| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2007;116:2992-3005.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Cardiovascular Involvement in General Medical Conditions |
From the University of Michigan Health System (M.K.H., V.M., F.J.M.), Ann Arbor, Mich, and Temple University School of Medicine (G.C.), Philadelphia, Pa.
Correspondence to Fernando J. Martinez, MD, MS, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, 3916 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI. E-mail fmartine{at}umich.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
Key Words: pulmonary heart disease pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive hypertension, pulmonary inflammation
| Introduction |
|---|
| Pulmonary Vascular Disease in Respiratory Illness |
|---|
PH in hypoxemic lung diseases is likely the result of multiple factors including pulmonary vasoconstriction caused by alveolar hypoxia,7 acidemia,7 hypercarbia,8 the distortion of pulmonary vessels by parenchymal changes, and increased cardiac output and blood viscosity from polycythemia secondary to hypoxia. This has been best conceptualized in COPD (Figure 1). The hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstrictor response is an important adaptive mechanism in human physiology, shunting blood away from hypoxic regions toward better-ventilated areas of the lung, thus improving ventilation-perfusion matching within the lung. Pulmonary vascular remodeling in response to hypoxia is also mediated by a number of other factors including nitric oxide,9 endothelin,10 serotonin, and hypoxia inducible factor-1. The role of inflammatory mediators has become increasingly accepted.11,12 Acidosis increases pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and acts synergistically with hypoxia.7 With the development of structural changes such as intimal proliferation and smooth muscle cell hypertrophy, sustained PH ensues.
|
The RV is a thin-walled, compliant, low-pressure chamber that pumps the same stroke volume as the left ventricle (LV) with
25% of the stroke work because of the normally low resistance of the pulmonary vasculature.13 The right coronary artery provides the blood supply to the RV free wall in both systole and diastole. When chronically pressure-overloaded, the RV hypertrophies and dilates, which results in both systolic and diastolic dysfunction.14 RV ischemia may also result because the right coronary artery is unable to provide adequate flow to the hypertrophied RV, caused in part by the reduced right coronary artery to right ventricular cavity pressure gradient in both systole and diastole. RV dysfunction is one of the most important prognostic factors in idiopathic PH.15 In addition, hyperinflation seen in patients with obstructive lung disease may also decrease venous return, further reducing right ventricular filling. In restrictive lung disease, the inability of the thoracic cage to distend has also been postulated to impair cardiac filling.16
The degree of LV dysfunction secondary to RV dysfunction has been an issue of debate. The RV and LV share the interventricular septum and the pericardial sack, both of which may allow 1 ventricle to influence the other. The limited ability of the pericardium to stretch means that a large change in the volume of the RV may limit the volume of the LV because of a leftward shift of the interventricular septum. The markedly negative swings in pleural pressure that occur in patients with lung disease may also contribute to increases in pulmonary artery pressures (PAP) and increases in venous return to the right heart.17 Subsequent RV dilation may cause the LV to become stiffer, thus theoretically increasing LV end-diastolic pressure, decreasing pulmonary venous return, and reducing LV stroke volume. LV afterload may also increase with the fall in pleural pressure during inspiration, which may increase LV end-diastolic volume and thus decrease LV ejection fraction. In a retrospective review of 434 patients with end-stage pulmonary disease including COPD, interstitial lung disease, and PH (primary and Eisenmengers syndrome), the prevalence of RV dysfunction (RV ejection fraction <45%) was 66%, with prevalence being greater in those with PH as opposed to airway or parenchymal lung disease.18 However, LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction <45%) was present in only 6.4% of patients, being more common in patients with PH (19.6%) as opposed to those with parenchymal or airway disease (3.6%). Thus clinically, ventricular interdependence likely plays a greater role when PH is severe.
| Clinical Presentation |
|---|
Several ECG findings reflective of cor pulmonale have been reported, including rightward P-wave axis deviation, an S1S2S3 pattern, an S1Q3 pattern, evidence of RV hypertrophy, and right bundle-branch block.21 Low-voltage QRS has also been reported, more frequently seen in cor pulmonale associated with COPD than other pulmonary diseases. Unfortunately, ECG findings are insensitive for detection of PH. In a small series of COPD patients, only 33% of patients with elevated PVR had ECG signs of cor pulmonale.22 In a separate study of COPD patients, the presence of ECG abnormalities associated with cor pulmonale in addition to an elevated alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (>48 mm Hg) during oxygen therapy was associated with a 1.8 greater risk of death.21 Thus ECG abnormalities suggestive of RV hypertrophy can be helpful if present, but if the clinical picture is still suggestive of cor pulmonale, further testing should be pursued.
The chest x-ray may demonstrate enlargement of the proximal pulmonary arteries and reduction in retrosternal air space. Although echocardiography is an invaluable tool in the evaluation of most forms of PH,23 its utility is more limited in patients with parenchymal lung disease because suboptimal images are more frequently encountered. In a recent study of 374 lung transplant candidates, Doppler echocardiography and right heart catheterization were performed within a 72-hour period.24 The correlation between pulmonary arterial pressures made by echocardiography versus catheterization can be seen in Figure 2. In almost half of cases patients were misclassified as having PH by echocardiography. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of RV systolic pressure estimation by echocardiography for the diagnosis of PH is outlined in Table 1. Overall sensitivity was 85% and specificity was 55%. Given that sensitivity is better than specificity, a normal echocardiogram can help exclude significant cor pulmonale, but an elevated estimated RV systolic pressure must be interpreted with caution.
|
|
Right heart catheterization is required to make a definitive diagnosis of PH.23 The hemodynamic definition includes a mean PAP
25 mm Hg with a wedge pressure (or LV end-diastolic pressure)
15 mm Hg and a calculated PVR
3 Wood Units. Pressures should be carefully measured at end expiration. The role of pulmonary venous hypertension, that is, elevated left-heart filling pressures caused most commonly by LV systolic or diastolic dysfunction, cannot be overlooked, requiring an accurate measurement of left-heart filling pressures via pulmonary artery occlusion pressure measurement. Frequently, patients with chronic lung disease have diastolic LV dysfunction and may have PH in the setting of an elevated pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. In these patients, more aggressive blood pressure control and diuresis should be initiated. The role of vasodilator testing has not been extensively studied in this population. In sarcoid-associated PH, a small series has suggested frequent vasoreactivity,25 whereas another group has not confirmed this26; the clinical significance of this finding remains unclear. Patients with significant PH should also be evaluated for chronic thromboembolic disease because this is a potentially treatable form of PH. A higher prevalence of pulmonary emboli in COPD patients with an acute exacerbation27 and in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients has been suggested.28
Surrogate markers for the presence of PH in advanced lung disease have been evaluated. Natriuretic peptides are produced and released by cardiac myocytes29; B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is produced and released by both the atria and ventricles. The propeptide circulates and is cleaved into a biologically active fragment and the N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).29 The NT-proBNP has a longer plasma half-life and considerably higher concentrations.29 Importantly, intraindividual coefficients of variation vary greatly. Levels tend to rise with advancing age, female gender, and renal dysfunction, and they decrease with increasing body mass index.29 BNP (level >33.3 pg/mL) has been suggested to be significantly elevated in patients with pulmonary fibrosis and PH.30 Sensitivity for moderate to severe PH was 100% and specificity was 89%. BNP has also been investigated in patients with COPD. A study that examined 38 patients with COPD, 20 with cor pulmonale, demonstrated a significant correlation between BNP and PAPs.31 Patients with cor pulmonale had significantly higher BNP levels than those without (73.9 pg/mL versus 21 pg/mL). In a separate study of 176 patients with chronic lung disease, elevated BNP level identified PH with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 88%; an increased BNP also was an independent risk factor for death.32 A recent study examined the value of BNP and NT-proBNP in outpatients diagnosed with COPD by their primary care physicians (spirometrically confirmed in 59%).33 BNP and NT-proBNP exhibited a high negative predictive value for systolic heart failure, slightly lower for diastolic heart failure; no patient had PH given the mild nature of the underlying pulmonary dysfunction. Given the high sensitivity of BNP for moderate to severe PH, we recommend including a BNP measurement in the evaluation of suspected PH. The combined utility of BNP in conjunction with echocardiography in patients with lung disease for the diagnosis of PH is an area where more prospective investigation is required.
Determination of the cause of increased dyspnea in patients with chronic lung disease is another arena where BNP measurement may be useful. Baseline BNP measurements may be elevated in COPD patients as compared with those without, but are not as high as those with heart failure.34 Substudy analysis of patients with asthma or COPD included in the Breathing Not Properly study revealed that a BNP cutoff of 100 pg/mL exhibited a 93.1% sensitivity, 77.3% specificity, 51.9% positive predictive value, and 97.7% negative predictive value for the diagnosis of heart failure, which was identified in 20.9% of patients.34 If added to clinical judgment, 95.4% of the congestive heart failure (CHF) subjects would have been diagnosed correctly. In the Brain Natriuretic Peptide for Acute Shortness of Breath Evaluation (BASEL) trial, patients with acute dyspnea were considered unlikely to have CHF with a BNP <100 pg/mL and very likely to have CHF with a BNP >500 pg/mL.35 Patients with BNP levels between 100 and 500 pg/mL were treated based on best clinical judgment. In a substudy that examined patients with chronic pulmonary disease (62% with COPD, 12% with asthma), the primary discharge diagnosis was CHF in 39% of patients and acute exacerbation of COPD in 33%. This approach resulted in significant reductions in length of stay and treatment costs. These data suggest that in patients with COPD, a low BNP (<100 pg/mL) can be very helpful in ruling out significant heart failure, and a very high BNP (>500 pg/mL) can be helpful in ruling in heart failure. Values between 100 and 500 pg/mL must be interpreted with caution and in context of the entire clinical picture.
| Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
|---|
|
Longitudinal data addressing PH in COPD are infrequent. One group examined 131 COPD patients who underwent 2 right heart catheterizations a mean of 6.8 years apart.44 At initial evaluation no patient had resting PH, although 76 patients exhibited exercise-induced PH. At the second evaluation 25% of patients exhibited resting PH (the majority in those patients with exercise-induced changes at initial evaluation); the magnitude of PH was mild. When PH is present in COPD, numerous groups have documented that its presence significantly increases the risk for hospitalization48 and is associated with worsened survival.49,50
Theoretically, any therapy for COPD that slows the loss of lung function should positively impact cor pulmonale. Of all COPD therapies, smoking cessation has the most significant clinical impact in slowing progression of disease, although there are no longitudinal data linking hemodynamic changes with smoking cessation.51
Oxygen Therapy
Oxygen is the only therapy for COPD that has been convincingly shown to improve PH and cor pulmonale and is 1 of the few noninvasive therapies for COPD that improves mortality. Two sentinel prospective, controlled studies of long-term O2 in COPD, the British Medical Research Council Long-Term Domiciliary Oxygen Treatment Trial and the Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial (NOTT), reported hemodynamic studies in small subsets of patients. In the British Medical Research Council trial, PVR increased to a greater extent in those not treated with O2 as opposed to those treated
15 hours/d with 2 L/d of O2.52 The NOTT investigators reported that both resting and exercise PVR were more sharply reduced in those using continuous O2.53,54 The reported changes in pulmonary hemodynamics, however, were small. Although the decreased PVR and increased stroke volume index were associated with reduced death, NOTT failed to demonstrate that supplemental O2 was responsible for either the hemodynamic changes or the survival difference. In addition, the NOTT hemodynamic data were limited to longitudinal measurement performed only once after treatment, a time point that may have been too soon to document substantial O2-induced changes in hemodynamic variables. Finally, the NOTT was also unable to predict the long-term hemodynamic effects of O2 on the basis of patients acute responses to O2. Three subsequent, small studies examined the long-term effects of supplemental oxygen on the pulmonary circulation in COPD.55–57 Long-term O2 administration does appear to be associated with modest decreases in PAPs. However, the interruption of daily oxygen is followed by an increase in PVR. These studies, however, were small and lacked fully characterized subjects and documentation of compliance with O2. They leave unclear the effect of intermittent versus continuous use of supplemental O2 on hemodynamics in chronic mild-moderate hypoxemic COPD.
Vasodilators
There are limited data regarding the role of vasodilators to ameliorate PH in COPD patients. One group examined the effects of sildenafil (50 mg intravenously once followed by 50 mg twice daily orally for 3 months) in 6 patients with severe COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 16% to 48% predicted).58 The intravenous dose decreased mean PAP, whereas 3 months of dosing led to decreases in mean PAP in 5 patients who completed the study (30.2 mm Hg to 24.6 mm Hg). In contrast, in a separate study 48 weeks of losartan led to little beneficial result in 40 COPD patients with PH.59 Similarly, a single administration of nifedipine resulted in modest improvement in mean PAP without much change in PVR in 33 COPD patients.60 Importantly, in a series of 6 patients with PH secondary to COPD, nifedipine reduced PVR but decreased arterial PaO2 as a result of alteration in V/Q matching.61
| Interstitial Lung Disease |
|---|
The prevalence of PH in patients with DPLDs varies greatly.62,66,67 Table 3 presents recent studies of IPF. The prevalence has varied from as low as 8% to as high as 84%. As in COPD, diagnostic modality and criteria contribute to the variability between studies, with prevalence tending to be higher where echocardiography was used. The recent work of Hamada and colleagues sheds the most valuable insight. This group performed a right heart catheterization on 61 IPF patients at initial evaluation.64 At the time of initial evaluation only 8.1% of patients exhibited PH; importantly the presence of elevated PAPs was associated with impaired survival. Studies of patients undergoing evaluation for lung transplantation have consistently demonstrated a higher prevalence (Table 3).63,65 An autopsy evaluation study of the RV in patients with IPF and emphysema suggests that the prevalence of RV enlargement between the 2 groups is similar.69 These data, however, may be biased by the fact that all individuals were deceased and clearly ill, thus the prevalence of PH and frequency of disease in IPF as compared with emphysema in less severely ill patients may differ. In another study of IPF patients alone, the presence of resting hypoxemia (pulse oximetry
88% or a PaO2
55 mm Hg) combined with a carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO)
40% predicted identified the presence of PH with a positive predictive value of 87% and negative predictive value of 82%.63 A separate retrospective study of 118 IPF patients (40.7% with PH) noted a modest correlation between DLCO and PH; DLCO < 30% predicted was associated with a 2-fold higher prevalence of PH.65 Thus in patients with IPF, a low DLCO and resting hypoxemia should raise clinical suspicion for PH.
|
Table 3 also confirms a similar wide range of prevalence rates in sarcoidosis that likely reflects differences in the patient populations, diagnostic modality, and diagnostic criteria among studies. As such, patients listed for lung transplantation seem to have greater PH than a more general group of sarcoid patients. In general a lower total lung capacity is associated with PH in this setting,68 although a second group noted only weak association between DLCO and pulmonary pressures.26
The distinction between primary PH and secondary PH in DPLD becomes a little less clear. Hypoxic vasoconstriction contributes to the development of PH in DPLD.70 Destruction and obliteration of the vasculature secondary to loss of lung parenchyma and fibrosis likely also plays a role.70,71 Studies in IPF have reported loss of blood vessels in areas of honeycomb lung and reductions in the mean capillary surface area.72,73 Vessel compression may lead to in situ thrombosis, fibrous organization of vessels, and luminal obliteration.74 Abnormal anastomoses between the pulmonary and systemic circulation have also been noted in patients with IPF.75 The degree to which PH in IPF results directly from pulmonary vascular remodeling is unknown, but has been proposed as a possible explanation for the apparent disconnect in some patients between the degree of ventilatory restriction, PH, and survival.70 Primary vascular involvement may be present in sarcoidosis; obstruction of vessel walls by granulomas or perivascular fibrosis has been described.76
Antiinflammatory Therapy
Antiinflammatory agents have been commonly used in treating DPLDs. Very little data that address the effect of antiinflammatory therapy on pulmonary vascular disease in DPLDs are available. Theoretically, agents that slow progression of fibrotic lung disease should also slow progression of pulmonary vascular abnormalities. Several groups have examined the effect of corticosteroid treatment on PH in patients with sarcoidosis. In a retrospective case series of 10 patients with sarcoidosis and PH who were treated with either 0.5 to 1 mg/kg per d oral prednisone in addition to methotrexate or cyclophosphamide, 31.8% of the patients had PH in the absence of pulmonary fibrosis.26 Three of the 5 cases with PH and no pulmonary fibrosis experienced substantial and sustained improvement, which suggests that primary vasculopathy may play a significant role in PH in sarcoidosis that may be responsive to antiinflammatory therapies, but more research is needed prior to recommending routine antiinflammatory therapy to patients with sarcoidosis and PH in the absence of pulmonary fibrosis.
Oxygen Therapy
Several studies have shown that oxygen desaturation is associated with poorer prognosis in IPF.77–79 Scant data exist addressing the role of oxygen therapy in DPLD patients. A Cochrane review identified only 1 randomized controlled trial that failed to show a mortality difference between the oxygen-treated and control group.80
Advanced Therapies
Very limited data exist regarding novel vasodilators in DPLD patients. Such therapies can theoretically worsen ventilation-perfusion mismatch and thereby increase hypoxemia. One group documented that both sildenafil and intravenous epoprostenol decreased PVR in 16 patients with PH and pulmonary fibrosis; sildenafil improved oxygenation whereas epoprostenol decreased arterial oxygenation.81 An open-label study of sildenafil in 14 IPF patients suggested an increased 6-min walk distance (49 meters), although 3 of the subjects could not finish the 3-month study.82 A retrospective study of 8 patients with sarcoidosis-associated PH noted hemodynamic improvement during an acute vasodilator trial in 6/7 patients; 5 of the 6 responding patients continued chronic therapy with an average clinical improvement of 1 to 2 New York Heart Association/World Health Organization classes.83 Such therapies should be considered investigational in DPLD patients.
| Neuromuscular and Chest Wall Diseases |
|---|
Therapy
Relief of hypoxemia has been demonstrated to improve hemodynamics. In a study of 8 patients with severe Duchenne muscular dystrophy, right heart catheterization documented severe PH in 5 patients. Correction of hypoxemia relieved the PH.89 Oxygen therapy alone, however, does not correct the hypoventilation that causes hypoxemia and may actually worsen preexisting hypercapnia. Frequently, therapy with nocturnal ventilation, either via tracheotomy and intermittent positive pressure ventilation or via noninvasive ventilation, may alleviate the symptoms of respiratory failure and correct hypercapnia, hypoxemia, and acidosis. Patients should be considered for nocturnal ventilation if daytime PaCO2 exceeds or equals 45 mm Hg or if nocturnal hypoventilation with sustained oxygen desaturation and symptoms of sleep disturbance are present.90 Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation has been documented in patients with neuromuscular and chest wall diseases to improve nocturnal alveolar hypoventilation, dyspnea, and symptoms associated with sleep-disordered breathing. In chest wall diseases, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation but not oxygen improves dyspnea and symptoms associated with sleep disturbance.91 Patients treated with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation demonstrate improved nocturnal and daytime oxygen saturations as compared with the group treated with oxygen alone. Several case reports have suggested that cor pulmonale can be at least partially reversed, and PH improved with the initiation of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with restrictive lung disease, although no prospective studies have specifically addressed this issue. Invasive ventilation with tracheostomy has also been demonstrated to RV failure in patients with restrictive lung disease.92
| Disorders of Ventilatory Control |
|---|
OHS is characterized by hypersomnolence, dyspnea, and resting hypoxemia, leading to PH in severe cases. Arterial blood gas testing is required to confirm daytime hypercapnia and typically demonstrates hypoxemia and a compensated respiratory acidosis. Laboratory testing may also reveal polycythemia caused by chronic hypoxemia. Whereas most patients with OSA do not have OHS, most patients with OHS have OSA. These patients frequently demonstrate both OSA and daytime hypoventilation, likely secondary to a combination of increased work of breathing and a decreased respiratory drive.
Although OSA is frequently cited as a cause of secondary PH and chronic daytime hypoxemia clearly leads to PH and cor pulmonale,95 the data that link intermittent nocturnal hypoxemia and PH are less clear.96 OSA alone may cause mild PH, but coexisting daytime hypoxia is typically required for sustained severe PH and cor pulmonale. In 1 observational study of 50 patients with OSA, patients with cor pulmonale had more severe nocturnal and daytime hypoxemia; nocturnal hypoxemia in the absence of daytime hypoxemia was not associated with cor pulmonale, suggesting that prolonged hypoxemia was necessary to cause cor pulmonale.97 An observational study of 27 patients with OSA reported that 41% had mild PH but none had severe PH or cor pulmonale.98 A study of 90 patients with frequent respiratory disturbances during sleep noted that patients with more frequent respiratory disturbances had a small but statistically significant increase in RV wall thickness but no differences in right atrial size, ventricular size, or ventricular function.99 Therefore it is difficult to ascribe severe PH and cor pulmonale to OSA alone.
In addition to PH, OSA has also been associated with the development of hypertension, most clearly demonstrated in the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort study, which linked the presence of moderate OSA with a 3-fold increased risk of incident hypertension.100 Three randomized controlled trials have also shown that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for OSA resulted in small but significant reductions in systemic hypertension (1.3 to 5.3 mm Hg).101–103 OSA has been associated with increased risk for arrhythmias (including sinus bradycardia, atrioventricular block, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular ectopy) and stroke.104 It has been hypothesized that the hypoxemia, hypercapnia, sympathetic activation, and blood pressure alterations that accompany OSA may also result in myocardial ischemia. The Sleep Heart Health Study did report OSA as an independent risk factor for the development of coronary artery disease.105 ST segment depressions are also more frequent in those with severe OSA,106 and CPAP therapy has been shown to reduce the duration of ST segment depressions in individuals with OSA.107 As with COPD, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels have also been demonstrated to be elevated in patients with OSA suggesting systemic inflammation may also be involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.104
Therapy
For patients with OSA and OHS, loss of 10 kg has been shown to significantly reduce daytime PaCO2 and facilitate treatment, although weight loss frequently is not curative.108 The mainstay of therapy for OSA is CPAP. Very few studies, however, have actually examined the effect of CPAP on PAP or cor pulmonale.109,110 The largest treatment effects have been noted in patients with elevated PAP prior to therapy. Theoretically, positive pressure ventilation may also have direct positive effects on cardiac function by decreasing preload, decreasing afterload, and improving LV performance. In a study of CPAP versus supplemental O2 in patients with chronic heart failure and central sleep apnea, patients who received CPAP for 12 weeks had significant improvements in LV ejection fraction.111
Surgical therapy for OSA includes uvulopalatopharyngoplasty, which may help select patients, and tracheostomy may be indicated in severe disease. A series of 19 patients undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty for OSA demonstrated a statistically significant increase in RV ejection fraction (45% to 50%, P=0.007).112 Tracheostomy can be considered both in treatment refractory OSA and OHS.
| Atherosclerosis and COPD |
|---|
COPD, like atherosclerosis,117 is a disease of systemic inflammation and as such may hasten the progression of atherosclerotic disease and contribute to the higher rate of cardiovascular-related morbidity and death in COPD. Recent evidence suggests that inflammation is noted in all stages of COPD; numerous systemic inflammatory markers, some of which are found in cardiovascular disease (IL-6, IL1-β, TNF-
, MMP-9, MCP-1, and high-sensitivity CRP), are elevated in COPD. Patients with more frequent or severe exacerbations exhibit particularly robust endogenous proinflammatory responses. A meta-analysis of 14 studies recently confirmed the association between reduced lung function in COPD and systemic inflammation (eg, CRP, fibrinogen, IL-6).118 A summary of studies examining CRP levels in COPD is presented in Table 4. It is notable that elevated CRP levels correlate with the presence of COPD, the presence of exacerbations, severity of lung function, and risk for hospitalization and death. Importantly, these correlations have therapeutic implications. Sin et al noted that withdrawal of inhaled steroids in 27 of 41 COPD patients with moderate-to-severe disease led to a mean 71% increase in serum CRP levels.130 Subsequent therapy with inhaled or oral steroids resulted in 50% and 63% reductions in CRP (P=0.039), respectively, whereas those receiving placebo had 8% reductions (NS). These data suggest that an inflammatory process within the COPD lung has systemic correlates and that antiinflammatory therapy can modulate this systemic inflammation. Another group suggested that COPD patients with PH exhibited higher serum CRP and TNF-
levels. Thus systemic inflammation may also play a role in the development of PH in COPD.12
|
Multiple clinical trials confirm that ischemic heart disease is a leading but underrecognized cause of death in COPD.131–133 In fact, COPD patients are at 2 to 3 times greater risk for cardiovascular death, accounting for almost 50% of all COPD deaths.132,134,135 An inverse relationship exists between FEV1 and the presence of atherosclerosis, or cardiovascular death. FEV1 is an independent predictor of cardiovascular death.136–138 Patients with an FEV1<2.0 L have a 5-fold increase in cardiovascular death risk compared with patients with an FEV1>2.0 L (relative risk; 5.03, 95% CI, 3.07 to 8.22).139 The magnitude of death attributed to reduced FEV1 in COPD is comparable to the magnitude of cardiovascular death attributable to hypercholesterolemia.140 Furthermore, FEV1 decline is associated with increased cardiovascular death.141
Additional support for a causal relationship between COPD and an increased risk for cardiovascular disease and death is provided by the Lung Health Study.142 More than 5887 patients with mild to moderate airways obstruction were followed, with 25% dying from a cardiovascular cause. Among patients hospitalized at least once over the 5-year period, cardiovascular causes accounted for 42% of the first hospitalizations and 48% of the second hospitalizations. The Tucson Epidemiologic Study of Airways Obstructive Disease reported cardiovascular as the primary cause of death in
50% of obstructive lung disease cases.132
Because 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) reduce cardiovascular risk beyond their lipid-lowering effects and these non–lipid-reducing actions of statins appear to be antiinflammatory in nature, it has been hypothesized that statin therapy could have significant clinical impact in patients with COPD. A recent retrospective analysis of a large Canadian database suggests that statin therapy in COPD patients with a low known risk for cardiovascular disease can have a profound effect on reducing the likelihood of COPD hospitalization and cardiovascular morbidity and death (Figure 3).143 A second, retrospective cohort study similarly suggested improved survival in COPD patients treated with statins (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.87).144
|
| Conclusion |
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Dr McLaughlin has received research grants from Actelion, Encysive, LungRx, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. She is a member of the speakers bureau of, received honoraria from, and is a member of an advisory board for Actelion, Gilead, and Pfizer. Dr Criner has received research grants from Actelion, Aeris, Boehringer Ingelheim, Emphasys, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and Schering Plough. He has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Sepracor. He is also a member of an advisory board for Actelion, Schering Plough, Sepracor, and Otsuka. Dr Martinez has received research grants from GlaxoSmithKline. He is a member of the speakers bureau, received honoraria from, and is a member of an advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer. He has also received honoraria payments and is a member of an advisory board for Altana Pharma and Novartis. Dr Han reports no conflicts.
| References |
|---|
2. Simonneau G, Galie N, Rubin LJ, Langleben D, Seeger W, Domenighetti G, Gibbs S, Lebrec D, Speich R, Beghetti M, Rich S, Fishman A Clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43 (suppl S): 5S–12S.
3. World Health Organization. Chronic cor pulmonale: a report of the expert committee. Circulation. 1963; 27: 594–598.
4. Niederman MS, Matthay RA. Cardiovascular function in secondary pulmonary hypertension. Heart Lung. 1986; 15: 341–351.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. MacNee W. Pathophysiology of cor pulmonale in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: part one. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994; 150: 833–852.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Ben Jrad I, Slimane ML, Boujnah MR, Ben Hamda K, Ameur Y. Prognosis and treatment of chronic cor pulmonale [in French]. Tunis Med. 1993; 71: 505–508.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Enson Y, Giuntini C, Lewis ML, Morris TQ, Ferrer MI, Harvey RM. The influence of hydrogen ion concentration and hypoxia on the pulmonary circulation. J Clin Invest. 1964; 43: 1146–1162.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Durand J, Le Roy Ladurie M, Ranson-Bitker B. Effects of hypoxia and hypercapnia on the repartition of pulmonary blood flow in supine subjects. Respir Res. 1970; 5: 156–165.
9. Clini E, Cremona G, Campana M, Scotti C, Pagani M, Bianchi L, Giordano A, Ambrosino N. Production of endogenous nitric oxide in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and patients with cor pulmonale: correlates with echo-Doppler assessment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 162: 446–450.
10. Cargill RI, Kiely DG, Clark RA, Lipworth BJ. Hypoxaemia and release of endothelin-1. Thorax. 1995; 50: 1308–1310.
11. Wright J, Levy R, Churg A. Pulmonary hypertension in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current theories of pathogenesis and their implications for treatment. Thorax. 2005; 60: 605–609.
12. Joppa P, Petrasova D, Stancak B, Tkacova R. Systemic inflammation in patients with COPD and pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2006; 130: 326–333.
13. Voelkel NF, Quaife RA, Leinwand LA, Barst RJ, McGoon MD, Meldrum DR, Dupuis J, Long CS, Rubin LJ, Smart FW, Suzuki YJ, Gladwin M, Denholm EM, Gail DB. Right ventricular function and failure: report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group on cellular and molecular mechanisms of right heart failure. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1883–1891.
14. Weitzenblum E. Chronic cor pulmonale. Heart. 2003; 89: 225–230.
15. McLaughlin VV, Presberg KW, Doyle RL, Abman SH, McCrory DC, Fortin T, Ahearn G Prognosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2004; 126 (suppl): 78S–92S.
16. Hsia CC. Cardiopulmonary limitations to exercise in restrictive lung disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31 (suppl): S28–S32.
17. MacNee W. Pathophysiology of cor pulmonale in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: part two. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994; 150: 1158–1168.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Vizza CD, Lynch JP, Ochoa LL, Richardson G, Trulock EP. Right and left ventricular dysfunction in patients with severe pulmonary disease. Chest. 1998; 113: 576–583.
19. Farber MO, Roberts LR, Weinberger MH, Robertson GL, Fineberg NS, Manfredi F. Abnormalities of sodium and H2O handling in chronic obstructive lung disease. Arch Intern Med. 1982; 142: 1326–1330.
20. Schafer JA. Robert F. Pitts Memorial Lecture: mechanisms coupling the absorption of solutes and water in the proximal nephron. Kidney Int. 1984; 25: 708–716.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Incalzi RA, Fuso L, De Rosa M, Di Napoli A, Basso S, Pagliari G, Pistelli R. Electrocardiographic signs of chronic cor pulmonale: a negative prognostic finding in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Circulation. 1999; 99: 1600–1605.
22. Burrows B, Kettel LJ, Niden AH, Rabinowitz M, Diener CF. Patterns of cardiovascular dysfunction in chronic obstructive lung disease. N Engl J Med. 1972; 286: 912–918.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. McGoon M, Gutterman D, Steen V, Barst R, McCrory DC, Fortin TA, Loyd JE Screening, early detection, and diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2004; 126 (suppl): 14S–34S.
24. Arcasoy SM, Christie JD, Ferrari VA, Sutton MS, Zisman DA, Blumenthal NP, Pochettino A, Kotloff RM. Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with advanced lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003; 167: 735–740.
25. Preston IR, Klinger JR, Landzberg MJ, Houtchens J, Nelson D, Hill NS. Vasoresponsiveness of sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2001; 120: 866–872.
26. Nunes H, Humbert M, Capron F, Brauner M, Sitbon O, Battesti JP, Simonneau G, Valeyre D. Pulmonary hypertension associated with sarcoidosis: mechanisms, haemodynamics and prognosis. Thorax. 2006; 61: 68–74.
27. Tillie-Leblond I, Marquette C, Perez T, Scherpereel A, Zanetti C, Tonnel A, Remy-Jardin M. Pulmonary embolism in patients with unexplained exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence and risk factors. Ann Int Med. 2006; 144: 390–396.
28. Panos RJ, Mortenson RL, Niccoli SA, King TE Jr. Clinical deterioration in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: causes and assessment. Am J Med. 1990; 88: 396–404.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Burke MA, Cotts WG. Interpretation of B-type natriuretic peptide in cardiac disease and other comorbid conditions. Heart Fail Rev. 2007; 12: 23–36.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Leuchte HH, Neurohr C, Baumgartner R, Holzapfel M, Giehrl W, Vogeser M, Behr J. Brain natriuretic peptide and exercise capacity in lung fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004; 170: 360–365.