Published online before print February 19, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.687152
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2007;115:1211-1217.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Coronary Heart Disease |
Renal Insufficiency Following Contrast Media Administration Trial (REMEDIAL)
A Randomized Comparison of 3 Preventive Strategies
From the Laboratory of Interventional Cardiology and Department of Cardiology, Clinica Mediterranea, Naples (C.B., D.D., A.F., B.R.); Laboratory of Interventional Cardiology, "Vita e Salute" University School of Medicine, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan (C.B., F.A., N.M., I.M., M.M., M.C., J.C., A.C.); and Institute of Medical Statistics and Biometry, University of Milan, Milan (E.B.), Italy.
Correspondence to Carlo Briguori, MD, PhD, Interventional Cardiology, Clinica Mediterranea, Via Orazio, 2, I-80121, Naples, Italy. E-mail briguori.carlo{at}hsr.it
Received December 28, 2006; accepted January 5, 2007.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background— Volume supplementation by saline infusion combined with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) represents an effective strategy to prevent contrast agent–induced nephrotoxicity (CIN). Preliminary data support the concept that sodium bicarbonate and ascorbic acid also may be effective in preventing CIN.
Methods and Results— Three hundred twenty-six consecutive patients with chronic kidney disease, referred to our institutions for coronary and/or peripheral procedures, were randomly assigned to prophylactic administration of 0.9% saline infusion plus NAC (n=111), sodium bicarbonate infusion plus NAC (n=108), and 0.9% saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC (n=107). All enrolled patients had serum creatinine 
2.0 mg/dL and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 mL · min–1 · 1.73 m–2. Contrast nephropathy risk score was calculated in each patient. In all cases, iodixanol (an iso-osmolar, nonionic contrast agent) was administered. The primary end point was an increase of 25% in the creatinine concentration 48 hours after the procedure (CIN). The amount of contrast media administered (179±102, 169±92, and 169±94 mL, respectively; P=0.69) and risk scores (9.1±3.4, 9.5±3.6, and 9.3±3.6; P=0.21) were similar in the 3 groups. CIN occurred in 11 of 111 patients (9.9%) in the saline plus NAC group, in 2 of 108 (1.9%) in the bicarbonate plus NAC group (P=0.019 by Fisher exact test versus saline plus NAC group), and in 11 of 107 (10.3%) in the saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group (P=1.00 versus saline plus NAC group).
Conclusions— The strategy of volume supplementation by sodium bicarbonate plus NAC seems to be superior to the combination of normal saline with NAC alone or with the addition of ascorbic acid in preventing CIN in patients at medium to high risk.
Key Words: angiography • angioplasty • complications • contrast media • kidney • prevention
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Radiocontrast media can lead to a reversible form of acute renal failure that becomes apparent soon after the administration of the dye and is generally benign.1 Transient dialysis may be required, however, especially in high-risk patients.2,3 The optimal strategy to prevent contrast agent–induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) remains uncertain. The most recent guidelines4 recommend intravenous volume expansion with a saline solution, use of a low- or iso-osmolality contrast agent, and limits on the volume of contrast agent.
Clinical Perspective p 1217
The generation of reactive oxygen species has been considered an important pathophysiological cause of CIN.5 N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a potent antioxidant that scavenges a wide variety of oxygen-derived free radicals. NAC may prevent CIN by stopping direct oxidative tissue damage and by improving renal hemodynamics.6–8 Recently, 2 additional antioxidant strategies have aroused considerable interest: volume supplementation by sodium bicarbonate9 and the administration of ascorbic acid.10 Both approaches should be effective because of their antioxidant properties. We hypothesized that a combination of different antioxidant compounds may give additive benefit in preventing CIN. To test this hypothesis, we performed a prospective, double-blind, randomized study comparing different combinations of antioxidant compounds in patients at medium to high risk for CIN undergoing iso-osmolar contrast agent administration during coronary or peripheral procedures.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Patient Population
The present 2-center, randomized, double-blind study compared 3 different strategies for preventing CIN in patients with chronic kidney disease who underwent coronary and/or peripheral angiography and/or angioplasty from January 2005 to August 2006. During this time period, consecutive eligible patients scheduled for coronary and/or peripheral angiography and/or angioplasty were considered for enrollment. Individuals
18 years of age with stable serum creatinine concentration 2.0 mg/dL and/or or an estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 mL · min–1 · 1.73 m–2 were considered eligible for the present study. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated by applying the level-modified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula: (186.3xserum creatinine–1.154)x(age–0.203)x(0.742 if female).11 Exclusion criteria were serum creatinine levels 8 mg/dL, a history of dialysis, multiple myeloma, pulmonary edema, acute myocardial infarction, recent exposure to radiographic contrast within 2 days of the study, pregnancy, and administration of theophylline, dopamine, mannitol, or fenoldopam. The local ethics committee approved the study protocol, and all patients gave written informed consent.
Protocol
After enrollment, patients were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 following treatments: intravenous saline plus NAC administration (saline plus NAC group), intravenous sodium bicarbonate plus NAC administration (bicarbonate plus NAC group), or intravenous saline plus intravenous ascorbic acid plus NAC (saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group). All 3 therapies were instituted both before and after administration of the contrast agent. Isotonic saline (0.90%) was given intravenously at a rate of 1 mL/kg body weight per hour (0.5 mL/kg for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <40%) for 12 hours before and 12 hours after administration of the contrast agent.4,12,13 Patients allocated to the bicarbonate plus NAC group received 154 mEq/L sodium bicarbonate in dextrose and H2O, according to the protocol reported by Merten et al.9 The initial intravenous bolus was 3 mL · kg–1 · h–1 for 1 hour immediately before contrast injection. After this, patients received the same fluid at a rate of 1 mL · kg–1 · h–1 during contrast exposure and for 6 hours after the procedure. Patients allocated to the saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group received 3 g ascorbic acid intravenously 2 hours before followed by 2 g the night and the morning after the procedure.10 We used the intravenous infusion of ascorbic acid because of the low bioavailability after oral administration.
All patients received NAC (Fluimucil, Zambon Group SpA, Milan, Italy) orally at a dose of 1200 mg twice daily on the day before and the day of administration of the contrast agent (total of 2 days).14 Diuretics were routinely withheld on the day of contrast injection.
Serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, sodium, and potassium were measured the day before and 24 and 48 hours after administration of the contrast agent; additional measurements were performed in all cases of deterioration of baseline renal function. The risk score for predicting CIN was calculated according to Mehran et al.15 Urinary pH was measured at the time of enrollment and during treatment (the morning before contrast media administration in the saline plus NAC group, after infusion of the bolus when the patient spontaneously voided in the bicarbonate plus NAC group, and after the first dose in the saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group).
Contrast Agents
Iodixanol (Visipaque, 320 mg iodine/mL, Amersham Health), a nonionic, iso-osmolar (290 mOsm/kg water) contrast agent, was used in all patients. Two different cutoffs were used to identify patients receiving a high-contrast load: 140 mL14 and 5x kilograms of body weight divided by serum creatinine (mg/dL), a weight- and creatinine-adjusted maximum contrast dose.16 This limit was converted to a dichotomous variable by dividing the actual amount of contrast received by the calculated maximum contrast dose to determine the "contrast ratio." If the ratio was >1, then the maximum contrast dose was considered exceeded.16
Study End Points
The primary outcome measure was development of CIN, defined as an increase in the serum creatinine concentration 25% from the baseline value at 48 hours after administration of the contrast media or the need for dialysis.4 Additional efficacy end points included an increase in the serum creatinine concentration 0.5 mg/dL at 48 hours after contrast exposure and a decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate 25% at 48 hours.
Acute renal failure requiring dialysis was defined as a decrease in renal function necessitating acute hemodialysis, ultrafiltration, or peritoneal dialysis within the first 5 days after intervention.
Statistical Analysis
Treatment assignment among the 3 groups was determined by randomization in a 1:1:1 ratio. To ensure that almost equal numbers of patients receive each of the 3 treatments, a randomization block was used (Plan Procedure of SAS, version 8.2, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). The sample size was selected to demonstrate a reduction in the primary end point of CIN from 15% in the saline plus NAC group14,15 to 2% in the bicarbonate plus NAC group and/or saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group.9 With the use of a 2-sided 
2 test with a significance level of 0.05, a total of 288 randomized patients gave the study 90% power.
Continuous variables are represented as mean±SD or as medians (Q1 to Q3). One-way ANOVA test, the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test for repeated measures, and the Mann-Whitney U test for nonrepeated measures were used to determine differences between normal and nonnormally distributed continuous variables, respectively.
Categorical variables were reported as percentages and were analyzed by the 2 or Fisher exact test. Treatment comparisons for the primary end point (CIN) were performed with Fisher exact test. To test the impact of preventive therapy strategy (as defined by the study group) on the creatinine level at 48 hours, we used the ANCOVA model after transforming creatinine levels into natural logarithm (to overcome the problem of the nonnormal distribution). In the ANCOVA, we used as covariates the baseline log-creatinine level and the contrast nephropathy risk score. Familywise levels of P<0.05 were considered significant. Multiplicity issues resulting from the pairwise comparisons were approached with the Bonferroni adjustment (yielding a significance threshold of 0.025). Two-tailed unadjusted probability values are reported throughout this article. Data were analyzed with SPSS 11.0 (SPSS Corp, Chicago, Ill) for Windows.
The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Clinical Characteristics
Between January 2005 and August 2006, 351 patients were randomized to the 3 groups of treatment (Figure 1). A total of 25 patients did not complete the study because they did not have contrast exposure (n=2) or they did not have serum creatinine evaluation 48 hours after contrast exposure (n=23). In all 23 patients, serum creatinine level was assessed within 1 week after contrast exposure; none have developed clinical renal failure, and the creatinine level available at follow-up did not reach the cutoff of an increase
25% from the baseline. Therefore, 326 were analyzed: 111 patients in the saline plus NAC group, 108 patients in the bicarbonate plus NAC group, and 107 patients in the saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group. One hundred seven patients had coronary angiography alone, 73 underwent ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention, 96 had scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention, 21 had peripheral angiography, and 27 had peripheral angioplasty. The clinical and biochemical characteristics of the patients in the 3 groups are shown in Tables 1 and 2
. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the most important clinical and procedural characteristics. Baseline serum creatinine levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and incidence of diabetes mellitus were similar in the 3 groups. The total volume of intravenous hydration was lower in the bicarbonate plus NAC group compared with both the saline plus NAC and saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC groups (bicarbonate plus NAC group, 1081±445 mL; saline plus NAC group, 1562±585 mL; and saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group, 1599±584; P<0.001). The amount of contrast agent administered was similar in the 3 groups (saline plus NAC group, 179±102 mL; bicarbonate plus NAC group, 169±92 mL; and saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group, 169±94 mL; P=0.69). A large volume of contrast dye (defined by both >140 mL and contrast ratio >1) was used in >50% of patients in all 3 groups (Table 1). Mean contrast nephropathy risk score was 
10 in all 3 groups (Table 2). A high (11) risk score occurred in 26 of 111 patients (24%) in the saline plus NAC group, in 39 of 108 patients (36%) in the bicarbonate plus NAC group (P=0.054 versus saline plus NAC group), and in 27 of 104 patients (26%) in the saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group (P=0.75 versus saline plus NAC group). Patients receiving sodium bicarbonate experienced urinary alkalinization. In contrast, in patients in the saline plus NAC group and saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group, nonsignificant changes in urinary pH were observed (Table 2).
|
|
|
Contrast Agent–Induced Nephrotoxicity
Median serum creatinine concentration for all patients was 1.95 mg/dL (range, 1.80 to 2.28 mg/dL). In all 3 groups, the median serum creatinine concentration decreased significantly from baseline to 48 hours after contrast agent administration (P<0.05 for all; Figure 2). The rate of CIN (increase 25% of creatinine concentration) was significantly lower in the bicarbonate plus NAC group (2 of 108 patients, 1.9%) than in the saline plus NAC group (11 of 111 patients, 9.9%; P=0.019; Table 3). In contrast, the rate of CIN was not statistically different between the saline plus NAC group and saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group (11 of 107, 10.3%; P=1.00; Table 3). The additional efficacy end points (ie, an increase 0.5 mg/dL in creatinine concentration and a decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate 25% at 48 hours after contrast exposure) also were observed less often in the bicarbonate plus NAC group than in the saline plus NAC group and saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group (Table 3). Renal failure requiring temporary dialysis occurred in 1 patient in the saline plus NAC group (0.9%), 1 in the bicarbonate plus NAC group (0.9%), and 4 in the saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group (3.8%). A global significant interaction between treatment strategies was observed in the creatinine level 48 hours after adjustment for baseline creatinine level and risk score as covariates (F=3.85; P=0.022 by ANCOVA model).
|
|
Subanalysis of the effectiveness of the 3 preventive strategies was performed according to the following variables: volume of contrast media, risk score, and diabetes mellitus. Rate of CIN was lower in the bicarbonate plus NAC group even in higher-risk subsets (including patients with contrast ratio >1, risk score 11, or diabetes mellitus) (Figure 3).
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The main result of the present study is that the combined administration of sodium bicarbonate plus NAC significantly reduces the risk of CIN in a medium- to high-risk population compared with sodium chloride plus NAC or sodium chloride plus ascorbic acid and NAC.
Contrast media accounts for 10% of all causes of hospital-acquired renal failure.1–3 CIN causes a prolonged in-hospital stay and represents a powerful predictor of poor early and late outcome.1–3 Careful preprocedural stratification has been recommended. The risk score proposed by Mehran et al15 is simple to calculate and very useful for individual patient risk assessment. Most patients enrolled in the trial had a medium to high risk score. The mean risk score was 10, with an expected 14% risk for CIN. Approximately 30% of our population had a risk score 11, with an expected 26% risk for CIN.15 Volume supplementation and the use of a limited amount of low- or iso-osmolality contrast agents are the pivotal recommended strategies for CIN prevention.4 In patients at higher risk, additional efforts should be attempted. Use of NAC, although not recommended, is suggested in this subset of patients.4 The combined approach of sodium bicarbonate plus NAC allow us to satisfy the crucial requirement of volume supplementation and administer a potent antioxidant treatment.
Volume Supplementation
Intravascular volume expansion is usually accomplished by isotonic saline.4 Volume supplementation prevents CIN mostly by the inhibition of arginine-vasopressin (via vagal inputs from the mechanoreceptors located at the AV junctions and by a direct effect of osmolality on the supra-aortic nuclei) and the increase in medullary perfusion and regional PO2.5 In the present study, the total volume of intravenous hydration was lower in the bicarbonate plus NAC group compared with both the saline plus NAC group and saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group. This supports the concept that the mechanism of the effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate in preventing CIN is not likely to be a result of a volume expansion larger than that obtained by isotonic saline.
Antioxidant Therapy
The adverse effects of contrast media on renal function may involve the generation of reactive oxygen species, which may play a role in the effects of various vasoconstrictors.5,17–19 Furthermore, medullary hypoxia promotes mitochondrial generation of reactive oxygen species.20,21 For this reason, clinical trials have been performed using various antioxidant compounds with the aim of lowering the occurrence of CIN by scavenging reactive oxygen species. Three antioxidant approaches have been investigated in most of the studies: NAC, sodium bicarbonate, and ascorbic acid.
NAC may prevent CIN by stopping direct oxidative tissue damage and by improving renal hemodynamics.6–8 The antioxidant effect of NAC seems to be dose dependent.14,22 Although not firmly recommended, NAC administration is suggested especially in high-risk patients.4 Free-radical formation is promoted by an acidic environment typical of tubular urine but is inhibited by the higher pH of normal extracellular fluid.23,24 It has been hypothesized that alkalinizing renal tubular fluid with bicarbonate25 may reduce injury. At physiological concentrations, bicarbonate scavenges peroxynitrite and other reactive species generated from nitric oxide.26 Additional evidence of the effectiveness of an antioxidant strategy comes from the recent observation by Spargias et al,10 who investigated the impact of ascorbic acid in preventing CIN. Ascorbic acid is a potent, water-soluble antioxidant capable of scavenging a wide array of reactive oxygen species that can cause damage to macromolecules such as lipids, DNA, and proteins.27 In addition, ascorbic acid can regenerate other antioxidants, acting as a coantioxidant.27
Could the combination of different antioxidant compounds be more effective than a single agent? The results of the present study support this hypothesis within the boundaries of the trial design, which tested the combination of NAC and another antioxidant agent. Therefore, we can recommend that the combined prophylactic strategy of volume supplementation by sodium bicarbonate plus NAC should be used to prevent CIN in patients at medium to high risk undergoing coronary or peripheral procedures. The lack of a favorable protective effect of the combination of ascorbic acid plus NAC compared with NAC alone suggests additional and/or alternative mechanism(s) (other than antioxidant effect), which require further investigation. We may hypothesize that NAC and ascorbic acid work through similar pathways, whereas the protective action of bicarbonate may be different compared with NAC and therefore additive. The higher amount of HCO3– in the proximal convoluted tubule may buffer the higher amount of H+ as a result of cellular hypoxia and facilitate Na+ reabsorption through the electrogenic Na+/HCO3– cotransporter.28
Study Limitations
The results of the present study cannot be extended to patients at high or very high risk (score 16) for CIN. Furthermore, we did not test the combination of bicarbonate and ascorbic acid. It has been pointed out that the advantage of NAC administration might be based on a decrease in serum creatinine concentration, reflecting either an increase in creatinine excretion or a decrease in creatinine production.29 On the other hand, Izzedine et al30 reported that a therapeutic dose of NAC did not interfere with serum creatinine assays. We did not measure cystatin C, which seems to be a more reliable marker of renal injury.29
Conclusion
The combined strategy of volume supplementation by sodium bicarbonate plus NAC seems to be superior to the association of normal saline plus NAC alone or plus ascorbic acid and NAC in preventing CIN in patients at medium to high risk.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Disclosures
None.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Tepel M, Aspelin P, Lameire N. Contrast-induced nephropathy: a clinical and evidence-based approach. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1799–1806.
2. Gruberg L, Mehran R, Dangas G, Mintz GS, Waksman R, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Wu H, Leon MB. Acute renal failure requiring dialysis after percutaneous coronary interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 2001; 52: 409–416.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. McCullough PA, Wolyn R, Rocher LL, Levin RN, O’Neill WW. Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med. 1997; 103: 368–375.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Solomon R, Deray G. How to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy and manage risk patients: practical recommendations. Kidney Int. 2006; 69: S51–S53.[CrossRef]
5. Persson PB, Hansell P, Liss P. Pathophysiology of contrast-medium induced nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2005; 68: 14–22.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Tepel M, Van der Giet M, Schwarzfeld C, Laufer U, Liermann D, Zidek W. Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 180–184.
7. DiMari J, Megyesi J, Udvarhelyi N, Price P, Davis R, Safirstein R. N-acetylcysteine ameliorates ischemic renal failure. Am J Physiol. 1997; 272: F292–F298.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Tariq M, Morais C, Sobki A, Al Sulaiman M, Al Khader A. N-acetylcysteine attenuates cyclosporin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999; 14: 923–929.
9. Merten GJ, Burgess WP, Gray LV, Holleman JH, Roush RS, Kowalchuk GJ, Bersin RM, Van Moore A, Simonton CA, Rittase RA, Norton HJ, Kennedy TP. Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy with sodium bicarbonate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004; 291: 2328–2334.
10. Spargias K, Alexopoulos E, Kyrzopoulos S, Iokovis P, Greenwood DC, Manginas A, Voudris V, Pavlides G, Buller CE, Kremastinos D, Cokkinos DV. Ascorbic acid prevents contrast-mediated nephropathy in patients with renal dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography or intervention. Circulation. 2004; 110: 2837–2842.
11. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002; 39 (suppl 1): S1–237.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Mueller C, Buerkle G, Buettner HJ, Petersen J, Perruchoud AP, Eriksson U, Marsch S, Roskamm H. Prevention of contrast media-associated nephropathy: randomized comparison of 2 hydration regimens in 1620 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162: 329–336.
13. Solomon R, Werner C, Mann D, D’Alia J, Silva P. Effects of saline, mannitol, and furosemide on acute decreases in renal function induced by radiocontrast agents. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 1416–1420.
14. Briguori C, Colombo A, Violante A, Balestrieri P, Manganelli F, Elia PP, Golia B, Lepore S, Riviezzo G, Scaparto P, Focaccio A, Librera M, Bonizzoni E, Ricciardelli B. Standard versus double dose of N-acetylcysteine to prevent contrast agent associated nephrotoxicity. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25: 206–211.
15. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Moses JW, Stone GW, Leon MB, Dangas G. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 1393–1399.
16. Cigarroa RG, Lange RA, Williams RH, Hillis LD. Dosing of contrast material to prevent contrast nephropathy in patients with renal disease. Am J Med. 1989; 86: 649–652.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Bakris GL, Lass N, Gaber AO, Jones JD, Burnett JC Jr. Radiocontrast medium-induced declines in renal function: a role for oxygen free radicals. Am J Physiol. 1990; 258: F115–F120.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Bakris GL, Gabaer AO, Jones JD. Oxygen free radical involvement in urinary Tamm-Horsfall protein excretion after intrarenal injection of contrast medium. Radiology. 1990; 175: 57–60.
19. Katholi RE, Woods T Jr, Taylor GJ, Deitrick CL, Womack KA, Katholi CR, McCann WP. Oxygen free radicals an contrast nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998; 32: 64–71.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Chandel NS, McClintock DS, Feliciano CE, Wood TM, Melendez JA, Rodriguez AM, Schumacker PT. Reactive oxygen species generated at mitochondrial complex III stabilize hypoxia-inducible factor-1
during hypoxia: a mechanism of O2 sensing. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 25130–25138.
21. Dada LA, Chandel NS, Ridge KM, Pedemonte C, Bertorello AM, Sznajder JI. Hypoxia-induced endocytosis of Na-K-ATPase in alveolar epithelial cells is mediated by mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and PLC-zeta. J Clin Invest. 2003; 111: 1057–1064.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Marenzi G, Assanelli E, Marana I, Lauri G, Campodonico J, Grazi M, De Metrio M, Galli S, Fabbiocchi F, Montorsi P, Veglia F, Bartorelli AL. N-acetylcysteine and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 2773–2782.
23. Alpem RJ. Renal acidification mechanisms. In: Brenner BM, ed. The Kidney. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 2000: 455–519.
24. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Role of free radicals and catalytic metal ions in human diseases: an overview. Methods Enzymol. 1990; 186: 1–85.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Lindinger MI, Franklin TW, Lands LC, Pedersen PK, Welsh DG, Heigenhauser GJ. NaHCO3 and KHCO3 ingestion rapidly increases renal electrolyte excretion in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2000; 88: 540–550.
26. Atkins JL. Effect of sodium bicarbonate preloading on ischemic renal failure. Nephron. 1986; 44: 70–74.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Naidu KA. Vitamin C in human health and disease is still a mystery? An overview. Nutr J. 2003; 2: 7–16.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Boron WF. Acid-base transport by the renal proximal tubule. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 17: 2368–2382.
29. Hoffmann U, Fischereder M, Krueger B, Drobnik W, Kraemer BK. The value of N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of radiocontrast agent-induced nephropathy seems questionable. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004; 15: 407–410.
30. Izzedine H, Guerin V, Launay-Vacher V, Bernad M, Deray G. Effect of N-acetylcysteine on serum creatinine level. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001; 16: 1514–1515.
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
The generation of reactive oxygen species has been considered an important pathophysiological cause of contrast agent–induced nephrotoxicity. We tested whether a combination of different antioxidant compounds may give additive benefit in preventing contrast agent–induced nephrotoxicity. Consecutive patients with chronic kidney disease (serum creatinine 2.0 mg/dL and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 mL · min–1 · 1.73 m–2) were randomly assigned to prophylactic administration of 0.9% saline infusion plus N-acetylcysteine (NAC; n=111), sodium bicarbonate infusion plus NAC (n=108), and 0.9% saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC (n=107). Contrast agent–induced nephrotoxicity occurred in 11 of 111 patients (9.9%) in the saline plus NAC group, in 2 of 108 (1.9%) in the bicarbonate plus NAC group (P=0.019 versus saline plus NAC group), and in 11 of 107 (10.3%) in the saline plus ascorbic acid plus NAC group (P=1.00 versus saline plus NAC group). We can therefore recommend that the combined prophylactic strategy of sodium bicarbonate plus NAC should be used to prevent contrast agent–induced nephrotoxicity in patients at medium to high risk undergoing contrast exposure. The lack of favorable protective effect of the combination of ascorbic acid plus NAC compared with NAC alone suggests additional and/or alternative mechanism(s) (other than antioxidant effect), which require further investigation. We may hypothesize that NAC and ascorbic acid work through similar pathways, whereas the protective action of bicarbonate may be different compared with NAC and therefore additive.
Circulation 2007 115: 1177.
 |
|
 |
|
  N. L. Korpi-Steiner, E. E. Williamson, and B. S. Karon Comparison of Three Whole Blood Creatinine Methods for Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Before Radiographic Contrast Administration Am J Clin Pathol, December 1, 2009; 132(6): 920 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Zoungas, T. Ninomiya, R. Huxley, A. Cass, M. Jardine, M. Gallagher, A. Patel, A. Vasheghani-Farahani, G. Sadigh, and V. Perkovic Systematic Review: Sodium Bicarbonate Treatment Regimens for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Ann Intern Med, November 3, 2009; 151(9): 631 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Spargias, E. Adreanides, E. Demerouti, A. Gkouziouta, A. Manginas, G. Pavlides, V. Voudris, and D. V. Cokkinos Iloprost Prevents Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Renal Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Intervention Circulation, November 3, 2009; 120(18): 1793 - 1799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. R. Brown, C. A. Block, D. J. Malenka, G. T. O'Connor, A. C. Schoolwerth, and C. A. Thompson Sodium Bicarbonate Plus N-Acetylcysteine Prophylaxis: A Meta-Analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., November 1, 2009; 2(11): 1116 - 1124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. H. Endre and J. W. Pickering Outcome definitions in non-dialysis intervention and prevention trials in acute kidney injury (AKI) Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 7, 2009; (2009) gfp501v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Wessely, T. Koppara, C. Bradaric, M. Vorpahl, S. Braun, S. Schulz, J. Mehilli, A. Schomig, A. Kastrati, and for the Contrast Media and Nephrotoxicity Followin Choice of Contrast Medium in Patients With Impaired Renal Function Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Circ Cardiovasc Interv, October 1, 2009; 2(5): 430 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. S. Brar, S. Hiremath, G. Dangas, R. Mehran, S. K. Brar, and M. B. Leon Sodium Bicarbonate for the Prevention of Contrast Induced-Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2009; 4(10): 1584 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. J. Hoste, J. J. De Waele, S. A. Gevaert, S. Uchino, and J. A. Kellum Sodium bicarbonate for prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 23, 2009; (2009) gfp389v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Reed, P. Meier, U. U. Tamhane, K. B. Welch, M. Moscucci, and H. S. Gurm The Relative Renal Safety of Iodixanol Compared With Low-Osmolar Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., July 1, 2009; 2(7): 645 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Mehran, E. Nikolsky, A. J. Kirtane, A. Caixeta, S. C. Wong, P. S. Teirstein, W. E. Downey, W. B. Batchelor, P. J. Casterella, Y.-H. Kim, et al. Ionic Low-Osmolar Versus Nonionic Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media to Obviate Worsening Nephropathy After Angioplasty in Chronic Renal Failure Patients: The ICON (Ionic versus non-ionic Contrast to Obviate worsening Nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients) Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 415 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Lameire, W. van Biesen, E. Hoste, and R. Vanholder The prevention of acute kidney injury an in-depth narrative review: Part 2: Drugs in the prevention of acute kidney injury NDT Plus, February 1, 2009; 2(1): 1 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Goldfarb, P. A. McCullough, J. McDermott, and S. B. Gay Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Specialty-Specific Protocols for Interventional Radiology, Diagnostic Computed Tomography Radiology, and Interventional Cardiology Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2009; 84(2): 170 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. S. Brar, A. Y.-J. Shen, and M. B. Jorgensen Sodium Bicarbonate vs Sodium Chloride in Preventing Contrast Medium-Induced Nephropathy--Reply JAMA, January 28, 2009; 301(4): 379 - 380. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. R. Lattanzio and N. P. Kopyt Acute Kidney Injury: New Concepts in Definition, Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Treatment J Am Osteopath Assoc, January 1, 2009; 109(1): 13 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A. Herzog Kidney disease in cardiology Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 34 - 37. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Lameire, W. Van Biesen, E. Hoste, and R. Vanholder The prevention of acute kidney injury: an in-depth narrative review Part 1: volume resuscitation and avoidance of drug- and nephrotoxin-induced AKI NDT Plus, December 1, 2008; 1(6): 392 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Romano, C. Briguori, C. Quintavalle, C. Zanca, N. V. Rivera, A. Colombo, and G. Condorelli Contrast agents and renal cell apoptosis Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2008; 29(20): 2569 - 2576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. From, B. J. Bartholmai, A. W. Williams, S. S. Cha, and F. S. McDonald Mortality Associated With Nephropathy After Radiographic Contrast Exposure Mayo Clin. Proc., October 1, 2008; 83(10): 1095 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. S. Brar, A. Y.-J. Shen, M. B. Jorgensen, A. Kotlewski, V. J. Aharonian, N. Desai, M. Ree, A. I. Shah, and R. J. Burchette Sodium Bicarbonate vs Sodium Chloride for the Prevention of Contrast Medium-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Trial JAMA, September 3, 2008; 300(9): 1038 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. D. Weisbord, M. K. Mor, A. L. Resnick, K. C. Hartwig, P. M. Palevsky, and M. J. Fine Incidence and Outcomes of Contrast-Induced AKI Following Computed Tomography Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2008; 3(5): 1274 - 1281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Maioli, A. Toso, M. Leoncini, M. Gallopin, D. Tedeschi, C. Micheletti, and F. Bellandi Sodium Bicarbonate Versus Saline for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Renal Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Intervention J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 19, 2008; 52(8): 599 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Baumgarten and J. H. Ellis Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: Contrast Material Not Required? Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 383 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Himmelfarb, M. Joannidis, B. Molitoris, M. Schietz, M. D. Okusa, D. Warnock, F. Laghi, S. L. Goldstein, R. Prielipp, C. R. Parikh, et al. Evaluation and Initial Management of Acute Kidney Injury Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2008; 3(4): 962 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. D. Weisbord, M. K. Mor, A. L. Resnick, K. C. Hartwig, A. F. Sonel, M. J. Fine, and P. M. Palevsky Prevention, Incidence, and Outcomes of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Arch Intern Med, June 23, 2008; 168(12): 1325 - 1332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill The year in interventional cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 17, 2008; 51(24): 2355 - 2369. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. McCullough Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 15, 2008; 51(15): 1419 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Gottlieb and J. A.C. Lima Screening High-Risk Patients With Computed Tomography Angiography Circulation, March 11, 2008; 117(10): 1318 - 1332. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Solomon, M. K. Natarajan, S. Doucet, S. K. Sharma, C. S. Staniloae, R. E. Katholi, J. L. Gelormini, M. Labinaz, and A. E. Moreyra Response to Letters Regarding Article, "Cardiac Angiography in REnally Impaired Patients (CARE) Study: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease" Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): e167 - e167. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A. Herzog Kidney disease in cardiology Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 42 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. From, B. J. Bartholmai, A. W. Williams, S. S. Cha, A. Pflueger, and F. S. McDonald Sodium Bicarbonate is Associated with an Increased Incidence of Contrast Nephropathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 7977 Patients at Mayo Clinic Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 10 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. D. Weisbord and P. M. Palevsky Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy with Volume Expansion Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 273 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Fishbane N-Acetylcysteine in the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 281 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. R. Rudnick, S. Goldfarb, and J. Tumlin Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: Is the Picture any Clearer? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2008; 3(1): 261 - 262. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F.M. Wetzels Letter by Wetzels Regarding Article, "Renal Insufficiency Following Contrast Media Administration Trial (REMEDIAL): A Randomized Comparison of 3 Preventive Strategies" Circulation, August 21, 2007; 116(8): e310 - e310. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Briguori, D. D'Andrea, A. Focaccio, B. Ricciardelli, F. Airoldi, N. Morici, I. Michev, M. Montorfano, M. Carlino, J. Cosgrave, et al. Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Renal Insufficiency Following Contrast Media Administration Trial (REMEDIAL): A Randomized Comparison of 3 Preventive Strategies" Circulation, August 21, 2007; 116(8): e311 - e311. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Solomon Contrast media nephropathy--how to diagnose and how to prevent? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1812 - 1815. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Solomon, M. K. Natarajan, S. Doucet, S. K. Sharma, C. S. Staniloae, R. E. Katholi, J. L. Gelormini, M. Labinaz, A. E. Moreyra, and the Investigators of the CARE Study Cardiac Angiography in Renally Impaired Patients (CARE) Study: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Circulation, June 26, 2007; 115(25): 3189 - 3196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Strategies for Preventing Contrast-Media-Induced Renal Insufficiency Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, April 20, 2007; 2007(420): 3 - 3. [Full Text]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||