Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;114:e574
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.650804
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pocar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Donatelli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pocar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Donatelli, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease

(Circulation. 2006;114:e574.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Correspondence

Letter by Pocar et al Regarding Article, "Percutaneous Treatment With Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Versus Bypass Surgery for Unprotected Left Main Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience"

Marco Pocar, MD, PhD; Eugenio Quaini, MD; Francesco Donatelli, MD

Cattedra di Cardiochirurgia, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy

To the Editor:

We commend Chieffo et al1 for the very interesting results obtained with implantation of drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main stenosis. However, statistical significance was reached only for composite end points despite a different antiplatelet regimen, and the somewhat optimistic conclusions sound unconvincing to a surgical audience.2

Only 42 of 107 patients (39%) undergoing stenting had 3-vessel disease, which describes a selected population when compared with surgical series with left main disease. Conversely, the authors state that the "approach selected appeared suitable to guarantee complete revascularization," (p 2542) but only 18 of 42 patients (43%) and 68 of 98 patients (69%) in the interventional and surgical cohorts, respectively, had additional right coronary stenoses treated during the index procedure. This seems logical (although unspecified) for staged percutaneous approaches but is surprising from a surgical standpoint, given that it demonstrates incomplete revascularization in nearly one-third of the cases of 3-vessel disease. Furthermore, the number of bypass grafts per patient is not specified. Incomplete revascularization is a well-known risk factor for suboptimal results, possibly including occluded right coronary arteries with prior inferior wall infarction.3

The observations above might correlate with the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme ≥40 ng/mL) in surgically treated patients, which appears exceedingly high (overall, 26%; on-pump operations, 34%), especially in view of the relatively low prevalence of unstable angina (22%). Myocardial protective techniques are not described and may imply important variables, including specific protocols for energy-depleted hearts and retrograde cardioplegia. In this respect, creatine kinase-MB levels ≥25 ng/mL correlate with 30-day mortality rates and postoperative left ventricular dysfunction.4 Similarly, perioperative myocardial injury during off-pump revascularization often relates to early graft dysfunction and predicts 1-year adverse cardiac outcome.5

Although end points include stroke or major cerebrovascular events, no data are shown regarding prior events, screening for carotid disease, or carotid revascularization during the follow-up period. This further reduces the strength of composite end points comprising cerebrovascular complications. Furthermore, patients with left main disease show a higher prevalence of critical carotid stenosis and should thus be more aggressively investigated, especially those who are older or who have multiple higher-risk factors.

Finally, stating that "[I]t might, however, be fair to point out that routine angiographic follow-up was part of this initial protocol to detect early left main stent restenosis" (p 2545) in patients treated with stenting, the authors1 implicitly exclude the occurrence of angiographically driven repeat revascularization in surgically treated patients, pointing out another limitation inherent to the retrospective nature of their study.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 

  1. Chieffo A, Morici N, Maisano F, Cosgrave J, Montorfano M, Airoldi F, Carlino M, Michev I, Melzi G, Sangiorgi G, Alfieri O, Colombo A. Percutaneous treatment with drug-eluting stent implantation versus bypass surgery for unprotected left main stenosis: a single-center experience. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2542–2547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Guyton RA. Coronary artery bypass is superior to drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 81: 1949–1957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Gaudino M, Alessandrini F, Glieca F, Luciani N, Cellini C, Pragliola C, Morelli M, Girola F, Possati G. Effect of surgical revascularization of a right coronary artery tributary of an infarcted nonischemic territory on the outcome of patients with three-vessel disease: a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 127: 435–439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ramsay J, Shernan S, Fitch J, Finnegan P, Todaro T, Filloon T, Nussmeier NA. Increased creatine kinase MB level predicts postoperative mortality after cardiac surgery independent of new Q waves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005; 129: 300–306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Nathoe HM, Moons KG, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, Borst C, de Jaegere PP, Grobbee DE, Octopus Study Group. Risk and determinants of myocardial injury during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97: 1482–1486.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pocar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Donatelli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pocar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Donatelli, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease