| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2007;116:e110-e113.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinician Update |
From the Division of Cardiology (A.C., L.T., K.A., K.C.D.), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Mo; and Cardiology Section (A.C., L.T., K.A.), Harry S Truman VA Medical Center, Columbia, Mo.
Correspondence to Anand Chockalingam, MD, Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, DC 043.00, University of Missouri, One Hospital Dr, Columbia, MO 65212. E-mail chockalingama{at}health.missouri.edu
Key Words: ventricular outflow obstruction myocardial infarction mitral valve heart failure
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The patient became hypotensive after catheterization, with systolic pressures between 70 and 85 mm Hg. Dopamine infusion did not improve blood pressure, and the murmur increased to grade 3/6 intensity. Atrial fibrillation developed with a ventricular rate of 150 bpm. Dopamine was discontinued, and intravenous amiodarone converted the atrial fibrillation to sinus tachycardia at 115 bpm, but the hypotension and murmur persisted. Under close supervision, intravenous metoprolol was initiated. With reduction of heart rate to below 70 bpm, the murmur disappeared, and her blood pressure improved. Several hours later, a repeat echocardiogram showed no SAM or LVOT obstruction (LVOTO) and only mild MR.
Numerous reports have highlighted the occurrence of dynamic LVOTO as a complication of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).1,2 LVOTO has also been detected in
20% of transient LV apical ballooning syndrome, also called Takatsubo cardiomyopathy.3 The actual incidence of dynamic LVOTO is unclear, but it may be significantly underdiagnosed and can indeed mimic cardiogenic shock in an acute-care setting.4
| Mechanism of LVOTO |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Assessment of LVOTO
Clinical examination consistent with subaortic stenosis should be sought in all subjects who present with hemodynamic instability and possible STEMI. Bisferiens pulse may not be evident if the patient is hypotensive, and the apex may be silent. MR features may predominate, but a sustained apical heave and a separate ejection murmur, best heard in the left third intercostal space, should create suspicion of LVOTO.
Inotropes are known to induce transient SAM and LVOTO in approximately 17% to 21% of otherwise healthy people.5,6 Transient LV apical ballooning may account for 1% to 2% of all STEMI cases and up to 12% of anterior STEMI in women.7,8 Systolic murmur, SAM, and even gradients across the LVOT could be related to true STEMI or transient LV apical ballooning or could be an inotrope-related benign finding.
Shock in the STEMI setting, therefore, cannot be automatically attributed to LVOTO in all instances in which echocardiography detects SAM. M-mode studies may help estimate the duration and severity of SAM. Color aliasing–guided pulse Doppler interrogation, from the apical 5-chamber view, may help select the LVOT jet from MR contamination. Because these findings can be transient, timing of the echocardiogram is critical. Hypotension should correlate to the severity of LVOTO gradients to attribute instability to SAM. Ideally, an experienced echocardiographer should note the prevailing hemodynamics and murmur at the time of imaging. Basal hypercontractility, regional dysfunction correlating with coronary territory, and apical ballooning should be assessed. MR direction and severity and structural abnormalities of the mitral apparatus also need to be quantified. Echocardiography provides an ideal tool for noninvasive, urgent, and definitive diagnosis of most components at the bedside. Early catheterization remains the method of choice to address the possibility of STEMI. The final proof for the role of SAM in this setting will be in the relief of hypotension by the reduction of LVOTO.
STEMI With Shock, or Is It LVOTO?
Along with acute MR, ventricular septal defect, and free-wall rupture, we propose that dynamic LVOTO be included in the differential diagnosis of STEMI and cardiogenic shock. If a murmur is noted to be suggestive of LVOTO, an echocardiogram should be performed at the earliest possible time. However, catheterization may be the initial study used to avoid delays in early diagnosis and relief of coronary occlusions. If catheterization reveals no significant coronary lesions, assessment of left ventriculography and catheter pullback gradients may help. Subsequent hypotension could nevertheless be caused by increasing gradients across the LVOT. Regardless of coronary anatomy and intervention, repeat echocardiography to exclude LVOTO should be considered if an ejection murmur is detected with hemodynamic compromise (Figure 3).
|
Management of LVOTO
Management depends on early identification of the various issues (Table) and must be individualized on the basis of these factors, prevailing hemodynamics, and coexisting circumstances. Intravenous fluids would benefit by increased intravascular volume and LV volumes, thereby reducing the mitral SAM. Coronary revascularization would improve contractility of apical segments and reduce the basal hypercontractility. If LVOTO is not suspected, inotropes could be easily escalated and further decompensation attributed to STEMI-related LV dysfunction. Even in the absence of significant coronary lesions, this could elevate wall stress in the subendocardium enough to cause leakage of cardiac biomarkers that suggest MI. An intra-aortic balloon pump could induce or worsen LVOTO by reducing afterload.9 Phenylephrine may selectively improve vascular tone and reduce LVOTO.10
|
Use of ß-blockers would benefit LVOTO gradients by reducing basal hypercontractility, increasing LV filling and size, and reducing heart rate. Nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers may be used if ß-blockers are contraindicated. Targeting heart rate below 60 to 70 bpm should ensure adequate cardiac inhibition and reduction of LVOTO. MR often improves with reduction of SAM and LVOTO.
| Conclusions and Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Hrovatin E, Piazza R, Pavan D, Mimo R, Macor F, DallAglio V, Burelli C, Cassin M, Canterin FA, Brieda M, Vitrella G, Gilberto C, Nicolosi GL. Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in the setting of acute anterior myocardial infarction: a serious and potentially fatal complication? Echocardiography. 2002; 19: 449–455.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Tsuchihashi K, Ueshima K, Uchida T, Oh-mura N, Kimura K, Owa M, Yoshiyama M, Miyazaki S, Haze K, Ogawa H, Honda T, Hase M, Kai R, Morii I; Angina Pectoris-Myocardial Infarction Investigations in Japan. Transient left ventricular apical ballooning without coronary artery stenosis: a novel heart syndrome mimicking acute myocardial infarction: Angina Pectoris-Myocardial Infarction Investigations in Japan. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 11–18.
4. Di Chiara A, Werren M, Badano LP, Fioretti PM. Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction: an unusual mechanism mimicking anterior myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Ital Heart J. 2001; 2: 60–67.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Pellikka PA, Oh JK, Bailey KR, Nichols BA, Monahan KH, Tajik AJ. Dynamic intraventricular obstruction during dobutamine stress echocardiography: a new observation. Circulation. 1992; 86: 1429–1432.
6. Luria D, Klutstein MW, Rosenmann D, Shaheen J, Sergey S, Tzivoni D. Prevalence and significance of left ventricular outflow gradient during dobutamine echocardiography. Eur Heart J. 1999; 20: 386–392.
7. Pilliere R, Mansencal N, Digne F, Lacombe P, Joseph T, Dubourg O. Prevalence of tako-tsubo syndrome in a large urban agglomeration. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 98: 662–665.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Parodi G, Del Pace S, Carrabba N, Salvadori C, Memisha G, Simonetti I, Antoniucci D, Gensini GF. Incidence, clinical findings, and outcome of women with left ventricular apical ballooning syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99: 182–185.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Brown ML, Abel MD, Click RL, Morford RG, Dearani JA, Sundt TM, Orszulak TA, Schaff HV. Systolic anterior motion after mitral valve repair: is surgical intervention necessary? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007; 133: 136–143.
10. Cohen R, Rivagorda J, Elhadad S. Asymmetric septal hypertrophy complicated by dynamic left ventricular obstruction after intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation placement in the setting of anterior myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006; 18: E207–E208.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Related Article:
Circulation 2007 116: 457.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |