doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.642280
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2007;115:840-845.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Cardiovascular Disease in Women |
Hormone Therapy and Venous Thromboembolism Among Postmenopausal Women
Impact of the Route of Estrogen Administration and Progestogens: The ESTHER Study
From Inserm Unit 780, Cardiovascular Epidemiology Section, Villejuif (M.C., E.O., G.P.-B., P.-Y.S.); Université Paris-Sud 11, Villejuif (M.C., E.O., P.-Y.S.); Département de Médecine Interne, GETBO, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest (E.O.); Université Paris 5 Réné Descartes, Service d’Hématologie Biologique, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Paris (G.P.-B., J.C.); Université Paris-Descartes, Faculté de Médecine; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris (G.M.); Département de Médecine Interne, CHU Rouen, Rouen (H.L.); Institut d’Hématologie-Transfusion, CHUR, Lille (N.T.); Service d’Explorations Fonctionnelles, CHU Côte de Nacre, Caen (M.-T.B.); Unité de Médecine Interne Thrombose Maladies Vasculaires, CHU Nancy, Hôpital de Brabois, and INSERM U734, Faculté de Médecine de Nancy-Université Henri Poincaré, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy (D.W.); and Université Paris Descartes, Inserm U428 and Service de Médecine Vasculaire-HTA, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris (J.E.), France.
Correspondence to P.Y. Scarabin, Inserm Unit 780, Cardiovascular Epidemiology Section, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94807 Villejuif Cedex, France. E-mail scarabin{at}vjf.inserm.fr
Received May 26, 2006; accepted November 8, 2006.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background— Oral estrogen therapy increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in postmenopausal women. Transdermal estrogen may be safer. However, currently available data have limited the ability to investigate the wide variety of types of progestogen.
Methods and Results— We performed a multicenter case–control study of VTE among postmenopausal women 45 to 70 years of age between 1999 and 2005 in France. We recruited 271 consecutive cases with a first documented episode of idiopathic VTE (208 hospital cases, 63 outpatient cases) and 610 controls (426 hospital controls, 184 community controls) matched for center, age, and admission date. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, odds ratios (ORs) for VTE in current users of oral and transdermal estrogen compared with nonusers were 4.2 (95% CI, 1.5 to 11.6) and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.4 to 2.1), respectively. There was no significant association of VTE with micronized progesterone and pregnane derivatives (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.9 and OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.3, respectively). In contrast, norpregnane derivatives were associated with a 4-fold-increased VTE risk (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 10.0).
Conclusions— Oral but not transdermal estrogen is associated with an increased VTE risk. In addition, our data suggest that norpregnane derivatives may be thrombogenic, whereas micronized progesterone and pregnane derivatives appear safe with respect to thrombotic risk. If confirmed, these findings could benefit women in the management of their menopausal symptoms with respect to the VTE risk associated with oral estrogen and use of progestogens.
Key Words: embolism • epidemiology • estrogens • progestogens • thrombosis
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Since the publication of the Women Health Initiative (WHI) results,1 medical practices of hormone therapy have been dramatically altered.2 Despite a striking decrease in hormone therapy use, many women remain eligible for this treatment to correct postmenopausal climacteric symptoms and to prevent osteoporosis. Cardiovascular disease, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), is an important determinant of the benefit-to-risk profile of hormone therapy.3 Both observational studies4–13 and clinical trials1,14,15 have shown a significant increase in VTE risk among postmenopausal women using hormone therapy. However, most of these studies were done in women using preferentially oral estrogen alone or combined with a specific pregnane derivative (medroxyprogesterone acetate), and these results are not necessary relevant to other hormone regimens. In European countries, especially in France, the transdermal route of estrogen administration is used most often. In addition, many progestogen derivatives are available, and the impact of the different types of progestogens on the VTE risk has not been investigated. Therefore, we designed the Estrogen and Thromboembolism Risk (ESTHER) study, a multicenter case–control study performed in France, to investigate the impact of the route of estrogen administration on VTE risk among postmenopausal women. Early results of our study have shown that oral but not transdermal estrogen increases VTE risk.11 Final analysis of the ESTHER study, based on a more important pool of cases and controls, focuses on the impact of the progestogens on VTE risk.
Editorial p 820
Clinical Perspective p 845
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The ESTHER study is a multicenter case–control study. It was done in France in 8 hospitals and in the general population between 1999 and 2006. Details of the study design have been described.11,16
Selection of Cases and Controls
We included consecutively 208 hospital cases with a first documented episode of idiopathic VTE and 426 hospital controls. Controls had to have been admitted to the hospital with an a priori diagnosis unrelated to estrogen use. These diagnoses included diseases of eye, ear, skin, respiratory and alimentary tracts, bones and joints, and kidneys; infectious diseases; and diabetes. In addition, we included consecutively 63 outpatient cases from 3 hematology centers matched with 184 community controls selected at random from electoral rolls. About 5% of hospital controls and 10% of community controls refused to participate in this study. Cases and controls were matched for center, 2-year age band, admission date, and area of residence. Each case was matched with 1 to 3 controls.
Both hospital and outpatient cases were excluded if they reported a personal history of VTE, had a contraindication for hormone therapy (breast cancer, endometrial cancer, and cardiovascular disease), or had a predisposing factor for VTE (history within the previous month of surgical intervention, trauma with immobilization for >8 days, illness necessitating bed rest for >8 days, known cancer, systemic inflammatory disease). Outpatient cases also were excluded if they were referred to clinical centers for estrogen advice or known thrombophilia.16 Controls were subjected to the same exclusion criteria as cases.
Ascertainment of Cases
Clinical events had to be diagnosed with an imaging procedure. Pulmonary embolism was defined as the presence of either helicoidal computed tomography showing at least 1 intraluminal defect in 1 segmental pulmonary artery, high-probability ventilation/perfusion scan according to criteria from the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis,17 or pulmonary angiography showing a clot. Deep venous thrombosis was diagnosed by use of compression ultrasonography. Events were adjudicated within each center but also centrally for outpatient cases. Events were validated by investigators blinded to estrogen use.
Data Collection
Cases and controls were identified without knowledge of estrogen use, and they were interviewed at hospital in a standard way with the same questionnaire. Menopause was defined by amenorrhea for >12 months or bilateral ovariectomy or hysterectomy together with an age >52 years. Women were classified as current users if they used estrogen at any time in the past 3 months before the case admission date. Similarly, current smokers were women who had smoked during the 3 months before inclusion. Varicose veins were defined as a reported history of varicose veins or stripping. Familial history of VTE was defined as the occurrence of VTE before 65 years of age in a first degree-relative. Overweight and obesity were defined as body mass index >25 and 30 kg/m2, respectively.
The protocol was approved by Inserm and the local ethics committee. Written and informed consent was obtained from all women.
Classification of Hormone Therapy
Identification of hormone therapy was assisted by showing the participants pictures of both available estrogens and progestogens. The questionnaire included details of type, dose, and duration of treatment.
Current users of hormone therapy were classified according to both the route of estrogen administration and the type of progestogens. First, treated women were classified as either oral estrogen users or transdermal estrogen (patch or gel) users. Second, current users of hormone therapy also were categorized according to the progestogen North American Menopause Society classification.18 Women were classified as users of micronized progesterone or pregnane derivatives, norpregnane derivatives, or nortestosterone derivatives. Pregnane derivatives included dydrogesterone or medrogestone, chlormadinone acetate, cyproterone acetate, or medroxyprogesterone acetate. Norpregnane derivatives included either nomegestrol acetate or promegestone.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous data are expressed as mean and SD; categorical variables are given as absolute values and percentages.
We estimated the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs from conditional logistic regressions. Data were analyzed by classifying the cases and controls according to hormone therapy. Current users were compared with nonusers in a joint model of both route of estrogen administration (either oral or transdermal) and type of progestogens (either micronized progesterone or pregnane or norpregnane derivatives). We excluded the users of oral estrogen combined with nortestosterone derivatives (12 cases, 7 controls), and VTE odds ratio associated with this type of hormone therapy was estimated separately with nonusers as the reference group. ORs were adjusted for obesity status, familial history of VTE, and varicose veins (adjustment 1) and further adjusted for education, age at menopause, hysterectomy, and cigarette smoking (adjustment 2). Interactions between estrogens and progestogens effect were tested by using a multiplicative OR model. Stratified analyses were done to investigate the impact of estrogen dose and duration of treatment on the main findings. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS statistical software (version 8.2, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).
P.-Y.S. had full access to and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
General characteristics of cases and controls are given in Table 1. As expected, the mean age of cases and controls was similar. Mean body mass index and age at menopause were significantly higher among cases than controls. Cases were more likely than controls to have reported familial history of VTE and varicose veins. No significant differences in current smoking, education level, type of menopause, and hysterectomy were found between cases and controls. There was no association between past use of estrogen and VTE risk (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.7). In addition, because recency of treatment was not associated with VTE risk, past users and never users were pooled as nonusers.
|
Overall, 26.0% of cases and 29.9% of controls used transdermal estrogen therapy (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.1), and 17.4% of cases and 6.5% of controls were treated by oral estrogen therapy (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.4 to 11.4) (Table 2). Adjustment for potential confounding factors made little changes to the results. Most current users of estrogen therapy received 17ß-estradiol. No controls and only 2 cases used conjugated equine estrogens. The most common dose for transdermal estrogen use was 
50 µg/d. Approximately 15% of transdermal estrogen users received preparations delivering >50 µg/d. In current users of oral estrogen therapy, the mean dose of estradiol was 1.5 mg/d, ranging from 0.5 to 2 mg daily.
|
Table 2 gives the VTE OR associated with the types of progestogen after exclusion of 12 cases and 7 controls who used oral estrogen combined with nortestosterone derivatives (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 2.1 to 21.9). There was no significant interaction between estrogens by route of administration and progestogens. Overall, only 5.4% of cases and 6.7% of controls were treated by estrogen alone. Micronized progesterone was used by 7.4% of cases and 10.4% of controls (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.0). Mean dose of micronized progesterone was 100 mg/d. Pregnanes were used by 15.1% of cases and 13.1% of controls (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.4). Pregnane derivatives included dydrogesterone, medrogestone, chlormadinone acetate, cyproterone acetate, and medroxyprogesterone acetate. Finally, norpregnane derivatives, either nomegestrol acetate or promegestone, were used by 15.5% of cases and 6.1% of controls. Twenty-two cases received nomegestrol acetate; 18 received promegestone. The usual daily dose of nomegestrol acetate was 5 mg and of promegestone was 0.250 mg. The risk of VTE increased significantly (>3 times) among users of norpregnane derivatives compared with nonusers (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 10.2). In addition, ORs of VTE in current users of nomegestrol acetate and current users of promegestone were similar and significantly differed from 1 (data not shown).
To ensure that our findings were not influenced by estrogen dose and time of hormone exposure, stratified analyses were done. Using the median of the distribution of exposure time (5 years) as a cutoff point, we obtained consistent results in the corresponding subgroups. When the analysis was restricted to women using the more common doses of estrogens (50 µg/d for transdermal estrogen and 1.5 mg/d for oral estrogen), risk estimates were similar to those observed in the whole population.
With regard to the potential determinants of the route of estrogen administration and type of progestogens, transdermal estrogen users were older and used estrogen longer than oral estrogen users. There was no significant difference in other characteristics between oral and transdermal estrogen users. No significant correlates of type of progestogens were found, except for the estrogen dose. The proportion of women using high- or low-dose estrogen was lower in the pregnane subgroup without any change in the mean dosage.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Our data confirm that oral but not transdermal estrogen increases VTE risk among postmenopausal women. In addition, these data show that micronized progesterone and pregnane derivatives may be safe with respect to thrombotic risk. Furthermore, our results suggest that norpregnane derivatives are thrombogenic.
Progestagen is added to estrogen therapy among postmenopausal women with an intact uterus to prevent the elevated risk of estrogen-induced endometrial hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma. Unlike medical practices in the United States where medroxyprogesterone acetate is the almost exclusively prescribed progestogen among postmenopausal women, a wide variety of progestogens is used in European countries, especially in France. Progestogens include both progesterone and synthetic progestins derived from progesterone (pregnanes and 19-norpregnanes) or from testosterone (19-nortestosterones). Progestins have different pharmacological properties depending on the parent molecule from which they are derived. Very small structural changes in the parent molecule may induce considerable differences in the progestin activity.19 The effects of progestins are related to interactions not only with progesterone receptors but also with other steroid hormone receptors. Norpregnane derivatives, including nomegestrol acetate and promegestone, appear to have a very high progestational activity, and unlike nortestosterone derivatives, they do not possess androgenic, estrogenic, or glucocorticoid activity.20 Norpregnane derivatives bind almost exclusively to the progesterone receptor and do not interfere with the other steroid receptors. Their affinity for the progesterone receptor is higher than the progesterone one. In addition, these progestins have both antiestrogenic and antigonadotropic actions.21,22 Therefore, in some countries, including France, norpregnane derivatives often are used in premenopausal women with hyperestrogenic symptoms such as mastodynia and/or benign breast disease, as well as in hormone-treated postmenopausal women with intolerance to exogenous estrogen.21,23
Data on the impact of progestogens by the route of estrogen administration on VTE risk among postmenopausal women are scarce. Previous studies reported estimates of VTE risk among users of transdermal estrogen,4,8,10 but the results were based on a few cases who used transdermal estrogen, and each study was inconclusive. Pooling all these data, along with the results of the ESTHER study, gives an overall VTE risk close to 1 (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.9) among current users of transdermal estrogen compared with nonusers.24 With regard to the impact of progestogens, Smith et al12 have compared the VTE risk among users of different estrogen types with or without progestogen and among nonusers. The results have shown that concomitant progestogen use was associated with an increased VTE risk compared with the use of estrogen alone. However, women received oral estrogen alone or combined exclusively with medroxyprogesterone acetate, and none used transdermal estrogen. Recently, Douketis et al13 have studied the differential VTE risk in users of opposed estrogen by route of estrogen administration and in users of oral estrogen alone. Data showed that the VTE risk was higher in users of opposed oral estrogen than in users of oral estrogen alone. However, the OR of VTE in relation to transdermal estrogen was not assessed. In both WHI trials, the VTE risk was studied in relation to opposed estrogen and to estrogen alone.1,15 Despite differences in the general characteristics of women included in these 2 trials, the results suggest that the use of opposed estrogen results in a higher VTE risk than the use of estrogen alone. In our study, the VTE risk estimates associated with oral estrogen are higher than those observed in these trials. However, VTE cases with predisposing factors were excluded in the ESTHER study, and only idiopathic events were assessed. In contrast, secondary VTE was analyzed in the WHI trials, and ORs for procedure-related events were lower. In addition, compliance to hormone therapy was not optimal in WHI trials, and this might have led to a substantial underestimation of the true effect of oral estrogen on VTE risk.
Progestogens are also prescribed to premenopausal women for their antigonadotrophic activity. Some data on the impact of contraceptive progestogens on VTE risk have been published.25–27 In these studies, women who received either cyproterone acetate or nortestosterone had an elevated VTE risk. However, these results are not relevant to norpregnane derivatives.
The mechanisms underlying the increased VTE risk among users of oral estrogen or transdermal estrogen combined with norpregnane derivatives include a prothrombotic state, a decreased blood flow, and/or an alteration in the vessel wall.28 Few data on the effect of progestogens by route of estrogen administration on hemostatic variables have been reported. However, we have previously reported that transdermal estrogen combined with micronized progesterone had little or no effect on blood coagulation activation as shown by the absence of significant variation in plasma concentration of prothrombin fragment 1+2.29 In addition, 2 randomized controlled trials have shown that oral but not transdermal estrogen, both combined with micronized progesterone, induced an activated protein C resistance.30,31 Thus, hemostatic data, together with the results of the ESTHER study, suggest that transdermal estrogen combined with micronized progesterone is safe with respect to VTE risk. Similarly, recent data showing that chlormadinone acetate, a pregnane derivative, has little or no effect on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis32 are consistent with the absence of increased VTE risk among postmenopausal women using transdermal estrogen combined with pregnane derivatives. With regard to the norpregnane derivatives, one randomized trial failed to show any changes in hemostatic variables among women receiving oral estrogen combined with nomegestrol acetate.33 Among women recruited from the Project Aging Women, van Baal et al34 and Post et al35 have studied the effect of trimegestone (a norpregnane derivative), dydrogesterone, or both combined with oral estrogen therapy on hemostatic variables. Deleterious effects of oral estrogen therapy on coagulation without significant differences between all progestogen subgroups were found. These results are consistent with our clinical findings about oral estrogen use but are not relevant to transdermal estrogen therapy. Thus, whether norpregnane derivatives have prothrombotic effects among postmenopausal women requires further investigation.
Elevated VTE risk among postmenopausal women using some hormone regimens also could be mediated through changes in venous structure and function.28 The occurrence of venous stasis during luteal phase or pregnancy, together with the presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the venous wall,36 suggests that venous blood flow may be directly modulated by steroid hormones. Therefore, norpregnane derivatives, which have a high progestational activity, might increase the VTE risk through venous stasis via a progesterone receptor–mediated pathway. The role of progestogens in the alteration of vessels blood flow and in the development of varicose veins warrants further study.36
One potential limitation of our study is that observational studies are subject to bias. The validity of the ESTHER study has been discussed.11,16 To minimize the effects of bias on interpretation, both cases and controls were recruited using a number of selection criteria.37 Elevated levels of VTE risk factors, including age, obesity, familial history of VTE, varicose veins, and prothrombotic mutations,16 could explain our findings related to the route of estrogen administration and progestogens. However, the proportion of women at high risk for VTE was similar across all the estrogen and progestogen subgroups. In addition, adjustment for these potential confounders and other relevant covariates38 made few changes to the results. On the other hand, stratified analyses by characteristics of hormone therapy, including estrogen dose and duration of treatment,38 showed consistent results. Another selection bias could be related to the differential prescription of progestogens according to the estrogen status of women using hormone therapy. Norpregnane derivatives are more likely to be prescribed to women with hyperestrogenic symptoms. Because there is evidence that lifetime estrogen exposure is positively related to VTE risk in postmenopausal women,39 such prescription bias could explain in part the high VTE risk among women using transdermal estrogen combined with norpregnane derivatives. Another limitation of our study is related to the small number of subjects within progestogen subgroups, especially among users of oral estrogen. Among transdermal estrogen users, the upper 95% confidence bounds for the adjusted odds ratios show that the data only rule out increases in the odds ratios of VTE >80%, 20%, and 60% for estrogen alone, estrogen combined with micronized progesterone, and estrogen combined with pregnane derivatives, respectively.
In the WHI trials, pulmonary embolism accounts for about one third of the excess incidence of potentially fatal events resulting from oral estrogen.3 Therefore, our findings may be of great clinical relevance in minimizing the VTE risk among women who require hormone therapy. Our data emphasize the importance of the route of estrogen administration and the choice of progestogen in determining of the benefit-to-risk profile of hormone therapy. The effect of transdermal estrogen combined with different progestogen types on health outcomes should be investigated in randomized trials.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Clinical centers: Département de Médecine Interne, Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, Brest (E. Oger, D. Mottier); Service d’Exploration Fonctionnelle, Centre Hospitalier de Caen (M.T. Barrellier); Unité Hémostase-Thrombose, Hôtel-Dieu, Paris (J. Conard, G. Plu-Bureau); Service de Médecine Interne et Médecine Générale, Service d’Hématologie Biologique, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Nancy (D. Wahl, T. Lecompte, E. de Maistre, M.C. Laprevote-Heully); Département de Pneumologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris (G. Meyer, M.T. Guillanneuf); Laboratoire d’Hématologie, Hôpital Cardiologique, Département de Médecine Interne, Centre Hospitalier de Rouen (H. Lévesque, N. Cailleux); and Département de Médecine Vasculaire, Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse (P. Léger, A. Elias). Coordinating center: Inserm U780 (E. Oger, G. Plu-Bureau, L. Carcaillon, M. Canonico, and P.Y. Scarabin).
Sources of Funding
The study was supported by the Fondation de France, by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), and by grants from Aventis, Besins International, Sanofi, and Servier Institute.
Disclosures
None.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002; 288: 321–333.
2. Haas JS, Kaplan CP, Gerstenberger EP, Kerlikowske K. Changes in the use of postmenopausal hormone therapy after the publication of clinical trial results. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140: 184–188.
3. Cushman M, Kuller LH, Prentice R, Rodabough RJ, Psaty BM, Stafford RS, Sidney S, Rosendaal FR. Estrogen plus progestin and risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA. 2004; 292: 1573–1580.
4. Daly E, Vessey MP, Hawkins MM, Carson JL, Gough P, Marsh S. Risk of venous thromboembolism in users of hormone replacement therapy. Lancet. 1996; 348: 977–980.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Daly E, Vessey MP, Painter R, Hawkins MM. Case–control study of venous thromboembolism risk in users of hormone replacement therapy. Lancet. 1996; 348: 1027.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Jick H, Derby LE, Myers MW, Vasilakis C, Newton KM. Risk of hospital admission for idiopathic venous thromboembolism among users of postmenopausal oestrogens. Lancet. 1996; 348: 981–983.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Goldhaber SZ, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Willett WC, Hennekens CH. Prospective study of exogenous hormones and risk of pulmonary embolism in women. Lancet. 1996; 348: 983–987.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Perez Gutthann S, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Castellsague J, Duque Oliart A. Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism: population based case–control study. BMJ. 1997; 314: 796–800.
9. Varas-Lorenzo C, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Cattaruzzi C, Troncon MG, Agostinis L, Perez-Gutthann S. Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of hospitalization for venous thromboembolism: a population-based study in southern Europe. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 147: 387–390.
10. Hoibraaten E, Abdelnoor M, Sandset PM. Hormone replacement therapy with estradiol and risk of venous thromboembolism: a population-based case–control study. Thromb Haemost. 1999; 82: 1218–1221.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Scarabin PY, Oger E, Plu-Bureau G. Differential association of oral and transdermal oestrogen-replacement therapy with venous thromboembolism risk. Lancet. 2003; 362: 428–432.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Smith NL, Heckbert SR, Lemaitre RN, Reiner AP, Lumley T, Weiss NS, Larson EB, Rosendaal FR, Psaty BM. Esterified estrogens and conjugated equine estrogens and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA. 2004; 292: 1581–1587.
13. Douketis J. Hormone replacement therapy and risk for venous thromboembolism: what’s new and how do these findings influence clinical practice? Curr Opin Hematol. 2005; 12: 395–400.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, Furberg C, Herrington D, Riggs B, Vittinghoff E. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women: Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA. 1998; 280: 605–613.
15. Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR, Bassford T, Beresford SA, Black H, Bonds D, Brunner R, Brzyski R, Caan B, Chlebowski R, Curb D, Gass M, Hays J, Heiss G, Hendrix S, Howard BV, Hsia J, Hubbell A, Jackson R, Johnson KC, Judd H, Kotchen JM, Kuller L, LaCroix AZ, Lane D, Langer RD, Lasser N, Lewis CE, Manson J, Margolis K, Ockene J, O’Sullivan MJ, Phillips L, Prentice RL, Ritenbaugh C, Robbins J, Rossouw JE, Sarto G, Stefanick ML, Van Horn L, Wactawski-Wende J, Wallace R, Wassertheil-Smoller S. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004; 291: 1701–1712.
16. Straczek C, Oger E, Yon de Jonage-Canonico MB, Plu-Bureau G, Conard J, Meyer G, Alhenc-Gelas M, Levesque H, Trillot N, Barrellier MT, Wahl D, Emmerich J, Scarabin PY. Prothrombotic mutations, hormone therapy, and venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women: impact of the route of estrogen administration. Circulation. 2005; 112: 3495–3500.
17. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED): the PIOPED Investigators. JAMA. 1990; 263: 2753–2759.
18. Role of progestogen in hormone therapy for postmenopausal women: position statement of the North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2003; 10: 113–132.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Kumar N, Koide SS, Tsong Y, Sundaram K. Nestorone: a progestin with a unique pharmacological profile. Steroids. 2000; 65: 629–636.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Philibert D, Bouchoux F, Degryse M, Lecaque D, Petit F, Gaillard M. The pharmacological profile of a novel norpregnance progestin (trimegestone). Gynecol Endocrinol. 1999; 13: 316–326.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Sitruk-Ware R. New progestogens: a review of their effects in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Drugs Aging. 2004; 21: 865–883.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Kuhl H. Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration. Climacteric. 2005; 8 (suppl 1): 3–63.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Plu-Bureau G, Le MG, Sitruk-Ware R, Thalabard JC, Mauvais-Jarvis P. Progestogen use and decreased risk of breast cancer in a cohort study of premenopausal women with benign breast disease. Br J Cancer. 1994; 70: 270–277.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Canonico M, Straczek C, Oger E, Plu-Bureau G, Scarabin PY. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and cardiovascular disease: an overview of main findings. Maturitas. 2006; 54: 372–379.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Poulter NR, Chang CL, Farley TM, Meirik O. Risk of cardiovascular diseases associated with oral progestagen preparations with therapeutic indications. Lancet. 1999; 354: 1610.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Vasilakis C, Jick H, del Mar Melero-Montes M. Risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism in users of progestagens alone. Lancet. 1999; 354: 1610–1611.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Vasilakis-Scaramozza C, Jick H. Risk of venous thromboembolism with cyproterone or levonorgestrel contraceptives. Lancet. 2001; 358: 1427–1429.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Cano A, Van Baal WM. The mechanisms of thrombotic risk induced by hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 2001; 40: 17–38.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Scarabin PY, Alhenc-Gelas M, Plu-Bureau G, Taisne P, Agher R, Aiach M. Effects of oral and transdermal estrogen/progesterone regimens on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17: 3071–3078.
30. Oger E, Alhenc-Gelas M, Lacut K, Blouch MT, Roudaut N, Kerlan V, Collet M, Abgrall JF, Aiach M, Scarabin PY, Mottier D. Differential effects of oral and transdermal estrogen/progesterone regimens on sensitivity to activated protein C among postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 1671–1676.
31. Post MS, Christella M, Thomassen LG, van der Mooren MJ, van Baal WM, Rosing J, Kenemans P, Stehouwer CD. Effect of oral and transdermal estrogen replacement therapy on hemostatic variables associated with venous thrombosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study in postmenopausal women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 1116–1121.
32. Alhenc-Gelas M, Plu-Bureau G, Guillonneau S, Kirzin JM, Aiach M, Ochat N, Scarabin PY. Impact of progestagens on activated protein C (APC) resistance among users of oral contraceptives. J Thromb Haemost. 2004; 2: 1594–1600.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Conard J, Basdevant A, Thomas JL, Ochsenbein E, Denis C, Guyene TT, Degrelle H. Cardiovascular risk factors and combined estrogen-progestin replacement therapy: a placebo-controlled study with nomegestrol acetate and estradiol. Fertil Steril. 1995; 64: 957–962.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. van Baal WM, Emeis JJ, van der Mooren MJ, Kessel H, Kenemans P, Stehouwer CD. Impaired procoagulant–anticoagulant balance during hormone replacement therapy? A randomised, placebo-controlled 12-week study. Thromb Haemost. 2000; 83: 29–34.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Post MS, Hendriks DF, Van Der Mooren MJ, Van Baal WM, Leurs JR, Emeis JJ, Kenemans P, Stehouwer CD. Oral oestradiol/trimegestone replacement reduces procarboxypeptidase U (TAFI): a randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week study in early postmenopausal women. J Intern Med. 2002; 251: 245–251.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Perrot-Applanat M, Cohen-Solal K, Milgrom E, Finet M. Progesterone receptor expression in human saphenous veins. Circulation. 1995; 92: 2975–2983.
37. Jick H, Vessey MP. Case–control studies in the evaluation of drug-induced illness. Am J Epidemiol. 1978; 107: 1–7.
38. Prentice RL, Langer R, Stefanick ML, Howard BV, Pettinger M, Anderson G, Barad D, Curb JD, Kotchen J, Kuller L, Limacher M, Wactawski-Wende J. Combined postmenopausal hormone therapy and cardiovascular disease: toward resolving the discrepancy between observational studies and the Women’s Health Initiative clinical trial. Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 162: 404–414.
39. Simon T, Beau Yon de Jonage-Canonico M, Oger E, Wahl D, Conard J, Meyer G, Emmerich J, Barrellier MT, Guiraud A, Scarabin PY. Indicators of lifetime endogenous estrogen exposure and risk of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2006; 4: 71–76.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
 |
|
 |
|
  K Wylie and F Malik Review of drug treatment for female sexual dysfunction Int J STD AIDS, October 1, 2009; 20(10): 671 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. D. Langer Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Low-Dose Hormone Therapy in Managing Menopausal Symptoms J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2009; 22(5): 563 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Sanchez, B. Planquette, and G. Meyer Update on acute pulmonary embolism Eur. Respir. Rev., September 1, 2009; 18(113): 137 - 147. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Gungor, I. Kalelioglu, and A. Turfanda Vascular Effects of Estrogen and Progestins and Risk of Coronary Artery Disease: Importance of Timing of Estrogen Treatment Angiology, June 1, 2009; 60(3): 308 - 317. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.F. Arnal, P. Gourdy, and T. Simoncini Interference of Progestins With Endothelial Actions of Estrogens: A Matter of Glucocorticoid Action or Deprivation? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2009; 29(4): 441 - 443. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. M. Nelson Primary Ovarian Insufficiency N. Engl. J. Med., February 5, 2009; 360(6): 606 - 614. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. L. S. Gass, S. S. Bassuk, and J. E. Manson Reassessing Benefits and Risks of Hormone Therapy American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, January 1, 2009; 3(1): 29 - 43. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Rathbun Venous thromboembolism in women Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2008; 13(3): 255 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Canonico, E. Bouaziz, L. Carcaillon, C. Verstuyft, A. Guiochon-Mantel, L. Becquemont, P.-Y. Scarabin, and for the Estrogen Thromboembolism Risk (ESTHER) Stu Synergism between Oral Estrogen Therapy and Cytochrome P450 3A5*1 Allele on the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism among Postmenopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 3082 - 3087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Barbieri Update in Female Reproduction: A Life-Cycle Approach J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2439 - 2446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Roberts Type of hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism BMJ, May 31, 2008; 336(7655): 1203 - 1204. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Shifren, N. Rifai, S. Desindes, M. McIlwain, G. Doros, and N. A. Mazer A Comparison of the Short-Term Effects of Oral Conjugated Equine Estrogens Versus Transdermal Estradiol on C-Reactive Protein, Other Serum Markers of Inflammation, and Other Hepatic Proteins in Naturally Menopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 1702 - 1710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. M. Sellers and J. N. Stallone Sympathy for the devil: the role of thromboxane in the regulation of vascular tone and blood pressure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H1978 - H1986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. D. Yi, Z. Y. Cai, D. F. Covey, and J. W. Simpkins Estrogen Receptor-Independent Neuroprotection via Protein Phosphatase Preservation and Attenuation of Persistent Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Activation J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2008; 324(3): 1188 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Vitale, G. Mercuro, E. Cerquetani, G. Marazzi, R. Patrizi, F. Pelliccia, M. Volterrani, M. Fini, P. Collins, and G. M.C. Rosano Time Since Menopause Influences the Acute and Chronic Effect of Estrogens on Endothelial Function Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2008; 28(2): 348 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M.-C. Micheletti and T. Chevallier Letter by Micheletti and Chevallier Regarding Article, "Hormone Therapy and Venous Thromboembolism Among Postmenopausal Women: Impact of the Route of Estrogen Administration and Progestogens: The ESTHER Study" Circulation, September 25, 2007; 116(13): e362 - e362. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Canonico, E. Oger, G. Plu-Bureau, P.-Y. Scarabin, J. Conard, G. Meyer, H. Levesque, N. Trillot, M.-T. Barrellier, D. Wahl, et al. Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Hormone Therapy and Venous Thromboembolism Among Postmenopausal Women: Impact of the Route of Estrogen Administration and Progestogens: The ESTHER Study" Circulation, September 25, 2007; 116(13): e363 - e363. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Booth and B. R. Lucchesi Medroxyprogesterone acetate prevents the cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of 17beta-estradiol in an in vivo model of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1408 - H1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C.S. Vieira, R.A. Ferriani, A.A. Garcia, M.C. Pintao, G.D. Azevedo, M.K.O. Gomes, and M.F. Silva-de-Sa Use of the etonogestrel-releasing implant is associated with hypoactivation of the coagulation cascade Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2196 - 2201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Haas, M. R. Meyer, U. Schurr, I. Bhattacharya, R. Minotti, H. H. Nguyen, A. Heigl, M. Lachat, M. Genoni, and M. Barton Differential Effects of 17{beta}-Estradiol on Function and Expression of Estrogen Receptor {alpha}, Estrogen Receptor {beta}, and GPR30 in Arteries and Veins of Patients With Atherosclerosis Hypertension, June 1, 2007; 49(6): 1358 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Blood Clots: Is It All in the Delivery? Journal Watch Women's Health, April 5, 2007; 2007(405): 2 - 2. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Rexrode and J. E. Manson Are Some Types of Hormone Therapy Safer Than Others?: Lessons From the Estrogen and Thromboembolism Risk Study Circulation, February 20, 2007; 115(7): 820 - 822. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||