| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2006;114:414-421.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Molecular Cardiology |
From the Departments of Intensive Care Medicine (P.P., M.J.D., M.P.W.J.M.B., J.G.v.d.H.) and Pharmacology-Toxicology (P.S.), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Correspondence to P. Pickkers, Department of Intensive Care Medicine (551), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, GeertGrooteplein 10, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, Netherlands. E-mail p.pickkers{at}ic.umcn.nl
Received September 22, 2005; revision received May 5, 2006; accepted May 26, 2006.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results Volunteers received 2 ng/kg Escherichia coli endotoxin intravenously. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured with venous occlusion plethysmography. Infusion of 4 dose steps of norepinephrine into the brachial artery decreased the FBF ratio (ratio of FBF in the experimental arm to FBF in the control arm) to 84±4%, 70±4%, 55±4%, and 38±4% (mean±SEM) of its baseline value. After endotoxin administration, norepinephrine-induced vasoconstriction was attenuated (FBF ratio, 101±4%, 92±4%, 83±6%, and 56±7%; n=30; P=0.0018; pooled data). Intrabrachial infusion of the K-channel blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA) completely restored the vasoconstrictor response to norepinephrine from 104±5%, 93±7%, 93±12%, and 69±12% to 89±9%, 73±4%, 59±5%, and 46±8% (n=6; P=0.045). Other K-channel blockers did not affect the response to norepinephrine. The NO synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; 0.2 mg · min1 · dL1 intra-arterially) also restored the norepinephrine sensitivity. In the presence of L-NMMA, TEA did not have an additional effect on the norepinephrine-induced vasoconstriction (n=6; P=0.9).
Conclusions The K-channel blocker TEA restores the attenuated vasoconstrictor response to norepinephrine during experimental human endotoxemia. Coadministration of L-NMMA abolishes this potentiating effect of TEA, suggesting that NO mediates the endotoxin-induced effect on vascular K channels. In the absence of an effect of the selective adenosine triphosphatedependent K-channel blocker tolbutamide, we conclude that the blunting effect of endotoxin on norepinephrine-induced vasoconstriction is caused by NO-mediated activation of calcium-activated K channels in the vascular wall.
Key Words: inflammation ion channels nitric oxide synthase pharmacology regional blood flow vasoconstriction
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Perspective p 421
Increased synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) and activation of vascular potassium (K) channels4 represent 2 pathways that appear to play an important role in the dysregulation of vascular tone in septic patients. Although it has been demonstrated that increased expression of inducible NO synthase is detectable only at the site of infection,5 systemic administration of its inhibitor, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), results in a rise in blood pressure and an increase in sensitivity to vasopressor drugs.6
Simultaneously, several inflammatory mediators may lead to activation of vascular K channels. Opening of vascular K channels hyperpolarizes the membrane of vascular smooth muscle cells, leading to closure of voltage-operated calcium channels and vasorelaxation. Moreover, activation of vascular K channels is associated with an attenuated response to vasoconstrictors,7 and persistent membrane hyperpolarization by K-channel activation appears to account for much of the observed vascular hyporeactivity of septic shock.7,8 Of the several subtypes of K channels present in the vascular wall, activation of the calcium-activated (KCa) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)dependent (KATP) K channels are associated with inflammation-induced vascular hyporeactivity.
Animal experiments have demonstrated that administration of K-channel blockers during sepsis results in an increase in blood pressure, an increase in vasopressor sensitivity, and even a reduction in mortality.912 Interestingly, NO is one of the mediators that activates the KCa channel during inflammation.9,13,14
Acute systemic inflammation can be induced by a low-dose infusion of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in healthy volunteers, resulting in changes in cardiovascular function comparable to those observed in sepsis.15,16 Human data concerning the role of NO during inflammation are limited, and no human data are available concerning the role of vascular K-channel activation.
In the present study, we quantified the effect of LPS infusion on the vasoconstrictor response to norepinephrine in the human forearm vasculature in the absence and presence of K-channel blockade and NO synthase inhibition. The study addresses 3 questions: Is it possible to restore the vascular hyporeactivity to norepinephrine during human endotoxemia by pharmacological K-channel blockade? Which vascular K channel (KCa or KATP) is involved? And finally, is the activation of the vascular K channels during human endotoxemia mediated by NO?
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Design of Human Endotoxemia Experiments
After local anesthesia (lidocaine HCL 20 mg/mL), the brachial artery was cannulated with a 20-gauge catheter connected to an arterial pressure monitoring line (Siemens SC9000, Den Haag, The Netherlands). The arterial line was used to administer drugs (norepinephrine, K-channel blockers, L-NMMA), to monitor blood pressure, and to sample blood.
Heart rate and blood pressure monitoring started
2 hours before LPS administration and was continued until the end of the experiment. A second cannula was placed in a deep antecubital vein for prehydration (1.5 L of 2.5% glucose/0.45% saline solution in the hour before the administration of LPS) and LPS administration. All subjects received 150 mL/h 2.5% glucose/0.45% saline solution during the first 6 hours after the LPS administration and 75 mL/h until the end of the experiment.
At 0 hours, purified endotoxin (LPS) prepared from E coli O:113 was injected (2 ng/kg IV) in 1 minute. LPS in the current dose attenuates the vasoconstrictor response to adrenergic16 and other vasoconstrictors.17
The course of body temperature was determined every 30 minutes for the first 6 hours after LPS administration with an infrared tympanic thermometer (Sherwood Medical, s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands).
Laboratory Tests
Blood samples were taken to determine the time course and peak values per individual. Total leukocytes and C-reactive protein values were measured before LPS administration and at 1, 6, 12, and 22 hours after LPS with standard laboratory techniques. To determine the concentration of the various cytokines, plasma was processed immediately by centrifugation at 2000g at 4°C for 15 minutes and was stored at 80°C before analyses. Concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-
, interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-10, and interferon-
were determined in samples taken at baseline and at 60 and 90 minutes and 2, 3, and 4 hours after LPS administration with simultaneous Luminex assay.18
Forearm Blood Flow Measurements
Forearm blood flow (FBF) was determined in both forearms with venous occlusion plethysmography (Filtrass Domed, Munich, Germany) as previously described.19,20 Briefly, venous occlusion was achieved by inflating the upper arm cuffs to 45 mm Hg. Strain gauges were placed on the forearms and connected to plethysmographs to measure changes in forearm volume in response to inflation of the venous-congesting cuffs. FBF and drug administration were normalized to forearm volume as measured with the water displacement method and expressed in milliliters per minute per deciliter forearm volume (mL · min1 · dL1).
Norepinephrine Dose Response
After instrumentation of both arms and an equilibration period of 30 minutes, the vasoconstrictor response to infusion of norepinephrine into the brachial artery was quantified by measuring FBF, as illustrated in Figure 1. Each dose-response curve started with a 5-minute period of baseline measurements, followed by intra-arterial norepinephrine infusion at 1 to 3 ng · min1 · dL1 to 10 to 30 ng · min1 · dL1 (5 minutes per dose).
|
Four hours after LPS administration, the norepinephrine dose-response curve was repeated to determine the LPS-induced effects on norepinephrine sensitivity. Thereafter, at 5 hours, without selection or formal randomization, one of the following protocols was applied.
Protocol 1: Time Control Experiments With Norepinephrine During Endotoxemia
Time control experiments were carried out in 6 subjects to investigate the repeatability of the vasopressor response to norepinephrine. To this end, the norepinephrine dose-response curve was repeated once more at 5 hours with NaCl 0.9% as the "placebo" pharmacological intervention.
Protocol 2: Effect of Various K-Channel Blockers on Norepinephrine Sensitivity During Endotoxemia
We used the K-channel blockers quinine, tetraethylammonium (TEA), and tolbutamide to investigate the role of KCa and KATP channel activation. Using the perfused forearm technique, we have previously demonstrated that these blockers inhibit the vasodilator response to activation of KCa21 and KATP22 channels.
In 3 groups of 6 subjects, the norepinephrine dose-response curve was repeated at 5 hours during continued intra-arterial infusion of TEA (1 mg · min1 · dL1), quinine (50 µg · min1 · dL1), or the selective KATP blocker tolbutamide (1 mg · min1 · dL1).
Protocol 3: Effects of NO Synthase Inhibitor L-NMMA and Coinfusion of K-Channel Blocker TEA on Norepinephrine Sensitivity During Endotoxemia
To determine whether the effect of TEA was induced through a direct effect of LPS/cytokines on the vascular K channels or whether this effect was mediated by NO, we infused the NO synthase inhibitor L-NMMA (0.2 mg · min1 · dL1) intra-arterially in another 6 subjects at 5 hours. After 5 minutes of infusion, the effects of L-NMMA on FBF were determined. During continued L-NMMA infusion, a norepinephrine dose-response curve was determined as described above.
In this group, the experiment was extended to study the effect of combining TEA and L-NMMA. After a 30-minute washout period (6 hours), L-NMMA and TEA were coinfused to assess whether there is an additional effect of K-channel blockade during NO synthase inhibition.
Protocol 4: Effect of K-Channel Blockers and NO Inhibition on Norepinephrine Sensitivity in the Absence of Endotoxemia
To assess the effect of intra-arterial administration of TEA and L-NMMA on the norepinephrine dose-response curve, 6 experiments without LPS administration were conducted. Study design was identical to that of the endotoxemia experiments. Because of the long half-life of L-NMMA, a crossover design could not be applied; therefore, L-NMMA always was infused last.
A norepinephrine dose-response curve was determined using the same method as in the endotoxemia experiments. After 30 minutes, intra-arterial TEA infusion (1 mg · min1 · dL1) was started, and its effects on FBF were assessed. During continued TEA infusion, the norepinephrine dose-response was repeated. After another 30-minute washout period, intra-arterial L-NMMA infusion (0.2 mg · min1 · dL1) was started. After determining the FBF response to L-NMMA, we repeated the norepinephrine dose-response curve as described above.
Drugs and Solutions
All solutions were freshly prepared on the day of the experiment. Endotoxin (US Standard Reference Endotoxin E coli O:113, USP, Rockville, Md), norepinephrine (1 mg/mL, Centrafarm, Etten-Leur, the Netherlands), quinine dihydrochloride (300 mg/mL, Dagra Pharma, Diemen, the Netherlands), tolbutamide (10 mg/mL, Clinical Pharmacy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands), and L-NMMA (100 mg ampoules, Clinalfa, Laufenflingen, Switzerland) were all dissolved in 0.9% NaCl. On the day of the experiment, TEA was reconstituted from a sterile powder (Sigma, St Louis, Mo), diluted in NaCl 0.9% to a concentration of 1 mg/mL, and passed through a 0.22-µm Millipore (Millipore, Milford, Mass) filter.
Data Analysis, Calculations, and Statistics
Measurement of the FBF in the noninfused arm was used as a contemporaneous time control for the infused arm so that systemic effects could be observed and vasoactive effects could be expressed as a quotient of the infused and the noninfused arm. According to the literature, the FBF ratio is the optimal approach to analyze data from this kind of research.23 Baseline infused-to-noninfused forearm ratio was defined at 100%.
The effects of quinine, TEA, tolbutamide, L-NMMA, and coinfusion of L-NMMA and TEA are expressed in absolute FBF (mL · min1 · dL1). Norepinephrine-induced changes in FBF are expressed as percent flow change. FBF data are the mean of the measurements obtained during the last 2 minutes of each infusion period (steady state).
The mean arterial pressure and heart rate were sampled every 5 minutes throughout the experiments. To determine the systemic effects of the LPS infusion, the group averages before the start of baseline measurements and the group averages at 4 hours are expressed.
The primary end point of this study is the effect of pharmacological interventions (K-channel blockade and NO inhibition) on norepinephrine-induced vasoconstriction in the human forearm vasculature during systemic inflammation. Using NQuery 6.0 (Statistical Solutions Ltd, Cork, Ireland), we calculated sample size for a univariate 1-way repeated-measures ANOVA with constant correlation. The computer program was used with a number of levels of 4 (norepinephrine infusion rates), an estimated standard deviation of 20% with a correlation of 0.5, a desired power of 80%, and an estimated standard deviation of 10% to 15% of the expected means of differences. With this approach, sample sizes of 4 to 7 were needed to demonstrate a difference between the repeated measures before compared with after intervention. Therefore, we chose to include 6 individuals in each group. LPS-induced changes in clinical, inflammatory, and hemodynamic parameters were determined to demonstrate that the inflammatory stimulus was adequate.
Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests indicated a normal distribution of data. LPS-induced effects (pooled n=30) and the effects of all pharmacological interventions in the forearm were tested for significance with repeated-measures ANOVA. Paired data (within subjects, comparison of before and after intervention) were assessed with the Student t test. All data are expressed as mean±SEM unless otherwise specified. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The authors had full access to the data and take full responsibility for their integrity. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Changes in Clinical, Inflammatory, and Hemodynamic Parameters
LPS administration induced the expected and transient flulike symptoms. Body temperature increased from 36.4±0.1°C to 38.0±0.1°C at 4 hours (P<0.0001, repeated-measures ANOVA), and white blood cell count decreased from 5.9±0.3 to 2.1±0.1x109/L at 1 hour after LPS administration, after which there was an increase to 13.4±0.6 and 13.7±0.6x109/L at 6 and 12 hours, respectively (P<0.0001, repeated-measures ANOVA). C-reactive protein was below the detection limit at baseline, increasing to 5.6±1.2 mg/dL at 6 hours, 23.0±1.8 mg/dL at 12 hours, and 35.1±2.4 mg/dL at 22 hours after the injection of LPS (P<0.0001, repeated-measures ANOVA). All plasma cytokine concentrations increased significantly after the administration of LPS (Figure 2).
|
The hemodynamic response to LPS is characterized by a significant decrease in blood pressure, rise in heart rate, and increase in FBF (Table 2). As illustrated in Figure 3, intrabrachial infusion of norepinephrine induced a dose-dependent vasoconstrictor effect that was impaired 4 hours after the administration of LPS (P=0.0018, repeated-measures ANOVA between dose-response curves; n=30).
|
|
Protocol 1: Time Control Experiments With Norepinephrine During Endotoxemia
In this group, FBF was 4.0±0.8 before and 8.7±2.4 mL · min1 · dL1 after the administration of LPS. Figure 4A illustrates that with no pharmacological intervention the impaired vasoconstrictor response to norepinephrine is similar at 4 hours and 5 hours (P=nonsignificant [NS], repeated-measures ANOVA), indicating good repeatability of the impaired norepinephrine dose-response curve at 5 hours after the administration of LPS.
|
Protocol 2: Effect of Various K-Channel Blockers on Norepinephrine Sensitivity During Endotoxemia
In the quinine group, LPS increased FBF from 2.6±0.3 to 5.8±1.1 mL · min1 · dL1. As illustrated in Figure 4B, quinine did not change the norepinephrine sensitivity (P=NS). In the tolbutamide group, baseline FBF averaged 2.3±0.3 mL · min1 · dL1, which increased to 6.4±1.1 mL · min1 · dL1 after the administration of LPS. Intrabrachial infusion of the KATP blocker tolbutamide had no effect on norepinephrine sensitivity (P=NS; Figure 4C). Both quinine and tolbutamide had no direct effect on FBF, blood pressure, or heart rate (data not shown).
Administration of LPS increased FBF from 2.6±0.5 to 5.8±1.3 mL · min1 · dL1 in the TEA group. Intrabrachial administration of TEA at 4 hours after LPS administration did not change the FBF in the infused arm (from 5.8±1.3 to 5.5±1.7 mL · min1 · dL1; P=NS). Figure 5A shows the potentiating effect of TEA on the LPS-impaired norepinephrine dose-response curve (P=0.045, repeated-measures ANOVA). Intrabrachial administration of TEA did not significantly change the contralateral FBF (6.1±1.0 to 5.7±1.1 mL · min1 · dL1), blood pressure (109±4/59±2 to 106±5/60±2 mm Hg), or heart rate (92±5 to 89±5 bpm).
|
Protocol 3: Effects of NO Synthase Inhibitor L-NMMA and Coinfusion of K-Channel Blocker TEA on Norepinephrine Sensitivity During Endotoxemia
Figure 5B shows the norepinephrine dose-response curve in the presence of the NO synthase inhibitor L-NMMA. In this group, FBF increased from 2.8±0.6 mL · min1 · dL1 at baseline to 6.3±0.9 mL · min1 · dL1 after the administration of LPS. Intrabrachial administration of L-NMMA reduced FBF to 3.5±0.8 mL · min1 · dL1 (P<0.005, paired t test), with no significant changes in the contralateral arm (6.2±1.1 to 5.8±1.2 mL · min1 · dL1), blood pressure (126±4/67±2 to 123±2/68±1 mm Hg), or heart rate (92±4 to 88±4 bpm). L-NMMA significantly restored the attenuated vasoconstrictor response to norepinephrine (P=0.009, repeated-measures ANOVA). The subsequent norepinephrine dose-response curve in the presence of both L-NMMA and TEA demonstrated that TEA does not exert an additional potentiating effect in the presence of L-NMMA.
Protocol 4: Effect of K-Channel Blockers and NO Inhibition on Norepinephrine Sensitivity in the Absence of Endotoxemia
Norepinephrine (1 to 3 · min1 · dL1 to 10 to 30 ng · min1 · dL1) -induced vasoconstriction was 98±11%, 86±11%, 56±9%, and 31±5%. Intrabrachial infusion of TEA did not change FBF (from 3.6±0.7 to 2.8±0.8 mL · min1 · dL1; P=NS) and did not alter the sensitivity to norepinephrine (in the presence of TEA, 92±11%, 106±20%, 86±14%, and 52±15%; P=NS) in the absence of endotoxemia.
Intrabrachial infusion of L-NMMA decreased FBF from 3.3±1.7 to 1.9±0.6 mL · min1 · dL1 (P<0.01), with no significant changes in the FBF of the control forearm, blood pressure, and heart rate (data not shown). The norepinephrine-induced vasoconstriction in the presence of L-NMMA also was not significantly different from the baseline dose-response curve (in the presence of L-NMMA, 84±14%, 56±9%, 50±10%, and 35±12%).
During the preparation of this manuscript, additional experiments with LPS and TEA using the same protocol as in the present study were conducted. In the group of 10 subjects, the probability value of the TEA-mediated improvement of the norepinephrine vasoconstriction was 0.015.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our findings on LPS-induced vasodilation and hyporeactivity to norepinephrine confirm previous reports using the human endotoxemia model.16,17 Pleiner et al16 demonstrated that infusion of LPS produced a systemic hypotensive and inflammatory reaction that was associated with a reduced sensitivity to adrenoceptor agonists. However, this profound reduction in adrenoceptor-mediated constriction was not associated with an altered effect of NO synthase inhibition because local L-NMMA administration did not lead to a more pronounced vasoconstriction during endotoxemia compared with control circumstances. In the present study, we found that intra-arterial administration of L-NMMA does potentiate the vasopressor response to norepinephrine. This may suggest that LPS-induced vasodilatation and the development of hypotension/vasodilation on one hand and the induction of vascular LPS-induced hyporeactivity to norepinephrine on the other hand may reflect different mechanisms. Our observation that NO inhibition does not potentiate the vasoconstrictor response to norepinephrine under control circumstances (in the absence of LPS) is consistent with a previous report.24
Of course, this observed effect of L-NMMA does not necessarily imply that NO synthase inhibition is beneficial in septic patients. Although systemic treatment of patients with septic shock resulted in a significant rise in blood pressure,6 this was unfortunately associated with an increase in mortality in a randomized clinical trial.25 Both the fact that L-NMMA is a nonselective NO synthase inhibitor that blocks inducible and endothelial NO synthase and the dosage of L-NMMA used in that clinical trial may have accounted for the observed detrimental effects.
K-Channel Activation During Inflammation
Persistent membrane hyperpolarization by K-channel activation appears to account for much of the observed vascular hyporeactivity of septic shock.7,8 Charybdotoxin, a selective blocker of KCa channels, restores LPS-induced vascular hyporeactivity in isolated blood vessels, whereas glibenclamide, a selective antagonist of KATP channels, is not effective in vitro.9,26 In contrast, KATP blockers increase blood pressure during experimental septic shock in various in vivo animal models.11,12 Thus, from animal experiments, there is good evidence that K-channel blockers are beneficial in the treatment of vasodilatory shock, leading to an increase in blood pressure, an increase in vasopressor sensitivity, and even a reduction in mortality.912 We have previously demonstrated that vasodilation associated with pharmacological K-channel activation by diazoxide is associated with a distinct blunting of the vasoconstrictor response to norepinephrine in humans.22 In addition, we found that concurrent administration of the K-channel blocker TEA could reduce the diazoxide-mediated vasodilation, indicating that pharmacological modulation of vascular K channels may provide a novel treatment opportunity.22 Nevertheless, until now, the role of K-channel activation during systemic inflammation in humans was unknown. Our results on the LPS-induced attenuated norepinephrine sensitivity and its restoration by TEA in humans are consistent with previous data showing full reversal of hyperpolarization27 and hyporeactivity27,28 by TEA in isolated vessels. Because TEA is a nonselective blocker of both KCa and KATP channels, the experiments with TEA do not differentiate between these 2 vascular K channels. Because the selective KATP blocker tolbutamide showed no potentiating effect, however, we have to conclude that vascular KCa channels mediate the vascular hyporesponsiveness to norepinephrine during human endotoxemia. This observation is in accordance with various in vitro studies that demonstrate involvement of the KCa channel, and not the KATP channel, with the use of TEA8,9 or highly specific KCa channel blockers like charybdotoxin8,9 and iberiotoxin.29 The absence of a potentiating effect of quinine may well be explained by its rather poor specificity because quinine also acts as an
-adrenergic blocking agent.30 The fact that the vasoconstrictor response to various agonists (norepinephrine, angiotensin II, vasopressin) is attenuated during endotoxemia17 supports the idea that the final common pathway is affected (influx of calcium and an increase in intracellular calcium), and not the specific receptors or specific signaling pathways for the aforementioned vasoconstrictor substances. Thus, it is likely that TEA also will improve the vasoconstrictor response to angiotensin II and vasopressin because the action of these agents is also dependent of calcium influx from voltage-operated Ca channels, of which the open-state probability is mediated predominantly by K channels. Moreover, our control experiments performed in subjects who did not receive LPS demonstrate that TEA does not potentiate the norepinephrine response in the absence of systemic inflammation, indicating that the potentiating effect of TEA is not due to a direct interaction with the vascular
-receptor.
The intracellular signaling by which K channels are activated during human endotoxemia is largely unknown. Because K-channel blockade with TEA did not exert an additional effect during NO synthase inhibition, NO may be responsible for the activation of the vascular K channels. Interestingly, apart from direct activation by high concentrations of LPS,31 patch-clamp experiments have shown that NO can directly13 and indirectly (through guanylate cyclase)14 activate single vascular KCa channels. The NO-mediated pathway appears plausible because LPS is cleared from the bloodstream within 20 minutes during experimental human endotoxemia and because cytokines do not activate vascular K channels or directly dilate human vessels.32
Recently, Singer and colleagues33 reported that life-threatening complications related to K-channelopening drugs subsided after the administration of the K-channel blocker glibenclamide. Glibenclamide appeared to be effective in several cases, but not in septic shock. Our data confirm this observation of Singer et al that selective KATP blockade with sulfonylurea derivatives (tolbutamide, glibenclamide) may not be helpful in the hemodynamic management of septic shock. According to our data, other K-channel blockers like TEA may be more effective.
Therapeutic Implications
In the past, TEA was used as an antihypertensive drug because of its ganglion-blocking properties.34 This effect is not confounding the data in the present study because we infused the drug into the brachial artery, distal of the sympathetic ganglia. On the basis of its ganglion-blocking properties, systemic administration of TEA may have a blood pressurelowering effect in septic patients with an activated sympathetic system, which may limit its use in this specific group of patients. However, systemic administration of TEA in normotensive patients did not lower blood pressure.35 In experimental animals, systemic treatment with TEA during endotoxic shock in rats did not deteriorate the LPS-induced fall in blood pressure,36 and intravenously administered TEA fully restored the responsiveness to phenylephrine in rats injected with LPS.37 Although the data are limited, these results are encouraging and suggest that TEA may represent a possible future therapeutic opportunity to modulate vascular tone in septic shock patients. The next step to explore the potential therapeutic properties of K-channel blockers in vasodilatory shock would be systemic administration of TEA during experimental endotoxemia or in septic patients.
Conclusions
Our experiments indicate that NO-mediated activation of KCa channels is responsible for the observed hyporeactivity to norepinephrine during human endotoxemia and confirm in vitro and animal data that pharmacological inhibition of vascular K channels restores the attenuated norepinephrine sensitivity during systemic inflammation. Pharmacological modulation of vascular K channels represents a novel treatment modality for septic shock.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Source of Funding
Dr Pickkers has received a Clinical Fellowship grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (ZonMw).
Disclosures
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. H. Clapp and N. N. Orie Stoking Up BKCa Channels in Hemorrhagic Shock: Which Channel Subunit Is Really Fueling the Fire? Circ. Res., August 31, 2007; 101(5): 436 - 438. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H.J.M. Kemna, H. Tjalsma, V. N. Podust, and D. W. Swinkels Mass Spectrometry-Based Hepcidin Measurements in Serum and Urine: Analytical Aspects and Clinical Implications Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 620 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |