Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;116:e576
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.737718
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arentz, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kalusche, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Arentz, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kalusche, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs

(Circulation. 2007;116:e576.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Correspondence

Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Small or Large Isolation Areas Around the Pulmonary Veins for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation? Results From a Prospective Randomized Study"

Thomas Arentz, MD; Reinhold Weber, MD; Gerd Bürkle, MD; Claudia Herrera, MD; Thomas Blum, MD; Jochem Stockinger, MD; Jan Minners, MD, PhD; Franz Josef Neumann, MD; Dietrich Kalusche, MD

Abteilung Rhythmologie, Herz-Zentrum, Bad Krozingen, Germany

In their letter regarding our article,1 Drs Kriatselis and Roser suggest that large isolation during circumferential ablation can only be proved using 2 circumferential mapping catheters, 1 in each ipsilateral pulmonary vein.

We agree that the double-Lasso technique2 allows us to know whether the disappearance of electrical potentials in both veins has been simultaneous. From a practical point of view, however, sequential mapping of both ipsilateral pulmonary veins will lead to the same ablation result, with elimination of all potentials in a large area. In addition, the use of 1 circumferential mapping catheter with variable diameter, as described in our study,1 permits mapping closer to the ablation line, probably improving the localization of conduction gaps.

It might be interesting, though, to compare the recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in patients who had simultaneous disappearance of potentials in both ipsilateral veins and in patients who did not.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 

  1. Arentz T, Weber R, Bürkle G, Herrera C, Blum T, Stockinger J, Minners J, Neumann FJ, Kalusche D. Small or large isolation areas around the pulmonary veins for the treatment of atrial fibrillation? Results from a prospective randomized study. Circulation. 2007; 115: 3057–3063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ouyang F, Bänsch D, Ernst S, Schaumann S, Hachiya H, Chen M, Chun J, Falk P, Khanedani A, Antz M, Kuck KH. Complete isolation of the left atrium surrounding the pulmonary veins: new insights from the double Lasso technique in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2004; 110: 2090–2096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arentz, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kalusche, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Arentz, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kalusche, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs