CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 115/22/2848    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.106.654210v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bergler-Klein, J. Articles by Baumgartner, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bergler-Klein, J. Articles by Baumgartner, H. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Related Collections Other heart failure Valvular heart disease CV surgery: valvular disease

(Circulation. 2007;115:2848-2855.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Valvular Heart Disease

B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis

Relationship to Hemodynamics and Clinical Outcome: Results From the Multicenter Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis (TOPAS) Study

Jutta Bergler-Klein, MD; Gerald Mundigler, MD; Philippe Pibarot, DVM, PhD; Ian G. Burwash, MD; Jean G. Dumesnil, MD; Claudia Blais, MSc; Christina Fuchs, MD; Dania Mohty, MD, MSc; Rob S. Beanlands, MD; Zeineb Hachicha, MD; Nicole Walter-Publig, MD; Florian Rader, MD; Helmut Baumgartner, MD

From the Department of Cardiology (J.B.-K., G.M., C.F., N.W.-P., F.R., H.B.), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Laval Hospital/Quebec Heart Institute (P.P., J.G.D., C.B., D.M., Z.H.), Laval University, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada; and the University of Ottawa Heart Institute (I.G.B, R.S.B), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to Jutta Bergler-Klein, MD, Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer-Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail jutta.bergler-klein{at}meduniwien.ac.at

Received August 11, 2006; accepted March 19, 2007.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Background— The prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is unknown in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS). We sought to evaluate the relationship between AS and rest, stress hemodynamics, and clinical outcome.

Methods and Results— BNP was measured in 69 patients with low-flow AS (indexed effective orifice area <0.6 cm²/m², mean gradient 40 mm Hg, left ventricular ejection fraction 40%). All patients underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography and were classified as truly severe or pseudosevere AS by their projected effective orifice area at normal flow rate of 250 mL/s (effective orifice area 1.0 cm² or >1.0 cm²). BNP was inversely related to ejection fraction at rest (Spearman correlation coefficient r_s=–0.59, P<0.0001) and at peak stress (r_s=–0.51, P<0.0001), effective orifice area at rest (r_s=–0.50, P<0.0001) and at peak stress (r_s=–0.46, P=0.0002), and mean transvalvular flow (r_s=–0.31, P=0.01). BNP was directly related to valvular resistance (r_s=0.42, P=0.0006) and wall motion score index (r_s=0.36, P=0.004). BNP was higher in 29 patients with truly severe AS versus 40 with pseudosevere AS (median, 743 pg/mL [Q1, 471; Q3, 1356] versus 394 pg/mL [Q1, 191 to Q3, 906], P=0.012). BNP was a strong predictor of outcome. In the total cohort, cumulative 1-year survival of patients with BNP 550 pg/mL was only 47±9% versus 97±3% with BNP <550 (P<0.0001). In 29 patients who underwent valve replacement, postoperative 1-year survival was also markedly lower in patients with BNP 550 pg/mL (53±13% versus 92±7%).

Conclusions— BNP is significantly higher in truly severe than pseudosevere low-gradient AS and predicts survival of the whole cohort and in patients undergoing valve replacement.

Key Words: aorta • echocardiography • natriuretic peptides • prognosis • survival • valves

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) represent the most challenging subset of patients with AS to manage.^1,2 Their operative mortality has been shown to be particularly high,^3–5 and it remains unclear which patients benefit from valve replacement and which patients should be treated medically or eventually undergo heart transplantation. The distinction between truly severe AS (TS AS), in which left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is secondary to longstanding severe AS, and pseudosevere AS (PS AS), in which a nonsevere valve stenosis appears severe because of concomitant LV dysfunction from other causes and results in low forward flow and reduced valve opening, remains difficult but is considered critical for therapeutic decisions.^6–9 Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has been shown to be useful to distinguish TS AS from PS AS,^10,11 but whether it can reliably predict the outcome with surgery remains to be proven. Monin et al demonstrated in their initial reports^3,12 that patients with contractile reserve at DSE had a good survival after surgery, whereas outcome was poor in those without contractile reserve, regardless of the type of treatment (ie, medical or surgical). However, in a more recent study,¹³ the same investigators reported that a substantial proportion of patients without contractile reserve may benefit from valve replacement, although it remained unclear how to identify these patients. Thus, better criteria are necessary to select the appropriate patients for surgery.

Editorial p 2799

Clinical Perspective p 2855

Plasma levels of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) have recently been shown to relate to AS severity^14–18 and predict symptoms,^19,20 survival, and postoperative outcome.^20–22 However, no data have been reported for the subset of patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the relationship between BNP and the hemodynamic and clinical variables at study entry in patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS enrolled in the Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis (TOPAS) multicenter study and whether BNP would be useful to separate patients with TS AS from those with PS AS. More important, we studied whether BNP is a predictor of outcome and may therefore aid in clinical decision making for surgical versus medical treatment in these challenging patients.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Patients and Study Protocol
The design of the TOPAS multicenter (Quebec Heart Institute, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, and Vienna General Hospital) prospective study has previously been described in detail.¹¹ Patients with AS were included when the effective orifice area (EOA) was 1.2 cm², the indexed EOA 0.6 cm²/m², mean gradient 40 mm Hg, and LV ejection fraction (EF) 40% on Doppler-echocardiographic examination. Exclusion criteria were aortic regurgitation >2+, mitral valve disease with valve area <2.0 cm² or regurgitation >2+ caused by intrinsic valve pathology, atrial fibrillation, paced rhythm, unstable angina, acute pulmonary edema, pregnancy or lactation, and end-stage renal disease. In addition, patients with plasma creatinine >3 mg/dL were excluded in the BNP substudy.

The study was approved by the local ethics committees and patients gave written informed consent.

From July 2002 to November 2005, 69 patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS were recruited in the study. Baseline characteristics of all patients are shown in Table 1.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 1. Patient Characteristics at Baseline

As described previously,¹¹ all patients underwent a medical history and physical examination. Coronary artery disease was defined as a significant stenosis on coronary angiography (70% stenosis) or a history of myocardial infarction. Resting ECG and blood samples for determination of creatinine, hematocrit, hemoglobin, and BNP were obtained.

Doppler echocardiography was performed at rest and under dobutamine stress as reported in detail.¹¹ Cardiac output was determined by multiplication of the heart rate by the stroke volume, derived in the LV outflow tract (LVOT) from the product of the LVOT velocity-time integral and cross-sectional area. Cine loops of apical 4-and 2-chamber, parasternal long-axis, and short-axis views were obtained and the LVEF and wall motion score index were measured off-line. The LVEF was determined by the Simpson method. The wall motion score index was derived by addition of the wall motion score of each of the 16 myocardial segments (0, normal; 1, hypokinetic; 2, akinetic; 3, dyskinetic) and division by the number of visualized segments.

The therapeutic decision of valve replacement or medical treatment was left to the discretion of the treating physician. The treating physicians were blinded to the BNP measurements. A follow-up assessment for mortality was scheduled at 1 and 2 years after valve replacement or after the baseline evaluation when patients remained on medical treatment.

Patients were independently divided into groups with TS AS and PS AS based on the results of DSE. A projected EOA at normal flow rate (250 mL/s) 1.0 cm² was used to defined TS AS.¹¹ We previously demonstrated that the projected EOA is superior to the other conventional indices (ie, EOA, gradient, and resistance) to assess stenosis severity in low-flow AS patients because it corrects for the important interindividual variability in flow rate increase that may occur during DSE.¹¹

Additionally, in patients who underwent aortic valve replacement, the severity of the stenosis was assessed by visual inspection of the valve at the time of operation as previously reported.¹¹ In brief, the location and degree of commissural fusion was described and the stiffness of each valve leaflet assessed in situ to discriminate TS AS from PS AS.

Measurement of BNP Plasma Levels
Venous blood samples were drawn at entry visit from an antecubital vein into chilled ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid Vacutainer test tubes after 30 minutes of rest with patients in a supine position. Samples were placed immediately on ice and plasma separation was performed at –4°C. Plasma samples were frozen at –70°C until assay. BNP was determined by a commercially available fluorescence immunoassay (Triage BNP Test, Biosite Diagnostics, Inc, San Diego, Calif). Relation of BNP levels to DSE findings and clinical outcome were studied.

Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables are expressed as mean±SD. BNP levels are described by the median (Q1 to Q3). Differences between patient groups were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and 2-sample t test for continuous variables or ² test for categorical variables. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Logarithmic transformation was performed because BNP levels were not normally distributed. Statistical comparisons of BNP between groups were performed with Wilcoxon rank sum test. The correlation analysis of BNP levels with quantitative measurements was performed with the Spearman correlation coefficient (r_s). A BNP cutoff of 550 pg/mL close to the median of the study cohort was selected for outcome analysis based on previous experience.^20,23 Overall cumulative survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method for patient groups with BNP <550 pg/mL or 550 pg/mL, and differences between groups were calculated with the log-rank test. Simple Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to identify the predictors of survival. For all analyses, commercially available statistical package software was used (SPSS version 11.5, SPSS, Inc, Chicago, Ill; and StatView SAS version 5.0.1, SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC).

The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
BNP Plasma Levels
BNP was markedly higher in this series of patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS (median [Q1 to Q3]: 523 pg/mL [239 to 971]) compared with the data reported in the literature for AS patients with preserved LV function (converted from pmol/L: 97 pg/mL [48 to 152];¹⁹ 143 pg/mL [70 to 278];²⁰ and 97 pg/mL [58 to 228]²¹). Nonetheless, the BNP values varied widely in our series. No significant differences were observed between women (n=13; 459 pg/mL [200 to 995]) and men (n=56; 534 pg/mL [310 to 963]).

Relationship Between BNP and Echocardiographic Parameters
BNP was inversely related to EF at rest (r_s=–0.59, P<0.0001) and at peak stress (r_s=–0.51, P<0.0001), stroke volume (r_s=–0.33, P=0.006), and mean transvalvular flow rate (r_s=–0.31, P=0.01); it was directly related to the wall motion score index (r_s=0.36, P=0.004). BNP was inversely related to EOA at rest (r_s=–0.50, P<0.0001) and at peak stress (r_s=–0.46, P=0.0002), and directly related to valvular resistance (r_s=0.42, P=0.0006). However, BNP was not significantly related to age, weight, body surface area, or presence of coronary artery disease (Table 2).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 2. BNP and Relation to Echocardiographic and Clinical Variables

BNP in Truly Severe and Pseudosevere Aortic Stenosis
BNP was significantly higher in the 29 patients with TS AS compared with the 40 patients with PS AS as classified by DSE (743 pg/mL [471 to 1356] versus 394 pg/mL [191 to 906], P=0.012). However, the overlap between groups was considerable (Figure 1A). There were no significant differences in EF (28±8 versus 29±9%), presence of coronary artery disease, or New York Heart Association functional class between groups. TS AS patients had, however, higher mean gradients (TS AS 26±7 versus PS AS 16±6 mm Hg, P<0.0001). Of 29 patients referred for aortic valve replacement, 20 patients were classified as TS AS and 9 patients as PS AS in DSE.

View larger version (7K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. BNP in pseudosevere (PS) and truly severe (TS) aortic stenosis. A, TS AS was defined as a projected effective orifice area 1.0 cm2 (PS, n=40; TS, n=29; P=0.012). B, In the patients who underwent aortic valve replacement, the discrimination between TS AS and PS AS was based on the visual inspection of the valve at the time of operation (PS, n=11; TS, n=14; P=0.04). This data were missing for 4 of the 29 patients who underwent valve replacement. The box defines the interquartile range with the median indicated by the crossbar. The whiskers indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles; dots indicate observations beyond these percentiles.

Among patients who underwent aortic valve replacement, BNP levels were also significantly higher in 14 patients with TS AS compared with 11 patients with PS AS as defined by the surgeon at the time of valve replacement (829 pg/mL [523 to 1340] versus 374 pg/mL [239 to 949], P=0.04); the intraoperative assessment of stenosis severity was not performed in 4 patients. Again, the overlap of values was considerable (Figure 1B).

BNP and Outcome
Patients were followed for 411±343 days (1 to 1147 days). Aortic valve replacement was performed in 29 patients 67±83 days (2 to 340 days) after study entry at the discretion of their treating physician. Surgically treated patients had higher BNP levels than those managed conservatively (691 pg/mL [436 to 1130] versus 422 pg/mL [188 to 948], P=0.046). The surgical patients were also younger (66±11 years versus 73±9 years, P=0.006) and had lower EOA (0.83±0.18 cm² versus 0.98±0.24 cm², P=0.002), whereas their LVEF was similar (28±9% versus 29±9%, P=0.57).

During follow up, 20 patients died after 154±142 days (5 to 416 days). Nine of these patients were in the surgical group (death 64±93 days after surgery, 1 to 269 days). All deaths were of cardiac cause. Postoperative follow-up of patients who survived valve replacement was 541±295 days (11 to 998 days).

BNP was significantly higher in the 20 patients who died during follow-up compared with 49 survivors (850 pg/mL [740 to 1124] versus 422 pg/mL [210 to 928], P=0.004). Patients who died were also older (74±9 versus 68±10 years, P=0.03), had smaller body surface area (1.77 m² versus 1.91 m², P=0.02) and smaller indexed EOA (0.45±0.12 cm²/m² versus 0.53±0.12 cm²/m², P=0.02), whereas LVEF was similar in nonsurvivors and survivors (26±8% versus 29±9%, P=0.15).

Median BNP levels tended to be higher in the subgroup of 9 patients who died after aortic valve replacement compared with the 20 surgical survivors (Figure 2); however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (794 pg/mL [698 to 1639] versus 422 pg/mL [366 to 1186]). However, among patients who died after valve replacement, significantly more had a baseline BNP 550 pg/mL compared with those who survived (8 of 9 [89%] versus 8 of 20 [40%], P=0.02). No significant difference in age (68±10 years versus 65±11 years, P=0.37) or LVEF (25±9% versus 28±8%, P=0.38) was observed between groups. Patients who died postoperatively, however, had lower preoperative aortic valve EOAs (0.74±0.14 cm² versus 0.89±0.18 cm², P=0.04). In 16 patients in whom postoperative BNP was available, a marked decrease in BNP was observed (baseline BNP 717 pg/mL [414 to 1407], postoperative BNP 278 pg/mL [106 to 488], P=0.003) at a mean follow-up of 8.9±7.3 months postoperatively.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. BNP of survivors () and nonsurvivors (gray) in the medically treated (left: survivors, n=29; nonsurvivors, n=11) and surgically treated (right: survivors, n=20; nonsurvivors, n=9) patients. The box defines the interquartile range with the median indicated by the crossbar. The whiskers indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles; dots indicate observations beyond these percentiles.

In the entire patient population, 33 (48%) patients had a baseline BNP 550 pg/mL. There was no significant difference in age (71±10 years versus 69±11 years, P=0.25), but differences in New York Heart Association functional class (2.8±0.6 versus 2.3±0.9, P=0.01), EOA (0.81±0.21 cm² versus 0.98±0.20 cm², P=0.001) and LVEF (24±9% versus 33±6%, P<0.0001) were observed between the groups with BNP 550 pg/mL compared with BNP <550 pg/mL. Table 3 depicts the relationship between BNP <550 pg/mL or 550 pg/mL and survival in patients with TS AS and PS AS treated medically or surgically. The subgroups were too small for statistical analyses; however, a consistent pattern of higher mortality was observed in patients with BNP 550 pg/mL.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   TABLE 3. Survival in Patients With BNP <550 or 550 pg/mL With Truly Severe or Pseudosevere Aortic Stenosis Treated Medically or Surgically

Survival at 1 year was very poor in patients with BNP 550 pg/mL (47±9%) but surprisingly good in those with BNP <550 pg/mL (97±3%, P<0.0001) (Figure 3A). The same was true when the subgroups with surgical and medical treatment were considered. Cumulative 1-year survival was 39±13% in medically treated patients with BNP 550 pg/mL but 100% in those with BNP <550 pg/mL (Figure 3B). In the surgically treated group, 30-day mortality was 19% in patients with BNP 550 pg/mL versus 8% in those with BNP <550 pg/mL, and 1-year survival was 53±13% versus 92±7% (Figure 3C).

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. A, Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the entire study population according to baseline BNP <550 or 550 pg/mL. B, Kaplan-Meier survival curve for patients who underwent medical treatment according to baseline BNP <550 or 550 pg/mL. C, Kaplan-Meier survival curve for patients who underwent surgical treatment according to baseline BNP <550 or 550 pg/mL. D, Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the entire study population according to baseline BNP <550 or 550 pg/mL and contractile reserve defined by increase of stroke volume 20% (SV 20%) or <20% (SV <20%) at peak DSE. AVR indicates aortic valve replacement; SV, stroke volume.

In 36 patients with contractile reserve defined by increase of stroke volume 20% at peak DSE, 1-year survival was strikingly lower in patients with BNP 550 pg/mL (48±12%) compared with those with BNP <550 pg/mL (93±6%) (Figure 3D). The same pattern was observed in the subset (n=32) of patients with no or poor contractile reserve (50±14% versus 100%).

Only age 70 years (P=0.015), New York Heart Association class 2 (P=0.006), resting EOA 0.8 cm² (P=0.005), poor contractile reserve defined by a peak transvalvular flow rate <250 mL/s on DSE (P=0.0017), and BNP 550 pg/mL (P<0.001) were significant predictors of outcome for the total cohort. A trend was observed for diabetes (P=0.05). Gender, coronary artery disease, LVEF, aortic valve replacement, and projected indexed EOA were not significantly related to outcome. Of note, BNP level was the most powerful predictor of outcome. However, the number of patients was too small to perform multivariate analysis and thus confirm the independent contribution of this variable to the prediction of outcome.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge
It is well known that AS can be successfully treated by valve replacement even at a late stage of disease when LV dysfunction has developed.⁷ Connolly et al²⁴ demonstrated in a large group of patients with AS and EF <35% that surgery can be performed with acceptable operative mortality and that most patients will have an improvement in symptoms and LV function. However, most patients in this series had relatively high gradients (mean gradient >40 mm Hg) despite a markedly reduced EF. There is however a small subset of patients who present with small valve areas, which indicates severe AS but low gradients caused by a low flow rate, and who have a high operative mortality of 8% to 33% and a higher chance of remaining in congestive heart failure after surgery.^3–5,13 It has been hypothesized that patients primarily improve when LV dysfunction is the result of afterload mismatch associated with AS, but they may not benefit when the LV dysfunction is caused by other myocardial disease.²⁵ In the latter patients the valve stenosis may not even be severe. Rather, the valve may be only mild to moderately diseased and may not open fully because of the low driving forces. Thus the separation of TS AS from PS AS is considered critical for the selection of patients for surgery. The response of valve area and gradient to a dobutamine-induced flow increase can help distinguish between TS AS and PS AS;^10,11 however, this differentiation remains difficult. More important, it is still not clear whether distinction between these entities is the appropriate basis for the decision to operate on a patient. The French multicenter study^3,12 on low-flow, low-gradient AS demonstrated that the assessment of contractile reserve during DSE provides important information for patient risk stratification. From their first report,¹² it appeared that only patients with contractile reserve should undergo surgery, as these patients were likely to have a good outcome after valve replacement, whereas survival was poor in patients without contractile reserve regardless of whether or not they had surgery. In the second larger series, however, the same authors³ reported that outcome, although poor overall, was still significantly better with surgery, even in the group without contractile reserve. More recently, the same group published a third study that showed that although the absence of LV contractile reserve is associated with an increased operative mortality, most of the survivors manifest an improvement in symptoms and LVEF.^9,13 The authors therefore concluded that the absence of contractile reserve is useful for operative risk stratification, but that it should not preclude consideration for aortic valve replacement. However, from these data, it remained unclear how to identify those patients in the subgroup with no contractile reserve who benefit from surgery. Thus, current research should focus on better criteria to decide between valve replacement and medical treatment or eventual heart transplantation in this difficult patient subset.

Natriuretic Peptides in Aortic Stenosis
Natriuretic peptides are independent predictors of outcome in a variety of heart disease such as congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and coronary artery disease, as well as pulmonary embolism and primary pulmonary hypertension.^26–32 In AS, natriuretic peptides have recently been shown to correlate with stenosis severity, severity of symptoms, and LV dysfunction.^18–22 In asymptomatic patients with severe AS, BNP and N-terminal-proBNP predict the onset of symptoms and may therefore be helpful to select patients for early elective surgery.²⁰ Furthermore, neurohormones determined prior to valve replacement predict postoperative outcome with regard to survival, postoperative symptomatic status, and postoperative LV function.²⁰ Increased BNP has also recently been reported to be a risk factor for poor postoperative outcome in other adult cardiac surgery.³³ These results raise the question whether BNP can also (1) risk-stratify patients with low-flow AS, (2) help distinguish TS AS from PS AS, and (3) possibly help identify patients who benefit from valve replacement and those who would benefit more from medical treatment. However, no data have been available for this difficult patient subset.

BNP in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis
The present study is, to our knowledge, the first to examine BNP in low-flow, low-gradient AS. Similar to previous studies in other patient populations, BNP was inversely related to measures of LV function such as EF, stroke volume, and transvalvular flow.^26,27 Similar to other studies in patients with AS, BNP also increased with stenosis severity and demonstrated an inverse relation to valve area and direct relation to valve resistance.^17–19 Furthermore, BNP was significantly higher in TS AS than PS AS. This may be caused by the more extensive LV afterload in patients with more severe AS. Increased wall stress and myocardial stretch have been shown to release BNP, which has been referred to as the only "true" ventricular hormone, in various cardiac entities^26–28 and also in previous studies of AS.^14,16 Patients with TS AS had indeed higher gradients, whereas EF was similar in both groups. Because BNP increases with the severity of LV damage of any cause, it is not surprising that the overlap of BNP levels between PS AS and TS AS was too extensive to allow their differentiation in individual patients. In patients in whom postoperative BNP was available, a marked decline from baseline levels was observed after valve replacement, which supports the hypothesis of BNP release in response to wall stress and afterload.

The most important finding of the present study is the relationship between BNP and survival in low-flow, low-gradient AS. BNP 550 pg/mL was found to be the strongest predictor of survival when New York Heart Association functional class, LVEF, contractile reserve, type of treatment (surgical or medical), and other clinical variables such as coronary artery disease or diabetes were considered. The high prognostic value of BNP was found in the patient subset who underwent surgery as well as in the subset treated medically. Patients who underwent surgery and had BNP levels <550 pg/mL had an excellent 1-year survival (92±7%). However, surgical patients with BNP 550 pg/mL were found to have a 1-year survival of only 53±13%. Although this was still higher than in patients with similar BNP levels treated medically (39±13%), such poor outcome may indicate that heart transplantation should perhaps be considered as an alternative treatment in some patients of this high-risk group, if eligible for this therapy. In addition, it remains to be determined whether the utilization of less invasive techniques such as percutaneous or transapical valve replacement^34,35 would help reduce short-term mortality in the low-flow AS patients with BNP 550 pg/mL. However, more data are required before BNP can be used for therapeutic recommendations. The fact that patients with a low BNP have a good outcome in both the surgically and medically treated groups should not lead to the conclusion that valve replacement is of no benefit in this subset of patients. Importantly, the baseline characteristics of these 2 groups are different. In particular, the majority of patients who underwent surgery had TS AS, whereas most patients treated medically had PS AS. Hence, our results can only support the conclusion that low BNP predicts a favorable outcome in patients who are likely to have TS AS and undergo surgery and in patients who are likely to have PS AS and are treated medically.

Interestingly, patients both with and without contractile reserve (defined as previously proposed^3,13 by an increase of stroke volume 20% at peak DSE) had a good outcome as long as BNP was <550 pg/mL. On the other hand, outcome was poor in both groups when BNP was 550 pg/mL. Thus, it appears that BNP adds critical information beyond the contractile reserve assessment. BNP may help to identify those patients in the difficult subset of patients without contractile reserve who are likely to benefit from valve replacement.

Study Limitations
The population size of the present study is relatively small. However, larger studies in these very ill patients are difficult to achieve because low-flow AS is encountered in only about 5% of AS patients and follow-up is often limited by their dismal prognosis.

The therapeutic decision in the present study was left to the discretion of the treating physicians. However, a randomized treatment would not have been appropriate for ethical reasons. Importantly, treating physicians were blinded to the BNP measurements.

Conclusion
BNP is markedly elevated in low-flow, low-gradient AS and is related to variables of LV function and AS severity. BNP is significantly higher in TS AS compared with PS AS and predicts survival in the entire patient group, as well as postoperative outcome in those patients who undergo valve replacement. Survival is very poor in both surgically and medically treated patients when BNP is 550 pg/mL. Furthermore, in patients without contractile reserve, outcome is significantly reduced in patients with BNP 550 pg/mL. Therefore, BNP may provide important information for therapeutic decision-making in low-flow, low-gradient AS beyond commonly used clinical and DSE variables.

	Acknowledgments

 
Sources of Funding

The present study was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 57745), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and a grant of the Oesterreichische Nationalbank Anniversary Fund for the Promotion of Scientific Research and Teaching, Vienna, Austria. Dr Pibarot holds the Canada Research Chair in Valvular Heart Diseases, Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Christina Blais is the recipient of a PhD student scholarship from Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

Disclosures

None.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
1. Carabello B. Aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 677–682.[Free Full Text]

2. Rahimtoola S. Severe aortic stenosis with low systolic gradient: the good and bad news. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1892–1894.[Free Full Text]

3. Monin JL, Quere JP, Monchi M, Petit H, Baleynaud S, Chauvel C, Pop C, Ohlmann P, Lelguen C, Dehant P, Tribouilloy C, Gueret P. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation. 2003; 108: 319–324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Connolly HM, Oh JK, Schaff HV, Roger VL, Osborn SL, Hodge DO, Tajik AJ. Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction: result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1940–1946.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Brogan WC 3rd, Grayburn PA, Lange RA, Hillis LD. Prognosis after valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and a low transvalvular pressure gradient. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21: 1657–1660.[Abstract]

6. Burwash IG, Thomas DD, Sadahiro M, Pearlman AS, Verrier ED, Thomas R, Kraft CD, Otto CM. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1994; 89: 827–835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, de Leon AC Jr, Edmunds LH Jr, Fedderly BJ, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, McKay CR, Nishimura RA, O’Gara PT, O’Rourke RA, Rahimtoola SH. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32: 1486–1588.[Free Full Text]

8. Grayburn P. Assessment of low-gradient aortic stenosis with dobutamine. Circulation. 2006; 113: 604–606.[Free Full Text]

9. Lange RA, Hillis D. Dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1718–1720.[Free Full Text]

10. De Filippi CR, Willett DL, Brickner E, Appleton CP, Yancy CW, Eichhorn EJ, Grayburn PA. Usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients. Am J Cardiol. 1995; 75: 191–194.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Blais C, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, Dumesnil JG, Loho N, Rader F, Baumgartner H, Beanlands RS, Chayer B, Kadem L, Garcia D, Durand LG, Pibarot P. Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly Or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. Circulation. 2006; 113: 711–721.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Monin JL, Monchi M, Gest V, Duval-Moulin AM, Dubois-Range JL, Gueret P. Aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction and low transvalvular pressure gradients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 2101–2107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Quere JP, Monin JL, Levy F, Petit H, Baleynaud S, Chauvel C, Pop C, Ohlmann P, Lelguen C, Dehant P, Gueret P, Tribouilloy C. Influence of preoperative left ventricular contractile reserve on postoperative ejection fraction in low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1738–1744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Ikeda T, Matsuda K, Itoh H, Shirakami G, Miyamoto Y, Yoshimasa T, Nakao K, Ban T. Plasma levels of brain and atrial natriuretic peptides elevate in proportion to left ventricular end-systolic wall stress in patients with aortic stenosis. Am Heart J. 1997; 133: 307–314.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Prasad N, Bridges AB, Lang CC, Clarkson PB, MacLeod C, Pringle TH, Struthers AD, MacDonald TM. Brain natriuretic peptide concentrations in patients with aortic stenosis. Am Heart J. 1997; 133: 477–479.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Talwar S, Downie PF, Squire IB, Davies JE, Barnett DB, Ng LL. Plasma N-terminal proBNP and cardiotrophin-1 are elevated in aortic stenosis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2001; 3: 15–19.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Qi W, Mathisen P, Kjekshus J, Simonsen S, Bjornerheim R, Endresen K, Hall C. Natriuretic peptides in patients with aortic stenosis. Am Heart J. 2001; 142: 725–732.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Weber M, Arnold R, Rau M, Brandt R, Berkovitsch A, Mitrovic V, Hamm C. Relation of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide to severity of valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 94: 740–745.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Gerber IL, Stewart RA, Legget ME, West TM, French RL, Sutton TM, Yandle TG, French JK, Richards AM, White HD. Increased plasma natriuretic peptides reflect symptom onset in aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1884–1890.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Bergler-Klein J, Klaar U, Heger M, Rosenhek R, Mundigler G, Gabriel H, Binder T, Pacher R, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Natriuretic peptides predict symptom-free survival and postoperative outcome in severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2302–2308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Lim P, Monin JL, Monchi M, Garot J, Pasquet A, Hittinger L, Vanoverschelde JL, Carayon A, Gueret P. Predictors of outcome in severe aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular function: role of B-type natriuretic peptide. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25: 2048–2053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Weber M, Arnold R, Rau M, Elsaesser A, Brandt R, Mitrovic V, Hamm C. Relation of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide to progression of aortic valve disease. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 1023–1030.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Maisel AS, Clopton P, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM, McCord J, Hollander JE, Duc P, Omland T, Storrow AB, Abraham WT, Wu AH, Steg G, Westheim A, Knudsen CW, Perez A, Kazanegra R, Bhalla V, Herrmann HC, Aumont MC, McCullough PA; BNP Multinational Study Investigators. Impact of age, race, and sex on the ability of B-type natriuretic peptide to aid in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure: results from the Breathing Not Properly (BNP) multinational study. Am Heart J. 2004; 147: 1078–1084.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Connolly HM, Oh JK, Orszulak TA, Osborn SL, Roger VL, Hodge DO, Bailey KR, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators. Circulation. 1997; 95: 2395–2400.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Carabello BA, Green LH, Grossman W, Cohn LH, Koster JK, Collins JJ Jr. Hemodynamic determinants of prognosis of aortic valve replacement in critical aortic stenosis and advanced congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1980; 62: 42–48.[Free Full Text]

26. Maisel A. The coming of age of natriuretic peptides. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 61–64.[Free Full Text]

27. Richards AM, Nicholls MG, Yandle TG, Frampton C, Espiner EA, Turner JG, Buttimore RC, Lainchbury JG, Elliott JM, Ikram H, Crozier IG, Smyth DW. Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and adrenomedullin: new neurohormonal predictors of left ventricular function and prognosis after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1921–1929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Tsutamoto T, Wada A, Maeda K, Hisanaga T, Maeda Y, Fukai D, Ohnishi M, Sugimoto Y, Kinoshita M. Attenuation of compensation of endogenous cardiac natriuretic peptide system in chronic heart failure: prognostic role of plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration in patients with chronic symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 1997; 96: 509–516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Stanek B, Frey B, Hulsmann M, Berger R, Sturm B, Strametz-Juranek J, Bergler-Klein J, Moser P, Bojic A, Hartter E, Pacher R. Prognostic evaluation of neurohumoral plasma levels before and during ß-blocker therapy in advanced left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 436–442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Maisel AS, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM, McCord J, Hollander JE, Duc P, Omland T, Storrow AB, Abraham WT, Wu AH, Clopton P, Steg PG, Westheim A, Knudsen CW, Perez A, Kazanegra R, Herrmann HC, McCullough PA; for the Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study Investigators. Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 161–167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Kucher N, Printzen G, Goldhaber SZ. Prognostic role of brain natriuretic peptide in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2545–2547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Nagaya N, Nishikimi T, Uematsu M, Satoh T, Kyotani S, Sakamaki F, Kakishita M, Fukushima K, Okano Y, Nakanishi N, Miyatake K, Kangawa K. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a prognostic indicator in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2000; 102: 865–870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Provenchere S, Berroeta C, Reynaud C, Baron G, Poirier I, Desmonts JM, Iung B, Dehoux M, Philip I, Benessiano J. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin I concentrations after adult cardiac surgery: association with postoperative cardiac dysfunction and 1-year mortality. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34: 995–1000.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Webb JG, Chandavimol M, Thompson CR, Ricci DR, Carere RG, Munt BI, Buller CE, Pasupati S, Lichtenstein S. Percutaneous aortic valve implantation retrograde from the femoral artery. Circulation. 2006; 113: 842–850.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C, Bauer F, Agatiello C, Nercolini D, Tapiero S, Litzler PY, Bessou JP, Babaliaros V. Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 1214–1223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis represent the most challenging subset of patients with aortic stenosis to manage. Dobutamine stress echocardiography has been shown to be useful to distinguish truly severe from pseudosevere aortic stenosis and to assess myocardial contractile reserve. Although the absence of contractile reserve is associated with a high operative mortality, most of the survivors manifest an improvement of symptoms and left-ventricular systolic function. However, it remains unclear how to identify patients with poor contractile reserve who are likely to benefit from aortic valve replacement. In the present study, a plasma level of B-type natriuretic peptide 550 pg/mL was associated with markedly reduced survival in both surgically and medically treated patients. Moreover, patients without contractile reserve defined by an increase of stroke volume <20% on dobutamine stress echocardiography had a good outcome as long as B-type natriuretic peptide was <550 pg/mL. On the other hand, outcome was poor in both patients with contractile reserve and those without contractile reserve when B-type natriuretic peptide was 550 pg/mL. Therefore, B-type natriuretic peptide may provide useful information that will aid in therapeutic decision-making in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis beyond commonly used clinical and dobutamine stress echocardiography variables.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Lancellotti, C. Szymanski, M. Moonen, C. Garweg, K. O'Connor, C. Tribouilloy, and L. A. Pierard Dynamic left ventricular dyssynchrony: a potential cause of no contractile reserve in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis Eur J Echocardiogr, October 1, 2009; 10(7): 880 - 883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Weidemann, S. Herrmann, S. Stork, M. Niemann, S. Frantz, V. Lange, M. Beer, S. Gattenlohner, W. Voelker, G. Ertl, et al. Impact of Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Circulation, August 18, 2009; 120(7): 577 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. E. Coglianese and R. Davidoff Predicting Outcome in Patients With Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Circulation, July 7, 2009; 120(1): 9 - 11. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Tribouilloy, F. Levy, D. Rusinaru, P. Gueret, H. Petit-Eisenmann, S. Baleynaud, Y. Jobic, C. Adams, B. Lelong, A. Pasquet, et al. Outcome After Aortic Valve Replacement for Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Without Contractile Reserve on Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2009; 53(20): 1865 - 1873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. W. Troughton and A. M. Richards B-type natriuretic peptides and echocardiographic measures of cardiac structure and function. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., February 1, 2009; 2(2): 216 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Tribouilloy and F. Levy Assessment and management of low-gradient, low ejection fraction aortic stenosis Heart, December 1, 2008; 94(12): 1526 - 1527. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Dal-Bianco, B. K. Khandheria, F. Mookadam, F. Gentile, and P. P. Sengupta Management of Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 14, 2008; 52(16): 1279 - 1292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-A. Clavel, C. Fuchs, I. G. Burwash, G. Mundigler, J. G. Dumesnil, H. Baumgartner, J. Bergler-Klein, R. S. Beanlands, P. Mathieu, J. Magne, et al. Predictors of Outcomes in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Results of the Multicenter TOPAS Study Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14_suppl_1): S234 - S242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Subramanian, B. Kunadian, and J. Dunning Is it ever worth contemplating an aortic valve replacement on patients with low gradient severe aortic stenosis but poor left ventricular function with no contractile reserve? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2008; 7(2): 301 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Carabello Aortic Stenosis: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back Circulation, June 5, 2007; 115(22): 2799 - 2800. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 115/22/2848    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.106.654210v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bergler-Klein, J. Articles by Baumgartner, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bergler-Klein, J. Articles by Baumgartner, H. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Related Collections Other heart failure Valvular heart disease CV surgery: valvular disease