Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;116:2018-2028
Published online before print October 15, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.712935
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
116/18/2018    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.712935v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pijnappels, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schalij, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pijnappels, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schalij, M. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
Medline Plus Health Information
*Scars
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Cell biology/structural biology
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Gene therapy

(Circulation. 2007;116:2018-2028.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology

Resynchronization of Separated Rat Cardiomyocyte Fields With Genetically Modified Human Ventricular Scar Fibroblasts

Daniël A. Pijnappels, MSc; John van Tuyn, MSc; Antoine A.F. de Vries, PhD; Robert W. Grauss, MSc, MD; Arnoud van der Laarse, PhD; Dirk L. Ypey, PhD; Douwe E. Atsma, MD, PhD; Martin J. Schalij, MD, PhD

From the Departments of Cardiology (D.A.P., J.v.T., R.W.G., A.v.d.L., D.L.Y., D.E.A., M.J.S.) and Molecular Cell Biology (J.v.T., A.A.F.d.V.), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Douwe E. Atsma, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300RC Leiden, the Netherlands.

Received May 2, 2007; accepted August 31, 2007.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with the presence of slow or nonconducting scar tissue. Genetic modification of scar tissue, aimed at improving conduction, may be a novel approach to achieve effective resynchronization. Therefore, the feasibility of resynchronization with genetically modified human ventricular scar fibroblasts was studied in a coculture model.

Methods and Results— An in vitro model was used to study the effects of forced expression of the myocardin (MyoC) gene in human ventricular scar fibroblasts (hVSFs) on resynchronization of 2 rat cardiomyocyte fields separated by a strip of hVSFs. Furthermore, the effects of MyoC expression on the capacity of hVSFs to serve as pacing sites were studied. MyoC-dependent gene activation in hVSFs was examined by gene and immunocytochemical analysis. Forced MyoC expression in hVSFs decreased dyssynchrony, expressed as the activation delay between 2 cardiomyocyte fields (control hVSFs 27.6±0.2 ms [n=11] versus MyoC-hVSFs 3.6±0.3 ms [n=11] at day 8, P<0.01). Also, MyoC-hVSFs could be stimulated electrically, which resulted in simultaneous activation of the 2 adjacent cardiomyocyte fields. Forced MyoC expression in hVSFs led to the expression of various connexin and cardiac ion channel genes. Intracellular measurements of MyoC-hVSFs coupled to surrounding cardiomyocytes showed strongly improved action potential conduction.

Conclusions— Forced MyoC gene expression in hVSFs allowed electrical stimulation of these cells and conferred the ability to conduct an electrical impulse at high velocity, which resulted in resynchronization of 2 separated cardiomyocyte fields. Both phenomena appear mediated mainly by MyoC-dependent activation of genes that encode connexins, strongly enforcing intercellular electrical coupling.


Key Words: electrical stimulation • electrophysiology • cell culture • gene therapy • fibroblasts


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Myocardial infarction results in replacement of well-coupled electrically active cardiomyocytes by scar tissue, which contains primarily nonexcitable fibroblasts and an electrically insulating extracellular matrix.1 Consequently, coordinated impulse propagation across scarred myocardium is impaired owing to local conduction block and slow conduction.2 This impairment leads to inefficient and inhomogeneous electrical and mechanical activation of different parts of the myocardium, which results in increased left ventricular dyssynchrony and diminished left ventricular contractile performance.3,4 Ultimately, this may result in clinical symptoms of heart failure.

Clinical Perspective p 2028

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a successful treatment modality for patients with drug-refractory heart failure and significant left ventricular dyssynchrony.5–7 However, {approx}30% of patients do not respond. Recently, among other causes, an ischemic cause of heart failure was considered as a predictor of nonresponsiveness to CRT.8 More specifically, the extent of both viable and scarred myocardium,9 as well as the location of scar tissue,10 was shown to be predictive for the response to CRT. Importantly, scar burden appears to be involved in both the cause of ventricular dyssynchrony and the lack of response to CRT.

Recently, we demonstrated that overexpression of the gene that encodes the transcription factor myocardin (MyoC) induces the synthesis of cardiac proteins in human nonmuscle cell types,11 including cardiac ion channels and connexins (Cxs).12 Because these proteins are essential in cardiac action potential (AP) transmission and are absent or only present at low levels in native human ventricular scar fibroblasts (hVSFs), it was hypothesized that genetic modification of scar tissue cells with a recombinant MyoC gene might be a novel approach to treat conduction abnormalities. In the present study, the potential of MyoC-transduced hVSFs to resynchronize and stimulate cardiac tissue in a standardized in vitro model was investigated.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Model of Experimental Resynchronization
All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Experiments Committee and comply with the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" of the US National Institutes of Health.

Isolation, Culturing, and Preparation of Cardiomyocytes and Myocardial Scar Fibroblasts
Cardiomyocytes were dissociated from ventricles of 2-day-old male neonatal Wistar rats and grown in culture medium supplemented with 5% horse serum, penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 µg/mL; all from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif), as described previously.13 The hVSFs were isolated from human myocardial scar tissue of 8 different patients who underwent surgical reconstruction of the left ventricle. Each sample was dissected into small pieces, covered by glass coverslips, and cultured in porcine gelatin-coated culture dishes containing Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen). Outgrowth of cells was first seen after 2 days of culture, and after another 3 days, coverslips and tissue pieces were removed, with the hVSFs left attached to the culture dish. Next, hVSFs were trypsinized, counted, and replated at 70% confluence. Cultures were refreshed every 3 days, and passage numbers 4 to 8 were used for further experiments. Importantly, culturing of the hVSFs on poly-D-lysine plates as described by Smith et al14 did not give rise to cardiospheres, which makes contamination of the hVSFs with cardiac progenitor cells unlikely. Before experiments, hVSFs were transduced with vesicular stomatitis virus G-protein–pseudotyped lentivirus vectors encoding either human MyoC and enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP; MyoC-hVSFs) or β-galactosidase and eGFP (LacZ-hVSFs) as control. For this purpose, hVSFs were seeded at a density of 2x104 cells/cm2 in 10-cm2 culture dishes and infected in the presence of 20 µg/mL diethylaminoethyl-dextran sulfate (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden), at a multiplicity of infection of 8 HeLa cell–transducing units per cell. After 4 hours of incubation, the cells were washed 3 times and cultured for 5 to 7 days before being seeded in microelectrode array culture dishes and before analysis of ion channel and connexin gene expression. The nucleotide sequences of the shuttle plasmids used to generate the lentivirus vectors are deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers EF205034 and EF205035.

Microelectrode Arrays
Cardiomyocytes were cultured in microelectrode array culture dishes (MEAs, Multichannel Systems, Reutlingen, Germany). Before plating, MEAs were glow-discharged and coated with collagen to improve adhesion of cells. Electrical activation maps were generated after 2 days of culture to confirm the presence of a synchronously beating monolayer. After 3 days of culture, the monolayer was divided into 2 fields of cardiomyocytes by an acellular channel either (A) 250 to 300 µm or (B) 300 to 350 µm wide, which crossed the entire diameter of the culture dish. The acellular channel was generated by 2 preprogrammed linear laser dissections with a PALM Microlaser System, which included PALM RoboSoftware version 4.0 (Microlaser Technologies GmbH, Bernried, Germany). Removal of the strip of monolayer between the 2 laser dissection lines created an acellular channel that electrically separated the 2 cardiomyocyte fields. Cells were applied in a channel-crossing pattern after we ensured that no cells or cell debris was present in the channel and after we confirmed the presence of a conduction block between the 2 cardiomyocyte fields. Application of cells was achieved with a pipette mounted in a micromanipulator and a light microscope (20x magnification). To study electrical dyssynchrony (group A), the channel was filled with 3x104 eGFP-labeled LacZ-hVSFs, 3x104 eGFP-labeled MyoC-hVSFs, or 3x104 cardiomyocytes. In an additional set of control experiments, no cells were applied. To investigate electrical stimulation (group B), 5x104 labeled cells were applied to the channel to reach confluence. After 24 hours, the culture medium was refreshed to remove nonattached cells. In group A, the effect of cell transplantation on resynchronization was assessed for 8 days. In group B, resynchronization driven by electrical stimulation of the transplanted cells was investigated over the same period of time.

Electrical Stimulation of Cell Cultures and Assessment of Dyssynchrony
Cultures were stimulated via an external pipette electrode (diameter 60 µm) that produced bipolar rectangular pulses (1.5x threshold, pulse width 10 ms, 1 to 2 Hz) placed {approx}1 mm above the cell layer. Cultures were stimulated for at least 30 seconds at a fixed location in the center of the upper cardiomyocyte field before recordings were started. Two-dimensional color-coded activation maps and conduction velocities (CVs) were derived as described previously.13 Electrical recoupling of the 2 cardiomyocyte fields was defined as the presence of a consistent correlation between local electrical activation times recorded at both fields for 30 seconds while the upper cardiomyocyte field was stimulated.

The correlation between electrical activation of the cardiomyocyte fields (local electrical activation time) and mechanical contraction (local mechanical activation time) of the cardiomyocyte fields was assessed by high-frame-rate (60 frames/s) video recordings of the cultures in the MEAs with a microscope equipped with a digital camera (Orca-RE, Hamamatsu Photonics Deutschland GmbH, Herrsching am Ammersee, Germany) and Openlab software (Improvision, Lexington, Mass).

Electrical Stimulation of Transplanted Cells and Assessment of Electrical Capture
The above-mentioned pipette electrode was used to stimulate at the site of hVSFs. The threshold was defined as the minimal current necessary to capture the beating cardiomyocyte culture. Stimulation was performed at twice the threshold. The electrode was placed within 1 mm above the strip of hVSFs under microscopic control with a micromanipulator and with a focused bundle of external light used to delineate the cell strip. Cell strips were stimulated for at least 30 seconds at a fixed location before recordings were started and color-coded activation maps were constructed. Electrical capture was considered to be present if a consistent phase relation between electrical stimulation of the cell strip and subsequent electrical activation of both the cardiomyocyte fields was observed for a period of 30 seconds.

Immunocytochemical and Genetic Analysis
Immunocytochemistry
Cocultures of 2x106 cardiomyocytes and 5x104 eGFP-labeled MyoC-hVSFs or LacZ-hVSFs were stained on day 1 or day 8 with Cx40-, Cx43-, or Cx45-specific antibodies (Sigma, St Louis, Mo) to look for gap junctions. The primary antibodies were detected by goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to Alexa Fluor568 (Invitrogen). All antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:200. Staining was quantified in 6 cultures (60 cells per culture at 40x magnification) at each time point (threshold value 50 on a 0 to 255 gray-intensity scale). A fluorescence microscope equipped with a digital camera (Eclipse, Nikon Europe, Badhoevedorp, Netherlands) and dedicated software (Image-Pro Plus, version 4.1.0.0, Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, Md) were used for data analysis. All cocultures of cardiomyocytes and eGFP-labeled hVSFs were stained with the same solutions, and equal exposure times were used for all recordings.

Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis
Semiquantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses were performed as reported previously,12 including primer pairs that targeted transcripts encoding the {alpha}-subunit of the cardiac voltage-gated sodium channel (SCN5A or Nav1.5), the {alpha}1C-subunit of the voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel (CACNA1C or Cav1.2), and the inward rectifier potassium channel J3 (KCNJ3, also known as Kir3.1). An overview of all primer pairs used for RT-PCR is given in the Table. As internal controls for the quantity and quality of the RNA specimens, RT-PCR amplifications that targeted transcripts of the housekeeping gene GAPDH were performed in parallel. PCRs performed on cDNA derived from total RNA samples of human atrium, ventricle, vascular smooth muscle, and skeletal muscle served as positive controls; PCRs in which the cDNA was replaced by water were included as negative controls. For comparisons of relative mRNA levels, only PCR samples from within the linear range of amplification were used.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table. Primer Sequences and PCR Conditions Used for RT-PCR Analysis

Whole-Cell Patch-Clamp Measurements
Cocultures of 2x106 cardiomyocytes and 5x104 eGFP-labeled MyoC-hVSFs or LacZ-hVSFs were used for intracellular measurements at day 1 and day 8 of culture. After identification of hVSFs with fluorescence microscopy, APs in cardiomyocytes and hVSFs surrounded by 3 to 5 beating cardiomyocytes were recorded in the current-clamp configuration.15 Whole-cell recordings were performed at 25°C with an L/M-PC patch-clamp amplifier (3-kHz filtering; List-Medical, Darmstadt, Germany). The pipette solution contained (in mmol/L) 10 Na2ATP, 115 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 5 EGTA, 10 HEPES/KOH (pH 7.4). Tip and seal resistance was 2.0 to 2.5 M{Omega} and >1 G{Omega}, respectively. The bath solution contained (in mmol/L) 137 NaCl, 4 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 10 HEPES (pH 7.4). For data acquisition and analysis, pClamp/Clampex8 software (Axon Instruments, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, Calif) was used. AP characteristics in cardiomyocytes, LacZ-hVSFs, and MyoC-hVSFs were evaluated at days 1 and 8. At the same time points, input resistance of whole cells coupled to their surrounding cells (3 to 5 in number) was measured in voltage clamp by dividing the applied voltage steps (10 mV, 200 ms) by the stationary membrane current change and subtracting the access resistance (4 to 7 M{Omega}). The input conductance (reverse of resistance) was considered as an approximate measure of intercellular coupling under the present study conditions.16 Functionality of ion channels was assessed in single cells with appropriate voltage-clamp protocols during the 8 days of culture.17

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 11.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). Data were compared with 1-way or 2-factor mixed ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons and expressed as mean±SD. Linear correlation analysis was performed by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Probability values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Calculation of sample size and power for the experiments was less appropriate because the expected means and SDs were difficult to estimate; however, the pronounced effects of myocardin suggest that only a limited number of experiments would have rendered significant results.

The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Myocardin Gene Expression in hVSFs and Resynchronization
Electrical activation of the cardiomyocyte fields (local electrical activation time) was directly related to mechanical contraction (local mechanical activation time) of the cardiomyocyte fields during the entire course of the experiments (Figure 1). During this period, no mechanical activity was observed in the center of cell strips that consisted of LacZ-hVSFs or MyoC-hVSFs, as examined by light microscopy.


Figure 1187017
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Comparison of local electrical activation time based on electrograms with local mechanical activation time based on video recordings, described as Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R). Left, Assessment at day 1 showed a direct relation (R2=0.98) between local electrical and mechanical activation time. Right, A persistent direct relation (R2=0.97) between both activation times was found at day 8.

After 3 days of culture, only cardiomyocyte monolayers with a high degree of structural and functional homogeneity, as determined by light microscopy and electrophysiological mapping, were included in the study (yield {approx}60%). By laser dissection, an acellular channel (group A, 230±10 µm; group B, 335±15 µm) was created in the MEAs, which resulted in 2 asynchronously beating cardiomyocyte fields. Asynchronous beating was associated with maximal dyssynchrony ({infty}) between the 2 cardiomyocyte fields. Application of LacZ-hVSFs (n=12) in group A resulted in resynchronization of the 2 cardiomyocyte fields within 24 hours. Resynchronization was associated with a relatively large conduction delay (latency) of 28±1 ms and a low CV of 2.1±0.4 cm/s across the LacZ-hVSFs between the 2 cardiomyocyte fields (Figures 2A, 2E, and 2F). Electrograms derived from the LacZ-hVSF strip showed clear signs of decremental conduction. During follow-up until day 8 of culture, conduction delay and CV did not change significantly (n=11; Figures 3A, 3E, 3F, and 4Down). Application of MyoC-hVSFs (n=11) in group A also resulted in synchronized beating of the 2 cardiomyocyte fields within 24 hours, but with a smaller conduction delay of 20±1.5 ms and a CV of 3±0.7 cm/s (Figures 2B, 2E, and 2F). In contrast to the experiment performed with LacZ-hVSFs, conduction delay between the 2 cardiomyocyte fields coupled by MyoC-hVSFs decreased progressively to 4±1 ms at day 8 (n=11), with a corresponding increase in CV to 18±1.2 cm/s (P<0.01 versus LacZ-hVSFs; Figures 3B, 3E, 3F, and 4Down). Furthermore, the decremental nature of conduction had disappeared. The acellular controls (n=12) showed asynchrony between the 2 cardiomyocyte fields during follow-up (Figures 2C, 2E, 3C, and 3DownE). Application of cardiomyocytes (n=12) resulted in electrical coupling of the 2 cardiomyocyte fields within 1 day, associated with a conduction delay of 3±1 ms and a CV of 20.5±1 cm/s (Figures 2D, 2E, and 2F). No significant changes in conduction delay or CV were observed during follow-up in the cardiomyocyte group (Figures 3D, 3E, 3F, and 4Down). CV across cardiomyocyte fields was 21.1±1.7 cm/s (n=70), which is comparable to CV across cardiomyocytes applied between cardiomyocyte fields.


Figure 2187017
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Extracellular recordings at day 1 after application of (A) hVSFs (LacZ-hVSFs), (B) MyoC-hVSFs, (C) no cells, and (D) cardiomyocytes (CMCs). E, Response to electrical stimulation of 1 CMC field on distal CMC field at day 1. F, CV across LacZ-hVSFs, MyoC-hVSFs, and CMCs. Conduction block was present if no cells were applied in the channel between the 2 adjacent CMC fields. LacZ-hVSFs are presented as hVSFs in this Figure. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons: *P<0.05 vs MyoC-hVSFs, **P<0.01 vs CMCs.


Figure 3187017
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Extracellular electrophysiological recordings at day 8 after application of (A) hVSFs (LacZ-hVSFs), (B) MyoC-hVSFs, (C) no cells, and (D) cardiomyocytes (CMCs). E, Electrical stimulation of 1 CMC field resulted in activation of the distal CMC field after application of LacZ-hVSFs, MyoC-hVSFs, or CMCs. Electrical stimulation of acellular channel cultures resulted in nonresponse, associated with asynchrony throughout follow-up. F, CV across LacZ-hVSFs, MyoC-hVSFs, and CMCs. Conduction block was present in the absence of cells in the channel. LacZ-hVSFs are presented as hVSFs in this Figure. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons: *P<0.05 vs MyoC-hVSFs, **P<0.01 vs CMCs.


Figure 4187017
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. CV across CMCs, LacZ-hVSFs (presented as hVSFs), and MyoC-hVSFs, with the associated dyssynchrony between 2 CMC fields. No differences were found in CV or dyssynchrony in the cultures receiving CMCs or LacZ-hVSFs during follow-up. However, in cultures having MyoC-hVSFs, both CV and dyssynchrony were changed significantly in the first 8 days (P<0.01). One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons: {dagger}P<0.01 vs CMCs day 8. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA (with time point as factor) and Bonferroni-corrected: {ddagger}P<0.01.

Myocardin Gene Expression in hVSFs and Electrical Stimulation
In group B, a 330±15-µm-wide acellular channel was present after laser dissection. The pipette electrode was located successfully above the center of the hVSF strip in 7 of 10 experiments. The strip of cells was visually distinguishable throughout follow-up. One day after cell application to the channel, electrical stimulation at the LacZ-hVSFs site did not result in electrical capture (n=15). Also during follow-up (n=11), no electrical capture was observed (Figure 5B1). However, electrical stimulation at the site of MyoC-hVSFs was successful in 2 of 10 experiments at day 1 (n=15), resulting in electrical capture and subsequent activation of both cardiomyocyte fields (Figure 5B2). Interestingly, electrical stimulation at the site of MyoC-hVSFs was successful in 8 of 10 experiments at day 8 (n=10, P<0.001; Figure 5A). After application of cardiomyocytes, electrical stimulation at day 1 (n=16) resulted in electrical capture in 100% of the attempts (Figure 5B3). As expected, during 8 days of follow-up (n=15), the 100% success rate was maintained, which indicates stable activation of the cardiomyocyte fields (Figure 5A).


Figure 5187017
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Capacity of transplanted cells to serve as electrical access tissue. A and B1, No electrical capture was found after electrical stimulation of LacZ-hVSFs (presented as hVSFs) either at day 1 or day 8. A and B2, However, electrical stimulation of MyoC-hVSFs at day 1 resulted in electrical capture in 20% of the attempts, which increased to 80% at day 8. A and B3, Application of cardiomyocytes and subsequent electrical stimulation was associated with 100% success rate at both day 1 and day 8. Two-factor mixed ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons: *P<0.01 vs MyoC-hVSFs, **P<0.01 vs day 1.

Immunocytochemical and Genetic Analysis of Myocardin Gene Expression in hVSFs
Immunocytochemistry
After day 1 of culture, Cx43 staining was found in the cytoplasm of LacZ-hVSFs and between adjacent LacZ-hVSFs, where it displayed a punctuated pattern that reflected the presence of gap junctions (Figure 6B1). Staining for Cx40 and Cx45 was only weakly present in the cytoplasm, with some Cx40 (Figure 6A1) and Cx45 (Figure 6C1) staining between LacZ-hVSFs or around the nucleus in LacZ-hVSFs, respectively. MyoC-hVSFs displayed similar Cx40, Cx43, and Cx45 staining patterns as LacZ-hVSFs at day 1 of culture (Figures 6A3 through 6C3); however, in MyoC-hVSFs, the amount of Cx40 and Cx45 was much higher (3266±802% and 2733±681%, respectively) than in LacZ-hVSFs (P<0.001; Figures 6A6 and 6C6).


Figure 6187017
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Comparison of immunocytochemical analysis of Cx40, Cx43, and Cx45 between LacZ-hVSFs (presented as hVSFs) and MyoC-hVSFs at both day 1 and day 8 after culture and cardiomyocytes after 8 days of culture. Two-factor mixed ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons: *P<0.001 vs hVSFs at day 1, **P<0.05 vs MyoC-hVSFs at day 1; 1-way ANOVA, Bonferroni-corrected: ***P<0.05 vs cardiomyocytes.

Connexin levels in LacZ-hVSFs did not change significantly over time (Figures 6A2 through 6C2). In contrast, amounts of Cx40 and Cx45 in MyoC-hVSFs at day 8 were significantly higher than at day 1 (5233±492% and 4233±351%, respectively; P<0.05; Figures 6A3, 6A4, 6C3, 6C4, 6A6, and 6C6). Comparison of cardiac connexin levels between neonatal rat cardiomyocytes and MyoC-hVSFs at day 8 revealed that Cx43 amounts were >15 times higher in cardiomyocytes (P<0.01), whereas amounts of Cx40 and Cx45 were significantly higher in MyoC-hVSFs (>40 and 10 times, respectively; P<0.001; Figures 6A5 through 6C5 and 6A6 through 6C6).

RT-PCR Analysis
Differences in gene expression were studied between untreated hVSFs, LacZ-hVSFs, and MyoC-hVSFs, both at day 1 and at day 8 of culture (Figure 7). No or only minor differences existed in expression of the analyzed genes between hVSFs and LacZ-hVSFs. However, forced expression of MyoC in hVSFs upregulated the transcription of the genes SCN5A and CACNA1C, which encode the voltage-gated fast sodium channel and voltage-gated L-type calcium channel proteins, respectively. In addition, the expression levels of both SCN5A and CACNA1C increased in MyoC-hVSFs from day 1 to day 8 of culture. Furthermore, MyoC transduction led to a downregulation of KCNA4 expression, which was especially noticeable at day 8. No induction of KCNH2 or KCNJ2 was found in MyoC-hVSFs during follow-up. However, forced MyoC expression resulted in the time-dependent expression of the genes KCNJ3 and KCNJ8, both of which encode inward-rectifier potassium channel proteins. In addition, at day 8, MyoC-hVSFs but not LacZ-hVSFs were expressing KCNMB1, which encodes a voltage- and calcium-sensitive potassium channel protein. Analyses of MyoC gene transduction in hVSFs showed the increased expression of ion channels important for excitation17,18 and a significant increase in the expression of connexins, components that are essential for intercellular electrical conduction.


Figure 7187017
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of ion channel gene expression in untreated (U) hVSFs or in hVSFs expressing eGFP and either LacZ (L), or MyoC (M) at day 1 and day 8 after culture. MyoC gene transduction in hVSFs resulted in (increased) expression of SCN5A, CACNA1C, KCNJ3, KCNJ8, and KCNMB1. These genes were exclusively expressed or more expressed at day 8. In contrast, MyoC gene expression resulted in downregulation of KCNA4 expression. Expression of KCNH2 and KCNJ2 was not detectable in MyoC-hVSFs during follow-up. GAPDH and MyoC gene expression were used as reference. The dilution factor of the template DNA is indicated at the bottom of the Figure.

Intracellular Electrical Recordings
Intracellular patch-clamp recordings were performed in cocultures of LacZ-hVSFs (n=9) or MyoC-hVSFs (n=9) and cardiomyocytes (n=8) at day 1 and day 8 after culture initiation. Both LacZ-hVSFs and MyoC-hVSFs showed conducted APs. However, at day 1 of culture, MyoC-hVSFs showed larger conducted APs than LacZ-hVSFs (Figure 8A). During 8 days of culture, the maximum diastolic potential became more negative, and the conducted APs of MyoC-hVSFs increased significantly in amplitude and rate of rise and became comparable to APs derived from cardiomyocytes (Figure 8B and 8D1 through 8D4). This is in contrast to the maximum diastolic potentials and conducted APs of LacZ-hVSFs. Importantly, the estimated gap junctional conductance of the MyoC-hVSFs (n=9) increased significantly over time, from 18.1±5 to 80.3±18 nS, in contrast to LacZ-hVSFs (n=9; Figure 8C), which indicates a time-dependent increase in the degree of intercellular coupling after MyoC gene transfer in hVSFs.


Figure 8187017
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8. Intracellular patch-clamp measurements in LacZ-hVSFs (presented as hVSFs), MyoC-hVSFs, and cardiomyocytes (CMCs) at day 1 and day 8 of culture. Gj indicates gap junctional conductance; MDP, maximum diastolic potential; APA, AP amplitude; dV/dtmax, maximal upstroke velocity; and APD90, AP duration until 90% repolarization. Two-factor mixed ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons: *P<0.05 vs MyoC-hVSFs, **P<0.05 vs day 1.

Surprisingly, inward currents of ion channels typically involved in excitation (SCN5A, CACNA1C) were not recorded in MyoC-hVSFs at day 1 (n=8) or day 8 (n=8) of culture, despite their increased gene expression (Figure 7). These currents were easily measured in control cardiomyocytes (n=12).17


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The key findings of the present study are (1) application of MyoC gene–expressing hVSFs in an acellular channel between 2 cardiomyocyte fields resulted in resynchronization of 2 dyssynchronously beating cardiomyocyte fields, and (2) MyoC gene expression in hVSFs enabled simultaneous activation of the 2 adjacent cardiomyocyte fields by electrical stimulation of these cells, whereas it was not possible to stimulate via control hVSFs. Both phenomena appear to be mediated mainly by the MyoC-dependent activation of genes encoding connexins, strongly enforcing intercellular electrical coupling.

Role of Scar Tissue in Cardiac Dyssynchrony and Resynchronization
Scar tissue formation after myocardial infarction is associated with an accumulating population of electrically inert fibroblasts and extracellular matrix formation. Scar fibroblasts are not only nonexcitable and poorly coupled, thereby creating areas of conduction block and zones of slow conduction, but they also modulate excitability and conduction properties of surrounding cardiomyocytes.19 Previous studies reported on the limited capacity of cardiac fibroblasts to conduct electrical current over extended distances.20,21 As a result of modest expression levels of connexins between these cells and their nonexcitability, conduction is not only limited in distance but also in velocity. Efficient mechanical activation of the myocardium depends on a coordinated and fast spread of electrical activation across well-coupled excitable cardiomyocytes. Therefore, the presence of poorly coupled, electrically inert scar fibroblasts contributes to increased dyssynchrony between ventricular segments.

Resynchronization After Transplantation of MyoC-Expressing hVSFs
We demonstrated that transplantation of MyoC-expressing hVSFs in an acellular channel between 2 cardiomyocyte fields resulted in synchronization of the 2 fields, which was accompanied by an increase in CV both at day 1 and 8 of coculture compared with control hVSFs. Previously, Kizana et al22 showed that forced expression in dermal fibroblasts of the gene encoding the myogenic transcription factor MyoD resulted in excitability of some of these fibroblasts. However, because MyoD was used, the differentiated fibroblasts (now myotubes) did not express sufficient Cx43 to be electrically coupled to each other. Surprisingly, forced Cx43 expression in these myotubes even reduced the number of excitable cells (to <4%), possibly due to an increased electrotonic load. In the present study, we used hVSFs, and these cells already naturally express Cx43.

Although the electrophysiological mechanisms responsible for resynchronization in the present study remain to be determined in more detail, increased connexin expression in MyoC-hVSFs ensures improved intercellular coupling,13,21 whereas a minor role might be attributed to ion channels. Although both mRNAs and proteins associated with a number of essential ion channels involved in excitation are present in hVSFs after myocardin gene transduction, their functionality could not be shown. However, ion channels are complex structures, and several requirements are needed to ensure functionality.23 Nevertheless, the pore protein is present, which is at least necessary for the expression of a functional ion channel.24

Electrical Capture in hVSFs After Forced MyoC Expression
It was not possible to resynchronize the 2 cardiomyocyte fields at any moment by electrical stimulation of control hVSFs. However, after forced expression of the MyoC gene in hVSFs, electrical capture of the cardiomyocyte fields was observed in 20% of the experiments at day 1 and 80% of the experiments at day 8. In contrast to control hVSFs, which play a rather depressing role in conduction,25 hVSFs that overexpress MyoC allow rapid AP transmission. We also showed that MyoC-hVSFs were able to conduct the electrical pacing pulse to adjacent cardiomyocyte fields, which led to their electrical and mechanical activation. Hence, relatively high expression levels of connexin appear to be mandatory in successful electrical capture.

In Vitro to In Vivo Translation
Genetic modification of cells requires efficient transfection to ensure optimal expression of the gene of interest. Several vectors are available, but adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors appear preferable with regard to cardiac gene therapy in vivo, because they demonstrated good tissue penetration and sustained transgene expression.26

In the present study, we show the beneficial effects of myocardin gene overexpression in hVSFs on resynchronization; however, Badorff et al27 showed that a similar overexpression in neonatal cardiomyocytes resulted in hypertrophy. Therefore, not only is the efficiency of infection important to obtain an optimal effect, but the site-directed introduction and cell-type–specific expression of the gene is important to prevent a negative outcome. In addition, because the heart forms a functional electrical syncytium that comprises different cell types with different electrophysiological characteristics, it is of importance to study the adaptation of genetically modified cells in relation to properties of the target tissue.28

Possible Clinical Implications
Slowing and even blocking of the spread of activation by scarred myocardium is not the only deleterious consequence of myocardial scar formation. In previous clinical studies, we demonstrated the negative effects of scar tissue on the response to CRT.9,10,29 A significantly lower response rate was observed in patients with scars near the pacing electrode (14% versus 81% in patients without detectable scar tissue).10 In the present study, we demonstrated the striking effects of forced MyoC gene expression in hVSFs on electrical conduction. Genetic modification of hVSFs with a recombinant MyoC gene both resulted in resynchronization of 2 adjacent beating cardiomyocyte fields and endowed hVSFs with the ability to serve as a pacing site to capture the cardiac impulse. Although conducted ex vivo, the present study could provide a rationale for the treatment of scar-related myocardial dyssynchrony and contribute to the increased efficiency of CRT in patients with scarred myocardium.

Study Limitations
In the present study, myocardial scar tissue was represented by fibroblasts only. Although this model is sufficient to investigate the concept raised in the present study, it does not fully mimic the composition of myocardial scar tissue in vivo. Excessive extracellular matrix and surviving cardiomyocytes might influence the effects of MyoC expression in the infarcted area. Furthermore, neonatal rat cardiomyocytes were used in the present study. Although the use of human cardiomyocytes is preferable, the difficulties related to the availability of this cell type and their tendency to dedifferentiate during culture prevented the use of human cardiomyocytes.

Conclusions
Forced MyoC expression in hVSFs allowed resynchronization of 2 separated cardiomyocyte fields and establishment of interconnecting tissue for electrical pacing. Both phenomena primarily result from the MyoC-dependent activation of genes that encode connexins, thereby strongly enforcing intercellular electrical coupling.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Sun Y, Weber KT. Infarct scar: a dynamic tissue. Cardiovasc Res. 2000; 46: 250–256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Richards DA, Blake GJ, Spear JF, Moore EN. Electrophysiologic substrate for ventricular tachycardia: correlation of properties in vivo and in vitro. Circulation. 1984; 69: 369–381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Mathes P, Romig D, Sack D, Erhardt W. Experimental myocardial infarction in the cat, I: reversible decline in contractility of noninfarcted muscle. Circ Res. 1976; 38: 540–546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Spragg DD, Akar FG, Helm RH, Tunin RS, Tomaselli GF, Kass DA. Abnormal conduction and repolarization in late-activated myocardium of dyssynchronously contracting hearts. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 67: 77–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, DeLurgio DB, Leon AR, Loh E, Kocovic DZ, Packer M, Clavell AL, Hayes DL, Ellestad M, Trupp RJ, Underwood J, Pickering F, Truex C, McAtee P, Messenger J. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1845–1853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T, Walker S, Varma C, Linde C, Garrigue S, Kappenberger L, Haywood GA, Santini M, Bailleul C, Daubert JC. Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 873–880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, Tavazzi L. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1539–1549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Diaz-Infante E, Mont L, Leal J, Garcia-Bolao I, Fernandez-Lozano I, Hernandez-Madrid A, Perez-Castellano N, Sitges M, Pavon-Jimenez R, Barba J, Cavero MA, Moya JL, Perez-Isla L, Brugada J. Predictors of lack of response to resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 95: 1436–1440.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Ypenburg C, Schalij MJ, Bleeker GB, Steendijk P, Boersma E, Dibbets-Schneider P, Stokkel MP, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ. Impact of viability and scar tissue on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischaemic heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28: 33–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Bleeker GB, Kaandorp TA, Lamb HJ, Boersma E, Steendijk P, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2006; 113: 969–976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. van Tuyn J, Knaan-Shanzer S, van de Watering MJ, de Graaf M, van der Laarse A, Schalij MJ, van der Wall EE, de Vries AA, Atsma DE. Activation of cardiac and smooth muscle-specific genes in primary human cells after forced expression of human myocardin. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 67: 245–255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. van Tuyn J, Pijnappels DA, de Vries AA, de Vries I, van der Velde-van Dijke I, Knaan-Shanzer S, van der Laarse A, Schalij MJ, Atsma DE. Fibroblasts from human postmyocardial infarction scars acquire properties of cardiomyocytes after transduction with a recombinant myocardin gene. FASEB J. June 19, 2007. E-pub ahead of print.

13. Pijnappels DA, Schalij MJ, van Tuyn J, Ypey DL, de Vries AA, van der Wall EE, van der Laarse A, Atsma DE. Progressive increase in conduction velocity across human mesenchymal stem cells is mediated by enhanced electrical coupling. Cardiovasc Res. 2006; 72: 282–291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Smith RR, Barile L, Cho HC, Leppo MK, Hare JM, Messina E, Giacomello A, Abraham MR, Marban E. Regenerative potential of cardiosphere-derived cells expanded from percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy specimens. Circulation. 2007; 115: 896–908.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981; 391: 85–100.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Harks EG, Camina JP, Peters PH, Ypey DL, Scheenen WJ, van Zoelen EJ, Theuvenet AP. Besides affecting intracellular calcium signaling, 2-APB reversibly blocks gap junctional coupling in confluent monolayers, thereby allowing measurement of single-cell membrane currents in undissociated cells. FASEB J. 2003; 17: 941–943.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Roden DM, Balser JR, George AL Jr, Anderson ME. Cardiac ion channels. Annu Rev Physiol. 2002; 64: 431–475.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Nerbonne JM, Kass RS. Molecular physiology of cardiac repolarization. Physiol Rev. 2005; 85: 1205–1253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Kizana E, Ginn SL, Smyth CM, Boyd A, Thomas SP, Allen DG, Ross DL, Alexander IE. Fibroblasts modulate cardiomyocyte excitability: implications for cardiac gene therapy. Gene Ther. 2006; 13: 1611–1615.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Beeres SL, Atsma DE, van der Laarse A, Pijnappels DA, van Tuyn J, Fibbe WE, de Vries AA, Ypey DL, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ. Human adult bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells repair experimental conduction block in rat cardiomyocyte cultures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 1943–1952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Gaudesius G, Miragoli M, Thomas SP, Rohr S. Coupling of cardiac electrical activity over extended distances by fibroblasts of cardiac origin. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 421–428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Kizana E, Ginn SL, Allen DG, Ross DL, Alexander IE. Fibroblasts can be genetically modified to produce excitable cells capable of electrical coupling. Circulation. 2005; 111: 394–398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Hille B, Armstrong CM, MacKinnon R. Ion channels: from idea to reality. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 1105–1109.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Potapova I, Plotnikov A, Lu Z, Danilo P Jr, Valiunas V, Qu J, Doronin S, Zuckerman J, Shlapakova IN, Gao J, Pan Z, Herron AJ, Robinson RB, Brink PR, Rosen MR, Cohen IS. Human mesenchymal stem cells as a gene delivery system to create cardiac pacemakers. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 952–959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Camelliti P, Borg TK, Kohl P. Structural and functional characterisation of cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 65: 40–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Palomeque J, Chemaly ER, Colosi P, Wellman JA, Zhou S, Del Monte F, Hajjar RJ. Efficiency of eight different AAV serotypes in transducing rat myocardium in vivo. Gene Ther. 2007; 14: 989–997.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Badorff C, Seeger FH, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Glycogen synthase kinase 3beta inhibits myocardin-dependent transcription and hypertrophy induction through site-specific phosphorylation. Circ Res. 2005; 97: 645–654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. van Veen AA, van Rijen HV, Opthof T. Cardiac gap junction channels: modulation of expression and channel properties. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 51: 217–229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Bleeker GB, Schalij MJ, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ. Postero-lateral scar tissue resulting in nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006; 17: 899–901.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Myocardial scar tissue consists primarily of electrically inert fibroblasts. Consequently, impulse propagation and subsequent mechanical activation are hampered, resulting in increased ventricular dyssynchrony. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is a promising treatment for patients with heart failure and significant dyssynchrony that can improve cardiac function and increase life expectancy. However, {approx}30% of patients subjected to cardiac resynchronization therapy do not respond; this nonresponse has been associated with the presence of ventricular scar tissue. Scar burden appears to be involved in both the cause of dyssynchrony and the lack of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Modification of scar tissue, favoring electrical conduction, might therefore result in reduction of dyssynchrony and nonresponse. The present study provides a rationale for (1) treatment of scar-related myocardial dyssynchrony and (2) reduction of scar-related nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy. This reduction was accomplished by genetic modification of human ventricular scar fibroblasts by myocardin gene transfer. Myocardin is a cardiac transcription factor known to upregulate expression of cardiac genes, including connexins, which play a crucial role in electrical conduction. The present study shows that forced myocardin gene expression in scar fibroblasts allowed electrical stimulation of these cells and endowed them with the ability to conduct an electrical impulse at high velocity, which resulted in resynchronization of 2 separated cardiomyocyte fields. Genetic modification of myocardial scar tissue may be a promising therapy to resynchronize the infarcted myocardium, thereby improving cardiac function.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
D. A. Pijnappels, M. J. Schalij, A. A. Ramkisoensing, J. van Tuyn, A. A.F. de Vries, A. van der Laarse, D. L. Ypey, and D. E. Atsma
Forced Alignment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Undergoing Cardiomyogenic Differentiation Affects Functional Integration With Cardiomyocyte Cultures
Circ. Res., July 18, 2008; 103(2): 167 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
116/18/2018    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.712935v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pijnappels, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schalij, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pijnappels, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schalij, M. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
Medline Plus Health Information
*Scars
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Cell biology/structural biology
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Gene therapy