Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;116:2012-2017
Published online before print October 15, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727081
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
116/18/2012    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727081v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roshanali, F.
Right arrow Articles by Amouzadeh, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roshanali, F.
Right arrow Articles by Amouzadeh, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2007;116:2012-2017.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology

Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation via Atrial Electromechanical Interval After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Farideh Roshanali, MD; Mohammad Hossein Mandegar, MD; Mohammad Ali Yousefnia, MD; Hussein Rayatzadeh, MD; Farshid Alaeddini, MD, PhD; Farshad Amouzadeh, MA

From the Day General Hospital (F.R., M.A.Y., F. Alaeddini, F. Amouzadeh) and Shariati Hospital (M.H.M., H.R.), Tehran, Iran.

Correspondence to Farideh Roshanali, MD, Day General Hospital, Vali Asr Ave, Tehran, Iran. E-mail farideh_roshanali{at}yahoo.com

Received May 20, 2007; accepted August 31, 2007.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— We assessed the validity of the atrial electromechanical interval, measured by transthoracic tissue Doppler echocardiography, in determining patients at risk of post–coronary artery bypass graft atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods and Results— This prospective study recruited 355 patients in sinus rhythm who were candidates for coronary artery bypass grafting. The patients underwent a preoperative transthoracic echocardiography with a tissue Doppler evaluation and were monitored with continuous ECG telemetry during their hospital stay. Sixty-eight patients had postoperative AF (19.2%), with the incident occurring 2.3±0.7 days after surgery. The median length of hospitalization was 7.0 days for the AF patients and 6.0 days for the non-AF patients (P<0.0001). The subjects with postoperative AF differed from the sinus rhythm patients in that the former had a lower ejection fraction (40.4±8.5% versus 48.4±9.4%), a reduced maximal A-wave transmitral Doppler flow velocity (44.3±4.6 versus 53.3±10.9 cm/s), an increased total atrial volume (68.7±12.6 versus 55.3±11.8 mL), and a prolonged atrial electromechanical interval (141.9±13.4 versus 100.3±10.3 ms, respectively; P<0.0001 for all). In addition, the AF patients were older than the sinus rhythm group (66.0±8.0 versus 59.8±8.5 years). The atrial electromechanical interval was the best independent discriminator of the history of AF. We defined a cutoff point for the atrial electromechanical interval and chose 120 milliseconds for categorization, which yielded 100% sensitivity and 94.8% specificity for the prediction of AF.

Conclusions— The atrial electromechanical interval by transthoracic tissue Doppler echocardiography could be a valuable method for identifying patients vulnerable to post–coronary artery bypass graft AF.


Key Words: arrhythmia • fibrillation • grafting • sensitivity • specificity


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), with a rate of occurrence of 17% to 33% in different studies.1 Patients undergoing CABG and combined valve surgery have a higher incidence of postoperative AF than do patients having CABG alone.2,3 The peak of AF incidence occurs between 2 and 4 days after operation, with <10% happening on the first postoperative day.4

Clinical Perspective p 2017

AF after CABG is self-limiting in most cases, but even when it is uncomplicated, it requires additional medical treatment and a prolonged hospital stay and has the concomitant extra costs of operative treatment.3–5 Post-CABG AF is known to be a potential risk of systemic thromboembolism, hemodynamic compromise, and even stroke2,6; therefore, it is advisable that prophylactic therapy with amiodarone or atrial pacing be administered to decrease its incidence.7,8 However, prophylactic treatment to prevent AF with intravenous amiodarone is not cost-effective if given to all patients.9 In addition, such treatments may have unfavorable side effects. On balance, the fact that the prophylaxis of the whole patient population undergoing CABG is not reasonable renders the identification of at-risk patients of post-CABG AF very helpful.

To that end, several studies have used different ECG and echocardiographic parameters (eg, P-wave duration and left atrial [LA] volume). They all, however, have limitations.1 Using M-mode Doppler tissue, Omi and colleagues10 have recently evaluated the ability of the atrial electromechanical coupling to detect atrial impairment in paroxysmal AF. They found that the time intervals from the onset of the P wave to the beginning of the backward motion of the mitral and tricuspid were prolonged in paroxysmal AF.

In light of the above-mentioned studies, we hypothesized that the atrial electromechanical interval (AEMI) as a measure of atrial impairment could be helpful in detecting patients facing the risk of post-CABG AF. Thus, this study sought to assess the validity of an echocardiographic index, namely the AEMI, in predicting post-CABG AF.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patient Population
This prospective study recruited 587 consecutive patients who underwent CABG at the Day General Hospital (Tehran, Iran) between February 2005 and December 2005. The inclusion criteria were (1) the presence of significant coronary artery disease with an indication for CABG, (2) no need for associated surgery, (3) the absence of rhythm other than normal sinus rhythm, (4) the absence of a history of AF, (5) acceptable echocardiography image quality, and (6) the absence of valvular heart disease. In total, 365 patients met these criteria and were included in the study. Six patients died in hospital, and 4 patients had to undergo another surgical operation in the operating room; they were excluded from the study. Informed written consent was obtained from all patients, and the study protocol was approved by our institutional Ethics Committee on Human Study.

ECG Assessment
Until the day of discharge, all the patients were monitored with continuous ECG telemetry and had a standard 12-lead ECG recorded every day. AF was defined as AF requiring treatment and lasting >5 minutes. Brief isolated nonsustained episodes of AF were excluded. In the cardiovascular intensive care unit, automated detection of AF was obtained via the bedside arrhythmia monitor Solar 9500 (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis). The diagnosis was confirmed by the cardiovascular intensive care unit physician, who also initiated treatment as appropriate. In the step-down units, AF was detected by means of continuous ECG telemetry monitoring (Eagle 4000, GE/Marquette Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis). The diagnosis of each patient was confirmed by a cardiologist, who led this project. In addition, the cardiologist who made the diagnosis of AF had no information about the AEMI and other parameters. The well-known difficulties in defining the P-wave onset and offset may restrict the accuracy and reproducibility of the measurements. Some of these restrictions are overcome via a computer-based ECG system.

The 30-second ECG signals were acquired and stored on the hardware of the data acquisition system. The ECG waves were then displayed on the computer screen, with the waves enlarged 2 to 4 times and paper speed increased to 50 to 100 mm/s.

Echocardiography
All patients underwent a preoperative transthoracic echocardiography with a tissue Doppler imaging analysis (GE Medical System, Vivid 7, Horton, Norway) during the week leading up to surgery. Tissue Doppler imaging is a relatively new technology that allows direct noninvasive measurements of myocardial velocities and displacement. A single experienced investigator took the recordings.

The left ventricular dimensions and wall thickness were determined in the parasternal long-axis view with the M-mode cursor positioned just beyond the mitral leaflet tips perpendicular to the long axis of the ventricle according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography. LA volume was determined by tracing the endocardium from the 4-chamber view at the maximal atrial dimension. The left ventricular ejection fraction by 2-dimensional echocardiography was obtained via a modified biplane Simpson method from the apical 4- and 2-chamber views.

From the transmitral Doppler spectra of 5 consecutive cardiac cycles, average values were calculated for late atrial filling velocity (A wave). Myocardial velocities obtained with tissue Doppler were recorded using a standard pulsed-wave Doppler technique with the sample volume placed at the junction of the left ventricle lateral wall with the mitral lateral annulus from the 4-chamber view. Peak velocities during the atrial systole (Am) also were measured, the final value representing the average of at least 5 cardiac cycles. The AEMI was measured in milliseconds as time intervals from the onset of the P wave to the beginning of the atrial systole (Am) at the lateral side of the left atrium (left side) (Figures 1 and 2Down).


Figure 1187019
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. The AEMI was measured as time intervals from the onset of the P wave to the beginning of the atrial systole at the lateral side of the LA (left side). RV indicates right ventricle; LV, left ventricle; and RA, right atrium.


Figure 2187019
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Four-chamber view. The sample volume was placed at the junction of the left ventricle lateral wall with the mitral lateral annulus.

Operative Technique
A median sternotomy was performed in all the patients. Standard cardiopulmonary bypass was established by ascending aortic cannulation and with a single 2-stage venous cannulation of the right atrium. Myocardial protection was achieved by antegrade intermittent warm blood cardioplegia every 15 minutes. All the patients received total revascularization.

Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SD, percent, and total number when necessary. Comparisons were made between the continuous variables by a t test and between the categorical variables by a {chi}2 test. A multiple logistic regression was applied to evaluate the independent risk factors for AF. All the independent variables (ie, both significant and nonsignificant variables in the single-variable analysis) were included in the models using a backward selection method. A value of P>0.1 was used to reject variables from the model. The R2 was used to assess the goodness of fit of the models. A value of P<0.1 was applied to select variables in the model. The best cutoff point for the AEMI to predict the possibility of postoperative AF was defined via a receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis. The statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS software package, version 13.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Of a total of 355 patients, 68 patients (19.2%) had postoperative AF, with the incident happening 2.3±0.7 days after surgery. Sinus rhythm was restored in all patients with antiarrhythmic medical therapy. The median length of hospitalization was 7.0 days for the AF patients and 6.0 days for the non-AF patients (P<0.0001). The demographic data, clinical variables, and drugs are shown in Table 1. The preoperative echocardiographic parameters are listed in Table 2. The inclusion of all the variables (both significant and nonsignificant) in Tables 1 and 2Down in the multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that AF correlated only with sex, A wave, AEMI, and cardiopulmonary bypass time (Table 3). The R2 was equal to 0.58. The receiver-operating characteristics curve of the 3 continuous variables is shown in Figure 3; the area under the curve was 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.98 to 1.00) for the increase in AEMI, 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.72) for the increase in cardiopulmonary bypass time, and 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.81) for the decrease in A wave.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Demographic Data, Clinical Variables, and Drugs for Patients With and Without AF


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Preoperative Echocardiographic Parameters for Patients With and Without AF


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of the Risk of AF


Figure 3187019
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Receiver operating characteristic for 3 variables (AEMI, CPB, and A wave).

Receiver-operating characteristics curve for 3 variables: AEMI, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and A wave.

Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the AEMI not only was significant even in the presence of the other variables but also was strongly predictive of the occurrence of AF and that the area under the curve was the best. Our analysis to define a cutoff point for the AEMI (Figure 4) advised the use of 120 ms for categorization, which yielded 100% sensitivity, 94.8% specificity, 81.9% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value for the prediction of postoperative AF. We opted for the cutoff point of 120 ms because we did not want to miss any patient with a possibility of developing postoperative AF, even at the cost of including some patients who did not face the risk of developing this postoperative complication.


Figure 4187019
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Analysis for the identification of a good cutoff point for the prediction of post-CABG AF by AEMI. Sen indicates sensitivity; SP, specificity.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
M-mode Doppler tissue echocardiography enabled us to evaluate the validity of the AEMI as a predictor of post-CABG AF. This user-friendly index, which is inexpensive and accessible, showed that patients with a larger AEMI were prone to develop AF rather than remain in sinus rhythm after CABG.

Preventing the onset of AF in lieu of treating its complications is of great significance from the standpoint of public health. Postoperative intravenous amiodarone, followed by oral amiodarone, appears to be effective in the prevention of new-onset postoperative AF. It also reduces the ventricular rate and duration of AF after CABG.11 Despite these benefits, amiodarone has some serious side effects12 that limit its application, hence the necessity to administer amiodarone only to patients at high risk of post-CABG AF. Nonetheless, identifying such patients at whom a prophylactic measure (including amiodarone, β-blockers, and atrial pacing) for preventing AF could be targeted remains a challenge for modern heart surgery.

To date, several demographic and preoperative factors such as age, sex, history of previous AF, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diseased right coronary artery, and use or withdrawal of medication have been shown to be risk factors for postoperative AF. Unfortunately, none of these factors is powerful enough to predict postoperative AF after CABG to any clinically meaningful extent.1 On the other hand, several echocardiographic approaches to nonrheumatic AF have been previously reported,13–16 but one must not lose sight of the fact that conventional echocardiographic parameters have their own limitations. The LA volume has an independent predictive value for determining the risk of AF. Nevertheless, several studies have reported that the LA dimensions in patients with paroxysmal AF are not necessarily larger than those in control subjects.17,18 Furthermore, the relationship between the LA chamber size estimated by echocardiography and lone paroxysmal AF is controversial. Echocardiographic LA chamber size usually is measured as a short-axis dimension in the parasternal and apical views, but this method possibly is insensitive in the detection of LA enlargement.19 Transmitral flow velocity during early diastolic filling (E), atrial contraction (A), and E/A ratio are affected in paroxysmal AF.20 Decreased A velocity is correlated with reduced atrial contraction.21 Decreased E/A ratio is related mainly to left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and not directly to atrial impairment.22 Both parameters are less sensitive and less specific because they are influenced by such cardiac conditions as heart rate, preload, and afterload.23

There has been a search for new predictors based on new technology to analyze ECG or to measure heart rate variability.1 Of these predictors, the prolongation of P-wave duration in signal-averaged ECG looks the most promising. According to the existing literature, the sensitivity of the signal-averaged P-wave duration in identifying patients developing AF postoperatively is 68% to 86%, and the specificity ranges from 39% to 88%. Moreover, the positive predictive and negative predictive values vary from 34% to 76% and from 83% to 85%, respectively.24–29 Obviously, the fact that sensitivity and the negative predictive value are high but specificity and the positive predictive value remain quite low limits its usefulness in clinical practice. On the other hand, even a detailed analysis of a standard 12-lead ECG has failed to provide useful information for risk stratification. An analysis of lead II P-wave duration and P-terminal force in a standard ECG has been reported to show no significant difference in any of these variables between AF patients and non-AF patients after CABG.27,29 Changes in heart rate variability before postoperative AF have already been documented, yet Hakala and coworkers30 showed that a short-term preoperative analysis of heart rate variability under standardized physiological conditions could not reliably identify patients at high risk of AF after CABG.

Benedetto and coworkers31 showed a correlation between preoperative LA dysfunction assessed by tissue Doppler and postoperative AF after CABG. They explained that a peak atrial systolic mitral annular tissue Doppler velocity of ≤9 cm/s (P=0.03; odds ratio, 1.8) was independently related to the incidence of postoperative AF.

As mentioned earlier, in the present study, a prolonged AEMI was detected in patients who showed post-CABG AF compared with those who remained in sinus rhythm after CABG (141.9±13.4 versus 100.3±10.3 ms, respectively; P<0.0001). Our data support a previous comprehensive study by Omi and colleagues,10 who evaluated the AEMI via M-mode Doppler tissue to test its clinical feasibility for detecting atrial abnormalities in paroxysmal AF. Using Doppler tissue, Omi and associates measured the time intervals from the onset of the P wave until the backward motions of the right (R-PC) and left (L-PC) atrioventricular rings in the apical 4-chamber view corresponding to the atrial contractions. They demonstrated that both R-PC and L-PC intervals in the paroxysmal AF group were significantly longer than those in the control group (74±11 versus 61±11 ms, P<0.005; and 120±15 versus 90±11 ms, P<0.0001, respectively). Using the criterion of L-PC interval >112 ms as an atrial impairment of paroxysmal AF yielded sensitivity, specificity, and a positive predictive value of 73%, 93%, and 93%; using an L-PC interval >104 ms (the value with the largest sum of sensitivity and specificity) yielded values of 87%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. Omi and colleagues also showed that L-PC interval was correlated positively with the LA long-axis dimension (r=0.499, P<0.005) and filtered P-wave duration (r=0.735, P<0.0001) but not with the short-axis dimension (r=0.264, P=0.159). These data support the notion that L-PC interval is determined by the atrial electric conduction disturbance and LA enlargement.

Surprisingly, some of the demographic factors that have been reported as predictors of post-CABG AF can increase fibrosis and lead to consequent atrial refractoriness and conduction delay. Because the prolongation of the AEMI can be explained not only by LA enlargement but also by increased time delay from electric activation in the atrium to atrial myocardial contraction,3 the AEMI can totally and significantly reflect the atrial impairment and predict post-CABG AF. In the present study, the patients who showed post-CABG AF were older than patients in sinus rhythm (66.0±8.0 versus 59.8±8.5 years). Aging causes cardiac dilatation, myocardial atrophy, decreased conduction tissue, and fibrosis in the atria.32,33 These age-related changes may partially affect the AEMI and may be responsible for an increased risk of AF after CABG. Likewise, hypertension has been shown to predict postoperative AF; it may be related to increased fibrosis and to the dispersion of atrial refractoriness, both of which influence the AEMI.

The results of our study are in line with those of some previous studies showing that the AEMI was a useful parameter for detecting atrial impairment. Therefore, the AEMI can be used as a reliable index to determine patients at high risk of post-CABG AF, with a larger AEMI denoting a higher probability of post-CABG AF. Consequently, effective prophylactic measures can be targeted only at patients with a prolonged AEMI.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Hakala T, Hedman A. Predicting the risk of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2003; 37: 309–315.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Creswell LL, Schuessler RB, Rosenbloom M, Cox JL. Hazards of postoperative atrial arrhythmias. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993; 56: 539–549.[Abstract]
  3. Creswell LL, Damiano RJ. Postoperative atrial fibrillation: an old problem crying for new solutions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001; 121: 638–641.[Free Full Text]
  4. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, Rizzo RJ, Couper GS, VanderVliet M, Collins JJ Jr, Cohn LH, Burstin HR. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery: current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation. 1996; 94: 390–397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Borzak S, Tisdale JE, Amin NB, Goldberg AD, Frank D, Padhi ID, Higgins RS. Atrial fibrillation after bypass surgery: does the arrhythmia or the characteristics of the patients prolong hospital stay? Chest. 1998; 113: 1489–1491.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Hravnak M, Hoffman LA, Saul MI, Zullo TG, Whitman GR, Griffith BP. Predictors and impact of atrial fibrillation after isolated coronary bypass grafting. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30: 330–337.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Daoud EG, Strickberger SA, Man KC, Goyal R, Deeb GM, Bolling SF, Pagani FD, Bitar C, Meissner MD, Morady F. Preoperative amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after heart surgery. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337: 1785–1791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Guarnieri T, Nolan S, Gottlieb SO, Dudek A, Lowry DR. Intravenous amiodarone for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery: the Amiodarone Reduction in Coronary Heart (ARCH) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 343–347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Mahoney EM, Thompson TD, Veledar E, Williams J, Weintraub WS. Cost-effectiveness of targeting patients undergoing cardiac surgery for therapy with intravenous amiodarone to prevent atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40: 737–745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Omi W, Nagai H, Takamura M, Okura S, Okajima M, Furusho H, Maruyama M, Sakagami S, Takata S, Kaneko S. Doppler tissue analysis of atrial electromechanical coupling in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18: 39–44.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Yagdi T, Nalbantgil S, Ayik F, Apaydin A, Islamoglu F, Posacioglu H, Calkavur T, Atay Y, Buket S. Amiodarone reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 125: 1420–1425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Jafari-Fesharaki M, Scheinman MM. Adverse effects of amiodarone. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998; 21: 108–120.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Henry WL, Morganroth J, Pearlman AS, Clark CE, Redwood DR, Itscoitz SB, Epstein SE. Relation between echocardiographically determined left atrial size and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1976; 53: 273–279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Vaziri SM, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Echocardiographic predictors of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1994; 89: 724–730.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Psaty BM, Manolio TA, Kuller LH, Kronmal RA, Cushman M, Fried LP, White R, Furberg CD, Rautaharju PM. Incidence of and risk factors for atrial fibrillation in older adults. Circulation. 1997; 96: 2455–2461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Bailey KR, Leibson CL, Montgomery SC, Takemoto Y, Diamond PM, Marra MA, Gersh BJ, Wiebers DO, Petty GW, Seward JB. Left atrial volume: important risk marker of incident atrial fibrillation in 1655 older men and women. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001; 76: 467–475.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Takahashi N, Imataka K, Seki A, Fujii J. Left atrial enlargement in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Jpn Heart J. 1982; 23: 677–683.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Rostagno C, Olivo G, Comeglio M, Bertini G, Gensini GF, Galanti G. Left atrial size changes in patients with paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation: an echocardiographic follow-up. Angiology. 1996; 47: 797–801.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Loperfido F, Pennestri F, Digaetano A, Scabbia E, Santarelli P, Mongiardo R, Schiavoni G, Coppola E, Manzoli U. Assessment of left atrial dimensions by cross sectional echocardiography in patients with mitral valve disease. Br Heart J. 1983; 50: 570–578.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Asinger RW. Role of transthoracic echocardiography in atrial fibrillation. Echocardiography. 2000; 17: 357–364.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Barbier P, Alioto G, Guazzi MD. Left atrial function and ventricular filling in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24: 165–170.[Abstract]
  22. Thamilarasan M, Grimm RA, Rodriguez LL, Sun JP, Odabashian JA, Agler DA, Morehead A, Chung MK, Klein AL, Thomas JD. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in lone atrial fibrillation determined by Doppler tissue imaging of mitral annular motion. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86: 1026–1029.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Nishimura RA, Abel MD, Hatle LK, Tajik AJ. Assessment of diastolic function of the heart: background and current applications of Doppler echocardiography, part II: clinical studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 1989; 64: 181–204.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Steinberg JS, Zelenkofske S, Wong SC, Gelernt M, Sciacca R, Menchavez E. Value of the P-wave signal-averaged ECG for predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1993; 88: 2618–2622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Klein M, Evans SJ, Blumberg S, Cataldo L, Bodenheimer MM. Use of P-wave-triggered, P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiogram to predict atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery Am Heart J. 1995; 129: 895–901.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Zaman AG, Alamgir F, Richens T, Williams R, Rothman MT, Mills PG. The role of signal averaged P wave duration and serum magnesium as a combined predictor of atrial fibrillation after elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart. 1997; 77: 527–531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Stafford PJ, Kolvekar S, Cooper J, Fothergill J, Schlindwein F, deBono DP, Spyt TJ, Garratt CJ. Signal averaged P wave compared with standard electrocardiography or echocardiography for prediction of atrial fibrillation after coronary bypass grafting. Heart. 1997; 77: 417–422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Aytemir K, Aksoyek S, Ozer N, Aslamaci S, Oto A. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: P wave signal averaged ECG, clinical and angiographic variables in risk assessment. Int J Cardiol. 1999; 69: 49–56.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Caravelli P, De Carlo M, Musumeci G, Tartarini G, Gherarducci G, Bortolotti U, Mariani MA, Mariani M. P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiogram predicts atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2002; 7: 198–203.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Hakala T, Vanninen E, Hedman A, Hippeläinen M. Analysis of heart rate variability does not identify the patients at risk of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2002; 36: 167–171.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Benedetto U, Melina G, Roscitano A, Ciavarella GM, Tonelli E, Sinatra R. Clinical utility of tissue Doppler imaging in prediction of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 83: 83–88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Lie JT, Hammond PI. Pathology of the senescent heart: anatomic observations on 237 autopsy studies of patients 90 to 105 years old. Mayo Clin Proc. 1988; 63: 552–564.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Kitzman DW, Edwards WD. Age-related changes in the anatomy of the normal human heart. J Gerontol. 1990; 45: M33–M39.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Postoperative atrial fibrillation, one of the most common complications of coronary artery bypass grafting, is associated with prolonged hospital stay. Prophylactic therapies with medications such as amiodarone and β-blockers have been advocated but have risks. Identifying patients at high risk for atrial fibrillation is therefore of interest. The atrial electromechanical interval, measured from the onset of the P wave to echocardiographic detection of left atrial motion, reflects atrial conduction and contraction timing. We prospectively assessed whether the preoperative atrial electromechanical interval predicts postoperative atrial fibrillation. An atrial electromechanical interval of >120 ms was very sensitive (100%) and specific (94.8%) for identifying at-risk patients. These findings suggest that prophylactic therapy for atrial fibrillation can be specifically targeted to high-risk patients and that use of atrial electromechanical interval should be considered for trials of prophylactic therapy.


Related Article:

Issue Highlights
Circulation 2007 116: 1997. [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. A. Groh, O. A. Binns, H. G. Burton III, G. L. Champsaur, S. W. Ely, and A. M. Johnson
Epicardial Ultrasonic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation During Concomitant Cardiac Surgery Is a Valid Option in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease
Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14_suppl_1): S78 - S82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
116/18/2012    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727081v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roshanali, F.
Right arrow Articles by Amouzadeh, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roshanali, F.
Right arrow Articles by Amouzadeh, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease
Right arrowRelated Article