedure (n=2). Second PPVI led to a significant decrease in RVOT gradient (from 47.6±18.2 to 19.5±10.0 mm Hg, P<0.001) with no procedural complications.
Echocardiographic follow-up was 90.1% complete. On echocardiography, valvar competence was well maintained during follow-up; moderate PR was only seen in 2 patients in the context of endocarditis (Figure 3). PPVI was performed in 4 patients with pulmonary hypertension. Despite high diastolic PA pressures, all patients had mild or less PR at a median follow-up of 18.5 months.
|
In the cohort of patients who did not undergo reoperation or transcatheter reintervention, the peak velocity across the device increased slightly from 1 month to 36 months after the procedure (P=0.07). At 1, 6, 12, 36, and 70 months, peak RVOT velocity was 2.64±0.6 m/s (n=107), 2.7±0.59 m/s (n=86), 2.66±0.5 m/s (n=83), 2.89±0.74 m/s (n=25), and 3.7±1.31 m/s (n=3), respectively (Table 5). At a follow-up of 70 months, 2 patients who underwent PPVI at the age of 11.5±0.9 years were awaiting surgical RVOT revision owing to outgrown conduits.
|
Complications During Follow-Up
Endocarditis was diagnosed in 5 patients at a median of 4.93 (range 1.9 to 23.2) months after PPVI. In these patients, endocarditis occurred in the context of unprotected dental treatment (n=1), reactivation of previously treated fungal infection (n=1), and a septic wound after arm trauma (n=1). Two patients had histories of endocarditis treated medically before PPVI. Organisms were Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus aurelius, and Candida albicans. Endocarditis led to valve explantation in 3 patients; 2 patients were successfully treated medically, which led to moderate PR on echocardiography 1 year after diagnosis.
After technically successful valve implantation into a 15-mm homograft, 1 patient developed hemolysis within hours after the procedure. This was attributed to a significant residual gradient (60 mm Hg) in a rather small homograft in addition to external compression of the RVOT, which necessitated device explantation.
One patient who underwent PPVI for RV-to-PA conduit stenosis after Rastelli repair experienced an out-of-hospital arrest 3.5 years after the procedure. Ventricular tachycardia was documented at resuscitation, and she was resuscitated successfully without neurological sequelae. At latest follow-up, 2.3 months before the event, echocardiography had revealed a competent valve with a peak velocity across the valved stent of 3.0 m/s. On ventricular stimulation during electrophysiological studies, no arrhythmia could be induced, and an implantable defibrillator was inserted. Although benign in the majority of cases,24 stent fractures led to stent embolization into the right PA in 1 patient, who required surgical explantation of the percutaneous pulmonary valve.
Mortality
Four of 155 patients who underwent PPVI died. Survival at 83 months was 96.6%. Two of the patients who died had presented in cardiogenic shock and multiorgan failure, and PPVI was performed as a palliative strategy. The first patient had a history of 5 previous operations, deteriorated 6 weeks after a technically successful PPVI, and died of a chest infection. The second presented in multiorgan failure and severe fluid overload with critical recoarctation and RVOT obstruction. Despite successful PPVI and dilation of severe recoarctation, the patient died of pulmonary edema 24 hours after the procedure.
Two patients died suddenly at 8 and 35 months after PPVI. In both cases, autopsy revealed the valved stent appropriately seated in the RVOT. At latest follow-up, echocardiography showed good valvar competence of the device with a peak velocity across it of <3 m/s. The deaths were presumed to be due to arrhythmia.
Impact of the Learning Curve on Outcome
Freedom from reoperation in the first series of 50 patients was significantly shorter than in the subsequent patient population (log-rank test P<0.001; Figure 4A). In addition, residual gradients measured invasively after PPVI were associated with higher rates of reoperation (log-rank test P=0.01; Figure 4B) and transcatheter reintervention (log-rank test P=0.008).
|
Of the first 50 patients, 16 patients underwent device explantation compared with 5 patients in the second cohort. The incidence of a residual gradient of >25 mm Hg was higher in the first cohort of patients (n=16 of 50 versus 5 of 105 patients in the second cohort). Freedom from transcatheter reintervention did not differ significantly in the 2 cohorts on time-dependent analysis (n=13 versus n=9; log-rank test P=0.18). This is due to the fact that reinterventions were performed predominantly due to stent fractures, a complication that was not affected by the learning curve. The incidence of procedural complications fell from 6% in the first cohort to 2.9% in the second cohort of patients (n=3 of 50 versus 3 of 105 patients).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PPVI was performed with the aim to prolong the lifespan of the valved conduit, thus delaying surgery. Needless to say, the longevity of immediate and early results is crucial to the success of this technique. During follow-up over months, the hemodynamic improvement was sustained in the majority of patients.
Although reoperation and transcatheter reintervention were required in some patients during follow-up due to recurrence of stenosis, none required reinterventions for valvular incompetence in the absence of endocarditis. Initially, early restenosis was caused by the hammock effect,15 which was resolved by altering the device design. Occurrence of stent fracture during follow-up led to an increase in RVOT gradient and RV pressures.24 This was treatable with a second device, which proved to be a safe and successful approach.
Procedures were performed over a time frame of >6 years. In this period, the device design has been altered, the delivery system has improved, and the operators confidence has grown. Therefore, we clearly identified a learning curve in our results. Freedom from reoperation was significantly longer in the second cohort of patients (51st through 155th) who underwent PPVI. Several factors contributed to this improvement. First, the incidence of residual gradients was reduced. A postprocedural gradient >25 mm Hg was associated with shorter freedom from reoperation. Incorrect patient selection, including patients with small conduits, and the reluctance to postdilate implanted valves led more frequently to postprocedural pressure gradients >25 mm Hg in the first cohort. In the second cohort, patients with residual gradients after PPVI were postdilated with high-pressure balloons with no demonstrable negative impact on valvar function. Second, patient selection improved with better understanding of the implantation site. Thus, device dislodgement at the time of PPVI was seen only in the first group. Careful assessment of conduit type, RVOT morphology,19,26 and distensibility24 has resulted in appropriate case selection for PPVI. This led us to understand that PPVI should generally not be attempted in patients with patch reconstruction of the RVOT and very distensible homografts, in the absence of an RV-to-PA gradient (seen in both patients in whom device dislodgement occurred). Third, strategies to deal with device failures changed: patients underwent a second PPVI in the latter experience rather than a reoperation. Finally, most procedural complications occurred within the series of the first 50 patients and, in our opinion, represent the learning curve. Despite clear progress, we have not found any strategies to predict or avoid homograft rupture. Further investigation is necessary to identify patients at risk of this complication.
The success of PPVI has significant implications for the timing of interventions for RVOT dysfunction. In clinical practice, timing of operation is often biased by the patients and physicians reluctance to commit to multiple open heart surgeries, thereby exposing the RV to an increasing duration of abnormal loading conditions. Although reduction of RV diastolic and systolic volumes can be achieved even when patients are treated late,27 studies have shown a lack of improvement in RV ejection fraction and exercise performance after surgical valve implantation.28–31 The availability of PPVI might lead to better patient acceptance and therefore promote earlier intervention before irreversible ventricular dysfunction occurs. Although the optimal timing for intervention remains controversial, PPVI can allow for postponement of surgery after restoration of an acceptable RV loading condition.
Study Limitations
Because this is a midterm analysis of results after PPVI, long-term valvar performance is still unknown. It is likely that valvar degeneration, as seen in surgically implanted biological valves, will occur in this device. In the present series, however, we have not seen valvar degeneration leading to stenosis or regurgitation in the absence of endocarditis. Although PPVI led to a significant reduction in RV pressure and RVOT gradient, a small residual gradient was still present in the majority of cases after the procedure. The long-term effects of low outflow tract gradients are unknown. Again, longer follow-up is necessary to address this question. Results of PPVI were not compared with surgical pulmonary valve implantation. However, transcatheter implantation of a valve in the pulmonary position was performed to prolong a surgical result after conduit placement rather than as a surrogate for open heart surgery. Therefore, we chose to assess the potential of PPVI to delay surgery by applying the same criteria for reintervention as for initial treatment, which were based on surgical indications.
Conclusions
PPVI improves RV outflow hemodynamics and delays surgery by prolonging conduit lifespan. Our experience represents the impact of evolving technologies in medicine, with progressive improvement in clinical results by device and technique modification. PPVI should reduce the number of operations and the cumulative hemodynamic burden on the RV over the total lifetime of children and young adults, potentially improving the life expectancy of patients with congenital heart disease that involves the RVOT.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
P. Lurz is funded by the European Union (Health-e-Child Initiative); Drs Coats, Deanfield, and Bonhoeffer and S. Schievano are funded by the British Heart Foundation. Dr Taylor is funded by the Higher Education Funding Council for England.
Disclosures
Dr Bonhoeffer is a consultant to Medtronic and NuMed and has received honoraria and royalties for the device described. Drs Taylor and Khambadkone are consultants to Medtronic and have received honoraria. The remaining authors report no conflicts.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bielefeld MR, Bishop DA, Campbell DN, Mitchell MB, Grover FL, Clarke DR. Reoperative homograft right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 71: 482–487.
3. Askovich B, Hawkins JA, Sower CT, Minich LL, Tani LY, Stoddard G, Puchalski MD. Right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduit longevity: is it related to allograft size? Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 84: 907–911.
4. Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Rodefeld MD, Vijay P, Turrentine MW. Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with an allograft conduit in non-Ross patients: risk factors for allograft dysfunction and failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 80: 655–663.
5. Stark J, Bull C, Stajevic M, Jothi M, Elliott M, de Leval M. Fate of subpulmonary homograft conduits: determinants of late homograft failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 115: 506–514.
6. Tweddell JS, Pelech AN, Frommelt PC, Mussatto KA, Wyman JD, Fedderly RT, Berger S, Frommelt MA, Lewis DA, Friedberg DZ, Thomas JP Jr, Sachdeva R, Litwin SB. Factors affecting longevity of homograft valves used in right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction for congenital heart disease. Circulation. 2000; 102 (suppl III): III-130–III-135.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Oosterhof T, Meijboom FJ, Vliegen HW, Hazekamp MG, Zwinderman AH, Bouma BJ, van Dijk AP, Mulder BJ. Long-term follow-up of homograft function after pulmonary valve replacement in patients with tetralogy of Fallot. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 1478–1484.
8. Peng LF, McElhinney DB, Nugent AW, Powell AJ, Marshall AC, Bacha EA, Lock JE. Endovascular stenting of obstructed right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduits: a 15-year experience. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2598–2605.
9. Powell AJ, Lock JE, Keane JF, Perry SB. Prolongation of RV-PA conduit life span by percutaneous stent implantation: intermediate-term results. Circulation. 1995; 92: 3282–3288.
10. Fogelman R, Nykanen D, Smallhorn JF, McCrindle BW, Freedom RM, Benson LN. Endovascular stents in the pulmonary circulation: clinical impact on management and medium-term follow-up. Circulation. 1995; 92: 881–885.
11. Bove EL, Byrum CJ, Thomas FD, Kavey RE, Sondheimer HM, Blackman MS, Parker FB Jr. The influence of pulmonary insufficiency on ventricular function following repair of tetralogy of Fallot: evaluation using radionuclide ventriculography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983; 85: 691–696.[Abstract]
12. Carvalho JS, Shinebourne EA, Busst C, Rigby ML, Redington AN. Exercise capacity after complete repair of tetralogy of Fallot: deleterious effects of residual pulmonary regurgitation. Br Heart J. 1992; 67: 470–473.
13. Gatzoulis MA, Balaji S, Webber SA, Siu SC, Hokanson JS, Poile C, Rosenthal M, Nakazawa M, Moller JH, Gillette PC, Webb GD, Redington AN. Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicentre study. Lancet. 2000; 356: 975–981.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Bonhoeffer P, Boudjemline Y, Saliba Z, Merckx J, Aggoun Y, Bonnet D, Acar P, Le Bidois J, Sidi D, Kachaner J. Percutaneous replacement of pulmonary valve in a right-ventricle to pulmonary-artery prosthetic conduit with valve dysfunction. Lancet. 2000; 356: 1403–1405.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Khambadkone S, Coats L, Taylor A, Boudjemline Y, Derrick G, Tsang V, Cooper J, Muthurangu V, Hegde SR, Razavi RS, Pellerin D, Deanfield J, Bonhoeffer P. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation in humans: results in 59 consecutive patients. Circulation. 2005; 112: 1189–1197.
16. Therrien J, Warnes C, Daliento L, Hess J, Hoffmann A, Marelli A, Thilen U, Presbitero P, Perloff J, Somerville J, Webb GD. Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference 2001 update: recommendations for the management of adults with congenital heart disease part III. Can J Cardiol. 2001; 17: 1135–1158.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Yock PG, Popp RL. Noninvasive estimation of right ventricular systolic pressure by Doppler ultrasound in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation. 1984; 70: 657–662.
18. Joyce JJ, Hwang EY, Wiles HB, Kline CH, Bradley SM, Crawford FA Jr. Reliability of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography during tetralogy of Fallot repair. Echocardiography. 2000; 17: 319–327.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Schievano S, Migliavacca F, Coats L, Khambadkone S, Carminati M, Wilson N, Deanfield JE, Bonhoeffer P, Taylor AM. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation based on rapid prototyping of right ventricular outflow tract and pulmonary trunk from MR data. Radiology. 2007; 242: 490–497.
20. Rome JJ, Keane JF, Perry SB, Spevak PJ, Lock JE. Double-umbrella closure of atrial defects: initial clinical applications. Circulation. 1990; 82: 751–758.
21. Nagm AM, Moore JW. Balloon sizing of pulmonary branch stenosis: a useful method to guide stent implantation. J Invasive Cardiol. 2003; 15: 437–438.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Sridharan S, Coats L, Khambadkone S, Taylor AM, Bonhoeffer P. Images in cardiovascular medicine: transcatheter right ventricular outflow tract intervention: the risk to the coronary circulation. Circulation. 2006; 113: e934–e935.
23. Maheshwari S, Bruckheimer E, Nehgme RA, Fahey JT, Kholwadwala D, Hellenbrand WE. Single coronary artery complicating stent implantation for homograft stenosis in tetralogy of Fallot. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997; 42: 405–407.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Nordmeyer J, Khambadkone S, Coats L, Schievano S, Lurz P, Parenzan G, Taylor A, Lock J, Bonhoeffer P. Risk stratification, systematic classification and anticipatory strategies for stent fractures after percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Circulation. 2007; 115: 1392–1397.
25. Garty Y, Veldtman G, Lee K, Benson L. Late outcomes after pulmonary valve balloon dilatation in neonates, infants and children. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005; 17: 318–322.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Schievano S, Coats L, Migliavacca F, Norman W, Frigiola A, Deanfield J, Bonhoeffer P, Taylor AM. Variations in right ventricular outflow tract morphology following repair of congenital heart disease: implications for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007; 9: 687–695.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Oosterhof T, van Straten A, Vliegen HW, Meijboom FJ, van Dijk AP, Spijkerboer AM, Bouma BJ, Zwinderman AH, Hazekamp MG, de Roos A, Mulder BJ. Preoperative thresholds for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2007; 116: 545–551.
28. Therrien J, Siu SC, McLaughlin PR, Liu PP, Williams WG, Webb GD. Pulmonary valve replacement in adults late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: are we operating too late? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 1670–1675.
29. Ghez O, Tsang VT, Frigiola A, Coats L, Taylor A, Van Doorn C, Bonhoeffer P, De Leval M. Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction for pulmonary regurgitation after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: preliminary results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007; 31: 654–658.
30. Dave HH, Buechel ER, Dodge-Khatami A, Kadner A, Rousson V, Bauersfeld U, Pretre R. Early insertion of a pulmonary valve for chronic regurgitation helps restoration of ventricular dimensions. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 80: 1615–1620.
31. Gengsakul A, Harris L, Bradley TJ, Webb GD, Williams WG, Siu SC, Merchant N, McCrindle BW. The impact of pulmonary valve replacement after tetralogy of Fallot repair: a matched comparison. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007; 32: 462–468.
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
After the first transcatheter valve implantation in 2000, a new field in interventional cardiology developed. New techniques evolved rapidly, with significant improvement in outcomes. We assessed our results after percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation over a time frame of 6 years from the first to the 155th patient. The aim of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation was to prolong the lifespan of conduits, which were surgically placed from the right ventricle to the pulmonary artery. Because of the limited longevity of conduits, the majority of patients with right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction traditionally undergo multiple open heart operations for conduit replacement. We show that percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation successfully restores conduit function with a low procedural complication rate. Explantation-free survival 5 years after percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation is >70%. This prolonged conduit lifespan should reduce the number of multiple open heart operations over the total lifespan of children and young adults with congenital heart disease and potentially improve life expectancy of these patients. As with all new procedures, whether surgical or interventional, the impact of the learning curve on a novel technique must be recognized. Therefore, we divided our patient population into a cohort consisting of the first 50 patients and a second cohort representing the later experience of 105 patients. In our experience, explantation-free survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation in the second cohort. The impact of a learning curve on clinical results of new interventional procedures is of importance, especially if interventions and devices are compared with conventional therapies.
Circulation 2008 117: 1909.
![]() |
T. D. Karamitsos, J. M. Francis, S. Myerson, J. B. Selvanayagam, and S. Neubauer The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Heart Failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2009; 54(15): 1407 - 1424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lurz, R. Puranik, J. Nordmeyer, V. Muthurangu, M. S. Hansen, S. Schievano, J. Marek, P. Bonhoeffer, and A. M. Taylor Improvement in left ventricular filling properties after relief of right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit obstruction: contribution of septal motion and interventricular mechanical delay Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2009; 30(18): 2266 - 2274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ferrari, C. Sulzer, E. Rizzo, and L. K. von Segesser Transcatheter stent-valve implantation in a stenotic pulmonary conduit via a sub-xyphoidian access Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 36(3): 595 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Dos, A. Dadashev, D. Tanous, I. J. Ferreira-Gonzalez, K. Haberer, S. C. Siu, G. S. Van Arsdell, E. N. Oechslin, W. G. Williams, and C. K. Silversides Pulmonary valve replacement in repaired tetralogy of Fallot: Determinants of early postoperative adverse outcomes J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2009; 138(3): 553 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nordmeyer, V. Tsang, R. Gaudin, P. Lurz, A. Frigiola, A. Jones, S. Schievano, C. van Doorn, P. Bonhoeffer, and A. M. Taylor Quantitative assessment of homograft function 1 year after insertion into the pulmonary position: impact of in situ homograft geometry on valve competence Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2009; 30(17): 2147 - 2154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nordmeyer, P. Lurz, V. T. Tsang, L. Coats, F. Walker, A. M. Taylor, S. Khambadkone, M. R. de Leval, and P. Bonhoeffer Effective transcatheter valve implantation after pulmonary homograft failure: A new perspective on the Ross operation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2009; 138(1): 84 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lurz, J. Nordmeyer, V. Muthurangu, S. Khambadkone, G. Derrick, R. Yates, M. Sury, P. Bonhoeffer, and A. M. Taylor Comparison of Bare Metal Stenting and Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation for Treatment of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction: Use of an X-Ray/Magnetic Resonance Hybrid Laboratory for Acute Physiological Assessment Circulation, June 16, 2009; 119(23): 2995 - 3001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill The year in interventional cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2009; 53(22): 2080 - 2097. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-J. Zong, Y. Bai, H.-B. Jiang, W.-P. Li, H. Wu, X.-X. Zhao, and Y.-W. Qin Use of a novel valve stent for transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement: An animal study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2009; 137(6): 1363 - 1369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Bruce and H. M. Connolly Right-Sided Valve Disease Deserves a Little More Respect Circulation, May 26, 2009; 119(20): 2726 - 2734. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Piazza, A. Asgar, R. Ibrahim, and R. Bonan Transcatheter Mitral and Pulmonary Valve Therapy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2009; 53(20): 1837 - 1851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Lurz, J Nordmeyer, L Coats, A M Taylor, P Bonhoeffer, and I Schulze-Neick Immediate clinical and haemodynamic benefits of restoration of pulmonary valvar competence in patients with pulmonary hypertension Heart, April 1, 2009; 95(8): 646 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Deanfield, R. Yates, F. J. Meijboom, and B. J.M. Mulder CHAPTER 10 Congenital Heart Disease in Children and Adults ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mack Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me! A perspective on the emerging world of percutaneous heart valve therapy. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2008; 136(4): 816 - 819. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |