| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2006;113:e393.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Correspondence |
Wilmington, DE
Weitzman et al1 found a relationship between exposure to tobacco smoke and risk of developing metabolic syndrome among adolescents. They speculate that tobacco smoke exposure may increase the risk of insulin resistance, which in turn may contribute to an increased risk of developing metabolic syndrome. Other studies may lend some insights into this process.
Recent studies indicate that epigenetic mechanisms may be involved in metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.24 There is growing evidence that variations in DNA methylation patterns may play a role in insulin resistance.3 The promoters of key genes involved in glucose metabolism display differential DNA methylation. It has been suggested that alterations in DNA methylation patterns might explain how developmental programming during the prenatal period influences the risk of developing metabolic syndrome later in life.2 Diabetes is often a part of syndromes involving aberrant imprinting. Age-associated epigenetic drift of methylation patterns parallels an increased risk of various pathological conditions, including insulin resistance.2,3
Smoking has been associated with aberrant DNA methylation patterns.5 The inactivation of key genes through promoter hypermethylation is believed to be one of the mechanisms by which tobacco smoke promotes the development of lung cancer.
As more is learned about the epigenetics of metabolic syndrome, it might be worth looking at the impact of tobacco smoke on the methylation of genes related to that condition.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Gallou-Kabani C, Junien C. Nutritional epigenomics of metabolic syndrome: new perspective against the epidemic. Diabetes. 2005; 54: 18991906.
3. Maier S, Olek A. Diabetes: a candidate disease for efficient DNA methylation profiling. J Nutr. 2002; 132 (suppl 8): 2440S2443S.
4. Wren JD, Garner HR. Data-mining analysis suggests an epigenetic pathogenesis for type 2 diabetes. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2005; 2005: 104112.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Belinsky SA, Palmisano WA, Gilliland FD, Crooks LA, Divine KK, Winters SA, Grimes MJ, Harms HJ, Tellez CS, Smith TM, Moots PP, Lechner JF, Stidley CA, Crowell RE. Aberrant promoter methylation in bronchial epithelium and sputum from current and former smokers. Cancer Res. 2002; 62: 23702377.
New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
American Academy of Pediatrics, Center for Child Health Research, Rochester, NY
Pediatric Cardiology, Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
St Louis Childrens Hospital, Washington University, St Louis, Mo
MGH Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy, General Pediatrics Division, Mass General Hospital for Children, Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Boston, Mass
Response
We thank Celia Ross for her very interesting letter. She proposes that our findings reported earlier in this journal1 of a strong, dose-response association between second-hand smoke exposure, as assessed by cotinine levels, and the metabolic syndrome among adolescents may be explained by findings from a related literature. That literature, she points out, suggests that DNA methylation patterns may play a causative role in the development of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome.
Although we recognize the need for additional epidemiologic studies that confirm (or do not confirm) our findings, we believe that her suggestion is potentially important for 2 distinct reasons. First, the identification of a plausible underlying biological mechanism to explain these epidemiologically observed phenomena creates opportunities for assigning causality with the subsequent possibility of more effective disease prevention and treatment strategies.2 Second, she also raises the possibility that the association we reported, to a degree that is currently entirely unclear, may reflect not so much concurrent or earlier childhood exposure to secondhand smoke but rather prenatal exposure. Difficulties inherent in distinguishing the effects of prenatal from postnatal tobacco smoke exposure have arisen not only in this area of study but also in terms of parental smoking and childrens risks of asthma, ear infections, sudden infant death syndrome, and neurobehavioral development,3,4 and her suggestion may aid work in these related areas as well.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr Daniels is a consultant/advisory board member of Abbott Laboratories. The other authors report no conflicts.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Last JM. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001.
3. DiFranza JR, Aligne A, Weitzman M. Prenatal and postnatal environmental tobacco smoke exposure and childrens health. Pediatrics. 2004; 113: 10071015.
4. Weitzman M, Byrd RS, Aligne A, Moss M. The effects of tobacco exposure on childrens behavioral and cognitive functioning: implications for clinical and public health policy and future research. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2002; 24: 397406.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Related Article:
Circulation 2006 113: 1155.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |