Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;114:2261-2270
Published online before print November 6, 2006, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.631465
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
114/21/2261    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.631465v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Losordo, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Losordo, D. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRADIOL
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack
Related Collections
Right arrow Angiogenesis
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies

(Circulation. 2006;114:2261-2270.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Molecular Cardiology

Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and ß Mediate Contribution of Bone Marrow–Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells to Functional Recovery After Myocardial Infarction

Hiromichi Hamada, MD, PhD; Myeong Kon Kim, MD; Atsushi Iwakura, MD, PhD; Masaaki Ii, MD, PhD; Tina Thorne, MS; Gangjian Qin, MD; Jun Asai, MD; Yoshiaki Tsutsumi, MD, PhD; Haruki Sekiguchi, MD; Marcy Silver, MS; Andrea Wecker, BS; Evelyn Bord, BS; Yan Zhu, PhD; Raj Kishore, PhD; Douglas W. Losordo, MD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Research, St Elizabeth Medical Center of Boston, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (H.H., M.K.K., A.I., M.I., T.T., G.Q., J.A., Y.T., H.S., M.S., A.W., E.B., Y.Z., R.K., D.W.L.), and Stem Cell Translational Research, Kobe Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation/RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, Japan (M.I.).

Correspondence to Douglas W. Losordo, MD, Cardiovascular Research, Caritas St. Elizabeth Medical Center of Boston, 736 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02135. E-mail douglas.losordo{at}tufts.edu

Received April 3, 2006; revision received July 6, 2006; accepted August 11, 2006.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background— Estradiol (E2) modulates the kinetics of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and favorably affects neovascularization after ischemic injury. However, the roles of estrogen receptors {alpha} (ER{alpha}) and ß (ERß) in EPC biology are largely unknown.

Methods and Results— In response to E2, migration, tube formation, adhesion, and estrogen-responsive element–dependent gene transcription activities were severely impaired in EPCs obtained from ER{alpha}-knockout mice (ER{alpha}KO) and moderately impaired in ERßKO EPCs. The number of ER{alpha}KO EPCs (42.4±1.5; P<0.001) and ERßKO EPCs (55.4±1.8; P=0.03) incorporated into the ischemic border zone was reduced as compared with wild-type (WT) EPCs (72.5±1.3). In bone marrow transplantation (BMT) models, the number of mobilized endogenous EPCs in E2-treated mice was significantly reduced in ER{alpha}KO BMT (WT mice transplanted with ER{alpha}KO bone marrow) (2.03±0.18%; P=0.004 versus WT BMT) and ERßKO BMT (2.62±0.07%; P=0.02 versus WT) compared with WT BMT (2.87±0.13%) (WT to WT BMT as control) mice. Capillary density at the border zone of ischemic myocardium also was significantly reduced in ER{alpha}KO BMT and ERßKO BMT compared with WT mice (WT BMT, 1718±75/mm2; ER{alpha}KO BMT, 1107±48/mm2; ERßKO BMT, 1567±50/mm2). ER{alpha} mRNA was expressed more abundantly on EPCs compared with ERß. Moreover, vascular endothelial growth factor was significantly downregulated on ER{alpha}KO EPCs compared with WT EPCs both in vitro and in vivo.

Conclusions— Both ER{alpha} and ERß contribute to E2-mediated EPC activation and tissue incorporation and to preservation of cardiac function after myocardial infarction. ER{alpha} plays a more prominent role in this process. Moreover, ER{alpha} contributes to upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor, revealing possible mechanisms of an effect of E2 on EPC biology. Finally, these data provide additional evidence of the importance of bone marrow–derived EPC phenotype in ischemic tissue repair.


Key Words: angiogenesis • bone marrow cells • hormones • myocardial infarction • receptors, estrogen


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Clinical and experimental evidence suggests that estrogen plays important roles in physiological and pathological angiogenesis. In adult organisms, angiogenesis is virtually absent under normal conditions except in the female reproductive tract. The role of estrogen in uterine angiogenesis has been demonstrated by findings in the estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha})–knockout (KO) mouse, in which angiogenesis is impaired, and by the demonstration that ER antagonists can inhibit angiogenesis.1 The positive correlation between ER expression, angiogenic activity, and breast tumor invasiveness also supports the angiogenic effect of estrogen mediated by estrogen receptors,2–4 In addition, the estrogen metabolite 2-methoxyestradiol has been shown to be a potent antiangiogenic agent.5

Editorial p 2203

Clinical Perspective p 2270

Vascular endothelial cells express at least 2 estrogen receptors: ER{alpha}6,7 and ERß.8 Estrogen enhances endothelial cell activities in vitro1,9 and has favorable effects on ischemic neovascularization in vivo.10,11 In human studies, it was reported that postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy was associated with reduced risk of mortality after myocardial infarction (MI).12

Tissue ischemia induces upregulation of angiogenic growth factors and mobilization of circulating cellular elements that together enable development of an accessory vasculature for organ survival. Recently, endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) isolated from peripheral blood have been shown to incorporate into foci of neovascularization in the adult, ie, postnatal vasculogenesis.13,14 These circulating EPCs are derived from bone marrow and mobilized endogenously in response to tissue ischemia or exogenously by cytokine stimulation.15–18

Previous findings have suggested that estrogen also could augment the recruitment of EPCs for vascular repair.11,19,20 Our laboratory showed that the effects of estrogen on EPC recruitment in vascular repair were endothelial nitric oxide synthase dependent.11,20 However, the potential role of estrogen receptor in EPC recruitment for myocardial microvascular repair has not been studied. In this study, we investigated the roles of ER{alpha} and ERß in estrogen-induced, EPC-mediated tissue repair in the setting of acute MI.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cell Culture
Mononuclear cells were isolated from mouse bone marrow and plated for EPCs as described previously21,22 and in the online Data Supplement. The rationale for using a culture method to enrich the EPC fraction of bone marrow cells is as follows: For phenotyping and assessing gene expression, circulating cells in the mouse are too scarce, thus mandating the use of a more abundant source of cells. A method has been developed and used repeatedly in our laboratory (and in multiple peer-reviewed publications15,16,23) that favors the growth of cells with endothelial lineage capability while diminishing the non-EPC population. Medium was replaced with phenol red–free medium (EBM, Camblex, Walkersville, Md) with 5% charcoal-dextran–treated fetal bovine serum (Biosource, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif) at day 5 to remove the effects of estrogen-like activity of phenol red and estrogen derived from the serum. After 2 days in further culture, the cells were used as an EPC-rich cell population for cell function studies and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

In Vitro Cell Function Assays (Proliferation, Migration, Tube Formation, and Adhesion Activity)
Cell proliferation was assessed by [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA as described before.24 Migration was measured in a modified Boyden’s chamber. Tube formation assay was performed as described before using Matrigel-Matrix (BD Biosciences, San Jose, Calif).25 The adhesion assay is described in the Data Supplement.

Animals
All mice used in this study were handled in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee at St Elizabeth’s Medical Center of Boston (Mass). Female C57BL/6J mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine) were used as WT mice. Full details about ER{alpha}-null mutant mice and ERß-null mutant mice were given recently.26 In ER{alpha}-null mutant mice, exon 3 of ER{alpha} was deleted, and no ER{alpha} proteins were found in this strain. In ERß-null mutant mice, exon 3 of ERß was deleted, and no ERß proteins were found in this strain. These mice are of C57BL/6 background.

Bone Marrow Transplantation Model
Female C57BL/6J mice 9 to 10 weeks old were studied. Mice underwent ovariectomy on day –35, followed by bone marrow transplantation (BMT) at day –28. WT, ER{alpha}KO, or ERßKO mice 8 to 12 weeks old were used as donors of the bone marrow. The BMT procedure was performed as described previously.16,21 At day –7, by which time the bone marrow of the recipient mice was reconstituted, BMT mice received either 17b-estradiol (E2) pellets (Innovative Research of America, Sarasota, Fla) or placebo-containing pellets implanted subcutaneously into the dorsal neck region of the animals. To achieve typical E2 levels found at mid-cycle, a 90-day release pellet containing 1.7 mg E2 was used. Circulating E2 levels in mice with the E2 pellets and in mice with the placebo pellets were previously reported.20 Seven days later (day 0), animals underwent MI surgery.

Surgical Procedure
MI was induced by permanent left anterior descending coronary artery ligation as described previously11 using intraperitoneal injection of avertin 0.015 mg/kg and assisted ventilation (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, Mass).

In Vivo Tissue Homing Assay
Female C57BL/6J mice 9 to 10 weeks old underwent ovariectomy at day –28, followed by either 1.7 mg E2 pellet or placebo-containing pellet implantation, together with splenectomy at day –7. Seven days later (day 0), animals underwent MI surgery. Cultured EPCs were coincubated with 2 µg/mL DiI-acLDL (Biomedical Technologies, Stoughton, Mass) for 1 hour, and 5x105 EPCs were injected intravenously immediately after MI surgery. Hearts of these mice were harvested at the indicated time after MI surgery for histology.

Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting Analysis
To evaluate the number of circulating EPCs, 1 mL blood was taken at days –1, 7, and 28, and mononuclear cells were isolated by density centrifugation with Histopaque-1083 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Mo) for fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The viable mononuclear cell population (2 to 4x106 cells were available from 1 mL blood) was analyzed for the expression of Sca-1–FITC (BD PharMingen, San Diego, Calif) and Flk-1–PE (BD PharMingen). Isotype-identical antibodies served as negative controls (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, Pa).

Echocardiography
Left ventricular function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (SONOS 5500, Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, Calif) at days –1, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, left ventricular end-systolic dimension, and fractional shortening at the papillary muscle level of the left ventricle were measured, and the mean value of 3 measurements was determined for each sample.

Histological Analysis
In BMT models, hearts were harvested at day 28 for histological analysis. The explanted hearts were sliced in a bread-loaf fashion into transverse sections from apex to base and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Tissues were stained for Masson’s trichrome staining to measure the average ratio of fibrosis area to total left ventricular area.

Immunohistochemistry
The hearts of treated mice were harvested at predetermined times after surgery and frozen in optical coherence tomography compound (Sakura Finetek USA, Inc, Torrance, Calif). For capillary detection, sections were stained with mouse anti-CD31 antibody (BD PharMingen). For detection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), sections were incubated with mouse anti-VEGF antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc, Santa Cruz, Calif). Details are described in the Data Supplement.

Quantitative RT-PCR
RNA was collected from 8x105 cells per sample with RNA STAT-60 (TEL-TEST, Inc, Friendswood, Texas). Total RNA was reverse transcribed with iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif), and amplification was performed on the Taqman 7300 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif). Primer and probe sequences are described in the Data Supplement.

Determination of E2-Surface Binding With E2-Conjugated BSA-FITC
E2-ER binding study was performed as previously described27 with modification, as described in the Data Supplement.

Reporter Gene Luciferase Assay for Estrogen-Responsive Element–Dependent Transcription
EPCs were transiently transfected with estrogen-responsive element (ERE)–luciferase reporter construct using Fusene 6 transfection reagent (Roche, Palo Alto, Calif) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and luciferase activity was determined as described before.28

Statistical Analysis
All values are expressed as mean±SE. Statistical significance was evaluated through the use of an unpaired t test for comparisons between 2 groups. For comparison among 3 or 4 groups, 1-factor analysis of variance was used, followed by an unpaired t test to compare 2 groups within them. When multiple time-point measurements were taken, repeated-measures analysis was done, followed by an unpaired t test. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

The authors had full access to and take responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
E2 Effects on EPC Cell Function Are Abolished in ER-Knockout EPCs
First, we evaluated the role of ER expression on EPC cell function in vitro. In migration assays (Figure 1a), EPC migration was significantly increased in WT cells by physiological concentrations of E2 but was absent in ER{alpha}KO EPCs and reduced in ERßKO EPCs (WT EPCs: 8.89±0.17%/E2 0 mol/L, 14.1±1.50%/E2 10–9 mol/L, P<0.01 versus without E2; 14.8±0.81%/E2 10–8 mol/L, P<0.001 versus without E2; ERßKO EPCs: 10.6±0.20%/E2 0 mol/L, 13.4±1.74%/E2 10–8 mol/L, P<0.01 versus without E2). In proliferation assays (Figure 1b), E2-induced proliferation of in vitro expanded EPCs obtained from both ER{alpha}KO and ERßKO mice was significantly reduced compared with EPCs obtained from WT littermates (WT EPCs: 8540±420 cpm/E2 10–8 mol/L versus ER{alpha}KO EPCs: 4320±50 cpm/E2 10–8 mol/L, P<0.001; WT EPCs: 8540±420 cpm/E2 10–8 mol/L versus ERßKO EPCs: 4650±240 cpm/E2 10–8 mol/L, P<0.001). Similarly, adhesion activity to vitronectin, which is increased in a dose-dependent manner by E2 in WT EPCs, was absent in ER{alpha}KO EPCs and reduced in ERßKO EPCs (Figure 1c) (WT EPCs: 1.00±0.03/E2 0 mol/L, 1.27±0.04/E2 10–9 mol/L, P<0.05 versus without E2, 1.57±0.06/E2 10–8 mol/L, P<0.001 versus without E2; ER{alpha}KO EPCs: E2 0 mol/L, 1.00±0.19; E2 10–9 mol/L: 0.89±0.03 (P=NS versus 0 mol/L), E2 10–8 mol/L: 1.02±0.08 (P=NS versus 0 mol/L); ERßKO EPCs: 1.00±0.06/E2 0 mol/L, 1.23±0.04/E2 10–9 mol/L, P<0.001 versus without E2, 1.24±0.10/E2 10–8 mol/L, P<0.01 versus without E2). Finally, we evaluated tube formation, an established method to assess functional angiogenic activity in vitro. Capillary-like tube formation requires several biological activities such as endothelial cell proliferation, cell migration, protease secretion, and cell-to-cell interaction. As shown in Figure 1d and 1e, WT EPCs showed an E2 concentration–dependent response in capillary network formation (21.8±0.8 mm/E2 0 mol/L, 114±4.2 mm/E2 10–9 mol/L, P<0.001 versus without E2, 219±8.4 mm/E2 10–8 mol/L, P<0.001 versus without E2). Under similar culture condition, ERßKO EPCs (97.8±5.9 mm/E2 10–8 mol/L) made fewer networks compared with WT EPCs (P<0.001 versus WT EPCs), and tube formation by ER{alpha}KO EPCs (18.0±0.8 mm/E2 10–8 mol/L) was severely impaired (P<0.001 versus WT EPCs).


Figure 1179366
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. In vitro cell function in WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO EPCs. a, Migration toward E2 in EPCs from WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO mice. EPCs were allowed to migrate toward different molar concentrations of E2 as indicated. SDF-1 200 ng/mL is used as a positive control. n=4. b, Proliferation activity of EPCs from WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO mice under different E2 molar concentration is assessed by thymidine uptake assay. n=3. c, Adhesion activity to rat vitronectin-coated plates of EPCs from WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO mice under different E2 molar concentration. The number of adhered cells without E2 is considered 1.0; the number of adhered cells with different E2 molar concentrations is indicated as relative adhesion ratio. n=6. d, Tube formation assay in Matrigel matrix of EPCs from WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO mice under different E2 molar concentrations. e, Total tube length are measured and indicated. n=4. Similar results were obtained at least 3 times in these in vitro experiments. Bars represent mean±SE. V indicates VEGF 50 ng/mL. *P<0.001, +P<0.01, **P<0.05.

E2 Contribution to EPC Tissue Homing Is Impaired in ER-Knockout EPCs
From the results of the in vitro cell function assays, we hypothesized that E2 could modulate chemotactic activity in EPCs via both ERs. Accordingly, we evaluated EPC homing in vivo in a tissue homing assay using mouse acute MI models. Incorporation of DiI-labeled WT EPCs, injected just after MI induction, was observed in the border zone of the ischemic myocardium (Figure 2a) at day 3 (36.7±3.4 cells/x200 field). At day 5, the number of EPCs at the site increased (63.6±2.5 cells/x200 field) and persisted until at least day 10 (day 7, 65.7±4.0 cells; day 10, 61.5±4.0 cells; Figure 2b). Next, we compared WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO EPC incorporation at the border zone of the ischemic myocardium at day 7, choosing this time point as the approximate peak on the basis of pilot studies. Incorporation of WT EPCs in ovariectomized mice with placebo pellets was used as a negative control (40.2±3.7 cells). As shown in Figure 2c and 2d, the number of incorporated cells per x200 magnification field was significantly higher in WT EPCs (72.5±1.3) compared with ER{alpha}KO (42.4±1.5; P<0.001) and ERßKO EPCs (55.4±1.8; P=0.03).


Figure 2179366
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. In vivo EPC tissue homing assay. a, Histology at the border zone of ischemic myocardium on indicated days after MI surgery when WT EPCs were injected into an E2 pellet–implanted WT mouse. Injected EPCs are labeled with DiI-acLDL (red). Nuclear is stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar represents 100 µm. b, Number of DiI-positive cells at the border zone was counted and shown as mean±SE n=5. c, Histology at the border zone of ischemic myocardium at day 7 after MI surgery when WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO EPCs were injected into an E2 pellet–implanted WT mouse. Samples of WT EPC injection into WT mice with placebo pellets are used as negative controls. d, Quantification of injected, labeled EPCs in the MI border zone shown as mean±SE. n=5. WT E2+ indicates WT EPC injection into WT mouse with E2 pellet; WT E2–, WT EPC injection into WT mouse with placebo pellet; ER{alpha}KO E2+, ER{alpha}KO EPC injection into WT mouse with E2 pellet; ERßKO E2+, ERßKO EPC injection into WT mouse with E2 pellet. *P<0.001, +P=0.03 vs WT E2+, respectively.

E2 Contribution to EPC Mobilization From Bone Marrow Was Impaired From ER-Knockout Bone Marrow
To evaluate the effect of ER-mediated effects on circulating EPC kinetics in vivo, peripheral blood was collected at serial time points after MI in WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO BMT models and prepared for fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. The light-scatter pattern of mononuclear cells was similar in WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO cells (Figure 3a). As shown in Figure 3b, a significantly greater number of circulating Sca-1+/Flk-1+ cells were observed in WT BMT mice 1 week after MI (2.87±0.13% of total mononuclear cells) compared with ER{alpha}KO (2.03±0.18%; P=0.004 versus WT BMT with E2 pellet) and ERßKO (2.62±0.07%; P=0.02 versus WT BMT with E2 pellet) BMT mice.


Figure 3179366
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. EPC mobilization from bone marrow in response to MI in WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO BMT to WT mice. a, Forward scatter (FSC-H) and side scatter (SSC-H) plot for circulating blood mononuclear cells in steady-state WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO mice. Numbers show percent of data-collected cells per whole cells (circled area). b, Percentage of Sca-1+/Flk-1+ mononuclear cells in circulating blood before and 1 and 4 weeks after MI is indicated as mean±SE. WT E2+ indicates WT BMT to WT mouse with E2 pellet (n=12); WT E2–, WT BMT to WT mouse with placebo pellet (n=12); ER{alpha}KO E2+, ER{alpha}KO BMT to WT mouse with E2 pellet (n=8); ERßKO E2+, ERßKO BMT to WT mouse with E2 pellet (n=8). *P=0.004, +P=0.02.

Protective Effect of E2 in MI Is Reduced in ER-Knockout BMT Model
Physiological and histological assessments were then performed after MI in WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO BMT mice. WT mice with WT BMT plus placebo pellets were evaluated as negative controls. Left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions and systolic function were not significantly different between WT BMT and ER mutant BMT mice early after MI (Figure 4a). However, beginning 3 weeks after MI, echocardiography revealed better preservation of fractional shortening in the WT BMT mice compared with ER{alpha}KO BMT mice (WT BMT versus ER{alpha}KO BMT: P=0.02 at 3 weeks after MI, P=0.007 at 4 weeks after MI; Figure 4a, left).


Figure 4179366
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Cardiac phenotype in WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO BMT to WT mice with MI surgery. WT E2+ indicates WT BMT to WT mouse with E2 pellet (n=12); WT E2–, WT BMT to WT mouse with placebo pellet (n=12); ER{alpha}KO E2+, ER{alpha}KO BMT to WT mouse with E2 pellet (n=8); ERßKO E2+, ERßKO BMT to WT mouse with E2 pellet (n=8). a, Left, Fractional shortening before and after MI is shown as mean±SE. *P<0.001 among 4 groups; P=0.02, ER{alpha}KO vs WT+E2; P=NS, ERßKO vs WT+E2. +P=0.01 among 4 groups; P=0.007, ER{alpha}KO vs WT+E2; P=NS, ERßKO vs WT+E2. Right, Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension before and after MI is shown as mean±SE. *P=0.004 among 4 groups; P=NS, ER{alpha}KO vs WT+E2; P=NS, ERßKO vs WT+E2. +P=0.005 among 4 groups; P=NS, ER{alpha}KO vs WT+E2; P=NS, ERßKO vs WT+E2. b, Representative cross sections of left ventricle at the papillary muscle level 4 weeks after MI stained with Masson’s trichrome. Scale bar represents 2 mm. c, Percent of fibrosis area in cross sections of left ventricle at the papillary muscle level in each BMT mice 4 weeks after MI. Bars represent mean±SE. n=5. P<0.001 among 4 groups. *P=0.03, ER{alpha}KO vs WT+E2. +P=0.04, ERßKO vs WT-E2. e, Cross sections at the border zone of ischemic myocardium in each BMT mice 4 weeks after MI stained with CD31 are shown. Scale bar represents 100 µm. f, Capillary density at the border zone of ischemic myocardium in each BMT mice 4 weeks after MI. Bars represent mean±SE. n=4. P<0.001 among 4 groups. *P<0.001, ER{alpha}KO E2+ vs WT E2+.

Masson’s trichrome–stained tissues in ER{alpha}KO and ERßKO BMT mice indicated marked dilation of the left ventricular cavity consistent with the echocardiographic measurements (Figure 4b). The area of fibrosis was significantly less in WT BMT mice than in ER{alpha}KO and ERßKO BMT mice (WT BMT, 13.5±1.1%; ER{alpha}KO BMT, 19.4±2.4%; ERßKO BMT, 17.9±1.1%; Figure 4c). WT BMT mice with placebo pellets were analyzed as negative controls (WT BMT with placebo, 21.7±0.8%). Capillary density at the border zone of ischemic myocardium 4 weeks after MI was significantly greater in WT BMT mice with E2 compared with ER{alpha}KO BMT and ERßKO BMT mice with E2 (WT BMT, 1718±75/mm2; ER{alpha}KO BMT, 1107±48/mm2; ERßKO BMT, 1567±50/mm2; Figure 4d and 4e). In WT BMT mice with placebo pellets, capillary density was 1136±83/mm2.

ER{alpha}/ERß Expression and Binding Activity to E2 on Mouse EPCs
In the above series of experiments, ER{alpha}KO EPCs appeared to have a more prominent phenotype than ERßKO EPCs. To better understand the potential mechanisms for this, we first evaluated ER{alpha} and ERß mRNA expression in WT mouse EPCs by RT-PCR. Both receptors were expressed on EPCs from WT mice cultured for 7 days (Figure 5a). Next, we used quantitative RT-PCR to evaluate the relative expression of individual receptors in EPCs and showed that ER{alpha} mRNA was expressed more abundantly on WT EPCs compared with ERß mRNA (relative expression versus 18S: ER{alpha}, 1.88±0.18, ERß, 0.01±0.01; Figure 5b and 5c; note that the y-axis scale is 10x between Figure 5b and Figure 5c). Because ERß expression was low by RT-PCR, we reevaluated it using other primer sets that were within exon 5 of the ERß sequence (Figure 5c, right). In WT EPCs, the relative expression of ERß versus 18S was again much lower than ER{alpha} expression (0.12±0.03). In ERßKO mice, ERß exon 5 gene transcription was accelerated (13.2±0.27), which indicates that the gene was actually present in ERßKO mice except exon 3, where the ERß gene was disrupted. In addition, E2 10–8 mol/L induces ER{alpha} mRNA upregulation in WT EPCs (P=0.004) and ERßKO EPCs (P=0.015; Figure 5d).


Figure 5179366
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. ER expression on mouse EPCs. a, ER{alpha} and ERß expression by RT-PCR in WT EPCs cultured for 4 and 7 days. b, ER{alpha} expression on EPCs from WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO mice by quantitative RT-PCR. Uterus tissues of WT mice are used as positive control (ER{alpha} relative expression vs 18S is 116; lane 4). n=4. c, ERß expression on EPCs from WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO mice using primers within exon 3 or 5 by quantitative RT-PCR. Spleen tissues of WT mice are used as positive controls. n=4. Exon 5 ERß-relative expression vs 18S is 13.2 in ERßKO EPCs (lane 7) and 48.0 in ERßKO spleen (lane 8). D, ER{alpha} expression on EPCs from WT and ERßKO mice is upregulated with 10–8 mol/L E2 treatment. n=3. *P=0.004, **P=0.015. e, Representative images of E2-surface binding with E2-conjugated BSA-FITC. WT+E2 10–6 mol/L. EPCs were pretreated with non–FITC-conjugated E2 10–6 mol/L for 15 minutes. f, Percentage of FITC-positive cells is shown. n=5. *P<0.001, ER{alpha}KO vs WT EPCs. g, ERE-dependent transcription of reporter gene luciferase is shown in EPCs from each genotype. n=3. **P<0.01, ER{alpha}KO vs WT EPCs with E2. *P<0.03, ERßKO vs WT EPCs with E2. Similar results were obtained at least 3 times in these in vitro experiments. Bars represent mean±SE.

Bovine serum albumin–FITC–tagged estradiol (E2coBSA-FITC) was used to investigate estrogen binding in WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO EPCs (Figure 5e and 5f). After 4 hours of incubation, 64.5±4.1% of cells were positive for FITC in WT EPCs, whereas 11.4±2.9% of cells were positive in ER{alpha}KO EPCs (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in binding activity between WT and ERßKO EPCs (58.8±3.0%). Preincubation with unlabeled E2 10–6 mol/L diminished E2coBSA binding (20.8±2.5%), indicating ligand specificity. As an additional measure of individual ER function, ERE-dependent transcription of the reporter gene luciferase was evaluated in EPCs from each genotype. As shown in Figure 5g, E2 treatment (10–8 mol/L) of WT EPCs led to a 35-fold increase in reporter activity over untreated cells. In contrast to WT EPCs, reporter activity was significantly decreased in EPCs from both ER{alpha}KO and ERßKO mice (P<0.01 and P<0.03, respectively), indicating that E2-induced, ERE-dependent gene transcription requires both ER{alpha} and ERß.

E2 Upregulates VEGF Through ER{alpha} in EPCs
To investigate ER{alpha}-associated gene expression, we evaluated the repertoire of angiogenic molecules expressed in EPCs by analyzing RNA extracted from WT and ER{alpha}KO EPCs. Of the several angiogenic molecules differentially expressed in WT and ER{alpha}KO EPCs, VEGF-A was the most consistent gene expressed differentially, which was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR (Figure 6a). When WT EPCs were treated with 10–8 mol/L E2, the abundance of VEGF transcripts increased 5-fold within 1 hour of E2 exposure to WT EPCs (Figure 6b) and persisted for 8 hours (relative expression versus 18S: 26.2±2.4/0 h, 123±12/1 h, 128±21/3 h, 114±14/5 h, and 84±10/8 h), returning to basal levels at 24 hours of E2 treatment (39.2±1.9/12 h and 28.4±2.0/24 h). In contrast, in ER{alpha}KO EPCs, E2 exposure resulted in a brief, modest increase in VEGF mRNA (relative expression versus 18S: 10.6±0.4/0 h, 24.0±0.2/1 h, 11.9±0.8/3 h, 9.4±0.9/5 h, and 11.0±0.3/8 h). In the mouse MI model, after intravenous injection of EPCs just after induction of myocardial injury, we observed that the incorporated WT EPCs, but not ER{alpha}KO EPCs, expressed VEGF (Figure 6c), corroborating the in vitro findings and providing further evidence that ER{alpha}-mediated VEGF expression might represent a key feature of the E2-mediated EPC-derived effect on MI recovery.


Figure 6179366
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. E2 upregulates VEGF through ER{alpha} in EPCs. a, VEGF expression on EPCs from WT, ER{alpha}KO, and ERßKO mice cultured in normal endothelial cell medium (EBM-2). Relative VEGF expression vs 18S is indicated. n=3. Bars represent mean±SE. *P<0.001, ER{alpha}KO vs WT EPCs. b, VEGF expression on EPCs from WT and ER{alpha}KO mice with 10–8 mol/L E2 treatment at indicated times. EPCs are cultured in E2-free medium for 48 hours and starved for 12 hours before the experiment. Relative VEGF expression vs 18S is indicated. n=3. Bars represent mean±SE. *P<0.001. Similar results were obtained at least 3 times in these in vitro experiments. c, VEGF is expressed on injected WT EPCs, not on ER{alpha}KO, at the border zone of ischemic myocardium 7 days after MI. Just after MI surgery, 5x105 EPCs labeled with DiI-acLDL (red) are injected. Scale bar represents 100 µm.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Previous studies performed in our laboratory indicated that E2 could enhance the recruitment of EPCs and had favorable effects on neovascularization in ischemic tissues.11 The focus of the present study was the role of ERs in activation of EPCs during ischemic neovascularization.

These data, from in vitro EPC functional assays, assessment of in vivo EPC homing to ischemic myocardium, and EPC mobilization from bone marrow after MI in mice in which the bone marrow had been replaced with ER{alpha}KO or ERßKO mutant marrow, indicate that both ER{alpha} and ERß are functional in EPC-mediated ischemic neovascularization.

The present findings further reveal that the effects of E2 on EPC activation are mediated more prominently via ER{alpha} than ERß. Prior studies of the roles of ER{alpha} and ERß in mediating the macrovascular protective effects of estrogen acting via endothelial cells.8,29–31 including studies in transgenic mice in which either ER{alpha} or ERß expression had been disrupted, have revealed that ER{alpha}, not ERß, mediates the protective effects of estrogen after vascular injury.30,31 Our data indicate that certain microvascular effects of E2 involving bone marrow–derived EPCs are mediated predominantly via ER{alpha}, but the data also provide evidence of a clear function for ERß in this setting.

Our data also provide several clues to explain the apparently disproportionate role of ER{alpha} in EPC-mediated ischemic neovascularization. First, we found that ER{alpha} mRNA expression was >10 times higher than ERß. In agreement with previous evidence in mature endothelial cells,32 physiological levels of E2 induce ER{alpha} mRNA upregulation in EPCs, indicating that the ligand has potent effects on the expression of its own receptor. Moreover, FITC-conjugated E2-ER binding assay and reporter gene luciferase assay for ERE-dependent transcription support that ER{alpha} is a main functional receptor for E2 in EPCs.

Further potential mechanisms of the ER{alpha}-specific effects on EPCs were provided by gene expression profiling, which indicated that VEGF was markedly upregulated by E2 in WT but not ER{alpha}KO EPCs. The in vitro findings in isolated EPCs were corroborated in vivo, showing VEGF expression in incorporated WT EPCs in the mouse MI model compared with minimal expression by ER{alpha}KO EPCs. Previous studies have shown that estrogens increase VEGF expression in uterine tissue,33,34 endometrial cells,35,36 endometrial adenocarcinomas,37,38 breast cancer cells,39,40 and vascular smooth muscle cells.41 In cancer cells, E2 was shown to increase VEGF transcriptional activity through both ER{alpha} and ERß in VEGF promoter luciferase assays42,43 via E2-ER complexes binding variant ERE in the promoter region of VEGF gene.42,44 Our data indicate that this mechanism is not at play in EPCs.

The actual mechanism by which E2 influences EPC kinetics through ERß remains unknown. Among 128 angiogenic genes investigated by gene array analysis, we could not find any candidates with consistent and specific expression differences between WT and ERßKO EPCs. A more comprehensive search to identify previously unsuspected candidate genes is under way.

The findings of this report could be of interest for a variety of scientific reasons; however, the impact of our data resides to a large degree on the significant overall effect of estradiol on post-MI outcome. In the present investigation, we concentrated our studies on the mobilization, recruitment, and incorporation of bone marrow–derived cells into vascular structures; however, this paradigm alone may not offer the full explanation for the effect of E2. For example, we did not investigate the possibility that E2 augmented other pathways of tissue repair such as mobilization and homing of cells that can differentiate into cardiomyocytes45–47 and stimulation of local cardiac progenitors.48 In the setting of acute myocardial injury, improved outcome may result via protection (eg, antiapoptosis) and via the full paradigm of tissue repair (ie, replacement of damaged structures). Tissue repair thus requires neovascularization, as documented in the present investigation; however, our studies do not exclude additional E2-mediated effects. Cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts are known to express ER,49,50 providing a mechanism for direct effects of E2 on these components of the tissue response to MI.

Finally, beyond the specific findings of this report, these data have important implications because they provide additional evidence of the critical importance of the phenotype of bone marrow–derived EPCs in regulating ischemic tissue repair and suggest that modulation of EPC phenotype may have important therapeutic implications.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Mickey Neely for secretarial assistance.

Sources of Funding

This study was supported in part by NIH grants (HL-53354, HL-57516, HL-63414, HL-77428, HL-80137, HL-P01-66957).

Disclosures

Dr Losordo has significant relationships as a principal investigator, collaborator, or consultant on research grants with the following companies: Baxter, Inc, Corautus, Cordis, Curis, Anormed, and Boston Scientific Corp. The other authors report no conflicts.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Johns A, Freay AD, Fraser W, Korach KS, Rubanyi GM. Disruption of estrogen receptor gene prevents 17 beta estradiol–induced angiogenesis in transgenic mice. Endocrinology. 1996; 137: 4511–4513.[Abstract]
  2. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis: correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324: 1–8.[Abstract]
  3. Fox SB, Gatter KC, Bicknell R, Going JJ, Stanton P, Cooke TG, Harris AL. Relationship of endothelial cell proliferation to tumor vascularity in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1993; 53: 4161–4163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Vartanian RK, Weidner N. Correlation of intratumoral endothelial cell proliferation with microvessel density (tumor angiogenesis) and tumor cell proliferation in breast carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 1994; 144: 1188–1194.[Abstract]
  5. Fotsis T, Zhang Y, Pepper MS, Adlercreutz H, Montesano R, Nawroth PP, Schweigerer L. The endogenous oestrogen metabolite 2-methoxyoestradiol inhibits angiogenesis and suppresses tumour growth. Nature. 1994; 368: 237–239.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Venkov CD, Rankin AB, Vaughan DE. Identification of authentic estrogen receptor in cultured endothelial cells: a potential mechanism for steroid hormone regulation of endothelial function. Circulation. 1996; 94: 727–733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kim-Schulze S, McGowan KA, Hubchak SC, Cid MC, Martin MB, Kleinman HK, Greene GL, Schnaper HW. Expression of an estrogen receptor by human coronary artery and umbilical vein endothelial cells. Circulation. 1996; 94: 1402–1407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Iafrati MD, Karas RH, Aronovitz M, Kim S, Sullivan TR Jr, Lubahn DB, O’Donnell TF Jr, Korach KS, Mendelsohn ME. Estrogen inhibits the vascular injury response in estrogen receptor alpha–deficient mice. Nat Med. 1997; 3: 545–548.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Morales DE, McGowan KA, Grant DS, Maheshwari S, Bhartiya D, Cid MC, Kleinman HK, Schnaper HW. Estrogen promotes angiogenic activity in human umbilical vein endothelial cells in vitro and in a murine model. Circulation. 1995; 91: 755–763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kyriakides ZS, Petinakis P, Kaklamanis L, Sbarouni E, Karayannakos P, Iliopoulos D, Dontas I, Kremastinos DT. Intramuscular administration of estrogen may promote angiogenesis and perfusion in a rabbit model of chronic limb ischemia. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 49: 626–633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Iwakura A, Shastry S, Luedemann C, Hamada H, Kawamoto A, Kishore R, Zhu Y, Qin G, Silver M, Thorne T, Eaton L, Masuda H, Asahara T, Losordo DW. Estradiol enhances recovery after myocardial infarction by augmenting incorporation of bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells into sites of ischemia-induced neovascularization via endothelial nitric oxide synthase–mediated activation of matrix metalloproteinase-9. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1605–1614.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Shlipak MG, Angeja BG, Go AS, Frederick PD, Canto JG, Grady D. Hormone therapy and in-hospital survival after myocardial infarction in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2300–2304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997; 275: 964–967.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Shi Q, Rafii S, Wu MH, Wijelath ES, Yu C, Ishida A, Fujita Y, Kothari S, Mohle R, Sauvage LR, Moore MA, Storb RF, Hammond WP. Evidence for circulating bone marrow–derived endothelial cells. Blood. 1998; 92: 362–367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, Chen D, Silver M, Kearney M, Magner M, Isner JM, Asahara T. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 434–438.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka C, Pastore C, Silver M, Kearne M, Magner M, Isner JM. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ Res. 1999; 85: 221–228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Heissig B, Hattori K, Dias S, Friedrich M, Ferris B, Hackett NR, Crystal RG, Besmer P, Lyden D, Moore MA, Werb Z, Rafii S. Recruitment of stem and progenitor cells from the bone marrow niche requires MMP-9 mediated release of kit-ligand. Cell. 2002; 109: 625–637.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Ceradini DJ, Kulkarni AR, Callaghan MJ, Tepper OM, Bastidas N, Kleinman ME, Capla JM, Galiano RD, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1. Nat Med. 2004; 10: 858–864.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Strehlow K, Werner N, Berweiler J, Link A, Dirnagl U, Priller J, Laufs K, Ghaeni L, Milosevic M, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Estrogen increases bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cell production and diminishes neointima formation. Circulation. 2003; 107: 3059–3065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Iwakura A, Luedemann C, Shastry S, Hanley A, Kearney M, Aikawa R, Isner JM, Asahara T, Losordo DW. Estrogen-mediated, endothelial nitric oxide synthase–dependent mobilization of bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells contributes to reendothelialization after arterial injury. Circulation. 2003; 108: 3115–3121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Asahara T, Takahashi T, Masuda H, Kalka C, Chen D, Iwaguro H, Inai Y, Silver M, Isner JM. VEGF contributes to postnatal neovascularization by mobilizing bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 3964–3972.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Ii M, Nishimura H, Iwakura A, Wecker A, Eaton E, Asahara T, Losordo DW. Endothelial progenitor cells are rapidly recruited to myocardium and mediate protective effect of ischemic preconditioning via "imported" nitric oxide synthase activity. Circulation. 2005; 111: 1114–1120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Murasawa S, Llevadot J, Silver M, Isner JM, Losordo DW, Asahara T. Constitutive human telomerase reverse transcriptase expression enhances regenerative properties of endothelial progenitor cells. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1133–1139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. McKallip R, Li R, Ladisch S. Tumor gangliosides inhibit the tumor-specific immune response. J Immunol. 1999; 163: 3718–3726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Cid MC, Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Esteban MJ, Cebrian M, Gho YS, Font C, Urbano-Marquez A, Grau JM, Kleinman HK. Tissue and serum angiogenic activity is associated with low prevalence of ischemic complications in patients with giant-cell arteritis. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1664–1671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Dupont S, Krust A, Gansmuller A, Dierich A, Chambon P, Mark M. Effect of single and compound knockouts of estrogen receptors alpha (ERalpha) and beta (ERbeta) on mouse reproductive phenotypes. Development. 2000; 127: 4277–4291.[Abstract]
  27. Figtree GA, McDonald D, Watkins H, Channon KM. Truncated estrogen receptor alpha 46-kDa isoform in human endothelial cells: relationship to acute activation of nitric oxide synthase. Circulation. 2003; 107: 120–126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kishore R, Spyridopoulos I, Luedemann C, Losordo DW. Functionally novel tumor necrosis factor-alpha–modulated CHR-binding protein mediates cyclin A transcriptional repression in vascular endothelial cells. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 307–314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Karas RH, Hodgin JB, Kwoun M, Krege JH, Aronovitz M, Mackey W, Gustafsson JA, Korach KS, Smithies O, Mendelsohn ME. Estrogen inhibits the vascular injury response in estrogen receptor beta–deficient female mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 15133–15136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Pare G, Krust A, Karas RH, Dupont S, Aronovitz M, Chambon P, Mendelsohn ME. Estrogen receptor-alpha mediates the protective effects of estrogen against vascular injury. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 1087–1092.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Brouchet L, Krust A, Dupont S, Chambon P, Bayard F, Arnal JF. Estradiol accelerates reendothelialization in mouse carotid artery through estrogen receptor-alpha but not estrogen receptor-beta. Circulation. 2001; 103: 423–428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Ihionkhan CE, Chambliss KL, Gibson LL, Hahner LD, Mendelsohn ME, Shaul PW. Estrogen causes dynamic alterations in endothelial estrogen receptor expression. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 814–820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Cullinan-Bove K, Koos RD. Vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor expression in the rat uterus: rapid stimulation by estrogen correlates with estrogen-induced increases in uterine capillary permeability and growth. Endocrinology. 1993; 133: 829–837.[Abstract]
  34. Shweiki D, Itin A, Neufeld G, Gitay-Goren H, Keshet E. Patterns of expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptors in mice suggest a role in hormonally regulated angiogenesis. J Clin Invest. 1993; 91: 2235–2243.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Shifren JL, Tseng JF, Zaloudek CJ, Ryan IP, Meng YG, Ferrara N, Jaffe RB, Taylor RN. Ovarian steroid regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in the human endometrium: implications for angiogenesis during the menstrual cycle and in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996; 81: 3112–3118.[Abstract]
  36. Bausero P, Cavaille F, Meduri G, Freitas S, Perrot-Applanat M. Paracrine action of vascular endothelial growth factor in the human endometrium: production and target sites, and hormonal regulation. Angiogenesis. 1998; 2: 167–182.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Charnock-Jones DS, Sharkey AM, Rajput-Williams J, Burch D, Schofield JP, Fountain SA, Boocock CA, Smith SK. Identification and localization of alternately spliced mRNAs for vascular endothelial growth factor in human uterus and estrogen regulation in endometrial carcinoma cell lines. Biol Reprod. 1993; 48: 1120–1128.[Abstract]
  38. Fujimoto J, Sakaguchi H, Hirose R, Ichigo S, Tamaya T. Progestins suppress estrogen-induced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) subtypes in uterine endometrial cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 1999; 141: 63–71.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Nakamura J, Savinov A, Lu Q, Brodie A Estrogen regulates vascular endothelial growth/permeability factor expression in 7,12-dimethylbenz (a) anthracene-induced rat mammary tumors. Endocrinology. 1996; 137: 5589–5596.[Abstract]
  40. Ruohola JK, Valve EM, Karkkainen MJ, Joukov V, Alitalo K, Harkonen PL. Vascular endothelial growth factors are differentially regulated by steroid hormones and antiestrogens in breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1999; 149: 29–40.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Bausero P, Ben-Mahdi M, Mazucatelli J, Bloy C, Perrot-Applanat M. Vascular endothelial growth factor is modulated in vascular muscle cells by estradiol, tamoxifen, and hypoxia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000; 279: H2033–2042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Mueller MD, Vigne JL, Minchenko A, Lebovic DI, Leitman DC, Taylor RN. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene transcription by estrogen receptors alpha and beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 10972–10977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Buteau-Lozano H, Ancelin M, Lardeux B, Milanini J, Perrot-Applanat M. Transcriptional regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by estradiol and tamoxifen in breast cancer cells: a complex interplay between estrogen receptors alpha and beta. Cancer Res. 2002; 62: 4977–4984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Hyder SM, Nawaz Z, Chiappetta C, Stancel GM. Identification of functional estrogen response elements in the gene coding for the potent angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor. Cancer Res. 2000; 60: 3183–3190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Jakoniuk I, Anderson SM, Li B, Pickel J, Mckay R, Nadal-Ginard B, Bodine DM, Leri A, Aniversa P. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature. 2001; 401: 701–705.
  46. Koyanagi M, Urbich C, Chavakis E, Hoffmann J, Rupp S, Badorff C, Zeiher AM, Starzinski-Powitz A, Haendeler J, Dimmeler S. Differentiation of circulating endothelial progenitor cells to a cardiomyogenic phenotype depends on E-cadherin. FEBS Lett. 2005; 579: 6060–6066.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Iwasaki H, Kawamoto A, Ishikawa M, Oyamada A, Nakamori S, Nishimura H, Sadamoto K, Horii M, Matsumoto T, Murasawa S, Shibata T, Suehiro S, Asahara T. Dose-dependent contribution of CD34-positive cell transplantation to concurrent vasculogenesis and cardiomyogenesis for functional regenerative recovery after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1311–1325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Beltrami AP, Barlucchi L, Torella D, Baker M, Limana F, Chimenti S, Kasahara H, Rota M, Musso E, Urbanek K, Leri A, Kajstura J, Nadal-Ginard B, Anversa P. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. 2003; 114: 763–776.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Grohe C, Kahlert S, Lobbert K, Stimpel M, Karas RH, Vetter H, Neyses L. Cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts contain functional estrogen receptors. FEBS Lett. 1997; 416: 107–112.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Grohe C, Kahlert S, Lobbert K, Vetter H. Expression of oestrogen receptor alpha and beta in rat heart: role of local oestrogen synthesis. J Endocrinol. 1998; 156: R1–R7.[Abstract]

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Despite the negative results of recent randomized trials of hormone replacement therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular events, abundant clinical and preclinical data provide evidence of a protective effect of estrogen. For example, premenopausal women are significantly less likely to experience cardiovascular events than are age-matched men, and premature (eg, surgical) menopause is associated with an increased incidence of coronary disease. Most recently, mutations in certain estrogen receptors in humans have been associated with increased incidence of cardiac disease. The present study examined the role of estrogen receptors (ERs) {alpha} and ß in the improved recovery from myocardial infarction resulting from estradiol (E2) administration. The data reveal that although both ER{alpha} and ERß mediate the effects of E2 on myocardial infarction recovery, ER{alpha} appears to be more critical. These data may lead to the identification of new therapeutic targets for post–myocardial infarction recovery by dissecting the effects of ER{alpha} and ERß. With the knowledge that ER{alpha} is more important in the overall benefit of E2, specific downstream signaling pathways that directly mediate the benefit of E2 may be targeted pharmacologically, thereby permitting development of a therapy that mimics the benefits of E2 without the side effects (thrombosis, gynecomastia in men, etc) of the natural or synthetic hormone.


*    Footnotes
 
The online-only Data Supplement is available with this article at http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.631465/DC1.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
E. Zhan, T. Keimig, J. Xu, E. Peterson, J. Ding, F. Wang, and X.-P. Yang
Dose-dependent cardiac effect of oestrogen replacement in mice post-myocardial infarction
Exp Physiol, August 1, 2008; 93(8): 982 - 993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
I. C Villar, A. J Hobbs, and A. Ahluwalia
Sex differences in vascular function: implication of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor
J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 197(3): 447 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]