doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.000729
(Circulation. 2006;114:I-529 – I-534.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease |
Mechanism of Recurrent/Persistent Ischemic/Functional Mitral Regurgitation in the Chronic Phase After Surgical Annuloplasty
Importance of Augmented Posterior Leaflet Tethering
From Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (E.K., Y.O., F.Z., K.K., K.N., T.Y., B.Y., T. Uemura, K.T., M.M., S.H., A.K., C.T.), Department of Clinical Laboratory (N.M.), Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (Y.I, T. Ueno, R.S.), Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan; Massachusetts General Hospital (R.A.L.), Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Yutaka Otsuji, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima City, 890-8520, Japan. E-mail yutaka{at}m.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background— Surgical annuloplasty can potentially hoist the posterior annulus anteriorly, exaggerate posterior leaflet (PML) tethering, and lead to recurrent ischemic/functional mitral regurgitation (MR). Characteristics of leaflet configurations in late postoperative MR were investigated.
Methods and Results— In 30 patients with surgical annuloplasty for ischemic MR and 20 controls, the anterior leaflet (AML) and PML tethering angles relative to the line connecting annuli, posterior and apical displacement of the coaptation and the MR grade were measured by echocardiography before, early after, and late after surgery. Early after surgery, grade of MR and AML tethering generally decreased (P<0.01), whereas PML tethering significantly worsened (P<0.01). Nine of the 30 patients showed recurrent/persistent MR late after surgery. Compared with patients without late MR, those with the MR showed similar reduction in the annular area, significant re-increase in posterior displacement of the coaptation, and progressive worsening in PML tethering (P<0.05) late after surgery in comparison to the early phase. Both preoperative MR and late postoperative MR were significantly correlated with all tethering variables in univariate analysis. Although apical displacement of the coaptation was the primary determinant of preoperative MR (r2=0.60, P<0.0001), increased PML tethering was the primary determinant of late MR (r2=0.75, P<0.0001).
Conclusions— Whereas both leaflets tethering is related to preoperative ischemic MR, both leaflets tethering but with predominant contribution from augmented and progressive PML tethering is related to recurrent/persistent ischemic/functional MR late after surgical annuloplasty.
Key Words: coronary disease • mitral valve • valvuloplasty
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Although surgical annuloplasty for ischemic/functional mitral regurgitation (MR) is effective,1–3 a considerable number of patients show recurrent/persistent MR,3–6 which adversely affects mortality7 without established mechanism.
Mitral leaflet tethering by the outward displacement of papillary muscles (PM) caused by left ventricular (LV) remodeling is the basic mechanism of ischemic MR.8–14 Surgical annuloplasty, which may hoist the posterior annulus anteriorly without displacing the anterior annulus fixed at the aortic root, can potentially and specifically augment posterior leaflet (PML) tethering by increasing the distance between the PM tip and posterior annulus without affecting anterior leaflet (AML) tethering (Figure 1).15 We hypothesized that ischemic MR before surgical annuloplasty is related to both leaflets tethering, and that the MR afterward is also related to both leaflets tethering but with PML predominance. This hypothesis has been tested for persistent ischemic MR early after surgery.16 However, this has not been tested for recurrent/persistent MR in the chronic phase after surgery. Therefore, the purpose was to investigate leaflet configurations in patients with ischemic/functional MR before and late after surgical annuloplasty, and to clarify the characteristics of leaflet configurations responsible for recurrent/persistent ischemic MR.
|
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Subjects
Subjects consisted of 51 consecutive patients who underwent surgical annuloplasty for ischemic/functional MR in our hospital and 20 normal controls. Four patients with later cardiac death, 3 with concomitant chordal cutting, 1 with subsequent mitral valve replacement, 1 with ring detachment, 10 without echocardiographic evaluation in the chronic phase after the surgery, and 2 with suboptimal images were excluded. The remaining 30 patients with surgical annuloplasty and serial echocardiography up to the chronic phase comprised the study subjects. Patients’ profiles are summarized in Table 1. Ischemic/functional MR was diagnosed by echocardiography with the following criteria: (1) the presence of LV dilatation and/or dysfunction; (2) the presence of apical displacement of mitral leaflets,8 and (3) the absence of organic leaflet lesions. Normal subjects had no known cardiovascular disease and normal echocardiogram. In addition to Carpentier Edwards rigid ring, posterior annuloplasty with a flexible linear reducer (stainless steel wire seemed with a polyester sheath) was performed. Coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 27 and LV plasty with Dor’s, anterior wall overlapping,17 posterior aneurysm plication, or papillary muscle approximation was performed in 11 patients. Patients were managed with standard medications after surgery and no patient had a subsequent ischemic event. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
|
Echocardiography
Echocardiographic examinations were performed using commercially available scanners (ATL HDI 3000, Bothell, Wash; Toshiba SSH 380A, Tokyo, Japan; Philips Medical Systems Sonos 5500, Andover, Mass; Aloka SSD-5500, Tokyo, Japan; Siemens Sequoia 512, Mountain View, Calif) 1 week before, 2 to 8 weeks after, and 10 to 45 months after the surgery.
By biplane Simpson’s method, LV end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume (ESV), and ejection fractions (EF) were obtained. LV short-to-long axis dimension ratio in the end-systolic apical 4-chamber view was defined as the LV sphericity. Mid-systolic mitral annular dimension in the apical 4-chamber and 2-chamber views was measured to calculate its area.18
Mitral Leaflet Configuration
Mitral leaflet configuration was quantified in the mid-systolic parasternal long-axis view (Figure 2). AML and PML tethering was measured as the angles 
1 and 2, respectively. AML tethering from secondary chordae was measured as the bending angle ß between tangent lines of proximal and distal AML.19 Posterior and apical displacement of the coaptation was measured as distances d1 and d2, respectively.
|
Quantification of MR
In the parasternal or apical long-axis view, MR was quantified by the narrowest jet origin or the vena contracta (VC) width.6 VC width >3 mm was considered significant.
Statistical Analysis
Results were expressed as mean±SD. Comparisons of continuous variables among >3 groups were performed by Kruskal-Wallis test. When this test was significant, Scheffé test was conducted for multiple comparisons. Wilcoxon test was used to compare preoperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative variables. Determinants of MR degree were explored by multiple stepwise regression analysis. A P<0.05 was considered significant. Echocardiographic measurements were averaged over 3 cardiac cycles. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability for measurement of d1, d2, 1, and 2 were 6.4 or 5.6%, 7.7 or 6.7%, 7.5 or 7.0%, and 6.7 or 6.1% of the mean value, respectively. The authors had full access to the data and take full responsibility for their integrity. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Incidence of Early and Late Postoperative Ischemic MR
Early after the surgery, severity of MR significantly decreased (VC width, 3.7±1.6 versus 0.2±0.8 mm; P<0.001) and 2 patients had persistent MR. Late after the surgery, the MR significantly re-increased (0.2±0.8 to 1.3±2.0 mm; P<0.01), resulting with 2 patients with early postoperative MR and significant MR, and an additional 7 in whom recurrent MR developed. These 9 patients comprised the group with late postoperative MR and the remaining 21 comprised the group without it (Table 1).
Changes in LV Volume, Mitral Leaflet Configuration, and MR in Patients Without and With Late Postoperative MR (Table 2)
|
Severity of MR significantly decreased early after surgery in both groups (P<0.01). Although patients without late MR did not show re-increase in the MR late after surgery, those with it had significant re-increase (P<0.01). The LVESV significantly decreased in both groups early after the surgery (P<0.05). Whereas patients without late MR had further reduction in LVESV late after surgery (P<0.05), those with the MR had re-increase but without statistical significance. LVEF significantly improved early after surgery only in patients without late MR (P<0.05). LVEF kept constant afterward in both groups. The mitral annulus area significantly decreased early after surgery (P<0.05) and kept constant afterward in both groups.
D1 significantly decreased early after surgery in both groups (P<0.05). Whereas D1 kept constant afterward in patients without late MR, it significantly re-increased in those with the MR (P<0.05). D2 significantly decreased early after surgery (P<0.01) and kept constant afterward in both groups. The 1 significantly decreased early after surgery in both groups (P<0.05). Although it kept constant afterward in patients without late MR, it re-increased in those with the MR but without statistical significance. The 2 significantly increased early after surgery in both groups (P<0.01). Patients without late MR did not show progressive increase in 2 afterward, but those with it showed significant progression (P<0.05). The ß significantly increased early after surgery only in patients without late MR. Whereas it kept constant afterward in patients without late MR, it significantly decreased in those with the MR (P<0.05).
Preoperatively, increase in 1 compared with mean normal value was comparable with that in 2 in both groups (no late MR, plus 22±6 versus 24±9 degree, not significant; late MR, plus 22±3 versus 24±7 degree, not significant). Therefore, preoperative tethering was similar between AML and PML. However, early after surgery, increase in 1 compared with mean normal value was significantly smaller than that in 2 in both groups (no late MR, plus 16±3 versus 56±5 degree, P<0.01; late MR, plus 17±6 versus 57±15 degree, P<0.01). Therefore, early postoperative leaflet tethering was asymmetric with PML predominance, which showed significant progression only in patients with late MR (57±15 to 81±10 degree, P<0.01).
Determinants of Preoperative and Late Postoperative MR (Table 3)
|
Multiple regression analysis identified primary independent contribution from increased d2 for the preoperative VC width along with increased 1 and d1, suggesting that combination of both leaflets tethering was the main determinant of preoperative MR.
Multiple regression analysis identified primary contribution from increased 2 for the late postoperative VC width along with decreased ß and increased d1, suggesting that combination of both leaflets tethering but with predominant contribution from augmented PML tethering was the main determinant of the late MR (Figure 3).
|
Figure 4 demonstrates representative patients. Compared with the normal subject in the left upper panel, the patient with ischemic MR without annuloplasty in the right upper panel has similarly increased AML and PML tethering. The patient without late postoperative MR in the middle panels had predominant PML tethering. The patient in the lower panels with late MR had more advanced PML tethering and LV remodeling.
|
Change in LV Volume and Leaflet Tethering Late After Surgery
Reduction in LVESV late after surgery relative to preoperative phase was significantly correlated with less leaflet tethering (
MR jet width: r2=0.57, P<0.0001; 1: r2=0.18, P<0.05; 2: r2=0.46, P<0.0001; d1/body surface area [BSA]: r2=0.29, P<0.005; d2/BSA: r2=0.15, P<0.05; ß: r2=0.24, P<0.01). Progressive increase in LVESV from early to late postoperative phase was significantly correlated with progressive leaflet tethering (MR jet width: r2=0.47, P<0.0001; 1: r2=0.16, P<0.05; 2: r2=0.50, P<0.0001; d1/BSA: r2=0.38, P<0.005; d2/BSA: r2=0.08, n.s.; ß: r2=0.34, P=0.001).
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Different Leaflet Configurations in Preoperative and Postoperative Ischemic/Functional MR
This study has demonstrated that ischemic MR without surgical ring annuloplasty is associated with approximately symmetrical AML and PML tethering. Early after the surgery, only PML tethering significantly increased in both patients without and with late MR. The PML tethering showed progressive worsening late after surgery in patients with late MR. Therefore, AML and PML tethering is asymmetric with PML predominance in patients with surgical annuloplasty and the asymmetry was progressive only in those with late recurrent/persistent MR. Posterior displacement of the coaptation after annuloplasty in patients with late MR can be explained as a result of restricted PML. This augmented PML tethering contributed to recurrent/persistent ischemic MR late after ring annuloplasty.
Relation to Previous Studies
Recurrent ischemic MR despite surgical annuloplasty is related to leaflet tethering by progressive LV remodeling.6 Green et al has observed restricted PML after surgical annuloplasty,15 which was related to early postoperative persistent ischemic MR.16 Results of this study are consistent with these and further revealed importance of augmented PML tethering for the recurrent/persistent ischemic MR in the chronic phase after surgical ring annuloplasty.
Clinical Implications
Although mitral annuloplasty may not directly relieve ventricular tethering, it is effective to repair ischemic/functional MR by reducing antero-posterior annular dimension to restore reduced coaptation by tethering.5 However, PML tethering was significantly increased afterward even in patients without postoperative MR. Therefore, mitral annuloplasty reduces antero-posterior annular diameter at the expense of augmented PML tethering. When the former effect is predominant, MR can be eliminated by ring annuloplasty. However, when the former is not predominant, recurrent MR may develop. Results of this study suggest need for aggressive undersized annuloplasty, because longer AML than antero-posterior annular diameter is required in the presence of restricted PML. At the same time, more posterior location of the coaptation than posterior annulus and significant bending of AML by tethering from basal chordae in patients with late MR suggest that considerably longer AML than annular diameter is required to prevent leakage. In addition, reduction in LVESV after the surgery was associated with less tethering. These also encourage interventions addressing ventricular tethering, such as LV plasty, chordal elongation or cutting, PM alignment, leaflet elongation, and others.20–25 Further, interventions addressing PML tethering are also encouraged.24
Limitations
Multiple patients were excluded because of the lack of serial echocardiography; therefore, the incidence of recurrent/persistent MR may not be accurate. Blinded measure to surgical outcome was not performed because of black and white echo images and color images are on the same set of postoperative images. All patients with serial echocardiography after surgical annuloplasty for ischemic/functional MR were investigated to address characteristics of recurrent/persistent MR with heterogeneous etiology and procedure. However, the small number of studied patients requires further investigations to address specific issues such as recurrent/persistent MR after isolated annuloplasty, effects of rigid and flexible ring annuloplasty with or without aggressive undersizing, and effects of different types of LV plasty in patients with specific etiologies such as different location of myocardial infarction or nonischemic LV dysfunction. Nevertheless, the purpose of this study was achieved by demonstrating significant contribution of augmented and progressive PML tethering for the recurrent/persistent ischemic MR in the chronic phase after surgical ring annuloplasty.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
Y. Otsuji was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research 17500334 from Japan Society for the Promoting of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Disclosures
This paper has no relation to any clinical trial registration.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Presented at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, Dallas, Tex, November 13–16, 2005.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Bolling SF, Pagani FD, Deeb GM, Bach DS. Intermediate-term outcome of mitral reconstruction in cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 115: 381–386;discussion 387–388.
2. Bax JJ, Braun J, Somer ST, Klautz R, Holman ER, Versteegh MI, Boersma E, Schalij MJ, van der Wall EE, Dion RA. Restrictive annuloplasty and coronary revascularization in ischemic mitral regurgitation results in reverse left ventricular remodeling. Circulation. 2004; 110 (Suppl II): II103–II108.
3. Calafiore AM, Gallina S, Di Mauro M, Gaeta F, Iaco AL, D’Alessandro S, Mazzei V, Di Giammarco G. Mitral valve procedure in dilated cardiomyopathy: repair or replacement? Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 71: 1146–1152.
4. Tahta SA, Oury JH, Maxwell JM, Hiro SP, Duran CM. Outcome after mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002; 11: 11–18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. McGee Jr EC, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, Rajeswaran J, Cohen G, Najam F, Shiota T, Sabik JF, Lytle BW, McCarthy PM, Cosgrove DM. Recurrent mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 128: 916–924.
6. Hung J, Papakostas L, Tahta SA, Hardy BG, Bollen BA, Duran CM, Levine RA. Mechanism of recurrent ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty: continued LV remodeling as a moving target. Circulation. 2004; 110 (Suppl II): II85–II90.
7. Dahlberg PS, Orszulak TA, Mullany CJ, Daly RC, Enriquez-Sarano M, Schaff HV. Late outcome of mitral valve surgery for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 76: 1539–1548.
8. Godley RW, Wann LS, Rogers EW, Feigenbaum H, Weyman AE. Incomplete mitral leaflet closure in patients with papillary muscle dysfunction. Circulation. 1981; 63: 565–571.
9. Otsuji Y, Handschumacher MD, Schwammenthal E, Jiang L, Song JK, Guerrero JL, Vlahakes GJ, Levine RA. Insights from three-dimensional echocardiography into the mechanism of functional mitral regurgitation: direct in vivo demonstration of altered leaflet tethering geometry. Circulation. 1997; 96: 1999–2008.
10. Yiu SF, Enriquez-Sarano M, Tribouilloy C, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Determinants of the degree of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction: a quantitative clinical study. Circulation. 2000; 102: 1400–1406.
11. Gorman RC, McCaughan JS, Ratcliffe MB, Gupta KB, Streicher JT, Ferrari VA, St John-Sutton MG, Bogen DK, Edmunds LH Jr. Pathogenesis of acute ischemic mitral regurgitation in three dimensions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995; 109: 684–693.
12. Komeda M, Glasson JR, Bolger AF, Daughters GT 2nd, MacIsaac A, Oesterle SN, Ingels NB Jr., Miller DC. Geometric determinants of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1997; 96 (Suppl II): II128–II133.
13. Agricola E, Oppizzi M, Maisano F, De Bonis M, Schinkel AFL, Torracca L, Margonato A, Melisurgo G, Alfieri O. Echocardiographic classification of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation caused by restricted motion according to tethering pattern. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2004; 5: 326–334.
14. Watanabe N, Ogasawara Y, Yamaura Y, Kawamoto T, Toyota E, Akasaka T, Yoshida K. Quantitation of mitral valve tenting in ischemic mitral regurgitation by transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 763–769.
15. Green GR, Dagum P, Glasson JR, Nistal JF, Daughters GT 2nd, Ingels NB Jr., Miller DC. Restricted posterior leaflet motion after mitral ring annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 68: 2100–2106.
16. Zhu F, Otsuji Y, Yotsumoto G, Yuasa T, Ueno T, Yu B, Koriyama C, Hamasaki S, Biro S, Kisanuki A, Minagoe S, Levine RA, Sakata R, Tei C. Mechanism of persistent ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty: importance of augmented posterior mitral leaflet tethering. Circulation. 2005; 112 (Suppl I): I396–I401.
17. Saga T, Miyamoto T. An alternative technique for the repair of left ventricular aneurysm. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 1999; 7: 74–75.
18. Ormiston JA, Shah PM, Tei C, Wong M. Size and motion of the mitral valve annulus in man. I. A two-dimensional echocardiographic method and findings in normal subjects. Circulation. 1981; 64: 113–120.
19. Nesta F, Otsuji Y, Handschumacher MD, Messas E, Leavitt M, Carpentier A, Levine RA, Hung J. Leaflet concavity: a rapid visual clue to the presence and mechanism of functional mitral regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003; 16: 1301–1308.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Liel-Cohen N, Guerrero JL, Otsuji Y, Handschumacher MD, Rudski LG, Hunziker PR, Tanabe H, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Sullivan S, Levine RA. Design of a new surgical approach for ventricular remodeling to relieve ischemic mitral regurgitation: insights from 3-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2756–2763.
21. Messas E, Guerrero JL, Handschumacher MD, Conrad C, Chow CM, Sullivan S, Yoganathan AP, Levine RA. Chordal cutting: a new therapeutic approach for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2001; 104: 1958–1963.
22. Kron IL, Green GR, Cope JT. Surgical relocation of the posterior papillary muscle in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 74: 600–601.
23. Hvass U, Tapia M, Baron F, Pouzet B, Shafy A. Papillary muscle sling: a new functional approach to mitral repair in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and functional mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 75: 809–811.
24. Dobre M, Koul B, Rojer A. Anatomic and physiologic correction of the restricted posterior mitral leaflet motion in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 120: 409–411.
25. De Bonis M, Lapenna E, La Canna G, Ficarra E, Pagliaro M, Torracca L, Maisano F, Alfieri O. Mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation in end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy: role of the "edge-to-edge" technique. Circulation. 2005; 112 (Suppl I): I402–I408.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. Penicka, H. Linkova, O. Lang, R. Fojt, V. Kocka, M. Vanderheyden, and J. Bartunek Predictors of Improvement of Unrepaired Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Elective Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Circulation, October 13, 2009; 120(15): 1474 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. de Varennes, R. Chaturvedi, S. Sidhu, A. V. Cote, W. L. P. Shan, C. Goyer, R. Hatzakorzian, J. Buithieu, and A. Sniderman Initial Results of Posterior Leaflet Extension for Severe Type IIIb Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Circulation, June 2, 2009; 119(21): 2837 - 2843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||