This Article Free upon publication Extract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 115/13/e356    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.107.182882v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Christenson, R. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Christenson, R. H. Related Collections Other heart failure AHA Statements and Guidelines Acute coronary syndromes

(Circulation. 2007;115:e356-e375.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Special Report

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical Characteristics and Utilization of Biochemical Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes

NACB WRITING GROUP MEMBERS; David A. Morrow¹; Christopher P. Cannon¹; Robert L. Jesse²; L. Kristin Newby³; Jan Ravkilde⁴; Alan B. Storrow⁵; Alan H.B. Wu⁶; Robert H. Christenson^7,*

	Introduction

Top Introduction I. Overview of the... II. Use of Biochemical... III. Use of Biochemical... B. Biochemical Marker... IV. Use of Biochemical... V. References

 

I. OVERVIEW OF THE ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME...e357

   A. Definition of Terms...e357

   B. Pathogenesis and Management of ACS...e357

II. USE OF BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS IN THE INITIAL EVALUATION OF ACS...e358

   A. Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction...e358

1.       Biochemical Markers of Myocardial Necrosis...e358
   
2.       Optimal Timing of Sample Acquisition...e359
   
3.       Criteria for Diagnosis of MI...e360
   
4.       4. Additional Considerations in the Use of Biomarkers for Diagnosis of MI...e360
   

   B. Early Risk Stratification...e361

1.       Biochemical Markers of Cardiac Injury...e361

            a. Pathophysiology...e361
   

            b. Relationship to Clinical Outcomes...e361
   

            c. Decision-Limits...e362
   

            d. Therapeutic Decision-Making...e362
   

   
   
2.       Natriuretic Peptides...e362

            a. Pathophysiology...e362
   

            b. Relationship to Clinical Outcomes...e363
   

            c. Decision-Limits...e364
   

            d. Therapeutic Decision-Making...e365
   

   
   
3.       Biochemical Markers of Inflammation...e365

            a. Pathophysiology...e365
   

            b. Relationship to Clinical Outcomes...e365
   

            c. Decision-Limits...e365
   

            d. Therapeutic Decision-Making...e367
   

   
   
4.       Biochemical Markers of Ischemia...e367
   
5.       Multimarker Approach...e367
   
6.       Other Novel Markers...e368
   

III. USE OF BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NSTEACS...e368

   A. Clinical Decision-Making...e368

1.       Biochemical Markers of Cardiac Injury...e368
   
2.       Other Biochemical Markers...e369
   

   B. Biochemical Marker Measurement After the Initial Diagnosis...e369

IV. USE OF BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF STEMI...e370

   A. Noninvasive Assessment of Reperfusion...e370

   B. Biochemical Marker Measurement After the Diagnosis of Acute MI...e370

V. REFERENCES...e371

	I. Overview of the Acute Coronary Syndrome

Top Introduction I. Overview of the... II. Use of Biochemical... III. Use of Biochemical... B. Biochemical Marker... IV. Use of Biochemical... V. References

 
A. Definition of Terms
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS)⁸ refers to a constellation of clinical symptoms caused by acute myocardial ischemia^1,2. Owing to their higher risk for cardiac death or ischemic complications, patients with ACS must be identified among the estimated 8 million patients with nontraumatic chest symptoms presenting for emergency evaluation each year in the US³. In practice, the terms suspected or possible ACS are often used by medical personnel early in the process of evaluation to describe patients for whom the symptom complex is consistent with ACS but the diagnosis has not yet been conclusively established¹.

Patients with ACS are subdivided into 2 major categories based on the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) at presentation (Fig. 1): those with new ST-segment elevation on the ECG that is diagnostic of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and those who present with ST-segment depression, T-wave changes, or no ECG abnormalities (non–ST elevation ACS, NSTEACS). The latter term (NSTEACS) encompasses both unstable angina and non–ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This terminology has evolved along clinical lines based on a major divergence in the therapeutic approach to STEMI vs NSTEACS (see section IB). Unstable angina and NSTEMI are considered to be closely related conditions, sharing a common pathogenesis and clinical presentation but differing in severity¹. Specifically, NSTEMI is distinguished from unstable angina by ischemia sufficiently severe in intensity and duration to cause irreversible myocardial damage (myocyte necrosis), recognized clinically by the detection of biomarkers of myocardial injury⁴.

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Categorization of acute coronary syndromes.

B. Pathogenesis and Management
It is important to recognize that ACS is a complex syndrome with a heterogeneous etiology, analogous to anemia or hypertension⁵. Nevertheless, the most common cause is atherosclerotic coronary artery disease with erosion or rupture of atherosclerotic plaque, exposing the highly procoagulant contents of the atheroma core to circulating platelets and coagulation proteins, and culminating in formation of intracoronary thrombus^6–8. In the majority of patients presenting with ACS, the thrombus is partially obstructive, or only transiently occlusive, resulting in coronary ischemia without persistent ST-segment elevation (unstable angina or NSTEMI). In the remaining 30% of patients with ACS⁹, the intracoronary thrombus completely occludes the culprit vessel, resulting in STEMI. Antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapies aimed at halting the propagation or recurrence of coronary thrombus are central to management of the majority of patients across the entire spectrum of ACS^1,2,10. The subgroup of patients with STEMI consists of candidates for immediate reperfusion therapy with either fibrinolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention¹⁰. In contrast, fibrinolysis appears to be harmful in patients with NSTEACS^1,11.

Including the most common etiology of ACS described above, 5 principal causes have been described: (¹) plaque rupture with acute thrombosis; (2) progressive mechanical obstruction; (3) inflammation; (4) secondary unstable angina (e.g., due to severe anemia or hyperthyroidism); and (5) dynamic obstruction (coronary vasoconstriction)¹². It is rare that any of these contributors exists in isolation. Because patients with ACS vary substantially with respect to the mixture of contributions from each of these major mechanisms, and, as such, are likely to benefit from different therapeutic approaches, characterization of the dominant contributors for an individual patient can be valuable in guiding their care¹². With the emergence of newer biomarkers that reflect the diverse pathobiology of acute ischemic heart disease, their use as noninvasive means to gain insight into the underlying causes and consequences of ACS is being investigated¹³.

Commensurate with the heterogeneous pathobiology of ACS, the risk of subsequent death and/or recurrent ischemic events also varies widely. As a result, effective risk stratification and targeting of therapy is a focus of contemporary clinical management of this condition^14,15. In addition, among patients with definite ACS, early treatment may reduce the extent of myocardial injury; therefore, rapid diagnosis and initiation of therapy is also a central tenet of management¹. It follows that the objectives of the initial evaluation of patients with nontraumatic chest pain are 2-fold: (a) to assess the probability that the patient’s symptoms are related to acute coronary ischemia; and (b) to assess the patient’s risk of recurrent cardiac events, including death and recurrent ischemia¹. When applied in conjunction with the clinical history, physical examination, and interpretation of the ECG, cardiac biomarkers are valuable in achieving both of these objectives.

	II. Use of Biochemical Markers in the Initial Evaluation of ACS

Top Introduction I. Overview of the... II. Use of Biochemical... III. Use of Biochemical... B. Biochemical Marker... IV. Use of Biochemical... V. References

 
A. Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction

Recommendations for Use of Biochemical Markers for Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction (MI)

Class I

1. Biomarkers of myocardial necrosis should be measured in all patients who present with symptoms consistent with ACS (Level of Evidence: C).
   
2. The patient’s clinical presentation (history, physical exam) and ECG should be used in conjunction with biomarkers in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected MI (Level of Evidence: C).
   
3. Cardiac troponin is the preferred marker for the diagnosis of MI. Creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) by mass assay is an acceptable alternative when cardiac troponin is not available (Level of Evidence: A).
   
4. Blood should be obtained for testing at hospital presentation followed by serial sampling with timing of sampling based on the clinical circumstances. For most patients, blood should be obtained for testing at hospital presentation and at 6–9 h (Level of Evidence: C).
   
5. In the presence of a clinical history suggestive of ACS, the following are considered indicative of myocardial necrosis consistent with MI (Level of Evidence: C):

      a. Maximal concentration of cardiac troponin exceeding the 99th percentile of values (with optimal precision defined by total CV <10%) for a reference control group on at least 1 occasion during the first 24 h after the clinical event (observation of a rise and/or fall in values is useful in discriminating the timing of injury).
   

      b. Maximal concentration of CK-MB exceeding the 99th percentile of values for a sex-specific reference control group on 2 successive samples (values for CK-MB should rise and/or fall).
   

   
   

Class IIb

1. For patients who present within 6 h of the onset of symptoms, an early marker of myocardial necrosis may be considered in addition to a cardiac troponin. Myoglobin is the most extensively studied marker for this purpose (Level of Evidence: B).
   
2. A rapid "rule-in" protocol with frequent early sampling of markers of myocardial necrosis maybe appropriate if tied to therapeutic strategies (Level of Evidence: C).
   

Class III

1. Total CK, CK-MB activity, aspartate aminotransferase (AST, SGOT), ß-hydroxybutyric dehydrogenase, and/or lactate dehydrogenase should not be used as biomarkers for the diagnosis of MI (Level of Evidence: C).
   
2. For patients with diagnostic ECG abnormalities on presentation (e.g., new ST-segment elevation), diagnosis and treatment should not be delayed while awaiting biomarker results (Level of Evidence: C).
   

1. Biochemical Markers of Myocardial Necrosis
Myocardial necrosis is accompanied by the release of structural proteins and other intracellular macromolecules into the cardiac interstitium as a consequence of compromise of the integrity of cellular membranes. These biomarkers of myocardial necrosis include cardiac troponin I and T (cTnI and cTnT), CK, myoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, and others (Table 1). On the basis of improved sensitivity and superior tissue-specificity compared with the other available biomarkers of necrosis, cardiac troponin is the preferred biomarker for the detection of myocardial injury. The diagnosis of acute, evolving, or recent MI requires (in the absence of pathologic confirmation) findings of a typical rise and/or fall of a biomarker of necrosis, in conjunction with clinical evidence (symptoms, or ECG) that the cause of myocardial damage is ischemia. Because recognition of acute MI is important to prognosis and therapy, measurement of biomarkers of necrosis is indicated in all patients with suspected ACS. Important characteristics of these biomarkers are discussed in the remainder of this section.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Properties of biomarkers of myocardial necrosis.

In contrast to CK, cTnI and cTnT have isoforms that are unique to cardiac myocytes and may be measured by assays employing monoclonal antibodies specific to epitopes of the cardiac form^16–19. The advantage of cardiac troponin over other biomarkers of necrosis has been firmly established in clinical studies. Testing for cardiac troponin is associated with fewer false-positive results in the setting of concomitant skeletal muscle injury, e.g., after trauma or surgery^16,20,21 and also provides superior discrimination of myocardial injury when the concentration of CK-MB is normal or minimally increased^16,22,23. Moreover, the association between an increased concentration of cardiac troponin and a higher risk of recurrent cardiac events in patients with normal serum concentration of CK-MB and suspected ACS has confirmed the clinical relevance of detecting circulating troponin in patients previously classified with unstable angina. An example from one of several studies is shown in Fig. 2^24–26.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Risk of death and recurrent ischemic events among patients with NSTEACS and normal serial CK-MB with and without increase baseline concentration of cardiac troponin I (Dimension RxL, Dade Behring). As discussed in section II-B1.c, the cut point applied in this study is specific to the assay used. Data from Morrow et al.67. UR, urgent revascularization prompted by recurrent ischemia.

When cardiac troponin is not available, the next best alternative is CK-MB (measured by mass assay). Although total CK is a sensitive marker of myocardial damage, it has poor specificity due to its high concentration in skeletal muscle. By virtue of its greater concentration in cardiac vs skeletal myocytes, the MB isoenzyme of CK offers an improvement in sensitivity and specificity compared with total CK. Nevertheless, CK-MB constitutes 1%–3% of the CK in skeletal muscle, and is present in minor quantities in intestine, diaphragm, uterus, and prostate. Therefore, the specificity of CK-MB may be impaired in the setting of major injury to these organs, especially skeletal muscle. Serial measurements documenting the characteristic rise and/or fall are important to maintaining specificity for the diagnosis of acute MI. Alternatives to cardiac injury should be sought when CK-MB is increased in the presence of a troponin concentration below the 99th percentile. Assays for CK-MB mass offer superior analytical and diagnostic performance and thus are strongly preferred to assays for CK-MB activity (see Analytical Issues for Biomarkers in ACS in separate guidelines).

Although they are of historical significance, total CK, lactate dehydrogenase, and aspartate aminotransferase should no longer be used for the diagnosis of MI because they have low specificity for cardiac injury and more specific alternative biomarkers of necrosis are available. Myoglobin shares limitations with these markers due to its high concentration in skeletal muscle. However, because of its small molecular size and consequent rapid rise in the setting of myocardial necrosis, it has retained value as a very early marker of MI. Clinical studies have shown that the combined use of myoglobin and a more specific marker of myocardial necrosis (cardiac troponin or CK-MB) may be useful for the early exclusion of MI^27,28. Multimarker strategies that include myoglobin have been shown to identify patients with MI more rapidly than laboratory-based determination of a single marker^29,30. However, this potential advantage of myoglobin may be diminished with use of contemporary decision-limits and improving sensitivity of newer troponin assays³¹. CK-MB subforms may also be used as an early rising indicator of MI³² but are not used today, as there are no commercial platforms available.

2. Optimal Timing of Sample Acquisition
The optimal timing of sample acquisition for measurement of biomarkers for the diagnosis of MI derives from both properties of the available biomarkers and patient-related factors (timing and duration of symptoms relative to presentation and overall probability of ACS). CK-MB begins to rise within 3–4 h after the onset of myocardial injury and falls to normal ranges by 48–72 h (Fig. 3). Cardiac troponin rises with a time course similar to CK-MB but can remain increased for up to 4–7 days for cTnI and 10–14 days for cTnT. The initial release of cardiac troponin that exists in the cellular cytosol (3%–8%) followed by the slower dispersion of troponin from degrading cardiac myofilaments is responsible for this extended kinetic profile³³. In contrast, myoglobin concentration begins to rise as early as 1 h after onset of myocyte damage and returns to normal within 12–24 h.

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Temporal release of myoglobin, CK-MB, cTnI and cTnT. With permission, from Christenson RH, Azzazy HME. Biomarkers of necrosis: past, present and future. In Morrow DA, ed. Cardiovascular Biomarkers: Pathophysiology and Clinical Management. New York: Humana Press, 2006.

By virtue of these kinetics, the temporal rise of the serum concentration of CK-MB and cardiac troponin typically does not permit detection of myocardial necrosis very early (1–3 h) and does not support maximal sensitivity of these markers until 6 or more hours after the onset of MI^34–36. Accurate determination of the timing of symptom onset is based on patient reporting and is often clinically very challenging¹⁰. Therefore, for most patients, blood should be obtained for testing at hospital presentation and at 6–9 h after presentation (unless the timing of symptoms is reliably known) to provide adequate clinical sensitivity for detecting MI. Given improvements in the analytic performance of troponin assays, testing up to 6–9 h after symptom onset is expected to deliver optimal sensitivity in most patients. However, in patients for whom these initial samples are negative and there is an intermediate or high clinical index of suspicion, or in whom plausibly ischemic symptoms have recurred, repeat testing at 12–24 h should be considered. Among patients without ST elevation, such serial testing increases the proportion of patients with myocardial injury who are detected from 49% to 68% at 8 h and enhances the accuracy of risk assessment³⁷. More frequent early testing of cardiac troponin and/or CK-MB, particularly in combination with myoglobin, may be considered as an approach to increase early detection of infarction and to facilitate rapid initiation of treatment^38,39. This strategy has also shown value in some studies for expedited exclusion of MI⁴⁰, as has use of the change in markers of necrosis repeated over an interval of 2 h^41,42.

3. Criteria for Diagnosis of MI
Detection of increased blood concentrations of biomarkers of myocardial necrosis in the setting of a clinical syndrome consistent with myocardial ischemia is necessary for the diagnosis of acute, evolving, or recent MI. Clinical information from the history and ECG must be integrated with data from measurement of biomarkers in determining whether the myocardial necrosis manifested by increased concentration of these markers is due to myocardial ischemia or some other cause^4,43. The tissue specificity of cardiac troponin should not be confused with specificity for the mechanism of injury (e.g., MI vs myocarditis)^44,45. When an increased value is encountered in the absence of evidence of myocardial ischemia, a careful search for other possible etiologies of cardiac damage should be undertaken.

An increased concentration of cardiac troponin is defined as exceeding the 99th percentile of a reference control group. Recommendations regarding analytic evaluation and performance are described in separate guidelines (see Analytical Issues for Biomarkers in ACS). A maximal concentration of cardiac troponin exceeding this decision-limit on at least 1 occasion during the index clinical event is indicative of myocardial necrosis. Similarly, the diagnostic limit for CK-MB is defined as the 99th percentile (with acceptable imprecision) in a sex-specific reference control group. In light of the lower tissue specificity compared with troponin, it is recommended that in most situations 2 consecutive measurements of CK-MB above this decision-limit are required to be considered sufficient biochemical evidence of myocardial necrosis. Use of total CK for diagnosis of MI is not recommended. However, in the absence of availability of data using a troponin or CK-MB assay (mass or activity), when only total CK values are available, the recommended decision-limit is >2 times the sex-specific upper reference limit. A rise and/or fall of CK-MB or total CK provides additional evidence supporting the diagnosis of acute MI. In addition, for values of cardiac troponin between the 10% CV and the 99th percentile, as well as for potential chronic elevations (e.g., renal failure), the use of a rising and/or falling pattern is often useful in facilitating the discrimination of patients with acute events.

4. Additional Considerations in the Use of Biomarkers for Diagnosis of MI
The criteria for MI recommended in these and other guidelines⁴ are based on the principle that any reliably detected myocardial necrosis, if caused by myocardial ischemia, constitutes an MI. The development of more sensitive and specific biomarkers of necrosis, such as cardiac troponin, has enabled detection of quantitatively much smaller areas of myocardial injury⁴⁶. Moreover, it is likely that future generations of assays for cardiac troponin will push this limit even lower. Elegant histologic work in animal models of coronary ischemia has provided strong evidence that release of CK from cardiac myocytes occurs in setting of myocyte necrosis but not in the setting of reversible myocyte injury. In contrast, data in this regard for cardiac troponin have been mixed⁴⁷. Increased concentrations of cTnI and cTnT have been observed in animal models of ischemia without histologic evidence of irreversible cellular injury⁴⁸. Whereas the potential to miss small amounts of patchy necrosis during microscopic examination is a significant limitation of all such experimental results, it is also possible that such release of cardiac troponin into the circulation may result from reversible injury to the myocyte cellular membrane leading to egress of troponin residing in the cytosol⁴⁹. Nevertheless, based on the aggregate evidence to date, the present guidelines reflect the prevailing consensus opinion⁴³ that any reliably detected elevation of a cardiac troponin is abnormal and most likely represents necrosis. The committee supports additional investigation to determine whether current or future generations of assays for cardiac troponin may detect release of the protein that occurs during reversible injury due to ischemia without infarction.

Measurement of more than 1 specific biomarker of myocardial necrosis (e.g., cardiac troponin and CK-MB) is not necessary for establishing the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and is not recommended. The use of serial measurements of CK-MB to provide information during the management of MI after diagnosis is discussed in Section IV-B. Determination of an early marker of necrosis in combination with cardiac troponin may be appropriate in some circumstances as described in Section II-A1.

Despite the central role for biomarkers of necrosis in establishing the diagnosis of acute MI, other diagnostic tools remain vital to clinical care. In particular, acute ST-segment elevation on the ECG in conjunction with a consistent clinical syndrome has a very high positive predictive value for acute STEMI and should prompt initiation of appropriate strategies for coronary reperfusion¹⁰. Patients presenting within 6 h of symptom onset may not yet have a detectable serum concentration of biomarkers of necrosis. However, given the critical relationship between rapid therapy and outcomes in patients with STEMI, therapy should not be delayed waiting for confirmatory biomarker measurements.

B. Early Risk Stratification

Recommendations for Use of Biochemical Markers for Risk Stratification in ACS

Class I

1. Patients with suspected ACS should undergo early risk stratification based on an integrated assessment of symptoms, physical exam findings, ECG findings, and biomarkers (Level of Evidence: C).
   
2. A cardiac troponin is the preferred marker for risk stratification and, if available, should be measured in all patients with suspected ACS. In patients with a clinical syndrome consistent with ACS, a maximal (peak) concentration exceeding the 99th percentile of values for a reference control group should be considered indicative of increased risk of death and recurrent ischemic events (Level of Evidence: A).
   
3. Blood should be obtained for testing on hospital presentation followed by serial sampling with timing of sampling based on the clinical circumstances. For most patients, blood should be obtained for testing at hospital presentation and at 6–9 h (Level of Evidence: B).
   

Class IIa

1. Measurement of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) may be useful, in addition to a cardiac troponin, for risk assessment in patients with a clinical syndrome consistent with ACS. The benefits of therapy based on this strategy remain uncertain (Level of Evidence: A).
   
2. Measurement of brain-type (B-type) natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) may be useful, in addition to a cardiac troponin, for risk assessment in patients with a clinical syndrome consistent with ACS. The benefits of therapy based on this strategy remain uncertain (Level of Evidence: A).
   

Class IIb

1. Measurement of markers of myocardial ischemia, in addition to cardiac troponin and ECG, may aid in excluding ACS in patients with a low clinical probability of myocardial ischemia (Level of Evidence: C).
   
2. A multimarker strategy that includes measurement of 2 or more pathobiologically diverse biomarkers in addition to a cardiac troponin may aid in enhancing risk stratification in patients with a clinical syndrome consistent with ACS. BNP and hs-CRP are the biomarkers best studied using this approach. The benefits of therapy based on this strategy remain uncertain (Level of Evidence: C).
   
3. Early repeat sampling of cardiac troponin (e.g., 2–4 h after presentation) may be appropriate if tied to therapeutic strategies (Level of Evidence: C).
   

Class III
Biomarkers of necrosis should not be used for routine screening of patients with low clinical probability of ACS (Level of Evidence: C).

1. Biochemical Markers of Cardiac Injury
A. Pathophysiology
The presence of cardiac troponin in the peripheral circulation is indicative of myocardial injury (see Section II-A1). Additional pathophysiologic correlates of troponin elevation have been identified in clinical studies of ACS. Angiographic data from trials enrolling patients with NSTEACS have shown increased concentrations of troponin to be associated with greater lesion complexity and severity, more frequent visible thrombus, and more severely impaired blood flow in the culprit artery^50–53. In addition, an increased concentration of troponin is associated with impaired myocardial tissue or "microvascular" perfusion and thus hypothesized to reflect embolization of platelet aggregates into the distal coronary artery⁵². Furthermore, increased concentrations of troponin have been associated with a higher likelihood of poor outcomes during angioplasty, including very slow flow (so-called "no reflow") despite a patent epicardial artery in a clinical syndrome believed to result from distal microvascular obstruction⁵⁴. Advances in the understanding of the pathobiology of ACS have pointed toward these phenomena of microembolization and microvascular obstruction as important mediators of adverse outcomes⁵⁵. As such, the apparent link between microembolization and release of cardiac troponin may underlie, at least in part, the strong association between this biomarker and subsequent recurrent clinical events⁵².

B. Relationship to Clinical Outcomes
The presence of myocardial necrosis detectable with creatine kinase is established as an important prognostic factor in the assessment of patients with ACS⁵⁶. In addition, the blood concentration of biomarkers of necrosis shows a consistent graded relationship with the risk of short- and long-term mortality^57,58. Specifically, among patients with NSTEACS, the concentration of CK-MB at hospital presentation establishes a gradient of 30-day mortality risk from 1.8% in patients with CK-MB less than the upper limit of the reference interval to 3.3% for those with a 1- to 2-fold increase above the upper limit of the reference interval, to 8.3% among those with >10-fold increase⁵⁸. The availability of cardiac troponin has extended the spectrum of detectable myocardial injury and further enhanced the clinician’s ability to assess risk²⁴. Based on evidence from more than 26 studies, including both clinical trials and observational studies from community-based cohorts, cardiac troponin has proven to be a potent independent indicator of the risk of death and recurrent ischemic events among patients presenting with ACS²⁶. In aggregate, the available data indicate an 4-fold higher risk of death and recurrent MI among patients presenting with suspected NSTEACS and an increased concentration of troponin compared with patients with a normal troponin result (Fig. 4)^26,59,60. In patients with STEMI, an increased concentration of troponin at presentation is also associated with significantly higher short-term mortality^61,62.

View larger version (8K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Risk of death or MI stratified by troponin result in patients with suspected ACS. Adapted with permission from Braunwald E, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:970–1062.

The prognostic information obtained from measurement of cardiac troponin is independent of and complementary to other important clinical indicators of risk including patient age, ST deviation, and presence of heart failure^{57,61,63–66}. The higher risk of patients presenting with an increased concentration of troponin is also evident among patients with normal concentrations of CK-MB⁶⁷. As such, cardiac troponin is the preferred biomarker for risk assessment in patients presenting with suspected ACS. cTnI and cTnT appear to have similar value for risk assessment in ACS^26,68.

C. Decision-Limits
As the lower limits of detection (LLD) have decreased with incremental improvements in commercially available assays for cardiac troponin, the potential prognostic implications of quantitatively modest ("low-level") increases in cardiac troponin have attained greater clinical relevance. The consensus recommendation is that the upper limit of normal for cardiac troponin and CK-MB be defined by the 99th percentile among a reference control population⁶⁹. Details regarding the determination of this cut point and analytic performance of the assay are discussed elsewhere in these guidelines (see Analytical Issues for Biomarkers in ACS).

When conducted among patients with a compelling clinical history suggesting ACS (e.g., in clinical trials of ACS), prospective analyses have documented that troponin concentrations at the low end of the detectable range are associated with higher risk of recurrent cardiac events than patients without detectable troponin^66,70. For example, in the Treatment with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS)-TIMI 18 study, patients with a baseline concentration of cTnI in the range immediately above the 99th percentile for the assay used in the study (0.1 µg/L, CV 20%) were at more than 3-fold higher risk of death or recurrent MI than those with cTnI <0.1 µg/L⁶⁶. This observation of the prognostic significance of low-level increase of cardiac troponin has been independently confirmed using another assay for cTnI in 2 separate data sets from clinical trials (OPUS-TIMI 16 and FRISC II)^70,71, as well as within a community-based study⁷². Specifically, in the latter, patients presenting with chest pain were stratified into 4 groups according to peak cTnI concentration—negative (<LLD), low (LLD to <99th percentile, 10%CV), intermediate (99th percentile, 10%CV to < manufacturer’s suggested diagnostic limit for MI), and high ( suggested diagnostic limit for MI)—revealing a 6-month mortality rate that increased in a stepwise fashion compared with patients with negative cTnI results [hazard ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4–4.4] in the low cTnI group, 3.9 (95% CI 2.3–6.8) in the intermediate cTnI group, and 6.1 (95% CI 4.2–8.7) in the high cTnI group (Fig. 5)⁷². With future improvements in the analytic performance of available assays, the association between troponin concentrations at the lower limit of detection and outcomes in ACS will require continued careful evaluation.

View larger version (7K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Prognostic implication of low-level troponin elevation in patients with chest pain suspicious for ACS. Data from Kontos, et al.72. URL, upper reference limit supplied by manufacturer.

D. Therapeutic Decision-Making
The application of cardiac troponin to guide specific therapeutic choices for patients with ACS is well studied and is discussed in section IIIA.

2. Natriuretic Peptides
A. Pathophysiology
BNP and NT-proBNP are released from cardiac myocytes in response to increases in ventricular wall stress⁷³. Wall stress in a chamber is directly related to the diameter of the chamber and the transmural pressure and inversely related to the thickness of the wall. Therefore, increases both in the diameter of and pressure within the left ventricle during remodeling after a transmural infarction, or as a consequence of prior ischemic damage, may contribute to elevation of natriuretic peptides observed in patients with acute MI. In addition, impairment of ventricular relaxation and consequent nonsystolic ventricular dysfunction is one of the earliest consequences of myocardial ischemia, preceding angina and ST-segment deviation. This well-described pathophysiology, together with a strong relationship between BNP and NT-proBNP with mortality in patients with unstable angina (see below), has supported the hypothesis that myocardial ischemia can also elicit the release of BNP in absence of necrosis⁷⁴.

The concept that ischemia may be an important stimulus for BNP synthesis and release is supported by several lines of evidence. In experimental models of myocardial infarction, BNP gene transcription is increased both in infarcted tissue and in the surrounding ischemic but viable myocardium⁷⁵. Hypoxia has also been shown to trigger release of BNP⁷⁶. BNP rises early after exercise in patients with coronary disease, and the magnitude of BNP increase is proportional to the size of the ischemic territory as assessed with nuclear single-photon emission computed tomography imaging⁷⁷. After uncomplicated coronary angioplasty, BNP transiently increases even when cardiac filling pressures remain unchanged⁷⁸. Together, these data provide a plausible basis to explain the strong association between BNP and NT-proBNP with mortality in patients with unstable angina and normal left ventricular systolic function.

B. Relationship to Clinical Outcomes
In aggregate there are now more than 10 studies showing a strong association between BNP or NT-proBNP and outcomes in patients with ACS (Table 2)^79–89. After presentation with transmural infarction, the plasma concentration of BNP rises rapidly and peaks at 24 h, with the peak concentration proportional to the size of the MI^90,91. In some patients, particularly those who eventually develop severe heart failure, a second peak may occur after 5 days, likely reflecting the development of adverse ventricular remodeling⁹². In patients with acute MI, a higher concentration of BNP and NT-proBNP have been shown to predict a greater likelihood of death or heart failure, independent of other prognostic variables including left ventricular ejection fraction^{80,81,83,93,94}. BNP and NT-proBNP are also increased in high-risk patients with unstable angina^83,84,95. When measured a median of 40 h after presentation in 1600 patients with NSTEACS, a highly significant graded relationship between the concentration of BNP and subsequent risk of short- and long-term mortality was evident⁸³. The rate of death increased from <1% among patients with BNP concentrations in the lowest quartile to 15% in those with a BNP concentration in the highest quartile (P < 0.0001)⁸³. This finding has been corroborated in multiple studies of both BNP^83,84 and NT-proBNP^85,86,89, including substudies of clinical trials and observational data from community-based cohorts (Fig. 6).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. Summary of clinical studies of BNP and NT-proBNP in ACS.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Risk of death in patients with NSTEAC syndrome stratified by quartile of concentration of NT-proBNP (Elecsys 2010, Roche Diagnostics) at baseline. With permission from James et al.89.

Although the plasma concentration of BNP and NT-proBNP in ACS is associated with older age, female sex, renal insufficiency, left ventricular dysfunction, clinical evidence of heart failure, presence of myocardial necrosis, and more severe angiographic coronary artery disease, the prognostic relationship between the biomarkers and mortality is independent of these other clinical risk indicators^87,96. Importantly, BNP and NT-proBNP identify patients without systolic dysfunction or signs of heart failure who are at higher risk of death and heart failure and provide prognostic information that is complementary to cardiac troponin^84,89.

C. Decision-Limits
When evaluated in ACS, serum concentrations of BNP and NT-proBNP have a graded relationship with risk for short- and long-term mortality^84,89. As such, the absolute plasma concentration of BNP or NT-proBNP carries information with respect to the magnitude of risk, and thus should be considered by the clinician. Nevertheless, for convenient clinical use, a decision-limit of 80 pg/mL has been validated in patients with high clinical suspicion for ACS using 2 BNP assays and may be used for assays that are similarly calibrated (Fig. 7)⁸⁴. An evidence-based approach with specific assays studied and validated in clinical studies is thus possible. However, results for specific cut points may not be extrapolated to other assays. NT-proBNP has also been evaluated in clinical studies; cut points have been individually derived within each study, and no specific cut point has yet undergone separate validation in patients with ACS. The committee encourages additional investigation prospectively evaluating the optimal decision-limits for BNP and NT-proBNP in ACS, including evaluation of an approach that incorporates more than one decision-limit to stratify patients into low, intermediate, and high risk, as well as assessment of the need for age- and sex-related decision-limits in ACS. It is possible that different decision-limits should be applied for risk stratification in ACS compared with diagnostic assessment of the patient with shortness of breath, and that the prognostic decision-limits in ACS will be refined when studied in more heterogeneous patient populations presenting with suspected ACS. A detailed discussion of analytic issues that may impact the selection and reporting of decision limits for BNP and NT-proBNP is presented in separate guidelines (Analytic Issues in Heart Failure Biomarkers). These, and other issues discussed below, require additional study before routine use of BNP and NT-proBNP for risk assessment in ACS can be recommended.

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7. Mortality risk stratified by BNP concentrations over the range of 40–160 pg/mL (Triage, Biosite). The odds ratios (ORs) and 2 statistics in the table below the chart are based on BNP results dichotomized at the lower bound of the range. With permission from Morrow et al.84.

Whether there is an optimal timing for measurement also warrants additional investigation. When measured at admission⁸⁶, <24 h after symptom onset⁸⁴, or 2–5 days after the index event, BNP and/or NT-proBNP maintain prognostic performance⁸³. However, the concentrations of natriuretic peptides change over time after presentation and it is possible that the association with clinical risk may vary based on the time of ascertainment. Serial measurements appear to provide additional information that may reflect the patient’s risk at presentation as well as the response to therapy and effects of ventricular remodeling^97–99.

D. Therapeutic Decision-Making
Few studies have evaluated the effects of specific therapies on ameliorating the risk associated with increased BNP or NT-proBNP in ACS (see Section III-A2). Two studies have evaluated whether BNP/NT-proBNP is helpful for identifying candidates for early routine referral for coronary revascularization ("early invasive strategy") after ACS. In the first of these studies, patients with an increased plasma concentration of BNP experienced a similar benefit of the early invasive approach compared to patients with BNP <80 pg/mL⁸⁴. In the second, a trend toward greater benefit with the early invasive strategy was apparent in patients in the highest tertile of NT-proBNP⁸⁸. This latter observation is supported by a nonrandomized evaluation of patients with increased NT-proBNP who did and did not undergo revascularization¹⁰⁰. One study has shown a significant reduction in the risk of death or new heart failure in patients with increased BNP treated with intensive statin therapy¹⁰¹.

Although convincing data for a strong interaction between the biomarker and specific therapeutic strategies do not yet exist for natriuretic peptides as they do for troponin, BNP and NT-proBNP do assist in an assessment of absolute global risk and may therefore still inform clinical decision-making. For example, owing to the very low mortality rate observed for patients with negative troponin results and low concentrations of BNP or NT-proBNP, it has been proposed that less aggressive management strategies may be employed for such patients¹⁰². In addition, studies of both BNP and NT-proBNP have demonstrated that a decline to a lower concentration of natriuretic peptides over time after presentation with ACS is associated with more favorable outcomes and thus raised the possibility that natriuretic peptides may be useful as a tool to monitor the response to preventive interventions^98,99.

3. Biochemical Markers of Inflammation
A. Pathophysiology
Multiple lines of investigation have converged to implicate inflammation as a central contributor to plaque compromise¹⁰³. Inflammatory processes participate in the earliest stages of atherogenesis in response to insults to the vascular endothelium, as well as to the development of the intermediate and mature atheromatous plaque. Ultimately, inflammatory cells and mediators participate in compromising the protective fibrous cap that maintains separation between the highly procoagulant contents of the atheroma core and circulating platelets and coagulation proteins^104,105. Thus, several mediators of the inflammatory response, including acute-phase proteins, cytokines, and cellular adhesion molecules, have been evaluated as potential indicators of the risk of a first acute atherothrombotic event, as well as of recurrent complications after presentation¹⁰⁶. As the prototypical acute-phase reactant, C-reactive protein (CRP) has been the focus of much of the clinical investigation¹⁰⁷.

Increased concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers such as CRP, serum amyloid A, myeloperoxidase, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) are detectable in a substantial proportion of patients presenting with ACS, including those without evidence of myocyte necrosis^107–112. It is plausible that elevation of circulating markers of inflammation during ACS is a manifestation of intensification of the focal inflammatory processes that contribute to destabilization of vulnerable plaque. Nevertheless, the precise basis for the relationship between inflammatory markers and risk in ACS has not been conclusively established. CRP certainly rises as a consequence of the inflammatory response to myocardial necrosis¹¹³. However, studies demonstrating elevation of CRP and IL-6 during ACS in the absence of myocyte necrosis refute the position that the rise in these markers is solely a response to necrosis^107,109,110. CRP has also been implicated as a potential direct participant in atherothrombosis rather than a mere bystander. CRP promotes uptake of LDL cholesterol by monocytes, induces the production of tissue factor, activates complement within arterial plaque, stimulates the expression of adhesion molecules, and may also recruit monocytes via a monocyte-CRP receptor¹⁰³. Nevertheless, in light of limitations to the experimental data, there remains a need for additional investigation of the role of CRP as a potential direct mediator¹¹⁴. Last, the clinical importance of identifying inflammatory activation in ACS may have less to do with the particular inciting culprit and more to do with the widespread presence of vulnerable plaques¹¹⁵ and patient-specific responses to inflammatory stimuli¹¹⁶.

B. Relationship to Clinical Outcomes
There have now been more than 12 clinical studies demonstrating the prognostic capacity of hs-CRP determined either at presentation or at discharge after ACS (Table 3). Data restricted to patients with STEMI are few; in 1 cohort study, patients with increased CRP were more likely to suffer complications of acute MI (myocardial rupture, left ventricular aneurysm, and death by 1 year)¹¹⁷. However, in at least 9 studies, multivariable analysis revealed hs-CRP to be an independent predictor of short- and/or long-term outcome among patients with NSTEACS^{59,60,118–125}. Specifically, measurement of hs-CRP appears to yield additional prognostic value in patients with negative testing of cardiac troponins^109,124 and adds to information obtained from the clinical history and ECG. Several, but not all, studies indicate that the relationship between hs-CRP and outcome is strongest with respect to mortality with a weaker relationship to recurrent MI^60,109,119. Whereas hs-CRP is the best studied of the inflammatory markers in the setting of ACS, others such as IL-6^126,127 and myeloperoxidase^111,128 are also associated with prognosis and may eventually prove to add or supercede hs-CRP (see section II-B6).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 3. Summary of clinical studies of CRP in ACS. A. NSTEACS

C. Decision-Limits
The preferred unit for reporting hs-CRP results is mg/L¹²⁹. Multiple decision-limits for hs-CRP, ranging from 3–15 mg/L, have been evaluated for risk assessment in ACS with few comparative studies. Consensus opinion is that the optimal decision limit for ACS is higher than that used in candidates for primary prevention¹²⁹. In 1 prospective evaluation of multiple cut points using receiver-operating characteristics, 15 mg/L was the optimal decision-limit for prediction of a composite of death and recurrent ischemic events¹²². A cut point of 10 mg/L has also been validated in published studies and thus the optimal decision limit remains to be determined^59,60,124. When tested 1 or more months after presentation with ACS, use of cut points recommended for patients at risk for or with stable coronary artery disease (low: <1 mg/L; intermediate 1–3 mg/L; high: >3 mg/L) is appropriate^129,130. Additional comparative studies of decision-limits for hsCRP in ACS are likely to be useful. In addition, recognition of differences in the distribution of hs-CRP based on race and ethnicity may warrant specific reporting of decision-limits^131–133.

The best timing for measurement of hs-CRP for risk stratification in ACS remains uncertain. Potential confounding by the inflammatory response to necrosis must be considered when samples are drawn late after presentation of patients with MI^134,135. Studies with samples drawn early after presentation^109,121, at discharge^120,123, and during the convalescent phase of recovery (months postMI)^130,136 have all demonstrated independent associations with subsequent outcomes. In 2 comparative studies of samples drawn at admission vs discharge, a modest advantage of the predischarge assessment was evident (but not statistically heterogeneous)^120,123. It is plausible that values of CRP obtained early during the presentation with ACS reflect different pathophysiologic contributors and relationships to risk than those manifest by determination of CRP after resolution of the acute-phase response. Data raising the potential value of late measurement (1 month after ACS) for monitoring therapy (discussed below) may indicate greater clinical utility to values obtained later rather than early after ACS¹³⁰. Additional research aimed at resolving these issues is needed.

D. Therapeutic Decision-Making
The appropriate therapeutic response to increased markers of inflammation in patients with ACS is not yet clear. Treatment with hydroxymethylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) is effective in lowering CRP in patients with recent or prior ACS^137,138. Observations from randomized trials of aggressive vs moderate statin therapy support a possible role for measurement of hs-CRP during follow-up after ACS as a guide for monitoring the success of therapy^130,139. The effect of aspirin on inflammatory markers is controversial but not likely to impact therapeutic selection, as aspirin therapy is administered to all patients with ACS^140–142. It is possible that future work investigating more aggressive antiinflammatory therapies for the acute management of ACS may lead to a role for inflammatory markers in guiding such therapy.

4. Biochemical Markers of Ischemia
Approximately 40%–60% of patients with definite ACS present with an initial troponin concentration below the clinical decision-limit for the assay⁶⁴. Some are presenting early after onset of an acute MI for which cTnI/T is not yet detectable by serum/plasma testing; the remainder are presenting with acute myocardial ischemia without necrosis (i.e., unstable angina). Discriminating these 2 groups from patients with chest pain syndrome of an etiology other than coronary ischemia is a major clinical challenge. Thus, a biomarker that reliably detects myocardial ischemia in the absence of necrosis, and/or before cardiac troponin is increased, has the potential to add substantially to available clinical tools^143,144.

Several biomarkers of myocardial ischemia are under investigation¹⁴⁴. Ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) is among the most thoroughly studied of these markers and has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for clinical use^145–148. The albumin cobalt-binding test for detection of IMA is based on the observation that the affinity of the N-terminus of human albumin for cobalt is reduced in patients with myocardial ischemia. Detectable changes in albumin cobalt binding have been documented to occur minutes after transient occlusion and reperfusion of a coronary artery during angioplasty and return toward baseline within 6 h¹⁴⁶. Reduced albumin cobalt binding also occurs in patients with spontaneous coronary ischemia^145,147,149, with an abnormal concentration detectable before demonstrable increase of cardiac troponin¹⁴⁷. The precise mechanisms for production of IMA during coronary ischemia are not known, but have been localized to modifications of the N-Asp-Ala-His-Lys sequence of human albumin and are proposed to be related to production of free radicals during ischemia and/or reperfusion, reduced oxygen tension, acidosis, and cellular alterations such as disruption of sodium and calcium pump function^146,150.

The clinical specificity of IMA, as well as other potential markers of ischemia such as unbound free fatty acid¹⁵¹ and whole blood choline¹⁵², in the broad population of patients with nontraumatic chest pain and suspected ACS remains an area for further investigation. Increased concentrations of IMA have been demonstrated 24–48 h after endurance exercise and postulated to relate to delayed gastrointestinal ischemia¹⁵³. A deletion defect of the N-terminal causing reduced cobalt binding (a false-positive test for ischemia) has also been reported¹⁴⁹. The concentration of albumin has also been shown to influence albumin cobalt binding in some but not all studies¹⁵⁴. IMA may be considered for use in conjunction with the ECG and cardiac troponin for the diagnostic assessment of suspected ACS to exclude ACS in patients with a low clinical probability¹⁴⁸. Available data highlight the potential for false-positive results when used as a diagnostic tool for ACS. In addition, the concentration of IMA is no longer increased by 6–12 h after provoked ischemia and thus the negative predictive value may be diminished in patients who do not present early after an ischemic event¹⁴⁶. Studies of IMA, and other proposed tests for ischemia, evaluating the prognostic implications and/or interaction with specific therapies as well as the kinetics, analytic performance, and underlying pathophysiology will be important to defining their clinical role.

5. Multimarker Approach
Advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis and consequences of ACS have stimulated development of new biomarkers and created the opportunity for an expanded role of multiple biomarkers in the classification and individualization of treatment^84,155. Accumulating evidence indicates that a multimarker strategy, employing a pathobiologically diverse set of biomarkers, adds to biomarkers of necrosis for risk assessment in ACS¹³. To date, the majority of evidence regarding this strategy entails newer markers paired with troponin, hs-CRP, and BNP are the most extensively studied. Few studies have examined strategies incorporating 2 or more markers in addition to troponin^128,155.

Consistent data from multiple studies indicate that increased concentrations of CRP and BNP or NT-proBNP at presentation identify patients who are at higher mortality risk irrespective of whether there is detectable elevation of troponin^{60,84,89,109,124}. Thus, application of either of these markers along with a biomarker of necrosis (cardiac troponin) enhances risk assessment^{83–86,89,109,124}. Moreover, in one study (with internal validation from 2 separate trials), a simple multimarker approach combining each of these markers (BNP, CRP, cTnI) identified a 6- to 13-fold gradient of mortality risk between those without elevation of any marker and those in whom all 3 markers were increased¹⁵⁵. Additional research evaluating this and other strategies for combining 2 or more pathobiologically diverse biomarkers will clarify the appropriate clinical role for such an approach. In particular, 2 important issues require exploration. First, because the relative risk relationships between the individual biomarkers and specific endpoints differ, the optimal weighting of each marker for assessment of 1 clinical outcome (e.g., mortality risk) may differ from that for evaluating another outcome (e.g., the risk of recurrent MI). Second, given the present lack of a robust database to guide treatment in response to increased concentrations of these "novel" markers, more information is needed to formulate an evidence-based management strategy tied to multimarker testing. Nevertheless, as new markers and therapies are discovered, a multimarker paradigm employing a combination of biomarkers for risk assessment and clinical decision-making has the potential to improve outcomes for patients with ACS¹³.

6. Other Novel Markers
Other biomarkers such as soluble CD40 ligand, (a marker of platelet activation and potential direct participant in plaque destabilization)¹⁵⁶, metalloproteinases (enzymes that disrupt the integrity of the atheroma’s protective cap)¹⁵⁷, and myeloperoxidase (released by leukocytes during activation in the coronary bed)^111,128 are newer markers that have shown potential for risk stratification in ACS. These and other emerging biomarkers that also reflect the underlying pathobiology of atherothrombosis are the substrate of ongoing investigation aimed at determining the optimal combination of biomarkers for characterizing patients with ACS¹⁵⁸. Newer technologies that have facilitated proteomic and genomic strategies for novel marker discovery are likely to extend this approach. Careful evaluation of such novel markers relative to appropriate use of contemporary tools, avoiding limitations to the methodology cited as prevalent in studies of novel biomarkers, is essential to evaluating their potential to add to clinical use¹⁵⁹. In addition, collaborative pooled analyses that evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic performance of new and established biomarkers across multiple studies are likely to be useful in the critical assessment of their individual and combined clinical value.

	III. Use of Biochemical Markers in the Management of NSTEACS

Top Introduction I. Overview of the... II. Use of Biochemical... III. Use of Biochemical... B. Biochemical Marker... IV. Use of Biochemical... V. References

 
A. Clinical Decision-Making

Recommendations for the Use of Biochemical Cardiac Markers for Therapeutic Decision-Making

Class I
Among patients with a clinical history consistent with ACS, an increased concentration of cardiac troponin should prompt application of ACS management guidelines for patients with indicators of high risk (Level of Evidence: B).

Class III

1. Application of management guidelines for ACS should not be based solely on measurement of natriuretic peptides (Level of Evidence: C).
   
2. Application of management guidelines for ACS should not be based solely on measurement of CRP (Level of Evidence: C).
   

1. Biochemical Markers of Cardiac Injury
The recommendation for measurement of cardiac troponin in all patients with suspected ACS derives not only from the importance of biomarkers of necrosis for risk assessment but also from the established value of cardiac troponin, in particular, for therapeutic decision-making. Consistent with the observation that patients with an increased concentration of troponin are more likely to have complex thrombotic coronary lesions, they also derive greater benefit from more aggressive anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and invasive therapies (Figs. 8 and 9). As such, patients with suspected ACS and abnormal troponin results should be treated in accordance with the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology¹ and European Society of Cardiology² guidelines for the management of high-risk patients with NSTEACS. These guidelines for the management of ACS are expected to be dynamic over time as new experience and evidence emerge. The reader should recognize that the data guiding this recommendation originate from patients with a high clinical probability for ACS. Aggressive treatment with potent antithrombotic therapies and early invasive evaluation is often not appropriate for patients with abnormal troponin results due to mechanisms other than ACS (e.g., myocarditis or sepsis). Data regarding the efficacy of specific therapies in patients with increased cardiac troponin are discussed below.

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 8. Effect of potent antithrombotic therapy on the risk of death and recurrent ischemic events. Left, effect of the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, tirofiban, among patients with NSTEAC syndrome enrolled in the Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management (PRISM) trial. Data from Heeschen et al.162. Right, effect of the low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin, among patients with NSTEAC syndrome enrolled in the TIMI 11B trial. Data from Morrow et al.67. Neg, negative; Pos, positive; UR, urgent revascularization prompted by recurrent ischemia.

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 9. Benefit of an early invasive (Inv) vs conservative (Con) management strategy on the risk of death and new/recurrent MI at 6 months in patients with NSTEAC syndrome enrolled in the TACTICS-TIMI 18 trial. The early invasive strategy consisted of routine cardiac catheterization within 48 h of presentation and revascularization when appropriate regardless of clinical course. The conservative strategy included coronary angiography and revascularization only when prompted by recurrent spontaneous or provoked ischemia. Data from Morrow et al.66. Neg, negative; Pos, positive.

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin
Two studies indicate that potent antithrombotic therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin offers particular benefit among patients with an increased concentration of troponin. In the TIMI 11B trial, patients with an increased serum concentration of cTnI at presentation experienced a 50% reduction in death, MI, or recurrent ischemia at 14 days when treated with enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin. In contrast, there was no demonstrable advantage of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in patients without detectable cTnI⁶⁷. In the Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery (FRISC) trial, extended treatment with dalteparin (Fragmin) after the initial hospitalization conferred a benefit only among patients with increased cardiac troponin ¹⁶⁰.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibition
Four studies provide evidence for an interaction between troponin results and the efficacy of potent platelet inhibition with intravenous glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists^161–164. In the first of these studies, among patients treated with abciximab for 24 h before percutaneous intervention, those with an increased concentration of troponin experienced a 70% relative reduction in the risk of death or MI, while those with negative troponin results had no benefit compared with placebo¹⁶¹. Similar results have been obtained with 2 other GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors^162–164. Discordant results from one study are notable¹⁶⁵. In a trial that tested abciximab as medical therapy in patients being managed conservatively (without early coronary angiography) for NSTEACS, there was no benefit of abciximab, including among patients with increased concentration of troponin. These results are not yet well explained, but may derive from the specific medical strategy and dosing in this trial. Accordingly, the 2002 update to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina and Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction recommends the use of GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in patients with increased troponin whether (Class I) or not (Class IIa, eptifibatide or tirofiban only) early cardiac catheterization and revascularization are planned¹.

Early Invasive Strategy
The TACTICS-TIMI 18 trial prospectively examined the value of cardiac troponin for identifying patients who would benefit from an early invasive management strategy. Among patients with an increased concentration of troponin at presentation, a strategy of early angiography (4 to 48 h) and revascularization (if appropriate) achieved a 55% reduction in the odds of death or MI compared with a conservative management strategy [Fig. 9⁶⁶]. Early angiography and revascularization was not associated with a detectable benefit in patients who did not have an increased concentration of troponin. Importantly, the advantage of an early invasive strategy was evident even among patients with the lowest level of troponin elevation (cTnI 0.1–0.5 µg/L and cTnT 0.01–0.05 µg/L)⁶⁶. These data, along with similar results from the FRISC II trial¹⁶⁶, support the recommendation for early angiography in patients with suspected ACS and an increased concentration of troponin¹.

2. Other Biochemical Markers
Consistent and compelling evidence for interactions between other available biomarkers (e.g., BNP and hs-CRP) and specific treatment strategies in ACS are not yet available (see Section II-B for discussion of individual markers/classes). A number of interventions, such as early treatment with statins and use of GPIIb/IIIa antagonists, have been shown to reduce the serum concentration of hs-CRP after presentation with ACS and/or in response to percutaneous coronary intervention^137,138. However, testing for a differential impact of treatment among those with or without higher concentrations of CRP has been negative⁵⁹. A substudy of the FRISC II trial has demonstrated the potential for greater benefit of early invasive management in patients with evidence of systemic inflammation (increased IL-6)¹²⁷; however, more data are needed before this application of inflammatory biomarkers can be advocated. Similarly, a trend toward greater efficacy of early invasive management has been manifest among patients with a higher plasma concentration of NT-proBNP⁸⁸. Additional data in this regard are mixed, and more research is needed before a role for natriuretic peptides in therapeutic decision-making is clearly defined⁸⁴. There is some evidence for promise of novel markers for selection of therapy, such as the use of GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in patients with increased concentrations of soluble CD40 ligand¹⁵⁶.

	B. Biochemical Marker Measurement After the Initial Diagnosis

Top Introduction I. Overview of the... II. Use of Biochemical... III. Use of Biochemical... B. Biochemical Marker... IV. Use of Biochemical... V. References

 
After the initial diagnosis of unstable angina or NSTEMI is established, measurement of biomarkers is useful for updating the initial assessment of risk, qualitative assessment of the size of infarction, and detection of new or recurrent myocardial injury. See section IV-B for guidelines regarding the serial collection of biomarkers of injury after an initial diagnosis of MI.

For patients in whom the index event is established to be unstable angina, cardiac troponin is the preferred marker for the detection of new infarction. Diagnostic criteria are as described for the index event (section II-A). Repeat sampling of cardiac troponin should be guided by the patient’s clinical status and obtained when recurrent symptoms consistent with ischemia of sufficient duration to cause myocardial necrosis have occurred. Routine measurement of biomarkers of necrosis after uncomplicated percutaneous coronary revascularization may aid in assessment of long-term risk¹; however, data with more sensitive markers of necrosis are mixed¹⁶⁷, and the implications for periprocedural management are uncertain.

	IV. Use of Biochemical Markers in the Management of STEMI

Top Introduction I. Overview of the... II. Use of Biochemical... III. Use of Biochemical... B. Biochemical Marker... IV. Use of Biochemical... V. References

 
The diagnosis of STEMI is made by recognition of acute ST-segment elevation (or reciprocal depression) on the 12-lead electrocardiogram. Therefore, appropriate therapy should be instituted on the basis of a diagnostic ECG (See section II-A4)¹⁰. Confirmation of myocardial necrosis is subsequently made using specific biomarkers of necrosis. In addition to this confirmatory application, biomarkers may be used for several other purposes in the management of patients with STEMI.

A. Noninvasive Assessment of Reperfusion
One of the most challenging decisions in the acute care of patients with STEMI is when (and if) to perform urgent cardiac catheterization following fibrinolytic therapy. The pattern of rise and fall of biomarkers of necrosis can assist in a noninvasive assessment of the success of reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery. In the early experience with fibrinolytics, it was noted that reperfusion of an occluded artery was accompanied by an abrupt increase in serum CK followed by an early peak, findings that were attributed to washout of proteins from injured cells at the time of restoration of blood flow^168,169. Investigators thus recognized that the rate of rise in biomarkers of necrosis over the first few hours after reperfusion therapy provided information regarding patency of the infarct-related artery. Myoglobin has attracted the most attention for this purpose because of its small molecular size and consequent rapid release^170–172. Rapid washouts of myoglobin, cTnT or cTnI, or CKMB have positive predictive values (PPV) >90% for infarct artery patency^171–174.

However, a number of factors have limited the clinical application of these findings. First, absence of biomarker washout appears to overestimate the likelihood of an occluded artery and cannot accurately distinguish slow from normal flow^172,174. Second, the logistical challenges of performing multiple measurements in real time have limited use of this strategy. Last, with the steady trend toward more frequent use of primary angioplasty (where there is direct angiographic assessment of the artery) for the treatment of STEMI, the relevance of this application to contemporary practice is diminishing.

B. Biochemical Marker Measurement After the Diagnosis of Acute MI

Recommendations for Measurement of Biochemical Markers of Cardiac Injury After the Diagnosis of MI

Class I
1. Once the diagnosis of acute MI is ascertained, testing of biochemical markers of injury at a reduced frequency (e.g., Q6–10 h x 3) is valuable to qualitatively estimate the size of the infarction and to facilitate the detection of complications such as reinfarction (Level of Evidence: C).

Class IIa
2. CK-MB is the preferred marker for detection of reinfarction early after the index event when the concentration of cardiac troponin is still increased (Level of Evidence: C).

Class IIb
3. Cardiac troponin may be used as an alternative to CK-MB for detection of reinfarction early after the index event. Serial measurement of troponin is usually necessary to facilitate the discrimination of a new increase in concentration (Level of Evidence C).

During the course of management after the diagnosis of acute MI is ascertained, serial measurements of biomarkers of myocardial necrosis are useful in demonstrating the characteristic rise and/or fall that aids in confirming the diagnosis of MI, providing qualitative information with respect to infarct size and surveying for ongoing or recurrent myocardial ischemia causing reinfarction.

Among patients admitted with MI, the magnitude and temporal course of CK-MB elevation and decline have been shown to correlate strongly with infarct size^175–177. Although experimental and clinical data (using magnetic resonance imaging) demonstrate that cardiac troponin may provide comparable, if not superior, data regarding infarct size and reperfusion^178–181, the clinical meaning of peak values remains less familiar to clinicians. Increases in troponin are demonstrable in cases of early reinfarction¹⁸². However, the scope of available evidence is significantly limited compared with that for CK-MB. In addition, cTnT is known to exhibit a bimodal distribution, and the kinetics for multiple available assays for cTnI have not been studied. Serial testing is usually necessary to discriminate a new increasing pattern of troponin if the concentration is not known to have returned to normal. Because CK-MB falls to the reference interval by 48–72 h, it may aid in the rapid discrimination of reinfarction when symptoms recur between 72 h and 2 weeks after the index MI, when troponin may still be increased from the initial cardiac event. Measurement of CK-MB in conjunction with troponin may also be useful in determining the timing of recent MI. The committee encourages further investigation of the kinetics of available troponin assays, as well as concurrent evaluation of troponin and CK-MB for the diagnosis of early reinfarction. Data directly comparing these biomarkers for detection of reinfarction are few and may help guide deliberation as to whether CK-MB should continue to have a role in the routine care of patients with acute MI.

The value of biomarkers of necrosis to discriminate very early reinfarction (e.g., <18 h) during a period when the concentration of these markers is typically still increasing is limited. As discussed in greater detail in separate guidelines (Cardiac Biomarkers and Other Etiologies), the diagnosis of very early reinfarction rests predominantly on clinical grounds (symptoms and electrocardiographic changes). Routine serial acquisition of surveillance sampling for biomarkers of necrosis after they have returned to the normal range from the index event is not recommended.

	Acknowledgments

 
Disclosures

Financial Disclosures: The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines Committee for Utilization of Biomarkers in Acute Coronary Syndromes and Heart Failure reports all reported relationships within the 2 years previous to this publication that may be relevant to this guidelines document. A document of those relationships may be found in the online Data Supplement at http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol53/issue4.

	Footnotes

 
This article has been copublished in the April issue of Clinical Chemistry (Volume 53, Number 4, 2007).

¹ Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA.

² Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA.

³ Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

⁴ Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

⁵ Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

⁶ University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

⁷ University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

⁸ Nonstandard abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; ECG, electrocardiogram; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, NSTEACS, non-ST elevation ACS; NSTEMI, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; MI, myocardial infarction; CK-MB, creatine kinase MB; cTnI, cardiac troponin I; cTnT, cardiac troponin T; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; BNP, B-type natriuretic peptide; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-BNP; LLD, lower limits of detectability; CRP, C-reactive protein; IL-6, interleukin-6; IMA, ischemia modified albumin; and GP, glycoprotein.

All relationships with industry for the guidelines committee are reported online at <http://www.aacc.org/AACC/members/nacb/LMPG/OnlineGuide/PublishedGuidelines/ACSHeart/heartpdf.htm>.

The materials in this publication represent the opinions of the authors and committee members, and do not represent the official position of the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB). The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry is the academy of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

*Address correspondence to this author at: Director, Rapid Response Laboratories, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S. Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201. Fax 410-328-5880; e-mail rchristenson@umm.edu.

	V. References

Top Introduction I. Overview of the... II. Use of Biochemical... III. Use of Biochemical... B. Biochemical Marker... IV. Use of Biochemical... V. References

 
1. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, Califf RM, Cheitlin MD, Hochman JS, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40: 1366–74.[Free Full Text]

2. Bertrand ME, Simoons ML, Fox KA, Wallentin LC, Hamm CW, McFadden E, et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes: acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST segment elevation; recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2000; 21: 1406–32.[Free Full Text]

3. Storrow AB, Gibler WB. Chest pain centers: diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2000; 35: 449–61.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 959–69.[Free Full Text]

5. Braunwald E. Unstable angina. A classification. Circulation. 1989; 80: 410–4.[Free Full Text]

6. Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Chesebro JH. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (2). N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 310–8.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Chesebro JH. The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes (1). N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 242–50.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Lee RT, Libby P. The unstable atheroma. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 1859–67.

9. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: 2004 Update. Dallas: American Heart Association, 2004.

10. Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brooks NH, Califf RM, Hillis LD, Hiratzka LF, et al. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 890–911.[Free Full Text]

11. The TIMI IIIB Investigators. Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the TIMI IIIB Trial. Circulation. 1994; 89: 1545–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Braunwald E. Unstable angina: an etiologic approach to management. Circulation. 1998; 98: 2219–22.[Free Full Text]

13. Morrow DA, Braunwald E. Future of biomarkers in acute coronary syndromes: moving toward a multimarker strategy. Circulation. 2003; 108: 250–2.[Free Full Text]

14. Maseri A, Rebuzzi AG, Cianflone D. Need for a composite risk stratification of patients with unstable coronary syndromes tailored to clinical practice. Circulation. 1997; 96: 4141–2.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Cannon CP. Evidence-based risk stratification to target therapies in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1588–91.[Free Full Text]

16. Katus HA, Remppis A, Neumann FJ, Scheffold T, Diederich KW, Vinar G, et al. Diagnostic efficiency of troponin T measurements in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1991; 83: 902–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Katus HA, Remppis A, Looser S, Hallermeier K, Scheffold T, Kubler W. Enzyme linked immuno assay of cardiac troponin T for the detection of acute myocardial infarction in patients. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1989; 21: 1349–53.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Bodor GS, Porter S, Landt Y, Ladenson JH. Development of monoclonal antibodies for an assay of cardiac troponin-I and preliminary results in suspected cases of myocardial infarction. Clin Chem. 1992; 38: 2203–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Wu AH, Valdes R, Jr, Apple FS, Gornet T, Stone MA, Mayfield-Stokes S, et al. Cardiac troponin-T immunoassay for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chem. 1994; 40: 900–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Adams JE, III, Sicard GA, Allen BT, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Davila-Roman VG, et al. Diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction with measurement of cardiac troponin I. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 670–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Katus HA, Schoeppenthau M, Tanzeem A, Bauer HG, Saggau W, Diederich KW, et al. Non-invasive assessment of perioperative myocardial cell damage by circulating cardiac troponin T. Br Heart J. 1991; 65: 259–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Apple FS, Falahati A, Paulsen PR, Miller EA, Sharkey SW. Improved detection of minor ischemic myocardial injury with measurement of serum cardiac troponin I. Clin Chem. 1997; 43: 2047–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Ravkilde J, Horder M, Gerhardt W, Ljungdahl L, Pettersson T, Tryding N, et al. Diagnostic performance and prognostic value of serum troponin T in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1993; 53: 677–85.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Hamm CW, Ravkilde J, Gerhardt W, Jorgensen P, Peheim E, Ljungdahl L, et al. The prognostic value of serum troponin T in unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 146–50.[Abstract]

25. Hamm CW, Braunwald E. A classification of unstable angina revisited. Circulation. 2000; 102: 118–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Heidenreich PA, Alloggiamento T, Melsop K, McDonald KM, Go AS, Hlatky MA. The prognostic value of troponin in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 478–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Ohman EM, Casey C, Bengtson JR, Pryor D, Tormey W, Horgan JH. Early detection of acute myocardial infarction: additional diagnostic information from serum concentrations of myoglobin in patients without ST elevation. Br Heart J. 1990; 63: 335–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Brogan GX Jr, Friedman S, McCuskey C, Cooling DS, Berrutti L, Thode HC Jr, et al. Evaluation of a new rapid quantitative immunoassay for serum myoglobin versus CK-MB for ruling out acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1994; 24: 665–71.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Kontos MC, Anderson FP, Hanbury CM, Roberts CS, Miller WG, Jesse RL. Use of the combination of myoglobin and CK-MB mass for the rapid diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med. 1997; 15: 14–9.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Newby LK, Storrow AB, Gibler WB, Garvey JL, Tucker JF, Kaplan AL, et al. Bedside multimarker testing for risk stratification in chest pain units: the Chest pain Evaluation by Creatine Kinase-MB, Myoglobin, And Troponin I (CHECKMATE) study. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1832–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Eggers KM, Oldgren J, Nordenskjold A, Lindahl B. Diagnostic value of serial measurement of cardiac markers in patients with chest pain: limited value of adding myoglobin to troponin I for exclusion of myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2004; 148: 574–81.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Puleo PR, Meyer D, Wathen C, Tawa CB, Wheeler S, Hamburg RJ, et al. Use of a rapid assay of subforms of creatine kinase-MB to diagnose or rule out acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 561–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Katus HA, Remppis A, Scheffold T, Diederich KW, Kuebler W. Intracellular compartmentation of cardiac troponin T and its release kinetics in patients with reperfused and nonreperfused myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1991; 67: 1360–7.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Mair J, Artner-Dworzak E, Lechleitner P, Morass B, Smidt J, Wagner I, et al. Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by a newly developed rapid immunoturbidimetric assay for myoglobin. Br Heart J. 1992; 68: 462–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Antman EM, Grudzien C, Sacks DB. Evaluation of a rapid bedside assay for detection of serum cardiac troponin T. JAMA. 1995; 273: 1279–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Zimmerman J, Fromm R, Meyer D, Boudreaux A, Wun CC, Smalling R, et al. Diagnostic marker cooperative study for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1999; 99: 1671–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Newby LK, Christenson RH, Ohman EM, Armstrong PW, Thompson TD, Lee KL, et al. Value of serial troponin T measures for early and late risk stratification in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The GUSTO-IIa Investigators. Circulation. 1998; 98: 1853–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Kontos MC, Anderson FP, Schmidt KA, Ornato JP, Tatum JL, Jesse RL. Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients without ST-segment elevation. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83: 155–8.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Macrae AR, Kavsak PA, Lustig V, Bhargava R, Vandersluis R, Palomaki GE, et al. Assessing the requirement for the 6-hour interval between specimens in the American Heart Association Classification of Myocardial Infarction in Epidemiology and Clinical Research Studies. Clin Chem. 2006; 52: 812–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. McCord J, Nowak RM, McCullough PA, Foreback C, Borzak S, Tokarski G, et al. Ninety-minute exclusion of acute myocardial infarction by use of quantitative point-of-care testing of myoglobin and troponin I. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1483–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Fesmire FM, Fesmire CE. Improved identification of acute coronary syndromes with second generation cardiac troponin I assay: utility of 2-hour delta cTnI > or = +0.02 ng/mL. J Emerg Med. 2002; 22: 147–52.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Fesmire FM, Christenson RH, Fody EP, Feintuch TA. Delta creatine kinase-MB outperforms myoglobin at two hours during the emergency department identification and exclusion of troponin positive non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 44: 12–9.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Jaffe AS, Ravkilde J, Roberts R, Naslund U, Apple FS, Galvani M, et al. It’s time for a change to a troponin standard. Circulation. 2000; 102: 1216–20.[Free Full Text]

44. Wright SA, Sawyer DB, Sacks DB, Chyu S, Goldhaber SZ. Elevation of troponin I levels in patients without evidence of myocardial injury. JAMA. 1997; 278: 2144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Jaffe AS. Elevations in cardiac troponin measurements: false false-positives: the real truth. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2001; 1: 87–92.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

46. Antman EM, Grudzien C, Mitchell RN, Sacks DB. Detection of unsuspected myocardial necrosis by rapid bedside assay for cardiac troponin T. Am Heart J. 1997; 133: 596–8.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

47. Morrow DA. Troponins in patients with acute coronary syndromes: biologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic implications. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2001; 1: 105–10.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

48. Chen Y, Serfass RC, Mackey-Bojack SM, Kelly KL, Titus JL, Apple FS. Cardiac troponin T alterations in myocardium and serum of rats after stressful, prolonged intense exercise. J Appl Physiol. 2000; 88: 1749–55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Wu AH, Ford L. Release of cardiac troponin in acute coronary syndromes: ischemia or necrosis? Clin Chim Acta. 1999; 284: 161–74.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

50. Benamer H, Steg PG, Benessiano J, Vicaut E, Gaultier CJ, Aubry P, et al. Elevated cardiac troponin I predicts a high-risk angiographic anatomy of the culprit lesion in unstable angina. Am Heart J. 1999; 137: 815–20.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

51. Heeschen C, van Den Brand MJ, Hamm CW, Simoons ML. Angiographic findings in patients with refractory unstable angina according to troponin T status. Circulation. 1999; 100: 1509–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

52. Wong GC, Morrow DA, Murphy S, Kraimer N, Pai R, James D, et al. Elevations in troponin T and I are associated with abnormal tissue level perfusion: a TACTICS-TIMI 18 substudy. Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2002; 106: 202–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

53. Lindahl B, Diderholm E, Lagerqvist B, Venge P, Wallentin L. Mechanisms behind the prognostic value of troponin T in unstable coronary artery disease: a FRISC II substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 979–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

54. Matetzky S, Sharir T, Domingo M, Noc M, Chyu KY, Kaul S, et al. Elevated troponin I level on admission is associated with adverse outcome of primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2000; 102: 1611–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

55. Topol EJ. Inflammation and embolization in ischemic heart disease. J Invasive Cardiol. 2000; 12 (Suppl B): 2B–7B.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

56. Sobel BE, Bresnahan GF, Shell WE, Yoder RD. Estimation of infarct size in man and its relation to prognosis. Circulation. 1972; 46: 640–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Antman EM, Tanasijevic MJ, Thompson B, Schactman M, McCabe CH, Cannon CP, et al. Cardiac-specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 1342–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

58. Alexander JH, Sparapani RA, Mahaffey KW, Deckers JW, Newby LK, Ohman EM, et al. Association between minor elevations of creatine kinase-MB level and mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. PURSUIT Steering Committee. Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy. JAMA. 2000; 283: 347–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

59. Heeschen C, Hamm CW, Bruemmer J, Simoons ML. Predictive value of C-reactive protein and troponin T in patients with unstable angina: a comparative analysis. CAPTURE Investigators. Chimeric c7E3 AntiPlatelet Therapy in Unstable angina REfractory to standard treatment trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 1535–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

60. James SK, Armstrong P, Barnathan E, Califf R, Lindahl B, Siegbahn A, et al. Troponin and C-reactive protein have different relations to subsequent mortality and myocardial infarction after acute coronary syndrome: a GUSTO-IV substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 916–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

61. Ohman EM, Armstrong PW, Christenson RH, Granger CB, Katus HA, Hamm CW, et al. Cardiac troponin T levels for risk stratification in acute myocardial ischemia. GUSTO IIA Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 1333–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

62. Ohman EM, Armstrong PW, White HD, Granger CB, Wilcox RG, Weaver WD, et al. Risk stratification with a point-of-care cardiac troponin T test in acute myocardial infarction. GUSTOIII Investigators. Global Use of Strategies To Open Occluded Coronary Arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84: 1281–6.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

63. Lindahl B, Venge P, Wallentin L. Relation between troponin T and the risk of subsequent cardiac events in unstable coronary artery disease. The FRISC study group. Circulation. 1996; 93: 1651–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

64. Morrow DA, Rifai N, Tanasijevic MJ, Wybenga DR, de Lemos JA, Antman EM. Clinical efficacy of three assays for cardiac troponin I for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B substudy. Clin Chem. 2000; 46: 453–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

65. Kaul P, Newby LK, Fu Y, Hasselblad V, Mahaffey KW, Christenson RH, et al. Troponin T and quantitative ST-segment depression offer complementary prognostic information in the risk stratification of acute coronary syndrome patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 371–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

66. Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Rifai N, Frey MJ, Vicari R, Lakkis N, et al. Ability of minor elevations of troponin I and T to identify patients with unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction who benefit from an early invasive strategy: results from a prospective, randomized trial. JAMA. 2001; 286: 2405–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

67. Morrow DA, Antman EM, Tanasijevic M, Rifai N, de Lemos JA, McCabe CH, et al. Cardiac troponin I for stratification of early outcomes and the efficacy of enoxaparin in unstable angina: a TIMI 11B substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 1812–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

68. Olatidoye AG, Wu AH, Feng YJ, Waters D. Prognostic role of troponin T versus troponin I in unstable angina pectoris for cardiac events with meta-analysis comparing published studies. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 81: 1405–10.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

69. Apple FS, Wu AH, Jaffe AS. European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines for redefinition of myocardial infarction: how to use existing assays clinically and for clinical trials. Am Heart J. 2002; 144: 981–6.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

70. Venge P, Lagerqvist B, Diderholm E, Lindahl B, Wallentin L. Clinical performance of three cardiac troponin assays in patients with unstable coronary artery disease (a FRISC II substudy). Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 1035–41.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

71. Morrow DA, Rifai N, Sabatine MS, Ayanian S, Murphy SA, de Lemos JA, et al. Evaluation of the AccuTnI cardiac troponin I assay for risk assessment in acute coronary syndromes. Clin Chem. 2003; 49: 1396–8.[Free Full Text]

72. Kontos MC, Shah R, Fritz LM, Anderson FP, Tatum JL, Ornato JP, et al. Implication of different cardiac troponin I levels for clinical outcomes and prognosis of acute chest pain patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 958–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

73. de Lemos JA, McGuire DK, Drazner MH. B-type natriuretic peptide in cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 2003; 362: 316–22.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

74. de Lemos JA, Morrow DA. Brain natriuretic peptide measurement in acute coronary syndromes: ready for clinical application? Circulation. 2002; 106: 2868–70.[Free Full Text]

75. Hama N, Itoh H, Shirakami G, Nakagawa O, Suga S, Ogawa Y, et al. Rapid ventricular induction of brain natriuretic peptide gene expression in experimental acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1558–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

76. Toth M, Vuorinen KH, Vuolteenaho O, Hassinen IE, Uusimaa PA, Leppaluoto J, et al. Hypoxia stimulates release of ANP and BNP from perfused rat ventricular myocardium. Am J Physiol. 1994; 266: H1572–80.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

77. Marumoto K, Hamada M, Hiwada K. Increased secretion of atrial and brain natriuretic peptides during acute myocardial ischaemia induced by dynamic exercise in patients with angina pectoris. Clin Sci (Colch). 1995; 88: 551–6.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

78. Tateishi J, Masutani M, Ohyanagi M, Iwasaki T. Transient increase in plasma brain (B-type) natriuretic peptide after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Clin Cardiol. 2000; 23: 776–80.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

79. Arakawa N, Nakamura M, Aoki H, Hiramori K. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentrations predict survival after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27: 1656–61.[Abstract]

80. Omland T, Aakvaag A, Bonarjee VV, Caidahl K, Lie RT, Nilsen DW, et al. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as an indicator of left ventricular systolic function and long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction. Comparison with plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and N- terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide. Circulation. 1996; 93: 1963–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

81. Richards AM, Nicholls MG, Yandle TG, Frampton C, Espiner EA, Turner JG, et al. Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and adrenomedullin: new neurohormonal predictors of left ventricular function and prognosis after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1921–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

82. Talwar S, Squire IB, Downie PF, McCullough AM, Campton MC, Davies JE, et al. Profile of plasma N-terminal proBNP following acute myocardial infarction; correlation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Eur Heart J. 2000; 21: 1514–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

83. de Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Bentley JH, Omland T, Sabatine MS, McCabe CH, et al. The prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1014–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

84. Morrow DA, de Lemos JA, Sabatine MS, Murphy SA, Demopoulos L, DiBattiste P, et al. Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide for risk assessment in unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: BNP and prognosis in TACTICS-TIMI 18. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 1264–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

85. Omland T, de Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Antman EM, Cannon CP, Hall C, et al. Prognostic value of N-terminal pro-atrial and pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 463–5.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

86. Jernberg T, Stridsberg M, Venge P, Lindahl B. N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide on admission for early risk stratification of patients with chest pain and no ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40: 437–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

87. Omland T, Persson A, Ng L, O’Brien R, Karlsson T, Herlitz J, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and long-term mortality in acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2913–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

88. Jernberg T, Lindahl B, Siegbahn A, Andren B, Frostfeldt G, Lagerqvist B, et al. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in relation to inflammation, myocardial necrosis, and the effect of an invasive strategy in unstable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 1909–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

89. James SK, Wallentin L, Armstrong PW, Barnathan ES, Califf RM, Lindahl B, et al. N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide and other risk markers for the separate prediction of mortality and subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with unstable coronary disease: a GUSTO IV substudy. Circulation. 2003; 108: 275–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

90. Morita E, Yasue H, Yoshimura M, Ogawa H, Jougasaki M, Matsumura T, et al. Increased plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1993; 88: 82–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

91. Arakawa N, Nakamura M, Aoki H, Hiramori K. Relationship between plasma level of brain natriuretic peptide and myocardial infarct size. Cardiology. 1994; 85: 334–40.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

92. Nagaya N, Nishikimi T, Goto Y, Miyao Y, Kobayashi Y, Morii I, et al. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide is a biochemical marker for the prediction of progressive ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1998; 135: 21–8.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

93. Richards AM, Nicholls MG, Yandle TG, Ikram H, Espiner EA, Turner JG, et al. Neuroendocrine prediction of left ventricular function and heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. The Christchurch Cardioendocrine Research Group. Heart. 1999; 81: 114–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

94. Richards AM, Nicholls MG, Espiner EA, Lainchbury JG, Troughton RW, Elliott J, et al. B-type natriuretic peptides and ejection fraction for prognosis after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2786–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

95. Omland T, de Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Antman EM, Cannon CP, Hall C, et al. Prognostic value of N-terminal pro-atrial and pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a TIMI 11B substudy. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 463–5.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

96. James S, Armstrong P, Califf R, Simoons ML, Venge P, Wallentin L, et al. Troponin T levels and risk of 30-day outcomes in patients with the acute coronary syndrome: prospective verification in the GUSTO-IV trial. Am J Med. 2003; 115: 178–84.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

97. Heeschen C, Hamm CW, Mitrovic V, Lantelme NH, White HD. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels for dynamic risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2004; 110: 3206–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

98. Lindahl B, Lindback J, Jernberg T, Johnston N, Stridsberg M, Venge P, et al. Serial analyses of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a Fragmin and fast Revascularisation during In Stability in Coronary artery disease (FRISC)-II substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 533–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

99. Morrow DA, de Lemos JA, Blazing MA, Sabatine MS, Murphy SA, Jarolim P, et al. Prognostic value of serial B-type natriuretic peptide testing during follow-up of patients with unstable coronary artery disease. JAMA. 2005; 294: 2866–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

100. James SK, Lindback J, Tilly J, Siegbahn A, Venge P, Armstrong P, et al. Troponin-T and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide predict mortality benefit from coronary revascularization in acute coronary syndromes: a GUSTO-IV substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48: 1146–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

101. Scirica BM, Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Ray KK, Sabatine MS, Jarolim P, et al. Intensive statin therapy and the risk of hospitalization for heart failure after an acute coronary syndrome in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 2326–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

102. Rabbani LE. Acute coronary syndromes—beyond myocyte necrosis. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1057–9.[Free Full Text]

103. Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1135–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

104. Libby P. Molecular bases of the acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 1995; 91: 2844–50.[Free Full Text]

105. Morrow DA, Ridker PM. Inflammation in cardiovascular disease. In: Topol E, ed. Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine Updates. Cedar Knolls: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999: 1–12.

106. Blake GJ, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein and other inflammatory risk markers in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 37S–42S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

107. Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM, Gallimore JR, Grillo RL, Rebuzzi AG, Pepys MB, et al. The prognostic value of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid a protein in severe unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 417–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

108. Berk BC, Weintraub WS, Alexander RW. Elevation of C-reactive protein in "active" coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1990; 65: 168–72.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

109. Morrow DA, Rifai N, Antman EM, Weiner DL, McCabe CH, Cannon CP, et al. C-reactive protein is a potent predictor of mortality independently of and in combination with troponin T in acute coronary syndromes: a TIMI 11A substudy. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31: 1460–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

110. Biasucci LM, Vitelli A, Liuzzo G, Altamura S, Caligiuri G, Monaco C, et al. Elevated levels of interleukin-6 in unstable angina. Circulation. 1996; 94: 874–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

111. Brennan ML, Penn MS, Van Lente F, Nambi V, Shishehbor MH, Aviles RJ, et al. Prognostic value of myeloperoxidase in patients with chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 1595–604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

112. Morrow DA, Rifai N, Antman EM, Weiner DL, McCabe CH, Cannon CP, et al. Serum amyloid A predicts early mortality in acute coronary syndromes: a TIMI 11A substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 358–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

113. Pietila K, Hermens WT, Harmoinen A, Baardman T, Pasternack A, Topol EJ, et al. Comparison of peak serum C-reactive protein and hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with alteplase and streptokinase. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80: 1075–7.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

114. Scirica BM, Morrow DA. Is C-reactive protein an innocent bystander or proatherogenic culprit? The verdict is still out. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2128–34;discussion 2151.

115. Buffon A, Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, D’Onofrio G, Crea F, Maseri A. Widespread coronary inflammation in unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 5–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

116. Liuzzo G, Buffon A, Biasucci LM, Gallimore JR, Caligiuri G, Vitelli A, et al. Enhanced inflammatory response to coronary angioplasty in patients with severe unstable angina. Circulation. 1998; 98: 2370–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

117. Anzai T, Yoshikawa T, Shiraki H, Asakura Y, Akaishi M, Mitamura H, et al. C-reactive protein as a predictor of infarct expansion and cardiac rupture after a first Q-wave acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997; 96: 778–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

118. Haverkate F, Thompson SG, Pyke SD, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB. Production of C-reactive protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. Lancet. 1997; 349: 462–6.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

119. Toss H, Lindahl B, Siegbahn A, Wallentin L. Prognostic influence of increased fibrinogen and C-reactive protein levels in unstable coronary artery disease. FRISC Study Group. Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. 1997; 96: 4204–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

120. Rebuzzi AG, Quaranta G, Liuzzo G, Caligiuri G, Lanza GA, Gallimore JR, et al. Incremental prognostic value of serum levels of troponin T and C- reactive protein on admission in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 715–9.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

121. Tommasi S, Carluccio E, Bentivoglio M, Buccolieri M, Mariotti M, Politano M, et al. C-reactive protein as a marker for cardiac ischemic events in the year after a first, uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83: 1595–9.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

122. Ferreiros ER, Boissonnet CP, Pizarro R, Merletti PFG, Corrado G, Cagide A, et al. Independent prognostic value of elevated C-reactive protein in unstable angina. Circulation. 1999; 100: 1958–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

123. Biasucci L, Liuzzo G, Grillo R, Caligiuri G, Rebuzzi A, Buffon A, et al. Elevated levels of C-reactive protein at discharge in patients with unstable angina predict recurrent instability. Circulation. 1999; 99: 855–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

124. Lindahl B, Toss H, Siegbahn A, Venge P, Wallentin L. Markers of myocardial damage and inflammation in relation to long-term mortality in unstable coronary artery disease. FRISC Study Group. Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1139–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

125. Mueller C, Buettner HJ, Hodgson JM, Marsch S, Perruchoud AP, Roskamm H, et al. Inflammation and long-term mortality after non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with a very early invasive strategy in 1042 consecutive patients. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1412–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

126. Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, Fantuzzi G, Caligiuri G, Rebuzzi AG, Ginnetti F, et al. Increasing levels of interleukin (IL)-1Ra and IL-6 during the first 2 days of hospitalization in unstable angina are associated with increased risk of in-hospital coronary events. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2079–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

127. Lindmark E, Diderholm E, Wallentin L, Siegbahn A. Relationship between interleukin 6 and mortality in patients with unstable coronary artery disease: effects of an early invasive or noninvasive strategy. JAMA. 2001; 286: 2107–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

128. Baldus S, Heeschen C, Meinertz T, Zeiher AM, Eiserich JP, Munzel T, et al. Myeloperoxidase serum levels predict risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1440–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

129. Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, Anderson JL, Cannon RO 3rd, Criqui M, et al. Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2003; 107: 499–511.[Free Full Text]

130. Ridker PM, Cannon CP, Morrow D, Rifai N, Rose LM, McCabe CH, et al. C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 20–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

131. Khera A, McGuire DK, Murphy SA, Stanek HG, Das SR, Vongpatanasin W, et al. Race and gender differences in C-reactive protein levels. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 464–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

132. Albert MA, Glynn RJ, Buring J, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein levels among women of various ethnic groups living in the United States (from the Women’s Health Study). Am J Cardiol. 2004; 93: 1238–42.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

133. Ford ES, Giles WH, Mokdad AH, Myers GL. Distribution and correlates of C-reactive protein concentrations among adult US women. Clin Chem. 2004; 50: 574–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

134. Benamer H, Steg PG, Benessiano J, Vicaut E, Gaultier CJ, Boccara A, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of C-reactive protein and troponin I in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82: 845–50.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

135. de Winter RJ, Fischer J, Bholasingh R, van Straalen JP, de Jong T, Tijssen JG, et al. C-reactive protein and cardiac troponin T in risk stratification: differences in optimal timing of tests early after the onset of chest pain. Clin Chem. 2000; 46: 1597–603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

136. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer MA, Sacks FM, Moye LA, Goldman S, et al. Inflammation, pravastatin, and the risk of coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Investigators. Circulation. 1998; 98: 839–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

137. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer MA, Sacks FM, Braunwald E. Long-term effects of pravastatin on plasma concentration of C-reactive protein. Circulation. 1999; 100: 230–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

138. Kinlay S, Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Rifai N, Leslie SJ, Sasiela WJ, et al. High-dose atorvastatin enhances the decline in inflammatory markers in patients with acute coronary syndromes in the MIRACL study. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1560–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

139. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Crowe T, Sasiela WJ, Tsai J, et al. Statin therapy, LDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 29–38.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

140. Ikonomidis I, Andreotti F, Economou E, Stefanadis C, Toutouzas P, Nihoyannopoulos P. Increased proinflammatory cytokines in patients with chronic stable angina and their reduction by aspirin. Circulation. 1999; 100: 793–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

141. Feldman M, Jialal I, Devaraj S, Cryer B. Effects of low-dose aspirin on serum C-reactive protein and thromboxane B2 concentrations: a placebo-controlled study using a highly sensitive C-reactive protein assay. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 2036–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

142. Kennon S, Price CP, Mills PG, Ranjadayalan K, Cooper J, Clarke H, et al. The effect of aspirin on C-reactive protein as a marker of risk in unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 1266–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

143. Jesse RL, Kukreja R. Rationale for the early clinical application of markers of ischemia in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2001; 1: 125–33.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

144. Morrow DA, de Lemos JA, Sabatine MS, Antman EM. The search for a biomarker of cardiac ischemia. Clin Chem. 2003; 49: 537–9.[Free Full Text]

145. Bar-Or D, Lau E, Winkler JV. A novel assay for cobalt-albumin binding and its potential as a marker for myocardial ischemia: a preliminary report. J Emerg Med. 2000; 19: 311–5.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

146. Bar-Or D, Winkler JV, Vanbenthuysen K, Harris L, Lau E, Hetzel FW. Reduced albumin-cobalt binding with transient myocardial ischemia after elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a preliminary comparison to creatine kinase-MB, myoglobin, and troponin I. Am Heart J. 2001; 141: 985–91.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

147. Christenson RH, Duh SH, Sanhai WR, Wu AH, Holtman V, Painter P, et al. Characteristics of an Albumin Cobalt Binding Test for assessment of acute coronary syndrome patients: a multicenter study. Clin Chem. 2001; 47: 464–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

148. Peacock F, Morris DL, Anwaruddin S, Christenson RH, Collinson PO, Goodacre SW, et al. Meta-analysis of ischemia-modified albumin to rule out acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department. Am Heart J. 2006; 152: 253–62.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

149. Bhagavan NV, Lai EM, Rios PA, Yang J, Ortega-Lopez AM, Shinoda H, et al. Evaluation of human serum albumin cobalt binding assay for the assessment of myocardial ischemia and myocardial infarction. Clin Chem. 2003; 49: 581–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

150. Bar-Or D, Curtis G, Rao N, Bampos N, Lau E. Characterization of the Co(2+) and Ni(2+) binding amino-acid residues of the N-terminus of human albumin. An insight into the mechanism of a new assay for myocardial ischemia. Eur J Biochem. 2001; 268: 42–7.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

151. Kleinfeld AM, Prothro D, Brown DL, Davis RC, Richieri GV, DeMaria A. Increases in serum unbound free fatty acid levels following coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78: 1350–4.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

152. Danne O, Mockel M, Lueders C, Mugge C, Zschunke GA, Lufft H, et al. Prognostic implications of elevated whole blood choline levels in acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91: 1060–7.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

153. Apple FS, Quist HE, Otto AP, Mathews WE, Murakami MM. Release characteristics of cardiac biomarkers and ischemia-modified albumin as measured by the albumin cobalt-binding test after a marathon race. Clin Chem. 2002; 48: 1097–100.[Free Full Text]

154. Refaai MA, Wright RW, Parvin CA, Gronowski AM, Scott MG, Eby CS. Ischemia-modified albumin increases after skeletal muscle ischemia during arthroscopic knee surgery. Clin Chim Acta. 2006; 366: 264–8.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

155. Sabatine MS, Morrow DA, de Lemos JA, Gibson CM, Murphy SA, Rifai N, et al. Multimarker approach to risk stratification in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: simultaneous assessment of troponin I, C-reactive protein, and B-type natriuretic peptide. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1760–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

156. Heeschen C, Dimmeler S, Hamm CW, van den Brand MJ, Boersma E, Zeiher AM, et al. Soluble CD40 ligand in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 1104–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

157. Bayes-Genis A, Conover CA, Overgaard MT, Bailey KR, Christiansen M, Holmes DR, Jr., et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A as a marker of acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1022–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

158. Apple FS, Wu AH, Mair J, Ravkilde J, Panteghini M, Tate J, et al. Future biomarkers for detection of ischemia and risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome. Clin Chem. 2005; 51: 810–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

159. Jaffe AS, Katus H. Acute coronary syndrome biomarkers: the need for more adequate reporting. Circulation. 2004; 110: 104–6.[Free Full Text]

160. Lindahl B, Venge P, Wallentin L. Troponin T identifies patients with unstable coronary artery disease who benefit from long-term antithrombotic protection. Fragmin in Unstable Coronary Artery Disease (FRISC) Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 43–8.[Abstract]

161. Hamm CW, Heeschen C, Goldmann B, Vahanian A, Adgey J, Miguel CM, et al. Benefit of abciximab in patients with refractory unstable angina in relation to serum troponin T levels. c7E3 Fab Antiplatelet Therapy in Unstable Refractory Angina (CAPTURE) Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 1623–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

162. Heeschen C, Hamm CW, Goldmann B, Deu A, Langenbrink L, White HD. Troponin concentrations for stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes in relation to therapeutic efficacy of tirofiban. Lancet. 1999; 354: 1757–62.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

163. Newby LK, Ohman EM, Christenson RH, Moliterno DJ, Harrington RA, White HD, et al. Benefit of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndromes and troponin T-positive status: the paragon-B troponin T substudy. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2891–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

164. Januzzi JL, Chae CU, Sabatine MS, Jang IK. Elevation in serum troponin I predicts the benefit of tirofiban. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2001; 11: 211–5.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

165. Simoons ML. Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker abciximab on outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without early coronary revascularisation: the GUSTO IV-ACS randomised trial. Lancet. 2001; 357: 1915–24.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

166. FRISC II Investigators. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. Lancet. 1999; 354: 708–15.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

167. Wu AH, Boden WE, McKay RG. Long-term follow-up of patients with increased cardiac troponin concentrations following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 1300–2.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

168. Ganz W, Buchbinder N, Marcus H, Mondkar A, Maddahi J, Charuzi Y, et al. Intracoronary thrombolysis in evolving myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1981; 101: 4–13.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

169. Rentrop P, Blanke H, Karsch KR, Kaiser H, Kostering H, Leitz K. Selective intracoronary thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris. Circulation. 1981; 63: 307–17.[Free Full Text]

170. Christenson R, Ohman E, Topol E, Peck S, Newby L, Duh S, et al. Assessment of coronary reperfusion after thrombolysis with a model combining myoglobin, creatine kinase-MB, and clinical variables. Circulation. 1997; 96: 1776–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

171. Stewart J, French J, Theroux P, Ramanthan K, Solymoss B, Johnson R, et al. Early noninvasive identification of failed reperfusion after intravenous thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31: 1499–1505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

172. Tanasijevic MJ, Cannon CP, Antman EM, Wybenga DR, Fischer GA, Grudzien C, et al. Myoglobin, creatine-kinase-MB and cardiac troponin-I 60-minute ratios predict infarct-related artery patency after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: results from the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction study (TIMI) 10B. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 739–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

173. Klootwijk P, Langer A, Meij S, Green C, Veldkamp RF, Ross AM, et al. Non-invasive prediction of reperfusion and coronary artery patency by continuous ST segment monitoring in the GUSTO-I trial. Eur Heart J. 1996; 17: 689–98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

174. de Lemos JA, Morrow DA, Gibson CM, Murphy SA, Rifai N, Tanasijevic M, et al. Early noninvasive detection of failed epicardial reperfusion after fibrinolytic therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 88: 353–8.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

175. Roberts R, Henry PD, Sobel BE. An improved basis for enzymatic estimation of infarct size. Circulation. 1975; 52: 743–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

176. Grande P, Hansen BF, Christiansen C, Naestoft J. Estimation of acute myocardial infarct size in man by serum CK-MB measurements. Circulation. 1982; 65: 756–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

177. Christenson RH, Vollmer RT, Ohman EM, Peck S, Thompson TD, Duh SH, et al. Relation of temporal creatine kinase-MB release and outcome after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. TAMI Study Group. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85: 543–7.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

178. Ingkanisorn WP, Rhoads KL, Aletras AH, Kellman P, Arai AE. Gadolinium delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance correlates with clinical measures of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 2253–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

179. Ricchiuti V, Sharkey SW, Murakami MM, Voss EM, Apple FS. Cardiac troponin I and T alterations in dog hearts with myocardial infarction: correlation with infarct size. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998; 110: 241–7.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

180. Tanaka H, Abe S, Yamashita T, Arima S, Saigo M, Nakao S, et al. Serum levels of cardiac troponin I and troponin T in estimating myocardial infarct size soon after reperfusion. Coron Artery Dis. 1997; 8: 433–9.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

181. Licka M, Zimmermann R, Zehelein J, Dengler TJ, Katus HA, Kubler W. Troponin T concentrations 72 hours after myocardial infarction as a serological estimate of infarct size. Heart. 2002; 87: 520–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

182. Apple FS, Murakami MM. Cardiac troponin and creatine kinase MB monitoring during in-hospital myocardial reinfarction. Clin Chem. 2005; 51: 460–3.[Free Full Text]

183. Darbar D, Davidson NC, Gillespie N, Choy AM, Lang CC, Shyr Y, et al. Diagnostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78: 284–7.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

184. Crilley JG, Farrer M. Left ventricular remodelling and brain natriuretic peptide after first myocardial infarction. Heart. 2001; 86: 638–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

185. Oltrona L, Ardissino D, Merlini PA, Spinola A, Chiodo F, Pezzano A. C-reactive protein elevation and early outcome in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80: 1002–6.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

186. Oltrona L, Merlini PA, Savonitto S, Broccolino M, Giarratana G, Pezzano A, et al. Lack of correlation between activation of hemostatic mechanism and inflammation in unstable angina pectoris. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1998; 5: 169–73.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

187. Bazzino O, Ferreiros ER, Pizarro R, Corrado G. C-reactive protein and the stress tests for the risk stratification of patients recovering from unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2001; 87: 1235–9.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

188. Oltrona L, Ottani F, Galvani M. Clinical significance of a single measurement of troponin-I and C-reactive protein at admission in 1773 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2004; 148: 405–15.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

189. de Winter RJ, Bholasingh R, Lijmer JG, Koster RW, Gorgels JP, Schouten Y, et al. Independent prognostic value of C-reactive protein and troponin I in patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 1999; 42: 240–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

190. Mulvihill NT, Foley JB, Murphy RT, Curtin R, Crean PA, Walsh M. Risk stratification in unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction using soluble cell adhesion molecules. Heart. 2001; 85: 623–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

191. Bholasingh R, Cornel JH, Kamp O, van Straalen JP, Sanders GT, Dijksman L, et al. The prognostic value of markers of inflammation in patients with troponin T-negative chest pain before discharge from the emergency department. Am J Med. 2003; 115: 521–8.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

192. Bodi V, Sanchis J, Llacer A, Facila L, Nunez J, Bertomeu V, et al. Risk stratification in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: predictive power of troponin I, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen and homocysteine. Int J Cardiol. 2005; 98: 277–83.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

193. Versaci F, Gaspardone A, Tomai F, Crea F, Chiariello L, Gioffre PA. Predictive value of C-reactive protein in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing coronary artery stent implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85: 92–5, A8.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

194. Zebrack JS, Anderson JL, Maycock CA, Horne BD, Bair TL, Muhlestein JB. Usefulness of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in predicting long-term risk of death or acute myocardial infarction in patients with unstable or stable angina pectoris or acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 89: 145–9.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

195. Sanchez PL, Morinigo JL, Pabon P, Martin F, Piedra I, Palacios IF, et al. Prognostic relations between inflammatory markers and mortality in diabetic patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart. 2004; 90: 264–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

196. Pietila KO, Harmoinen AP, Jokiniitty J, Pasternack AI. Serum C-reactive protein concentration in acute myocardial infarction and its relationship to mortality during 24 months of follow-up in patients under thrombolytic treatment. Eur Heart J. 1996; 17: 1345–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

197. Nikfardjam M, Mullner M, Schreiber W, Oschatz E, Exner M, Domanovits H, et al. The association between C-reactive protein on admission and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Intern Med. 2000; 247: 341–5.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

198. Mega JL, Morrow DA, De Lemos JA, Sabatine MS, Murphy SA, Rifai N, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide at presentation and prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an ENTIRE-TIMI-23 substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 335–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. L. P Ribeiro Natriuretic peptides in elderly people with acute myocardial infarction BMJ, May 6, 2009; 338(may06_1): b787 - b787. [Full Text]

				S. A. Halim, J. Mulgund, A. Y. Chen, M. T. Roe, E. D. Peterson, W. B. Gibler, E. M. Ohman, and L. K. Newby Use of Guidelines-Recommended Management and Outcomes Among Women and Men With Low-Level Troponin Elevation: Insights From CRUSADE Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 199 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Shahangian and S. R. Snyder Laboratory Medicine Quality Indicators: A Review of the Literature Am J Clin Pathol, March 1, 2009; 131(3): 418 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. M. Scirica, C. P. Cannon, M. S. Sabatine, P. Jarolim, S. Sloane, N. Rifai, E. Braunwald, D. A. Morrow, and for the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Investigators Concentrations of C-Reactive Protein and B-Type Natriuretic Peptide 30 Days after Acute Coronary Syndromes Independently Predict Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Cardiovascular Death Clin. Chem., February 1, 2009; 55(2): 265 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A S Hall and J H Barth Universal definition of myocardial infarction Heart, February 1, 2009; 95(3): 247 - 249. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Mega, D. A. Morrow, J. A. de Lemos, S. Mohanavelu, C. P. Cannon, and M. S. Sabatine Thrombus precursor protein and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 24, 2008; 51(25): 2422 - 2429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Morrow, M. S. Sabatine, M.-L. Brennan, J. A. de Lemos, S. A. Murphy, C. T. Ruff, N. Rifai, C. P. Cannon, and S. L. Hazen Concurrent evaluation of novel cardiac biomarkers in acute coronary syndrome: myeloperoxidase and soluble CD40 ligand and the risk of recurrent ischaemic events in TACTICS-TIMI 18 Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2008; 29(9): 1096 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M G Nicholls, C M Frampton, and T G Yandle BNP: not just for heart failure Heart, January 1, 2008; 94(1): 6 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Thygesen, J. S. Alpert, H. D. White, and on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 27, 2007; 50(22): 2173 - 2195. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Thygesen, J. S. Alpert, H. D. White, on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force, TASK FORCE MEMBERS: Chairpersons: Kristian Thygese, Biomarker Group: Allan S. Jaffe, Coordinator (USA), ECG Group: Bernard Chaitman, Co-ordinator (USA), P, Imaging Group: Richard Underwood, Coordinator (UK), Intervention Group: Jean-Pierre Bassand, Co-ordina, Clinical Investigation Group: Paul W. Armstrong, C, et al. Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction Circulation, November 27, 2007; 116(22): 2634 - 2653. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. de Lemos and M. O'Donoghue The Skinny on Fatty Acid-Binding Protein J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2007; 50(21): 2068 - 2070. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Task Force Members, K. Thygesen, J. S. Alpert, H. D. White, Biomarker Group, A. S. Jaffe, F. S. Apple, M. Galvani, H. A. Katus, L. K. Newby, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction: Kristian Thygesen, Joseph S. Alpert and Harvey D. White on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2007; 28(20): 2525 - 2538. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Morrow Appraisal of Myeloperoxidase for Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 22, 2007; 49(20): 2001 - 2002. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Free upon publication Extract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 115/13/e356    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.107.182882v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Christenson, R. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Christenson, R. H. Related Collections Other heart failure AHA Statements and Guidelines Acute coronary syndromes