| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2007;115:2094-2102.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology |
From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY (Y.G., K.M.S., C.A.C., B.B.L., D.J.C.); Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Graduate School of Medical Sciences of Cornell University, New York, NY (D.J.C.); and Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles (F.X., A.G.).
Correspondence to Yunfan Gong, PhD, or David J. Christini, PhD, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 520 E 70th St, Box 161, New York, NY 10021. E-mail yfgong{at}hotmail.com or dchristi@med.cornell.edu
Received February 9, 2006; accepted February 16, 2007.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results We used parallel computational techniques to study an anatomically accurate 3-dimensional atrial structure incorporating a detailed ionic-current model of an atrial myocyte. At the single-cell level, upregulation of the L-type Ca2+ current ICa,L steepened restitution curves of action potential duration and conduction velocity compared with the control. Spontaneous firings of ectopic foci, coupled with sinus activity, produced dynamic spatial dispersions of repolarization, including discordant alternans, which caused conduction block and reentry only for the elevated ICa,L case. For each foci location, a vulnerable window for atrial flutter/atrial fibrillation induction was identified as a function of the coupling interval and focus cycle length. For ectopic foci in the pulmonary veins and left atrium, the site of conduction block and reentry gradually shifted, as a function of coupling interval, from the right atrium to the interatrial area and finally to the left atrium. The size of the vulnerable window was largest for pulmonary vein foci, becoming markedly smaller for right atrial foci, especially those near the sinoatrial node.
Conclusions These findings suggest that a mechanism of dynamically induced repolarization dispersion, especially discordant alternans, underlies the induction of atrial flutter/atrial fibrillation by atrial ectopic foci. The sites and likelihood of reentry induction varied according to ectopic focus location and timing, with the largest vulnerable window corresponding to the pulmonary vein region.
Key Words: action potentials arrhythmia atrial flutter dynamics fibrillation reentry waves
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent studies indicate that atrial flutter (AFL) and AF may share common triggers located in the PV region of the LA.2 Furthermore, studies have linked these 2 arrhythmias by showing alternans of atrial action potentials during the spontaneous transition from typical AFL to AF.3 Noncavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutters have been found in the right atrium (RA), interatrial septum and LA, or both atria in patients with or without underlying structural heart disease. Emerging evidence suggests that there may be a similar substrate or arrhythmogenic mechanism for the onset of AFL/AF and that this mechanism could be independent of the site of ectopic foci or the reentrant circuits. However, the properties of the substrate or the arrhythmogenic mechanism remain unclear.
Clinical Perspective p 2102
It is the central aim of the present study to illuminate the mechanism underlying the initiation of paroxysmal AFL/AF by ectopic foci. We performed extensive numerical simulations using an anatomically accurate 3-dimensional human atrial model and parallel computational techniques.
We systematically investigated the effects of 2 parameters(1) the coupling interval between sinus activation and the succeeding ectopic beat and (2) the cycle length of repetitive beats from that ectopic focuson the initiation of AFL/AF from various ectopic foci locations.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
174 M
). Note that with different isolation procedures, which affect isolation-sensitive currents such as IK1, the reported values for the input resistance of human atrial cells can vary in a large range.4 We increased gK1 by 200% so that gK1=0.27 nS/pF, which is close to the measurement of human atrial cells reported by Koumi et al.5 To initiate AFL/AF, the key parameter that we have altered is the maximum conductance of the L-type Ca2+ current gCa,L. Recent observations showed that blockade of L-type Ca2+ channels suppressed discordant alternans clinically for AF patients.6 On the basis of these studies, we set gCa,L=0.1857 nS/pF, an increase of 50% of the control (Figure 1A). Note that the modifications of gK1 and gCa,L are within the physiological ranges suggested by Courtemanche et al.4 With these modifications, the resulting APDs at a heart rate of 60 bpm for the control and the case, in which the L-type Ca2+ current ICa,L was elevated, are APD95=210 ms and APD95=235 ms (Figure 1B), respectively. Both are within the range of atrial refractory periods in humans7 and are comparable to previous modeling studies of atrial arrhythmias.8
|
Restitution Properties
Restitution, which refers to the relationship between electrophysiological properties of a propagating wave and the previous diastolic interval, was quantified with the use of the standard S1-S2 protocol.811 After pacing with 100 S1 beats at cycle length=500 ms, the APD and conduction velocity restitution (Figure 1C to 1F) were measured in a 1-dimensional atrial fiber (Figure I in the online-only Data Supplement) by varying the S2 timing. The conduction velocity was calculated from the time required for the activation wave to propagate a distance of 1 cm within a 2-cm-long atrial fiber.811
Atrial Anatomic Structure
We used a detailed human atrial geometry first proposed by Harrild and Henriquez.12 The model is 3-dimensional with both LA and RA (Figure IIA in the online-only Data Supplement). Major muscle bundles of the atria include the crista terminalis, pectinate muscles, limbus of the fossa ovalis, and Bachmanns bundle (Figure IIB in the online-only Data Supplement). Other anatomic obstacles are as follows: the tricuspid annulus, mitral annulus, inferior vena cava, superior vena cava, 4 PVs, coronary sinus, and fossa ovalis (Figure IIC to IIF in the online-only Data Supplement). The LA and RA are connected through 3 interatrial connections: the Bachmanns bundle, fossa ovalis, and coronary sinus as observed with simultaneous biatrial noncontact mapping in humans.13
By assigning different diffusion coefficients, as suggested previously,8,12 we obtained heterogeneous conduction regions in the atria (Figure IIB in the online-only Data Supplement). Specifically, the conduction velocities were 65 cm/s in the bulk tissue, 120 cm/s in the fast bundles, and 36 cm/s in the slow-conduction region. These values were measured from a 1-dimensional atrial fiber (Figure I in the online-only Data Supplement).
These conduction velocities are within, or very close to, realistic conduction velocities (normal, 60 to 75 cm/s; fast, 150 to 200 cm/s; slow, 30 to 40 cm/s).8,12 With these assignments, it takes
110 ms for a sinus wave to activate the whole atria, with the last activation occurring in the lateral posterior region of the LA, where 3 wave fronts converge (Movie I in the online-only Data Supplement). The results are comparable to the observations from previous experiments7 and simulation studies.8,12
Pacing Protocol
Sinus beats or ectopic beats were induced by an instantaneous voltage stimulus with an amplitude of 30 mV. The stimulus was approximately twice the diastolic threshold and was applied to a cube of 9x9x9 nodes. The pacing protocol was as follows: deliver a stimulus from the sinoatrial node (at 60 bpm); then, after a coupling interval following the sinoatrial nodal stimulus, a train of at least 10 (with the exception of Figure 2) ectopic foci were delivered from the ectopic focus location of interest (eg, the PVs of the LA) at a cycle length. The ectopic focus firings were stopped if no reentry was induced within 10 ectopic beats. The protocol is comparable to the real process during which paroxysmal AF can be triggered by repetitive ectopic beats.1
|
Isochronal Maps
Isochronal maps, which depict the activation sequence within a local region, were constructed by calculating the time elapsed since a given temporal reference point (eg, time 0 in Figure 2) at which the propagating wave front (defined with a threshold of 30 mV) passes through each spatial location.
Vortex Filaments
In a 2-dimensional atrial tissue, spiral wave reentry can be characterized by tracing the tip trajectory.9 In a 3-dimensional atrial anatomy, spiral waves become scroll waves, and, correspondingly, spiral tips become vortex filaments. Vortex filaments, which represent the number of scroll wavelets, were detected by calculating the intersection of 2 successive isovoltage lines (30 mV) arising from the propagating wave front.9,11 Moreover, they can indicate atrial regions where wave break occurs by showing the birth of new vortex filaments.
For details of other methods, including numerical methods, AFL and AF classification, and pseudo-ECG generation, please refer to the online-only Data Supplement.
The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To illuminate the spatiotemporal dynamics of the atrial cell model, a 1-dimensional atrial fiber was investigated for the control and the elevated ICa,L cases. Transitions from discordant alternans to conduction block in the atrial fiber were found only for the elevated ICa,L case, when it was paced with a cycle length from 200 to 160 ms. Figure I in the online-only Data Supplement shows such an example when cycle length=180 ms, at which discordant alternans was most prominent.
Dynamic Repolarization Dispersion and Conduction Block
Using the anatomically accurate 3-dimensional human atrial model, we performed extensive numerical simulations by exploring 2 parameters: (1) the coupling interval between sinus activation and the succeeding ectopic beat and (2) the cycle length of repetitive beats (
10) from that ectopic focus. In our simulations, we found that ectopic foci, coupled with sinus activity, produced dynamic spatial dispersion of repolarization, which caused unidirectional block and reentry only for the elevated ICa,L case. Typically, the unidirectional block and reentry were found around the cavotricuspid isthmus of the RA (Figure 2A) or the left PVs of the LA (Figure 2B), preceding the onset of AFL/AF (Movies I and III in the online-only Data Supplement).
Note that dispersion of APDs, including discordant alternans (Figure 3A), could be observed at multiple recording sites in the atria. (Although in a rigorous sense the term "alternans" requires several beats [
4] to be fully developed, we apply the term to the 2-beat pattern here because of the analogous APD versus diastolic interval long-short dynamics, the analogous mechanism of spatial discordance, and the demonstration of sustained alternans in the same cycle length range in the atrial fiber simulations of Figure I in the online-only Data Supplement.) Furthermore, within the range for which transient discordant alternans occurred (160
cycle length
200 ms; Figure I in the online-only Data Supplement), AFL/AF could be initiated by rapid firings of ectopic foci (Figure 4 and Table II in the online-only Data Supplement).
|
|
Figure 3 shows that ectopic firings from the left superior PVinduced conduction block and reentry in the cavotricuspid isthmus of the RA (Figure 3A) and left PVs (Figure 3B) for short and long coupling intervals, respectively. Specifically, when the coupling interval between the sinus beat and the first ectopic excitation was short (Figure 3A), the ectopic excitation had a short APD. This short APD allowed a longer subsequent diastolic interval before the second ectopic excitation, which therefore had a longer APD due to APD restitution. As the first ectopic wave propagated toward and into the RA, its preceding diastolic interval and therefore its APD gradually lengthened because the wave traveled against the repolarization gradient of the preceding sinus wave (Figure V in the online-only Data Supplement; this effect is known as "symmetry breaking"10,14). The APD lengthened to the extent that the second ectopic wave blocked in the cavotricuspid isthmus of the RA. Alternatively, when the coupling interval of the first ectopic excitation was long (Figure 3B), the ectopic excitation had a long APD. This long APD permitted only a short subsequent diastolic interval before the second ectopic excitation, which therefore had a shorter APD due to APD restitution. In fact, the diastolic interval was so short that conduction block occurred almost immediately in the region near the PVs. These 2 cases clearly demonstrate that both the orientation and timing of the ectopic beats relative to the preceding sinus beat are critically important for when or where conduction block will occur. Furthermore, these simulation results are consistent with predictions from Equation II in the online-only Data Supplement that relates conduction block with APD and conduction velocity restitutions and the spatial dispersion of diastolic interval of the first ectopic beat (see Conditions for Conduction Block in the online-only Data Supplement).
Vulnerable Window and Ectopic Foci
For certain cycle length and coupling interval combinations, AFL/AF could be initiated by rapid firing of ectopic foci (<10 beats). Each episode of AFL/AF lasted <5 seconds (Table II in the online-only Data Supplement). Figure 4 shows the induction of AFL/AF with ectopic foci from the 4 PVs, LA free wall, coronary sinus, inferior vena cava, superior vena cava, and crista terminalis, all regions from which ectopic foci have been observed clinically. However, the size and specific properties of the vulnerable window differed for different ectopic focus sites. In particular, within the vulnerable window for left superior PV ectopic foci (Figure 4A), the location of conduction block and reentry gradually shifted with increasing coupling interval, from the RA (black zone) to the interatrial region (red zone) to the LA (green zone) (Table II in the online-only Data Supplement), as a result of coupling intervaldependent dynamic spatial dispersion of repolarization (Figure 3). The sequential shifting feature is prominent for ectopic foci from all 4 PVs as well as the LA free wall (Figure 4B). Moreover, for ectopic foci in the RA, especially those nearest the sinoatrial node such as for the superior vena cava and crista terminalis, the size of the vulnerable window for the induction of AFL/AF became markedly smaller (Figure 4B) compared with that of the PV ectopic foci because of a reduced symmetry-breaking effect, as mentioned above (also see Discussion).10,14
Note that for smaller coupling intervals, atrial tissue was refractory from the last sinus beat, and therefore the first ectopic beat did not capture. Only coupling intervals greater than the refractory period were considered in the present study.
Atrial Flutter
After conduction block induced by left superior PV ectopic beats, different macroreentrant circuits during AFL were observed when coupling intervals were varied (see Table I in the online-only Data Supplement for details).
At shorter coupling intervals (black zone in Figure 4A), RA flutter was usually induced first (Movie I in the online-only Data Supplement). Within the vulnerable window (Table I in the online-only Data Supplement), 11 of 13 cases (85%) of RA flutter showed counterclockwise rotation around the tricuspid annulus, characteristic of "typical AFL." Moreover, RA flutter with tricuspid annulus counterclockwise rotation could evolve not only from conduction block at the isthmus region but also after conduction block around the fossa ovalis or at the inferior vena cava. While rotating counterclockwise around the tricuspid annulus, in 5 cases reentrant waves were also found rotating around the inferior vena cava either clockwise or counterclockwise (Table I in the online-only Data Supplement and Movie I in the online-only Data Supplement), as observed in the form of lower-loop reentry.15 Such dual-loop macroreentrant behavior involving both the inferior vena cava and tricuspid annulus is often observed in patients with typical AFL.16
Within a narrow range of intermediate coupling interval values (red zone in Figure 4A), macroreentry involved the interatrial region (Movie II in the online-only Data Supplement). After conduction block, typically at the Bachmanns bundle or the inferior septum of the LA, macroreentry was found revolving around the interatrial region including the Bachmanns bundle, atrial septum, coronary sinus, and fossa ovalis.
With further increases of coupling interval (green zone in Figure 4A), the location of conduction block and reentry quickly shifted to the LA, and LA flutter ensued (Movie III in the online-only Data Supplement). In this situation, the macroreentry was found mainly revolving around the mitral annulus (counterclockwise). For even longer coupling intervals, the conduction block moved to the left PVs, and the ensuing macroreentry revolved around the left PVs, in addition to the mitral annulus (Movie III in the online-only Data Supplement).
Atrial Fibrillation
Figure 5 shows an example of AF snapshots, in which arrows indicate directions of wave front propagation. In our simulations, AF could be initiated directly by a train of ectopic beats. However, because of a relatively small and uniform initial APD dispersion produced by the normal sinus rhythm (60 bpm), in most cases (Table II in the online-only Data Supplement) AF occurred from spontaneous conversion of AFL. Once AFL was initiated, the spontaneous conversion from AFL to AF could occur in either the presence or absence of ectopic firings. Interestingly, the conversion occurred through a brief fibrillatory conduction process (mean±SD, 570±300 ms),17 during which rapid electric impulses emanating from flutter circuits interacted with functional and/or anatomic obstacles throughout the atria, leading to fragmentation and wavelet formation (Movie I in the online-only Data Supplement). Within the vulnerable window (Table II in the online-only Data Supplement), approximately one third of AFL spontaneously converted to AF, with multiple wavelets simultaneously meandering in the atria.
|
Figure 6 shows that AF was characterized by multiple vortex filaments, reflecting the time-varying multiple-wavelet nature of AF. Vortex filaments (red) were found dispersed across the walls of the LA, RA, and even interatrial septum (Figure 6A), indicating wave fragmentation and formation in these regions. Moreover, the number of vortex filaments during the lifespan of an episode of AF (Figure 6B) varied from as few as 1 to as many as 9, which is comparable with previous optical mapping18 and modeling studies of AF.10 Instead of randomly meandering, vortex filaments were anchored at preferential sites such as the isthmus (Figure 6C) and the PV (Figure 6D), where they were first induced. The observed ECG characteristics during the onset of AF, that is, sinus rhythm followed by repetitive firings of ectopic foci and then AF (Figure IV in the online-only Data Supplement), are comparable to those observed clinically during the induction process of paroxysmal AF (Figure 3 in Haissaguerre et al1).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Additionally, for the elevated ICa,L case in our studies, the maximum slope of the APD restitution is slightly >1 (Figure 1C and 1D), as observed in patients with paroxysmal AF19 and previous modeling studies of AF.8,10
AFL/AF Induction Mechanism: Discordant Alternans and APD Dispersion
We found that ectopic foci, during sinus activity, produced dynamic spatial dispersion of repolarization. Such repolarization dispersion could cause unidirectional block and initiation of reentrant AFL/AF (Figure 2). Preceding the onset of AFL/AF, a large dispersion of APDs, often manifested as discordant alternans, was observed only for the elevated ICa,L case (Figure 3). This is consistent with recent observations in patients that discordant alternans facilitated the initiation of AF6 as well as the spontaneous transition between AFL and AF.3 In our simulations, AFL/AF could be initiated by rapid firing of ectopic foci with only a few beats (<10) (Figure 4 and Table II in the online-only Data Supplement), within the range for which transient discordant alternans occurred in the 1-dimensional fiber (160
cycle length
200 ms; Figure I in the online-only Data Supplement). In contrast, outside this range, AFL/AF could not be induced, or a train >10 beats was required to induce AFL/AF. Taken together, these results suggest a causal relationship between dynamic spatial dispersion of repolarization, notably discordant alternans, and the onset of AFL/AF.
In our simulations, AF could be initiated directly by a train of ectopic beats. More often, however, AF converted spontaneously from AFL (Table II in the online-only Data Supplement). The preference of AFL (a single macroreentrant circuit) over AF (multiple reentrant wavelets) induction by a few ectopic beats in our simulations was because of (1) a relatively small initial APD dispersion produced by sinus rhythm (60 bpm) preceding the ectopic beats and (2) a normal atrial anatomy (with no structural heart disease). Consistent with these observations, detailed mapping in AF patients showed that organized monomorphic AFL commonly occurred before paroxysmal AF.20 In addition, the regional distribution of organized monomorphic atrial arrhythmias was more extensive in patients with structural heart disease and persistent AF compared with patients without structural heart disease or paroxysmal AF.20 Therefore, these results support the clinical observation that AFL is induced preferably by focal discharges for a normal spatial dispersion of atrial refractoriness, whereas AF is more likely to be induced when the dispersion is increased,21 such as due to atrial inflammation or structural heart diseases.
Atrial Flutter
By simply varying the coupling interval between sinus activation and the ectopic firing, our results link, through a similar initiation mechanism, a variety of isolated clinical observations on AFL, including atypical/typical AFL, lower-loop reentry,15 dual-loop reentry,16 and LA flutter.22 In particular, within the vulnerable window for ectopic foci of the PVs and LA (Figure 4A and 4B), AFL circuits sequentially shifted with the increase of the coupling interval, from the RA to the interatrial region and to the LA (Table II in the online-only Data Supplement). The finding of such a link, particularly the sequential shifting phenomenon, among different AFL circuits as a function of the coupling interval is of significance for relating various AFL circuits observed clinically through a similar induction mechanism. In addition, a high percentage (85%) of the RA flutter occurred counterclockwise around the tricuspid annulus (Table I in the online-only Data Supplement), which agrees with the fact that AFL with tricuspid annulus counterclockwise rotation characteristics is "typically" observed in patients.
Preceding the induction of different macroreentry circuits in the RA, in particular for the typical isthmus-dependent AFL, functional block was found rarely in the region of the crista terminalis in our simulations (Table I in the online-only Data Supplement). This supports a similar conclusion reached in a previous analysis of human AFL.23
Atrial Fibrillation
In our simulations, the existence of a vulnerable window found for ectopic foci at various clinically observed locations, including those at the 4 PVs, LA free wall, coronary sinus, inferior vena cava, superior vena cava, and crista terminalis (Figure 4), suggests that the revealed mechanism underlying the induction of AFL/AF by ectopic foci is a general one and independent of the location of the foci. Within the vulnerable window for ectopic foci from the PVs and LA (Figure 4A and 4B), the location of conduction block and reentry arose from the RA, interatrial region, or LA (Table II in the online-only Data Supplement). This is consistent with a detailed mapping study that showed that organized monomorphic atrial tachyarrhythmias induced by premature beats could first arise from the RA, interatrial region, or LA in patients with AF.20 Moreover, for ectopic foci in the RA, especially those closer to the sinoatrial node such as the superior vena cava and crista terminalis, the size of the vulnerable window for the induction of AFL/AF became markedly smaller than that of the PV ectopic foci (Figure 4B). The effect of increasing vulnerable window size when increasing the distance between 2 pacing sites (in this case sinoatrial node and ectopic focus) has been attributed to a physical principle known as symmetry breaking,10,14 as described in Dynamic Repolarization Dispersion and Conduction Block in Results. Our findings of larger vulnerable windows for PV ectopic foci suggest the preference of these sites for inducing AFL/AF and may help in our understanding of why the PV ectopic foci in the LA play a dominant role in inducing AFL/AF.
Our results showing that for certain cycle length and coupling interval combinations, AFL/AF could be initiated with just a few (<10) ectopic beats (Table II in the online-only Data Supplement) agree with clinical observations on the initiation of paroxysmal AF.1 Remarkably, the range of coupling interval for AFL/AF induction for our simulations (330 to 470 ms; Figure 4A and 4B) is consistent with that observed in patients with paroxysmal AF (Figure 2 in Jensen et al24). In addition, the range of cycle length to induce AFL/AF in our simulations (160 to 210 ms; Figure 4A) falls within that of clinical observations (110 to 270 ms; mean, 175 ms).1 The result of AFL/AF induction as a function of the coupling interval (Figure 4 and Table II in the online-only Data Supplement) is supported by a preliminary clinical study that found that the coupling interval of atrial premature beats played a critical role in the inducibility of AFL or AF.25 These results could be used to resolve one of the most intriguing issues related to paroxysmal AF: how it can be triggered by short coupling atrial ectopic beats during normal heart rate in patients with structurally normal hearts, including children and adolescents.
Note that the effects of remodeling were not the main focus of the present study. However, it has been shown that once AFL/AF was initiated, its duration could be prolonged by introducing ionic remodeling.10 Additionally, we found that ionic remodeling through 25%, 25%, and 35% reductions of the normal conductance values of gto, gKur, and gCa,L, respectively, as suggested in Courtemanche et al,4 shortened the APD at the cellular level, shortened the wavelength of the activation wave, and led to a prolonged duration of AFL/AF for >10 seconds.
Study Limitations
Electrophysiological studies on PVs have revealed that many factors such as specialized conduction cells, abnormal Ca2+ regulation, and the autonomic nervous system could contribute to PV arrhythmogenic activity. However, the purpose of the present study was not to investigate generating mechanisms for ectopic beats. Thus, we did not incorporate such effects in our modeling studies of AFL/AF. In fact, the rapid pacing scheme used here enabled us to flexibly pick the site of an ectopic focus and vary the coupling interval of the foci relative to the sinus beat and the firing cycle length. Furthermore, recent observations have shown that whether atrial tachyarrhythmias were induced by rapid pacing or spontaneously initiated, their properties were indistinguishable.26
Conclusion
We have found that interactions between atrial structure, site of stimulation, and stimulus timing created dynamic dispersion of repolarization and conduction block that cause reentrant AFL/AF. Our findings show that a single focus can initiate different reentrant AFL circuits and suggest a mechanism whereby the atria are more vulnerable to premature beats that originate in the PVs than the RA.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by American Heart Association Heritage Affiliate fellowship award 0525855T (Dr Gong), the Kenny Gordon Foundation, the National Science Foundation grant PHY-0513389 (Dr Christini), and the Maurice and Corrine Greenberg Arrhythmia Research Grant (Dr Lerman).
Disclosures
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Wazni O, Marrouche NF, Martin DO, Gillinov AM, Saliba W, Saad E, Klein A, Bhargava M, Bash D, Schweikert R, Erciyes D, Abdul-Karim A, Brachman J, Gunther J, Pisano E, Potenza D, Fanelli R, Natale A. Randomized study comparing combined pulmonary veinleft atrial junction disconnection and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation versus pulmonary veinleft atrial junction disconnection alone in patients presenting with typical atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003; 108: 24792483.
3. Narayan SM, Bode F, Karasik PL, Franz MR. Alternans of atrial action potentials during atrial flutter as a precursor to atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2002; 106: 19681973.
4. Courtemanche M, Ramirez RJ, Nattel S. Ionic mechanisms underlying human atrial action potential properties: insights from a mathematical model. Am J Physiol. 1998; 275: H301H321.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Koumi S, Backer C, Arentzen C. Characterization of inwardly rectifying K+ channel in human cardiac myocytes. Circulation. 1995; 92: 164174.
6. Hiromoto K, Shimizu H, Furukawa Y, Kanemori T, Mine T, Masuyama T, Ohyanagi M. Discordant repolarization alternans-induced atrial fibrillation is suppressed by verapamil. Circ J. 2005; 69: 13681373.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Cox JL, Canavan TE, Schuessler RB, Cain ME, Lindsay BD, Stone C, Smith PK, Corr PB, Boineau JP. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation, II: intraoperative electrophysiologic mapping and description of the electrophysiologic basis of atrial-flutter and atrial-fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991; 101: 406426.[Abstract]
8. Jacquemet V, Virag N, Ihara Z, Dang L, Blanc O, Zozor S, Vesin JM, Kappenberger L, Henriquez C. Study of unipolar electrogram morphology in a computer model of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003; 14: S172S179.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Xie F, Qu Z, Garfinkel A, Weiss JN. Electrical refractory period restitution and spiral wave reentry in simulated cardiac tissue. Am J Physiol. 2002; 283: H448H460.
10. Virag N, Jacquemet V, Henriquez C, Zozor S, Blanc O, Vesin JM, Pruvot E, Kappenberg L. Study of atrial arrhythmias in a computer model based on magnetic resonance images of human atria. Chaos. 2002; 12: 754763.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Xie F, Qu Z, Yang J, Baher A, Weiss JN, Garfinkel A. A simulation study of the effects of cardiac anatomy in ventricular fibrillation. J Clin Invest. 2004; 113: 686693.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Harrild DM, Henriquez CS. A computer model of normal conduction in the human atria. Circ Res. 2000; 87: e25e36.
13. Lemery R, Soucie L, Martin B, Tang ASL, Green M, Healey J. Human study of biatrial electrical coupling: determinants of endocardial septal activation and conduction over interatrial connections. Circulation. 2004; 110: 20832089.
14. Qu Z, Garfinkel A, Chen PS, Weiss JN. Mechanisms of discordant alternans and induction of reentry in simulated cardiac tissue. Circulation. 2000; 102: 16641670.
15. Cheng J, Cabeen WR, Scheinman M. Right atrial flutter due to lower loop reentry: mechanism and anatomic substrate. Circulation. 1999; 99: 17001705.
16. Fujiki A, Nishida K, Sakabe M, Sugao M, Tsuneda T, Mizumaki K, Inoue H. Entrainment mapping of dual-loop macroreentry in common atrial flutter: new insights into the atrial flutter circuit. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15: 679685.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Jalife J, Berenfeld O, Mansour M. Mother rotors and fibrillatory conduction: a mechanism of atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 54: 204216.
18. Allessie MA, Lammers WEJP, Bonke FIM, Hollen J. Experimental evaluation of Moes multiple wavelet hypothesis of atrial fibrillation. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias. Orlando, Fla: Grune & Stratton; 1985; 265275.
19. Kim BS, Kim YH, Hwang GS, Pak HN, Lee SC, Shim WJ, Oh DJ, Ro YM. Action potential duration restitution kinetics in human atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 13291336.
20. Saksena S, Skadsberg ND, Rao HB, Filipecki A. Biatrial and three-dimensional mapping of spontaneous atrial arrhythmias in patients with refractory atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16: 494504.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Ramanna H, Bakker JMTD, Elvan A, Hauer RNW. On the atrial response to focal discharges in man. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15: 629636.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Jais P, Shah DC, Haissaguerre M, Hocini M, Peng JT, Takahashi A, Garrigue S, Metayer PL, Clementy J. Mapping and ablation of left atrial flutters. Circulation. 2000; 101: 29282934.
23. Friedman PA, Luria D, Fenton AM, Munger TM, Jahangir A, Shen WK, Rea RF, Stanton MS, Hammill SC, Packer DL. Global right atrial mapping of human atrial flutter: the presence of posteromedial (sinus venosa region) functional block and double potentials: a study in biplane fluoroscopy and intracardiac echocardiography. Circulation. 2000; 6: 15681577.
24. Jensen TJ, Haarbo J, Pehrson SM, Thomsen B. Impact of premature atrial contractions in atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004; 27: 447452.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Capucci A, Santarelli A, Boriani G, Magnani B. Atrial premature beats coupling interval determines lone paroxysmal atrial-fibrillation onset. Int J Cardiol. 1992; 36: 8793.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Wollmann CG, Birnie D, Tang A, Boriani G, Kuhl M, Bocker D. Comparison of induced and spontaneous atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with a history of spontaneous atrial tachyarrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16: 818822.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
| Footnotes |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-T. Tsai, L.-P. Lai, J.-J. Hwang, J.-L. Lin, and F.-T. Chiang Molecular Genetics of Atrial Fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 22, 2008; 52(4): 241 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Zemlin and A. M. Pertsov Bradycardic onset of spiral wave re-entry: structural substrates Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(suppl_6): vi59 - vi63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |