Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;113:e936
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.621094
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saul, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Haemmerich, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saul, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Haemmerich, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery

(Circulation. 2006;113:e936.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Correspondence

Letter by Saul and Haemmerich Regarding Article "Comparison of Electrode Cooling Between Internal and Open Irrigation in Radiofrequency Ablation Lesion Depth and Incidence of Thrombus and Steam Pop"

J. Philip Saul, MD; Dieter Haemmerich, PhD

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

To the Editor:

The article by Yokoyama et al1 comparing the effects of cooled-tip ablation catheters using either the internal or open irrigation method makes a number of important observations regarding the potential for thrombus and steam pop formation with cooled-tip techniques. However, the study design does not accurately mimic the methodology used in clinical practice. In clinical application of the open irrigation catheter, temperature control is typically used, with a target temperature of 40° to 45°C.2 Similarly, when using the internally cooled catheter in a clinical setting, power is adjusted to always keep the electrode tip temperature below 40°C.3,4 It is both recommended by the manufacturer and well known to those who use the system that an electrode temperature above 40°C frequently leads to a pop and/or impedance rise. This observation is nearly identical to the data presented by the authors (their Figure 6b).1 The constant power methodology used in their study resulted in tip temperatures as high as 60°C for the internally cooled catheter. Only 5 of 63 applications had a tip temperature of less than 40°C, and only 1 of these applications caused thrombus and steam pop. Alternatively, the open irrigation catheter tip temperatures were all below 45°C.

The authors hypothesized in the introduction that "lesion depth would be similar between closed loop and open irrigation electrodes, but the effect of flushing around the electrode...would decrease the formation of thrombus during ablation" (p 12). What the authors have demonstrated is that the open irrigation system is a more powerful cooling technique than the closed-loop cooling catheter. Tip electrode and tissue temperatures were lower with the open system than with the closed system (their Figure 6). The increased cooling capacity of open irrigation allows for the safe application of more power. Had the authors followed the clinical guidelines for the 2 systems, they would have likely found similar rates of thrombus and steam pop, but might have found a larger lesion size with the internally cooled catheter, as more power could be applied. However, the increased cooling would also have carried away more power so that less power would have been delivered to the tissues. Such speculation about lesion size remains speculation in the absence of experiments that more accurately mimic the application methods used clinically.

Yokoyama et al1 identify important safety issues using cooled-tip ablation technologies, but do not speak directly to the concerns when using these catheters in clinical practice.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Disclosures

None.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 

  1. Yokoyama K, Nakagawa H, Wittkampf FH, Pitha JV, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Comparison of electrode cooling between internal and open irrigation in radiofrequency ablation lesion depth and incidence of thrombus and steam pop. Circulation. 2006; 113: 11–19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Tanner H, Lukac P, Schwick N, Fuhrer J, Pedersen AK, Hansen PS, Delacretaz E. Irrigated-tip catheter ablation of intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in patients late after surgery of congenital heart disease. Heart Rhythm. 2004; 1: 268–275.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Stevenson WG, Cooper J, Sapp J. Optimizing RF output for cooled RF ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15 (10 suppl): S24–S27.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Cooper JM, Sapp JL, Tedrow U, Pellegrini CP, Robinson D, Epstein LM, Stevenson WG. Ablation with an internally irrigated radiofrequency catheter: learning how to avoid steam pops. Heart Rhythm. 2004; 1: 329–333.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saul, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Haemmerich, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saul, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Haemmerich, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery